It may seem like a small thing, skipping weekday Mass.  But those little turnings add up to one big Non serviam.  At this very moment, I’m passing up a chance to dispose myself towards the good. I’m choosing not-God. As Jesus says, “He that is not with me is against me” (Matt 12:30). 

Choose Your Own Hell

Barron and Hart vs. Twitter

MICHAEL WARREN DAVIS

DEC 9
 
SAVE▷  LISTEN
 
The Harrowing of Hell by the Master of the Osservanza

A specter is haunting the United States—the specter of universalism!  At least, according to Fox News.

In a surprising op-ed for their website, the Rev. Max Lucado warns:

A shadow has set upon American society.  The Christian faith is in decline. Spiritual indifference is everywhere.  Addiction is up.  Church attendance is down. . . .  On the rare occasion that spirituality is discussed, the Gospel is often under attack.  The authority of the Bible is questioned.  Universalism is suddenly in vogue.  No one is a sinner.  No one will be lost.  Everyone will somehow be saved.  There is no eternal punishment.  The idea of judgment is archaic and barbaric. 

“This,” Lucado tells us, “is not good news.”

He’s right, of course.  We all have anecdotal evidence:  relatives at funerals who are sure Uncle Nicky’s in Heaven, even though he fixed horse races for a living…  and hit his wife…  and his goomah…  and his kids…  and died coked up to the eyeballs in a Tijuana brothel. 

What are they thinking? 

It’s pretty straightforward: if God loves us, He couldn’t damn damn a single one of us. And we might sneer at that kind of talk.  Yet many brilliant, faithful Christians have been universalists of one sort or another.  

In the Early Church there was Clement of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, Didymus the Blind, Gregory Nazianzen, Maximus the Confessor, and of course Origen of Alexandria. 

William Law, Soren Kierkegaard, and George MacDonald were universalists. So was G. K. Chesterton—at least for a while.  In Orthodoxy, the masterpiece of his early life, he wrote:  “To hope for all souls is imperative, and it is quite tenable that their salvation is inevitable.”

In our own day, two of the most prominent Christian thinkers in America are avowed universalists:  Bishop Robert Barron and David Bentley Hart.

Bishop Barron is what’s known as a hopeful universalist.  He follows Hans Urs von Balthasar in saying that we may at least hope that all men will be saved, though we can’t say for sure.  According to His Excellency,

Because of God’s acrobatic displays of love—the Son going all the way down to the very bottom of sin and death and then being drawn back to the Father in the power of the Holy Spirit—we may reasonably hope that even those who have wandered farthest away from God will be drawn into the dynamics of the divine love.

Bishop Barron claims that Catherine of Siena, Therese of Lisieux, and Edith Stein were also “hopeful universalists.”

Professor Hart’s universalism is far more dogmatic. As he writes in his (in)famous book That All Shall Be Saved,

If Christianity taken as a whole is indeed an entirely coherent and credible system of belief, then the universalist understanding of its message is the only one possible. And, quite imprudently, I say that without the least hesitation or qualification.

Hart’s brand of universalism is known as as a restorationist. Like Origen and MacDonald, he believes that all souls will be reconciled to God after a period of purgation known as “apocatastasis,” or restoration. It’s an extremely sophisticated version of the argument you get at Uncle Nicky’s funeral. 


At the very least, I think we can say this: universalism is the one heresy you might come by honestly.  After all, universalists only want what God wants:  the salvation of all mankind.  

Unless you’re an especially staunch Calvinist, you don’t believe that God wants anyone to go to Hell. On the contrary, He does everything in His power to save us.  But you also believe that God gives us free will.  He wants us to love Him, and love must be freely given.  In order for us to love God, then, we must have the option of hating Him. 

Whoever is damned, then, must choose damnation. As C. S. Lewis said, the doors of Hell are locked from the inside.

Of course, universalists deny that they’re locked at all. So, this whole debate really centers around one question:  could anyone hate God so much that he opts to spend eternity in the outer darkness?  Could anyone really choose damnation? Could anyone side against himself so decisively?

These questions might be too wonderful for me. I’m certainly not a theologian. I’m something far worse: a journalist. But that means I do know journals. And I was mulling all these questions over the other day when I started flipping through the latest Spectator, where found this (strangely pertinent) article in the latest Spectator

It’s about Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter. Here’s how it begins:

A philosopher once famously said that Hell is other people.  What the world has learned from Twitter is that Hell is other people’s opinions.  It’s no wonder, then, that when Elon Musk came bounding into Twitter headquarters in late October—after changing his Twitter bio to “Chief Twit”—a popular response, on Twitter and off, was, “welcome to Hell.”

Apparently, Mr. Musk himself described Twitter as a a “free-for-all hellscape” in an open letter to Twitter advertisers.

It probably wouldn’t cut the mustard for Professor Hart or Bishop Barron, but I’m tempted to say that the fact that anyone chooses to spend any amount of time on Twitter is proof that someone might choose to spend an eternity in Hell.

Look: there can be no illusions anymore. We all know that Twitter is evil. Users now spend at least half their time on the site tweeting about how much they hate Twitter. We know it’s a huge waste of time.  We know that the hours they spend online would be better used taking walks with our wives, or playing with our kids, or listening to music, or reading, or praying.

More than that, we know that Twitter actually making you a worse person.  It teaches us to hate our enemies and to fret constantly about the state of the world. It exposes us to the very worst of mankind, filling our hearts with anger and fear and doubt.

We also know it’s having the exact same effect on millions of your neighbors.  We know that, by remaining on Twitter, we’re helping to keep the whole rotten system afloat.  We’re doing measurable harm to ourselves—and the world—by remaining on the site

None of this is news to us.  We know that our lives were better before we got a Twitter account. We know that our lives would be better if we deleted those accounts.  And we know that all of our excuses for staying on the site (it helps us to “stay informed” or “keep in touch with friends” or whatever) are rubbish.   

But here’s the thing: Twitter, like all evil, is a habit-forming substance. And the longer you indulge an addiction, the harder it is to break. The longer we’re on Twitter, the less likely it becomes that we’ll ever delete our accounts. 


As it happens, this dovetails nicely with a book I’m reading for Advent. It’s called Come, Lord Jesus by Mother Mary Francis.  If you don’t know her work, you should.  She’s like a combination of St. Francis of Assisi and Ronald Knox, which is about the highest compliment I could pay someone.

Anyway, for Friday of the first week, her meditation is on that passage from Isaiah about those who are “disposed to evil.”  Mother writes,

When the Scriptures speak of people disposed to do evil, it means that they were doing it again and again, so that every time a new choice came, their pattern of evil disposed them even less and less toward making a good choice. . . .  

Every time we choose how to deal with our impatience, we are more disposed to be patient the next time our patience is tried.  Every time we step forward in the service we were not expecting to be asked for, that we do not feel like doing, we are more disposed to be generous, to be given, to be self-forgetful.  On the contrary, every time we say a sharp word, an angry word, we are more disposed to say it a little louder and a little faster in the next situation like that.  

But each time that we put down that inner turbulence and respond in a loving, sweet, soothing, and smoothing way, we are more disposed toward good the next time, and it becomes less and less difficult.  This is wonderful.

It is wonderful—and the opposite is terrible. 

Again, sin is addictive.  The more we indulge in it, the more we crave it.  The more power we give Satan over our souls, the more he takes for himself.  

God will chase us to the gates of Hell and beyond.  I know that for sure, because I’ve seen Him do it.  But He’s our Father, and a good father never forces His love on His children.  So, if we don’t choose to turn back, He won’t make us turn back. If we keep running, we’ll keep running. 

As I type, I hear the bells chiming at the church down the street.  It’s the feast of St. Ambrose, and I’m supposed to be at Mass.  But I was so absorbed in writing this blog post that I forgot.  I’m choosing against God, against the good, against myself.

It may seem like a small thing, skipping weekday Mass.  But those little turnings add up to one big Non serviam.  At this very moment, I’m passing up a chance to dispose myself towards the good. I’m choosing not-God. As Jesus says, “He that is not with me is against me” (Matt 12:30). 

That’s the bad news. The good news is that Christ also says, “He that is not against us is for us” (Luke 9:50). We don’t have to be perfect. In fact, we can’t be perfect—not in this life, anyway. But we can make a habit of choosing the good 

A million of those little turnings add up to one great Fiat. And that’s the reason for the season, isn’t it?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Left failed America. It destroyed the formative years of millions of school-age children while upping the cancer rate through neglected screenings, spiking spousal and family abuse, prompting more suicides and drug abuse, wrecking the supply-chain system, stoking ruinous inflation, and all without any data that such lockdowns had ever significantly reduced the death rate, much less so in a cost-to-benefit analysis.

UltraLeftwing Hysteria 

and the 

Art of the Psychodrama.

Parts 4 & 5

By: Victor Davis Hanson

December 6 & 7, 2022

For every pre-election October surprise, there is always a post-election November psychodramatic “bombshell.”

This year, right after the vote, there was the sudden announcement that a special prosecutor was appointed to investigate Donald Trump—on grounds of purported complicity in the January 6 riot and the hysterias arising over his presidential papers.

But that was not all. Also, strangely after the election, we learned from government leaks that those “nuclear secrets”that Trump supposedly stole from the White House and which in his Mar-a-Lago hands endangered the very lives of 330 million Americans were, well, also a lie. The “secrets,” or so we were leaked to, were all along mostly mementos and correspondence that Trump, in the fashion of many ex-presidents, rightly or wrongly claimed were his personal rather than government property.

Assume that had Merrick Garland announced on the eve of the election that he was going after Roadrunner Trump for a fourth time—after two failed impeachment trials, and a failed special counsel’s 22-month investigation—some swing voters might have decided that the Left was now simply going full Stasi.

But that was not all. Mysteriously, no sooner had the ballot counting nearly finished than we learned that the $30-40 billion “empire” of one of the largest Democrat leftwing funders, the slovenly 30-year Sam Bankman-Fried, had exploded.

His “riches” abruptly vanished, also strangely, right under the noses of clueless federal regulators. The progressive saint robbed perhaps a million people of their investments, as Bankman siphoned off billions from his investors’ accounts, in one of the sloppiest but most effective Ponzi schemes in memory. (We enjoyed the various Democratic recipients’ forced promises of repayment—but to charities rather than to the investors whose money they had illegally received. How is passing along other people’s money to tax-exempt charities rather than back to the owners a sign of morality?)

Before November 7th, Bankman-Fried and his Stanford Law School professor parents (his mother ran a PAC funneling rather dark Silicon Valley money into 2022 leftwing candidates) were beatified by the media as putting dirty capitalist dollars to work for their own comfort and progressive causes—and all from luxury, tax-free Bahamas digs.

The locus classicus for the psychodramatic, pre-election omission is the Hunter Biden laptop suppression farce. On the eve of the November 2020 election, Hunter’s laptop, with hard proof of his own and his family’s felonious behaviors, turned up abandoned at a computer repair store.

Within hours of the discovery, the fusion DNC/media came up with the spin that the laptop’s photos were not really of Hunter engaged in raunchy sex and drug use. But, also, we were told that Joe Biden was not really the same as Hunter’s mentioned and cited “Big Guy” or “Mr. Ten Percent” of the Biden syndicate shakedown operations. Yet who cared that those laptop references were in fact also confirmed independently by Tony Bobulinksi, a former (and cheated) partner of Hunter’s?

Instead, we were assured by fifty “experts” and former “intelligence officials” that the laptop was likely “Russian disinformation”—a last vestigial effort of Putin and the Russians to collude with Trumpian interests after the implosion of the Fusion GPS/Steele dossier/collusion hoax.

A majority of voters later polled that had they known that the incriminating Biden laptop was authentic, it might have affected their vote. Note the one-two punch of the psychodrama: not only was a lie spread that the authentic incriminating laptop was fake, given that it more or less showed that Hunter was a probable felon many times over, and an-about-to-be elected Joe Biden and members of his family were quid pro quo grifters, if not likely criminally exposed. But in addition, the defensive lie went back onto the offensive, by implying that the Russians had created the laptop. Apparently, we were to believe the experts that formerly Clinton-“reset” Russians had delivered a fake device to Hunter’s repairman after fabricating the pictures and contents—all with such accuracy that even poor hoodwinked and addled Hunter could not deny that the laptop was his.

The result was we went from proof of Biden skullduggery to once again Trump colluding with the Russians to take out Biden in the manner he and his Moscow partners had taken out poor Hillary. And both times, our FBI was involved in either spreading lies or suppressing truth or both, all to aid their progressive overlords.

Of the hundreds of psychodramas of the last decade, perhaps three have changed the course of history. All were either outright misinformation, half-truths, or remained obfuscated with the full details suppressed.

The entire COVID narrative of early 2020 ended up all but destroying the Trump administration, ruining a robust economy, and likely electing Joe Biden. Remember the ingredients of the DNC/media-led narrative. We were asked to believe by Dr. Fauci and friends that the Wuhan lab played no role in the birth of Covid. (Nor supposedly did the NIH/NIAID/CDC complex have any knowledge of, or role in, gain-of-function research in China.) Indeed, Trump’s assertions that the virus was birthed in the lab—and with some U.S. subsidies for such outlawed research in the U.S.‚ like his “racist” travel ban—was offered as proof of his anti-Chinese hatred.

Furthermore, Trump fell for the government-mandated notion that for the first time in U.S. history, the only recourse for saving America from a pandemic was to shut down the entire economy. We were to mask up the population, cancel schooling, and social distance our way to a nationwide quarantine. This unconstitutional fiat was sold on “flatten the curve” for three weeks logic, to allow the overwhelmed medical establishment to catch up with the pandemic.

In fact, the aggrandizement of power over the individual proved a strong narcotic for the Left. It got high on its newly found authority and power to pick and choose which business was to be destroyed, which to be saved, and so never let go.

The rest is history. We destroyed the formative years of millions of school-age children while upping the cancer rate through neglected screenings, spiking spousal and family abuse, prompting more suicides and drug abuse, wrecking the supply-chain system, stoking ruinous inflation, and all without any data that such lockdowns had ever significantly reduced the death rate, much less so in a cost-to-benefit analysis.

Indeed, we later had ample reason to believe that such a blanket, scatter-shot approach may have taken the focus off and resources away from properly isolating and protecting the vulnerable in long-term facilities and with comorbidities, who then died in droves. In the end, we likely also injured our collective immunity to other pathogens through two years of self-enforced sterility.

The progressive paranoia soon absorbed the entire country. Anyone not two-three-four-five times vaccinated was deemed a veritable public enemy, despite the disturbing news that by late 2022 more had died vaccinated than not vaccinated.

By 2021 any who did not wear a mask were reduced to right-wing criminal yahoos. Those who believed the vaccine might be more dangerous for teens and young men than the infections, or that the shots did not protect against infection or infectiousness, were slandered as public enemies. Thousands of “vaccine deniers” were fired from their jobs.

The Left politicized the hysteria and associated red states with murderous license. They ignored data showing less restrictive policies in, say, Texas or Florida, led to far more robust economies and less collateral damage, while incurring not much, if any, more deaths per capita than a blue state, locked-down New York, Illinois, or New Jersey.

In the end, Trump’s Operation Warp Speed vaccination program was absorbed by the Left as its own pet project, while he was blamed for both shutting down the economy and not shutting it down enough and developing vaccines that did not work as advertised while spreading anti-vax ignorance. Some narrative. But to paraphrase Harry Reid, “Trump didn’t win, did he?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools. Plato


December 8, 2022
Special Edition Leftwing Hysteria and the  Art of the Psychodrama. By: Victor Davis Hanson December 2, 2022(This is Part 3 following parts 1 & 2 published last Sunday)  The Brawley-Sharpton legacy can help to explain these latter psychodramas like the Smollett caper and the Duke Lacrosse lies. Fabricated “racist” physical or verbal attacks on innocent people of color feed national hysteria. They are usually followed by the embarrassing truth that causes no embarrassment, much less apologies. Instead, again for the nth time, the general leftwing argument posits that even if the event did not happen, then at least it called attention to the claim that there was no reason that it could not have happened. Among the concocted evidence of collective racism are the now hundreds of magically appearing pieces of rope or the notes with n-words plastered over dorm doors or university buildings that magically surfaced over the last three or four decades. All remind us that America has far too many oppressed for the shrinking number of oppressors, and a shortage of victimizers to supply the growing demand of the victimized. The imbalance explains the “Hands up, don’t shoot”Ferguson myth that aired ad nauseam on cable television. And we recall the doctored George Zimmerman photo and edited 911 tape, along with the New York Times’ new racial categorization of “white Hispanic.” Those props helped grow the fable of a near defenseless, diminutive teen Trayvon Martin as the object of a one-sided brutal hate crime attack by a virtually white-Germanic male bully. Almost any event can serve as the means for wider utilitarian progressive ends. Take the case of the victimized and injured Paul Pelosi. He was mysteriously attacked in his own home by a sometimes homeless, sometimes commune-living illegal alien. The assailant is a former hemp-jewelry maker, nudist, and certified crank. Sometimes, he spouted right-wing craziness. Sometimes he was living Sixties-style amid BLM and pride flags. But mostly we still have no idea of how Mr. DePape drove to?, walked to?, or rode to? the Pelosi residence or why police and news accounts seemed always to have metamorphosized. But again, who cares? The news takeaway from the Pelosi attack was that you, reader, were responsible, as a conservative American who spouts hate speech that prompts an otherwise sane DePape to act out YOUR Trump/MAGA/rightwing hatred—and, who knew?, all just before the midterm elections! More recently, a deranged shooter with a history of both mental illness and felonious behavior, begin shooting randomly, and in five instances fatally, in a gay bar in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Before the public had any facts about the shooter or the circumstances of the gruesome mass murdering, the media rushed to condemnation believing it had yet another golden moment to exploit. It raced to get out the narrative of turning an insane criminal into a tool of conservative “homophobia”—until the facts overwhelmed the lies and the shooter and the citizen hero who stopped him no longer fit the narrative, at least for now. When it turned out the killer claimed he was “non-binary” and was stopped from further carnage by a former combat veteran there in the bar with his wife and kids, facts still could not imperil the “narrative”:homophobia was on the rise due to the MAGA Trumpists and the rightwing, Christian intolerance of an ossified Colorado Springs. These creations are never retracted. Once institutionalized, they can end up in presidential speeches, and will become the stuff of more Joe Biden “semi-fascist”/”un-American” rants. Many psychodramas are also a matter of timing and closely birthed to the elections, as the Pelosi/MAGA-inspired myth attests. We may be mired in a ruinous stagflation. We may suffer near-record violent crime spikes. A destroyed border has redefined America into something like the frontiers of Rome circa AD 450. Purchasing gasoline and diesel may require not buying meat. Again, no matter. On the eve of the midterms, we were treated to another variety of patently obvious, embarrassing, and adolescent presidential psychodramas. Among them were the buyoffs of amnesty for some $500 billion in student loan debts, and amnesty for federal marijuana convictions, and a few cents of temporarily cheaper gas obtained by draining the strategic petroleum reserve. We laughed at the transparent pandering. But the Left remembered the dictum of their departed saint, the late Sen. Harry Reid. He later snarked of his pre-2012-election lies about a supposedly tax-cheating candidate Mitt Romney (“So the word is out that he has not paid any taxes for ten years. Let him prove that he has paid taxes because he hasn’t.”): “Well, they can call it whatever they want—Romney didn’t win, did he?” If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools.Plato
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THE 64 DOLLAR QUESTION

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Is Protestant Martin Luther a better Catholic than Luther-like Jorge Bergolio on Devotion to Mary & Her Immaculate Conception?

Immaculate Conception: Pope Francis cancels public act of …

Strangely, despite Francis agreeing with Luther on the heretical “doctrine of justification,” Luther seemed to have a greater devotion to the Virgin Mary than Francis according to the Catholic Culture website:

Probably the most astonishing Marian belief of Luther is his acceptance of Mary’s Immaculate Conception, which wasn’t even definitively proclaimed as dogma by the Catholic Church until 1854. Concerning this question there is some dispute, over the technical aspects of medieval theories of conception and the soul, and whether or not Luther later changed his mind. Even some eminent Lutheran scholars, however, such as Arthur Carl Piepkorn (1907-73) of Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, maintain his unswerving acceptance of the doctrine. Luther’s words follow:

It is a sweet and pious belief that the infusion of Mary’s soul was effected without original sin; so that in the very infusion of her soul she was also purified from original sin and adorned with God’s gifts, receiving a pure soul infused by God; thus from the first moment she began to live she was free from all sin” (Sermon: “On the Day of the Conception of the Mother of God,” 1527).

She is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin—something exceedingly great. For God’s grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil. (Personal {“Little”} Prayer Book, 1522).

Later references to the Immaculate Conception appear in his House sermon for Christmas (1533) and Against the Papacy of Rome (1545)…

… Luther held to the idea and devotional practice of the veneration of Mary and expressed this on innumerable occasions with the most effusive language:

The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart. (Sermon, September 1, 1522).

[She is the] highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ. ..She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures. (Sermon, Christmas, 1531).

No woman is like you. You are more than Eve or Sarah, blessed above all nobility, wisdom, and sanctity. (Sermon, Feast of the Visitation. 1537).

One should honor Mary as she herself wished and as she expressed it in the Magnificat. She praised God for his deeds. How then can we praise her? The true honor of Mary is the honor of God, the praise of God’s grace.. .Mary is nothing for the sake of herself, but for the sake of Christ…Mary does not wish that we come to her, but through her to God. (Explanation of the Magnificat, 1521).

Luther goes even further, and gives the Blessed Virgin the exalted position of “Spiritual Mother” for Christians, much the same as in Catholic piety:

It is the consolation and the superabundant goodness of God, that man is able to exult in such a treasure. Mary is his true Mother, Christ is his brother. God is his father. (Sermon. Christmas, 1522)

Mary is the Mother of Jesus and the Mother of all of us even though it was Christ alone who reposed on her knees…If he is ours, we ought to be in his situation; there where he is, we ought also to be and all that he has ought to be ours, and his mother is also our mother. (Sermon, Christmas, 1529).

[…]

His views of Mary as Mother of God and as ever-Virgin were identical to those in Catholicism, and his opinions on the Immaculate Conception, Mary’s “Spiritual Motherhood” and the use of the “Hail Mary” were substantially the same. He didn’t deny the Assumption (he certainly didn’t hesitate to rail against doctrines he opposed!), and venerated Mary in a very touching fashion which, as far as it goes, is not at all contrary to Catholic piety. [https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=788] – The Catholic Monitor and a quote from Catholic Culture

A Catholic Monitor writer as well as a Knight of the Immaculata wrote that Francis’s Amoris Laetitia appears to smear Our Blessed Mother, the Immaculate Conception, with the taint of sin:

Footnote 351 of Amoris laetitia smears Our Blessed Mother with the taint of our own sin, as though sanctification cannot or need not take place.  That is why the symbol of the alternate “queen,” the false deity which the heretics would like to foist upon us in place of the true Queen of Heaven and earth, is nothing but a bowl of dirt.

By blunting the ideal of Christian perfection, Bergoglio implicitly denies the Immaculate Conception–as, indeed, he does explicitly in other ways as well.  That is why just about the first thing he did after seizing the power of the papacy (I take Bishop Rene Gracida’s viewpoint too) was to savage the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, whose specific charism it is, to reflect the Immaculata and propagate devotion to her. [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/mary-is-miss-grace-that-is-full-of.html]

Is Francis like Martin Luther in his heresies on sin and justification?

Amoris Laetitia appears to have fallen into the heresies of Luther which are condemned by Trent and Veritatis Splendor.

Francis said of the heresy of Luther on justification which includes his teaching on sin:

“Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err.” (patheos.com/blog/scotticalt, “Pope Francis is Wrong about Luther and Justification,” April 5, 2017)

The Luther-like Francis’s concept of sin appears to be contrary to “the Sixth Commandment and to Saint Paul’s prohibition outlined in 1 Cor. 11:27-30” and the infallible Council of Trent.

Dr. Luca Gili, a professor of philosophy at the University of Quebec in Montreal, told LifeSiteNews:

“By saying that ‘there is no other interpretation’ [to guidelines that approve Communion for adulterers], the pope is stating that he is (magisterially) proposing a doctrine which is contrary to the Sixth Commandment and to Saint Paul’s prohibition outlined in 1 Cor. 11:27-30.”

Dr. Gili in speaking of heresy said:

“Any denial of a divinely revealed truth is (material) heresy, according to the definition of heresy in CIC 751. In conclusion, the pope is (allegedly) teaching a plain heresy.”
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/pope-francis-supporters-demand-faithful-catholics-accept-communion-for-adul#ampshare=https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-supporters-demand-faithful-catholics-accept-communion-for-adul]

Strangely, despite Francis agreeing with Luther on the heretical “doctrine of justification,” Luther seemed to have a greater devotion to the Virgin Mary than Francis according to the Catholic Culture website:

Probably the most astonishing Marian belief of Luther is his acceptance of Mary’s Immaculate Conception, which wasn’t even definitively proclaimed as dogma by the Catholic Church until 1854. Concerning this question there is some dispute, over the technical aspects of medieval theories of conception and the soul, and whether or not Luther later changed his mind. Even some eminent Lutheran scholars, however, such as Arthur Carl Piepkorn (1907-73) of Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, maintain his unswerving acceptance of the doctrine. Luther’s words follow:

It is a sweet and pious belief that the infusion of Mary’s soul was effected without original sin; so that in the very infusion of her soul she was also purified from original sin and adorned with God’s gifts, receiving a pure soul infused by God; thus from the first moment she began to live she was free from all sin” (Sermon: “On the Day of the Conception of the Mother of God,” 1527).

She is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin—something exceedingly great. For God’s grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil. (Personal {“Little”} Prayer Book, 1522).

Later references to the Immaculate Conception appear in his House sermon for Christmas (1533) and Against the Papacy of Rome (1545)…

… Luther held to the idea and devotional practice of the veneration of Mary and expressed this on innumerable occasions with the most effusive language:

The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart. (Sermon, September 1, 1522).

[She is the] highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ. ..She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures. (Sermon, Christmas, 1531).

No woman is like you. You are more than Eve or Sarah, blessed above all nobility, wisdom, and sanctity. (Sermon, Feast of the Visitation. 1537).

One should honor Mary as she herself wished and as she expressed it in the Magnificat. She praised God for his deeds. How then can we praise her? The true honor of Mary is the honor of God, the praise of God’s grace.. .Mary is nothing for the sake of herself, but for the sake of Christ…Mary does not wish that we come to her, but through her to God. (Explanation of the Magnificat, 1521).

Luther goes even further, and gives the Blessed Virgin the exalted position of “Spiritual Mother” for Christians, much the same as in Catholic piety:

It is the consolation and the superabundant goodness of God, that man is able to exult in such a treasure. Mary is his true Mother, Christ is his brother. God is his father. (Sermon. Christmas, 1522)

Mary is the Mother of Jesus and the Mother of all of us even though it was Christ alone who reposed on her knees…If he is ours, we ought to be in his situation; there where he is, we ought also to be and all that he has ought to be ours, and his mother is also our mother. (Sermon, Christmas, 1529).

[…]

His views of Mary as Mother of God and as ever-Virgin were identical to those in Catholicism, and his opinions on the Immaculate Conception, Mary’s “Spiritual Motherhood” and the use of the “Hail Mary” were substantially the same. He didn’t deny the Assumption (he certainly didn’t hesitate to rail against doctrines he opposed!), and venerated Mary in a very touching fashion which, as far as it goes, is not at all contrary to Catholic piety. [https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=788]

Pray an Our Father now in reparation for the sins of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”

(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”

[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:

http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:

http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of MarySHARE

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The infallibility of the pope does not mean in any way that he enjoys unlimited and arbitrary power in matters of government and teaching. The dogma of infallibility, while it defines a supreme privilege, is fixed in precise boundaries, allowing for infidelity, error, and betrayal. Otherwise in the prayers for the Supreme Pontiff there would be no need to pray “non tradat eum in animam inimicorum eius [that he may not be delivered into the hands of his enemies].” If it were impossible for the pope to cross to the enemy camp, it would not be necessary to pray for it not to happen.

“Easy Virtue”: Comfort and Ease as Basic Givens of the Liturgical Reform

 Peter Kwasniewski, PhD December 8, 2022 0 Comments

The sin of Peter recounted in Matthew 16 — “Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee” (v. 22) — is the archetype of papal sins against the Mass.

Note that Peter’s “rebuke” hinges on the avoidance of the Cross. The Mass is the re-presentation of the sacrifice of the Cross; therefore Peter’s attitude, translated into the era of the Holy Spirit, that is, the era stretching from Pentecost until the Second Coming, would be found anew if ever a successor of his tried to resist the demands — moral, ascetical, doctrinal, aesthetic — that the sacramental sacrifice places on us; if he tried to resist the burden of negative and difficult things that must be borne for our own good and that we would ignore or contradict to our harm.

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

The evangelist continues: “But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men” (Mt 16:23).
As Roberto de Mattei notes:

The infallibility of the pope does not mean in any way that he enjoys unlimited and arbitrary power in matters of government and teaching. The dogma of infallibility, while it defines a supreme privilege, is fixed in precise boundaries, allowing for infidelity, error, and betrayal. Otherwise in the prayers for the Supreme Pontiff there would be no need to pray “non tradat eum in animam inimicorum eius [that he may not be delivered into the hands of his enemies].” If it were impossible for the pope to cross to the enemy camp, it would not be necessary to pray for it not to happen. The betrayal of Peter is the example of possible infidelity that has loomed over all of the popes through the course of history, and will be so until the end of time. The pope, even if he is the supreme authority on earth, is suspended between the summit of heroic fidelity to his mandate and the abyss of apostasy that is always present. (Love for the Papacy and Filial Resistance to the Pope in the History of the Church, 84)

The word “Satan” means adversary or accuser. By his resistance to Calvary, Peter is setting himself up as an adversary of what Christ came to do and to suffer. A successor of Peter might likewise set himself up as an adversary of what Christ continues to do, above all in the mystery of the Sacrament of His Passion, the Most Holy Eucharist, enshrined within the rite of Mass. Peter is accusing Christ of, in a sense, “going too far” — of letting happen to Him that which is unfitting, or that which will demand of the disciples too much faith or effort.

The liturgy in its full ancient-medieval-Tridentine development realizes in ritual form the kingship of the crucified and glorified Christ, and in order to establish His reign over us, demands much of us: we must deny ourselves, get down on our knees, and pray, in union with the priest who offers the sacrifice on our behalf. We are tempted to resist this form of ecclesial self-discipline, to push against its demands. We are tempted, in other words, to become little “Satans,” stumbling blocks for the Lord’s mission among us, as we savor things human rather than things divine.

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

What are these human things we savor?

“Thou savourest not the things that be of God” — His liturgical Providence, the Holy Spirit leading us into the fullness of truth in our worship as well as our doctrine — “but those that be of men,” aggiornamentoressourcementNouvelle théologie, “dare we hope,” etc., a range of excuses for bracketing out and burying whole portions of our Christian tradition in order to find a more commodious niche for our modernity, pleasantly tricked out with selectively antiquarian frills.

Put more bluntly, it would seem that ease and comfort are basic givens of the liturgical reform. How so? Well, the rites were expressly designed to be:

  • easy to understand (hence, the vernacular, always spoken out loud, with priest facing people),
  • with easier postures (hence, less kneeling, and fewer variations during the liturgical year),
  • altogether briefer (hence, fewer and shorter prayers, and the multiplication of extraordinary ministers to expedite Communion),
  • with fewer difficult, i.e., perplexing, sobering, or severe, Scripture passages (hence, the removal of numerous challenging Bible verses from the lectionary and breviary),
  • prepared for by less fasting (one hour instead of three hours or from midnight),
  • and with musical styles more familiar and worldly, and less dependent on well-trained musicians.

In comparison with the traditional rites:

  • the Mass as a God-pleasing sacrifice is deemphasized, and the aspect of a welcoming fraternal meal dominates;
  • the orations are edited to remove or downplay traditional aspects of the Faith: “detachment from earthly goods and the longing for the eternal; the struggle against heresy and schism; the conversion of unbelievers; the necessity of returning to the Catholic Church and to unadulterated truth; merits, miracles, apparitions of the saints; God’s wrath against sin and the possibility of eternal damnation” (these words are from Michael Fiedrowicz);
  • the “distance” between priest and people — emphasizing Christ as the only Mediator between God and man — is canceled or relativized by vernacularity, versus populum, the permeable revolving-door sanctuary, etc.;
  • the new rite holds us by the hand with scripted responses and actions, promoting spiritual infantilism and never allowing the natural development over time of an interior life supported by devotions;
  • the new rite is much less demanding on the priest in terms of complexity of ceremonies and specificity of rubrics.

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

These are a few of the many ways in which the reformed rites cater to the tendencies of our fallen human nature, which hates discipline, effort, attentiveness, self-denial, meditation, and submission to fixed forms — although Christianized human nature gravitates toward just these things, as an intelligent sick person welcomes the proper remedies for his condition.

Why did it come crashing down?

Today’s skeptics will quickly formulate an objection. You praise the Church’s traditional discipline, but tell me: why did the whole structure come crashing down so quickly in the 1960s and beyond? Surely (the skeptics say), there must have been something wrong with what was there before — some fatal flaw or systemic weakness. It was a house of cards, a termites’ nest, a brittle façade hiding the emptiness of social routine.

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

Actually, having talked to a lot of older people, I’m convinced that the explanation is a lot simpler and less ominous. Fallen human nature loves to get a break from discipline. When people go on vacation, they often “let it all hang out”: they drink lots more beer or wine than usual, eat lots of desserts they normally might shun, binge-watch movies, don’t tuck in their shirts (or maybe don’t wear shirts at all), and so forth. We see this with Catholics who relish Fridays that happen to be “Solemnities” so that they can freely eat meat — which they are eating every other day anyway. Basically, unless we are persons of unusual virtue, we’ll gladly take advantage of any excuse to slack off.

Whatever else it was, the Catholic Church prior to Vatican II was by and large a realm of discipline, order, rules, and requirements — not always consistently followed, but consistently praised and held up, and that is exactly as it should be. Catholicism cannot exist otherwise, any more than a mammal’s body could remain coherent without a skeleton supporting it, or an organism could remain a unity without a soul giving life to it. Yes, the Faith is so much more than this kind of  structure, but it is at least this, for which there is no substitute.

Now, if you suddenly tell the entire Church: “Hey, Church, it’s all called off! Lenten fasting and Friday abstinence are gone or optional. You ladies don’t have to wear veils, you nuns can get rid of the many-layered habits. Clergy, you don’t have to study Latin, everything’s in the vernacular now; you don’t have to sweat over detailed rubrics; there aren’t eight parts of the breviary but only five (and each of those is cut way down),” etc., this is basically an announcement that we are all on perpetual vacation from school: it’s permanent recess time.

If you give people a high bar and say “You must clear it,” they will work to clear it, and if they don’t clear it, they will recognize themselves to be slackers and take it to Confession. If you say: “Here’s the low bar and it’s good enough; step right on over it or even walk around it if that makes you feel more like yourself,” how many will train for the high bar? How many, honestly, will even care about the low bar? They will probably just go off to a bar.

Church pews upholstered on the seat and the back: time to get comfy!

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

The simplest explanation for the postconciliar collapse is that the Church — by this, I mean churchmen, of course, not the Immaculate Bride of Christ who dwells in the heavenly presence of the Most Holy Trinity — simply stopped demanding asceticism as a baseline and excellence as an ideal, and fallen human nature knew how to run with that. Disordered concupiscence whooshed in to fill the abhorrent vacuum. As we know looking to the field of architecture, it takes decades or centuries to build something great, and only a few wrecking balls or bombs to level it down.

C.A. Thompson-Briggs sums up the point: “Comfort is one of the idols of modernity and one of the great enemies of beauty.” The systematic implementation of ease and comfort in the modern liturgy, together with its supporting legislation and environment, reflects and reinforces the modern Western self-centered lifestyle and its relentless excision of beauty as useless and (ironically) self-indulgent. It seems to be based on a final admission that the Enlightenment was right, after all, to define human beings as either purely rational or purely animal (depending on whether one is dealing with the more idealistic strands or the more skeptical and materialistic ones), rather than seeing man as fundamentally an aesthetic being ordered to transcendence through contemplation and subcreation, and therefore as a being urgently in need of the goods of tradition, discipline, order, and challenge in order to realize his humanity, to humanize the world around him, and to lift himself and his world to God as a sacrificial offering on the altar, at the foot of the Cross.

In short: either we savor the things of God that lift us above ourselves, a path that leads to heaven by the paradoxical way of ascesis and beauty; or we savor the things of man fleeing from God — a path that leads downwards in every way, personally and culturally. We know, thanks to St. Matthew, how Our Lord evaluates these alternatives. We know, indeed, that St. Peter exemplifies both in succession, and so do his successors, in varying degrees and ways.

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

Photo credit: Unsplash.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Peter Kwasniewski, PhD

Peter Kwasniewski, PhD

Dr. Peter Kwasniewski is a graduate of Thomas Aquinas College and The Catholic University of America who taught at the International Theological Institute in Austria, the Franciscan University of Steubenville’s Austria Program, and Wyoming Catholic College, which he helped establish in 2006. Today he is a full-time writer and speaker on traditional Catholicism whose work appears online at, among others, OnePeterFiveNew Liturgical MovementLifeSiteNewsThe Remnant, and Catholic Family News. He has published eighteen books, including Reclaiming Our Roman Catholic Birthright: The Genius and Timeliness of the Traditional Latin Mass (Angelico, 2020), The Ecstasy of Love in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Emmaus, 2021), and Are Canonizations Infallible? Revisiting a Disputed Question (Arouca, 2021). His work has been translated into at least eighteen languages. Visit his website at www.peterkwasniewski.com.

www.peterkwasniewski.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The current “media”—loosely defined as the old major newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Post, the network news channels, MSNBC and CNN, PBS and NPR, the online news aggregators like Google, Apple, and Yahoo, and the social media giants like the old Twitter and Facebook—are corrupt. 

How Corrupt is 

a Corrupt Media?

The media has ceased to exist,

and the public plods on by assuming as

true whatever the media suppresses and as

false whatever the media covers.

By: Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

December 4, 2022

(Emphasis added)

The current “media”—loosely defined as the old major newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Post, the network news channels, MSNBC and CNN, PBS and NPR, the online news aggregators like Google, Apple, and Yahoo, and the social media giants like the old Twitter and Facebook—are corrupt. 

They have adopted in their news coverage a utilitarian view that noble progressive ends justify almost any unethical means to obtain them. The media is unapologetically fused with the Democratic Party, the bicoastal liberal elite, and the progressive agenda. 

The result is that the public cannot trust that the news it hears or reads is either accurate or true. The news as presented by these outlets has been carefully filtered to suppress narratives deemed inconvenient or antithetical to the political objectives of these entities while inflating themes deemed useful. 

This bias now accompanies increasing (and increasingly obvious) journalistic incompetence. Lax standards reflect weaponized journalism schools and woke ideology that short prior basic requisites of writing and ethical protocols of quoting and sourcing. In sum, a corrupt media that is ignorant, arrogant, and ideological explains why few now trust what it delivers.

Suppression

Once a story is deemed antithetical to left-wing agendas, there arises a collective effort to smother it. Suppression is achieved both by neglect and by demonizing others who report an inconvenient truth as racists, conspiracist “right-wingers,” and otherwise irredeemable. 

The Hunter Biden laptop story is the locus classicus. Social media branded the authentic laptop as Russian disinformation. That was a lie. But the deception did not stop them from censoring and squashing those who reported the truth. 

Instead of carefully examining the contents of the laptop or interrogating Biden-company players such as Tony Bobulinksi, the media hyped the ridiculous disinformation hoax as a mechanism for suppressing the damaging pre-election story altogether.

Joe Biden’s cognitive state was another suppression story. The media simply stifled the truth that 2020 candidate Biden was unable to conduct a normal campaign due to his frailty and non-compos-mentis status. Few fully reported his often cruel and racist outbursts of the “lying-dog-faced-pony-soldier” and “you ain’t black”/“terrorist” sort. 

The #MeToo media predictably quashed the Tara Reade disclosure. Journalists turned on her in the manner that they previously had insisted was sexist and defamatory “blame-the-victim” smearing. 

Joe Biden has long suffered from a sick tic of creepily intruding into the private space of young women and preteen girls: blowing their hair, talking into their ears, squeezing their necks, hugging in full-body embraces—all for far too long. In other words, Biden should have expected the Charlie Rose or the Donald Trump Access Hollywood media treatment. Instead, he was de facto exonerated by collective media silence. To this day, despite staffers’ efforts to corral his wandering hands and head, he occasionally reverts to form with his creepy fixations with younger women. 

Ask the media today which administration surveilled journalists and they will likely cry “Trump!” Yet their own sensationalist reporting that the IRS was weaponized by Trump was proven a lie when the inspector general noted Trump never went after either James Comey or Andrew McCabe. And it was an untruth comparable to the smear that “nuclear secrets” and “nuclear codes” were hidden away at Mar-a-Lago or that Donald Trump sought to profit from the trove. Nor does anyone remember that Barack Obama went after the Associated Press reporters and Fox News Channel’s James Rosen. Nor do they care that Biden sought to birth an Orwellian Ministry of Truth censorship bureau.

Fantasy

The media does not just suppress, but concocts. The entire Russian-collusion hoax—Robert Mueller’s vain 22-month and $40 million investigation—was a complete waste of time on the one hand, but on the other an effective effort to destroy the effectiveness of an elected president. 

How many print and television celebrity journalists declared that Trump would shortly resign, be jailed, or impeached over the pee-pee tape or Christopher Steele’s other mishmash of lies? The problem for the media in promoting the fallacious dossier was not just that it was untrue, but that it was so awfully written, so obviously poorly sourced, and so Drudge Report-like amateurishly sensational that it could not appear factual to any sane person—other than an agenda-driven and addled journalist who found it useful.

Do we remember the Hillary Clinton-approved Alfa Bank/Trump Tower fable that is now resurfacing for a second try? 

Or the Jussie Smollett caper that trumped even the Brett Kavanaugh-as-teenage-assaulter and rapist lie? Or the Covington kids fabrications that trumped the Duke lacrosse hoax that trumped the “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” myth that trumped the “white Hispanic,” doctored photo/edited 911 call smear about George Zimmerman? 

Recall Trump’s supposed “immigration jails” and “kids in cages” at the border—in truth both not cages and in fact birthed by Obama. 

Then there was Trump’s supposedly impeachable offense of purportedly canceling military aid to Ukraine so that he could allegedly hound the innocent Biden family—rather than delaying, but not canceling, offensive arms vetoed by the Obama Administration for the prescient worry that the Biden family had left a trail of corruption in Ukraine.  

Who ran with the “voter suppression” untruth that Stacey Abrams was the “real” governor of Georgia or the yarn that Donald Trump was illegitimately elected? How exactly did Jeffery Epstein and Harvey Weinstein operate as sexual perverts and high-profile, liberal-benefacting deviants for years without media scrutiny? Who created the cable news myth of now-felon Michael Avenatti as presidential timber? 

Chronological Manipulation

Why, after the midterms, did we suddenly learn that Donald Trump did not, as in the case of Barack Obama’s Lois Lerner skullduggery, manipulate the IRS for political purposes to go after James Comey and Andrew McCabe? Why suddenly post-election did we read that his presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago really did not contain “nuclear codes” and “nuclear secrets” or stuff intended for sale? Why did we learn after November 8 that a special counsel was suddenly appointed? Why did we discover the Ponzi scheme of Sam Bankman-Fried only after the midterms and why is he treated as an aw-shucks teen in bum drag rather than a calculating and conniving crook?

The answer is the same as why, just days before the 2016 election, we were assured suddenly by the media that the DNC’s planted stories about Christopher Steele’s dossier “proved” that Trump was a Russian stooge. 

Asymmetry 

When did the media finally dribble out that Obama’s memoir Dreams From My Father was chock full of lies and thus was intended all along to be read as “impressionistic” rather than factual? 

We only learned belatedly that Hillary Clinton did not brave the front lines in virtual combat in Bosnia. We were assured that she was completely out of the loop on the Uranium One deal and thus knew nothing about the cash that poured into the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton’s honoraria from Russian sources. 

Did the media ever fully report that Hillary Clinton: 

1) broke the law by using a personal server to communicate while Secretary of State; 

2) lied about the missing emails by claiming they were all personal about “yoga” and “weddings” and such; 

3) destroyed subpoenaed evidence by smashing her devices; 

4) had her husband accidentally bump into Attorney General Loretta Lynch on a Phoenix tarmac who was supposedly investigating Clinton at the time; and 

5) became our first major election denialist by declaring “Russian collusion” to be true, Donald Trump to be illegitimately elected, and the 2016 balloting to be “rigged”?

Unethical Behavior 

Our once lions of network news were long ago revealed to have feet of clay. Dan Rather insisted that “fake but true”memos “proved” George W. Bush got special exemptions from military service. Brian Williams fabricated an entire Walter-Mitty fantasy existence with ease. The WikiLeaks Podesta trove revealed blue-chip reporters checking in with the Clinton campaign and the DNC to “fact check” and brainstorm their pre-publication puff pieces. 

Throughout the Obama years, Ben Rhodes, the failed novelist and deputy national security advisor distorted U.S. foreign policy, as CBS News, overseen by his brother, warped its coverage of him. 

Do we remember the commentary on MSNBC of the brilliant Vanderbilt professor and MSNBC “analyst,” presidential historian Jon Meacham? He periodically praised Joe Biden’s eloquence and moving addresses without informing his audience that he contributed to or indeed helped write what he gushed about. No problem. Even after finally being fired, Meacham is still at it, offering his input on Biden’s September 1, Phantom-of-the-Opera “un-American” rant.

CNN Sums It Up

The long, slow death of Jeffery Zucker’s CNN is emblematic of all the mortal sins listed above of our present-day corrupt media.

It is ancient history now and thus forgotten that the self-righteous MSNBC anchorman Lawrence O’Donnell falsely claimed that Deutsche Bank documents would prove that Russian oligarchs co-signed a loan application for Donald Trump. 

Over a decade ago, CNN’s Candy Crowley—remember this impartial “moderator” of the second 2012 presidential debate?—infamously transformed before our very television eyes into an active and shameless partisan by attacking candidate Mitt Romney. CNN commentator Donna Brazile topped Crowley when she unethically leaked primary-debate questions to candidate Hillary Clinton. When pressed, Brazile serially denied her role.

CNN’s former Obamaite Jim Sciutto is known as a serial offender of journalistic ethics and was recently the subject of an internal investigation. Sciutto has also alleged, falsely, that the CIA had yanked a high-level spy out of Moscow because of President Trump’s supposedly dangerously reckless handling of classified information. Sciutto joined CNN’s Carl Bernstein and Marshall Cohen to falsely report that Lanny Davis’ client Michael Cohen would soon assert that Trump had prior knowledge of an upcoming meeting between his son and Russian interests.

Another CNN trio of Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Harris were forced out from CNN for their mythologies that the Trump-hating Anthony Scaramucci was directly involved in a $10 billion Russian fund.

CNN’s Julian Zelizer fabricated his tall tale that Donald Trump never reiterated America’s commitment to honor NATO’s critical Article 5 guarantee. The quartet of CNN’s Gloria Borger, Eric Lichtblau, Jake Tapper, and Brian Rokus all were exposed wrongly assuring that former FBI director James Comey would unequivocally contradict President Trump’s prior assertion that Comey had told him he was not under investigation. 

CNN reporter Manu Raju in December 2017 trafficked in lots of fake news stories that Donald Trump, Jr. supposedly had prior access to the hacked WikiLeaks documents. And he offered another fable that Trump, Jr. would be indicted by Mueller’s special-counsel investigation. But then, who at CNN did not blast out such “bombshells” and “walls are closing in” lies?

The once supposedly great Chris Cuomo—finally fired for softball incestuous interviews with his brother Andrew while serving as confidant to his sibling’s sexual-harassment dilemmas—had been caught on tape screaming obscenities. He also lied on the air when he assured a CNN audience in 2016 that it was illegal for citizens to examine the just-released WikiLeaks emails.

Julia Ioffe was eagerly hired by CNN after Politico fired her for tweeting that the president and his daughter Ivanka might have had an incestuous sexual relationship. CNN Anderson Cooper was every bit as creepy. He harangued a pro-Trump panelist with “If he [Trump] took a dump on his desk, you would defend it!”

Erstwhile CNN religious “expert” Reza Aslan was not so subtle. He trashed Trump as “this piece of sh**.” The late CNN cooking show guru Anthony Bourdain openly joked about poisoning Trump with hemlock. Recall CNN New Year’s Eve host Kathy Griffin posing with a bloody facsimile of Trump’s severed head. Was there something in the CNN contract that stipulated CNN journalists had to be obscene, vulgar, and threatening? 

The CNN circus also hired as a “security analyst” the admitted liar James Clapper. So, was it any surprise that on spec Clapper did what he was hired to do—by falsely claiming that President Trump was a veritable Russian asset?

But for that matter, former CIA director Michael Hayden preposterously alleged that Trump’s immigration policies resembled those in the death camps of Nazi Germany. Was it any wonder either that CNN host Sally Kohn and her roundtable panelists raised their hands to reverberate the “hands up, don’t shoot” lie of the Ferguson shooting?

Do the bias, invective, and lack of ethics of the media even matter anymore? 

In truth, media corruption has changed the course of recent history. 

Had the true nature of the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop been reported, the 2020 voters have polled that the revelation may well have made a difference because they would not have voted for a candidate so clearly compromised by foreign interests. 

Tell the full story of death, destruction, arson, looting, and injured police of the post-George Floyd rioting, and what emerges is not the MSNBC denial of violence or the August 2020 CNN lie of a “fiery but mostly peaceful” sort of idealistic protestors.

The Kavanaugh and Smollett fake news accounts helped further to tear apart the country and greenlighted the new assaults on the Supreme Court, from Senator Chuck Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) rants and threats to the would-be assassin who turned up near the Kavanaugh residence. 

The Russian collusion hoax and the first impeachment media hysteria virtually ruined a presidency and have had grave foreign-policy consequences vis à vis Russia.

The media, moreover, matter-of-factly assumed Twitter was an arm of the Democratic Party. Mark Zuckerberg and the FBI worked together to suppress any news embarrassing to the Biden campaign. Do not expect much media coverage of Elon Musk’s serial disclosures of Twitter’s efforts to suppress free communications.

No thanks to the media, after nearly three years we are finally learning that the Wuhan Lab proved the likely source of the COVID pandemic, and that the media-sainted Dr. Anthony Fauci subsidized gain-of-function viral research in Wuhan. 

Despite the lies, Americans assumed that Officer Brian Sicknick was not killed by Trump supporters as reported. The public shrugged “of course” when the media did its best to suppress the name of the Capitol policeman who lethally shot Ashli Babbitt for attempting to go through a broken window inside the Capitol. And on and on.

In sum, there is no media. It has ceased to exist, and the public plods on by assuming as true whatever the Pravda-like news outlets suppress and as false whatever they cover.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SAVE JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS

Friend, I have a critical update for you regarding the message I sent the other day. 
 
The Democrats’ petition to impeach Justice Clarence Thomas, which already had OVER 1 MILLION SIGNATURES, is growing larger by the minute! 
 
The Democrats are working day in and day out to gain more signatures to impeach Justice Thomas, and  we must rally like never before to show the radical Left that we support him.SUPPORT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS Clarence Thomas has done so much for our country, and we cannot let Joe Biden and his woke mafia try to remove him from our justice system. SUPPORT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS Please, Friend, we need loyal patriots like you to step up TODAY and help State GOP fight against the Dems vicious attacks on our conservative justices.  
 
———- Forwarded message ———

Subject: Justice Clarence Thomas doesn’t deserve this
From: Andrew, State GOP HQ
To: rhg1923@gmail.com

Friend, have you heard the news?! It is beyond awful. 
 
The radical Left’s newest attack is to impeach Justice Clarence Thomas, and to make matters worse – they started a petition which already has over 1 MILLION signatures!! 
 
Justice Thomas has consistently served as a voice of reason on the court and has been a PIVOTAL part of our Supreme Court – without him, who knows where our country would be right now! 
 
We cannot let Joe Biden and his woke mafia continue to slander Clarence Thomas’ name on the warpath to destroy our justice system.
 
Please join State GOP HQ and rally around him by signing our card to show our support, Friend:SUPPORT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS Friend, it is critical that we have all hands on deck to stand against the Democrats’ vicious attacks and to show that we show support for Justice Thomas and ALL Conservative justices. 
 
The radical Left wants to destroy our country’s ideals and rewrite history to align with their agenda, and we cannot let that happen. We must come together and fight for our conservative leaders.SUPPORT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS 
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

READ THIS, WEEP, AND RESOLVE TO DO BETTER

350 Action Responds to Georgia Runoff Results

The results from Georgia’s Senate runoff election show that Senator Raphael Warnock has won reelection, beating GOP challenger Herschel Walker. While Democrats had already secured control of the Senate, Warnock’s reelection marks a crucial win for climate champions, as it marks an outright senate majority with 51 Democratic senators rather than a 50-50 split with Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris casting tie-breaking votes.   

350 Action, the electoral wing of 350.org, worked in the lead up to the Georgia run-offs to engage our base to get out the vote efforts on behalf of key climate champions across the US, including Raphael Warnock.

May Boeve, 350 Action executive director made the following statement:

“Raphael Warnock’s win is yet another testament to people power, and to the grassroots community-led efforts that got out the vote in every way possible. Georgia voters showed up in record numbers for this runoff election and ultimately chose to vote for reason and progress. Warnock has a clear track record of supporting renewable energy and climate policy, while Walker is a climate change-denier who wants us to remain dependent on fossil fuels.”

“The crucial senate majority secured by Warnock’s win will help key legislators implement real solutions and ensure that climate legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act protects our communities from further devastating climate impacts. Warnock’s win also better protects climate champions’ ability to block new fossil fuel projects like Senator Manchin’s ‘Dirty Deal,’ which he continues to push.”

“With this final senate race now decided, the midterm results send a clear and decisive message: we can and must move forward the important work of advocating for more bold climate action. While a divided Congress poses some legislative challenges, voters have proven that climate is a priority for them, and we have a clear opportunity to organize for our people and the climate.”

###

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

MORE BAD NEWS FOR THE UNITED STATES!!! UNDER PRESIDENT JOSEPH BIDEN IT IS ONE DISASTER FOR AMERICA AFTER ANOTHER!!! WE HAVE NOT RECOVERED FROM THE DISASTER OF AFGHANISTAN AN NOW WE ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS THE DISASTROUS FINAL DESTRUCION OF UKRAINE BY VLADAMIR PUTIN.

HOW MANY MORE DISASTERS FOR THE UNITED STATES CAN JOSEPH BIDEN INFLICT ON OUR NATION

Former Advisor to the Secretary of Defense says the Ukraine War will end soon with an Afghanistan-like humiliation for Biden and the United States

Macgregor appears to cite intel sources for his numbers and timetable—and I assume he really does have good sources. He says the offensive will happen “not sooner than 12/10 and not later than 12/19.” It will involve something like 540,000 troops with 1,500 tanks, thousands of other armored vehicles, huge numbers of helicopters, fixed wing aircraft, and bombers. These are numbers he says that have been confirmed by US intel.

– Mark Wauck [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/doug-macgregors-timetable-and-scale?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=473679&post_id=89073832&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email]

Modern Diplomacy reports that “Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.), who was the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration” says that “the next phase of the Ukrainian War will not only destroy the Ukrainian state. It will also demolish the last vestiges of the postwar liberal order”:

The Biden administration repeatedly commits the unpardonable sin in a democratic society of refusing to tell the American people the truth: contrary to the Western media’s popular “Ukrainian victory” narrative, which blocks any information that contradicts it, Ukraine is not winning and will not win this war, notes in his new article Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.), who was the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration.

Months of heavy Ukrainian casualties, resulting from an endless series of pointless attacks against Russian defenses in Southern Ukraine, have dangerously weakened Ukrainian forces.

Predictably, NATO’s European members, which bear the brunt of the war’s impact on their societies and economies, are growing more disenchanted with Washington’s Ukrainian proxy war…

Biden’s “take no prisoners” conduct of U.S. foreign policy means the outcome of the next phase of the Ukrainian War will not only destroy the Ukrainian state. It will also demolish the last vestiges of the postwar liberal order and produce a dramatic shift in power and influence across Europe, especially in Berlin, away from Washington to Moscow and, to a limited extent, to Beijing, writes Douglas Macgregor.[https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2022/12/05/douglas-macgregor-russia-will-establish-victory-on-its-own-terms/]

Pray an Our Father now in reparation for the sins of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”

(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”

[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:

http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:

http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of MarySHARE

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Former Advisor to the Secretary of Defense says the Ukraine War will end soon with an Afghanistan-like humiliation for Biden

Macgregor appears to cite intel sources for his numbers and timetable—and I assume he really does have good sources. He says the offensive will happen “not sooner than 12/10 and not later than 12/19.” It will involve something like 540,000 troops with 1,500 tanks, thousands of other armored vehicles, huge numbers of helicopters, fixed wing aircraft, and bombers. These are numbers he says that have been confirmed by US intel.

– Mark Wauck [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/doug-macgregors-timetable-and-scale?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=473679&post_id=89073832&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email]

Modern Diplomacy reports that “Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.), who was the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration” says that “the next phase of the Ukrainian War will not only destroy the Ukrainian state. It will also demolish the last vestiges of the postwar liberal order”:

The Biden administration repeatedly commits the unpardonable sin in a democratic society of refusing to tell the American people the truth: contrary to the Western media’s popular “Ukrainian victory” narrative, which blocks any information that contradicts it, Ukraine is not winning and will not win this war, notes in his new article Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.), who was the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration.

Months of heavy Ukrainian casualties, resulting from an endless series of pointless attacks against Russian defenses in Southern Ukraine, have dangerously weakened Ukrainian forces.

Predictably, NATO’s European members, which bear the brunt of the war’s impact on their societies and economies, are growing more disenchanted with Washington’s Ukrainian proxy war…

Biden’s “take no prisoners” conduct of U.S. foreign policy means the outcome of the next phase of the Ukrainian War will not only destroy the Ukrainian state. It will also demolish the last vestiges of the postwar liberal order and produce a dramatic shift in power and influence across Europe, especially in Berlin, away from Washington to Moscow and, to a limited extent, to Beijing, writes Douglas Macgregor.[https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2022/12/05/douglas-macgregor-russia-will-establish-victory-on-its-own-terms/]

Pray an Our Father now in reparation for the sins of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”

(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”

[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:

http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:

http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of MarySHARE

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

YOU CANNOT EVER SAY THAT YOU WERE NOT WARNED!!!

Christ or Chaos

Home»Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part nineteen

Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part nineteen 

The previous eighteen parts of this series have dealt with many aspects of Wuhan/China//CCP/Red Chinese/Covid-19/SARS Cov-2/Coronavirus. My intention this time is summarize some of the more recent developments by providing readers with access to various sources documenting facts about: (1) how the so-called “vaccines” how produced massive health problems, including thousands of sudden deaths in people of all ages, especially among the young, while not protecting anyone from the virus, which is being spread presently by the spike proteins being shed from the bodies of the vaccinated; (2) how the “vaccines” and the shedding they produce is changing the human genome and affecting the bodies of even the unvaccinaed; (3) Anthony Fauci’s embrace of the Red Chinese model of social repression by mans of lockdowns and efforts to label as “misinformation” all oposition to his schemes of dealing a man-made virus that had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology as other elites our futures as slaves to be granted access to even basic life-saving treatments and entry to various stores on the basis of the parameters established in their vaccine passports that are portals to our own imprisonment at the hands of the master class; and (4) concluding remarks to remind readers that God Himself is permitting this all to happen for His own greater honor and glory and for our own sanctification and salvation.

I. Sudden Deaths Keep Multiplying

We live in a world where most people are incapable of using basic logic and common sense to draw conclusions from that which is obvious to the rational, logical, and sensible. The masses have been so manipulated by the high priests and priestesses of popular culture into believing that which is obvious is nothing other than “disinformation.” Assurances are given by those priests and priestesses that those who state the obvious as such are the short of people who need to be censored and ostracized and, if possible, stripped of all access to social media platforms. Those among the disseminators of “disinformation” who are physicians, including those who are degreed and published academicians, or scientists must be stripped of their professional credentials and denied the right to make a living in their chosen fields despite decades of unquestioned excellence in patient care and/or genuine scholarship.

Yet it is that the news stories speak for themselves as each proves what Dr. Peter McCullough, the noted cardiologist and epidemiologist who spoke out in 20202 against the failed cookie-cutter “protocols” designed for the treatment of those infected with the coronavirus that were developed by the likes of Drs. Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, and Francis Collins and mandated for use by the United States for Disease Control that would up causing untold thousands of patients to die, has stated repeatedly the sudden deaths of otherwise healthy people without any antecedent disease or condition: “It’s the vaccine until proven otherwise.”

Here are six news reports of these stories. The first was reported without any interest in determining any link between the vaccines, especially the mRNA gene therapy treatments whose spike proteins have made the vaccinated sick in all too many instances and have caused others to get the virus by means of vaccine shedding, and the sudden deaths that are happening more and more frequently. The second report, though, was written by those who understand the connection that is denied almost universally by other journalists while the third simply reported a family’s belief about their daughter’s sudden death being caused by the “vaccines.” The fourth is straight-forward reporting about an Irish teen’s death three weeks after getting jabbed, and fifth is a report about a man who says that he has difficulty showering after getting jabbed and thence developing two blood clots in his heart. The final report is about a link between the jabs and the onset of seizures in people who have never had them before:

Country singer-songwriter Jake Flint has died, Fox News Digital confirmed. He was 37 years old. 

Flint, an up-and-coming star, died Saturday, just hours after he married his fiancée, his longtime publicist, Clif Doyal, confirmed to The Oklahoman.

Flint’s cause of death hasn’t been determined. 

“He was not only a client, he was a dear friend and just a super nice guy,” Doyal told the outlet. “As you can see from the outpouring on social media, he was loved by everybody. 

“I think a lot of it was just that he was a people person, and he had an amazing sense of humor. He made everybody laugh, and he made everybody feel welcome. He was an ambassador for Oklahoma Red Dirt music.”

On Tuesday, Flint’s widow, Brenda Flint, shared a heartbreaking post on Facebook.

“We should be going through wedding photos but instead I have to pick out clothes to bury my husband in,” she wrote. “People aren’t meant to feel this much pain. My heart is gone and I just really need him to come back. I can’t take much more. I need him here.” 

Musician Mike Hosty, who performed at the wedding, recalled Flint having “a big heart.” 

“He was a singer-songwriter, through and through and just a big personality. A big heart, and [he’d] bend over backwards to do anything for you,” Hosty shared with The Oklahoman. “When any musician asks you to play at their wedding, it’s one of those most important days … and it’s always an honor.”

Flint’s former manager and friend, Brenda Cline, also paid tribute to the late singer, noting that she “loved him much like a son.”

“With a broken heart and in deep grief I must announce that Jake Flint has tragically passed away,” she wrote on Facebook alongside a photo of the two. “I’ve tried several times today to make a post, but you can’t comment on what you can’t process. The photo below is when Jake and I excitedly signed our artist management contract. 

“That was the beginning of a wonderful friendship and partnership,” she shared. “Jake was even more than that to me, I loved him much like a son. The funniest, most hilarious, hardest working, dedicated artist I have ever worked with in my career. We were just about to embark on some business together after he and Brenda got married- which was yesterday. Yes-yesterday. Jake has a million friends and I’m not sure how everyone will cope with this tragic loss.

“We need prayers- it’s all so surreal. Please please pray for his new wife Brenda, Jake’s precious mother, his sister and the rest of his family and friends. This is going to be incredibly difficult for so many. We love you Jake and in our hearts forever.”

Flint released four studio albums in his career, beginning with his 2016 record “I’m Not OK.” He also was named breakout artist of the year at the We Are Tulsa Music Awards in 2018, Entertainment Weekly reported. (Country singer Jake Flint dead at 37, hours after wedding.)

Reports surfaced on Tuesday that a recently hired Envoy Air pilot had collapsed and been pronounced dead shortly after taking off from Chicago O’Hare International Airport en route to Columbus, Ohio.

Captain Patrick Ford of the American Eagle Embraer 175 passed out at the controls at 7:59 p.m. on Saturday, November 19, shortly after the plane had taken off from the runway, Alex Berenson reported.

A recording of the incident shows that Captain Ford was talking to an air traffic controller when his voice suddenly stopped.

ENY3556: Tower, Envoy 3556…

A few seconds later, the controller asked anxiously, “Can I help you?”

“…3556, we need to return, captain is incapacitated,” Ford’s copilot, Captain Brandon Hendrickson, told air traffic control about 30 minutes after take-off from the airport.

Captain Hendrickson took control of the plane and managed to land safely.

Ford was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead. His cause of death was not immediately released.

The vice president of flight operations at Envoy Air released a statement following the incident.

“Despite heroic efforts to revive him, Captain in training, Patrick Ford, passed away,” Ric Wilson, the Vice President of Flight Operations at Envoy Air, said in a message to fellow pilots. “We are deeply saddened by this loss.”

“Sincere thanks to Line Check Airman, Captain Brandon Hendrickson, for his leadership and professionalism in the safe handling of his aircraft, passengers, and crew,” Wilson continued.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has opened an investigation regarding the incident.

The number of pilots who have passed out or fainted while flying, or who have died as a result, has increased in recent months.

A Boeing flight commander died suddenly during a flight from Novokuznetsk to St Petersburg in Russia in September, according to a report from a Russian news outlet.

The co-pilot had to make an emergency landing at Omsk airport, but the commander died before he could receive medical assistance.

“The resuscitation ambulance team arrived at the airport ten minutes before the plane landed. The team stated the death of the pilot before providing medical assistance,” the Ministry of Health of the Omsk Region said.

Another pilot reportedly “fainted” at 30,000 feet, prompting the plane to make an emergency landing in Greece last August.

“One fuming passenger claimed the ordeal had delayed the start of their holiday by eight hours. They said their family of four was given a €15 euro voucher each which covered a “basic meal,” the outlet reported. According to passengers, Jet2 does not compensate for delays due to medical emergencies.

The flight was rerouted as a “precautionary measure,” according to a representative from Jet2.

Commercial aviation news site Aviation Herald reported that two pilots on a flight from Sudan to Ethiopia last August had apparently fallen asleep and missed their landing.

“The incident took place on board an Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 737-800 en route from Khartoum to Addis Ababa, the report said, “when the pilots fell asleep” and “the aircraft continued past the top of descent,” according to CNN.

A reader reached out to Gateway Pundit last June 2022, saying that an air traffic controller who worked in the management in Madrid, Spain, anonymously tipped his wife that there were 28 unscheduled emergency landings in May 2022 due to medical issues associated with people losing consciousness compared to only one or two in a normal year. However, the Gateway Pundit was unable to verify this information.

“Our source and her colleagues at work had discretely discussed the total numbers of un-scheduled, emergency landings due to medical issues that involved un-consciousness as having been ~25-30+ per month since the beginning of 2022 vs. a total normal figure of ~1-2 per YEAR across all Spanish airports during pre-vax roll-out years.” (Pilot Dies Suddenly After Collapsing Shortly After Takeoff from Chicago Airport.)

The Irish Times reported:

Doctors who treated an elderly Longford woman who died following an unexplained series of seizures last year told an inquest it was possible that her death was linked to an adverse reaction to a COVID-19 vaccine.

However, two hospital consultants who treated the patient, Bridget Kerr (86), also stressed it was not in their area of expertise to state definitively that a reaction to the Pfizer vaccine was an explanation for her death.

An inquest at Dublin District Coroner’s Court heard a postmortem on the body of Ms. Kerr, a mother of seven from Cooleeney, Dublin Road, Longford, was inconclusive in establishing the cause of her death. Evidence was heard that several other possible explanations including stroke, brain tumor and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) had been ruled out.

Ms. Kerr died at the Mater Misericordiae Hospital in Dublin on April 27, 2021, after being transferred there from the Midlands Regional Hospital in Mullingar after suffering a number of seizures. Her family claims their mother only became unwell after receiving the COVID vaccine from her local GP two months earlier. (Family of Woman Who Died From Seizures Believes Death Linked to COVID Vaccine.)

The death last year of a 14-year-old Irish teen three weeks after he received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has sparked an investigation that could take years, officials involved in an inquest into the teen’s death said this week.

As part of the “considerable investigation,” authorities said they will request safety information about the vaccine from Pfizer.

Joseph McGinty, a secondary school student from Achill Island, Ireland, received the Pfizer vaccine on Aug. 20, 2021. On Sept. 1, 2021, he was hospitalized overnight at Mayo University Hospital and discharged the following day.

On Sept. 8, 2021, McGinty revisited the hospital for review. He died at home on Sept. 13, 2021. 

Patricia McGinty formally identified her son’s remains on the day of his death but “has very little recollection of the morning in question,” the family’s attorney, Rita Kilroy, told the court.

The coroner involved in the case, Pat O’Connor, called McGinty’s death “a matter of significant public concern.”

“The circumstances of Joseph McGinty’s death is that COVID vaccination was administered to him [and] that there appears to have been either a reaction or a significant change in his medical circumstances following the administration of the vaccine and that subsequently, unfortunately, Master McGinty died,” O’Connor said in Monday’s hearing.

Kilroy told the court this week, “We would perceive there to be a concern for public health and safety and potential for recurrence in two circumstances.”

An inquest is a formal investigation conducted by a coroner in order to determine how someone died. The purpose of an inquest is limited to establishing the identity of the deceased individual as well as where, when and how they died.

At the request of Kilroy, O’Connor agreed to make a request for legal aid and legal advice for the McGinty family under Section 60 of the Coroners Act, 1962.

The inquest into McGinty’s death will resume on Dec. 20.

Studies link COVID-19 vaccines, including Pfizer’s, to negative health outcomes — especially among young men — including death

In June 2021, The Defender reported on the death of 13-year-old Jacob Clynick just three days after he received the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declined to investigate Clynick’s death, even though the death was reported to the agency’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 11, 2022, there have been nine deaths reported to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines among children ages 6 months to 5 years, 31 deaths reported among children 5 to 12 years old and 133 deaths among teens 12 to 18 years old.

Last month, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, M.D., Ph.D., recommended against mRNA COVID-19 vaccination of males ages 18 to 39 years given the results of a study that found an 84% increase in the risk of cardiac death among young adult males within 28 days of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. 

Since March, Florida has recommended against mRNA COVID-19 vaccination of healthy children and adolescents younger than 18.

On Sept. 30, Sweden announced it would no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccination for children ages 12 to 17 and in Denmark, COVID-19 vaccines are not recommended for anyone under 50 years old. (Teen’s Death 3 Weeks After Pfizer Vaccine Triggers Investigation.)

This is all much more than merely “circumstantial” or anecdotal evidence as there comes a point when one has to admit that the “smoke” is caused by actual fires.

The public, though, has been conditioned not even to suspect that the gene therapy jabs have any connection with these deaths although there is much empirical evidence being amassed to prove it to those who have a modicum of intellectual curiosity and honesty to accept:

While we will be discussing the most unwelcome news of increased death rates, I am happy to report that a leading British Member of Parliament, Andrew Bridgen brought up, in the UK parliament no less, the relationship between vaccination and excess deaths.

(After this speech, Andrew was suspended from Parliament for 7 days for a supposedly “unrelated offense.”)

Where did Andrew Bridgen get his (correct) idea? I am not sure, but I posted an original analysis statistically tying “excess mortality” to vaccination rate by country on August 30, 2022.

Obviously not claiming that he somehow got it through me — I hope that many other people performed similar analyses, and one of them was noticed by Mr. Bridgen. The more people analyze this data, the better. I am happy.

New Data Looks Even Worse.

I decided to re-do the calculation of excess mortality vs. vaccine, or booster uptake, using two more months’ worth of mortality data.

I use the same exact methodology as in my “proven relationship” article. Please read it if you are interested in details or want to replicate the results. Instead of weeks 10 to 35, I now analyze “excess mortality” in weeks 20 to 44 (to be precise, the max week available up to week 44 in the short-term mortality database – the data has a lag). Everything else stayed the same.

A few notes on the data above:

  • The least vaccinated country Bulgaria has NEGATIVE excess mortality (lowest of all).
  • Chile really had more boosters given out than it has people due to multiple boosters per person, and is experiencing the HIGHEST excess mortality.
  • Sweden, sadly, moved into positive excess mortality territory, although I am glad to say that it is still low.

The questions I want to explore is: Is there an association between vaccine or booster uptake and excess mortality in Weeks 20-44? Did the association get weaker or stronger compared to weeks 10-35?

We can see that both vaccination rates (number of fully vaccinated people per 100), as well as booster doses administered per 100 persons, are VERY STRONGLY ASSOCIATED WITH EXCESS MORTALITY. Both have very low P-values, which suggests that this association is highly unlikely to have happened by random chance.

Here’s the worst part: During weeks 10-35, the vaccination rate explained only 27% of the variation in excess mortality, and the booster rate explained only 40% of excess mortality. (the so-called R-Squared). (see the previous article on this topic for regressions)

During weeks 20-44, both vaccination and booster rates explain NEARLY HALF or excess mortality variation (49% for both). That’s a lot greater explanatory power!

This means that over time, the strength of the association between excess mortality and vaccination is INCREASING! (Association Between Vaccines and Excess Mortality Getting Stronger – And Is Discussed in UK Parliament.)

The death last year of a 14-year-old Irish teen three weeks after he received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has sparked an investigation that could take years, officials involved in an inquest into the teen’s death said this week.

As part of the “considerable investigation,” authorities said they will request safety information about the vaccine from Pfizer.

Joseph McGinty, a secondary school student from Achill Island, Ireland, received the Pfizer vaccine on Aug. 20, 2021. On Sept. 1, 2021, he was hospitalized overnight at Mayo University Hospital and discharged the following day.

On Sept. 8, 2021, McGinty revisited the hospital for review. He died at home on Sept. 13, 2021. 

Patricia McGinty formally identified her son’s remains on the day of his death but “has very little recollection of the morning in question,” the family’s attorney, Rita Kilroy, told the court.

The coroner involved in the case, Pat O’Connor, called McGinty’s death “a matter of significant public concern.”

“The circumstances of Joseph McGinty’s death is that COVID vaccination was administered to him [and] that there appears to have been either a reaction or a significant change in his medical circumstances following the administration of the vaccine and that subsequently, unfortunately, Master McGinty died,” O’Connor said in Monday’s hearing.

Kilroy told the court this week, “We would perceive there to be a concern for public health and safety and potential for recurrence in two circumstances.”

An inquest is a formal investigation conducted by a coroner in order to determine how someone died. The purpose of an inquest is limited to establishing the identity of the deceased individual as well as where, when and how they died.

At the request of Kilroy, O’Connor agreed to make a request for legal aid and legal advice for the McGinty family under Section 60 of the Coroners Act, 1962.

The inquest into McGinty’s death will resume on Dec. 20.

Studies link COVID-19 vaccines, including Pfizer’s, to negative health outcomes — especially among young men — including death

In June 2021, The Defender reported on the death of 13-year-old Jacob Clynick just three days after he received the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declined to investigate Clynick’s death, even though the death was reported to the agency’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 11, 2022, there have been nine deaths reported to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines among children ages 6 months to 5 years, 31 deaths reported among children 5 to 12 years old and 133 deaths among teens 12 to 18 years old.

Last month, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, M.D., Ph.D., recommended against mRNA COVID-19 vaccination of males ages 18 to 39 years given the results of a study that found an 84% increase in the risk of cardiac death among young adult males within 28 days of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. 

Since March, Florida has recommended against mRNA COVID-19 vaccination of healthy children and adolescents younger than 18.

On Sept. 30, Sweden announced it would no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccination for children ages 12 to 17 and in Denmark, COVID-19 vaccines are not recommended for anyone under 50 years old. (Teen’s Death 3 Weeks After Pfizer Vaccine Triggers Investigation.)

In April 2021, Jake Holliday, a single father of two from Indiana, was set to begin a new job as a home caretaker, having left his previous position of 10 years as a veterinary assistant.

That same month Holliday also received his first — and only — dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Holliday, now 37, recounted the serious adverse reactions that followed his vaccination and the difficulties he has since faced. He provided The Defender with documentation corroborating his account.

‘There were two blood clots inside my heart’

Holliday’s first symptoms appeared seven days after vaccination. He told The Defender:

“I started to feel slight chest pains, fatigue, shortness of breath and a rise of [my] heart rate that progressively got worse each day until the tenth day, when I had the worst chest pain of my life and had to call 911.”

What began as “slight chest pains” was actually far more serious.

“I learned I was having a ‘widowmaker’ type of heart attack due to two large blood clots inside my heart that required a heart catheter and two stents.

“I also learned I had myocarditis and struggled with ventricular fibrillation [VFib].”

The damage Holliday sustained to his health continues to adversely affect his life today. He explained:

“Because of the damage done to my heart I’m now in congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction of 10-25%, and I ended up having to get a subcutaneous ICD [implantable cardioverter-defibrillator] implant in the beginning of June 2022.

“I’m no longer able to work and have a hard time with anything that requires energy or exertion. Even something as minor as taking a shower can be difficult, which is why I have a shower chair now.”

Holliday continues to feel “real weak and fatigued” despite the many prescription drugs he’s taking.

“I’m now on EliquisBrilintaisosorbide mononitrate, aspirin, lisinoprilcarvedilol and atorvastatin,” he said. “I guess they are helping with prevention of another heart attack, blood clots and the VFib but I still feel real weak and fatigued all the time.”

Like other vaccine injury victims interviewed by The Defender, Holliday said some of his doctors have been “reluctant” to connect his symptoms to the COVID-19 vaccine.

“My electrophysiologist is reluctant to admit the vaccine has anything to do with it … But my cardiologist does think it has something to do with it, and we are in the process of [filing] a VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] report.”

Support from family, friends and the online community — but challenges, too

Holliday told The Defender he is fortunate to be supported by family and friends, but he has faced obstacles in some relationships.

“My family and friends have been real supportive, but it has caused major issues within my romantic life, due to erectile dysfunction from the heart damage and medications.”

He found online groups for vaccine-injured individuals, such as the Vaccine Injury/Side Effects Support Group founded by vaccine injury victim Catherine “Cat” Parker on Facebook, helpful, and s “met lots of vaccine-injured people” on Twitter.

Holliday has taken to Twitter to share his story and provide additional visibility to the stories shared by others like him. On Oct. 26, Holliday tweeted:

He explained that he is raising awareness because legal action against the vaccine manufacturers is “not an option”:

“I can’t work now and I’m having problems being approved for disability because approving me would mean they have to admit a reason for my disability.

“Filing a lawsuit for compensation is also not an option due to the immunity these vaccine companies have.”

Platforms such as Twitter are a means for him to get some measure of justice, Holliday said.

“I would like to tell my story as much as possible and participate in as many studies as I can because this isn’t right,” he said. “I want to do anything and everything I can to get my story out there in order to bring awareness to this issue.” (Even Taking a Shower Can Be Difficult’ Says Man Injured by Pfizer Vaccine.)

A 56-year-old roofing contractor and friend of the family had his first-ever seizure while working on the rooftop of a hotel building.

His coworker used all his might in a harrowing rescue maneuver to keep the helpless seizing man from falling further over the edge to his death many stories below.

As a result of this neurological event, the contractor had a prolonged severe concussion, broken ribs and underwent countless x-rays and scans during a hospitalization and follow-up clinic visits.

He went on temporary disability and his small business was shut down. Months later he had difficulty controlling high blood pressure and felt weak and dizzy.

After an exhaustive diagnostic evaluation, there was no explanation for the seizure.

He reached out to ask, “could this have been caused by my COVID-19 vaccine?”

Earlier this year, in a case study published in the National Library of Medicine, researchers from Taiwan reported a 22-year-old man who had his first seizure six days after the second Moderna shot.

Comprehensive testing including repeated spinal taps demonstrated indirect evidence of the spike protein produced by the mRNA vaccine within the brain.

They found IgG directed against the receptor binding domain of the spike protein in cerebral spinal fluid and over time, the concentrations of this antibody were discordant with serum levels, suggesting the spike protein was indeed within the brain where it would be expected to cause inflammation and trigger a seizure.

Dr. Shitiz Sriwastava and colleagues, from the Department of Neurology, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, in a review article, felt seizures were well within the realm of neurologic side effects from the COVID-19 vaccines.

Christian Kaculini et al, from the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, wrote in a 2021 historical review:

“Epilepsy is an ancient disease, which has fascinated and frightened scientists and laymen alike. Before the working knowledge of the central nervous system, seizures were shrouded in mystery. In antiquity, this disease was accredited to gods and demonic possession, causing those with epilepsy to be feared and isolated.

“Epilepsy patients continued to face discrimination through the mid-20th century. This discrimination ranged from lack of access to health insurance, jobs and marriage equality to forced sterilizations. Despite the strides that have been made, there are still many misconceptions globally regarding epilepsy.

“Studies show that patients with epilepsy in communities that understand the pathology and cause of seizures are generally more successful in social and educational environments.”

So, if someone in your circles has been diagnosed with epilepsy or new-onset seizures in the past few years with no obvious source (head trauma, neurosurgery, radiation, meningitis, etc.) ask if they took one of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccination can be quickly ruled out if the answer is “no.”

However, if COVID-19 vaccination is in the medical record, consider this possible etiology for seizures and take appropriate action.

Emergency room physicians and neurologists should be alerted to COVID-19 vaccine-induced seizures at initial presentation.

While the prognosis is unknown given the novelty of these genetic products, provided no more injections are taken, I would expect that seizures would be progressively less frequent, better controlled and potentially resolve with enough time.

Let this be a lesson learned, genetic material loaded on lipid nanoparticles is a terrible concept for a vaccine since it will go everywhere in the body including the brain where there can be inflammatory injury, disability and sadly in some victims — death. (COVID Vaccines and First-Time Seizures: Is There a Link?.)

The public is becoming increasingly disturbed with reports of death among the vaccinated.   It is natural to ask “was the death caused by vaccination?”  The most definitive way of answering that question is with autopsy.   Schwab et al reported on deaths after vaccination with detailed autopsies in Heidelberg, Germany.[i]   Of 35 fatalities within 20 days of injection, 10 were ruled out as clearly not due to the vaccine (eg drug overdose).  The remaining 25 (71%) had final diagnoses consistent with a vaccine injury syndrome including myocardial infarction, worsening heart failure, vascular aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, fatal stroke, and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia.  Interestingly, 5 cases had acute myocarditis as the cause of death with the histopathology in the heart muscle showing patchy inflammation very similar to what was seen in the deltoid muscle were the mRNA vaccine was injected. 

o the report has told us:  1) 71% of deaths that occur within 20 days of taking vaccine appear to be due to conditions well known to occur with COVID-19 vaccination, 2) inflammation in the heart was coincident with the same pattern of inflammation in the arm.   Thus we can conclude death within a few days of vaccination is most likely due to the genetic product and that inflammation in the arm may be a surrogate for a similar process in the heart.  The very high yield of post-vaccination autopsy should spur families and physicians to push for post-mortem exams so we can learn more on how this medical procedure is leading to such a large loss of human life. (Dr. Peter A. McCullough, “Courageous Discourse” email newsletter, December 4, 2022.)

This is all much more than merely “circumstantial” or anecdotal evidence as there comes a point when one has to admit that the “smoke” is caused by actual fires.

The public, though, has been conditioned not even to suspect that the gene therapy jabs have any connection with these deaths although there is much empirical evidence being amassed to prove it to those who have a modicum of intellectual curiosity and honesty to accept:

While we will be discussing the most unwelcome news of increased death rates, I am happy to report that a leading British Member of Parliament, Andrew Bridgen brought up, in the UK parliament no less, the relationship between vaccination and excess deaths.

(After this speech, Andrew was suspended from Parliament for 7 days for a supposedly “unrelated offense.”)

Where did Andrew Bridgen get his (correct) idea? I am not sure, but I posted an original analysis statistically tying “excess mortality” to vaccination rate by country on August 30, 2022.

Obviously not claiming that he somehow got it through me — I hope that many other people performed similar analyses, and one of them was noticed by Mr. Bridgen. The more people analyze this data, the better. I am happy.

New Data Looks Even Worse.

I decided to re-do the calculation of excess mortality vs. vaccine, or booster uptake, using two more months’ worth of mortality data.

I use the same exact methodology as in my “proven relationship” article. Please read it if you are interested in details or want to replicate the results. Instead of weeks 10 to 35, I now analyze “excess mortality” in weeks 20 to 44 (to be precise, the max week available up to week 44 in the short-term mortality database – the data has a lag). Everything else stayed the same.

A few notes on the data above:

  • The least vaccinated country Bulgaria has NEGATIVE excess mortality (lowest of all).
  • Chile really had more boosters given out than it has people due to multiple boosters per person, and is experiencing the HIGHEST excess mortality.
  • Sweden, sadly, moved into positive excess mortality territory, although I am glad to say that it is still low.

The questions I want to explore is: Is there an association between vaccine or booster uptake and excess mortality in Weeks 20-44? Did the association get weaker or stronger compared to weeks 10-35?

We can see that both vaccination rates (number of fully vaccinated people per 100), as well as booster doses administered per 100 persons, are VERY STRONGLY ASSOCIATED WITH EXCESS MORTALITY. Both have very low P-values, which suggests that this association is highly unlikely to have happened by random chance.

Here’s the worst part: During weeks 10-35, the vaccination rate explained only 27% of the variation in excess mortality, and the booster rate explained only 40% of excess mortality. (the so-called R-Squared). (see the previous article on this topic for regressions)

During weeks 20-44, both vaccination and booster rates explain NEARLY HALF or excess mortality variation (49% for both). That’s a lot greater explanatory power!

This means that over time, the strength of the association between excess mortality and vaccination is INCREASING! (Association Between Vaccines and Excess Mortality Getting Stronger – And Is Discussed in UK Parliament.)

All this having been noted, there was a National Broadcasting Company (NBC) news report that did at least discuss the connection between Big Pharma’s “vaccines” to “prevent” a disease that is not a life-endangering threat in most cases to those without underlying conditions and if treated properly by the use of protocols relying upon massive doses of Vitamins C, D, and Zinc in addition to certain pharmaceutical products and myocarditis. This applies to the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines as well as the mRNA jabs equally:

(LifeSiteNews) — In a sign of a potential shift in the mainstream media’s coverage of the issue, NBC News has published a report acknowledging a possible link between COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis.

NBC’s November 12 report opens with an anecdote about Detroit resident Da’Vion Miller, who at age 22 passed out at his home and was later hospitalized and diagnosed with myocarditis and pericarditis one week after receiving his first dose of Pfizer’s mRNA-based COVID shot and was subsequently advised by doctors not to receive his second.

“Myocarditis is a condition that has long been linked to a number of viral infections, including influenza, coxsackieviruses, as well as Covid,” the report says. “It has also been observed as an infrequent but worrisome side effect of the mRNA Covid vaccines.”

It then goes on to say “there have been around 1,000 reports of vaccine-related myocarditis or pericarditis in children under age 18, primarily young males, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” The U.S. government’s federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) gives a much higher number for overall myocarditis and pericarditis cases, 53,836 as of November 4. An April study out of Israel indicates that COVID infection alone cannot account for such cases, despite claims to the contrary.

Reports submitted to VAERS about possible cases are not yet confirmed, as anyone can submit a report, but CDC researchers have acknowledged “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.

The report also reveals that Moderna and Pfizer, the creators of the two mRNA-based jabs, are conducting “the first research in the U.S.” into potential heart problems associated with their products. Two Moderna trials are currently underway; a Pfizer trial is set to begin in coming months.

Early findings required by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration could be published starting early next year, but in the meantime the FDA continues to claim “there is no evidence of increased risk of deaths following mRNA vaccines compared to individuals who did not get vaccinated,” and that “evidence from well-conducted, peer-reviewed, published studies suggests that the risk of death is higher for unvaccinated individuals for nearly every age group.”

Still, the report represents a significant departure from the mainstream media’s treatment of the issue over the past two years, during which any affirmation of the shots’ harms was treated as dangerous medical misinformation.

Despite such discouragement of discussing the subject, many harbor moral and practical reservations about the COVID-19 vaccines, given the use of aborted fetal cells in their development, the superiority of natural immunity, COVID’s low risk to most otherwise-healthy individuals, the vaccines’ failure to prevent infection, their accelerated development under former President Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed initiative giving them only a fraction of the evaluation and development time vaccines normally take, the lack of transparency from their manufacturers, and mounting evidence of serious adverse effects.

VAERS is not the only data source indicating cause for concern. Data from the Pentagon’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) has been similarly alarming, showing that 2021 saw drastic spikes in a variety of diagnoses for serious medical issues over the previous five-year average, including hypertension (2,181%), neurological disorders (1,048%), multiple sclerosis (680%), Guillain-Barre syndrome (551%), breast cancer, (487%), female infertility (472%), pulmonary embolism (468%), migraines (452%), ovarian dysfunction (437%), testicular cancer (369%), and tachycardia (302%)

In September, the Japanese Society for Vaccinology published a peer-reviewed study conducted by researchers from Stanford, UCLA, and the University of Maryland, which found that the “Pfizer trial exhibited a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group” while the “Moderna trial exhibited a 6% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group,” for a combined “16% higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients.” (NBC acknowledges myocarditis link to COVID-19 vaccines after sudden deaths of young adults.)

Dr. Peter McCullough and author John Leake published an article on November 20, 2022, about the myocarditis link with the infamous jabs, focusing on how a professional football coach, a man named Bruce Arians, had boasted of his team being one hundred percent vaccinated before he developed myocarditis after having gotten the jab without admitting any connection between the two:

It is ironic that some of the most vigorous promoters and strongest voices for COVID-19 vaccination in public view have also felt the bite of viscous side effects such as heart inflammation.  Former NFL coach Bruce Arians has been known for his slogan “No risk-it, no biscuit,” which encourages aggressive play calling.  When he was asserting in the press that all of the Tampa Bay Bucs and staff were fully vaccinated in 2021, little did he know he was going to risk is cardiac biscuit with probable COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis a year later. 

Arians, age 70, is a prostate cancer survivor and was hospitalized twice for chest pain in 2017 while coaching the Arizona Cardinals.  So he knew he was taking risks with COVID-19 vaccination tagged with FDA warnings for heart damage that can lead to heart failure and sudden death.  What he may not have known is that myocarditis can strike in his age group as shown by Rose and McCullough and when it occurs in his age group, it may compound a common problem of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease.  

Fortunately, Arians is out of the hospital now and recovering but yet faces an uncertain prognosis which can only worsen with more shots.  Coach Arians should rethink how he conceptualizes risks for his players and staff.   Arians’ coaching philosophy has been summed up with one phrase: “No risk it, no biscuit. You can’t live scared.” His former quarterback in Arizona, Carson Palmer, says, “You play for him, you see he just has guts. He will let it rip, let it fly no matter what.”[i]  Time for players, coaches, staff and owners to take the responsible track and inform the public of their mounting cases of COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis, express regret, and warn others of this serious and completely avoidable problem.  No need to take risks here coach, keep them for the field. (From Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake’s “Courageous Discourse” email newsletter, November 20, 2022.)

A cardiologist in the United Kingdom has come to the same conclusions independently of the work being done in the United States of America by Dr. McCullough:Until the British cardiologist, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, expressed grave concern about the safety of Covid mRNA vaccines, he was one of the most celebrated doctors in Britain. In 2016 he was named in the Sunday Times Debrett’s list as one of the most influential people in science and medicine in the UK in a list that included Professor Stephen Hawking. His total Altmetric score (measure of impact and reach) of his medical journal publications since 2013 is over 10,000 making it one of the highest in the World for a clinical doctor during this period.Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.In the early days of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Britain, he advocated the injections for the general public. However, in July of 2021, he experienced a terrible personal loss that caused him to reevaluate the shots—namely, the sudden and unexpected death of his 73-year-old father. His father’s death made no sense to him because he knew from his own examination that his father’s general and cardiac health were excellent. As he put it in a recent interview:His postmortem findings really shocked me. There were two severe blockages in his coronary arteries, which didn’t really make any sense with everything I know, both as a cardiologist—someone who has expertise in this particular area—but also intimately knowing my dad’s lifestyle and his health. Not long after that, data started to emerge that suggested a possible link between the mRNA vaccine and increased risk of heart attacks from a mechanism of increasing inflammation around the coronary arteries. But on top of that, I was contacted by a whistleblower at a very prestigious university in the UK, a cardiologist himself, who explained to me that there was a similar research finding in his department, and that those researchers had decided to essentially cover that up because they were worried about losing funding from the pharmaceutical industry. But it doesn’t stop there. I then started looking at data in the UK to see if there had been any increase in cardiac arrest. My dad suffered a cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death at home. Had there been any change in the UK since the vaccine rollout? And again those findings were very clear. There’s been an extra 14,000 out of hospital cardiac arrests in 2021 vs 2020.The more Dr. Malhotra looked into it, the more he felt the same concern about the safety of the mRNA vaccines that Dr. Peter McCullough had felt since the spring of 2021. The alarming incidence of sudden, unexpected deaths during the latter half of 2021 and the first eight months of 2022—especially among the young and fit—strengthened his grave concern and suspicion.In September of 2022,—after a thorough investigation of the growing volume of data—he came to his conclusion:The Covid mRNA vaccine has likely played a significant role or been a primary cause of unexpected cardiac arrests, heart attacks, strokes, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart failure since 2021 until proven otherwise.
Until the British cardiologist, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, expressed grave concern about the safety of Covid mRNA vaccines, he was one of the most celebrated doctors in Britain. In 2016 he was named in the Sunday Times Debrett’s list as one of the most influential people in science and medicine in the UK in a list that included Professor Stephen Hawking. His total Altmetric score (measure of impact and reach) of his medical journal publications since 2013 is over 10,000 making it one of the highest in the World for a clinical doctor during this period.In the early days of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Britain, he advocated the injections for the general public. However, in July of 2021, he experienced a terrible personal loss that caused him to reevaluate the shots—namely, the sudden and unexpected death of his 73-year-old father. His father’s death made no sense to him because he knew from his own examination that his father’s general and cardiac health were excellent. As he put it in a recent interview:His postmortem findings really shocked me. There were two severe blockages in his coronary arteries, which didn’t really make any sense with everything I know, both as a cardiologist—someone who has expertise in this particular area—but also intimately knowing my dad’s lifestyle and his health. Not long after that, data started to emerge that suggested a possible link between the mRNA vaccine and increased risk of heart attacks from a mechanism of increasing inflammation around the coronary arteries. But on top of that, I was contacted by a whistleblower at a very prestigious university in the UK, a cardiologist himself, who explained to me that there was a similar research finding in his department, and that those researchers had decided to essentially cover that up because they were worried about losing funding from the pharmaceutical industry. But it doesn’t stop there. I then started looking at data in the UK to see if there had been any increase in cardiac arrest. My dad suffered a cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death at home. Had there been any change in the UK since the vaccine rollout? And again those findings were very clear. There’s been an extra 14,000 out of hospital cardiac arrests in 2021 vs 2020.The more Dr. Malhotra looked into it, the more he felt the same concern about the safety of the mRNA vaccines that Dr. Peter McCullough had felt since the spring of 2021. The alarming incidence of sudden, unexpected deaths during the latter half of 2021 and the first eight months of 2022—especially among the young and fit—strengthened his grave concern and suspicion.In September of 2022,—after a thorough investigation of the growing volume of data—he came to his conclusion:The Covid mRNA vaccine has likely played a significant role or been a primary cause of unexpected cardiac arrests, heart attacks, strokes, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart failure since 2021 until proven otherwise.His conclusion, including his precise verbal formulation of it, was identical to the conclusion drawn by Dr. Peter McCullough. Though the two doctors ultimately established contact to compare notes, they reached their conclusions based on their own, independent inquiries, before they spoke with each other.Recently the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation produced Until Proven Otherwise— a short video documentary about the corroborating findings of these two leading cardiologists. I believe it is no exaggeration to say that the gripping, four-minute video is a MUST SEE for everyone. Please share it with your family and friends. (John Leake, “Courageous Discourse” email newsletter, November 16, 2022.)

Dr. Malhotra was honest enough to admit he made a mistake in promoting the vaccines and then was courageous enough to publicize his findings about what happened with his own father. Such honesty is very rare in the medical or scientific communities today.

Dr. McCullough has noted the spike protein’s capacity to taint pure blood and thus to become the cause of vaccine shedding that has been the reason that some of the unvaccinated, including this author, to become sickened by the virus:

One of the most common questions I am asked from the unvaccinated stems from concerns over “shedding.”  Because the mRNA vaccines have been in development by the US Department of Defense DARPA since 2011, one would have expected that all of the necessary preclinical testing would have been completed before Operation Warp Speed was announced.  The 2015 FDA guidance on Gene Product Shedding Studies with gene therapies, which are defined as “all products that exert their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integration into the host genome and that are administered in the form of nucleic acids, viruses or genetically modified microorganisms”.[i]   By this statement mRNA vaccines are indeed gene therapy products and should have been submitted to these excretion studies by DARPA funded researchers long ago.[ii]  Sadly, these careful development steps were skipped from the beginning in our military-style vaccine development program, and now the public is grappling with the issue of nucleic acid and Spike protein as a potential concern among those who have worked so hard to remain healthy and free of COVID-19 vaccination.  In the most comprehensive paper on shedding thus far, former Inserm researcher Dr. Helene Banoun has published the basis for which there is great likelihood that mRNA either on lipid nanoparticles or within exosomes is circulatory in blood and is secreted in every body secretion that would naturally expect to contain particles of this size.[iii]  (Dr. Peter McCullough, “Courageous Discourse” email newsletter, November 22, 2022.)

Additionally, Dr. McCullough has discussed how a sportscaster who wanted the “freedom” of movement that comes with the poisoned jabs is now suffering from blood clots that are limiting such freedom:

With each COVID-19 infection there is exposure to the Spike protein on the surface of the virus.  This protein causes a world of trouble including damaging blood vessels and causing blood clots.   When the virus infects the nose, with nasal washes and gargles and other treatments in the McCullough Protocol©, the degree of viral invasion in the body should be negligible.   When a COVID-19 vaccine is given, however, the genetic code for the Spike protein is installed throughout the body and then it is produced for at least a month or longer, giving a heavy and prolonged exposure to this deadly protein.   The highest risk patients for complications after vaccination are those who already had untreated COVID-19 illness and then went on to take unnecessary COVID-19 vaccines.  The US FDA and the vaccine companies excluded COVID-19 recovered patients from clinical trials because they knew there could be no theoretical benefit and that they would cause harm.   When the FDA and CDC advised Americans that naturally immune patients should undergo vaccination violating the exclusions of the clinical trials—we knew the program was off the rails.   Multiple studies have shown complication rates are markedly increased for the naturally immune who vaccinate.[i]   Take my favorite college football commentator Herb Kirkstreit who contracted COVID-19 in December of 2020 and later commented: “Been 5 months since I tested positive for Covid. Still can’t taste or smell.”[ii]  Then in the Spring of 2021 he takes a COVID-19 vaccine stating, “I just wanted to get vaccinated and feel the freedom.”   Presumably he takes a booster six months later in the fall of 2021.  Then early in 2022 Kirkstreit announces he cannot attend the NFL draft because he has a blood clots that have shot to the lungs.[iii]  More cancellations occur because of this persistent problem.  He wasn’t exactly “feeling the freedom” at that point.  

rkstreit has been loaded with the Spike protein at least three times and may still be taking on more thrombogenic protein every six months if boosting.  I would not be surprised if in addition, he has an inherited genetic trait that predisposes to blood clots.   I am concerned that in my practice large blood clots like the one he has are not going away quickly with conventional blood thinners.  Additionally, undertakers are reporting tubular rubbery blood clots in the form of a casts of the major blood vessels obstructing the flow of injected embalming fluid.  Thus, the quality and the size of the clot are worrisome. Reports indicate the Spike protein is within the clots and is amyloidogenic, meaning the Spike protein folds and encourages complexes of clotting material to organize into a solid form that is resistant to the natural thrombolytic system of the body.[iv]   We hope for Kirkstreit that his clot is not permanent.  His doctors should recognize the connection and fully exempt him from more ill-advised vaccinations. (Dr. Peter McCullough, “Courageous Discourse” email newsletter, November 1, 2022.)

Other researchers have reached the same conclusions:

There are over 1000 peer-reviewed papers in the preprint server system and or in the National Library of Medicine (PUBMED) describing side effects after mRNA or adenoviral DNA COVID-19 vaccination.  One of the most dreaded complications is vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).   Because the Spike protein produced in response to the vaccine genetic code causes hemagglutination and micro blood clotting, there is excessive antigenic presentation of platelets to the spleen and reticuloendothelial system.  As a result, the body produces auto-antibodies directed against a platelet receptor (PF4) which has homology with an endothelial protein.  This causes autoantibody “pinning” of platelets to the lining of blood vessel cells resulting in consumption of platelets, blood clotting and bleeding at the same time.  Unfortunate victims are fine for a few weeks after vaccination.  Then bleeding from the oral and nasal mucosa associated with bruising under the skin occurs commonly with serious blood clotting within the brain and elsewhere in the body.  Most patients are hospitalized in critical condition as doctors try a variety of medical and interventional maneuvers to combat simultaneous clotting and bleeding.  As you can imagine, in some individuals the process is overwhelming and no matter how much critical care support is given, the patient dies.[i]   The obituary of Mrs. Jessica Berg, age 37, a previously healthy vibrant mother is given in the figure.[ii]   It indicates she died as a result of VITT. 

To her left is a paper by Tsilingiris et al, titled “Vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia:  The shady side of a success story.[iii]”   The authors never state what “success” meant in the title but it is clear that schools, employers, and the military are “shady” when they don’t fairly warn people what can happen when forcing mass vaccination.  Television commercials, internet promotions, and consent forms do not describe VITT.   Ms. Berg and her family had no way of getting an informed consent.  To her right is a treatment pathway described that doctors commonly take to treat patients in the hospital.  As in her case, many patients (~39%) succumb to this premature and bloody death which leaves more questions than answers.   How could this have been anticipated?   Is VITT associated with prior heparin induced thrombocytopenia (a similar syndrome)?  What is the best initial blood thinner?  Why aren’t patients with prior blood disorders given prompt exemption from such a horrific threat?  Ask your doctor next time about VITT and how would they advise to avoid it.   If you get a blank look or a queasy uncomfortable expression, show a copy of Ms. Berg’s obituary and start a critical conversation.  (COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia.)

Indeed, the facts are available to those who want to access them as each week the Children’s Health Defense organization publishes the latest figures released by United States Centers for Disease Control’s Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS). Here are the latest available figures:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,458,322 reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 4, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 31,961 reports of deaths and 265,274 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period.

There were a total of 7,783 reports of adverse events following the new COVID-19 bivalent booster as of Nov. 4, 2022, with 45% attributed to Moderna’s booster and 55% attributed to Pfizer/BioNTech’s booster. The data included a total of 61 deaths and 434 serious injuries.

As of Nov. 10, 31.4 million people have received the updated bivalent booster dose.

Of the 31,961 reported deaths, 20,381 cases are attributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, 8,696 cases to Moderna, 2,773 cases to Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and no cases yet reported for Novavax.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 894,850 adverse events, including 15,096 deaths and 93,362 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 4, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 15,096 deaths reported as of Nov. 4, 7% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination and 15% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination.

In the U.S., 640 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 2, including 381 million doses of Pfizer, 241 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of J&J.

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 4, 2022, for 6-month-olds to 5-year-olds show:

The latest death reported in this age group was that of a 10-year-old boy who died suddenly six days after receiving a third dose of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. According to the report, “It is unknown if an autopsy was performed.”

According to the company (Moderna) comment included in the report, “Cause of death was reported as cardiorespiratory arrest. Information regarding clinical evaluation, diagnostic tests, treatment provided, or autopsy reports has not been disclosed.”

VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 4, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

  • 40,268 adverse events, including 4,395 rated as serious and 131 reported deaths.
  • According to the CDC, “VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public.”
  • 269 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
  • 1,336 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 1,167 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 303 reports of blood clotting disorders with 279 cases attributed to Pfizer.
  • 27 cases of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) with all cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 4, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

Pfizer, Moderna developing combined mRNA Omicron-flu vaccine

Pfizer and Moderna are developing a combination COVID-19 and flu injection utilizing mRNA coding for the BA4/BA5 Omicron subvariant and new mRNA coding for antigens contained in the influenza virus.

Because the COVID-19 component, which is under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), has failed in animal studies and no human trials have been reported, that component should be off the table from the start, according to Dr. Peter A. McCullough.

Combining the genetic code for both the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and conserved proteins of influenza A and B would mean installation of the long-lasting genetic code for multiple foreign proteins in the human body.

Production of these proteins will induce an ongoing multi-pronged immune response that could create amplified side effects. mRNA coding for influenza would be a new biological product not under EUA and should have to go through the full five-year regulatory development cycle for genetic biologicals.

However, it looks like vaccine companies are trying the shortcut this development cycle by combining the non-emergency flu shot with the EUA COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer press release on new bivalent booster raises questions

On Nov. 4, Pfizer announced what some media outlets called “good news” about its COVID-19 bivalent booster, for which the FDA in August granted EUA on the basis of testing conducted on eight mice.

In a press release, Pfizer summarized the updated data from its phase 2/3 clinical trial on the Pfizer-BioNTech Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent COVID-19 vaccine.

In simplest terms, the bivalent booster increased antibodies to the Omicron sublineages by a factor of 13.2, whereas the original booster increased them by a factor of only 2.9. The increase was seen only in people over age 55.

Although the new booster produced a more modest increase (9.5 fold) in antibodies in the younger age group (18-55), Pfizer chose not to report what the response was in the age-matched group who received the original booster.

Pfizer provided no comparative results in the 18-55 group and no clinical outcome differences in terms of COVID-19 infections — either in the Nov. 4 press release or in a previous Pfizer press release summarizing preliminary data.

At what point does an “increase in the neutralizing antibody response” confer “stronger protection?”

Neither BioNTech, who co-produced the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, nor the FDA knows — despite insisting the agency has enough grounds to cajole/compel/coerce those who acquired SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from a previous bout with COVID-19 to get jabbed anyway.

Rutgers announces COVID vaccine trial with Pfizer, as CHD lawsuit against Rutgers advances

CHD on Nov. 7, filed a summary of its appeal in a lawsuit against Rutgers University over the university’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

The attorney representing CHD and 13 Rutgers University students in the lawsuit said the District Court of New Jersey didn’t follow the legal standard when it dismissed CHD’s case.

In an interview this week with The Defender, Julio C. Gomez of Gomez LLC, lead counsel in the case, said U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi’s argument for granting the university’s motion to dismiss “failed to accept the facts as alleged in the plaintiffs’ complaint as true,” as required under the legal standard on a motion to dismiss.

CHD on Oct. 19 appealed the decision and on Nov. 7 filed a summary of its appeal.

Gomez also spoke with The Defender about Rutgers’ Nov. 4 announcement that it is partnering with Pfizer on a new clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine in children under age 5.

The new clinical trial is the latest evidence of Rutgers’ conflicts of interest related to its COVID-19 vaccine policies, Gomez said. (10-Year-Old Boy Died of Cardiac Arrest 7 Days After Moderna Shot, VAERS Data Show.)

These are only the reported statistics, which is highly inaccurate given the fact that most medical personnel and especially hospital and medical practice administrators who simply ignore any causal link between the vaccines and the illnesses, including many that cause chronic conditions from which they may never recover and thus will be lifelong in nature, and deaths that have been occurring with regularity. The situation is so bad that there is only laboratory in the nation where a trained pathologist/epidemiologist examines tissue samples from people who are suspected to have died from the coronavirus to make a definitive determination declaring the vaccine to be the cause of death.

There are a few places, however, where pathologists are being honest enough to admit a causal link between the SARS Cov2 “vaccines” and the deaths occur therefrom. One of them, remarkably enough, is in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, notorious for being the only state that United States Senator George S. McGovern (D-South Dakota) won against President Richard Milhous Nixon in 1972, and, of course, for being the state where voters kept sending Edward Moore Kennedy and John Frederick Kerry back to the United States Senate time and time and time again:

In this article, I highlight the work of independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr., who analyzed nearly seven years of Massachusetts death certificates he obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

Beaudoin’s findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 death toll in Massachusetts was largely confined to a short window of time in 2020, and that COVID-19 deaths in 2020 resulted from pulmonary causes — in contrast to COVID-19 deaths in 2021, which were more closely linked to illnesses of the heart and blood.

There is no reasonable way to explain how SARS-CoV-2 dramatically changed the way it attacks and kills human beings and why it did so at precisely the time the experimental mRNA inoculations were deployed.

Beaudoin’s analysis also suggests that medical fraud and negligence may have been in play on a scale yet to be definitively determined.

Massachusetts: a center of COVID controversy

Beaudoin is a fellow resident of Massachusetts. Just down the road from us sit some of the most renowned hospitals and centers for medical research. None seem interested in validating or refuting the devastating implications of Beaudoin’s findings.

Boston was home to the infamous Biogen conference held in March 2020. The event was considered to be one of the first “super spreader events” in the country.

In the summer of 2021, an outbreak of COVID-19 in Massachusetts’ Barnstable County forced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to acknowledge that the injectable mRNA therapies were worthless.

When all was said and done, the vaccinated comprised a larger percentage of those who contracted COVID-19 than you would expect from a random sample of the county’s residents.

Of those who were hospitalized in this outbreak, 80% were fully vaccinated. The “vaccines” offered no protection against severe disease.

In other words, there was no evidence that the vaccine offered any protection against infection.

Furthermore, vaccination status had no bearing on the viral load of those who got sick. Because viral load is correlated with infectiousness, the vaccine did not offer any reduction in transmissibility.

In one of its first real-world tests, the rapidly developed, tested and deployed therapy failed completely on all counts.

Massachusetts researchers can’t seem to move on from mask mandates

Earlier this month, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) found there was an increase in COVID-19 cases in Massachusetts school districts that lifted their mask mandates.

The authors of the study were researchers from the Boston Public Health Commission and venerated, local academic institutions in Boston (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, the Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School).

According to the authors, school districts with mask mandates had 39.9 fewer cases per 1,000 students over a 15-week period.

I wish to pose a simple question to the dutiful scientists down the road: so what?

Although districts that continued to enforce mask mandates after the statewide mandate was dropped had a lower COVID-19 incidence rate, mask mandates did not eliminate the transmission of the disease. Those districts still had 60 cases per 1,000 students.

The NEJM authors also proved that COVID-19 is transmissible whether or not masking precautions are implemented.

Children are going to get COVID-19 whether they are forced to wear a mask or not. There is no longer a need to “flatten the curve” until a miracle “vaccine” can be developed at “warp speed.”

COVID-19 is a disease that will be with us for the foreseeable future. What is the point of such a study? To convince Massachusetts residents that a modest decrease in school days missed is worth the imposition of perpetual mask mandates upon their children?

The ‘Big Story’ in Massachusetts

While the NEJM researchers were busy tabulating COVID-19 infection rates in different school districts during the first part of 2022, a far more important story was unfolding in Massachusetts.

Through a FOIA request made to the state’s department of public records, Beaudoin, an electrical engineer, obtained access to every death certificate in the state of Massachusetts between 2015 and September 2022.

His investigation into these records paints a disquieting picture of how the COVID-19 “vaccine” likely devastated the health of Massachusetts residents.

Beaudoin’s analysis is detailed and rigorous and stands as an example of why a medical degree or an academic appointment is not required to uncover explosive evidence.

In fact, those kinds of credentials can often be impediments rather than assets. There is no excuse why the Massachusetts Department of Public Health has not done the analysis Beaudoin chose to do himself.

For the purposes of this article, I will focus on the summary points. A deeper dive can be found on Mathew Crawford’s “Rounding The Earth” podcast or in Beaudoin’s own Substack, which he writes under the name “Coquin de Chien.”

The takeaway is impossible to miss. The rise and fall of daily deaths over a 10-week period in the early-to-late spring of 2020 is representative of a non-immune population encountering an infectious and virulent pathogen for the first time. This bump in the black line was from the casualties of the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Massachusetts.

Whether or not the state was still in the throes of a pandemic emergency beyond the first few weeks of June 2020 is debatable because it is quite clear that daily deaths quickly returned to baseline and stayed there until the autumn — when a far less lethal second wave hit the state. Recall that Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) stipulates that a public emergency is required before any mitigating therapy can obtain EUA.

The majority of the casualties were confined to the elderly (65 and older) over a 10-week period. This is represented by the deep red cells in ages over 65 starting April 1.

Contrary to the endless deluge of news reports that suggested otherwise, official death certificates indicate the pandemic in Massachusetts was short-lived and affected only the most vulnerable.

The distribution of deaths in 2021 is remarkably different than in 2020:

  • The short-lived and profound increase in deaths in the elderly in the spring of 2020 is not present in 2021. As mentioned above, the pandemic emergency was arguably over by the summer of 2020.
  • There is a substantial and sustained (present throughout the year) increase in deaths in people ages 60 to 80 that is not present in 2020. What is causing or contributing to the excess deaths in this younger age group in 2021 that was not present in 2020?
  • There is a substantial decrease in deaths in the eldest age group (85+).

The paradoxical drop in deaths in the most elderly (85+) is best explained by the substantial jump in deaths from the previous year in that age group. SARS-CoV-2 took the lives of the most elderly leaving a hardier group of octogenarians.

The increase in deaths throughout 2021 implicates the COVID-19 “vaccines” as a contributing factor (among others) for two reasons.

First, the pattern of deaths is not representative of an infectious agent that takes the lives of the vulnerable while leaving behind a population that is more robust and that is attaining natural immunity through exposure, i.e., what was seen in 2020.

Second — and most obvious — is that the “vaccines” were present in 2021 and not in 2020.

What is actually killing people in 2021?

The increase in all-cause mortality in 2021 in Massachusetts is reflected in other parts of the world. This concerning trend is often explained as solely the result of pandemic restrictions that prevented people from obtaining basic healthcare, cancer screenings, chemotherapy, etc.

This is where Beaudoin’s Massachusetts findings go further. Here are some key points from his detailed analysis:

  • Average age of all-cause deaths in 2021 was 75, which is significantly lower than the average for the years 2015-2019 (75.6) and even more so than in 2020 (76.2).
  • 2021 saw an 8% jump in deaths from all causes compared to the average for the years 2015-2019, yet there was a substantial decrease in deaths attributed to COVID-19 compared to 2020. This could be explained by a vaccine that is partially effective in preventing COVID-19 deaths. However …
  • 2021 saw the biggest jump in deaths from cardiac arrest compared to the previous year. Deaths from cardiac arrest in 2020 made up 16.62% of all deaths that year. In 2021, it was 18.63% of all deaths — or a 12.1% increase from 2020, which already had the greatest percentage of the previous five years.
  • A similar jump in deaths from pulmonary emboli occurred in 2021 as well. Moreover, COVID-19 deaths that involved pulmonary emboli doubled in 2021 compared to 2020 and more than tripled in 2022.
  • The proportion of COVID-19 deaths that involved cardiac arrest increased by 47.5% in 2021 compared to 2020 and 63.3% in 2022. Recall that Pfizer’s six-month results demonstrated a four times greater risk of cardiac arrest in vaccinated participants than in those who received the placebo (Table S4).

According to information extracted from actual death certificates, COVID-19 apparently changed its way of killing people in 2021. Beaudoin accurately summarizes:

“Viruses do not simply change how they kill from one year to the next. Something happened in C19-involved deaths after 2020 that changed how C19 purportedly kills people. Pneumonia and respiratory issues dominated 2020, the year of C19, but something insidious has doubled and tripled relative numbers of circulatory system deaths after 2020. The Massachusetts DPH cannot hide from this. Either there is massive fraud in coding of deaths or some intervention in 2021 and 2022 caused deaths or both are true at the same time.”

Evidence of medical fraud?

In his dive into the 400,000 or so death certificates he obtained, Beaudoin showed there is also a high likelihood that some deaths are being inappropriately attributed to COVID-19 while others are linked to the vaccine but no mention of this appears on the certificate.

One such example involves the death of a 7-year-old girl in a town near my own. As Beaudoin has respectfully declined to mention the name of the child in his Substack, I will follow his example. Multiple news outlets covered this tragedy. All reported that she died from COVID-19.

Beaudoin was able to find her death certificate, which indeed states that she died from “Complications from COVID-19 viral infection.”

But was her death certificate accurate?

He also found a report in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, of a complication from a second dose of the Pfizer formulation that was administered to a 7-year-old girl in Massachusetts.

Personal identification information does not appear on VAERS reports. However, the report indicates that this vaccine complication occurred just three days prior to the day of the death of the child who died of COVID-19:

Note that this VAERS report indicates the child previously experienced severe nausea and vomiting for 8-10 hours immediately following her first dose. After her second dose, for which this report was filed, her fever spiked to 103, she developed a severe stomachache and had not had a bowel movement for three days.

Is this the same child who purportedly died from COVID-19? If so, attributing the death to COVID-19 with no mention of the vaccine on her death certificate would constitute medical fraud — or at the very least, negligence on the part of the medical examiner.

Conspicuously missing from news reports covering this child’s death was her vaccination status. Was this an oversight? If this young person who died from COVID-19 had not received the COVID-19 “vaccine” would this have been mentioned?

Notably, a different 7-year-old girl who died from COVID-19 made the news around the same time this year. This child was from Tennessee. People magazine covered her story, taking care to mention that she had not been inoculated.

People printed a quote from her doctor, a pediatric infectious disease expert, who told Good Morning America:

“This is not something to mess around with. The takeaway for parents is this is a virus that we have got to take very seriously and one we have a safe and effective vaccine for.”

Media coverage rarely misses an opportunity to laud the vaccines’ benefits and warn of the danger of remaining unvaccinated. Simultaneously, any information that may implicate the COVID-19 “vaccines” when harm has occurred is categorically omitted.

Of course, without proof of this child’s vaccination status, we can only speculate. This information exists on the Massachusetts Immunization Information System, which Beaudoin hopes he will eventually be able to access.

Questions for the medical establishment

How many deaths have occurred where the COVID-19 “vaccine” likely played a role but was not mentioned in official records?

How many deaths have been falsely attributed to COVID-19?

In March, health officials in Massachusetts eliminated nearly 4,000 (approximately 15%) COVID-19 deaths from their tally. Dr. Catherine Brown, a Massachusetts Department of Public Health epidemiologist said:

“After a deep dive into our data and reviewing thousands of death certificates we recognize that this updated definition gives us a truer picture of mortality associated with COVID-19.”

What prompted this “deep dive?” Was it news of Beaudoin’s FOIA request and his investigation that was being picked up around the same time?

While researchers at prestigious institutions are trying to retrospectively determine whether face coverings may have prevented absenteeism in a handful of school districts, Massachusetts health officials continue to ignore enormous vaccine safety signals and evidence of medical fraud in their own state.

Official death certificates indicate that thousands of deaths in 2021 may have been linked to the COVID-19 vaccines. If they weren’t linked to these products, why and how has the SARS-CoV-2 virus found a different way to kill people in 2021 and 2022?

Do these same signals appear in other states as well? How long will state departments of public health sit on their data before telling the public what that data show?

Updated: This sentence was updated for clarity: When all was said and done, the vaccinated comprised a larger percentage of those who contracted COVID-19 than you would expect from a random sample of the county’s residents. (Massachusetts Death Certificates Show Excess Mortality Could Be Linked to COVID Vaccines.)

Moreover, one of the principal reasons that the “vaccines,”  several of which are tainted by the use of the stem cell lines derived from butchered babies while the others are the life-altering mRNA therapy jabs that permanently change the recipients’ genetic code, thus predisposing them to a variety of diseases and conditions thereafter, have ben ineffective even on a merely biochemical level is the fact that the profiteers who manufacture and market had been fighting the virus as it existed once it had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology without bothering to factor in the gazillions of times that that old virus had mutated and adapted:

A principle of infectious diseases is “antimicrobial stewardship” which involves choosing the right antibiotic for the right patient and never over-prescribing or blanket covering patients who don’t need treatment.  Another principle is “narrowing the spectrum” of a drug once the organism is identified by culture or other methods.  These fundamental approaches to the use of antibiotics work to limit the problem of bacterial resistance and the development of “superbugs.”  Every year hospitals each produce their antibiogram or report of their common infections encountered and what antibiotics either are effective (organism is sensitive) or ineffective (organism is resistant).  In the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic these principles have been applied to the use of monoclonal antibodies and the process explains why various EUA products (e.g., bamlanivimab) were pulled from the market when they were understood to be no longer effective at neutralizing SARS-CoV-2.   This entire thought process has been thrown out the window for COVID-19 vaccines.  For 18 months the ancestral strain Wuhan Institute of Virology Spike protein was the featured antigen for Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Novavax vaccines.  Within a few months, there was mounting evidence that SARS-CoV-2 easily mutated to escape the reach of antibodies generated by the vaccines which would apply to serious invasive illness (IgG and IgM).   Because the COVID-19 vaccines have never been demonstrated to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in the nasopharynx, the only theoretical benefit would be for systemic disease.   It has now become apparent that nature has the upper hand over the vaccine manufacturers as SARS-CoV-2 has far greater alacrity.  Because replication can allow changes in genetic code that rapidly allow continued survival, SARS-CoV-2 enjoys a library of ~28k mutations of which ~4.5K are in the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein or the tip of the spear. 

Wang and colleagues using detailed modeling techniques of the mutations prevalent in the more intensely vaccinated countries has shown indeed mass vaccination is backfiring and fueling more viral resistance to the limited antibody library that could be generated by the vaccines.[i]  Wang’s analysis suggests that future vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2 is hopeless.  The virus is simply too nimble and can manipulate the “binding free energy” between the RBD and its human target the ACE2 receptor.  This means the more vaccinations are delivered the greater the number of mutant stains and the longer the virus will propagate and extend the pandemic.  Thus, a key step in ending the pandemic will be termination of mass vaccination.  The virus doesn’t stop until mankind stops. (Dr. Peter McCullough, “Courageous Discourse” newsletter, Friday, December 2, 2022.)

Although most Americans are willfully blind to the truth of the matter, a clinic in Italy has opened to treat those who have been injured by the Covid-19 jabs:

LUCCA, Italy (LifeSiteNews) — A private medical clinic has opened in Lucca, Italy that is devoted to caring for patients who have been injured by the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

The clinic was opened by a group of doctors and health workers who were recently reinstated to their positions after newly-elected Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government removed discriminatory legislation that barred vaccine-free Italians from working in healthcare.

An Italian medical rights group celebrated the clinic as “helpful” and “welcoming,” but a left-wing political party from Tuscany has attempted to pressure the mayor of Lucca to publicly disavow the clinic seeking to help heal those suffering from COVID vaccine injuries.

The local Partito Democratico (Democratic Party) released a statement saying “we believe the mayor needs to take a position, and distance himself from what is happening on this front in our city.”

The statement was made even after the party admitted that the group who started the clinic did so with the intention of helping the vaccine-injured, and that the group also wanted doctors to have freedom of conscience protections when practicing medicine.

Italy has flipped the script on COVID restrictions since the election of Meloni, who has admitted that Italy had the “most restrictive anti-COVID measures in the entire Western world,” but was still “among the countries with the highest numbers of deaths and infections.”

She vowed that her government “will not replicate that pattern in any way,” promising to never “limit fundamental freedoms.”

Under previous Prime Minister Mario Draghi, the then left-wing government had enacted severe measures against Italians who chose not to take the COVID jab, restricting them from many aspects of public life under the guise of the “Super Green Pass.”

Under the restrictions, all Italians were required to be jabbed or provide proof that they had previously recovered from COVID in order to work, and all those over 50 years old had to be vaccinated or they would be fined by the government on a monthly basis. (Medical clinic treating people injured by COVID shot opens in Italy.)

Italian voters, having some residual concept of Catholicism perhaps, voted in Giorgia Meloni’s party to power in large measure because they were fed up with the draconian restrictions that the previous government had put in place in complete lockstep with the quasi-totalitarians at the World Health Organization, which is nothing other than a storefront operation to indemnify Red China’s policies at every turn and works in complete cooperation with the World Economic Forum that is headed by Klaus Schwab, a believer in the “great global reset.” As of yet, though, there is no sign that there enough Americans even on the natural level to fight back as the Italians have done.

We will never know until eternity the exact number of people killed or injured in the ongoing plot by Big Pharma to make billions upon billions of dollars in the production of more and more poisons that have proved themselves not only to be ineffective in preventing one from catching Covid-19 but wind up causing even the vaccination. However, we must recognize that this is all a chastisement four our sins and those of the whole world as the vaccinators will keep vaccinating and their stooges in public and global health agencies will continue to “recommend” and/or mandate that people keep “update,” something that so many will do quite dutifully, and the more people get the jabs will be more that the spike proteins will continue to spread the virus and thus give the global lockdown elite more excuses to impose more controls upon the masses as their gloat in their own mockery of God’s Omnipotence and Omniscience. There is no end to this vicious cycle in sight, which is why we, as Catholics, must rely ever much on Our Lady’s graces.

II. Genetic Engineering and Social Utilitarianism 

This is not an overstatement as Dr. Peter A. McCullough is noting that there is now evidence proving that the mRNA vaccines are changing the human genome in even the unvaccinated as a result of the vaccine shedding about which those of us currently suffering the effects of the virus from that shedding can nothing except to embrace the crosses that have been visited upon us in reparation for our sins:

(LifeSiteNews) — In a recent interview, distinguished internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough shared how studies have indicated that synthetic mRNA from the Pfizer and Moderna experimental COVID vaccines may last permanently in the body, can also transfer to the unvaccinated, and is “changing the human genome.”

“It looks like the messenger RNA is transferring from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated now,” McCullough told Tanya Gaw from Action4Canada on November 24 (beginning at 39:24).

The Dallas-based physician has had a renowned career in the medical field, including authoring 677 articles in scientific peer-reviewed journals, and remains the most published individual in his field in history.

McCullough referenced an article of his where he cited a study by Helene Banoun showing that lipid nanoparticles that carry the mRNA spread throughout the body and “have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier.”

“And in a paper by Fertig and Colleagues, the messenger RNA is found circulating in blood for at least two weeks” (here), the physician told Gaw. “And the curves were not going down. That’s as long as they looked.”

He stated another paper “found messenger RNA in the vaccinated in lymph nodes for months. It looks like the body’s not clearing it out.”

Finally, another study “from Hanna and colleagues in JAMA showed that the messenger RNA is in the breast milk of ill-advised women who took the vaccine during pregnancy or afterwards,” he said.

Summarizing these thoughts, McCullough proposed the rhetorical question: “Could you actually take a vaccine inadvertently by close contact, kissing, sexual contact, [or] breastfeeding? It looks like the answer is ‘yes.’”

Furthermore, he explained that the mRNA has “never been demonstrated to actually leave the body. They look like they’re permanent, as well as the spike protein that’s produced after them. This is very disturbing.”

“This messenger RNA, it looks like it’s for keeps. Every shot is accumulating in the body with no ability for the body to get rid of it,” the former president of the Cardiorenal Society of America explained.

Discussing the ramifications of this, McCullough explained providing advice for his patients was very difficult. Having first advised his unvaccinated patients to “refrain from kissing and sexual contact with a vaccinated person” for 30 days, he extended it “to at least 90 days” and was considering extending it from that point forward.

“I know there’s married couples and all kinds of personal implications there,” he commented.

The cardiologist related that he had also been told these realities were impacting dating apps where now “one of the most important checkboxes is if someone’s unvaccinated. People really don’t want to date vaccinated people right now.”

Citing two more studies, McCullough conveyed another alarming finding, that since the mRNA remain in the body for an extended period of time, “it looks like they do permanently install into the human genome through what we call reverse transcription.”

“So, this is disturbing that not only does the vaccine not get out of the body, but now they’re changing the human genome. This is shown in the human hepatoma cell line. And so it’s conceivable that two vaccinated people could actually pass the code for Pfizer or Moderna into the baby permanently,” he said. “So, this is very, very disturbing.”

“The government, as they developed these vaccines, they kind of rushed it through the final stages. There was no assurances that these were safe. There was no genotoxicity, no teratogenicity studies. And in autopsy studies, the spike protein produced from the genetic material is found in the heart … [and in] the brain,” the physician explained.

“So, I can tell you everyone who has taken the vaccine has this material in their brain, their heart, their adrenal glands, [and] reproductive organs. It’s really a terrible thought. My heart goes out to people who have taken the vaccine,” he lamented.

McCullough has been a most competent and compelling critic of the draconian COVID-19 restrictions, lockdowns, and mandates imposed over the 2 1/2 years. As an alternative, he has persuasively advocated for the cultivation of natural immunity and early treatment through effective therapeutics.

The prominent doctor, who has also provided significant expert commentary on Fox News, NewsMax, and Real America, told LifeSiteNews editor-in-chief John-Henry Westen in August 2021 that “the vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and injury and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.”

In addition, McCullough described COVID-19 in September as a “biological weapon.” “It was a government operation that created SARS-CoV-2 and the spike protein,” he declared. “It’s the U.S. government that did it. And they were working on the threat and working on the response … This was all planned … SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon.”

Furthermore, during a late October conference, the internist explained why the experimental COVID-19 gene-based injections should be the presumed cause of unusually high excess death rates around the world.

He added in a later interview that “the vaccine accelerates death from other causes. So, if someone has cancer, the vaccine accelerates that. If someone has heart disease, one is more likely to have fatal heart attacks and strokes … The vaccines cause blood clotting … The vaccine is incredibly risky, and basically, it’s achieving its goal. If the goal was to reduce the world’s population, it’s working.” (Dr. McCullough: mRNA from COVID vax transfers from jabbed to unjabbed, ‘changing human genome.)

Yes, this biological warfare launched by the government of the United States of America upon its own people, and if anyone doubts that this is the case then it would be advisable for them to recognize that the production of the “vaccines” is being supervised by the United States Department of Defense:

(LifeSiteNews) — A recent analysis of documents obtained by freedom of information lawsuits reveal COVID “vaccine” manufacturers such as Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen are only “figureheads” in the production of experimental injections that are actually produced, fully controlled and distributed by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD).

Research conducted by retired pharmaceutical industry executive Alexandra Latypova discovered that “kind of like an iceberg” these biological products are “made by a consortium of companies” that are “traditional and nontraditional suppliers to the Department of Defense.”

Though the public sees Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen being represented everywhere as the products’ manufacturers, in reality they “are involved [only] somewhat in some pieces of [the production process],” Latypova told Dr. Peter McCullough in an America Out Loud interview released November 8.

In addition, “possession [of the product] is never taken by anybody other than [the] U.S. federal government,” she said, resulting in a situation where the methods of production and contents of these products “cannot be traced.”

Furthermore, not only are these biologicals produced in this “opaque black box,” but they remain the property of the U.S. government “until they are injected into the person,” which means any American who obtains the vials in order to study the contents can be prosecuted for “stealing government property” or the like. And it remains a contractual violation for governments outside the U.S. to test these products.

DOD ‘not a licensed pharmacy distributor,’ and thus do not ‘need to comply with any laws’

Additionally, since the organizational structure of the project explicitly names the DOD as “the chief operating officer of the entire enterprise” and they are “not a licensed pharmacy distributor,” Latypova said “they don’t need to comply with any laws” that govern that industry.

Therefore, though these products are not “vaccines,” or, according to Latypova, even medicines, the public naturally has presumed standard industry safeguards for such products to be in place, when this has not been the case.

For example, the distribution of these products “is not going through the licensed pharmacy distributors who are bound by a set of regulations called ‘good distribution practices,’” the scientist said.

Hence, though hospitals do not know, or can they verify, the contents or manufacturing process of these products, they just “essentially get the black box shipment and then they are supposed to inject it into people. As a doctor, you understand how illegal this is,” she told McCullough.

Severe variability in serious adverse reactions among batches points to grave violation of the law

The consortium of companies utilized by the DOD that manufacture such products include hundreds of names such as National ResilienceSnapdragonPatheonBecton, DickinsonCorningGrand RiverSio2, Texas A&M University, and many other universities, Latypova said.

It also includes Emergent Biosolutions that was the DOD’s “exclusive manufacturer of anthrax vaccine,” which also faced enormous safety issues, though it was “not forced on every person on the globe … [but just] our armed forces for a while,” she said. (US defense dept. secretly controls COVID vaccine production process that ‘cannot be traced’: researcher.)

We were warned about the power of military-industrial complex nearly sixty-two years ago when President Dwight David Eisenhower delivered his farewell address before on January 17, 1961, three days before his second and final term expired at noon on January 20, 1961:

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small,there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. (Dwight D. Eisenhower — Farewell Address.) 

Although Eisenhower did not understand that the authentic security of one’s nation is premised upon its subordination to the Social Reign of Christ the King as it must be exercised by the Catholic Church, placing him in concert with today’s conciliar officials in the counterfeit conciliar church, the late president and former five star General of the United States Army did have a keen insight into the dangers posed by the rise of what he termed so accurately as the military-industrial complex, which thrives on the constant warfare that former President George Walker Bush and his team of Trotskyite advisers envisioned as “necessary” to “secure” this country and “liberate” other peoples. We can see also, of course, that the military-industrial complex has “evolved” to the point where it is involved in Big Pharma-Big Tech-Deep State complex to mandate we must accept whatever arbitrary plan in the name of “national security” and “public health” at the present time. As if this is not bad enough, humanly speaking, it appears that, despite all the denials to the contrary, the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine line contains microchips and other self-assembling units after all:

 An Australian doctor has gone public with microscopic images of unidentified objects that appear to be “self-assembling” from the contents of Pfizer’s COVID injection.

Family physician Dr. David Nixon recently shared dark field microscopy photos of “concerning” structures that appeared in Pfizer jab fluid over time and that seem to be the product of “intelligent design” in a Sunday episode of the International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC) co-hosted by the group’s founder, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and ex-Pfizer executive Dr. Michael Yeadon.

Nixon showed how boxy, dark structures, similar in shape to crystals but with “internal structures that appear to be different from … a naturally occurring crystal,” appeared on the periphery of the slide’s jab contents after he left it out overnight.

Remarkably, the formation of the crystalline structures appeared to depend on their exposure to electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs), according to Nixon. When he put the slide “inside a faraday bag” blocking EMFs he said came from his wireless router, he only saw black, round “dots.”

However, when he “didn’t shield the site,” only the angular, crystal-like formations “would appear the next morning.”

While discussing Nixon’s findings, Dr. Yeadon advised that further experiments were needed to ascertain if it was indeed the presence of EMFs, as opposed to other variables such as “temperature or air currents,” that affected the structures’ formation.

Other reports have been made that EMFs affect the formation of structures within the COVID jabs. Ecuador-based electrical engineer Matt Taylor testified on the Stew Peters show that when he put a drop of the COVID jab on a microscope slide and placed that slide on an internet router, he observed the self-assembly of what he believes “look like integrated circuits.”

According to Taylor, when he turned the router off, the objects “immediately” began to break apart. He repeated the experiment three times and “begg[ed]” people to reproduce his investigation to see if his findings can be replicated. In fact, Nixon indicated that Taylor had inspired his own test with the faraday bag.

Electrical engineer Shimon Yanowitz added during the ICIC discussion that he believes Nixon and Taylor’s work are “in corroboration with each other,” and that Nixon has observed “the exact same phenomena found by Matt Taylor,” except with the distinct appearance yielded by dark field microscopy.

Nixon went on to show that after leaving the injection fluid out on the slide for 10 weeks, the crystalline formations seemed to have morphed to take on the “appearance of a much more concerning nature.”

The structures Nixon showed maintained angular shapes, but now appeared to contain one or more bright light-reflecting points, in addition to other interior formations. The close-ups of these objects were photographed at 200x magnification, Nixon told LifeSiteNews.

The structures, which Nixon at this point describes as “chips,” were now present not only on the periphery of the slide’s jab contents but all throughout it.

Nixon shared with LifeSiteNews a video running at 200x speed that highlighted both relatively small and large lights that seemed to suddenly appear in the “chip.”

The chips were also “often associated with” new ribbon-like objects that Nixon now describes as “wires” — that is, they often appeared alongside the “wires.”

Nixon said on Friday that he has seen similar “wire” formations in the blood of the vaccinated and shared with LifeSiteNews a picture in which one can see clumping blood cells surrounding the “wire” with the “frayed edges” Nixon said are often present.

Another of Nixon’s remarkable findings was that he had “discovered all of these structures disappeared overnight,” “except for a couple.” He said that these remaining structures also “slowly disappeared” over time, and he showed a time-lapse video he captured of one of the crystalline objects in which it appeared to shrink until it disappeared.

He has shared video footage of this phenomenon on his website, noting that chips “literally melt away.”

While it is unclear to Nixon what the structures are and what their purpose is, he believes “it seems to be acting in a way that would suggest it’s electronic.”

Nixon told LifeSiteNews he has “spent hours” looking at his video footage “with IT and engineering colleagues,” and that they have drawn “comparisons with the electronic components that they are familiar with.”

Alexandra Latypova remarked in a prior statement to LifeSiteNews that while she cannot discern what Nixon’s findings are, “we know size alone is problematic since these are observable under standard optical microscope, so these are very large structures.”

Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea pointed out during the ICIC group discussion that corroboration of Nixon’s findings is not easy to come by, since in the United States, for example, “it is a criminal offense to look at the Pfizer vials.”

“And so the people who are asking for rigorousness, which would be [a] university-setting type of scientific elaboration, we cannot provide this … It should be the pharmaceutical companies, the FDA and the CDC who prove or disprove us and really show that they are doing the studies to say, ‘What is this?’”

“Because we … don’t even have the means to be able to do this with a scientific rigor that would be acceptable to the scientists who are denying this possibility,” Mihalcea remarked.

Interestingly, at least two electrical engineers — Yanowitz and Taylor — believe that what they have seen in the COVID injections under a microscope looks like electronic “circuits,” and they and others have also described findings of “self-assembling” jab structures.

Yanowitz, who cited “a lot of background in microscopy and microelectronic fabrication,” asserted regarding Nixon’s findings that “when you look at this thing from the point of view of an electrical engineer, you have nothing but to assume that this is an electronic circuit that is self-assembling right before your eyes.”

“I also have to say that on my side, I found in addition to what seems like electronics, I found other structures self-assembling,” Yanowitz said.

“So this is not just the materials and the excipients that are in those vials. It’s this amazingly advanced technology that seems to make new things out of these materials and excipients,” he added.

Among other unidentified objects from the COVID jab that he said “could be ribbons, filaments, [and] tubes” of some kind, Yanowitz captured images of what he called “electronic circuitry,” which he again emphasized was not visible in the vial itself but appeared from the contents of the vial over time after what he asserted was a “self-assembly” process.

Yanowitz said he had placed the vial contents in an “actual incubator of body temperature,” which​ “did speed up the self-assembly by quite a bit.”

Dr. Carrie Madej, who examined the contents of different COVID jabs under the microscope from different manufacturers, has also observed what she referred to as the “self-assembling” of unidentified objects from the Moderna injection.

In the Pfizer jab, Madej saw “something that looks similar to teslaphoresis,” which is “when these little graphite-like black, metallic particles start to coalesce into strings, like a spider web. They do that through any external force — it could be light, it could be a magnetic force, it could be an impulse, like a frequency.”

Karen Kingston, who used to do marketing work for Pfizer, pointed out Sunday that “80 percent” of the “ingredients, the manufacturing process, and the toxicity” of the COVID jabs was “redacted under the FDA law since it was approved.”

“We have the right under FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) to know what those ingredients are. These are not biologics,” Kingston said.

“So any expert who’s saying they’re 100 percent confident there’s no nanotec
ingredients are redacted?” she added.

Dr. Fuellmich highlighted Kingston’s point and the legal importance of the uncertainty of what exactly these COVID jab structures are.

“What we do know is that this stuff doesn’t belong in there,” said Fuellmich, going on to point out that informed consent to the injections is impossible without knowledge of their full contents.

“You cannot consent to something that you don’t know anything about. Information is everything,” Fuellmich went on.

Concern over the safety of the COVID jabs has been increasing not only as reports of death and injury directly in response to the injections are being made via the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) but also as excess deaths have spiked considerably since the rollout of the COVID injections in 2021.

Last January, Scott Davison, the president of OneAmerica insurance in Indianapolis, highlighted the industry’s astonishing 40% increase in 2021 third-quarter death rates, which were the highest the company has “seen in the history of the business.”

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So, 40% is just unheard of.”

Entrepreneur-turned-journalist Steve Kirsch has explained such a catastrophe would only happen by pure chance every 2.8e32 years, which is “basically never.” (Australian doctor finds chips, ‘self-assembling’ structures forming in Pfizer vaccine contents.)

Dr. McCullough has been in the forefront of the fight to treat those suffering from the virus with the proper protocols that are suitable to each patient’s condition and medical ¸Yes, the goal has been and continues to be the reduction of the world’s population, which has been the goal of British eugenicists in the late Nineteenth Century and that of Margaret Sanger and the population controllers that have followed her in the past century. Contraception, the surgical execution of the innocent preborn, euthanasia, suicide, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, “brain death”/human organ vivisection, the starvation and dehydration of innocent human beings, and the whole “quality of life” standard of global “health care” have always been about reducing the world’s population, a goal that has been a paramount one for the ideologues obsessing about “global climate control.” The modern pantheists are now out in the open and have begun to advocate for human extinction, something that the likes of Drs. Peter Singer and Paul Ehrlich only approached obliquely by means of their ceaseless work against God’s command to Adam and Eve to “multiply and increase” so that He could have adorers here on here as members of the Church Militant and in Heaven thereafter as members of the Church Triumphant.

The latest in the long line of utilitarians to advocate for human extinction is championing the “feed, don’t breed slogan as a means of eliminating pollution from the earth even though they are supreme polluters of truth and blasphemers of the very first order:

An advocate of human extinction Tuesday called on everyone to voluntarily stop having children for humanity to die out and give the biosphere a “chance to recover.” 

Tuesday’s Dr. Phil episode focused on the ethics of procreation and the debate over overpopulation where Voluntary Human Extinction Movement founder Les Knight delivered a variety of shocking statements.

“You’re involved with an extinction movement who basically say we just need to live long and die out, we just need to ‘feed, not breed,’ is that what you say?” Dr Phil asked Knight.

“’Feed ‘em don’t breed ‘em,’ yes, that’s right, we’re not taking care of the people who are already here,” Knight responded.

Knight went on to illustrate his proposition, “My plan is for everyone to think before they procreate, and if people really think about it, think it all the way through, and have the wherewithal not to procreate – which is a really big problem all over the planet – and if people think about it as you mentioned, 44% of young people are saying ‘no I don’t think I wanna do that,’ just because they’ve thought about it.”

He then laid out his ideology’s optimal conclusion, “And if we all stopped procreating we’ll go extinct, slowly, we’ll clean up our messes as we go, and the biosphere – what’s left of it, will have a chance to recover.”

He later suggested that “reproductive freedom” is “the most important thing we need today,” claiming that “hundreds of millions of couples are denied their right to not procreate.”

Knight elaborated that many do not have the “contraceptive services – reproductive health services that they need. Those are not provided, and maybe people should supply their own, but they can’t afford it because they’re having more offspring that they can’t feed.”

He gave one example of the difficulties people face trying to avoid procreation: “Try to get a sterilization here in America when you haven’t had kids and you’re only 22.” He later added, “We’re not allowing people to not breed.”

When a panelist who was an expert on fertility suggested that copper IUD’s are widely used for contraception, another guest suggested many cannot be trusted to be that responsible. 

Content creator Anton Daniels said these irresponsible people end up having to be taken care of “whether it be the prisons that we built for them, or the social services that we have to create for them, and they do not become more educated and do things differently. They breed more, that’s what happens.

Knight, despite advocating the extinction of the human race,  last week received an adoring profile in The New York Times, even being compared to the late “Mr. Rogers” of television fame. 

“Tall and gentle, Mr. Knight comes across as clear-eyed and thoughtful, like a mash-up of Bill Nye and Fred Rogers. While Mr. Knight may be against the creation of more humans, he shows great compassion for the ones that already exist,” the profile read. (Extinction activist wants humans to voluntarily die out: ‘Feed ‘em, don’t breed ‘em’.)

Utopians such as Les Knight have no regard for these plain words of Sacred Scripture about the fact that God created the earth for human beings, not human beings for the earth:

In the beginning God created heaven, and earth. [2] And the earth was void and empty, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the spirit of God moved over the waters. [3] And God said: Be light made. And light was made. [4] And God saw the light that it was good; and he divided the light from the darkness. [5] And he called the light Day, and the darkness Night; and there was evening and morning one day.

[6] And God said: Let there be a firmament made amidst the waters: and let it divide the waters from the waters. [7] And God made a firmament, and divided the waters that were under the firmament, from those that were above the firmament, and it was so. [8] And God called the firmament, Heaven; and the evening and morning were the second day. [9] God also said: Let the waters that are under the heaven, be gathered together into one place: and let the dry land appear. And it was so done. [10] And God called the dry land, Earth; and the gathering together of the waters, he called Seas. And God saw that it was good.

[11] And he said: Let the earth bring forth the green herb, and such as may seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after its kind, which may have seed in itself upon the earth. And it was so done. [12] And the earth brought forth the green herb, and such as yieldeth seed according to its kind, and the tree that beareth fruit, having seed each one according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. [13] And the evening and the morning were the third day. [14] And God said: Let there be lights made in the firmament of heaven, to divide the day and the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years: [15] To shine in the firmament of heaven, and to give light upon the earth. And it was so done.

[16] And God made two great lights: a greater light to rule the day; and a lesser light to rule the night: and the stars. [17] And he set them in the firmament of heaven to shine upon the earth. [18] And to rule the day and the night, and to divide the light and the darkness. And God saw that it was good. [19] And the evening and morning were the fourth day. [20] God also said: Let the waters bring forth the creeping creature having life, and the fowl that may fly over the earth under the firmament of heaven.

[16] “Two great lights”: God created on the first day, light, which being moved from east to west, by its rising and setting, made morning and evening. But on the fourth day he ordered and distributed this light, and made the sun, moon, and stars. The moon, though much less than the stars, is here called a great light, from its giving a far greater light to the earth than any of them.

[21] And God created the great whales, and every living and moving creature, which the waters brought forth, according to their kinds, and every winged fowl according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. [22] And he blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the waters of the sea: and let the birds be multiplied upon the earth. [23] And the evening and morning were the fifth day. [24] And God said: Let the earth bring forth the living creature in its kind, cattle and creeping things, and beasts of the earth, according to their kinds. And it was so done. [25] And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds, and cattle, and every thing that creepeth on the earth after its kind. And God saw that it was good.

[26] And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth. [27] And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. [28] And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth. [29] And God said: Behold I have given you every herb bearing seed upon the earth, and all trees that have in themselves seed of their own kind, to be your meat: [30] And to all beasts of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to all that move upon the earth, and wherein there is life, that they may have to feed upon. And it was so done.

[31] And God saw all the things that he had made, and they were very good. And the evening and morning were the sixth day. (Genesis 1: 1-31.)

Pantheistic utopians such as Les Knight and others reject all this. They do not believe in the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, as they believe in no “god” as their evolutionists who deny Special Creation and who are utterly ignorant of the fact that the whole order of the created world is not going to last forever, that it will end in God’s good time when His Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, comes to judge the living and the dead the General Judgment on the Last Day.

Moreover, even the physical universe is permanent scarred by the effects of man’s rebellion against God by means of Original Sin and its further scarred and rent into disorder by the effects of our Actual Sins. These pantheists thus do not understand that even without their impossible dream of a world without human beings, which cannot exist as the world will end when the last true priest dies or is killed and the world is deprived of that which makes its existence possible, Actual Graces, which flow forth from the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, lightning strikes would produce fires, the earth would still quake, animals would still pollute streams and rivers all on their very own. Their dream of a world unspoiled by humans is a fantasy as it cannot exist. There can be so such thing. They are fools who are literally hellbent on their own eternal destruction even though they lack the supernatural ability to see that this is so.

III. All About Complete Red Chinese-Style Social Control, Not Public Health

One of the first points that I made in this ongoing series, which began on March 25, 2020, the Feast of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, was that the entire plandemic narrative was about social control and had nothing to do with genuine public health. Social engineers in the government and academe teamed up with Big Pharma and with the globalists in the World Health Organization and World Economic Forum, international bankers, leaders of nonprofit organizations such as the Soros Foundation, and executives from the commerce and social media industries to use the outbreak of the SARS Cov2 virus in late-2019/early-2020 to use the Red Chinese Model of lockdowns against which, remarkably, some in that prison nation have been rebelling recently after their being reimposed following outbreaks of the virus caused by the spike proteins being spready by the vaccines, as the means to “stop” the virus when what they wanted to accomplish was the entire restructuring of human life.

These sociopaths—and there is no other word that describes them—are so amoral as to believe that Red China’s forced repression of dissenting views is the model to use in the “civilized” West and they did not care how many private businesses foundered, how many people without Our Lady’s graces to carry the crosses of the moment committed suicide, how many people simply gave up on life and became wards of the civil state. They did not care how many people lost their life’s savings or how much everyone was hurt by “social distancing” and their mask mandates that dehumanized individuals and then divided families, friends, neighbors, parishioners, coworkers, and other acquaintances on the basis of conformity to the high priests and priestesses of “public health,” chief among them, of course, being the utter reprobate named Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Although even high-ranking officials in the administration of President Donald John Trump such as Dr. Peter Navarro, have sought to downplay the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the source of a man-made virus, funded, of course, with monies provided by Fauci’s own National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the truth remains as it was asserted by Dr. Francis Boyle in an interview that was republished in Christian Order in February of 2022, namely, that the virus originated in that “biosafety” laboratory. More and more people are speaking out about this truth now, especially in light of the murderous Xi Jinping’s efforts to impose more lockdowns in Red China to fight new outbreaks of the virus caused by vaccine shedding:

A scientist who worked at a controversial research lab in China has claimed that COVID was a man-made virus that leaked from the facility, according to a report.

Andrew Huff said COVID leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China two years ago and blamed authorities for the “biggest US intelligence failure since 9/11,” Britain’s The Sun reported Saturday.

The lab has been at the center of fierce debates about the origins of COVID, with both Chinese government officials and lab personnel denying that the virus leaked from the facility.

Huff, an epidemiologist said in his new book, The Truth About Wuhan, that the pandemic was the result of the US government’s funding of coronaviruses in China.

He said that China’s gain-of-function experiments, which were carried out with lax security, led to a lab leak at the Wuhan lab.

“Foreign laboratories did not have the adequate control measures in place for ensuring proper biosafety, biosecurity, and risk management, ultimately resulting in the lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said in his book, which was exclusively excerpted in the newspaper.

Over the last two years, increasing evidence has suggested that the virus was leaked from the lab.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a state-run and funded research facility home to China’s riskiest coronavirus research, has been under immense pressure by the ruling Chinese Communist Party to produce scientific breakthroughs to raise China’s global status despite lacking resources, according to a recent investigation published by ProPublica/Vanity Fair. (Scientist who worked at Wuhan lab says COVID man-made virus.)

The evidence about this was available in early-2020. However, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins of the National Institutes of Health, the leaders of the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum not only buried this truth but used Red China’s brutal approach to fight a virus created by means of gain-of-function studies in one of its own laboratories as the model for locking down Western countries and then spending a great deal of their time suppressing all dissent from their cookie-cutter, one size fits all protocols that produced most of the disease’s victims as the entirety of social fabric was corrupted by falsehoods upon falsehoods.

Fauci, who is retiring soon from his position as the director of the United States Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is so arrogant as to believe he can flaunt his disregard for the truth, including the truth of his bare-knuckle efforts to repress anyone, no matter how well qualified or credentialed, who dared to criticize him, the murderous protocols advanced by the United States Centers for Disease Control, the vaccines, lockdowns, mask and social distancing mandates. Fauci alone represented the demigod of science, and he did not brook any opposition, which is why he has such admiration for the Red Chinese model of repression. He is tyrant and a thug.

Even several secular sources recognize that this is so:

There’s no ambiguity about hegemon USA’s angel of death and human misery, its modern-day Joseph Mengele.

Since the early 1980s, more monster than man Fauci’s anti-public health history has been pockmarked by crimes against humanity.

He transformed US public health regulation “into an incubator for” Pharma profiteering and his own self-enrichment, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. explained — at the expense of healthcare as it should be.

Throughout the US/West, sickness is prioritized over wellness because the latter is unprofitable.

In response to his announced December retirement as NIAID head and chief Biden regime medical fraudster, GOP Rep. Steve Scalise said the following:

“Congressional (Dems) refused to hold a single hearing on (all things flu/covid or (the Biden regime) financial involvement in gain-of-function research.”

“That will change when House Republicans take the majority next year.” 

Fauci will be subpoenaed to testify “before Congress under oath (to explain) wrongful mandates (he was involved in) impos(ing) on Americans.”

During his time in government, the US became one of the developed world’s least healthy societies.

Americans have shorter lifespans, more illnesses and injuries — despite around double the per capita amount spent on healthcare compared to other developed countries.

In cahoots with Pharma, large hospital chains, and insurers, US ruling regimes — especially Dem-controlled ones — prioritize profits at the expense of health.

Pre-Thanksgiving weekend, Missouri and Louisiana AGs, Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry respectively, deposed Fauci at length.

While his testimony is sealed at this time, Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft and attorney John Burns were present to witness his deposition first hand.

They watched him “squirm, stall and lie for seven hours,” GT reported, adding:

“(T)he sheer volume of things (he) ‘couldn’t recall,’ along with his obvious attempts at providing misleading and deceptive responses damned his testimony.”

His public life has been pockmarked by Big Lies and mass deception about all things public health with intent to harm it over the other way around.

He admitted that China’s January 2020 (health and freedom-destroying) lockdown got him to push the same thing on mind-manipulated Americans.

He admitted privately that masks don’t work but pushed their use anyway.

Earlier he infamously claimed to “represent science.”

During his deposition, he falsely claimed that failure to follow the (fabricated) official narrative on all things flu/covid “encourages people to avoid lifesaving interventions (that) result in the unnecessary death of people whose lives would have been saved” — a bald-faced Big Lie. 

He argued against use of known safe and effective protocols to push health-destroying kill shots.

In response to his deposition, AG Landry — now LA senator-elect — said the following:

“It was amazing to spend 7 hours (with the) man who single-handedly wrecked the US economy (and lives of millions of Americans) based on (what he falsely called) science.”

Then while under oath, he couldn’t “recall practically anything dealing with his (flu/covid) response.”

And this from AG Schmitt:

The only 2020 science was politicized to dump Trump.

According to Fauci’s perversion of reality: 

“The rest of us ‘don’t have the ability’ to determine what’s best for ourselves.”

“This is the…guy who locked our country down and ruined countless lives and livelihoods.”

Schmitt called him a “tinpot tyrant,” a medical fraudster.

And as NIAIA head, he’s the highest paid US official — $480,654 his most recent salary, his pension to be $375,211.

And he’s profited hugely from books, payments for public appearances and other compensation, including from Pharma for services rendered.

A doctor who never treated a patient — who for nearly 40 years operated in cahoots with genocidist Bill Gates, US dark forces and Pharma profiteers — benefitted hugely at the expense of public health.

RFK, Jr. earlier called him “a mix between (con man) Bernie Madoff, (defender of powerful interests at the expense of ordinary people) J. Edgar Hoover,” and a mafia crime boss — instead of defender of public health.

Time and again on national television, he willfully lied to viewers in pursuit of his diabolical health-destroying aims.

On multiple Sunday propaganda TV shows, he once again showed up to lie and mass deceive about all things flu/covid — perhaps for the last time as NIAID head.

Since flu/covid mass-jabbing began, never once did he explain that no emergency existed earlier or now.

Nothing justifies emergency use authorization for rushed-to-market, inadequately tested, hazardous-to-health kill shots.

Based on science — the real thing — nothing justifies everything mandated or recommended on all things flu/covid.

No pandemic exists, not earlier or now, just an invented one to push what’s destroying public health, not protecting and preserving it.

On Sunday, Fauci once again recited his customary litany of bald-faced Big Lies.

Throughout his public life, he’s lied and mass deceived repeatedly, once again to Sunday viewers of propaganda TV.

He lied claiming that “we certainly are still in” a pandemic when nothing of the sort exists.

He lied saying that daily flu/covid deaths are “between 300 and 400.”

The vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths attributed to the viral illness were willfully misdiagnosed — a fear-mongering scheme to mind-manipulate maximum numbers of people to unwittingly self-inflict harm from kill shots.

Fauci has been in the vanguard of what’s all about mass-extermination of unwanted millions and billions of people, along with eliminating what little remains of greatly eroded freedoms.

Claiming what he recommended has been “based on good public health principles” is worlds apart from his health-destroying agenda.

Why has he escaped accountability for the mother of all health-destroying scams?

Why hasn’t he been prosecuted, convicted, sentenced and confined behind bars where he belongs?

Separately, London-based Oncology Professor, Dr. Angus George Dalgleish, said the following by open letter to the British Medical Journal’s editor-in-chief on flu/covid mass-jabbing:

“The link with clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is now well accepted, as is the link with myelitis and neuropathy.”

Calling for a halt to mass-jabbing, he stressed the following:

“As a practicizing oncologist, I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel.”

“I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters.”

“This must be aired and debated immediately.”

Results of a study by researchers at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital found “that the incidence of early onset cancers — including breast, colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, and pancreas — dramatically increased around the world” after mass-jabbing began.

There’s no ambiguity about the link between flu/covid jabs and dramatic increase in numbers of individuals becoming ill from cancer, heart disease and other major health-destroying illnesses.

The CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID and Fauci personally lied about all things flu/covid related, especially about kill shots.

An explosion of serious illnesses followed their introduction.

Everyone jabbed was irreparably harmed, their life span shortened — the more jabs gotten, the greater the harm to health.

Unjabbed individuals are profoundly safer than their jabbed counterparts.

As long as the mother of all state-sponsored scams goes on, millions more people will suffer, become disabled and die prematurely from kill shots designed to destroy public health.

Instead of exposing and denouncing what’s going on, MSM and hospitals were bribed with big bucks to support the most diabolical state-sponsored scheme of all time — with no end of it in prospect.

“And we call ourselves the human race” — with attribution to JFK’s denunciation of dark forces around him for nuking Soviet Russia into submission during his tenure while the US had a military advantage. (More Monster Than Man Fauci’s Last Hurrah? (According to Fauci’s perversion of reality: “The rest of us ‘don’t have the ability’ to determine what’s best for ourselves.”.)

Dr. Anthony Fauci announced this summer that he’d be stepping down from various government positions in December, in order to pursue the “next chapter” of his life and career.  With his protracted farewell tour underway, I’d argue that his departure can’t come soon enough.  In an interview with CBS News over the weekend, Fauci tried to blame the Trump administration for the Chinese Communist Party’s flagrant cover-up on COVID’s origins.  As others have noted, his timeline here is wrong — and his view of how matters should have been investigated and settled is embarrassingly naive:

The ‘horse out of the barn,’ to borrow his phrase, was COVID itself, and it was out of the proverbial barn for months prior to Fauci’s designated antagonist — Donald Trump — began criticizing Beijing over its scandalous handling of the pandemic’s emergence.  Also, the notion that the issue of COVID’s origins could have been settled among scientists, with ‘politics’ left out of it, is preposterous.  The CCP reflexively punished medical professionals and scientists, among others, who spoke out in those early days.  They run a closed, authoritarian government; the idea that they’d have permitted their scientists to operate with a free hand to pursue the truth is laughable.  They interfered at every single step, determined to obscure and bury what happened.  They’re still doing things like roughing up and arresting western journalists.  Let’s also recall that Fauci himself also had a hand in diminishing the viable-to-probable ‘lab leak’ theory early on, receiving personal thanks for doing so from a man who (like the CCP) was heavily invested in the suppression of that important line of inquiry.  And it was actively suppressed for quite some time.
I won’t assert that Fauci is willfully spreading Chinese propaganda, but I can’t imagine Chairman Xi and his henchmen are too disappointed to see the American media’s favorite doctor pointing the finger at the “accusatory” Trump administration for supposedly causing the Chinese government’s “flinch back” posture on COVID origins.  Meanwhile, here is how things have been going in China, where the regime’s truly insane ‘zero COVID’ approach (bizarrely cheered on by a neurotic quasi-journalist at the Washington Post) is facing remarkable and deserved backlash from a population not accustomed to resisting any of its government’s decrees.  

And yet, nonsense like this continues in various parts of the country.  It’s long past time for Fauci to exit stage left.  (Get Fauci Off the Stage.)

or seven hours, Fauci was bombarded with questions from now-Missouri Sen.-elect Schmitt, Missouri Solicitor General John Sauer, and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, who ostentatiously displayed two books on his desk to rattle the star witness: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s excoriating “The Real Anthony Fauci,” and John M. Barry’s pandemic classic about the 1918 Spanish flu: “The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Plague in History.”

While the transcript of the deposition is a day or two from being published, various participants have described Fauci’s demeanor as cocky, deceitful and quick-witted, despite his 81 years.

There was no humility or admission of fallibility, no reflection that the lockdowns may have done more harm than good, especially to children’s schooling, or that vaccine mandates were pointlessly divisive.

Fauci exhibited stress when he was asked why he dismissed the “Wuhan lab leak” theory of the origins of COVID in favor of the less plausible “natural” hypothesis, and denied knowing about the proxy funding of dangerous gain-of-function research on viruses by the National Institutes of Health, where he is director of infectious diseases.

He also was prickly when asked why he dismissed the advice of eminent medicos from the most prestigious universities in the US and the UK, who penned the Great Barrington Declaration in October 2020, urging a less extreme, more scientifically orthodox way of dealing with the virus, by focusing on protecting the old and infirm while letting young and healthy people live normally.

Instead, Fauci insisted on following the “China lockdown” model, not that he allowed himself to say “lockdown” during his deposition, since news reports out of China have rather tarnished the word, with protests erupting after COVID-infected citizens were burned alive in their apartments after being welded in.

No, Fauci preferred the vague term “social distancing,” says Jenin Younes, litigation lawyer with the New Civil Liberties Alliance, who was representing plaintiffs at the deposition, including two authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor of medicine and a health economist, and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a Harvard University professor of medicine and infectious-disease epidemiologist.

Their claim is that the Biden administration and Big Tech colluded to suppress, censor and smear them and to silence legitimate scientific views that opposed Fauci’s.

Fauci denied being part of a propaganda campaign with his boss at the time, Francis Collins, to discredit the Great Barrington authors, despite emails between the pair planning a “swift and devastating takedown” of what Collins called “fringe epidemiologists.”

Fauci was similarly forgetful about any role he played in social-media censorship of dissenting views.

But Schmitt is confident the facts will emerge.

“What’s become clear in this lawsuit and in Dr. Fauci’s deposition,” he said Wednesday, “is that when Fauci speaks, Big Tech ­censors.”

Musk should hurry up and release all the files on Twitter’s massive censorship operation ­before it’s too late. (As Elon Musk fights censorship, states take aim at Fauci, Big Tech       .)

Anthony Fauci’s exit, though, will do nothing to change the narrative that is still being spun by the ideologues within the administration of the Chief Grifter, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., which features another smug academician who, without having treated a single patient infected with the SARS Cov2 virus, has had the audacity to disparage the protocols used by Dr. Peter McCullough and others for the early treatment of the virus with hydroxychloroquine:

At at press briefing on November 22, White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator, Dr. Ashish Jha, reiterated that God gave us two arms in order to receive multiple vaccines and boosters. I write “reiterated” because he made the same stupid remark at a press briefing back in September.

I wasn’t surprised when the Biden Administration appointed Dr. Jha to serve as its Covid Czar. As we recount in our book, Dr. Jha was the minority witness at Senator Ron Johnson’s Senate November 19, 2020 hearing on Early Outpatient Treatment. This hearing began with testimony from Drs. Peter McCullough, Harvey Risch, and George Fareed on the safety and efficacy of repurposed, FDA-approved drugs for treating COVID-19—especially in the disease’s early stage—to prevent hospitalization and death.

Following their testimony, Dr. Jha testified that their observations and findings were erroneous. In fact, he claimed, there were no effective early treatments for COVID-19, and that our best and only hope was the vaccine that was then in development.

An especially dramatic and somewhat comical moment in the hearing occurred when Dr. George Fareed said, “I wonder if Dr. Jha actually treats patients by the way he talks.” Senator Johnson took this remark as a cue for querying Dr. Jha.

“Have you treated any Covid patients,” Senator Johnson asked.

“I have not, sir,” Dr. Jha replied. As we relate this scene in our book:

Dr. Jha had splendid academic credentials to match his splendid manners, but at this moment he lost a lot of credibility. It was perhaps the equivalent of an aeronautical engineer admitting that he’d never flown in a plane, or a marital counselor admitting he’d never been married.

He implied that Professor Risch—a distinguished epidemiologist twenty years his senior—was categorically wrong in his interpretation of the data. Then he implied that Dr. Fareed’s observations as a treating physician were an illusion—that the high-risk patients who received the Zelenko Protocol would have recovered in the same dramatic way without the intervention.

This was probably the most notable moment in the hearing. Since graduating from medical school in 1970, Dr. Fareed had logged fifty years as a medical researcher and treating physician. It would be hard to find a doctor in the entire country with more clinical experience. He testified to the U.S. Senate that he’d successfully treated 1,000 high-risk COVID-19 patients. A few minutes later, a doctor 25 years his junior—one who’d never treated a single COVID-19 patient—asserted that “there is now clear consensus in the medical and scientific community” that a key ingredient of Dr. Fareed’s treatment protocol doesn’t work. In effect, Dr. Jha told Dr. Fareed to reject the evidence of his own eyes and ears.

Shortly after the hearing, Dr. Jha published an opinion piece for the November 24, 2020, edition of the New York Times titled “The Snake-Oil Salesman of the Senate.” He opened with likening the event to a contagion.

There was a super-spreader event last week in the United States Senate. It wasn’t the coronavirus, however, that was spreading, but misinformation. … The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee held a hearing about early treatment for COVID-19. Yet instead of a robust discussion about promising emerging therapies or what Congress might do to accelerate such treatments, the conversation was all about the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine. … Neither Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin Republican senator nor his chosen witnesses—three doctors who have pushed hydroxychloroquine—displayed more than a passing interest in evidence. Intuition and personal experiences of individual doctors were acclaimed as guiding principles.[i]

Dr. Jha didn’t mention that he himself had focused his Senate remarks on hydroxychloroquine and hadn’t mentioned any “promising emerging therapies” apart from vaccines. He also didn’t state the names or credentials of the hearing’s witnesses or a summary of their findings or experiences. He compared them to the snake oil salesmen from the frontier past with their advocacy of the drug that President Trump had touted in the spring, implying they were equally lacking in medical sophistication.

     “I was called reckless because I pointed to facts that could prevent people from getting the treatment,” he wrote, but he didn’t state these facts. The online version of his essay hyperlinked the word “reckless” to a similar hatchet job report on the hearing in the Washington Post. He claimed the witnesses had expressed a distrust of science and had even “suggested that scientists were part of a ‘deep state’ conspiracy to deny Americans access to lifesaving therapies.” This was, he asserted, “a powerful reminder that not even Congress is immune to toxic conspiracy theories…”

Dr. Jha’s New York Times opinion was, itself, evidence that early treatment of COVID-19 was the subject of a well-orchestrated smear campaign. Why else would such a distinguished academic pen such rank propaganda against his colleagues and their work? That he was personally stung by the revelation that he’d never treated a single COVID-19 patient could only partly account for it.

 A possible answer to this question may be gleaned from Dr. Jha’s remarks at a January 10, 2017, Georgetown University conference titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration.” Like the participants at the October 2019 Pandemic Simulation Exercise at Johns Hopkins, Dr. Jha predicted that a devastating pandemic “is going to come at some point.” Dr. Fauci, the keynote speaker, made a more precise prediction.

         “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” he proclaimed. “The thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.”[ii]

As psychiatrist and author Peter Breggin, MD, remarked in his extraordinary book COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, Dr Jha did not speak in a somber tone about the coming devastation. On the contrary, he emphasized that he was excited about the ambitious project of helping the U.S. and other governments, and equally excited about the many pandemic preparation events in Georgetown and Cambridge that lay ahead. The conference was, he said, the “beginning of a journey.”[iii]

Dr. Jha and his colleagues were animated with the same excitement that denizens of the military-industrial complex would feel at the prospect of a coming war in which they would assume leadership positions. At last, they would be able to deploy all of their forces. With the recognition that the coming war was inevitable, they could call upon the government to allocate far more resources for new technologies, weapons systems, bases, and military organizations. In an atmosphere of such heady excitement, the suggestion of defusing the coming war with diplomacy wouldn’t be received with much enthusiasm.

The irony of Dr. Jha’s excitement is that, when the pandemic he predicted arrived three years later, he didn’t attempt to treat patients or scramble to find consultants to intervene against the disease before it wrecked bodies and imprisoned people in hospitals. Instead, he penned propaganda against hydroxychloroquine and against Drs. McCullough, Risch, and Fareed. Why was the New York Times Editorial Board compelled to publish his misleading account of the Senate hearing? Did the editors even watch the C-SPAN recording of it?

It’s not plausible that their motive was a concern about hydroxychloroquine’s safety. Dr. Jha himself conceded in his testimony that he wasn’t particularly concerned about safety, so why the vast and ceaseless quibbling about whether its efficacy for outpatients had been proven? As Senator Johnson had said in the hearing, this makes no sense. (John Leake, “Courageous Discourse” newsletter, November 28, 2022.)

Ideologues must create their own alternative realities, which is what the homosexual collective’s leading acolytes have done by pushing and pushing and pushing the insanity that has infected and corrupted even ordinary discourse as it denies basic biological truths to force everyone to anesthetize their guilty consciences and make those who understand reality and call it as such feel the guilt that motivates them to be ceaseless in their efforts at gaining universal acceptance and acquiescence.

The globalist ideologues masquerading as “scientists,” academicians, lawyers, “journalists,” hospital administrators, corporate executives have done the exact same thing as they seek to gain universal acceptance to and acquiescence about their claims to infallibility on whatever contradictory statement or pronouncement du jour they assert demands our assent. This why the courageous Dr. Peter McCullough is under attack to the point where his entire professional career of unparalleled distinction in his field is in jeopardy of being yanked away from him:

Eminent COVID-19 expert, prolific researcher, and physician Dr. Peter McCullough is being systematically stripped of his medical credentials including, most recently, his board certification to practice internal medicine and cardiology.

McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist who has 677 articles published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and remains the most published individual in his field. He was also, until recently, an editor of two major medical journals and President of the Cardiorenal Society of America.

“He’s sacrificed everything so he can speak the truth about the COVID polices,” wrote entrepreneur-turned-journalist Steve Kirsch in an October 29 Substack article.

“He’s one of the most respected cardiologists in the world. He’s been right about everything throughout the pandemic,” Kirsch added. “If there was one COVID advisor that the government should be listening to, Dr. Peter McCullough would be at the top of every list.”

Yet, without due process, McCullough was stripped of his duties as Editor-In-Chief of two medical journals and even of his board certifications in internal medicine and cardiology, Kirsch reported.

In a correspondence to Kirsch, McCullough wrote:

I was terminated as the Editor-In-Chief of Cardiorenal Medicine and Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine after years of service and rising impact factors. There was no phone call, no board meeting, no due process. Just e-mails or certified letters. Powerful dark forces are working in academic medicine to expunge any resistance to the vax.

Yesterday I was stripped of my board certifications in Internal Medicine and Cardiology after decades of perfect clinical performance, board scores, and hundreds of peer reviewed publications.

None of this will stop until there is a ‘needle in every arm.’

The announcement of McCullough’s departure from Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine acknowledged that under his guidance as Editor-in-Chief the publication became “truly international” and elevated its impact factor from 0.4 to 2.93 with ranked growth of “even higher than 3” anticipated to be reported at a later date. “The journal could not achieve such a great success without [McCullough’s] help,” the statement reads.

In August, McCullough told LifeSiteNews that he had received notice of potential disciplinary action from the American Board of Internal Medicine because of his stance on the COVID-19 response.

Having testified before a US Senate Committee, and legislative bodies in Texas, Colorado, New Hampshire and South Carolina, along with many other forums, McCullough has been a most competent and compelling critic of the draconian COVID-19 restrictions, lockdowns, and mandates imposed over the past two and a half years. As an alternative, he has persuasively advocated for the cultivation of natural immunity and early treatment through effective therapeutics.

The prominent doctor, who has also provided significant expert commentary on Fox News, NewsMax, and Real America,  told LifeSiteNews’ editor-in-chief John-Henry Westen in August 2021 that “the vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and injury and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.”

On October 7, Twitter suspended McCullough’s account as the cardiologist explained in an announcement on the Gab platform: “With no warning they stripped all my followers to zero, then they executed their kill machine–SUSPENDED!” he wrote.

n addition, McCullough recently described COVID-19 as a “biological weapon.” “It was a government operation that created SARS-CoV-2 and the spike protein,” McCullough declared. “It’s the U.S. government that did it. And they were working on the threat and working on the response … This was all planned … SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon.”

Furthermore, during a late October conference, the internist explained why the experimental COVID-19 gene-based injections should be the presumed cause of unusually high excess death rates around the world.

He added in a later interview that “the vaccine accelerates death from other causes. So, if someone has cancer, the vaccine accelerates that. If someone has heart disease, one is more likely to have fatal heart attacks and strokes… The vaccines cause blood clotting… The vaccine is incredibly risky, and basically, it’s achieving its goal. If the goal was to reduce the world’s population, it’s working.” (Dr. Peter McCullough is being systematically canceled for his resistance to the COVID jabs)

Dr. McCullough has been in the forefront of the fight to treat those suffering from the virus with the proper protocols that are suitable to each patient’s condition and medical ¸Yes, the goal has been and continues to be the reduction of the world’s population, which has been the goal of British eugenicists in the late Nineteenth Century and that of Margaret Sanger and the population controllers that have followed her in the past century. Contraception, the surgical execution of the innocent preborn, euthanasia, suicide, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, “brain death”/human organ vivisection, the starvation and dehydration of innocent human beings, and the whole “quality of life” standard of global “health care” have always been about reducing the world’s population, a goal that has been a paramount one for the ideologues obsessing about “global climate control.” As noted earlier in this commentary, the modern pantheists are now out in the open and have begun to advocate for human extinction, something that the likes of Drs. Peter Singer and Paul Ehrlich only approached obliquely by means of their ceaseless work against God’s command to Adam and Eve to “multiply and increase” so that He could have adorers here on here as members of the Church Militant and in Heaven thereafter as members of the Church Triumphant.

In the meantime, however, it is enough for the vaccinators and the globalist master class to do what they can to sicken, sterilize and eliminate as many people as possible, and to mock divine omnipotence by using a global vaccine passport to fight a virus that is not fatal to those without preexisting comorbidities but is really designed to suppress dissent by denying access to those of us who refuse to obey them, our self-anointed master class of high priests and priestesses:

As noted by former U.S. Rep. Dr. Ron Paul in the video above, World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab and other globalist leaders substitute truth with their own opinions. They decide what’s right and wrong; they decide what’s right for everyone. They dictate what’s “true” on any given day.

Anyone who disagrees with them is an “enemy of the state” — they being “the state” or, more accurately, the Deep State, the hidden power behind the apparent power of official government. Who are the members of this cabal? There’s no official membership list, but over time many of the individual players have become discernible.

The globalist cabal includes but is not limited to government heads, bankers and members of nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s) and liberal think tanks around the world.

One way in which the cabal hides its undemocratic influence is by having its members in dozens of different organizations. When several organizations agree on an issue, it makes it appear as though there’s a majority view, a consensus. But in reality, it’s the same small group of individuals asserting their agenda.

G20 Green-Light International Vaccine Passports

The G20, a group of 19 nations — including the U.S. — plus the European Union, recently held their annual business meeting (B20) in Bali, Indonesia, where they declared that digital vaccine passports, standardized by the World Health Organization, will be part of international pandemic prevention and response moving forward.1

Part of the policy declaration3 reads:4

“We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.”

The rule for standardized international vaccine passports will reportedly be introduced as a revision to the international health regulations during the next World Health Assembly in Geneva.5

What this means is that when the next pandemic is declared, only those who have this digital health certificate will be allowed to move about freely and travel internationally. And, of course, only those who have been appropriately tested and/or vaccinated will have a valid passport.

In addition to adopting an international digital vaccine passport, the G20 recommendations also include the creation of guidelines for a globally coordinated response to crises, “enhanced by a technology-enabled ‘always-on’ global health infrastructure,” and a mutual recognition of COVID-19 vaccines made by G20 members.

Schwab Tells Us What the G20 Are All About

Aside from key government leaders, high-profile globalists such as Schwab were also in attendance at the G20 meetings. In his B20 keynote address, Schwab highlighted the cabal’s agenda and goals:6

“What we have to confront is a deep, systemic and structural re-structuring of our world … [The] world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.”

Part of that worldwide restructuring of society that the WEF, the G20 and many other organizations are working in lockstep to achieve is the implementation of a global vaccine passport, which all of the G20 members have now agreed to. In the case of the U.S., President Biden signed the declaration despite the promises made by his White House COVID-19 Response Team leader, Jeff Zients, who in April 2021 stated:7

“Let me be clear that the government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a credential. There’ll be no federal vaccination database, no federal mandate requiring everyone to obtain a single vaccination credential.”

Basis for Vaccine Passports No Longer Exist

If you’re a rational person, you’re probably thinking, “But wait, the COVID jabs don’t prevent infection or spread, so there’s no basis for vaccine passports anymore.” Indeed, this fact has now been established many times over. This alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that COVID vaccine passports have nothing to do with public health or safety.

An international vaccine passport is the gateway to complete totalitarian control, because the entire control grid around a person gets tied together by it.

Their purpose is not to prevent or contain pandemics. They’re a control mechanism,8 and a really important one. Vaccine passports are THE gateway to complete, totalitarian control of the populations of the world. The globalist cabal desperately needs everyone to have this passport, because the entire control grid around a person gets tied together by it. This is why fighting for informed consent is so crucial.

But how is the G20 getting around the obvious fact that the COVID passports are useless for their stated purpose? They ignore it, and instead stress that everyone also needs a digital identity, and this digital COVID certificate does both.

Outside their own circle, this rationale makes no sense whatsoever, but as noted by Dutch legal philosopher Eva Vlaardingerbroek, the fact that vaccine passports are sold based on a fraudulent premise is now “so obvious that they’ve thrown logic out the window.”9

Their decisions make no sense, and they have no intention of making them sensible. They’re banking on being able to entrap us in their control system, at which point they’ll be able to tell you the moon is made of cheese and you’ll have no way of correcting them without losing everything.

Digital Identity Is Total Surveillance to Control You

As reported by Sociable:10

“In August, 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a 99-page guide book11 on the implementation of digital documentation of COVID-19 certificates, aka vaccine passports, stating that ‘a health pass based solely on individual vaccination status may increase the risk of disease spread.’

This is because the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ were never proven to prevent transmission nor infection, and it recently came to light in the European Parliament that Pfizer never even tested its product for stopping transmission. Despite this knowledge being publicly available, the B20 is still recommending proof of vaccination as a means to travel …

Vaccine passports, by their very nature, serve as a form of digital identity, according to the World Economic Forum (WEF). A digital identity encompasses everything that makes you unique in the digital realm, and it is a system that can consolidate all of your most personal intimate data, including which websites you visit, your online purchases, health records, financial accounts, and who you’re friends with on social media …

[D]igital identity schemes can give governments and corporations the power to incentivize, coerce, or otherwise manipulate human behavior under a system of social credit. Digital identities can be used to determine what products, services, and information are available to us, and they can certainly be used by public and private entities to deny us that access.”

In March 2021, Naomi Wolf, author of “The End Of America,” warned that accepting digital ID will be the end of all freedom:13,14

“I cannot say this forcefully enough: This is literally the end of human liberty in the West if this plan unfolds as planned … Vaccine passports sound like a fine thing if you don’t know what those platforms can do.

I’m CEO of a tech company, I understand what this platform does. It’s not about the vaccine, it’s not about the virus, it’s about data. And once this rolls out you don’t have a choice about being part of the system. What people have to understand is that any other functionality can be loaded onto that platform with no problem at all.”

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver has also issued a warning, saying:15

Vaccine Passports Are Gateway for Complete Financial Control

When vaccine passports first became a topic of international discussions, many of us saw the writing on the wall and warned that such an implementation would become a tool for complete financial and physical control, and would automatically eliminate basic human rights and freedoms.

At the time, we were labeled crazy conspiracy theorists, but it didn’t take long before our worst fears were confirmed. Your vaccine passport will be your digital identity (as confirmed by the WEF), and to that digital identity they plan to add a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC) and a social credit score. These plans are not a conspiracy theory. They’re out in the open.

When you add all of those ingredients together — vaccine requirements for maintaining a valid passport, a digital identity, a social credit score and programmable CBDCs — you end up with a control grid that will eliminate your freedom to live life according to your own desires.

Even your diet can then be dictated by these megalomaniacs. They’re hell-bent on eliminating your ability to eat meat, for example. The whole world, especially the Western world, must transition to insect protein, they say. Meanwhile, you will not find meal worms and crickets on the menus at their globalist gatherings.16 No, insect protein is for the expendables.

COVID Is Used as a Path to Global Financial Surveillance

Once vaccine passports/digital identity and CBDCs are in place, the global cabal will be able to control your physical movements, behaviors and purchases based on how well you conform to their ideals, no matter how irrational, immoral, unethical, unfair or dangerous those may be. As reported by The Daily Sceptic:17

“It’s seemed evident for a while that the current fiat monetary system is, at best, unstable. At worst, it’s a Ponzi scheme whose time has expired. If that’s the case, I suspect the central bankers and 0.1% know this and might be prepared to usher in the new system before the old one collapses on itself — even as they loot it on the way down with the most significant wealth transfer in human history.

To anyone who pays attention to these trends, it seems evident that Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) will be that new system. Every indication is that CBDC’s arrival is imminent. [November 15, 2022], several global banks announced a partnership with the New York Federal Reserve to pilot digital dollars18,19 …

From my vantage point, it’s impossible to overstate the risk presented by CBDC. Whether it’s a utopian vision based on good intentions or a sinister plot to crush our sovereignty, the result may be the same: control. A Central Bank Digital Currency has all the downsides of fiat money, plus the added layers of surveillance and programmability overseen by the state.

So many people on Team Reality have likely felt like dissidents over the last few years simply for challenging anything beyond the herd mentality … Imagine a monetary system with features baked-in to socially engineer how we live. For example:

•Health: ‘You didn’t take your booster … you’re not allowed in public spaces.’

•Energy: ‘You used your energy allotment this month … your electric car won’t start.’

•Food: ‘You ate too much meat this week … your money is only good for plants (or bugs).’

•Savings: ‘If you don’t take your rations soon … your money will expire at the end of the month.’

•Free Speech: ‘You shared info that we disagree with … our algorithm is fining you.’ (PayPal has already started doing this) …

As we saw with the lockdowns, China is the model emulated in the west. Like the creep towards health-related authoritarian measures, unelected globalists with financial interests lurk in the background …

If you have yet to notice, a primary theme of the last three-plus years (at least) is ‘freedom vs. control’, so it’s not hyperbole to suggest that the future must be decentralized if we want to ensure our children grow up in a free world.”

If there’s a silver lining in all of this, it’s that the globalist cabal — the “deep state” that pulls the strings of governments around the world, the hidden power that is making decisions that are devastating for the entire world — overplayed their hand during COVID, exposing their heinous ideologies and plans for all the world to see. As noted by Maajid Nawaz in an interview this past summer (video above):

“When dogma defines your behavior you’re no longer looking at reality … so you’re going to be less pragmatic … That leaves serious blind spots. You end up not seeing reality for what it is, and that is why they ended up overplaying their hand. They’re not looking to reality, they’re looking to their dream, their ideal, which is actually a nightmare.

One great thing that happened during COVID is they overplayed their hand. They exposed themselves … There’s now very little doubt, among those who have heard of the World Economic Forum, that it’s attempting to influence how we do government and politics …

Why do we have an unelected bureaucrat, and a foreign one at that, telling us how to live our lives …? It doesn’t make sense. But then we go further. Why do they all seem to be beholden to this unelected foreign bureaucrat? Why do they all appear to be doing this man’s bidding? … Why can’t they just say no?”

As noted by Nawaz, the government leaders who are not saying no to Schwab for some reason cannot say no, likely because they’ve been compromised. Compromising and blackmailing officials on behalf of the globalist cabal was Jeffrey Epstein’s specialty, and there’s no reason to assume their secrets died with him.

Those with cleaner records may have been threatened into compliance. I would add a third possibility, and that is that they’re in on it because they share the globalists ideals, which include not only top-down authoritarianism but also transhumanism and eugenics. A fourth possibility is self-preservation. They may simply want to secure their own position within the ruling echelon in the new world of “have it alls” and “have nothings.”

We Now Know What They’re Capable Of

Whatever the incentive, the problem they now all face is the fact that they’ve prematurely exposed themselves and their plans. They’ve also exposed how far they’re willing to go. For example, we know they’re willing to seize your bank account and close down your ability to transact over something as minor as making a donation to a cause they don’t like or posting “wrong”-think on social media — and that’s without the benefit of CBDCs!

So, they’ve already shown us what they WILL do once CBDCs are in place. The only difference is that penalties can then be automated. Is this a world you want to live in? Is this what you want for your children and grandchildren? If not, it’s your duty to be the resistance.

Adults today are the last generation that will be able to prevent this global tyranny. If we do nothing, our children will be ensconced in a digital prison they won’t be able to break free from. So, we cannot leave it to them. It’s up to us. So, when CBDCs are rolled out, we must reject them, no matter how inconvenient that might be. When vaccine passports are rolled out, we must reject them, despite the limitations that might bring.

In 2021, countless people were coerced into taking the jabs because they wanted to travel, fearing travel bans for the unvaccinated would be permanent. Well, they weren’t, because enough people pushed back.

We may have to endure limitations if we refuse the coming international vaccine passport, but if enough people around the world refuse, the system won’t work, and those limitations will prove to be temporary. The only way any of the globalists’ plans can become permanent is if we do as we’re told and go along with them. (G20 Signs Declaration for International Vaccine Passport.)

This is all very useful information about the horrific plans that are being made to subject us to the whims of mere mortals who have no concept of either supernatural or natural truth after having made themselves masters of the universe. The most we can do in merely human terms is to refuse to do what these masters of the universe tell us to do as we resist any and all temptations to live as complacent dupes who are expected to surrender their own legitimate liberties to smug elitists who never live by the rules the impose upon the rest of us mortal souls.

Additionally, there are signs that the cabalistic schemes that have been used to manipulate voters, suppress actual truth as it is labeled as “misinformation” to be censored on “social media” will be exposed more and more over time by Elon Musk, who is not a friend of supernatural truth by any stretch of the imagination, now that he has taken over something called “Twitter.”

Apart from releasing some of the company’s internal emails concerning how the 2020 New York Post story about the contents of Hunter Biden’slaptop computer’s hard drive that show he was collecting millions of dollars from Red Chinese and Ukrainian oligarchs with ten percent held in reserve for the “Big Guy” (Don Cordileone Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.), Musk has also discontinued Twitter’s ban on “Covid-19 misinformation.” I remain a cynic about how much the public truly cares about the Hunter Biden stories or about social media’s effort to suppress the truth about the injuries and deaths caused by the vaccines. However, there are surely some people who will come to see the truth about both of these stories and have their eyes opened.

However, we are called to see everything in the world through the supernatural eyes of the Holy Faith as we remember that Catholicism and Catholicism alone is the only bulwark against the evils of our treacherous times. One cannot fight naturalism with naturalism. One can only fight and defeat naturalism with Catholicism, especially by means of a tender reliance upon the Mother of God through her Most Holy Rosary.

IV. Concluding Remarks: To Remember That God Alone is Omnipotent and He Alone Will Put an End to the Madness of the Moment in His Good Time

As Catholics, though, we must always remember that God is still God, that He is permitting these events to unfold within His Divine Providence for His own greater honor and glory and for our own sanctification salvation. Christ the King will permit His enemies and the enemies of Holy Mother Church’s children to go only so far before He intervenes, and, although things look bleak in merely human terms, we must remember that it is because of the prayers and loving protection of Our Lady that our situation is not worse than it is and that more people have not been killed or injured by the globalists and their stooges in the medical industry and Big Pharma, who are simple more refined and seemingly “cultured” versions of the caricature named Jack Kevorkian (see Meeting God In The Face After Playing Him In Life.)

Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ will never ask us to bear any cross that is beyond our capacity to carry and then to embrace in a spirit of loving generosity. He sends us all the graces necessary through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is Mediatrix of All Graces to prosper under our own individual crosses and those we carry collectively in the midst of the conspiracy of dark forces to be found within the mutually symbiotic relationship that exists between the lords of Modernity in the world and the lords of Modernism within the counterfeit church of conciliarism, which has been headed for nearly one hundred nineteen excruciatingly long months by Jorge Mario Bergoglio, aka the Argentine Apostate.

We must remember that we are sinners who are in constant need of making reparation for our sins as the consecrated slave of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. Every sickness, every bit of pain, every bit of misunderstanding, ostracism, ridicule, and material sacrifice is all meant to give honor and glory to the Most Blessed Trinity as we surrender whatever merit that we might earn by enduring an infinitesimally minute amount of the humiliation and pain that our own sins imposed upon Our Lord’s Sacred Humanity during His fearful Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday.

Our Lord’s Bloody Sacrifice of Himself His Co-Equal, Co-Eternal, Co-Divine God the Father in atonement for our sins on the wood of the Holy Cross, which is re-presented or perpetuated in an unbloody manner every day by our true bishops and priests on altars of sacrifice, makes it possible for us to co-redeemers with Him in the work of the sanctification and salvation of the world. This is the time in which God has ordained from all eternity for us to live, meaning that there is work for us to accomplish, work in behalf of the Sacred Deposit of the Holy Faith and also in behalf truth on the merely natural level as serve the Chief Priest and Victim of every Holy Mass, Christ the King, and not the chief priests and priestesses of Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Medicine, Faux Science, Deep State, Globalism and Modernism.

This season of Advent is a season of hope. We must never also pray to Our Lady, our Seat of Wisdom, every day for an increase in the Supernatural Virtue of Hope within our immortal souls so that we do not fall into a morass of bitterness or hopelessness in these perilous time, and Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., highlighted the hopeful nature of Advent in his reflection on the Second Sunday of Advent:

The Office of this Sunday is filled, from beginning to end, with the sentiments of hope and joy, with which the soul should be animated at the glad tidings of the speedy coming of Him who is her Savior and Spouse. The interior coming, that which is effected in the soul, is the almost exclusive object of the Church’s prayers for this day: let us therefore open our hearts, let us prepare our lamps, and wait in gladness that cry which will be heard in the midnight: Glory be to God! Peace unto men!

The Roman Church makes the Station today in the Basilica of Holy Cross-in-Jerusalem. It was in this venerable church that Constantine deposited a large piece of the True Cross, together with the Title which was fastened to it by Pilate’s order, and which proclaimed the Kingly character of the Savior of the world. These precious relics are still kept there; and, thus enriched with such a treasure, the Basilica of Holy Cross in Jerusalem is looked upon, in the Roman Liturgy, as Jerusalem itself, as is evident from the allusions made in the several Masses of the Stations held in that Basilica. In the language of the sacred Scriptures and of the Church, Jerusalem is the image of the faithful soul; and the Office and Mass of this Sunday have been drawn up on this idea, as the one of the day. We regret not to be able here to develop the sublime beauty of this figure; and must proceed at once to the passage which the Church has selected from the Prophet Isaias. There she tells her children how well-founded are her hopes in the merciful and peaceful reign of the Messias. But first let us adore this divine Messias:

And there shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a flower shall rise up out of his root. And the spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him: the spirit of wisdom, and of understanding, the spirit of counsel, and of fortitude, the spirit of knowledge, and of godliness. And he shall be filled with the spirit of the fear of the Lord. He shall not judge according to the sight of the eyes, nor reprove according to the hearing of the ears. But he shall judge the poor with justice, and shall reprove with equity for the meek of the earth: land he shall strike the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips he shall slay the wicked. And justice shall be the girdle of his loins: and faith the girdle of his reins. The wolf shall dwell with the lamb: and the leopard shall lie down with the kid: the calf and the lion, and the sheep shall abide together, and a little child shall lead them. The calf and the bear shall feed: their young ones shall rest together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp: and the weaned child shall thrust his hand into the den of the basilisk. They shall not hurt, nor shall they kill in all my holy mountain, for the earth is filled with the knowledge of the Lord, as the covering waters of the sea. In that day the root of Jesse, who standeth for an ensign of the people, him the Gentiles shall beseech, and his sepulchre shall be glorious. (Isaias 11.)

How much is contained in these magnificent words of the Prophet! The Branch; the Flower that is to come from it; the Spirit which rests on this flower; the seven Gifts of this Spirit; peace and confidence established on the earth; and, throughout the world, one brotherhood in the kingdom of the Messias! St. Jerome, whose words are read by the Church in the lessons of the Second Nocturn of this Sunday, says:”That the Branch which cometh forth from the root of Jesse, is the Blessed Virgin Mary, who had contact with no shrub or plant; and that the Flower is the Lord Jesus, who says in the Canticle of Canticles: I am the Flower of the field, and the Lily of the valley.” In every age of the Christian Church, this wonderful Branch and its divine Flower have been objects of enthusiastic veneration. In the Middle Ages, the Tree of Jesse, with its prophetic branches, was carved on the cathedral porches, was painted on the windows, was embroidered on the hangings of the sanctuary, and the melodious voice of the priests sang its praises in the beautiful Responsory composed by Fulbert of Chartres, and put to music by the devout King Robert.

R. The root of Jesse gave out a Branch, and the Branch a Flower; * and on the Flower resteth the Holy Spirit.

V. The Virgin Mother of God is the Branch, her Son the flower. * And on the flower resteth the holy Spirit.

The devout St. Bernard, commenting upon this responsory in his second Advent homily, says: “The Virgin’s Son is the flower, a flower white and ruddy, chosen out of thousands; a flower on whom the angels love to look; a flower whose fragrance restores the dead; a flower, as himself assures us, of the field, not of a garden: for the flowers of the field bloom without man’s care, no man has sown their seed, no man has cultivated them. Just so the Virgin’s womb, a meadow verdant in an endless spring, has brought forth a flower, whose beauty will never droop, whose freshness will never fade. O Virgin, branch sublime, to what a height art thou grown! Even up to Him that sitteth on the throne, even to the Lord of majesty. It was sure to be so, for thou castest deep down the roots of humility. O plant of heaven indeed! precious above all, holier than all. O tree of life indeed! alone worthy to bear the fruit of salvation.”

And of the holy Spirit and His gifts, what shall we say? They rest and are poured out on the Messias only to the end that they may flow from Him upon us. He needs them not; but we alone need wisdom and understanding, counsel and fortitude, knowledge and godliness, and fear of the Lord. Let us ask with instance for this divine Spirit, by whose operation Jesus was conceived and born in Mary’s womb, and let us beg of him to form Jesus within our hearts. But let us not forget to rejoice ad those other glorious things which are told us by the prophet of the happiness, and peace, and delights, which are to be on the holy mountain. The world has been looking so many ages for peace; it is now coming. Sin had caused enmity and division everywhere; grace will bring unity. A little Child will be the pledge of an alliance between all nations. The prophets have foretold it, the sibyl has announced it, and in Rome itself, buried as it is in paganism, the prince of Latin poets has sung the celebrated poem, which, after all, is but the voice of the old tradition: “The last age foretold by the Cumean Sibyl, is at hand; a new race is being sent down to earth from high heaven. The flock shall no more fear the fierce lions. The serpent shall be no more; the treacherous plant, which yielded poison, shall grow no more.”

Come, then, O Messias, and restore to the world its primitive peace; but remember, we beseech Thee, that it is in the heart of man that harmony has been broken more than elsewhere in Thy creation: cure this heart, enter into possession of this Jerusalem, which Thou lovest, though so unworthy: she has been too long captive in Babylon; lead her out of this strange land. Build up her temple again, and make the glory of this second temple to be greater than that of the first, by having Thee to dwell in it, not in figure, but in the reality of Thy adorable Person. The angel said to Mary: “The Lord God shall give unto thy Son the throne of David his father; and he shall reign in the house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.” What can we do, O Jesus, but say with Thy beloved disciple, at the close of his prophecy: Amen. Come, Lord Jesus! (Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., The Liturgical Year, Second Sunday of Advent.)

Our Lord will come in His good time to judge the living and the dead on the Last Day.

However, He comes down to us every day when a true Holy Mass is offered by a true priest, and His Real Presence in the Most Blessed Sacrament abides with us even when the only thing a Catholic might be able to do when that Real Presence cannot be found in the churches that are help captive to the sacramental barrenness of conciliarism’s invalid liturgical rites is to make a Spiritual Communion. Our Lord is here. He abides among us yet, and as yet He remains a stumbling block even to make who understand truth on the natural level but who are baffled as to why it is necessary to proclaim its Lord, Christ the King, in its defense.

Pope Saint Gregory the Great, though, explained that we must proclaim Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus as He has revealed Himself us  to us through His true Church even though remains a stumbling block to the Jews and a scandal to the Gentiles, which in today’s contexts are those who may have some inchoate sense of the supernatural but are otherwise immersed in the merely natural and who do not want to risk more than the considerable they have already in natural terms for fear of being considered a “religious fanatic”:

The sight of so many signs and so many mighty works should have been a source of wonder, and not a stumbling-block. And yet the unfaithful Jer. xxxi. 5. found these very works a rock of offence, when they afterwards saw Him Who had worked so many miracles dying on the Cross. Hence Paul saith: “We preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling-block and unto the Gentiles foolishness.” 1 Cor. i. 23. It is indeed folly in the eyes of men to say that the Author of life died for men and thus men put as a stumbling-block to hinder them from coming to Jesus, the very thing that doth oblige them the most unto Him. For the more humbling God hath undergone for man’s sake, the more worthy is He that man should worship Him.

And blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in Me. Now what is this, but a plain mention of that time, when He afterwards humbled Himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the Cross? It is as if He said: I indeed do wonderful works, but the day will come when I shall not refuse to suffer shame and evil treatment. Take heed then, ye who now worship Me for the works’ sake, that when I come to die ye despise Me not for My death’s sake.

And, as the disciples of John departed, what did Jesus say unto the multitudes concerning this same John? Let us hear. What went ye out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken with the wind? Here our Lord teacheth not by assertion, but by negation. Now a reed is a thing so made that as soon as the wind bloweth upon it, it bendeth it over toward the opposite quarter. And the fleshly-minded man is like a human reed. As he is praised or blamed so he bendeth himself in the one direction or the other. (Pope Saint Gregory the Great, Matins, Second Sunday of Advent.)

We must remember that sin is more deadly any virus, including the coronavirus, and a nation where most people are immersed in worldliness, impurity, immodesty and indecency, defy the Sovereignty of God over the sanctity and fecundity of marriage as represented by contraception (whether direct or by “natural” means), blaspheme freely and look to mans merely natural to “solve” problems that have Original Sin as their remote cause and our own Actual Sins as their proximate causes will a nation that will continue to experience chastisements until enough people are converted to the true Catholic Faith and then seek to grow in virtue and sanctity with the help of Our Lady’s graces.

We know the end of the story about all this, don’t we?

Of course, we do.

Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart will triumph in the end, and every Rosary we pray helps to plant the seeds for this triumph.

What are we waiting for?

Isn’t it time to pray a Rosary now?

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Peter Chrysologus, pray for us,

Saint Barbara, pray for us.

Saint Sabbas, pray for us.

Support Christ or Chaos

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment