WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO Bishop Athanasius Schneider? HE SEEMS TO HAVE DIVED INTO THE DEEP END OF THE POOL WITHOUT HIS LIFE PRESERVER, THE FAITH!!!!!!

CANON LAWDEBATESFAITH

A REFUTATION OF BISHOP SCHNEIDER’S DEMAGOGUERY

VIDEOFROM ROME EDITOR1 COMMENT

By Alexis Bugnolo

A lot of Catholics have asked me to refute Bishop Athanasius’ Schneider in detail. I have written a partial refutation, but his position is so absurd I have refrained, but here is a sound refutation on the more principal points:

However, I will point out that there is in the Church no such thing as the Byzantine Catholic Patriarch. The group which produced this has a checkered history, canonically, but at least doctrinally, in this refutation of Mons. Schneider, they take a Catholic position. Synods must be called in every nation to condemn Bergoglio.

The only errors I see in this video are:

First, that the authors of this video hold that if canon law is used to support heresy and apostasy, canon law is invalid. The correct Catholic position is, rather, that when canon law is used to support heresy and apostasy, it is the use which is to be condemned and the interpretation which is to be corrected by canon 17.

Second that they assert that the worship of an idol is a heresy or manifestation of heresy. But it is rather a sin of apostasy, is not directly a sin of heresy, because heresy is the denial of a truth which is revealed by God, but the adoration of an idol is the denial of the entire Deposit of the Faith. Adoration of an idol might include heresy, but it is much more than heresy.

Third, they avoid entirely that Pope Benedict XVI is the true pope. They do this because in certain matters they themselves have usurped ecclesiastical offices and powers, such as, for example, establishing a Byzantine Patriarchate, without any authority from God or Pope Benedict XVI.

Finally,  I would like to point out, for the sake of public record, that back in 2015 I was greatly inspired by the sound and heroic statements of Bishop Schneider against the errors being promoted by Bergoglio. It truly saddens me that he has abandoned the Catholic Faith and Canon Law to insist that Bergoglio is still the pope, despite all his public sins, his pertinacious heresy, his apostasy and his schism mongering. In this he has done a very wicked thing, and I think if he persists in his false position, that he must be reckoned by all Catholics a heretic himself, for denying the constant teaching of the Church that heretics and apostates and schismatics lose office immediately, as canon 1364 states.

SHARE THIS:

RELATED

Bishop Schneider, your Essay is a porridge of falsehood and presumption!

Bishop Schneider, your Essay is a porridge of falsehood and presumption!

In “Editorials”The wicked impiety of liars

The wicked impiety of liars

In “Editorials”5  Questions for Bishop Schneider & Dr. Taylor Marshall

5 Questions for Bishop Schneider & Dr. Taylor Marshall

In “Faith”BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER

Post navigation

PREVIOUS POSTResponding to public calumnyNEXT POSTBolsonaro says the “Pandemic” is Media Hype and must be rejected by all nations

ONE THOUGHT ON “A REFUTATION OF BISHOP SCHNEIDER’S DEMAGOGUERY”

  1. Em SSo absurd that a quasi-schismatic group would point out the mote in Schneider’s eye when the beam in their eye seems quite the beam! (Lord knows). There’s always hope for both, but especially Schneider if he repents and regains the Apostolic Spirit of Saint Athanasius of Alexandria. Man… that would be the day…Liked by 1 person

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO Bishop Athanasius Schneider? HE SEEMS TO HAVE DIVED INTO THE DEEP END OF THE POOL WITHOUT HIS LIFE PRESERVER, THE FAITH!!!!!!

  1. mortimerzilch says:

    Since Pope Benedict XVI did not it seems abdicate the papacy (but only its ministry) – it is not surprising that a valid election of another pope could proceed afterward – for almost certainly Francis was invalidly elected.

Comments are closed.