GUARD YOUR CHURCH BUILDING – THE WORST IS YET TO COME!!!

Abortion Activists Vandalize Mississippi Church as Pro-Abortion Violence Continues Nationwide

State  |  Micaiah Bilger  |   May 26, 2022   |   10:08AM   |  Jackson, Mississippi

https://www.facebook.com/v2.5/plugins/share_button.php?app_id=&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df37f26f6ad6fd32%26domain%3Dwww.lifenews.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.lifenews.com%252Ffb18456e9486f4%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=67&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifenews.com%2F2022%2F05%2F26%2Fabortion-activists-vandalize-mississippi-church-as-pro-abortion-violence-continues-nationwide%2F&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&type=box_count2

A rural Mississippi church was vandalized with pro-abortion graffiti Monday, the latest in dozens of attacks against churches and pro-life organizations in recent weeks.

The walls, doors and windows of Mt. Avery Missionary Baptist Church in Columbus, near the Alabama border, were found covered with pro-abortion slogans and what appears to be a drawing of a sexual assault, WCBI News reports.

St. Elmore Armistad, a deacon at the church, said someone noticed the graffiti Monday afternoon and called him, according to the Associated Press.

“Why us? That’s the first thing I wondered,” Armistad said. “You hear about things like that happening other places, but you don’t get a grip on it until it happens to you.”

Photos taken by the local news show phrases like “Keep your laws off my body,” “Girls just want to have fundamental human rights” and comments about sexual assault painted all over the building.

SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to fight abortion, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NlbnNpdGl2ZV9tZWRpYV9pbnRlcnN0aXRpYWxfMTM5NjMiOnsiYnVja2V0IjoiaW50ZXJzdGl0aWFsIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH0sInRmd190d2VldF9yZXN1bHRfbWlncmF0aW9uXzEzOTc5Ijp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6InR3ZWV0X3Jlc3VsdCIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9fQ%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1529134939559567361&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifenews.com%2F2022%2F05%2F26%2Fabortion-activists-vandalize-mississippi-church-as-pro-abortion-violence-continues-nationwide%2F&sessionId=b6fa3f37f23e0e24dd86dca263748d5df0ec3b8f&theme=light&widgetsVersion=c8fe9736dd6fb%3A1649830956492&width=550px

Armistad said the congregation is poor, older and African American, and just a handful of people attend every week.

“Everybody is on disability that’s here,” he told the local news. “Except for some young ones that attend sometimes. You know how young people don’t attend church anymore.”

Lowndes County Sheriff Eddie Hawkins is investigating, but the church is located in such a rural area off a small country road that he said it will be difficult to find witnesses, according to the reports.

Hawkins and Armistad said they suspect the vandals chose to target the church because they would not get caught. Armistad said he does not know what other reason there could be, because the congregation is not political.

“We don’t preach abortion,” he said. “We preach Jesus Christ. It just don’t add up.”

Four other churches also were vandalized with pro-abortion graffiti this week in Washington state, and dozens of attacks on pro-life and Christian groups have occurred since news broke earlier this month about a leaked draft U.S. Supreme Court ruling that shows the justices overturning Roe v. Wade through the Mississippi case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health.

Even prominent pro-abortion groups are using words that hint at possible insurrection and violence. Earlier this month, Rachel O’Leary Carmona, executive director of Women’s March, warned that abortion activists will be “ungovernable” until the government legalizes abortion on demand.

Other pro-abortion groups have been calling for churches to be the target of abortion activists’ outrage. And one group posted the addresses of the Supreme Court justices online to urge people to protest outside their homes.

The Supreme Court has not issued a final ruling on the abortion case yet, but the Department of Homeland Security released a report last week warning that radical abortion activists plan to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their law clerks if the court overturns Roe v. Wade. The report indicates these pro-abortion extremists also plan to target churches and other places of worship with violence and vandalism.

LifeNews has been keeping track of reports of pro-abortion vandalism, violence, threats and other incidents since the leak. They include:

Oregon – Pro-Life Billboard Vandalized in Portland: “Abort the Supreme Court” (Andy Ngo)

Washington state – Four Churches Vandalized by Pro-Abortion Radicals in Olympia (more from Center for Security Policy)

Alabama – Vicar, Parishioners Respond to Vandalism at Pro-Life Women’s Clinic in Auburn (Opelika-Auburn News)

Kansas – Supports of Pro-Life “Value The Both” Amendment Report Yard Signs Stolen (KAKE)

Arizona – Planned Parenthood Chair Brags How Her Husband Assaulted Man in “Blacks for Trump” Shirt

USA – Abortion Activists Threaten to Burn Down Supreme Court, Kill Justices When Roe is Overturned (more at CBS News)

Arizona – Watch: Pro-Abortion Demonstrators Attack, Spit on ‘Students for Kari’ Volunteers (College Fix)

Missouri – Pro-life Student Group at University of Missouri Calls for Dialogue after its Memorial Was Vandalized (Campus Reform)

Indiana – Pro-Life Student Advocates Shoved, Grabbed from Behind at Pro-Abortion Rally (Students for Life)

Idaho – Two Arrested at Pro-Abortion Rally, Protester Allegedly Kicked Police Officer (KTVB 7)

Maryland – Birthright of Frederick Vandalized: “F— Fake Clinics”

Maryland – Alpha Pregnancy Center in Reisterstown Vandalized with Pro-Abortion Graffiti (Andy Ngo) (more at WBAL-TV 11)

USA – Video: Pro-Life Student Activists Kicked, Shoved by Pro-Abortion Protesters (Students for Life)

Michigan – Michigan Catholic Church Vandalized with Satanic Symbols after Roe Leak (more at The Tennessee Star)

New York City – Abortion Activists Threaten to Bomb, Burn Down St. Patrick’s Catholic Church

Maine – Republican Senator Receives Threats after Voting No on Radical Pro-Abortion Bill (Boston Globe)

Texas – Another Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Vandalized in Denton (NRL News)

Virginia – Pro-Life Organization Office Vandalized; Man Exposes Himself, Urinates on Front Door (Concerned Women for America)

Washington, D.C. – Justice Alito and His Family Taken to Secure Location to Protect Them From Pro-Abortion Violence

Colorado – Parish church in Fort Collins tagged with pro-abortion graffiti; police investigating (Catholic News Agency)

Oregon – Oregon Right to Life Firebombed With Molotov Cocktail

Texas – Catholic Churches Vandalized with Pro-Abortion Graffiti

Virginia – Pregnancy Center Vandalized with Pro-Abortion Graffiti in Northern Virginia (National Review) (more from Human Coalition)

USA – Pro-Abortion Feminist Calls for Violence against Pro-Life Americans, Celebrates Arson

Wisconsin – Abortion Activists Light Fire in Pro-Life Group’s Office, Throw Molotov Cocktails

Texas – Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Vandalized in Denton, Texas (more from Students for Life)

Oregon, Maryland – Radical Abortion Activists Vandalize Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers That Help Pregnant Women

Washington, D.C. – Two Pro-Life Leaders Say Abortion Activists Punched Them at D.C. Protest (Stand True)

Texas – Pro-Abortion Group Brags about Vandalizing Trotter House Pregnancy Center in Austin (Stop the Sweeps ATX) (more at Pregnancy Help News)

Texas – Pro-Life University of North Texas Student Says Antifa Vandalized Door, Issued Threats (Fox News)

Washington state – Antifa Assault News Crew during Pro-Abortion Rally in Seattle (Andy Ngo)

Colorado – Catholic Church in Boulder Defiled Following Roe v. Wade Draft Opinion Leak (Denver Gazette)

Oregon – Pro-Abortion Protesters Damage Property In Portland Following SCOTUS Leak On Abortion (KXL 101 FM News) (more at KOIN 6)

California – Two Police Officers Injured at Pro-Abortion Protest in Los Angeles (more at CBS News)

https://www.facebook.com/v2.5/plugins/share_button.php?app_id=&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df2146b267c6352c%26domain%3Dwww.lifenews.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.lifenews.com%252Ffb18456e9486f4%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=67&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifenews.com%2F2022%2F05%2F26%2Fabortion-activists-vandalize-mississippi-church-as-pro-abortion-violence-continues-nationwide%2F&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&type=box_count

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CONFUSED ABOUT THE VATICAN AND PEKING?


This is an absolute ……..MUST SEE!!!!!

TCE 44: Liz Yore and the Catholic Church in China 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgQ4rM1txbk   90 MINS

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video TCE 44: Liz Yore and the Catholic Church in China

TCE 44: Liz Yore and the Catholic Church in China

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Some weekend viewing for you!!!

TCE 44: Liz Yore and the Catholic Church in China 

This is an absolute MUST SEE!!!

The underground, brave & faithful Catholics of China should be an inspiration to us all in these times where it is so difficult to express our Christian beliefs without being vilified and persecuted one way or another.

Cardinal Zen tried to meet with Francis and kept saying, ‘If you sign this deal, it will be a sell-out, it will be a suicide pact, it will be a total betrayal’ – Liz Yore and the crushed Catholic Church in China 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgQ4rM1txbk   90 mins

++++++++++++++++++++++

Heroic Cardinal Zen: ‘Martyrdom is normal in our Church’ 

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video TCE 44: Liz Yore and the Catholic Church in China

TCE 44: Liz Yore and the Catholic Church in China

ReplyReply allForward
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

HOMEPAGE > CONVIVIUMINDICE

Enrico Maria Radaelli *
AT THE HEART
OF RATZINGER. 

HE IS THE POPE,
NOT THE OTHER.
The non-Renunciation of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013
it is the direct fruit of “Ratzingerism”, the taught heresy
for fifty years by Pope Joseph Ratzinger
in his Introduction to Christianity.

Illustrated pro manuscriptoAurea Domus editions, in-8°,
Preface by H.E.R. Mgr. René Henry Gracida. 
Milan 2022, pp. 503, € 60,00, introductory offer at € 45,00;
economic shipping included, estimated arrival to the US: 20 days, 
€ 78,00
(You can request it with an E-MAIL to the Author,
payment with Paypal)

* * *

CERCA NEL SITOSito di metafisica e teologia per un progetto culturale cattolicoAurea DomusAurea Domushttps://enricomariaradaelli.it/emr/aureadomus/barra_libri.htmlHOMEPAGE > CONVIVIUM INDICE Enrico Maria Radaelli *
AT THE HEART
OF RATZINGER. 

HE IS THE POPE,
NOT THE OTHER.
The non-Renunciation of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013
it is the direct fruit of “Ratzingerism”, the taught heresy
for fifty years by Pope Joseph Ratzinger
in his Introduction to Christianity.

Illustrated pro manuscriptoAurea Domus editions, in-8°,
Preface by H.E.R. Mgr. René Henry Gracida. 
Milan 2022, pp. 503, € 60,00, introductory offer at € 45,00;
economic shipping included, estimated arrival to the US: 20 days, 
€ 78,00
(You can request it with an E-MAIL to the Author,
payment with Paypal)

* * *

ONE BOOK ALONE AGAINST 
EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE, 
OR ONE BOOK TO SAVE 
EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE ?* * *
FRONT* * *BACK* * *First: a book against Pope Ratzinger or a book to save Pope Ratzinger? 
Breaking the veil with which even the most apparently faithful Pastors of the Church have blinded their eyes for nine years in order to hide the truth, the book I am proposing shows, for the first time in the world, all the very gravely erroneous and articulated doctrine Hegelian taught since 1967 at the University of Tübingen by Prof. Ratzinger, who, climbing the most important steps of the Magisterium to the highest, is revered by all as the most formidable champion of the faith. 
Now, given that de internis non iudicat prætor, objective, public facts are found in the book, given which, see pp. 357-8, with great apprehension Pope Benedict is shown the only way to save himself from the grave danger that would await him if he does not disavow his terrible doctrines.* * *Second: a book against the “Ratzingerians” or to save the “Ratzingerians”? On this basis, for the first time in the world it is shown with the most irrefutable and rigorous evidence that the Renunciation made on 11 February 2013 by Benedict XVI is invalid and null and void, and only because it was elaborated on the basis of the erroneous Hegelian doctrine of which above, which all the Cardinals and Bishops of the Church have supinely accepted, except two, one of whom also wanted to draft the important Preface now placed at the end of the book. However, if these Pastors recognize that the Renunciation is invalid, as demonstrated on pp. LXXVI ff. and on pp. 366-8, the writer here is the first to point out that they too would save themselves from the terrible punishment that awaits those who adhere to erroneous doctrines, always in compliance with the above judicial principle.* * *Third: a book against “Francis” or a book to save “Francis”? From what has been said it follows that “Francis” is in reality an anti-pope, so that what has just been said also applies to him: if he too recognizes that the Conclave which (knowing he is electing an anti-pope: the facts are objective) elected him on the 13th March 2013 is invalid and null, he too will return to obey the Laws of God, as indicated throughout the book, especially on pp. 375-7, thus perhaps saving himself as his modernist accomplices from the punishment reserved for those who betray the Law of God. * * *

TO SHAKE THE CHURCH FROM THE MODERNIST SPELL
       
OF RATZINGERISM TAKES A DIVINE INTERVENTION.
  This book should have been little more than a pedantic and perhaps boring doctrinal critical investigation, and instead it immediately revealed much more than that, because somehow a kind of drama soon took to life in it, almost a Greek tragedy in which all the important doctrinal concepts have as though withdrawn into the background, as if they were just a large scenario, the severe landscape more and more tormented and anguished, in which events take place that have taken more and more life, breaking up in a jolt in a conclusion from page to page more and more pressing, unexpected, and, as will be seen, overwhelming. 

  And this is the point: that this metaphysical essay, wearing the increasingly evident and dramatic garments of a Greek tragedy, turns out to be even more than an invented work, which is precisely a Greek tragedy, showing itself as the crudest and ruthless photograph of a precise fact: that of the Church and the world caught today in their most hasty flight from reality. That is, better: in their most hasty flight from God: from the reality of God. And it is precisely from this detailed and documented discovery that the drama was born: from the merciless photograph of a precise, very current and global event; but, even before that, it is precisely from here that the rigorous, documented and scientific philosophical analysis of those Ratzingerian doctrines from which that drama came to life was born.   

And this is where the book “exploded”. Yes: it really “exploded” into unexpected and very lively images of Angels, Archangels, Cherubs and Serafini, because its almost five hundred pages were suddenly animated by unexpected Celestial Creatures, don’t ask me how, don’t ask why, as if the thousand terrible doctrinal truths unfolded had felt the most imperative need to make everyone see clearly, from the first to the last page, the faces, eyes, mouths and lips of those who were really uttering those terrible and powerful words of indisputable truth, so that, among a hundred clouds torn here and there by darting rays of the sun or by flashes of lightning and lightning, they came to life, among those writings of high metaphysics about a more than justly much loved and universally well appreciated personality, and we are obviously talking about Pope Joseph Ratzinger, dozens of ineffable creatures who somehow made their way between the lines, the drop caps, the references, the headlines, shaking them and violating them. and with no respect for the structural order, now with the most moving, weeping and painful sweetness, now with the most unusual roughness and arrogance, in any case always without having asked anyone’s permission, certainly not me. Result? I wish the readers were to judge him. We could perhaps imagine this strange book with a somewhat four-faced look as if it were not at all shy, but determined, unstoppable and comely last Muse, also released, like all her other sweet sisters, due to the urgency of the Truth to show us that it can reach our hearts not only through the irresistible force of the most reasoned and solid logic, but because it is precisely this Truth, in itself Truth, that is attractive, that is splendid, that is beautiful, that is, that is boundlessly desirable, to be married immediately and forever.Why marry? Because the Truth that lives in Beauty is our Lord Jesus Christ himself, Verbum et Imago Dei, and he is our Spouse, it is He who awaits us from heaven, to make us live forever. Forever, do you understand? Together with him, in the Father’s arms of love. What are we waiting to be convinced?* * *
(Go up)Here, in a nutshell, are the eighteen serious heretical deviations that I believe taught for fifty years by Professor Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, in his Introduction to Christianity, fifteen of which are struck by the Church – and one of them even three times –, in his long history, from the due anàthemes, and which together gives rise to the multi-heresy, never disavowed, indeed at least three times by its Author reiterated, of the “RATZINGERISM”:1), the most springing and initial deviation: adoption of the Kierkegaard-Pascalian fideistic model, for which the metaphysical knowledge of God is impossible (see, in At the heart of Ratzinger, §§ 11-21);

2), the most incisive: subversion of the order of the Persons of the divine Monotriad, that is, not perceived but implemented and systematic inversion of the metaphysical order that will and intellect must have (the will, which proceeds, is made to precede the intellect), thus making the SS. Trinity an arbitrary and dictatorial God as in the erroneous Islamic notion, so as to lose his two most substantial qualities: the reason and the love (throughout the book, especially in §§ 65-6 and 70); anathematized;

3), the most devastating: consequent recourse to the postulates of practical reason: replacement of reasons for believing with the will to believe. Thus theory is replaced with praxis, which however, as we know, is not suitable for reasoning, but rather constitutes its stumbling block that devastates and annihilates it, that is, it is its error (see §§ 11-21) ; anathematized;

4), the most modernist: adoption of the skeptical Fideistic doubt based on knowledge, assuming as a criterion precisely what constitutes the surest vehicle of cognitive uncertainty, placing it in the first place at the basis of the knowledge taught by the Church: supernatural knowledge, or witness, or by faith (§ § 11-6);anathematized;5), the most tragedy: the conviction that God remains “essentially invisible”, even in the beatific vision of Paradise (§ 18);

6),the most antiscientific: the evident if not explicit disavowal of the divine origin of the Bible, for which it would be man who conjectures things about God, and not God who with His Word teaches man what man must know about He and must then do (§§ 64 and 69); anathematized; 

7),the most atheist: to reduce the notions and prophecies of the Holy Scriptures concerning invisible realities such as Hell and devil or miraculous such as the divine and virginal sonship of Jesus Christ to imaginative and semi-pagan mythologisms (in several points, especially in §§ 64-5); anathematized;

8),the most idealistically cause initial: the evident but not explicit disregard of the reality principle, which moreover can only be found in the principle of source “innascence”, or “of in-birth” of God the Father, and, metaphysically speaking, nowhere else (§§ 10 and 25); 

9), the most idealistically consequent: splitting of the Papacy into “Active Papacy” and “Passive Papacy” within a “Synodal Papacy”, in the typical, unreasonable, unrealistic and anti-Catholic idealistic Heg-elian scheme of “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” (§ 22);anathematized;

10), the most Pantheistic-Spinosian: to make thinking coincide in God with creating, with the consequent conviction that therefore the essence of God would be involved in His creation and in human history (§§ 19, 42 and 63; anathematized;

11), the most absurd (but ideologically necessary for the Ratzingerism): connote God as “God of Freedom”, charging Him with two aspects then transmitted, by analogy, to the world created by Him: elusiveness and unpredictability, as in the false notion of God elaborated later by Mohammed, and, nine hundred years later, by Luther, by Calvin and the “enlightenment” atheists of all centuries, including those of today (§§ 24-26); anathematized;

12), the most unlikely antitrinitarian: to introduce in the essence of God, in addition to the concept of Logos, that of Diá-logos, or “Colloquium”, for which the three Persons “dialogue” with each other as with man; the antipope will take the matter to the extreme, arguing that « the three Persons quarrel », because the dialogue of a “God of Freedom” cannot have boundaries (§§ 55-60 and 66); but the essence of God has no motion: in it there is only one, unique, all-en-compassing and eternal “SuperThought”: the Logos; anathematized;

13), THE MOST SERIOUS: rejection and annihilation of the divine, ineffable Redemption as the ‘Holocaust Sacrifice of God the Son, in Jesus Christ, to God the Father’, confirmed in 2016 – in an interview with Jacques Servais s.j. – as a fact « unacceptable by modern man », that is, in reality, by Pope Ratzinger himself (§§ 39-43 and 62-5); anathematized;

14), the most reductive: the belief that Redemption is “the attainment, in Christ ‘Omega’, of the perfect man” with a Teilhardian imprint (§§ 44-7); anathematized;

15), the most devastating: cancellation of original sin, of the concept of sin as an “offense to God”, of Hell, of the devil, of Purgatory, of Heaven, as well as of the final and definitive separation of the “pious people” from the “impious”, because it too is « unacceptable by modern man », that is, always by Ratzinger, also here hidden behind the periphrasis « modern man » (§§ 50-3); anathematized;

      16), the most illogical and depressing: cancellation of the glorious bodies of the blessed in Paradise, including those of Christ and the Virgin (§§ 50-1);     17), the most repulsive: the conviction that « the doctrine of the divinity of Jesus would not be affected if Jesus were born of a human marriage », with all the multiple, serious and heretical consequences that this entails (§ 71); anathematized; and three times;

18), the most ecumenist: the opinion that the Church’s unconsutable tunic, due to the splits caused by the disobedience and rebellions of the heretics, is today « divided into multiple churches » (§ 72); anathematized.* * *CONTENTS.
(Go up)     Foreword of René Henry Gracida………………………………….p. I
First Part.

PREQUEL: ON THE RENUNCIATION
OF POPE BENEDICT XVI.

   1. The reason why we call these pages “Prequel”.………..p. V

   2. Today, Romano Amerio would affirm:
       “Benedict XVI’s Resignation is invalid, 
       null and void. Ratzinger is still the Pope. 
       Bergoglio is an antipope.”
       The reason is the following………………………………………p. VII 

   3.How did we arrive to the present disgraceful situation…..p. X 

   4. What is the good that the Church must always pursue…..p. XII 

   5. The terms of the problem…………………………………………..p. XV

   6. The three notions of Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus 
      Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ according to

      the meaning attributed to them from Magisterium
      of the Church………………………………………………………..p. XVII 
   
   7. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus 
      Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ according to
      the meaning attributed to them since fifty years 
      from Pope Benedict XVI’s – Joseph Ratzinger’s
      in his ancient and never retracted Hegelian ideology…..p. XXII
                                        
  8. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus 
      Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ in the meaning
      attributed to them from Pope Benedict XVI’s in his
      Declaratio of Resignation of February 11, 2013………..p. XXIV 
  
  9. Logical-semantic analysis of the Farewell Speech
      held by Benedict XVI of February 27, 2013…………….p. XXVII 

10. The notions of ‘Bishop emeritus’ end of ‘Pope
      emeritus’ according to the Magisterium of the 
      Church. Do we have here a legislative vacuum
      or only the will to do whatever one wants?
……………p. XXX 

11. First conclusions of the logic-semantic analysis 
      on Benedict XVI’s Declaratio and Farewell Speech…p. XXXV 

12. The arguments of invalidity of Pope 
      Benedict XVI’s Resignation of the Papacy  
      with regard to a juridical-canonical validation. 
      First aspect: is the Resignation invalided
      by external elements?
………………………………………p. XXXVII 

13.The arguments of invalidity of Pope 
      Benedict XVI’s Resignation of the Papacy 
      with regard to a juridical-canonical validation. 
      Second aspect: is the Resignation invalided
      by internal elements?
..……………………………………..p. XL 
    
14CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………..p. XLIV 

15. Finally, there is a reasoning that doesn’t give
alternatives: neither to the Pope, nor to anyone 
      else: the Pope is and remains Benedict XVI.

      The reasoning that we say is called 
      “Disjunctive vel”. There it is.
………………………………p. XLVII

15.A. First reflection, based on the premise ‘p’,  
which says: You are Pope, yes, albeit ‘emeritus’.…p. LI 

15.B. Second reflection, based on the premise ‘q’, 
       as opposed to ‘p’:
 No, You are not Pope
because You has renounced it.…………………………….p. LIV 

Post Scriptum.
Where and how this work is inserted in the vast 
     panorama of the very significant studies
     existing on the topic today on the subject……………..p. LVII

Annotation in the margin of the II par of p. XXVII (*),  
of the II par of p. XLIII (**) 
end IV par of p. XLV (***)…………………………………..p. LXVIII
          
The Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicates  
      Pope Ratzinger (and with him the whole Church).
      And You, Pope Ratzinger, what are You waiting
      for to save Yourself from excommunication
      (and save, with You, the whole Church)?
…………….p. LXVIII

     Is perhaps a universal self-excommunication  
     of the Church possible? Yes, it is possible:  
     isn’t that just what is happening today?
……………..p. LXXVII Second Part.

ON THE TEACHING OF JOSEPH RATZINGER 
IN HIS STUDY INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIANITY.

      Anthology of the eighteen (18!) most serious 
      heresies found in Introduction to Christianity
      never retracted, indeed three times, even recently, 
      by their Author confirmed, fifteen of which (five out 
      of six) already struck by precise anàthemas.…………….p. 373 

   1. Equalities and inequalities…………………………………………..p. 17

   2. Who is the true “Master of doubt” 
       of the super-doubtful Cardinal Archbishop
       Monsignor Carlo Maria Martini ………………………………….p. 19 

  3. First: what is the task of a catholic theologian
      regarding the “Norma normans” of the Faith?
      Second:
 is this task also performed 
      by Prof. Ratzinger?
…………………………………………………..p. 22 

  4. The non-catholic heaven of the Professor from 
      Tübinghen’s book, Introduction to Christianity
      – which by an ideological choice is a historicist, 
      anti-metaphysical and fideistic book – anticipates
      the sky without dogma of today’s antipope “Francis”……..p. 26 

  5. Why an old book of fifty years ago is as important 
      is as few other books in the word……………………………….p. 31 

  6. How to empty the doctrine of Faith from inside. 
      Or from where, how, and through whom the current  
      devastating secularization of the West has been spread……p. 36 
   
  7. Metaphysical methodology and historical methodology:
      that is catholic and anti-catholic, that is, modernist.
      Which one will Prof. Mons. Ratzinger have chosen?………p. 42
                                        
  8. The historicist, anti-metaphysical, anti-scientific, 
      and anti-catholic methodology of the Theologian
      from Tübingen.
…………………………………………………………p. 47 
  
  9. If the exclusion of the correct investigation tools,  
      which are moreover a duty and mandatory,  
      can constitute a method……………………………………………….p. 51 

10. The historicist method is the theologian’s drug. 
      And the Protestant and Lutheran leaders are its pushers…..p. 54 

11. One by one, the Professor’s main statements
      of Tübingen on the problems of doubt of Faith.
………….p. 59

12. The doubt. The only thing of which, 
      for Professor Ratzinger, one must never doubt……………….p. 62

13. You will never insist enough on certainty that God
      wants to instill in us: to be knowable by us. More:
      that His knowledge is by God strongly wanted……………….p. 67 

14. Perfect theoreticality of the reasoning of Faith. 
      Total unreasonableness of any doubt about Faith…………….p. 70
    
15. The crossroads of Ratzingerian thought is not
      Faith, but doubt. And precisely the skeptical doubt.
…..p. 72

16. The Ratzingerian skeptical doubt,
father of the new era of Faith: the ‘Mobilist’ Faith………….p. 74

17. What ever might conclude of good, a reason that
      made it self unable to be, as it should, very certain
      of the truth it knows, one reason, that is, which,  
      by it self, has made it self powerless and incapable 
      of reasoning correctly?……………………………………………….p. 78 

18.Professor Ratzinger has every reason to have such 
      a dramatically skeptical Faith: how does a man have
      a luminous Faith in a God which for him will always 
      be « the essentially Invisible »?…………………………………….p. 81 

19. Here we are, at last it comes to light a doctrine 
      that dangerously approaches Professor Ratzinger
      to nothing less than Baruc Spinoza. And not only………p. 87 

20. Kantius genuit Kierkegaardium, Kierkegardius genuit
autem Coxium, Coxius inde genuit Ratzingerium,
      
Ratzingerius vero genuit Martinum, Martinus denique……p. 92 
  
21. The fideistic skepticism of the Tübingen  
      
Professor is it perhaps subject to some  
      ecclesiastical censorship
?…………………………………………..p. 94 

22. The heretical Ratzingerian concept of the active Papacy
      and the passive Papacy as a direct reflection of the 
      scheme idealistic Hegelian-like of  “believer and 
      non-believer”……………………………………………………………..p. 97  

23. God said: « Look for Me in a horrid region », 
      or not rather: « Do not look for Me 
      in a horrid region »? (Isaiah 45:19; tr. CEI 74.)……………p. 103 

24. To much “relationship”, in the Professor’s theology,
      and no “substance”: “But it’s the anti-metaphysics, 
     my dear. It is from here that the Church 
     has lost the principle of reality.”………………………………….p. 104 

25. The most appropriate definition of the “religious  
philosophy”, as Livi would call it, of the Professor 
Joseph Ratzinger, is: “Ultra-Idealist Philosophy”: 
      “Beyond Idealism”.
…………………………………………………p. 111 

26. If the “God Freedom” conjectured in 1967 in
      Tübingen resembles the notion of God elaborated 
in 610 by Mohammed and that reworked  
in the Sixteenth century by Luther and Calvin.
………..p. 114 

27. What binds and what unties the uncertainties 
of skeptical doubt to the certainties  
      
of the “Common sense” of Mgr. Livi and of Faith…….p. 118 

28. For Professor Ratzinger and Cardinal Martini
      perhaps that Faith is a perpetual wave-like motion?………p. 122 

29. The one professed by Professor Ratzinger and by
      Cardinal Martini is a heretic ‘voluntary doubt’, or is it
      merely ‘an excessive preoccupation with believing’?…….p. 129 

30. From the skeptical doubt of the Professor of Tübingen 
      to « synodal polyhedral » of the antipope “Francis”: 
      total abolition of all truthful certainty, to begin with from
      that of the five certainties of the “Common sense”………..p. 133 
    
31. If it can be said that a Christian “does not have”
      the truth, who does not posses the truth,  
      as the antipope “Francis” says.
………………………………..p. 136 

32. Can’t Popes be judged and censored? In that case are 
      to be judged and censored a Professor and a Cardinal……p. 141 

33. If the heretical palindrome conjectured in 1967 by the
      Professor of Tübingen, confirmed and perfected in 1988
      by a ultra-Cardinal of Milan, finally summarized in 2015
      even by an antipope, it annihilates the whole Church…….p. 144 

34.Thanks to the “Farmer”, we understand the “Prof”; 
      worse: thanks to an antipope we understand the Pope.
      More: thanks to an antipope idolatrous 
      we understand a Pope heretical. That is, how much 
      ultra-extremist 
it is was believed moderate.……………..p. 147 

35. Who is it, for the Tübingen Professor and for the man
      of today, the protagonist on the world scene: 
      is it perhaps God, which, however, don’t be seen, 
      or is it the man, who instead be seen?………………………….p. 151 

36. The real drama – tó dràma – is between Heaven
      and earth, between God and man. 
      But Prof. Ratzinger does not notice it at all………………….p. 156 

37. Since God, provided He exists, provided He speaks,
      He didn’t speak first, who ever did then?…………………….p. 160 

38. And forgiveness too, who brought it into the world?
      God brought it or men brought it?………………………………p. 164 

39. We enter the drama of the Heavens.   
      And of the Heavens of Heavens: the drama 
      of an indignant God the Father, and of His Son  
       – He too God –, to Him in His own sacrificed blood.
      We enter there whereit really does not want
      
to enter, and never is entered, the historicist 
      Professor from Tübingen.………………………………………..p. 168 40. For the Church it is the central “liturgical dogma”.
      For Professor Ratzinger (and future Pope) 
      
it is « a cruel one and unacceptable mechanism ». 
      Who is right?
…………………………………………………………..p. 171 

41. I ask: the millions of Masses celebrated 
      according to the Novus Ordo Missæ 
      of Pope Paul VI, are under anàthema?
…………………….p. 174 

42. In full Soteriology, appears again Spinoza………………….. p. 180 

43. “Lamb of God”: yea, to appease the indignation of God,
      the Lamb can only be of God. 
      But in what sense “of God”?………………………………………p. 18344. Prolegomena to an evolutionary theology: 
      “Cosmic Doubt” plus “Cosmic Evolutionism”, 
      equal to…?
…………………………………………………………….p. 188 

45. Where, how and when was born the transformation  
      of the rocky society founded on Jesus Christ into the
      liquid society dissolved in the putrescent liberal acid…….p. 194 

46. The fluid and putrescent society of today is all born 
      from a fluid and putrescent Church, which is to say  
      from a Church false-pastoral, i.e. hypo-dogmatic,  
      born from a fluid and putrescent Council, i.e. from  
      a false-pastoral Council, that is hypo-dogmatic:

      the very modernist Ecumenical Council Vatican II…..p. 198

47. Professor Ratzinger, in short: Evolution 
      or Redemption? “Mais naturellement, oui: 
‘Èvoludemption’! In English ‘Evoludemption’!That’s what they say, right?”…………………………………..p. 202 
                                        
48. The fanciful and palpable contradictions 
      of an antipope, and the false and non-existent
      contradictions of the Truth…………………………………………p. 207 
                                        
49. How Ratzingerian Ultra-Idealism – surpassing himself, 
      as indeed was predictable –  it has become  
     “the Ratzinger-Teilhardian Theological System”……………p. 208 
                                        
50. To Catholic dogma absolutely not enough that 
      Paradise is located « in the memory of God ». 
      To Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, on the contrary,
instead yes. Who is right?………………………………………..p. 212 

51. The « resuscitation of the bodies » according to the two
      New Cathars: Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin s. j. and
      the Monsignor Joseph Aloisius Professor Ratzinger………p. 216 

52. No devils, for Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, nor damned.
   The Hell, in fact, is not only empty, but, for him, 
   it isn’t even there………………………………………………………p. 228 

53. So no devils, damned and Hell, for the Prof. Ratzinger, 
      but not even Limbo, Purgatory and Paradise. Thus
      is solved at the root “the Great Problem of Evil”.……..p. 230 54. Add “Christ Omega” to “Christ Community”. This,
      with the drafting of Introduction to Christianity, is the
      
large strategy of Professor Joseph Mgr. Ratzinger.…..p. 23955. Says “Tübingen”: « In the one and indivisible God exists
      the phenomenon of dialogue ». But motion, in God,
doesn’t exist. So, how can there be ‘dialogue’, 
which certainly is a motion?……………………………………….p. 244 
                                        
56.  The Professor Ratzinger is the real great theorist of the
       II Vatican Council: it is he who has been able to find in the 
       SS. Trinity the cornerstone of the praxis there born and
       brought to full maturity by the antipope Bergoglio……….p. 24857.  Trinitarian continuity and discontinuity, that are
 substantial, decisive, between the Prof. of Tübingen
       and the antipope today increasingly indecently
       reigning.…………………………………………………………………p. 25458. The Professor of Tübingen does not even imagine
      what hides the Trinitarian « diá-lógos » invented
      by him.. But the non-Pope “fake simpleton” 
      understood this immediately.…………………………………..p. 258
                                                                      
59. The small Greek particle ‘diá’ is the Ratzingerian least
      iota that, exploding in three powerful errors, it subverts
      the essence of God and the whole earth, as it can only 
      the most furious spiritual cataclysm in the world…………..p. 261

60. Says the Professor from Tübingen: « The three  
      Persons of the SS. Trinity dialogue ». « No – says  
     the antipope “Francis” firmly –the three Persons  
     quarrel, but they do not show it ».………………………………p. 26361. “To dialogue! To dialogue!” They shouted joyfully  
       the Fathers of the II Vatican Council leaving St. Peter’s 
      “(Thus the world will no longer grimly at us)”……………..p. 267
          
62. There is a problem: that “the Great Problem of Evil”
      is exalted by the Redemption of Christ, 
      which frees man from things as sin, death and Hell, 
      which however are no there left. So what do we do? 
      Simple: you change Redemption.
……………………………..p. 270 

63. Analysis of what is called “medium term”, that is, 
      of the topics chosen by the Professor of Tübingen
      to “forget” the work of Redemption of Jesus Christ………p. 274 

64. But the narrator of the Holy Scriptures is it God
      or is the Professor of  Tübingen?…………………………………p. 279 

65. Analysis of the final conclusions reached by the Professor
      Ratzinger for remove, indeed for cancel, without  
     being seen by none, the Redemption of Jesus Christ……..p. 288 

66. 
Diá’ and ‘relation’. Two of the many small iota
       not to be included in any way in the Catholic doctrine
       on the SS. Trinity. 

       But inserted secretly by a Professor of Tübingen……..p. 296 
                    
67. The basic Christological error of the Theologian 
      of Tübingen it is to place the starting point 
      of the Catholic Faith in the Cross, and not, as it is, 
      in the glory of the Resurrection…………………………………..p. 300

68. The premise necessary and sufficient to solve all the problems
      that arise from the “Great Problem of Evil”………………….p. 304 

69. Here are all the problems of the “Great Problem of Evil”.
      But also their holy, unique and Christ-like solution…..p. 309 

70. How can serious explanatory work be transformed
      of the doctrine in a dangerous ideology, 
      that is, in horrid idol………………………………………………….p. 321 

71. Let us now speak of the Blessed Virgin.
      “But why – asks Professor Ratzinger –, 
      must She be a virgin? There was no need”.……………….p. 326 72. Professor Ratzinger, tell us: the Church of Christ 
      is or is not only and uniquely the Roman Catholic 
      Apostolic Church?……………………………………………………p. 34273. Without Livi’s notion of  “Common sense”, there is 
      a big risk: even that the idol ‘community’ be born – as  
      Professor Ratzinger does – from the Holy Scriptures……p. 348 74. Sacrificed to the Ratzingerian idol ‘Community’
      also the lively and most loving hermit spirituality…………p. 354 

75. But there is any ruby, or sapphire, or perhaps 
      a diamond, of which the Church can treasure, adorn
      itself with, clothe itself with, that is not ideologically 
      scratched by the philosophical slant from which 
      moves the distinguished Professor of Tübingen?………p. 358 76. For a start, a nice ruby: Professor Ratzinger would hate, 
      just like Professor Livi, “theological utilitarianism”. 
      Yeah, but then: why use it?…………………………………………p. 35977. Almost a diamond, the one on page 195, 
      where we discover that the doctrine of Jesus 
      is Jesus himself. Yes, very good. But… ……………………….p. 361 

78. Unexpectedly a sapphire, and great, immense:
      a boundless and moving sapphire like the celestial vault..p. 36379. We conclude by adorning ourselves with an amethyst,
      and let’s go back to the problem from which we started: 
      and good “Tübingen” to make it a question of method…p. 36880. Conclusion: MENE – TEKEL – PERES.
      What does it mean?……………………………………………….p. 372

      MENE Dn 5:26
      « God as computed Your Kingdom – Your life – 
      and ended it
 ».

      At the heart of Ratzinger. By Pope Ratzinger:
      “Repent, and You will save not only Your life,
      but that of the whole Church!”……………………………….p. 379

      TEKEL Dn 5:27
     « You were weighed on the scales 
      and You were been found insufficient
 ». 

      At the heart of the Pastor of the Church. 
      Of all the Pastor of the Church: 
      “Choose: are You Catholics,

      or are You Ratzingerians, that is Modernists?”………..p. 388

      PERES Dn 5:28
     « Your Kingdom will be divided
      and given to the Medes and the Persians
 ».

      At the heart of the antipope, yes: 
      by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio.
      “Return the Throne you usurped, 
      and the Lord will look back at you!”……………………….p. 397(Pagina protetta dai diritti editoriali).

(Go Up.)

* * *  Oppure può essere richiesto – col 15% di sconto sul prezzo di copertina, dedica e copia numerata –, così come possono essere richiesti i cinque articoli integrativi sopra segnalati, con una E-MAILall’Autore.* * *
https://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/emr/aureadomus/blocco_bibliografia.html * * *PAGE STARTHOMEPAGE · CONVIVIUM · ACÙLEUS · HORTUS · GYMNASIUM
ROMANO AMERIO · EIKÒNA · THESAURUS · CALENDARIUM 
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ratzinger and the devastating today’s crisis of the Church cannot be understood if we don’t follow the Author in this compelling approaching march that leads us to enter the heart of Pope Benedict XVI

Not to be missed these pages with which Enrico Maria Radaelli faces the Renunciation of Benedict XVI of 11 February 2013 from a completely new point of view: it, explains the Scholar, is the well-elaborated fruit of the most brilliant, explosive, but especially invisible heresy never devised by a man of the Church to make the way to God easier: it his the Ratzingerism.

Ratzinger and the devastating today’s crisis of the Church cannot be understood if we don’t follow the Author in this compelling approaching march that leads us to enter the heart of Pope Benedict XVI as not even himself as done, one with his doctrine, for which “Reaching God – this is his synthesis – you can, but with a smile and without dramas: no sin, no blood of Christ to appease God the Father, no God the Father who cruelly demands it, no sinners and therefore no more Hell.” A brilliant heresy? Radaelli even counts eighteen of them, with which the Professor who will become Pope cut and sews a doctrinal kind of simple and attractive, apparently Catholic dress, but which is not at all: easy to carry, Ratzingerism has the advantage of being invisible, therefore to look like original Christianity – quilted as it is with lights, gems and rare pearls, that is, with very fine considerations and concepts –, but it is not at all, and it is much, so much more comfortable to wear, and in fact its Inventor is loved and appreciated in the Church as one of the ours most orthodox Shepherds of today.

In the first English edition of the book, the Prequel illustrates the three substantial errors which, starting from this doctrine, substantially invalidate the Renunciation of Benedict XVI, so the Pope is still he, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is just a very conscious antipope at the head of a very unwitting anti-church.

These pages were written and are now published to bring Pope Ratzinger and the whole Church back to reality, that is, to God. Thus the world will return to the Church.

*  *  *

If Benedict XVI acknowledges the three substantial errors made with the Renunciation,

indicated here on pp. XXXIX and XL, and will recognize that he is still the Pope,

 the Church, with a single act, will achieve five great victories, all willed by God:

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Benedict XVI returns to obey the Laws of God, thus indicating to the Church the right

and only way to be saved the soul;

Benedict XVI essentially reject, with a single act, the Hegelian doctrine from which his invalid Renunciation was born;

Benedict XVI takes away from the antipope Bergoglio the Throne he had seized and allows the poor and more or less unaware anti-church that followed him to return to obey the true and only Pontiff who has every right to be;

Benedict XVI rescinds all the serious and heretical acts of government of these nine years of the Church, first of all the attempt to cancel the only Catholic Liturgy able to appease God the Father of His righteous indignation, the Apostolicus Romanusque Ordo Missæ;

Benedict XVI reconfirms the Church in holy doctrine, perhaps sealing his very important

and very special act with an extraordinary and divinely demanding Locutio ex cathedra.

* * * LET US FOLLOW GOD’S WILL, BROTHERS, AND WE WILL BE SAVED! * * *

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A book against Pope Ratzinger or a book to save Pope Ratzinger? Breaking the veil with which even the most apparently faithful Pastors of the Church have blinded their eyes for nine years in order to hide the truth, the book I am proposing shows, for the first time in the world, all the very gravely erroneous and articulated doctrine Hegelian taught since 1967 at the Univer- sity of Tübingen by Prof. Ratzinger, who, climbing the most important steps of the Magisterium to the highest, is revered by all as the most formidable cham- pion of the faith.

ONE BOOK ALONE AGAINST EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE, OR ONE BOOK TO SAVE EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE ?

First: a book against Pope Ratzinger or a book to save Pope Ratzinger? Breaking the veil with which even the most apparently faithful Pastors of the Church have blinded their eyes for nine years in order to hide the truth, the book I am proposing shows, for the first time in the world, all the very gravely erroneous and articulated doctrine Hegelian taught since 1967 at the Univer- sity of Tübingen by Prof. Ratzinger, who, climbing the most important steps of the Magisterium to the highest, is revered by all as the most formidable cham- pion of the faith. Now, given that de internis non iudicat prætor, objective, public facts are found in the book, given which, see pp. 357-8, with great apprehen- sion Pope Benedict is shown the only way to save himself from the grave danger that would await him if he does not disavow his terrible doctrines.

Second: a book against the “Ratzingerians” or to save the “Ratzingerians”? On this basis, for the first time in the world it is shown with the most irrefu- table and rigorous evidence that the Renunciation made on 11 February 2013 by Benedict XVI is invalid and null and void, and only because it was elabo- rated on the basis of the erroneous Hegelian doctrine of which above, which all the Cardinals and Bishops of the Church have supinely accepted, except two, one of whom also wanted to draft the important Preface now placed at the end of the book. However, if these Pastors recognize that the Renuncia- tion is invalid, as demonstrated on pp. LXXVI ff. and on pp. 366-8, the writer here is the first to point out that they too would save themselves from the ter- rible punishment that awaits those who adhere to erroneous doctrines, always in compliance with the above judicial principle.

Third: a book against “Francis” or a book to save “Francis”? From what has been said it follows that “Francis” is in reality an anti-pope, so that what has just been said also applies to him: if he too recognizes that the Conclave which (knowing he is electing an anti-pope: the facts are objective) elected him on the 13th March 2013 is invalid and null, he too will return to obey the Laws of God, as indicated throughout the book, especially on pp. 375-7, thus perhaps saving himself as his modernist accomplices from the punishment re- served for those who betray the Law of God.

TO SHAKE THE CHURCH FROM THE MODERNIST SPELL OF RATZINGERISM TAKES A DIVINE INTERVENTION.

This book should have been little more than a pedantic and perhaps boring doctrinal critical investigation, and instead it immediately revealed much more than that, because somehow a kind of drama soon took to life in it, almost a Greek tragedy in which all the important doctrinal concepts have as though withdrawn into the background, as if they were just a large scenario, the se- vere landscape more and more tormented and anguished, in which events take place that have taken more and more life, breaking up in a jolt in a conclusion

from page to page more and more pressing, unexpected, and, as will be seen, overwhelming.

And this is the point: that this metaphysical essay, wearing the increasingly evident and dramatic garments of a Greek tragedy, turns out to be even more than an invented work, which is precisely a Greek tragedy, showing itself as the crudest and ruthless photograph of a precise fact: that of the Church and the world caught today in their most hasty flight from reality. That is, better: in their most hasty flight from God: from the reality of God. And it is pre- cisely from this detailed and documented discovery that the drama was born: from the merciless photograph of a precise, very current and global event; but, even before that, it is precisely from here that the rigorous, documented and scientific philosophical analysis of those Ratzingerian doctrines from which that drama came to life was born.

And this is where the book “exploded”. Yes: it really “exploded” into un- expected and very lively images of Angels, Archangels, Cherubs and Serafini, because its almost five hundred pages were suddenly animated by unexpected Celestial Creatures, don’t ask me how, don’t ask why, as if the thousand terri- ble doctrinal truths unfolded had felt the most imperative need to make eve- ryone see clearly, from the first to the last page, the faces, eyes, mouths and lips of those who were really uttering those terrible and powerful words of in- disputable truth, so that, among a hundred clouds torn here and there by dart- ing rays of the sun or by flashes of lightning and lightning, they came to life, among those writings of high metaphysics about a more than justly much loved and universally well appreciated personality, and we are obviously talk- ing about Pope Joseph Ratzinger, dozens of ineffable creatures who somehow made their way between the lines, the drop caps, the references, the headlines, shaking them and violating them. and with no respect for the structural order, now with the most moving, weeping and painful sweetness, now with the most unusual roughness and arrogance, in any case always without having asked anyone’s permission, certainly not me.

Result? I wish the readers were to judge him. We could perhaps imagine this strange book with a somewhat four-faced look as if it were not at all shy, but determined, unstoppable and comely last Muse, also released, like all her other sweet sisters, due to the urgency of the Truth to show us that it can reach our hearts not only through the irresistible force of the most reasoned and solid logic, but because it is precisely this Truth, in itself Truth, that is at- tractive, that is splendid, that is beautiful, that is, that is boundlessly desirable, to be married immediately and forever.

Why marry? Because the Truth that lives in Beauty is our Lord Jesus Christ himself, Verbum et Imago Dei, and he is our Spouse, it is He who awaits us from heaven, to make us live forever. Forever, do you understand? Together with him, in the Father’s arms of love. What are we waiting to be convinced?

Enrico Maria Radaelli

At the heart of Ratzinger. He is the Pope, not the other.

Preface by H.E.R. Mgr. René Henry Gracida.
Edizioni Aurea Domus, Milan 2022, pp. LXXX + 419= pp. 499), € 60,00 (Launch offer = € 45,00).

Apply to: aureadomus.emr@gmail.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DAY CARE CAN POSE A PROBLEM FOR THE FORMATION OF THE CHARACTER OF THE VERY YOUNG IF THE ABSENCE TO PARENTAL GUIDANCE/AFFECTION IS SIGNIFICANT

Save draftPreviewPublish



THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Flashback – Rush’s Question: “How many Mass Shooters went to Day Care?” is Answered by Fr. Ripperger 

Rush Limbaugh announces he has 'advanced lung cancer' | KNZR 1560 AM 97.7 FM

On November 7, 2017, Rush Limbaugh on his show, mentioning the research of psychoanalyst and researcher Erica Komisar into the negative psychological effects of day care, asked the question:

“How many mass shooters went to day care?”

Scholar and author Fr. Chad Ripperger, P.hD., who wrote “Introduction to the Science of Mental Health” answered Limbaugh’s question:

“I am waiting for her [,a psychological expert,] to actually write the article…. because she is a phenomenal psychologist and a fantastic researcher. She was noticing all these people mowing these people down, not the Moslems, but the actual people from our culture going in and shooting people.”

“She said ‘I wonder if they have a common element?'”

“They only had one thing in common: day care!”

“The Church has known for centuries or for millennia that the primary period of moral formation for a child is between two and six. That’s when the associations of right and wrong are built up… That is when they are in the day care getting no moral formation.”

“… The problem is that the children aren’t getting the proper psychological nursing [from their mothers]. They are ending up with disaffective disorder which means they have a disability to have empathy with people. That’s why they can mow people down.”
(Fr. Chad Ripperger, YouTube, “The 6th Generation, Generational Spirits: Lost Generation to the One Current,” 55:33 to 56:42)

As Fr. Ripperger has said a number of times:

“[I]t is a mortal sin for a woman [mother] to work outside the home without a sufficient reason.”
Fr. Chad Ripperger, YouTube, “Feminism and the Natural Order,” 18:08-13)

The shootings are in many ways the Church’s fault because for the last 50 years the Church, for the most part, has been negligent in teaching this basic truth.

As the Church goes so does the world.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Aqua said…

Wonderful post. This inspired conversation with wifey.  

Our conclusion: this is true but there is likely more. I call it Day Care +. It’s the total package. Drop off kid in Day Care + don’t interact, care, love *after* Day Care. “See you at bed time … maybe.” Day Care is the common symptom but selfishness and neglect is he true driver.

Individuals and society have been ordered in our day to value work, production, power, money, riches, toys, activities, fine things. We have been implicitly taught that mothers who stay at home are not complete, not fulfilled, missing out on the joys of working.  

I see it as my mission to not only raise a large family (7 adopted kids and 1 biological) but to share widely with the public what we do on behalf of the cause of life. We do nothing beyond raising and enjoying our kids. Everything we have – time and treasure – goes to them as long as we have strength and resources. The joy of this exchange is incalculable. As we grow older, we receive our repayment in full and with interest. Our home is full. Laughter and love is present. Life is good. Money is an afterthought.

7:35 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Fred Martinez said…

Thank you Aqua for your deep insights. Please pray and ask your wife to pray that I do God’s will in my writing and posting at the Catholic Monitor.

8:00 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Aqua said…

Fred,
Absolutely. Passed it on to my other half also.

Communion of Saints. In Christ.

10:33 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Fred Martinez said…

Thank you very much Aqua.

11:03 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

MEwbank said…

Truly, I doubt most of those who have been mass shooters went to ‘Day Care’ government programs. In fact, certain people I knew who taught in those programs, which were designed to supposedly help the poorest of families, typically tried to offer an environment in which some real order and personal formation were available to certain children from pathetic familial circumstances that usually lacked all of the above.

But as for the ‘mass shooters’, in looking at their backgrounds, they were typically from rather well-off families. Of course, they were likely totally malformed with television, and lacked any profound parental guidance or sound religious formation.

Most, according to certain investigators, had in common also a reliance upon prescription psychotropic pharmaceuticals to compensate for biochemical abnormalities, likely caused, again, by irregular familial and home lives with order and proper nutrition, etc.

As for Fr. Ripperger’s generalizations, I think it disputable that demons, as such, are inherited by generations. Rather, individuals in subsequent generations can accept the vices, malicious habits, of a previous generation, and it is they themselves who maintain the ‘tradition’ of sin. Of course, demons are always around to tempt, but they are not able to usurp liberty.

Nothing I have said, however, is incompatible with the fact that the deliberate destruction of the Church over the last half-century plus truly contributed and accelerated our social decline.

Had the Church maintained its integrity, the secular order would not have become so subject to and permeated with such pervasively grave evils that prevail today.

9:50 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Fred Martinez said…

Fr. Ripperger speaks of evidence. Please present your evidence for your assertions.

10:38 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

MEwbank said…

Mr. Martinez, it is you who speak of Fr. Ripperger’s testifying of based on evidence. Rather, you must present to me his specific, historical evidence for his assertions.

I have a high regard for your reflections, but I do not accept arguments based merely on the purported ‘authority’ of a another person. 

Authority is only compelling in matters of supernatural faith, and Fr. Ripperger is in terms of how he interprets things to be that he supposedly has witnessed.

My words above, on the other hand, are based on what I have indicated, other’s investigations of the events who discerned actual usage of various psychotropic drugs by most of the perpetrators of these heinous crimes. You can easily verify that these analyses exist and judge for yourself whether they are coherent.

But one always should look for proximate causes of things before immediately seeking higher causes, even though those, too, may be factors in them.

As for my observations about ‘Dare Care’ and the backgrounds of most of those ‘mass shooting’ perpetrators, this, too, can be verified by simply looking things up.

11:07 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

MEwbank said…

Mr. Martinez, it is you who speak of Fr. Ripperger’s testifying to the truth of his judgments as based on evidence. Rather, you must present to me his specific, historical evidence for his assertions.

I have a high regard for your reflections, but I do not accept arguments based merely on the purported ‘authority’ of another person. 

Authority is only compelling in matters of supernatural faith, and Fr. Ripperger is speaking of how he interprets things to be that he supposedly has witnessed.

My words above, on the other hand, are based on what I have indicated, other’s investigations of the events who discerned actual usage of various psychotropic drugs by most of the perpetrators of these heinous crimes. You can easily verify that these analyses exist and judge for yourself whether they are coherent.

But one always should look for proximate causes of things before immediately seeking higher causes, even though those, too, may be factors in them.

As for my observations about ‘Day Care’ and the backgrounds of most of those ‘mass shooting’ perpetrators, this, too, can be verified by simply looking things up.

11:09 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Aqua said…

I think where MEwbank and Catholic Monitor meet are strong the point of Church collapse. The collapse of our leavening Body in society has led to the destruction of the social foundation at the molecular level: the family.  

I don’t doubt that investigators will find a strong and direct correlation between Day Care attendance and the microscopically small but disproportionately deadly mass murderers. But as MEwbank infers there is likely much more to the story.  

My guess is Day Care is the leading symptom, but not the primal cause. The primal cause is the destruction of the family unit and the removal of God from family altars across the land – which in a spiritually healthier time was the leading subtext of our civilization.

Now, politics has removed God from public spaces and public worship and reverence is under attack. Where the Church should be building up the beleaguered Faithful, it is instead facilitating the public evil done against us by our politicians. Where the Church should be making God present to the beleaguered Faithful at the Holy Altar, it is instead shrouding God by profane alterations to Liturgy.

And so, parents who should sacrifice their time and treasure on behalf of their children, instead drop their children off at Day Care as part of a secular choice to pursue pleasures, comforts and financial advance and in widely varying degrees neglect the children God has granted father and mother as their greatest gift and responsibility in life. And at the extremes, this leads to spiritual and psychological trauma in varying degrees that in the most extreme cases leads to aggression, violence and in very rare cases mass murder.

Repent! Humble ourselves! Return to God. That is my answer to what ails America. There is really no other solution. We need not wait for Priests. This is on us.

11:31 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

MEwbank said…

Yes, Aqua, overall I totally agree with your articulation. 

I definitely witnessed how the implosion of the Church catalyzed the ascendant dissolution of secular societies.

My only cautions, mentioned above, are that when analyzing horrible evil events that have common features one must, first of all, grasp the most proximate causes to explain things.

Yes, dissolution of the family is presupposed when one considers how children are formed now by nihilist figures in media, movies, popular music, video games, etc., along with so-called vacuous educators in the regular school systems.

And a further correlative is the ersatz nutrition so readily available in our culture, which only augments potential biochemical imbalances individual children may have.

This, in turn, is readily dealt with by a corrupt medical-pharmaceutical industry that disseminates psychotropic pharmaceuticals plentifully and without regard for the long-term consequences, merely for unbridled monetary profit. 

Demons need not do much when man destroy themselves.

But the implosion of the Church’s culture beginning well over a half-century ago, the consequential failure to vigorously promote orthodoxy and orthopraxy, have been the major dispositive cause of this surrounding corruption within our secular societies and all these aforementioned issues are correlates of that dissolution.

Best regards.

11:46 AM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

MEwbank said…

Apologies, I overlooked my mistake of hitting an ‘a’ when keying ‘men destroy themselves.’

1:08 PM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Fred Martinez said…

MEwbank, 

Good point. On another matter, I tried to get in contact with Fr. Ripperger through my friend Rod Pead, editor of the Christian Order in England who published some of his writings, but he no longer had a contact number.

I thought that was a weak point in the post. But, I have read and listened to much of Fr. Rippinger’s work so I trust he has the evidence to back up his assertion. If I can acquire the information of the psychologist he spoke of I will post it.

I would be interested in the investigations you speak of. I am sincerely interested in those investigations.

Thank you for your kind words.

God bless you.

2:00 PM

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blogger_logo_round_35.png

Therese said…

Great post! Great comments in the box!

4:42 PMSHARE

SHARE

Comments



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BETO MADE A FOOL OF HIMSELF AT THE GOVERNORS PRESS CONFERENCE YESTERDAY IN UVALDE

Beto Blasted for ‘Clearly Staged’ Photo Op During Texas Tragedy In Uvalde, Texas

By

 Paul Duke

 – 

May 26, 2022

 Facebook Twitter Pinterest

For simple people, tragedy is but another opportunity for advancement,no mater just how insidious that misfortune was.

This appeared to certainly be the case for Beto O’Rourke, the Texas politician who arrived on the scene years ago on a skateboard and whose bombastic nature hasn’t dwindled since.

CBS News suggested Beto O’Rourke likely staged his surprise appearance at Gov. Greg Abbott’s press conference on the deadly Texas school shooting Wednesday.

Although the public was largely surprised by the Texas gubernatorial candidate interrupting Abbott while he provided updates on the mass shooting at Robb Elementary school, CBS correspondent Janet Shamlian, who was present at the conference, claimed the appearance was “clearly staged.”

Onlookers seemed sure.

“Well, I did see what happened just before the press conference started. I was in the third row on the aisle, and there were two people across the aisle from me. And a moment before the press conference started, they got up from their seats when Beto walked in, so they were seat holders for him,” Shamlian recounted. “Then, he sat down. So his presence wasn’t really noticed in the 15 or 20 minutes that people were gathering inside, because he was not in the room. This seems something very clearly from Beto O’Rourke wanting to confront the governor at this moment.”

The gauche maneuver belies a stunning Democratic usefulness worldwide.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Whether the problem is mass shootings, back pain or water in the basement, all problem resolutions depend on an accurate diagnosis. If the diagnosis is right it doesn’t guarantee a resolution, but if the diagnosis is wrong, it guarantees that there will not only not be an acceptable resolution but there will probably pain and suffering for one or more persons.


Why Mass Shootings Will Continue
May 26, 2022 Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on the latest mass shootings:
Whether the problem is mass shootings, back pain or water in the basement, all resolutions depend on an accurate diagnosis. If the diagnosis is right it doesn’t guarantee a resolution, but if it is wrong, it guarantees there won’t be one.
The ruling class, especially the media, are consumed with race and guns in America, yet the mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas and Buffalo, like those in Dayton and El Paso in 2019, have little to do with either. It is not as though there aren’t some common causes, threads of behavior that link all mass shootings. There are. But the media are looking in all the wrong places, thus providing the wrong diagnosis. This, in turn, ensures the wrong remedies.
There are five major reasons why we have mass shootings: the killer is asocial; he comes from a seriously dysfunctional family; he has mental issues; he is fascinated by violence; and red flags were ignored by almost everyone.
Salvador Ramos is the mass shooter from Uvalde. His boss at Wendy’s where he worked said of him, “He felt like the quiet type, the one who doesn’t say much. He really didn’t socialize with employees.” His loner status was exacerbated by his heavy social media use.
Before Ramos killed the young students and the teachers, he killed his grandmother. He didn’t go to visit her—he was living with her. He was living with her because his mother was a drug addict.
One of Ramos’ friends said, “he’d cut up his face with knives over and over and over.” When he asked why he did that, Ramos said he did it for fun. He was also known for shooting people with his BB gun—random people. He said he wanted to join the Marines because then he could kill people.
Payton Gendron is the Buffalo mass shooter.
According to an AP story, “he had long been viewed by classmates as a loner.” “Most people didn’t associate with him,” said one of his peers. “They didn’t want to be known as friends with a kid who was socially awkward and nerdy.” This contributed to his isolation. “He talked about how he didn’t like school because he didn’t have friends. He would say he was lonely.” The way he dressed didn’t help: he was known wear a hazmat suit to class (the whole-body garment worn to protect against hazardous materials).
Gendron loved violence. He described how he killed a cat who had invaded the space of his own cat, stabbing it with a knife. “It bled from the mouth….I was able to grab the cat’s tail and wind up and smack the cat’s head on the concrete ground. I did that a few times and when it went limp I grabber [sic] a hatchet and swung at its neck—20 times until it came off.”
Classmates, according to the AP, said Gendron had “a fascination with guns.” He often went target shooting by himself and contemplated what he said would be a “murder-suicide.”
Patrick Wood Crusius was the mass shooter from El Paso. He sat alone in the school bus. “He wouldn’t talk to people,” said one of his neighbors. “No one really knew him.”
His father suffered from drug and alcoholic addiction for nearly 40 years, tearing up both of his marriages. Crusius suffered from lifelong neurological and mental disabilities and spent most of his time in school in special education. He was fascinated by far right-wing extremism.
Connor Betts was the Dayton mass shooter. One of his bandmates called him a “loner.” Another peer said he was a quiet kid who kept to himself. Of the nine people whom he killed, one was his sister. His parents showed how dysfunctional they were when they issued a highly inappropriate obituary lauding him in the most glowing terms without saying a word about his victims, including their daughter.
The police said he had a “history of obsession with violent ideations with mass shootings and expressed a desire to commit a mass shooting”; he carried a “hit list” of classmates. He was fascinated with far left-wing extremism; he was a fan of Antifa.
There is plenty of social science evidence indicating that troubled students offer many signs—indeed red flags—that should merit attention. They rarely do. While there is a lot of blame to go around, there are policies and laws that contribute to this reticence.
Experts on the workplace report that employees do not report misconduct because they fear they will lose their job or will be otherwise sanctioned by their boss. There are laws, such as those in New York City, that make public the name and address of crime victims, thus deterring them from coming forth, fearing retaliation.
We need to encourage people to come forward and to act on red flags. We also need to get to these young men early on and not pretend that they are simply eccentric. Most of all, we need policies and laws that strengthen the family, paying special attention to the needs of young men.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Joe Biden has had a long history of racist outbursts. Can we even remember them all? The “put y’all back in chains” insults to an audience of black professionals, his dismissal of black interviewers variously as “you ain’t black” or ”junkie,” his he-man racialist Corn Pop mythologies, his recent condescending reference to a black professional as “boy,” and on and on.

May 25, 2022

___________________________________________________

>Victor Davis Hanson –  Joe Biden and Racial Demagoguery

_______________________________________________

 Joe Biden and 

Racial Demagoguery

By: Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

May 23, 2022

Joe Biden has had a long history of racist outbursts. Can we even remember them all? The “put y’all back in chains” insults to an audience of black professionals, his dismissal of black interviewers variously as “you ain’t black” or ”junkie,” his he-man racialist Corn Pop mythologies, his recent condescending reference to a black professional as “boy,” and on and on.

The Left has always contextualized his racial outbursts in the same fashion his decades-long creepy touching, sexual harassment, grabbing, and blowing into the hair and ears of young women and teens were always “just Joe being Joe.”

So it was ironic but predictable that Biden went to Buffalo on Tuesday to leverage the recent carnage from the deranged, eco-fascist, racist, and insane lethal mass shooter of 11 African-Americans. Read the gunman’s manifesto: it is an unhinged collage of green fascist, racist, and politically incoherent mishmash.

Purported right-wing monsters usually don’t hate Fox News and Ben Shapiro or go on endless green screeds. No matter. For Biden, as his midterm rendezvous looms ominously, the Buffalo shooter was useful in smearing his political opponents. So Biden saw a trip to Buffalo as an opportunity, in a way other mass shootings were not, and made a rare excursion out of his secluded compound.

The Great Asymmetries

Biden’s despicable effort at blaming his political adversaries for the deaths failed for lots of reasons. He mangled his recitations of prior white-on-black shootings by including the recent Dallas shootings of three Asians by an African-American in his catalog of white-supremacist murders.

Biden by intent ignored the near-simultaneous mass shooting of Taiwanese parishioners by a deranged Chinese gunman.

Of course, he has said nothing either in the past or in the present about the mass murder by the black nationalist and BLM sympathizer Darrell Brooks. The latter deliberately used his car to mow down white children and elderly people. Most media outlets, given their selective indifference to the loss of human life, described the killings as done by a wayward SUV, as if it was driven on some sort of autopilot.

The Left in general and Biden in particular scan the daily news for opportunities for racial demagoguery. When black shooters try to gas and maim white commuters on the subway, or when there is an epidemic of anti-Asian hate crimes committed disproportionately by black males, or an unhinged Bernie Sanders activist attempts to murder House Republican leaders, the Left is silent or insists the hard ideology or racism the shooter embraces is either irrelevant or somehow a natural response to some sort of provocation. Again, it selectively sees or does not see connections between political discourse and crazy people who commit mass mayhem—depending entirely upon the political ore to be mined.

The effort to pigeonhole mass shootings for political gain necessarily results in hypocrisy, fantasy, and outright lying. Suddenly cars are animated objects. Black nationalist racial hatred expressed on social media is derided as right-wing talking points. Joe Biden cites African-American shooters of Asians as white supremacist killers.

In the end, we are left only with the surreal: an Al Sharpton screaming about the culpability of conservatives for the Buffalo shooting—this, from the racial arsonist of the age, who originally came to notice through his racial hatred and anti-Semitism that led to riots and death. Or a raving Joy Reid, known previously for her homophobic tweets and more recently for her nightly harangues about a current white collective that is communally guilty for the sins of those long dead.

One of the strangest ironies is the Left’s denunciation of supposed conservative adherence to the “great replacement theory”—or the fear that nonwhite populations are by design replacing a dwindling white minority, and both are politically predictable because of their race or ethnic background. But if that were so, why would white conservatives abhor abortion that disproportionally destroys black and brown lives in the womb?

In contrast, why do good progressives like the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg confess that abortion was targeting the proper people. (“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”) Further, why did current Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen argue that black abortions were economically rational? “In many cases, abortions are of teenage women, particularly low income, and often black, who aren’t in a position to be able to care for children, have unexpected pregnancies, and it deprives them of the ability, often, to continue their education to later participate in the workforce,” Yellen said last week. “It means that children will grow up in poverty and do worse themselves.”

So once more, the Left projects. Replacement theories are a hallmark of leftist political science. They usually appear in triumphalist books and articles gushing about how “demography is destiny” and “the new Democratic majority” that will doom supposedly white Republicans and conservatives.

Boasts about flipping red and purple states blue follow, as we are lectured that California, Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico are now blue due to unchecked immigration. So too, we are told, will Arizona and Texas soon follow.

More perniciously, the Left does its best to restrict immigration from areas deemed problematic such as Cuba. So the “great replacement theory” is largely the Left’s name for conservative anger at the intentional destruction of our southern border—most recently in a time of a pandemic—to mainstream illegal immigration for largely selfish political interests. Demographic obsessions are largely a progressive fixation.

Note that the Hispanic populations, galvanized by Biden’s culpably for high fuel prices, hyperinflation, support for radical abortion on demand, and, ironically, open borders, may soon split its political loyalties in November in a way once deemed unimaginable.

If that happens, then the Left will likely recalibrate Mexican Americans as virtual Cubans and thus close the southern border, given illegal immigration will no longer be seen by their admission as useful demographically.

From Hypocrisy to Projection

Three final points about the Biden demagoguery of race.

First, the hypocrisy on race simply follows the hard-left double standards on a host of issues.

By all means let us sanction, condemn, and oppose Russia’s vicious attack on Ukraine. But the Left shows no such animosity toward a far greater existential threat to the United States—Communist China. It has destroyed an independent Tibet. It has absorbed and ruined a once democratic and free Hong Kong. It promises to end autonomy and democracy for Taiwan. And it has bullied and threatened every other consensual government in its neighborhood, from Australia and Japan to South Korea and the Philippines.

The Left ignores Chinese culpability for hiding and obstructing the truth about the Wuhan lab origins of COVID-19 that has nearly wrecked civilization as we once knew it. It calls racist anyone who worries that China is waging a systematic effort to steal all the technology and research it can from the United States.

Almost every leftist-dominated institution, whether defined as corporate America, professional sports, Hollywood, or academia, refuses to call out systemic Chinese racism, reeducation camps, and the ethnic cleansing of Uyghur minorities, largely due to lucrative joint ventures.

Similarly, the Left applies different standards to its own. In summer 2020, some 120 days of rioting, $2 billion in property damage, over 35 deaths, 1,500 police injuries, and the torching of an iconic church, police precinct, and federal courthouse were all contextualized.

We were told the destruction of property was not a crime, that the United States always has embraced violent protests, that flames licking the skies were not evidence of violence, and, by our current vice president, that such violence would not stop.

And she was correct. The street violence did not cease, because it was seen as helpful for the 2020 election. When the looting, arson, and killing began to boomerang against the Left and were deemed no longer advantageous, the violence magically ceased in the final weeks before the election and throughout the Biden transitions and tenure.

Contrast all that with the buffoonish, despicable riot in the Capitol by an ad hoc group of crazies. It was labeled an “insurrection.” The media then systematically lied about the five deaths that occurred on January 6, creating fables about the tragic natural demise of Officer Brian Sicknick. It smothered mention of FBI informants in the crowds, hid information about the circumstances of the lethal shooting of Ashli Babbitt, and smirked about suspects put in solitary confinement for months without being charged or tried.

The strangest embarrassment on the Left is its current neo-Confederate impulse. Many blue progressive states are becoming one-party, feudal societies reminiscent of the antebellum, plantationists, solid-Democratic South. They are likewise inimical to the middle classes who are fleeing California, Illinois, and New York. The new Left fixates—in the fashion of the old South—on one-drop racial identification integral to race-based preferences, oblivious of class and wealth.

It promotes segregation on campuses, with racially exclusive safe spaces, dorms, and graduations. Its Southern embrace of nullification of federal law through over 500 sanctuary city jurisdictions is reminiscent of South Carolina in the 1830s. And it talks of state rights as if blue-state environmentalism, abortion, and illegal immigration should be exempt from federal statutes—in the fashion of George Wallace resisting federal mandates on integration. More recently, we see parlor talk of blue-state secession in journals like the Nation and The New Republic in the fashion of 1850s pamphleteering in the Carolinas.

If Donald Trump did not accept the vote count for 2020, then it is legitimate to criticize him. But he was only following in the footsteps of the denialist Stacey Abrams. She toured the country after losing the governorship of Georgia by over 50,000 votes and was hailed by the Left for months as the “real” governor of Georgia.

Lest we forget in 2016, the Left claimed a fraudulent election due to wired voting machines. Jill Stein sued to invalidate their ballot counts. Grade-C movie stars cut commercials urging electors to renounce their constitutional mandates. Hillary Clinton boasted of joining the “resistance,” claiming the elected president was illegitimate while urging Joe Biden not to accept the 2020 popular vote if he lost it.

So why does the Left use these mass shootings, involving unhinged, hate-filled killers of all races, as fodder for their agendas? Why is it OK to harass Supreme Court justices at their homes or to threaten them by name outside the Supreme Court chambers?

Hypocrisy is not hypocrisy when the Left feels its moral superiority justifies any means necessary to achieve its utopian ends.

Smear Rather than Defend

Second, the Left must have fungible standards and leverage tragedies for political advantage because it cannot run on its agenda. America was founded on principles of liberty and individualism, rather than the French revolutionary government-mandated equality of result.

Socialism has never appealed to Americans—and never more so than in the past 18 months. If Joe Biden had gone to both Waukesha and Buffalo, preached nonviolence and tolerance, and urged Americans not to judge one another as collectives but as unique individuals, he would have seen it as an opportunity missed to gin up a furor by racializing tragedy.

Indeed, what else could Biden do—run on a secure border and adherence to current federal immigration law? His wisdom of printing trillions of dollars, keeping interest rates artificially low, subsiding labor non-participation, and thus spiking inflation?

Would he point to his brilliance in restricting gas and oil leases, suppressing energy development, and canceling pipelines to deny us affordable energy?

Will he boast of embracing critical race and legal theories, defunding the police, backing city and county prosecutors who don’t prosecute, and emptying the jails and prisons, all resulting in a drastic increase in crime?

Will he preen to midterm voters about the brilliant logistical effort that allowed Americans to flee Afghanistan near instantaneously while abandoning allies and leaving helpers behind while enriching the terrorist Taliban with billions of dollars in sophisticated U.S. weaponry?

America Is a Great Experiment

Finally, we should remember America has always been a fragile country. After all, it is history’s first successful and longest-lasting multiracial constitutional government—the logical reification of the ancient ideas of human political equality, proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

The idea of America has always tried to overcome innate, deeper, and darker human impulses, especially the tic to identify by race, religion, and tribe. That is the historical virus that once unleashed, infects, and destroys society. Witness most recently Rwanda, Iraq, or the former Yugoslavia.

The ancient human pathology to identify by superficial appearance—to see race, for example, as essential rather than incidental to one’s essence—destroys democracies. It must consciously always be repressed, not cultivated to frighten people to support agendas that are otherwise failing them.

Joe Biden is said to be an inert puppet of left-wing masters. Perhaps. But more likely his cognitive challenges have stripped away his political savvy and left him in the raw, revealing his real essence, a racialist of the first order, who will use any tragedy to salvage what has become the worst two years of a presidency in modern memory. And most people now know it.

___________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment