IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT THE CATHOLIC HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION AND CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES HAVE EMBRACED OBAMACARE
The sad truth is that those two organizations cn always be counted on to embrace programs proposed by the Democrat Party and to oppose programs proposed by the Republican Party. It is no so much partisan politics as it is that our Catholic people who work in the health and social service fields always instinctively support proposals which they can identify as an exercise of the fundamental option for the poor. What they fail to take into account all too frequently is that there are unintended consequences resulting from some of those proposed programs. Consequences such as making abortion and sterilization more available, economic consequences that work hardships on the sectors of our population that provide the financial basis for the very existence of those programs. This is not to say that Republican proposals are always good. On the contrary, they can be as harmful as those proposed by the social engineers of the other party.
It seems certain that the Nation will have some sort of healthcare reform by the end of the year. What is to be hoped is that the reform will do more good than harm, but harm it is almost certain to do.
Tactical Retreat, Not Waterloo, On ObamaCare
By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER | Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:20 PM PT
Yesterday, Barack Obama was God. Today, he’s fallen from grace, the magic gone, his health care reform dead.
If you believed the first idiocy — and half the mainstream media did — you’ll believe the second. Don’t believe either.
Conventional wisdom always makes straight-line projections. They are always wrong.
Yes, Obama’s aura has diminished, in part because of overweening overexposure. But by year’s end he will emerge with something he can call health care reform.
The Democrats in Congress will pass it because they must. Otherwise, they’ll have slain their own savior in his first year in office.
But that bill will look nothing like the massive reform Obama originally intended. The beginning of the retreat was signaled by Obama’s curious reference — made five times — to “health-insurance reform” in his July 22 news conference.
Reforming the health care system is dead. Cause of death? Blunt trauma administered not by Republicans, not even by Blue Dog Democrats, but by the green eyeshades at the Congressional Budget Office.
(1) On June 16, the CBO determined that the Senate Finance Committee bill would cost $1.6 trillion over 10 years, delivering a sticker shock that was near fatal.
(2) Five weeks later, the CBO gave its verdict on the Independent Medicare Advisory Council, Dr. Obama’s latest miracle cure, conjured up at the last minute to save ObamaCare from fiscal ruin, and consisting of a committee of medical experts highly empowered to make Medicare cuts. The CBO said that IMAC would do nothing, trimming costs by perhaps 0.2%. A 0.2% cut is not a solution; it’s a punch line.
(3) The final blow came last Sunday when the CBO euthanized the Obama “out years” myth. The administration’s argument had been: Sure, ObamaCare will initially increase costs and deficits. But it pays for itself in the long run because it bends the curve downward in coming decades.
The CBO put in writing the obvious: In its second decade, Obama-Care significantly bends the curve upward — increasing deficits even more than in the first decade.
This is obvious because Obama’s own first-decade numbers were built on arithmetic trickery. New taxes to support the health care plan begin in 2011, but the benefits part of the program doesn’t fully kick in until 2015.
That excess revenue is, of course, one time only. It makes the first decade numbers look artificially low, but once you pass 2015, the yearly deficits become larger and eternal.
Three CBO strikes and you’re out cold.
Though it must be admitted that the White House itself added to the farcical nature of its frantic and futile cost-cutting when budget director Peter Orszag held a three-hour brainstorming session with Senate Finance Committee aides trying to find ways to save.
“At one point,” reports the Wall Street Journal, “they flipped through the tax code, looking for ideas.” Looking for ideas? Months into the president’s health care drive and just days before his deadline for Congress to pass real legislation? You gonna give this gang the power to remake one-sixth of the U.S. economy?
Not likely. Whatever structural reforms dribble out of Congress before the August recess will likely not survive the year. In the end, Obama will have to settle for something very modest. And indeed it will be health insurance reform.
To win back the vast constituency that has insurance, is happy with it and is mightily resisting the fatal lures of ObamaCare, the president will in the end simply impose heavy regulations on the insurance companies that will make what you already have secure, portable and imperishable: no policy cancellations, no pre-existing condition requirements, perhaps even a cap on out-of-pocket expenses.
Nirvana. But wouldn’t this bankrupt the insurance companies? Of course it would. There will be only one way to make this work: Impose an individual mandate. Force the 18 million Americans between 18 and 34 who (often quite rationally) forgo health insurance to buy it.
This will create a huge new pool of customers who rarely get sick but will be paying premiums every month. And those premiums will subsidize nirvana health insurance for older folks.
Net result? Another huge transfer of wealth from the young to the old, the now-routine specialty of the baby boomers; an end to the dream of imposing European-style health care on the U.S.; and a president who before Christmas will wave his pen, proclaim victory and watch as the newest conventional wisdom reaffirms his divinity.
Charles Krauthammer is a syndicated columnist whose columns appear regularly in THE WASHINGTON POST.