Biden’s liabilities transcend his physical infirmities, his advanced age, and his seeming geometric rather than arithmetic rate of mental decline. 

Why the Left Will 

Cut Biden Loose

Democrats will soon find no further reason to cover for Joe Biden’s own serial abhorrent personal behavior on matters of financial probity, sex, race, and truthfulness.

By: Victor Davis Hanson

American  Greatness

June 22, 2022

Republican pundits and conservative activists are debating whether they can win in 2024 with the successful Trump agenda, but without the controversial Donald Trump as their nominee.  

The Democrats have a similar, but far more serious dilemma with Joe Biden as the Democratic Party’s nominee in 2024.  

Unlike the Trump Administration’s successful four years, Biden’s tenure has been an utter disaster. There are no policy offsets to the personal liabilities and unpopularity of Biden himself. 

Biden’s liabilities transcend his physical infirmities, his advanced age, and his seeming geometric rather than arithmetic rate of mental decline. 

Biden, moreover, proves daily that he is not a nice guy. His excesses, past and present, are precisely those the Left considers mortal sins. 

Walking back Biden’s absurdities has become the nonstop, tiresome task of many on the Left. As they face a midterm disaster in November, many no longer see any compensating reasons not to drop Biden.  

When the Republicans take the House of Representatives in 2022 there will be nonstop investigations of Hunter Biden’s alleged tax avoidances, his possibly illegal work as an unregistered foreign agent, and Joe Biden’s untaxed compensation he received from the Biden lobbying consortium. 

Consider also Biden’s nastiness.

During the 2020 campaign, he personally attacked a young co-ed as a “lying dog-faced pony soldier” and a stocky questioner was reduced to “fat.”

Unlike Trump’s art of the deal, exaggerations, and distortions, Biden says things that are not simply untrue, but abjectly preposterous—such as the United States currently has a lower inflation rate than major European industrial powers. 

In Biden’s world, there were no COVID vaccinations until he took the oath of office. Vladimir Putin, or the oil companies, or the refiners, or Donald Trump are responsible for the historic crippling gasoline price hikes he caused by canceling drilling and pipeline projects. 

Biden claims his negative-growth, hyperinflating economy is not disastrous but strong. 

He serially lies that he drove a semi-truck. He has not been to the Middle East 38 times. He never received an appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy. Nor was he a full professor at the University of Pennsylvania. 

The MAGA movement is not the “most extreme political organization in American history.” 

In other words, Joe Biden reveals the same fantasies and plagiarism that ended his 1988 and 2008 presidential campaigns. 

On matters of race and sexuality, Biden is the epitome of that for which the Left, supposedly, has zero-tolerance. Biden was infamous for damning with praise candidate Barack Obama as the first “clean” and “articulate” African American presidential candidate. 

In a fake patois, Biden once warned an audience of black professionals that Mitt Romney would “put y’all back in chains.” 

During the 2020 campaign, candidate Biden derided a black journalist as a “junkie” and lambasted a radio host and his audience with the claim “you ain’t black” if they didn’t support his candidacy. 

Spinning racialist fables like Biden’s “Corn Pop” stories would brand any conservative politician as a racist. As president, Biden still uses the term “negro,” and he called an African American advisor “boy.”

On disturbing matters of sexuality, Biden is even more coarse. 

After the Justice Brett Kavanaugh hearings, the nation was lectured that “women must be believed.” But it was the Left who attacked former Biden aide Tara Reade who surfaced in 2016 to accuse then-Senator Biden, her former boss, of sexually assaulting her. 

Biden himself had a creepy history of invading the private space of young women—inappropriately kissing them, hugging and squeezing them, and smelling and blowing into their hair and ears. 

Finally, Biden was forced to apologize—sort of—by claiming he belonged to an earlier generation when such aggression was simply normal behavior. It was not then or now. 

The latest controversies whirl around the British tabloid Daily Mail’s publication of the diary of Biden’s daughter. 

From the Mail’s lurid reporting, Ashley Biden seems to suggest that she showered with her father at an age when “showers w/ my dad (probably [were] not appropriate).” And she seemed to connect Biden’s familial inappropriateness with her regret over being “hyper-sexualized [at] a young age.”  

When Donald Trump was accused by porn star Stormy Daniels of a consensual tryst or was caught on old Access Hollywood tape crudely boasting about touching inappropriately female admirers, the resulting uproar nearly derailed the Trump 2016 campaign. 

The point is not just the asymmetrical treatment that has shielded Biden’s cognitive decline, his rude outbursts, his outrageous racialist slurs, and bizarre sexual aggressiveness. 

Instead, the Left now fears Biden’s terrible polls and a worse record—and the resulting damage he is doing to the Democratic Party. 

In such a losing political context, Democrats will soon find no further reason to cover for Biden’s own serial abhorrent personal behavior on matters of financial probity, sex, race, and truthfulness. 

No wonder they are growing desperate to find ways to cut him loose—without making Kamala Harris his successor.

___________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Biden’s liabilities transcend his physical infirmities, his advanced age, and his seeming geometric rather than arithmetic rate of mental decline. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THERE IS GROWING EVIDENCE THAT JORGE BERGOLIO IS A EUGENICIST

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Culture of Death: Might Biden & Francis support Eugenics? 

Today's Gospel Reading - “(We) ...are facing an enormous and dramatic clash  between good and evil, death and life, the “culture of death” and the “ culture of life”. We find ourselves not

JOHN PAUL CONDEMNS `CULTURE OF DEATH – Chicago Tribune…

Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to LifeSitenews.com. _ The CatholicMonitor [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Joe Biden seems to have a particular bias for persons who apparently promote a new kind of eugenics. Breitbart reported that “Joe Biden’s BLM Nominee Pushed Population Control, Defined American Children as ‘Environmental Hazard’”:

Tracy Stone-Manning, President Joe Biden’s nominee to be director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), described American children as an “environmental hazard” while advocating for slowing U.S. population growth in her 1992 graduate thesis.

The Daily Caller reported on Stone-Manning’s thesis, titled “Into the Heart of the Beast| A case for environmental advertising,” after which she was awarded a master of science degree in environmental studies. Her thesis, however, amounted to public policy recommendations for the University of Montana described as “environmental education.”

Stone-Manning called for an advertising campaign to lessen procreation among Americans, ostensibly towards “environmental” ends. She produced a sample poster deriding a shirtless child as an “environmental hazard.”

Her political advertisement asked in its header, “Can you spot the environmental hazard in this photo?” It included the following response:

That’s right, it’s the cute baby. Americans believe that overpopulation is only a problem somewhere else in the world. But it’s a problem here too.” [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/24/joe-biden-nominee-population-control-american-children-environmental-hazard/]

BlabberBuzz also reported extremist Stone-Manning was “connect[ed] to eco-terroris[m]”:

Stone-Manning was slammed over claims that she tricked senators about her connections to the eco-terrorist plot. She has also faced scrutiny for promoting population control to protect the environment in her graduate thesis.

“Given the Biden Administration’s supposed concern for domestic terrorism, this nomination is particularly puzzling and worrisome,” the letter reads. “Tree-spiking is a form of ecoterrorism, considered by the FBI at one point as one of its highest domestic terrorism priorities.”[https://www.blabber.buzz/blab/pop/1028172-manchin-takes-on-biden-alone-once-again?utm_source=c-alrt&utm_medium=c-alrt-email&utm_term=c-alrt-AOL&utm_content=445hiIGUs4ebZpsxV5xzhBGM.A]

Moreover, Biden and Stone-Manning are promoters of the Climate Change or Global Warming ideology. The Washington Times revealed that Climate Change has a “eugenics precedent”:

“Global Warming” had a precursor in capturing the hearts and minds of the world. Michael Crichton, in his novel “State of Fear,” brilliantly juxtaposes the world’s current political embrace of “global warming” with the popular embrace of the “science” of eugenics a century ago. For nearly 50 years, from the late 1800s through the first half of the 20th century, there grew a common political acceptance by the world’s thinkers, political leaders and media elite that the “science” of eugenics was settled science. There were a few lonely voices trying to be heard in the wilderness in opposition to this bogus science, but they were ridiculed or ignored. 

Believers in eugenics argued that we could improve the human race by controlling reproduction. The most respected scientists from Harvard, Yale, Princeton and other bastions of intellectual rigor retreated to a complex on Long Island named Cold Spring Harbor. Their support came from the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman fortune working with the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, State and other agencies.

The “science” was not lacking important public supporters. Theodore Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Woodrow Wilson were enthusiastic believers. The theory won approval of Supreme Court justices, leaders in higher education and Nobel Prize winners. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was one of the most vocal adherents. She established the first “birth control” clinic in 1916.

 They believed that “the best” human beings were not having as many children as inferior ones — the foreigners, immigrants, Jews, Blacks, degenerates, the unfit and the “feeble minded.” Sanger said “fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty.” She spoke of the burden of caring for “this dead weight of human waste.” H.G. Wells spoke against “ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens.” Roosevelt said, “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind.” George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind…

…  One must ask, “How in the world did university researchers come to conclusions that defended this outrageous affront to society?” A look back at the research concluded that the researchers adjusted their outcomes to support the theory of those paying for the research. This is not unusual. It is very easy to believe that the settled science regarding climate change is just as suspicious, and indeed may be another example of pseudo-science capturing the imagination of politicians, actors and the media elite who have a desperate need to embrace some “science” which may force us to change the way we live our lives. H. L. Mencken once wrote, “The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it.” [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/feb/18/20070218-100445-1207r/]

Does Biden agree with extremist Stone-Manning that “shirtless child [are] an ‘environmental hazard’” and that “we could improve the [earth] by controlling reproduction”?

Moreover, the Jerusalem Post reported that Biden tapped another apparent eugenicist for his inner circle in its November article “Biden taps Ezekiel Emanuel to coronavirus task force, faces controversy”:

Concerns were raised that Emanuel doesn’t value saving those over the age of 75, with some equating his views to eugenics.

 President-elect Joe Biden has tapped renowned oncologist and bioethicist Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel to sit on his coronavirus task force, despite his controversial views on aging, The Forward has reported.

The controversy stems from an article he wrote in the Atlantic in 2014, where he explained that he would prefer to die at the age of 75, as living past such an age “renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived,” according to The Forward. [https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/biden-taps-ezekiel-emanuel-to-coronavirus-task-force-faces-controversy-648916]

Does Biden agree with extremist Emanuel that the age of 75 “renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death”?

Finally, is it possible that Biden and Francis might in some way support a one-world eugenicist government agenda? 

It appears that Joe Biden and the Globalist Elite are possibly beginning the process for a one-world abortionist eugenicist government (probably modeled on Marxist China program) as Constitutional attorney Robert Barnes reports:

Robert Barnes

@barnes_law

A global tax system is the predicate to a global governmental system.

CNN Breaking News

@cnnbrk

Leaders from the G7 nations agree to establish a 15% global minimum tax, backing the Biden administration’s plan to overhaul the global tax system[https://twitter.com/barnes_law/status/1402314544613969925 and https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1401150844595277829%5D

Might Francis be in on this process? 

Is there Evidence that Francis wants a one-world government? 

Is Francis the biggest hypocrite of our time?

He compares abortion to Nazi eugenics:

“The murder of children. To have an easy life, they get rid of an innocent… Last century, the whole world was scandalised by what the Nazis did to purify the race. Today, we do the same thing but with white gloves.”
[http://www.lifenews.com/2018/06/18/pope-francis-was-right-to-compare-abortion-to-nazi-eugencis/]

But then he promotes the foremost one-world government abortionist eugenicist leaders:

Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to LifeSitenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Francis said he is “gratified” by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which “promote universal access to abortion” according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

In 2015,  LifeSiteNews reported:

Pope Francis has appointed controversial German Professor John Schellnhuber as an ordinary member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences.  Schellnhuber was one of the four presenters of the new encyclical on the environment, Laudato Si’, on Thursday. He is also scheduled to chair a session of a Pontifical Academy for Sciences educational workshop on “Children and Sustainable Development” set for November.”

“… Schellnhuber is also known for his advocacy of a one-world government.  In order to avoid his catastrophic predictions for unchecked climate change.”

“… Schellnhuber is also a full member of the Club of Rome.”

“[T]he Club of Rome in 1972, was one of the starting points for the worldwide attempt to reduce the population by aggressive methods of promoting birth control and the killing of pre-born children.”

 [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/whos-that-one-world-climate-guru-who-helped-present-the-popes-encyclical-at]

Francis is in alliance with the United Nations, the Club of Rome and Schellnhuber in calling for a one-world government. 

On May 9, the New American reported on the “unholy alliance” between the one-world regime globalists and Francis:

Francis said “‘When a supranational common good is clearly identified, it is necessary to have a special authority legally and concordantly constituted capable of facilitating its implementation. We think of the great contemporary challenges of climate change, new forms of slavery and peace,’ his holiness told those gathered to discuss ‘Nation, State, and Nation-State,’ the conference theme.”

“Pope Francis put a pretty fine point on his message, claiming that planetary problems are exacerbated by ‘an excessive demand for sovereignty on the part of States.'”

“… Our only hope for planetary peace and progress is to make room for ‘international organizations’ to develop into governing bodies, supplanting the ‘state interests’ with the will of the United Nations, he stated.”

“… Those people pushing for unlimited access to abortion loathe the Roman Catholic Church and its centuries-long opposition to the murder of children in utero are the very people standing with the head of that church in the fight to kill sovereignty and establish a one-world government.”

“That seemingly bizarre and undeniably unholy alliance should be enough to compel people to question what the underlying goal of the globalists must be.”

“In other words, what sort of government would the pope and pro-abortion advocates find mutually commendable?”
[https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/32245-pope-francis-calls-for-end-of-sovereignty-and-establishment-of-global-government]

Also, apparently in alliance with Francis and the Club of Rome is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) in their attempt to bring about a abortionist eugenicist one-world government:

Ocasio-Cortez is the leading champion of the Green New Deal, in collaboration with a Rockefeller-funded left-wing astroturf advocacy group called the Sunrise Movement [SM]… “

“The Green New Deal is exploiting the popularity of social democratic ideals as sugar coating to disguise the globalists’ poison pill. According to reporting by Inside Philanthropy, institutional funders made up about 55 percent of Sunrise Movement’s 2018 budget, which includes donors like the Rockefeller Family Fund, Wallace Global Fund, and the Winslow Foundation. The Wallace Global Fund was originally founded by former US Vice-President Henry A. Wallace. Winslow is run by Wren Winslow Wirth, who is married to former politician Tim Wirth.[3] SM was launched in April 2017 by six principal co-founders—veterans of the Occupy Movement—who had developed a friendship with Michael Dorsey of the Rockefeller-funded globalist institution, the Club Of Rome; Dorsey  was also a former Sierra Club board member, whom President Barack Obama had appointed to the EPA’s National Advisory Board in 2010 and 2012.”

[http://www.conspiracyschool.com/blog/green-astroturf-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-agent-globalist-conspiracy]

Who is Dorsey who is apparently one of AOC’s major players behind the scenes pulling strings with his Rockefeller connections which are funding Ocasio-Cortez?

The Rockefeller-funded Club of Rome Dorsey “is a recognized expert on global governance and sustainability.”

[https://www.diversegreen.org/people/michael-dorsey/]

It appears that Ocasio-Cortez is a fellow traveler with the abortionist eugenicist one-world agenda of the Club of Rome who promote “birth control and the killing of pre-born children”:

“‘Our planet is going to hit disaster if we don’t turn this ship around and so it’s basically like, there’s a scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult,’ Ocasio-Cortez said while chopping up food in her kitchen during an Instagram live video. ‘And it does lead, I think, young people to have a legitimate question, you know, ‘Is it okay to still have children?'”

[https://www.dailywire.com/news/43880/ocasio-cortez-people-maybe-shouldnt-reproduce-due-ryan-saavedra]

By coincidence it appears that Ocasio-Cortez’s former Chief of Staff Saikat Chakrabarti is a fan of a ally of Hitler:

“Based on a recent clothing choice, Chakrabarti might justifiably be considered a Nazi sympathizer. But really? Well, yes. In his latest love-fest video for AOC, Chakrabarti is sporting a tee-shirt that features a portrait of Subhas Chandra Bose. Not familiar with this former Indian head of state? Here a few facts:”


Also, by coincidence Ocasio-Cortez and her Chief of Staff Chakrabarti happen to be pro-choice like the one time wannabe one-world government abortionist eugenicist leader Adolf Hitler.

As the German Media covered up Hitler’s many eugenic scandals, the Nazi Media proudly promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler’s first acts was to legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler’s next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenicswhich lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Getting back to Francis who appears to be in alliance with Ocasio-Cortez in achieving the goal of the Club of Rome to have a abortionist eugenicist one-world government; we need to remember that Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization”according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Author and visiting lecturer at the University of Illinois Allen Chase wrote that the Francis Vatican hosted Ehrlich was:

“[A]n open and blunt advocate of genocide political policies… Dr. Ehrlich has neither the intellectual right and professional right… to speak for biology in particular and for the scientific community in general. Genocide remains genocide, whether advocated in a Munich beer hall in the 1920 or in a Texas college auditorium in 1967.”
(Counterpunch, “Population Bomb or Bomb the Population?,” April 3, 2019)

The New Atlantis showed the racist implications of Ehrlich’s policies:

“In 1968, Paul Ehrlich wrote in The Population Bomb, ‘I have yet to meet anyone familiar with the situation who thinks India will be self sufficient in food by 1971, if ever’… By 1972-1973, the number of sterilizations in India reached three million per year.”
(The New Atlantis, “The Population Control Holocaust,” By Robert Zubrin, Number 35, Spring 2012, pp. 33-54)

When most people think of eugenics and forced sterilization they think of Nazi Germany, but tragically Francis’s Vatican is hosting and promoting the foremost one-world government abortionist eugenicist leaders of those same policies such as Ehrlich.

The Francis and the Club of Rome agenda for a one-world regime is also Ehrlich’s goal according to Fox News:

“President Obama’s ‘science czar,’ John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, ‘compulsory sterilization,’ and the creation of a ‘Planetary Regime.'”

“… [Holdren propounded this ‘Planetary Regime’ policies in a] textbook he co-authored in 1977, ‘Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,’ a copy of which was obtained by FOXNews.com”

“The 1,000-page course book, which was co-written with environmental activists Paul and Anne Ehrlich.
(Fox News, “Obama’s ‘Science Czar Considered Forced Abortions, Sterilization as Population Growth Solutions,” Published July 21, 2009, Last Update January 27, 2015)

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.SHARESHARECommentssaid…Aqua Jorge Bergoglio has met numerous times with Italian Emma Bonino, former radical politician and perhaps the world’s single most prolific abortion practitioner and advocate since it mainstreamed in the 1970’s. He has praised her numerous times and met with her in extended visits. He has never said anything negative about her or her life’s passion for abortion. He obviously cherishes both her and her work, killing children. That is a simple statement of fact.https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-once-again-praises-notorious-abortionist-emma-bonino-i-have-great-respect-for-her/Recently, a group of about a dozen mothers hiked through Europe from France to meet the “Pope” and beg him permission not to take the Traditional Latin Mass away from themselves and their children. He refused to meet any of them as a group, only one as a representative and the meeting lasted about two minutes.It is clear who and what he is. Most people just find it inconceivable to admit it. The “Pope” supports sodomy, sex perversity, abortion, eugenics, totalitarian leftism … and the destruction of all Sacred Tradition and Dogmas pre-existing Vatican II, as he calls it – “The” Council.Catholics in a state of grace should be inoculated from such anti-Catholic pathogens. We have 2,000 years of Constant Magisterial teaching. If we choose to see, and believe, these deviations need not hold power over our faith.







7:49 AMT said…This is will cuckoo conspiracy insanity, but before I became Catholic I learned that a Luciferian Cult called Theosophy is at the hearts of the UN. If you go on the way back machine and look up Lucis Trust they are a group preparing the world for the manifestation of “the Christ” (who is, according to them, not Jesus).All I know is the antichrist will be the dictator of the one world government and the false prophet will deceive people into worshipping him and getting the mark of the beast. Seeing how Francis is making the Church forget her mission to baptize and teach all nations and instead build a fraternal utopia, take care of the environment and feed the poor he certainly is the prime candidate for false prophet, even friends with all the parasites (so-called elites) agitating for a one world government.

7:57 AM

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this Jorge Bergolio, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? 

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Flashback: Are Francis & Cupich Pro-Abortion like [Biden,] Kaine, Hillary & Hitler Despite Lip Service?

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.com 

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.compeople.com

Biden says Pope Francis told him he’s a ‘good Catholic’TGP: 

TGP: Although Pope Francis Remains Silent 

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide. – The Catholic Monitor comment section

Would Cupich give Hitler Communion since he says Cutting up Babies is Moral Equal, much the same as, Joblessness & Anti-Environmentalism which Hitler fought Against?

Cupich: Was Hitler Pro-Life since he Agreed with many of your & Francis’s Consistent Ethic of Life Stances?

-Updated on November 9, 2017-

Francis and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich appears to be pro-choice like Hillary Clinton’s ex-running mate Catholic Tim Kaine.

Kaine’s ex-running mate Clinton, Francis and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Ironically, it is Kaine, Hillary, Cupich and Francis who appear to resemble Hitler in his pro-choice policies.

As the German Media covered up Hitler’s many scandals, the Nazi Media, also, promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler’s first acts was to legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler’s next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenics which lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Hillary Clinton like Hitler said she supports legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which like Hitler means abortion on demand.

Clinton supports the killing of the 58,000,000 unborn babies aborted in the U.S.A. since 1973.

In the final presidential debate she said she supported even partial-birth abortion. Trump said it best in the debate:

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the womb out of the mother, just prior to the birth of the baby.”

The Clintons, also, followed Hitler in pushing sterilization for unwanted minorities. On March 15, 2016, the left leaning Counterpunch.com, in an article on the Clinton era called “The Clintons Do Haiti: Keep the Natives From Breeding,” said:

“Clintonian population policy in Haiti…revealed in an internal U. S. Agency for International Development report, the fundamental goal of the American government is to keep the natives from breeding…and the establishment of 23 facilities to provide sterilization.”[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/15/the-clintons-in-haiti-keep-the-natives-from-breeding/]

Hillary, again, followed Hitler in supporting eugenics. Like him she thinks the disabled can be killed.

Clinton said she was in “awe” of Nazi admirer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wrote that the disabled “should never be born” and promoted abortion against minorities and “morons” according to the following article by The American Spectator.

On September 22, 2016, The American Spectator in “She is not their champion at the beginning of life” said:

“She promised Planned Parenthood that she will not let concerns about eugenic abortion undermine its gains. When Indiana legislators proposed protection for unborn children diagnosed with disabilities, Hillary blasted it, saying earlier that year that “I will defend a woman’s right to make her own health-care decisions” and “I’ll defend Planned Parenthood against this attacks.”[https://spectator.org/eugenic-hillarys-pitch-to-the-disabled/]

Of course, the Media like the Nazi Media who promoted the pro-choice Hitler, promote the Planned Parenthood eugenic abortion supporting Hillary while they cover up the scandal of the Nazi foundations of Planned Parenthood.

Clinton’s vice presidential running mate “Catholic” Tim Kaine said “My faith is central to everything I do.” He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is “personally opposed” to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has “a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood” according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas.[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/05/tim-kaines-catholic-problem/]

In other words, he like Hitler and Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Pope Francis and Cupich like Kaine are “personally opposed” to abortion, but their actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine they are 100 percent pro-abortion. 

The action records of Cupich and Francis show they are pro-choice (Francis being the first pro-choice Pope in history) who are following in the footsteps of Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis “had done nothing of any substance” to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism “interruption of pregnancy” condemned by Pope John Paul II):

“Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing.”[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Cupich like Francis has made brief references to abortion and done nothing of any substance to address the genocide of unborn babies.

Unfortunately, Cupich and Francis have not just done nothing to help the unborn babies, it appears they promotes abortionists and their anti-life causes.

Francis and Cardinal have acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice.

Francis, like Clinton’s running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Going one step farther than the Pope on the religious side, Cupich even promotes giving Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

While on the policy side, Francis said he is “gratified” by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which “promote universal access to abortion” according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

Francis “removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy” and changed its statues to remove “the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-has-removed-every-single-member-of-the-vatican-pro-life-academ]

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy’s leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy’s “forgotten greats.” She performed illegal abortions and worked “with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions” according to Lifenews.com. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/2016-the-year-pope-francis-finally-showed-his-hand]

Pope Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

The Chicago Cardinal Cupich has gone farther than Francis, in terms of being sacrilegious, in saying on Face the Nation in 2014 that he would give Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

Would Cupich give Hitler, who was a pro-abortion politician, Holy Communion since the Nazi dictator agreed with many of what he and Francis call their consistent ethic of life stances?

The Cardinal explicitly said cutting up babies is, morally equal, much the same as, joblessness and anti-environmentalism.

Fighting joblessness, anti-environmentalism and other secular issues are the new euphemism or cognitive re-definition of pro-life.

The progressive pro-Francis magazine Commonwealth reported that the current Pope in an article titled “How Pope Francis Refamed the Politics of Being ‘Prolife'” now says:

Being “prolife” is is not a “single-issue” and, also, means ”’the environment devastated by man’s predatory relationship with nature’… undocumented immigrants and unemployed workers.”
(Commonwealth, By John Gehring, September 13, 2017)

In 2015, the Chicago Cardinal sounded like a Nazi sympathizer when he compared the genocide of unborn babies to joblessness. He compared the “Planned Parenthood grisly traffic in aborted babies body parts to… joblessness and a broken immigration system.”
(“Leftist CDL Cupich In Running to Chair US Bishops’ Pro-Life Committee,” Church Militant, October 24, 2017)

By Cupich’s Nazi sympathizer-like reasoning then Hitler’s grisly death camp genocide should be conterbalanced by the fact that the Nazis government reduced unemployment from six million to one million and was one of the first to create environmental protection laws.

Francis and the Cardinal in their statements down play the abortion genocide while making climate change a top priority and appear to, also, equate environmentalism (and even tobacco smoking which was just outlawed in the Vatican) with having a consistent ethic life position.

By their reasoning Hitler was pro-life since it’s not a single issue and he agreed with many of Pope Francis’s consistent ethic of life stances.

Hitler had a “stance against Tobacco use” and the “Nazi’s were the first to create environmental protection laws in history” according to the europeanknights project.com. (12 Things You We’re Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi (NSDAP) Germany,” January 13, 2017)

Lifesitenews.com pointed out that Cupich said abortion “is a ‘controversial issue.’ It needs to be ‘put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.'”

This statement sounds like something similar to what a Nazi sympathizer would say:

The Jewish genocide is a “controversial issue,” it needs to be put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.

The pro-life news service responding to the Chicago Cardinal’s statement said:

“Your Eminence, abortion is immoral because it kills… Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t fret about train prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life.”
(“Cardinal Cupich shows his priorities in responses to two different tragedies,” November 8, 2017, Lifesitenews.com)

Why is the Media, and even most of the Catholic Media, covering up that Pope Francis and Cupich, in terms of their actions, appears to be pro-choice like Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

Comments

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide.

10:26 AM

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

SEARCH

Flashback: Are Francis & Cupich Pro-Abortion like [Biden,] Kaine, Hillary & Hitler Despite Lip Service?

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.com 

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.compeople.com

Biden says Pope Francis told him he’s a ‘good Catholic’TGP: 

TGP: Although Pope Francis Remains Silent 

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Flashback: Are Francis & Cupich Pro-Abortion like [Biden,] Kaine, Hillary & Hitler Despite Lip Service?

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.com 

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.compeople.com

Biden says Pope Francis told him he’s a ‘good Catholic’TGP: 

TGP: Although Pope Francis Remains Silent 

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide. – The Catholic Monitor comment section

Would Cupich give Hitler Communion since he says Cutting up Babies is Moral Equal, much the same as, Joblessness & Anti-Environmentalism which Hitler fought Against?

Cupich: Was Hitler Pro-Life since he Agreed with many of your & Francis’s Consistent Ethic of Life Stances?

-Updated on November 9, 2017-

Francis and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich appears to be pro-choice like Hillary Clinton’s ex-running mate Catholic Tim Kaine.

Kaine’s ex-running mate Clinton, Francis and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Ironically, it is Kaine, Hillary, Cupich and Francis who appear to resemble Hitler in his pro-choice policies.

As the German Media covered up Hitler’s many scandals, the Nazi Media, also, promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler’s first acts was to legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler’s next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenics which lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Hillary Clinton like Hitler said she supports legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which like Hitler means abortion on demand.

Clinton supports the killing of the 58,000,000 unborn babies aborted in the U.S.A. since 1973.

In the final presidential debate she said she supported even partial-birth abortion. Trump said it best in the debate:

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the womb out of the mother, just prior to the birth of the baby.”

The Clintons, also, followed Hitler in pushing sterilization for unwanted minorities. On March 15, 2016, the left leaning Counterpunch.com, in an article on the Clinton era called “The Clintons Do Haiti: Keep the Natives From Breeding,” said:

“Clintonian population policy in Haiti…revealed in an internal U. S. Agency for International Development report, the fundamental goal of the American government is to keep the natives from breeding…and the establishment of 23 facilities to provide sterilization.”[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/15/the-clintons-in-haiti-keep-the-natives-from-breeding/]

Hillary, again, followed Hitler in supporting eugenics. Like him she thinks the disabled can be killed.

Clinton said she was in “awe” of Nazi admirer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wrote that the disabled “should never be born” and promoted abortion against minorities and “morons” according to the following article by The American Spectator.

On September 22, 2016, The American Spectator in “She is not their champion at the beginning of life” said:

“She promised Planned Parenthood that she will not let concerns about eugenic abortion undermine its gains. When Indiana legislators proposed protection for unborn children diagnosed with disabilities, Hillary blasted it, saying earlier that year that “I will defend a woman’s right to make her own health-care decisions” and “I’ll defend Planned Parenthood against this attacks.”[https://spectator.org/eugenic-hillarys-pitch-to-the-disabled/]

Of course, the Media like the Nazi Media who promoted the pro-choice Hitler, promote the Planned Parenthood eugenic abortion supporting Hillary while they cover up the scandal of the Nazi foundations of Planned Parenthood.

Clinton’s vice presidential running mate “Catholic” Tim Kaine said “My faith is central to everything I do.” He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is “personally opposed” to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has “a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood” according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas.[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/05/tim-kaines-catholic-problem/]

In other words, he like Hitler and Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Pope Francis and Cupich like Kaine are “personally opposed” to abortion, but their actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine they are 100 percent pro-abortion. 

The action records of Cupich and Francis show they are pro-choice (Francis being the first pro-choice Pope in history) who are following in the footsteps of Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis “had done nothing of any substance” to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism “interruption of pregnancy” condemned by Pope John Paul II):

“Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing.”[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Cupich like Francis has made brief references to abortion and done nothing of any substance to address the genocide of unborn babies.

Unfortunately, Cupich and Francis have not just done nothing to help the unborn babies, it appears they promotes abortionists and their anti-life causes.

Francis and Cardinal have acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice.

Francis, like Clinton’s running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Going one step farther than the Pope on the religious side, Cupich even promotes giving Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

While on the policy side, Francis said he is “gratified” by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which “promote universal access to abortion” according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

Francis “removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy” and changed its statues to remove “the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-has-removed-every-single-member-of-the-vatican-pro-life-academ]

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy’s leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy’s “forgotten greats.” She performed illegal abortions and worked “with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions” according to Lifenews.com. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/2016-the-year-pope-francis-finally-showed-his-hand]

Pope Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

The Chicago Cardinal Cupich has gone farther than Francis, in terms of being sacrilegious, in saying on Face the Nation in 2014 that he would give Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

Would Cupich give Hitler, who was a pro-abortion politician, Holy Communion since the Nazi dictator agreed with many of what he and Francis call their consistent ethic of life stances?

The Cardinal explicitly said cutting up babies is, morally equal, much the same as, joblessness and anti-environmentalism.

Fighting joblessness, anti-environmentalism and other secular issues are the new euphemism or cognitive re-definition of pro-life.

The progressive pro-Francis magazine Commonwealth reported that the current Pope in an article titled “How Pope Francis Refamed the Politics of Being ‘Prolife'” now says:

Being “prolife” is is not a “single-issue” and, also, means ”’the environment devastated by man’s predatory relationship with nature’… undocumented immigrants and unemployed workers.”
(Commonwealth, By John Gehring, September 13, 2017)

In 2015, the Chicago Cardinal sounded like a Nazi sympathizer when he compared the genocide of unborn babies to joblessness. He compared the “Planned Parenthood grisly traffic in aborted babies body parts to… joblessness and a broken immigration system.”
(“Leftist CDL Cupich In Running to Chair US Bishops’ Pro-Life Committee,” Church Militant, October 24, 2017)

By Cupich’s Nazi sympathizer-like reasoning then Hitler’s grisly death camp genocide should be conterbalanced by the fact that the Nazis government reduced unemployment from six million to one million and was one of the first to create environmental protection laws.

Francis and the Cardinal in their statements down play the abortion genocide while making climate change a top priority and appear to, also, equate environmentalism (and even tobacco smoking which was just outlawed in the Vatican) with having a consistent ethic life position.

By their reasoning Hitler was pro-life since it’s not a single issue and he agreed with many of Pope Francis’s consistent ethic of life stances.

Hitler had a “stance against Tobacco use” and the “Nazi’s were the first to create environmental protection laws in history” according to the europeanknights project.com. (12 Things You We’re Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi (NSDAP) Germany,” January 13, 2017)

Lifesitenews.com pointed out that Cupich said abortion “is a ‘controversial issue.’ It needs to be ‘put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.'”

This statement sounds like something similar to what a Nazi sympathizer would say:

The Jewish genocide is a “controversial issue,” it needs to be put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.

The pro-life news service responding to the Chicago Cardinal’s statement said:

“Your Eminence, abortion is immoral because it kills… Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t fret about train prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life.”
(“Cardinal Cupich shows his priorities in responses to two different tragedies,” November 8, 2017, Lifesitenews.com)

Why is the Media, and even most of the Catholic Media, covering up that Pope Francis and Cupich, in terms of their actions, appears to be pro-choice like Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

Comments

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide.

10:26 AM

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Flashback: Are Francis & Cupich Pro-Abortion like [Biden,] Kaine, Hillary & Hitler Despite Lip Service?

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.com 

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.compeople.com

Biden says Pope Francis told him he’s a ‘good Catholic’TGP: 

TGP: Although Pope Francis Remains Silent 

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide. – The Catholic Monitor comment section

Would Cupich give Hitler Communion since he says Cutting up Babies is Moral Equal, much the same as, Joblessness & Anti-Environmentalism which Hitler fought Against?

Cupich: Was Hitler Pro-Life since he Agreed with many of your & Francis’s Consistent Ethic of Life Stances?

-Updated on November 9, 2017-

Francis and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich appears to be pro-choice like Hillary Clinton’s ex-running mate Catholic Tim Kaine.

Kaine’s ex-running mate Clinton, Francis and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Ironically, it is Kaine, Hillary, Cupich and Francis who appear to resemble Hitler in his pro-choice policies.

As the German Media covered up Hitler’s many scandals, the Nazi Media, also, promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler’s first acts was to legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler’s next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenics which lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Hillary Clinton like Hitler said she supports legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which like Hitler means abortion on demand.

Clinton supports the killing of the 58,000,000 unborn babies aborted in the U.S.A. since 1973.

In the final presidential debate she said she supported even partial-birth abortion. Trump said it best in the debate:

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the womb out of the mother, just prior to the birth of the baby.”

The Clintons, also, followed Hitler in pushing sterilization for unwanted minorities. On March 15, 2016, the left leaning Counterpunch.com, in an article on the Clinton era called “The Clintons Do Haiti: Keep the Natives From Breeding,” said:

“Clintonian population policy in Haiti…revealed in an internal U. S. Agency for International Development report, the fundamental goal of the American government is to keep the natives from breeding…and the establishment of 23 facilities to provide sterilization.”[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/15/the-clintons-in-haiti-keep-the-natives-from-breeding/]

Hillary, again, followed Hitler in supporting eugenics. Like him she thinks the disabled can be killed.

Clinton said she was in “awe” of Nazi admirer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wrote that the disabled “should never be born” and promoted abortion against minorities and “morons” according to the following article by The American Spectator.

On September 22, 2016, The American Spectator in “She is not their champion at the beginning of life” said:

“She promised Planned Parenthood that she will not let concerns about eugenic abortion undermine its gains. When Indiana legislators proposed protection for unborn children diagnosed with disabilities, Hillary blasted it, saying earlier that year that “I will defend a woman’s right to make her own health-care decisions” and “I’ll defend Planned Parenthood against this attacks.”[https://spectator.org/eugenic-hillarys-pitch-to-the-disabled/]

Of course, the Media like the Nazi Media who promoted the pro-choice Hitler, promote the Planned Parenthood eugenic abortion supporting Hillary while they cover up the scandal of the Nazi foundations of Planned Parenthood.

Clinton’s vice presidential running mate “Catholic” Tim Kaine said “My faith is central to everything I do.” He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is “personally opposed” to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has “a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood” according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas.[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/05/tim-kaines-catholic-problem/]

In other words, he like Hitler and Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Pope Francis and Cupich like Kaine are “personally opposed” to abortion, but their actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine they are 100 percent pro-abortion. 

The action records of Cupich and Francis show they are pro-choice (Francis being the first pro-choice Pope in history) who are following in the footsteps of Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis “had done nothing of any substance” to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism “interruption of pregnancy” condemned by Pope John Paul II):

“Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing.”[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Cupich like Francis has made brief references to abortion and done nothing of any substance to address the genocide of unborn babies.

Unfortunately, Cupich and Francis have not just done nothing to help the unborn babies, it appears they promotes abortionists and their anti-life causes.

Francis and Cardinal have acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice.

Francis, like Clinton’s running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Going one step farther than the Pope on the religious side, Cupich even promotes giving Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

While on the policy side, Francis said he is “gratified” by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which “promote universal access to abortion” according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

Francis “removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy” and changed its statues to remove “the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-has-removed-every-single-member-of-the-vatican-pro-life-academ]

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy’s leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy’s “forgotten greats.” She performed illegal abortions and worked “with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions” according to Lifenews.com. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/2016-the-year-pope-francis-finally-showed-his-hand]

Pope Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

The Chicago Cardinal Cupich has gone farther than Francis, in terms of being sacrilegious, in saying on Face the Nation in 2014 that he would give Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

Would Cupich give Hitler, who was a pro-abortion politician, Holy Communion since the Nazi dictator agreed with many of what he and Francis call their consistent ethic of life stances?

The Cardinal explicitly said cutting up babies is, morally equal, much the same as, joblessness and anti-environmentalism.

Fighting joblessness, anti-environmentalism and other secular issues are the new euphemism or cognitive re-definition of pro-life.

The progressive pro-Francis magazine Commonwealth reported that the current Pope in an article titled “How Pope Francis Refamed the Politics of Being ‘Prolife'” now says:

Being “prolife” is is not a “single-issue” and, also, means ”’the environment devastated by man’s predatory relationship with nature’… undocumented immigrants and unemployed workers.”
(Commonwealth, By John Gehring, September 13, 2017)

In 2015, the Chicago Cardinal sounded like a Nazi sympathizer when he compared the genocide of unborn babies to joblessness. He compared the “Planned Parenthood grisly traffic in aborted babies body parts to… joblessness and a broken immigration system.”
(“Leftist CDL Cupich In Running to Chair US Bishops’ Pro-Life Committee,” Church Militant, October 24, 2017)

By Cupich’s Nazi sympathizer-like reasoning then Hitler’s grisly death camp genocide should be conterbalanced by the fact that the Nazis government reduced unemployment from six million to one million and was one of the first to create environmental protection laws.

Francis and the Cardinal in their statements down play the abortion genocide while making climate change a top priority and appear to, also, equate environmentalism (and even tobacco smoking which was just outlawed in the Vatican) with having a consistent ethic life position.

By their reasoning Hitler was pro-life since it’s not a single issue and he agreed with many of Pope Francis’s consistent ethic of life stances.

Hitler had a “stance against Tobacco use” and the “Nazi’s were the first to create environmental protection laws in history” according to the europeanknights project.com. (12 Things You We’re Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi (NSDAP) Germany,” January 13, 2017)

Lifesitenews.com pointed out that Cupich said abortion “is a ‘controversial issue.’ It needs to be ‘put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.'”

This statement sounds like something similar to what a Nazi sympathizer would say:

The Jewish genocide is a “controversial issue,” it needs to be put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.

The pro-life news service responding to the Chicago Cardinal’s statement said:

“Your Eminence, abortion is immoral because it kills… Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t fret about train prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life.”
(“Cardinal Cupich shows his priorities in responses to two different tragedies,” November 8, 2017, Lifesitenews.com)

Why is the Media, and even most of the Catholic Media, covering up that Pope Francis and Cupich, in terms of their actions, appears to be pro-choice like Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

Comments

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide.

10:26 AM

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide. – The Catholic Monitor comment section

Would Cupich give Hitler Communion since he says Cutting up Babies is Moral Equal, much the same as, Joblessness & Anti-Environmentalism which Hitler fought Against?

Cupich: Was Hitler Pro-Life since he Agreed with many of your & Francis’s Consistent Ethic of Life Stances?

-Updated on November 9, 2017-

Francis and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich appears to be pro-choice like Hillary Clinton’s ex-running mate Catholic Tim Kaine.

Kaine’s ex-running mate Clinton, Francis and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Ironically, it is Kaine, Hillary, Cupich and Francis who appear to resemble Hitler in his pro-choice policies.

As the German Media covered up Hitler’s many scandals, the Nazi Media, also, promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler’s first acts was to legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler’s next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenics which lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Hillary Clinton like Hitler said she supports legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which like Hitler means abortion on demand.

Clinton supports the killing of the 58,000,000 unborn babies aborted in the U.S.A. since 1973.

In the final presidential debate she said she supported even partial-birth abortion. Trump said it best in the debate:

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the womb out of the mother, just prior to the birth of the baby.”

The Clintons, also, followed Hitler in pushing sterilization for unwanted minorities. On March 15, 2016, the left leaning Counterpunch.com, in an article on the Clinton era called “The Clintons Do Haiti: Keep the Natives From Breeding,” said:

“Clintonian population policy in Haiti…revealed in an internal U. S. Agency for International Development report, the fundamental goal of the American government is to keep the natives from breeding…and the establishment of 23 facilities to provide sterilization.”[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/15/the-clintons-in-haiti-keep-the-natives-from-breeding/]

Hillary, again, followed Hitler in supporting eugenics. Like him she thinks the disabled can be killed.

Clinton said she was in “awe” of Nazi admirer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wrote that the disabled “should never be born” and promoted abortion against minorities and “morons” according to the following article by The American Spectator.

On September 22, 2016, The American Spectator in “She is not their champion at the beginning of life” said:

“She promised Planned Parenthood that she will not let concerns about eugenic abortion undermine its gains. When Indiana legislators proposed protection for unborn children diagnosed with disabilities, Hillary blasted it, saying earlier that year that “I will defend a woman’s right to make her own health-care decisions” and “I’ll defend Planned Parenthood against this attacks.”[https://spectator.org/eugenic-hillarys-pitch-to-the-disabled/]

Of course, the Media like the Nazi Media who promoted the pro-choice Hitler, promote the Planned Parenthood eugenic abortion supporting Hillary while they cover up the scandal of the Nazi foundations of Planned Parenthood.

Clinton’s vice presidential running mate “Catholic” Tim Kaine said “My faith is central to everything I do.” He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is “personally opposed” to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has “a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood” according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas.[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/05/tim-kaines-catholic-problem/]

In other words, he like Hitler and Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Pope Francis and Cupich like Kaine are “personally opposed” to abortion, but their actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine they are 100 percent pro-abortion. 

The action records of Cupich and Francis show they are pro-choice (Francis being the first pro-choice Pope in history) who are following in the footsteps of Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis “had done nothing of any substance” to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism “interruption of pregnancy” condemned by Pope John Paul II):

“Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing.”[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Cupich like Francis has made brief references to abortion and done nothing of any substance to address the genocide of unborn babies.

Unfortunately, Cupich and Francis have not just done nothing to help the unborn babies, it appears they promotes abortionists and their anti-life causes.

Francis and Cardinal have acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice.

Francis, like Clinton’s running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Going one step farther than the Pope on the religious side, Cupich even promotes giving Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

While on the policy side, Francis said he is “gratified” by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which “promote universal access to abortion” according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

Francis “removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy” and changed its statues to remove “the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-has-removed-every-single-member-of-the-vatican-pro-life-academ]

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy’s leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy’s “forgotten greats.” She performed illegal abortions and worked “with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions” according to Lifenews.com. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/2016-the-year-pope-francis-finally-showed-his-hand]

Pope Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

The Chicago Cardinal Cupich has gone farther than Francis, in terms of being sacrilegious, in saying on Face the Nation in 2014 that he would give Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

Would Cupich give Hitler, who was a pro-abortion politician, Holy Communion since the Nazi dictator agreed with many of what he and Francis call their consistent ethic of life stances?

The Cardinal explicitly said cutting up babies is, morally equal, much the same as, joblessness and anti-environmentalism.

Fighting joblessness, anti-environmentalism and other secular issues are the new euphemism or cognitive re-definition of pro-life.

The progressive pro-Francis magazine Commonwealth reported that the current Pope in an article titled “How Pope Francis Refamed the Politics of Being ‘Prolife'” now says:

Being “prolife” is is not a “single-issue” and, also, means ”’the environment devastated by man’s predatory relationship with nature’… undocumented immigrants and unemployed workers.”
(Commonwealth, By John Gehring, September 13, 2017)

In 2015, the Chicago Cardinal sounded like a Nazi sympathizer when he compared the genocide of unborn babies to joblessness. He compared the “Planned Parenthood grisly traffic in aborted babies body parts to… joblessness and a broken immigration system.”
(“Leftist CDL Cupich In Running to Chair US Bishops’ Pro-Life Committee,” Church Militant, October 24, 2017)

By Cupich’s Nazi sympathizer-like reasoning then Hitler’s grisly death camp genocide should be conterbalanced by the fact that the Nazis government reduced unemployment from six million to one million and was one of the first to create environmental protection laws.

Francis and the Cardinal in their statements down play the abortion genocide while making climate change a top priority and appear to, also, equate environmentalism (and even tobacco smoking which was just outlawed in the Vatican) with having a consistent ethic life position.

By their reasoning Hitler was pro-life since it’s not a single issue and he agreed with many of Pope Francis’s consistent ethic of life stances.

Hitler had a “stance against Tobacco use” and the “Nazi’s were the first to create environmental protection laws in history” according to the europeanknights project.com. (12 Things You We’re Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi (NSDAP) Germany,” January 13, 2017)

Lifesitenews.com pointed out that Cupich said abortion “is a ‘controversial issue.’ It needs to be ‘put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.'”

This statement sounds like something similar to what a Nazi sympathizer would say:

The Jewish genocide is a “controversial issue,” it needs to be put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.

The pro-life news service responding to the Chicago Cardinal’s statement said:

“Your Eminence, abortion is immoral because it kills… Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t fret about train prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life.”
(“Cardinal Cupich shows his priorities in responses to two different tragedies,” November 8, 2017, Lifesitenews.com)

Why is the Media, and even most of the Catholic Media, covering up that Pope Francis and Cupich, in terms of their actions, appears to be pro-choice like Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

Comments

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide.

10:26 AM

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Flashback: Are Francis & Cupich Pro-Abortion like [Biden,] Kaine, Hillary & Hitler Despite Lip Service?

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.com 

Pope Francis Congratulates Joe Biden | PEOPLE.compeople.com

Biden says Pope Francis told him he’s a ‘good Catholic’TGP: 

TGP: Although Pope Francis Remains Silent 

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide. – The Catholic Monitor comment section

Would Cupich give Hitler Communion since he says Cutting up Babies is Moral Equal, much the same as, Joblessness & Anti-Environmentalism which Hitler fought Against?

Cupich: Was Hitler Pro-Life since he Agreed with many of your & Francis’s Consistent Ethic of Life Stances?

-Updated on November 9, 2017-

Francis and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich appears to be pro-choice like Hillary Clinton’s ex-running mate Catholic Tim Kaine.

Kaine’s ex-running mate Clinton, Francis and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Ironically, it is Kaine, Hillary, Cupich and Francis who appear to resemble Hitler in his pro-choice policies.

As the German Media covered up Hitler’s many scandals, the Nazi Media, also, promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler’s first acts was to legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler’s next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenics which lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Hillary Clinton like Hitler said she supports legalize abortion for the “health of the mother” which like Hitler means abortion on demand.

Clinton supports the killing of the 58,000,000 unborn babies aborted in the U.S.A. since 1973.

In the final presidential debate she said she supported even partial-birth abortion. Trump said it best in the debate:

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the womb out of the mother, just prior to the birth of the baby.”

The Clintons, also, followed Hitler in pushing sterilization for unwanted minorities. On March 15, 2016, the left leaning Counterpunch.com, in an article on the Clinton era called “The Clintons Do Haiti: Keep the Natives From Breeding,” said:

“Clintonian population policy in Haiti…revealed in an internal U. S. Agency for International Development report, the fundamental goal of the American government is to keep the natives from breeding…and the establishment of 23 facilities to provide sterilization.”[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/15/the-clintons-in-haiti-keep-the-natives-from-breeding/]

Hillary, again, followed Hitler in supporting eugenics. Like him she thinks the disabled can be killed.

Clinton said she was in “awe” of Nazi admirer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wrote that the disabled “should never be born” and promoted abortion against minorities and “morons” according to the following article by The American Spectator.

On September 22, 2016, The American Spectator in “She is not their champion at the beginning of life” said:

“She promised Planned Parenthood that she will not let concerns about eugenic abortion undermine its gains. When Indiana legislators proposed protection for unborn children diagnosed with disabilities, Hillary blasted it, saying earlier that year that “I will defend a woman’s right to make her own health-care decisions” and “I’ll defend Planned Parenthood against this attacks.”[https://spectator.org/eugenic-hillarys-pitch-to-the-disabled/]

Of course, the Media like the Nazi Media who promoted the pro-choice Hitler, promote the Planned Parenthood eugenic abortion supporting Hillary while they cover up the scandal of the Nazi foundations of Planned Parenthood.

Clinton’s vice presidential running mate “Catholic” Tim Kaine said “My faith is central to everything I do.” He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is “personally opposed” to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has “a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood” according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas.[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/05/tim-kaines-catholic-problem/]

In other words, he like Hitler and Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Pope Francis and Cupich like Kaine are “personally opposed” to abortion, but their actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine they are 100 percent pro-abortion. 

The action records of Cupich and Francis show they are pro-choice (Francis being the first pro-choice Pope in history) who are following in the footsteps of Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis “had done nothing of any substance” to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism “interruption of pregnancy” condemned by Pope John Paul II):

“Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing.”[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Cupich like Francis has made brief references to abortion and done nothing of any substance to address the genocide of unborn babies.

Unfortunately, Cupich and Francis have not just done nothing to help the unborn babies, it appears they promotes abortionists and their anti-life causes.

Francis and Cardinal have acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice.

Francis, like Clinton’s running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Going one step farther than the Pope on the religious side, Cupich even promotes giving Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

While on the policy side, Francis said he is “gratified” by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which “promote universal access to abortion” according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

Francis “removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy” and changed its statues to remove “the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-has-removed-every-single-member-of-the-vatican-pro-life-academ]

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy’s leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy’s “forgotten greats.” She performed illegal abortions and worked “with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions” according to Lifenews.com. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/2016-the-year-pope-francis-finally-showed-his-hand]

Pope Francis’s Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has “called for forced abortion and mass sterilization” according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

The Chicago Cardinal Cupich has gone farther than Francis, in terms of being sacrilegious, in saying on Face the Nation in 2014 that he would give Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

Would Cupich give Hitler, who was a pro-abortion politician, Holy Communion since the Nazi dictator agreed with many of what he and Francis call their consistent ethic of life stances?

The Cardinal explicitly said cutting up babies is, morally equal, much the same as, joblessness and anti-environmentalism.

Fighting joblessness, anti-environmentalism and other secular issues are the new euphemism or cognitive re-definition of pro-life.

The progressive pro-Francis magazine Commonwealth reported that the current Pope in an article titled “How Pope Francis Refamed the Politics of Being ‘Prolife'” now says:

Being “prolife” is is not a “single-issue” and, also, means ”’the environment devastated by man’s predatory relationship with nature’… undocumented immigrants and unemployed workers.”
(Commonwealth, By John Gehring, September 13, 2017)

In 2015, the Chicago Cardinal sounded like a Nazi sympathizer when he compared the genocide of unborn babies to joblessness. He compared the “Planned Parenthood grisly traffic in aborted babies body parts to… joblessness and a broken immigration system.”
(“Leftist CDL Cupich In Running to Chair US Bishops’ Pro-Life Committee,” Church Militant, October 24, 2017)

By Cupich’s Nazi sympathizer-like reasoning then Hitler’s grisly death camp genocide should be conterbalanced by the fact that the Nazis government reduced unemployment from six million to one million and was one of the first to create environmental protection laws.

Francis and the Cardinal in their statements down play the abortion genocide while making climate change a top priority and appear to, also, equate environmentalism (and even tobacco smoking which was just outlawed in the Vatican) with having a consistent ethic life position.

By their reasoning Hitler was pro-life since it’s not a single issue and he agreed with many of Pope Francis’s consistent ethic of life stances.

Hitler had a “stance against Tobacco use” and the “Nazi’s were the first to create environmental protection laws in history” according to the europeanknights project.com. (12 Things You We’re Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi (NSDAP) Germany,” January 13, 2017)

Lifesitenews.com pointed out that Cupich said abortion “is a ‘controversial issue.’ It needs to be ‘put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.'”

This statement sounds like something similar to what a Nazi sympathizer would say:

The Jewish genocide is a “controversial issue,” it needs to be put behind us so the government can focus on it’s budget.

The pro-life news service responding to the Chicago Cardinal’s statement said:

“Your Eminence, abortion is immoral because it kills… Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t fret about train prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life.”
(“Cardinal Cupich shows his priorities in responses to two different tragedies,” November 8, 2017, Lifesitenews.com)

Why is the Media, and even most of the Catholic Media, covering up that Pope Francis and Cupich, in terms of their actions, appears to be pro-choice like Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

Comments

Justina said…

Thank you for highlighting this vital theme. How long will it take for people to recognize that telling us not to “breed like rabbits” wasn’t simply one inconsiderate remark on the part of this pope, but rather, represents the tip of the iceberg where a eugenics mentality is concerned? When will people realize that even a pope can’t “make things Catholic” just by saying them, and that we cannot, without serious risk to our sanity and our souls, go on pretending that much of what this man says is “Catholic” in any way, shape, or form?

9:10 AM

Justina said…

P.S. The derogatory term “rabbits” denoting less-than-fully-valued human beings, by the way, has an interesting history in this regard. Pope Francis is far from the first one to employ it. Google “Ravensbruck” along with this word, if you aren’t familiar with the standard usage already.

9:19 AM

Regan Wick said…

“Let us not forget that today’s problem of refugees and migrants is the greatest tragedy after that of the Second World War.” – Francis

No mention of the millions of murders in the womb.

11:10 AM

Theranter said…

“Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?”

He is, but due to his position, he is far more dangerous. What more proof does one need than the things in your well done article? 

I was fairly certain he was a population-controller, but when he disbanded the Pontifical Academy for Life, thus ousting some of the most brilliant and faithful people alive on the subject of life at all stages, I knew he was not just a population controller, but also has an inherently evil agenda. 

I can only hope and pray enough women see through his thinly-veiled hatred of them, and collectively stand up and say “enough!”

5:24 AM

Viva Cristo Rey said…

It’s over a BILLION murdered by abortion in the last 50 years world wide.

10:26 AM

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The United States of Freemasonry

 David L. Gray June 23, 2022 

The USCCB vs. Freemasonry & the Modern Kulturkampf

Back on September 20, 2011, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), with then Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of New York, serving as its President, analyzed the decision by President Barack Obama’s Department of Justice to withdraw from defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Instead, the USCCB observed that the Obama administration sought to turn and attack the Act’s constitutionality, which would “precipitate a national conflict between church and state of enormous proportions and to the detriment of both institutions.” The following year, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the Catholic Bishops of the United States during the Ad Limina Rome, saying:

Here once more we see the need for an engaged, articulate, and well-formed Catholic laity endowed with a strong critical sense vis-à-vis the dominant culture and with the courage to counter a reductive secularism that would delegitimize the Church’s participation in public debate about the issues which are determining the future of American society…

In this regard, I would mention with appreciation your efforts to maintain contacts with Catholics involved in political life and to help them understand their personal responsibility to offer public witness to their faith, especially with regard to the great moral issues of our time: respect for God’s gift of life, the protection of human dignity and the promotion of authentic human rights.

This effort by the USCCB gave birth to the Fortnight for Freedom in 2012, which began on June 21 and ended on July 4. Despite religious freedom being more under attack today and the conflict between the Catholic Church and the state being even more caustic than it was a decade ago, the USCCB has moved to downgrade the Fortnight for Freedom to being just a Religious Freedom Week (June 22 – 29).

How shall we understand what is going on and why we are still here in this fight? The most helpful and prophetic document that the Catholic Church has ever promulgated in this regard is Custodi Di Quella Fede, by Pope Leo XIII (1892). which summarized the fruits and triumphs of the Masonic Program through the Kulturkampf (i.e., culture war). Yet, before I bring us up to date, allow me to first highlight how the United States found itself in this position where its Founding Fathers established the new country not on the principles of any expression of Christianity, but on the principles of Freemasonry (namely, dogmatic indifferentism).

The United States was Never a Christian Nation

The severe hostility between church and state in the United States of America today (and ever-growing) was the intentional outcome of those who were the prime influencers in writing the founding documents of the United States of America. The written evidence on record unarguably affirms that the U.S.A. was built on the promotion of indifferentism (primarily freedom from religion). This most basic principle is learned by the Entered Apprentice in the first lecture after the degree work has been completed. He is given a piece of chalk and is taught that he has the free exercise to draw the lines by which he will live his wife within the bounds and limits of the moral law of Freemasonry and that no one can prohibit him from that right.

Yet, those among us who romanticize and opinionate about the United States being birthed as a Christian nation and/or being founded on Biblical principles, claim such things without being able to point to even one explicitly Christian principle or Biblical proof-text that can be found in either 1776 Declaration of the Independence, the 1789 Bill of Rights, or the 1789 Constitution of the United States.

The reason why this proof must be explicit in nature, rather than merely implied or assumed, is because we have on record many founding documents and constitutions of nations from which we could assert that these nations were founded as Christian nations or were built on Biblical principles. The standard of knowing whether a nation was founded on Christian and/or Biblical principles has already been established by at least forty-one constitutions that explicitly name their state church. Included in that group are four constitutions that explicitly name the Catholic Church (Liechtenstein, Argentina, Costa Rica, Malta, Samoa) as their state Church, three constitutions that include the name of Jesus (Ireland, Fiji, and Sweden), three constitutions that mention the Holy Trinity in its text (Ireland, Greece, and Samoa), and four constitutions that includes the name ‘Allah’ (Kuwait, Pakistan, Mauritania, and Indonesia).

The immediate uncritical response to this fact would be to tender the fact that some of these aforementioned constitutions and amendments are younger than the Constitution of the United States of America; as if being the earliest constitution of its type somehow precluded the founders of the United States from making any sort of explicit Christian declaration in any of their founding documents. Even if we could give an allowance to such a preclusion, the last amendment to the Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1992, which is younger than only thirteen of the forty-one non-disestablished constitutions. Meaning that, since its ratification on June 21, 1788, the Constitution of the United States of America has been amended twenty-seven times without ever explicitly affirming or declaring the country to be of any particular religious belief whatsoever; even at the minimum of constitutionally setting aside just one holy day to observe nationally.

The Myth of the Creator God

At this point, one might tender as evidence of America being a Christian nation, one line from the revolutionary Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” That the Founding Fathers spoke of an agency of God (creation) is clear and explicit. To further posit from there that they were speaking of the Triune God (that is, the true God) is odd, to say the least. None of the monotheistic religions speak well of God by merely speaking about Him according to one of His works. For God is more than His agency; He is more than creator; He is all in all, He is Holy, He is the Lord of Hosts, He is full of glory, He is judge, He is advocate, He is King, and so much more. No rightly formed Chrisitan would ever speak of God as Creator only.

On the contrary, this sentence from the Declaration of Independence is not evidence of any sort of Chrisitan influence on the revolution or of the Bible being a source document that the drafters gleaned from. Rather, it is just one piece in a vast body of compelling evidence of the most pervasive and influential ideology of the day making its intentions known. That is to say, that sentence in question was the first of many insertions by the Freemasons in the United States of America’s revolutionary and governance documents which clearly let the world know that they had just taken a whole nation as their own.

Since its organization in 1717 as a fraternal religion, Freemasonry has always deigned to never mention the sacred name of God, but only speak of Him as the Creator, or more specifically as the Grand Architect of the Universe. Anyone in the 18th century who was familiar with this central tenet of Freemasonry would be able to read the Declaration of Independence for what it was; that is, a piece of Masonic literature, filled with the principles of Freemasonry; namely the right to pursue life, liberty, and happiness outside of the religion of the state, which, they said, had only proven to divide men, rather than unite them.

The First Amendment & the First Charge

At their first opportunity to amend the recently ratified constitution and insert into it some explicit statement of the United States of America being a Christian nation, the Founding Fathers opted to paraphrase the First Charge of the founding Constitution of Freemasonry (i.e., Anderson’s Constitution of 1723):

1723 Grand Lodge of England – Anderson’s Constitution (First Charge):

A Mason is oblig’d by his Tenure, to obey the moral law; and if he rightly understands the Art, he will never be a stupid Atheist nor an irreligious Libertine. But though in ancient Times Masons were charg’d in every Country to be of the Religion of that Country or Nation, whatever it was, yet ’tis now thought more expedient only to oblige them to that Religion in which all Men agree, leaving their particular Opinions to themselves; that is, to be good Men and true, or Men of Honour and Honesty, by whatever Denominations or Persuasions they may be distinguish’d; whereby Masonry becomes the Center of Union, and the Means of conciliating true Friendship among Persons that must have remain’d at a perpetual Distance.

1789 Amendment (First Amendment):

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .

Here, Freemasonry and the United States both affirm that the only religion they respect is the religion of indifferentism. This subjugation of religion diminishes its value and influence so far that, inevitably, the lodge and state naturally become not only greater than those religions they have diminished (i.e., mere opinions/not worthy of state recognition), but become a religion themselves; that is, a higher good for men to pursue, or what Freemasonry declares itself to be – “the Center of Union.” This is what the United States government is becoming: a centralized governmental religion that tells houses of worship to close, keeps houses of abortion open, pretends to confer marriage, indoctrinate children into its ideology through public education, and promises that regular voting and vaccines are the real keys to salvation.

The refrain from here is that the First Amendment was intended to only concern ‘congress,’ not the state, from establishing a religion. Yet, the Virginia Statue for Religious Freedom drafted by Thomas Jefferson, who had worked with the notable French Freemason and Aristocrat, Gilbert du Motier, Marques de Lafayette, to draft the Declaration of Independence, is the clearest piece of evidence to inform us of the Founder Father’s intention to install the Masonic program (i.e., dogmatic indifferentism) in every state of the union. According to Thomas Jefferson, this bill was an attempt to provide religious freedom to “the Jew, the Gentile, the Christian, the Mahometan, the Hindoo, and [the] infidel of every denomination.” Thereby, elevating the moral law of the state above the diminished value or religious moral law.

Religious Freedom vs. Freedom from Religion

The “Masonic Program,” as it was termed by Leo XIII in his 1890 Dall’alto dell’Apostolicio Seggio, had paved the way for the American Revolution, the French revolution, the European revolutions of 1848, and all the other revolutions against Christ and His Church, including the sexual revolution that began in the 1960s and the homosexualist and non-gender-conforming revolutions of today. These revolutions all claim that oppression from religion is the problem; they argue, if religion could just stop oppressing our freedom, the common good for all will be achieved. This was the same promise after the 1848 revolutions, which lead to a new Prussian constitution that allowed for religious freedom, which was only a ruse to spark another round of religious persecution against the Catholic Church during the German Kulturkampf from 1872 to 1878.

What we have consistently found is that the more the state was able to diminish the value of religion, and, thereby, elevate itself as the true religion, the greater the violence the state was able to commit against the Catholic Church, without the approval of the people.

Promoting Religious Freedom
Has Only Co-Promulgated Dogmatic Indifferentism

The leading role that Freemasons and their appendant bodies had over the culture war has long since waned. Even their successors, the Soviet Communists of 1917, have hence passed the revolutionary torch onto the new generation who cries for freedom from religion, all the while creating a system to worship the government from whom they believe their rights come. Today, it is the sexual deviants of homosexualism, transgenderism, and non-genderism that are championing the same Masonic program.

While this Satanic program to influence the state and to attack the Catholic Church has changed hands of operation, just as it was during the Pontificates of Bl. Pius IX and Leo XIII, the leaders of the Church (like the USCCB) still believe that promoting religious freedom leads to anything other than co-promulgating the evil of freedom from religion. To be sure, in her wisdom, the Church rightly desires to protect the human conscience and promote safe spaces by which all people are free to choose, to search, find, and love God. It is a sin to coerce a man into baptism. The Gospel must be freely accepted. But this is not “religious freedom” as the Masonic program understands it.

One hundred and thirty years later, we are still at the same place where Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical Custodi di Quealla Fede found these to be just some of the major accomplishments of the Masonic Program:

  1. The substitution of Christianity for naturalism.
  2. Substituting the worship of faith with the worship of reason.
  3. The substitution of Catholic morality for independent morality.
  4. Substituting spiritual progress with material progress.
  5. The seizing of Church property, money, and goods that have been squandered.
  6. The substitution of holy maxims and laws from the Gospel with a code of revolution.
  7. The insertion of atheistic doctrines and a vile realism in schools, science, and the Christian arts.
  8. Reducing the number of priests by forcing an unnecessary number of clerics to serve in the military.
  9. Substituting of the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony and the Funeral Mass with civil marriages and funerals.
  10. An overall effort to laicize everything; thereby, replacing the role of the Church in society.
  11. Attempting to silence and discredit the Catholic press.
  12. Closing monasteries and convents but allowing Masonic lodges and sectarian dens to multiply.
  13. Giving rights of association to all kinds of organizations but denying the same legal rights to religious societies.
  14. Proclaiming freedom of religion but exercising intolerance towards Catholicism.
  15. Promising protection, dignity, and independence for the Pope, but exercising a daily contempt of him.
  16. Allowances for public demonstrations against the Pope, but denying the same rights for Catholic demonstrations.
  17. The encouragement of “schisms, apostasies, and revolts against legitimate superiors in the Church.”
  18. Allowing for oaths in impious associations, but vows made for religious obedience are rebuked for being “contrary to human dignity and freedom.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

PARENTAL CHOICE IS NOT AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF THE SEPARATION OF CHUCH AND STATE

JUNE 23, 2022

CRISIS MAGAZINE

A Win for Religious Freedom

JOHN M. GRONDELSKI

first amendment
(Crisis Magazine)

The Supreme Court’s June 21 decision in Carson v. Makinstriking down Maine’s ban on tuition reimbursement for certain high school students, is significant for three reasons: It continues to roll back false understandings of the First Amendment. It helps protect parental choice in education. And it exposes the lingering religious hostilities of a certain part of the American elite.

To recap the case: Because Maine is a large, low-population state, not all towns have high schools. Maine’s state constitution guarantees the right to a primary and secondary education. To square that circle, Maine allows parents in remote communities to send children to private secondary schools, even outside the Pine Tree State, with reimbursement to a certain level. The only catch is that the school cannot be religiously affiliated.

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

Two parents who wanted to send their child to Bangor Christian Schools sued Maine, claiming that BCS was accredited and provided a secondary education. Its only “disqualification” was its Evangelical affiliation. They claimed that was religious discrimination.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 vote, agreed.

First, the ruling continues the current Supreme Court’s trajectory to restoring the First Amendment’s protection of free exercise of religion. As the late Rev. Richard Neuhaus tirelessly pointed out, there are not two religion clauses in the First Amendment but one. As Neuhaus understood it, the first right contained in the First Amendment is about religious freedom. The framers intended to protect religion.  The “no establishment” clause forbids one particular denomination enjoying special privileges (e.g., some of the early colonies had established churches). The “no establishment” clause does not treat religion as such as something prohibited or some second-class phenomenon to be banished behind locked doors in churches. 

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

For 150 years, that is how the First Amendment was understood. Only in 1947 did the Supreme Court (in McCollum v. Board of Education) shift to understanding “no establishment” as applying to religion understood generically. The result of that shift has been to reduce religion to something treated almost as a skunk in public life: something to be tolerated but best pushed to the side.

A child from rural Maine can even take the state’s tuition money outside of Maine to attend a private secondary school—an Ivy League prep school—as long as it is secular. But, somehow, the mere presence of religion in the school’s curriculum, even if that curriculum otherwise meets or exceeds educational standards, irremediably taints the whole program.

Second, the decision prefers parental choice in education. A number of Maine legislators who joined the case contended Maine was making a choice to promote “democratic” and “civil” values by preferring “nonsectarian” over “sectarian” education. In other words, Maine legislators were making that choice.  

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

The Supreme Court, however, found it compelling that parents were making the choice in choosing their child’s school. Before you start cheering, note that the Court’s logic was not necessarily that parental choice was a good thing. No, the fact of parental choice was adduced as proof that Maine really was not promoting religion, at least directly, since the selection of a confessional versus “nonsectarian” school represented a parental, not a state, decision.  

Given that parental choice in education—from financial support to pick a school of your choice to deciding about curricula and schoolbooks to keeping your child away from ideological sexual grooming—is one of the shock points in contemporary debate, every time the law protects school choice, for whatever reason, should generally be applauded and expanded upon.  

There remains a mythology that the “public school” best prepares “democratic citizens” and should, therefore, be preferred by the state. That view ignores the fact that public schools are as much immersed in values as private schools, the only difference being public schools sometimes still pretend to be “value-neutral” (though the more “social justice plus” places concede that’s fiction). We need to shift the debate. What is education for? Is education for kids or for schools? If the former, then school choice should follow. Only if the latter might public schools have a case to push their claim for a monopoly on society’s money.  

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

Third, the majority continues to traffic in the view that religion is an inherently divisive force, which is why in their view the First Amendment limits its civil (i.e., social) impact while protecting (really, tolerating) its private expression. That argument, of course, depends on pretending that secularism is not a religion of its own but just the generic alternative to all things religious, so that our civil community’s default position should be secularism. This cramped view of the First Amendment claims to “protect” religious freedom when, in fact, it only grudgingly tolerates it.  

The same judges who fear the baneful impact of Maine teenagers attending religious secondary schools had no problem giving civil authorities almost carte blanche, in the name of “public health,” to close down your churches and synagogues even as supposedly purely secular entities like casinos or abortion facilities were allowed to function.  

In his dissent, Justice Breyer argues that Maine legislators were not discriminating against religious secondary schools because of their status—because they were operated by a religious group—but because of their teaching—because they actually incorporated religion into their curriculum. Don’t think this is a distinction without a difference. It’s quite important. You can believe anything you want. Just don’t dare carry it into practice. Religion might be seen through a crack in the church door, but it is definitely not to be heard.

Happily, the majority also seems to be moving away from those myths.

We’ll see how far they go.  

Among the cases remaining on this year’s docket for which decisions are due is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, where a football coach was fired for praying in public after high school games. He didn’t compel anybody to join him. He didn’t ask for them to. He simply gave an example, which his opponents deem to be using his public position to spread that baneful influence of religion. If the Court holds that his termination was unlawful, it will be another indication the Court is fixing 75 years of flawed religion jurisprudence.

That may come down soon, along with Dobbs. Let’s wait, see, and pray (maybe even in public).

[Image Credit: Shutterstock]

https://www.facebook.com/v2.10/plugins/like.php?action=like&app_id=485814248461205&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df31a52bc5e3ef3a%26domain%3Dwww.crisismagazine.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.crisismagazine.com%252Ff18808fa333242%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=660&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.crisismagazine.com%2F2022%2Fa-win-for-religious-freedom&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&share=false&show_faces=false

By John M. Grondelski

John M. Grondelski (Ph.D., Fordham) is a former associate dean of the School of Theology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Those who followed St. Athanasius and his priests outside the city walls to worship in the wilderness, apart from their Arian or Semi-Arian bishops, did so because said bishops were placing their apostolic sees in a crisis of separation from Tradition.

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

St. Athanasius, St. Bernard & “Popes and Bishops of 2000 Years” vs. the Francis Suppression of Catholicism & Trad Inc.’s “Schism” 

St. Nicholas (aka Santa Claus) is caught mid-mosaic about to slap [punch] Arius in the chops for his ‘wicked theology’.'” He “sided with… Saint Athanasius and they condemned Arius as a heretic.” [https://uncyclopedia.ca/wiki/Arianism and https://taylormarshall.com/2011/12/saint-nicholas-allegedly-punched-this.html]

Those who followed St. Athanasius and his priests outside the city walls to worship in the wilderness, apart from their Arian or Semi-Arian bishops, did so because said bishops were placing their apostolic sees in a crisis of separation from Tradition.

The motu proprio is on its own a good thing.  Priests supporting the work of restoring Tradition is a good thing.  But if Trads are persecuted in their own local Church, by their own bishop, so be it, that makes them friends of the apostles and prophets who were persecuted…

…  I’m not a sedevacantist, so I recognize the local Ordinary here and obey him where he is not leading me into sin, but the man is objectively a modernist.  As are almost all bishops today.  And Modernism is no better than Arianism……  So they want to suppress the Traditionalist movement?  So be it. That would be nothing new.  Yet, Christ will continue to be our consolation, as we are in unity with all the Popes and Bishops of 2000 years, in public opposition to their modernism. – Joseph Ostermeir

In 2019, Trad Inc. Catholics were defending Francis because they apparently don’t read Catholic history books:

Trad Inc. Steve Skojec’s One Peter Five was accusing the Catholic resistance against the errors and tyrannies of Francis of schism. [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/12/by-way-1p5-newman-st-athanasius.html

These persons need to realize the Arian heretics were saying the same thing as One Peter Five is saying about the Catholic resistance about St. Athanasius. That he was in schism.

The historian Warren Carroll admitted that Pope Liberius excommunicated Athanasius which isn’t an infallible papal action.
(EWTN.com, “Has any Pope been Guilty of Heresy”)

(As an interesting note, in the article above the historian Carroll said “I deny that any [real non-anti-pope] Pope was ever a heretic.” He wrote this before Francis)

The Doctor of the Church was resisting the Arian heretic bishops outside the papal approval.

Cardinal John Henry Newman said Athanasius ordained priests against the authority of the Arian heretical bishops who were validly appointed bishops.

In fact, scholar Joseph Bingham on page 98 in “The Antiquities of the Christian Church” said:

“Athanasius… made no scruples to ordain… [Bishop] Euesebius of Samosata… ordained bishops also in Syria and Cilicia.”

Moreover, Newman in his “The Development of Christian Doctrine” denied that Bishop Athanasius’s “interference” in the dioceses of the heretical Arian bishops was schism:

“If interference is a sin, division which is the cause of it is a greater; but where division is a duty, there can be no sin interference.”
(Gutenberg.org, “An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine,” Sixth Edition)

Was Doctor of the Church St. Athanasius a schismatic?

Moreover, serious scholars are claiming Francis is a material heretic. The 19 Scholar’s Open Letter say that Francis is a material heretic which also brings into play the Bellarmine and Francis de Sales option of declaring an explicit heretical pope self-deposed.

Bishop Rene Gracida’s Open Letter to the Cardinals analysing and quoting Pope John Paul II’s Universi Dominici gregis questions the validity of the Francis conclave calling for an cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave.

Latin language expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo’s in-depth thesis “Munus and Ministerium: A Textual Study of their Usage in the Code of Canon Law of 1983” using exhaustive quotations from canon law showing why canon law explicitly states that ministerium and munus cannot be synonyms that mean the exact same thing or nearly the same thing thus denying the validity of Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation.

Also, some are saying Archbishop Jan Lenga who was the Apostlic Administrator of Kazakhstan, and the country of Turkmenistan is in schism for saying Francis is an anti-pope because Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation was invalid. 

It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard of Clairvaux claimed the supposed pope in Rome was an anti-pope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct by an imperfect council which he headed.

Author Msgr. Leon Cristiani wrote:

“King Louis convoked a Council at Etampes, to consider the question of the double pontifical election… Bernard was received at Etampes as God’s envoy.”
(St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Pages 70-71)

Was Doctor of the Church St. Bernard in schism?

Joseph Ostermeir of The Okie Traditionalist website said it best about the possible suppression of Catholicism by Francis which is called Traditionalism in our time as it was called orthodoxy in the time of St. Athanasius, “St. Nicholas (aka Santa Claus)” and Arius the heretic:

Francis might amend Summorum Pontificum?  The future of the TLM is in jeopardy?  What if, what if my bishop takes away the Latin Mass for us speaking out too much in the church parking lot?

So be it.  As St. Athanasius said, they can take away our churches, but they cannot take away our Faith.  And, he said those faithful to Tradition are the true Church.

When they are in material schism from the historic Church, us refusing to be a part of that does not place us in any kind of schism.  It would then be better to operate outside the diocesan structure–under those conditions–because that would then be more faithful to the Church.  In my opinion.

Those who followed St. Athanasius and his priests outside the city walls to worship in the wilderness, apart from their Arian or Semi-Arian bishops, did so because said bishops were placing their apostolic sees in a crisis of separation from Tradition.

The motu proprio is on its own a good thing.  Priests supporting the work of restoring Tradition is a good thing.  But if Trads are persecuted in their own local Church, by their own bishop, so be it, that makes them friends of the apostles and prophets who were persecuted…

…  I’m not a sedevacantist, so I recognize the local Ordinary here and obey him where he is not leading me into sin, but the man is objectively a modernist.  As are almost all bishops today.  And Modernism is no better than Arianism…

…  So they want to suppress the Traditionalist movement?  So be it. That would be nothing new.  Yet, Christ will continue to be our consolation, as we are in unity with all the Popes and Bishops of 2000 years, in public opposition to their modernism.[http://okietraditionalist.blogspot.com/2021/06/faithful-catholics-are-in-wilderness.html]

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He want you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Those who followed St. Athanasius and his priests outside the city walls to worship in the wilderness, apart from their Arian or Semi-Arian bishops, did so because said bishops were placing their apostolic sees in a crisis of separation from Tradition.

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

St. Athanasius, St. Bernard & “Popes and Bishops of 2000 Years” vs. the Francis Suppression of Catholicism & Trad Inc.’s “Schism” 

St. Nicholas (aka Santa Claus) is caught mid-mosaic about to slap [punch] Arius in the chops for his ‘wicked theology’.'” He “sided with… Saint Athanasius and they condemned Arius as a heretic.” [https://uncyclopedia.ca/wiki/Arianism and https://taylormarshall.com/2011/12/saint-nicholas-allegedly-punched-this.html]

Those who followed St. Athanasius and his priests outside the city walls to worship in the wilderness, apart from their Arian or Semi-Arian bishops, did so because said bishops were placing their apostolic sees in a crisis of separation from Tradition.

The motu proprio is on its own a good thing.  Priests supporting the work of restoring Tradition is a good thing.  But if Trads are persecuted in their own local Church, by their own bishop, so be it, that makes them friends of the apostles and prophets who were persecuted…

…  I’m not a sedevacantist, so I recognize the local Ordinary here and obey him where he is not leading me into sin, but the man is objectively a modernist.  As are almost all bishops today.  And Modernism is no better than Arianism……  So they want to suppress the Traditionalist movement?  So be it. That would be nothing new.  Yet, Christ will continue to be our consolation, as we are in unity with all the Popes and Bishops of 2000 years, in public opposition to their modernism. – Joseph Ostermeir

In 2019, Trad Inc. Catholics were defending Francis because they apparently don’t read Catholic history books:

Trad Inc. Steve Skojec’s One Peter Five was accusing the Catholic resistance against the errors and tyrannies of Francis of schism. [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/12/by-way-1p5-newman-st-athanasius.html

These persons need to realize the Arian heretics were saying the same thing as One Peter Five is saying about the Catholic resistance about St. Athanasius. That he was in schism.

The historian Warren Carroll admitted that Pope Liberius excommunicated Athanasius which isn’t an infallible papal action.
(EWTN.com, “Has any Pope been Guilty of Heresy”)

(As an interesting note, in the article above the historian Carroll said “I deny that any [real non-anti-pope] Pope was ever a heretic.” He wrote this before Francis)

The Doctor of the Church was resisting the Arian heretic bishops outside the papal approval.

Cardinal John Henry Newman said Athanasius ordained priests against the authority of the Arian heretical bishops who were validly appointed bishops.

In fact, scholar Joseph Bingham on page 98 in “The Antiquities of the Christian Church” said:

“Athanasius… made no scruples to ordain… [Bishop] Euesebius of Samosata… ordained bishops also in Syria and Cilicia.”

Moreover, Newman in his “The Development of Christian Doctrine” denied that Bishop Athanasius’s “interference” in the dioceses of the heretical Arian bishops was schism:

“If interference is a sin, division which is the cause of it is a greater; but where division is a duty, there can be no sin interference.”
(Gutenberg.org, “An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine,” Sixth Edition)

Was Doctor of the Church St. Athanasius a schismatic?

Moreover, serious scholars are claiming Francis is a material heretic. The 19 Scholar’s Open Letter say that Francis is a material heretic which also brings into play the Bellarmine and Francis de Sales option of declaring an explicit heretical pope self-deposed.

Bishop Rene Gracida’s Open Letter to the Cardinals analysing and quoting Pope John Paul II’s Universi Dominici gregis questions the validity of the Francis conclave calling for an cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave.

Latin language expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo’s in-depth thesis “Munus and Ministerium: A Textual Study of their Usage in the Code of Canon Law of 1983” using exhaustive quotations from canon law showing why canon law explicitly states that ministerium and munus cannot be synonyms that mean the exact same thing or nearly the same thing thus denying the validity of Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation.

Also, some are saying Archbishop Jan Lenga who was the Apostlic Administrator of Kazakhstan, and the country of Turkmenistan is in schism for saying Francis is an anti-pope because Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation was invalid. 

It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard of Clairvaux claimed the supposed pope in Rome was an anti-pope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct by an imperfect council which he headed.

Author Msgr. Leon Cristiani wrote:

“King Louis convoked a Council at Etampes, to consider the question of the double pontifical election… Bernard was received at Etampes as God’s envoy.”
(St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Pages 70-71)

Was Doctor of the Church St. Bernard in schism?

Joseph Ostermeir of The Okie Traditionalist website said it best about the possible suppression of Catholicism by Francis which is called Traditionalism in our time as it was called orthodoxy in the time of St. Athanasius, “St. Nicholas (aka Santa Claus)” and Arius the heretic:

Francis might amend Summorum Pontificum?  The future of the TLM is in jeopardy?  What if, what if my bishop takes away the Latin Mass for us speaking out too much in the church parking lot?

So be it.  As St. Athanasius said, they can take away our churches, but they cannot take away our Faith.  And, he said those faithful to Tradition are the true Church.

When they are in material schism from the historic Church, us refusing to be a part of that does not place us in any kind of schism.  It would then be better to operate outside the diocesan structure–under those conditions–because that would then be more faithful to the Church.  In my opinion.

Those who followed St. Athanasius and his priests outside the city walls to worship in the wilderness, apart from their Arian or Semi-Arian bishops, did so because said bishops were placing their apostolic sees in a crisis of separation from Tradition.

The motu proprio is on its own a good thing.  Priests supporting the work of restoring Tradition is a good thing.  But if Trads are persecuted in their own local Church, by their own bishop, so be it, that makes them friends of the apostles and prophets who were persecuted…

…  I’m not a sedevacantist, so I recognize the local Ordinary here and obey him where he is not leading me into sin, but the man is objectively a modernist.  As are almost all bishops today.  And Modernism is no better than Arianism…

…  So they want to suppress the Traditionalist movement?  So be it. That would be nothing new.  Yet, Christ will continue to be our consolation, as we are in unity with all the Popes and Bishops of 2000 years, in public opposition to their modernism.[http://okietraditionalist.blogspot.com/2021/06/faithful-catholics-are-in-wilderness.html]

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He want you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Traditionis Custodes • An “Attack” On The Traditional Latin Mass?

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Francis’s “DEVELOPMENT” of “the Supraheresy” that was “Unknown even to the Heretics of Earlier Ages” vs. Benedict XVI & the Infallible Vatican I on “Lawful Development” of Scripture and Tradition 

Traditionis Custodes • An “Attack” On The Traditional Latin Mass?

It is true that St. Athanasius was condemned by Pope Liberius though he was the leader of the defenders of orthodoxy against Arianism at the time. Pope Liberius was a weak man (the first Pope after St. Peter never honored as a saint) and he was imprisoned and probably had been tortured to force him to support the Arian heresy, at the time he condemned St. Athansius. He was therefore obviously acting under duress, as St. Athanasius pointed out when he refused to accept the validity of the excommunication. Though Pope Liberius did condemn St. Athanasius under heavy pressure from his captors, he refused to sign a clearly Arian statement of faith, but did sign an equivocal statement which could be interpreted either in an orthodox or an Arian sense. 

The infallibility of the papacy was therefore preserved even under Liberius’ weak leadership. But Popes are not infallible when making excommunications, or any disciplinary judgment, for they are limited by the information they have on the individual or situation in question. They are only infallible in making doctrinal pronouncements ex cathedra. It is vitally important always to remember that the Pope has two kinds of authority, magisterial (when he is speaking ex cathedra, that is, in a way intended to be binding on the faithful), in which he is infallible; and administrative, as head of the Church appointed by Christ to govern it (which would include excommunications). – Catholic historian Warren Carroll [https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/has-any-pope-been-guilty-of-heresy-1118]

It appears that most Catholics don’t know that Francis’s latest attack on Traditionalist Catholics which Gloria.tv called “Francis Plans Bloodbath: Roman Rite Communities Will Be FORCED Into Novus Ordo” (https://www.gloria.tv/post/cCnpRKVZbAvb6QHZBBNYhUQu7) is apparently an attack on the infallible Vatican I and Pope Benedict XVI’s teachings on the limits of the authority of the pope and “lawful development”:

– For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles. – First Vatican Council

– The pope’s authority is bound to the Tradition of faith, and that also applies to the liturgy. It is not “manufactured” by the authorities. Even the pope can only be a humble servant of its lawful development and abiding integrity and identity…. The authority of the pope is not unlimited; it is at the service of Sacred Tradition. – Pope Benedict XVI when still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger [https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-popes-boundenness-to-tradition-as.html]

To put this in context, Fr. John Hunwicke explained the problems that Francis has with Vatican I and “lawful development” as opposed to “the Supraheresy”:

Every time the current regime has yet another doctrinal accident, ‘developmemt’ is invoked. The Graf von Schoenborn did it at the News Conference after Amoris laetitia when Diane Montagna asked whether that document contradicted Familiaris consortio. Leering down at her, he even had the condescending impertinence to mention Blessed John Henry Newman. During the Deathgate scandal, the same naughty little word has again been bobbing around in the troubled waters.

What few commentators appear to have pointed out is that Newman… he was doing it as an Anglican to satisfy himself that the Catholic Church which he was on the point of joining had never changed its doctrine.

I do not recollect that during the Arian Controversy, or the Reformation disorders, either side ever justified the positions they tenaciously held by invoking Development. My impression is that each side simply bandied Scripture and Tradition cheerfully around so as to show that what they held was the truth “clearly” shown forth in Scripture and Tradition.

Bergoglianism has been encapsulated in an even more extreme form than this by the cynically blasphemous observation of the jesuit “General” that the Lord’s Words were not captured on camera, and by Fr Rosica’s boastfully candid admission that the Church is now entirely at the mercy of a pope to whom neither Scripture nor Tradition are prescriptive. Such exponents appear to offer a model of Christian teaching ministry unknown even to the heretics of earlier ages. Here we have not a heresy, but the supraheresy. Earlier heresiarchs may have monkeyed around with, and perverted the sense of, both Scripture and Tradition, but, I think, never before have we had the diabolical claim that a major heretical teacher is quite simply free from any control whatsoever within the Word of God whether written or orally transmitted. When I use the term ‘diabolical’, I mean it in the fullest possible sense. The fingerprints all over these preposterous claims are unmistakeable.

Some celebrated words in Pastor aeternus of Vatican I admirably taught that the Successor of S Peter was not promised the inspiration of the Spirit so that he could teach new doctrine, but so that by His help he could guard and faithfully set forth the Deposit of Faith handed down through the Apostles.
 [http://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.com/2018/08/development-and-newman.html] 

This get us to Pope Benedict’s idea of “lawful development” as opposed to Francis’s idea of“monkey[ing] around with… both Scripture and Tradition” according to the Pray Tell Blog:

The question can be raised in light of this issue whether there is a 
tension between Ratzinger’s deference toward liturgical tradition and 
its relation to Petrine authority on the one hand, and his understand-
ing of the Holy See as “gardener” of the liturgy on the other hand. 
What exactly constitutes the liturgical “Tradition of faith” within 
the liturgy for which “the pope can only be a humble servant of its 
lawful development and abiding integrity and identity”?80 The pres-
ent location of the peace predates the Gregorian reforms, and since 
77 ratzinger, Spirit of the Liturgy, 70.
78 ratzinger, God Is Near Us, 68.
79 Of course the exchange of peace in the new liturgy could also be 
suppressed; however, the Pope in Sacramentum caritatis, 9, strongly endors-
es the current form of the sign of peace as a gesture of “great value.” Such 
approbation makes a future suppression of the practice unlikely.
80 ratzinger, Spirit of the Liturgy 66.
5THE FuTuRE OF THE ROMAN RITE: 
READING BENEDICT IN THE LIGHT OF RATzINGER
then a distinctive theology has arisen from it.8 But Ratzinger’s com-
ments on the offertory prayers and the sign of peace convey a strong 
preference for the earliest meaning of these rituals. How, then, does 
he understand “lawful development” and organic growth in light of 
two millennia of Christian worship?
In the first place, Ratzinger was very critical of “archaeological 
enthusiasm” that sought the oldest known form of the liturgy, deem-
ing this the “pure” form of the rite and all subsequent growths “the 
product of misunderstandings and ignorance of the past.”8 While 
he acknowledged that “[a] great deal of this was right,” he cautioned 
that “liturgical reform is something different from archaeological 
excavation, and not all the developments of a living thing have to 
be logical in accordance with a rationalistic or historical standard.”8 
This thinking harmonizes with what has been examined thus far: 
Ratzinger clearly was attracted to the original meanings of specific 
liturgical rituals, but he desired them within the context of careful, 
organic growth in light of a genuine understanding of the liturgy as the 
Church’s self-expression, and not as the forced product of a historicism 
and liturgical rigorism that seeks the ancient for its own sake.
Ratzinger acknowledged this contemporary archaizing trend and 
its consequent dismissal of the liturgical inheritance of the Middle 
Ages as a danger latent within the liturgical movement before the 
Council.8 At Fontgombault he rejected this approach in defense of 
“genuinely legitimate developments” of the medieval period, and pro-
posed a “return to an exegesis rooted in the living reality of the Church, 
of the Church of all ages” so that “within the limitations which are 
certainly to be found in the texts of Trent, Trent remains the norm, as 
re-read with our greater knowledge and deeper understanding of the 
Fathers and of the New Testament, as read with the Fathers and with 
the Church of all ages.”85 This return is to be done, he asserted, in 
harmony with the Church and her pastors and not led by specialists, 
as was the case with the reforms following the Council.86
There seems to exist a tension, then, between Ratzinger’s prefer-
ence – and now Benedict’s preference concerning the sign of peace 
– for original liturgical rituals and organic development in relation 
to Petrine authority. Even if a potential change in liturgical rite or 
8 See michael p. foley, “A Crisis of Meaning in the Sign of Peace,” 
The Latin Mass (Advent/Christmas 007) 6-9.
8 ratzinger, Preface to Reid, Organic Development, .
8 Ibid.
8 LAQL 6. Cf. ratzinger, Milestones, 57.
85 LAQL 7-8.
86 LAQL 8.6 DAVID G. BONAGuRA, JR.
potential growth harmonizes with the Church and her pastors, such 
as in Benedict’s collegial consultation with the bishops on moving the 
sign of peace, does the Pope have the authority to change a part of 
the liturgy that existed legitimately and grew in its own right over the 
course of fifteen hundred years? If so, then it seems the liturgical norm 
is not Trent, or even the reform of St Gregory the Great, but rather 
the first few centuries of liturgical worship; yet Ratzinger cautioned 
against establishing such a rational and historical standard. On the 
other hand, it is noted that Ratzinger did not advocate reintroducing 
further ancient practices into the reformed liturgy; his comments on 
the offertory and the peace follow from initiations made by others. 
But within these two specific rituals, the question remains as to what 
should be the standard for proper organic growth following their ini-
tiations, even when they stand to benefit the whole Church.87
Nevertheless, despite this difficulty, there is no tension between 
liturgical epochs for the theologian Joseph Ratzinger, and now Pope 
Benedict XVI, because his standard is the genuine spirit of the lit-
urgy that has permeated the Church for two millennia and found its 
most recent expression in the liturgical movement and Sacrosanctum 
concilium. As a theologian, Ratzinger reminded his readers that “the 
Liturgy is not about us, but about God.”88 Now as Roman Pontiff, 
Benedict has already implemented his reform of the spirit of the lit-
urgy through Sacramentum caritatis, Summorum pontificum, and his own 
manner of celebrating the liturgy. Even moving the sign of peace is 
aimed primarily at fostering this same spirit. Thus a large-scale rubri-
cal reform of the reform does not seem to be in the works; any such 
initiative must wait until the “new liturgical movement” desired by 
Ratzinger in The Spirit of the Liturgy and put in motion since Benedict’s 
election takes hold. As he told Peter Seewald, only then can a proper 
assessment of rubrics occur, an assessment that may still be decades 
away. For the interim, Benedict’s concluding comment in his preface 
to his “opera omnia” succinctly captures his early achievements and 
future vision for liturgical reform as pope: “I would be happy if this 
new edition of my liturgical writings could contribute to displaying 
the great perspectives of our liturgy, and putting certain frivolous 
controversies about external forms in the right place.”89
David G. Bonagura, Jr., is a graduate student at the Institute of Religious Studies 
at St Joseph Seminary in Dunwoodie, New York, and an associate editor of The u
niversity Bookman. [https://www.praytellblog.com//wp-content/uploads/2010/02/13.3Bonagura1.pdf]

Finally, renowned Catholic philosopher Edward Feser explains what “lawful development” looks like in layman’s language:

But development is not a matter of looking for loopholes by which the Church “could teach” some novel doctrine you’ve come up with.  The Church either already teaches something, at least implicitly, or she does not.  If she does, then naturally she could teach it.  But if she doesn’t, then she can’t teach it.  As the First Vatican Council taught: 

For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles.

And as Pope St. Pius X exclaimed: “Far, far from the clergy be the love of novelty!”

In his book on Aquinas, Chesterton says, concerning the development of doctrine:

When we talk of a child being well-developed, we mean that he has grown bigger and stronger with his own strength; not that he is padded with borrowed pillows or walks on stilts to make him look taller.  When we say that a puppy develops into a dog, we do not mean that his growth is a gradual compromise with a cat; we mean that he becomes more doggy and not less.

Now, part of the point here is that a true development of doctrine is neither the introduction into Catholic teaching of some novelty from outside (which would be like putting pillows and stilts on a child) nor the reversal of past teaching (which would be like a puppy becoming less dog-like).  But the example also illustrates the point (whether Chesterton meant it to or not) that development is something that happens rather than something the Church does.  A child’s developing is not like a child’s stretching.  It is not something he tries to do.

Unsurprisingly, then, proposals that doctrine be actively “developed” in this or that direction end up resembling amputations of doggy parts or strapping pillows, stilts, and the like onto a child.  To cash out the metaphors, such proposals involve ignoring aspects of past teaching that conflict with a proposed novelty, strained reinterpretations of texts that contradict the novelty, claiming to see novel theses asserted in ancient texts that have never historically been understood to assert such theses, and so forth.

That brings us to a sixth point: Much of what is peddled as “development of doctrine” these days is precisely the kind of thing Pius X condemned as modernism.  Go read Pascendi Dominici Gregis.  And weep. [http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2017/11/two-further-ideas-about-development-of.html]

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

PRAY FOR AN IMPERFECT COUNCIL

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Flashback: Are Bp. Gracida & Bp. Lenga the New St. Athanisuis Bishops? & Might Lenga’s former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to declare Francis an Antipope in an Imperfect Council as St. Bernard of Clairvaux’s Imperfect Council in France was the first to declared the supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an Antipope?

 Abp Lenga otrzymał zakaz publicznego sprawowania liturgii i...

 Eyewitness to History | The Vortex

Are Bp. Gracida & Bp. Lenga Schismatics Like Doctors of the Church:

Might Lenga’s former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to declare Francis an antipope in an imperfect council as St. Bernard of Clairvaux’s imperfect council in France was the first to declared the supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an antipope?  

Is Lenga in schism as some may be stating for claiming Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation was invalid thus Francis is an antipope?

It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard claimed the supposed pope in Rome was an antipope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct by an imperfect council which he headed. – The Catholic Monitor
 

Archbishop Jan Lenga was formerly the “Apostlic Administrator” of not only Kazakhstan, but of the tiny country of Turkmenistan.
(Fatima, Russia and Pope John Paul II: How Mary Intervened to Deliver Russia,” Page 202)

Interestingly, The Catholic Monitor which has given some coverage to Archbishop Lenga’s position that Francis is an antipope has begun noticing that the people of Turkmenistan are starting to read the online Monitor.

Might Lenga’s former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to declare Francis an antipope in an imperfect council as St. Bernard of Clairvaux’s imperfect council in France was the first to declared the supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an antipope?

Is Lenga in schism as some may be stating for claiming Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation was invalid thus Francis is an antipope?

It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard claimed the supposed pope in Rome was an antipope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct by an imperfect council which he headed.

Author Msgr. Leon Cristiani wrote:

“King Louis convoked a Council at Etampes, to consider the question of the double pontifical election… Bernard was received at Etampes as God’s envoy.”
(St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Pages 70-71)

Was St. Bernard in schism?

The Arian heretics were saying the same thing about St. Athanasius. That he was in schism.

The saint was resisting the Arian heretic bishops even apparently outside the valid pope’s approval.

It appears that Archbishop Lenga may force the cardinals and bishops to do an investigation and call an imperfect council into the validity of the Francis’s papacy because a bishop cannot suspend a bishop. Only a pope can suspend a bishop.

But, Lenga states Benedict is still pope because of a invalid resignation and therefore Francis isn’t pope according to the archbishop.

Cardinal John Henry Newman it appears showed that a validly appointed bishop can’t suspend another validly appointed bishop.

Newman said Athanasius ordained priests against the authority of the Arian heretical bishops who were validly appointed bishops.

In fact, scholar Joseph Bingham on page 98 in “The Antiquities of the Christian Church” said:

“Athanasius… made no scruples to ordain… [Bishop] Euesebius of Samosata… ordained bishops also in Syria and Cilicia.”

Moreover, Newman in his “The Development of Christian Doctrine” denied that Bishop Athanasius’s “interference” in the dioceses of the heretical Arian bishops was schism:

“If interference is a sin, division which is the cause of it is a greater; but where division is a duty, there can be no sin interference.”
(Gutenberg.org, “An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine,” Sixth Edition)

Was Doctor of the Church St. Athanasius a schismatic?

Moreover, serious scholars are claiming Francis is a material heretic. The 19 Scholar’s Open Letter say that Francis is a material heretic which also brings into play the Bellarmine and Francis de Sales option of declaring an explicit heretical pope self-deposed.

Bishop Gracida’s Open Letter to the Cardinals analysing and quoting Pope John Paul II’s Universi Dominici gregis questions the validity of the Francis conclave calling for an cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave.

Latin language expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo’s in-depth thesis “Munus and Ministerium: A Textual Study of their Usage in the Code of Canon Law of 1983” using exhaustive quotations from canon law showing why canon law explicitly states that ministerium and munus cannot be synonyms that mean the exact same thing or nearly the same thing thus denying the validity of Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Ademar said…

CHRISTUS SURREXIT!

Why Benedict XVI is still Pope, and Bergoglio never was is simple:

1.) Benedict officially resigned tbe ministerium, but not the munus (office).

2.) Benedict still behaves as Pope by giving Apostolic blessings, using his papal name, etc.

Assuming 1 and 2 were not an issue:

3.) Benedict committed resignation-invalidating substantial error by claiming a bifurcated papacy, w Bergoglio as active member.

4.) Benedict was also under resignation-invalidating duress when the Vatican was not able to do electronic financial transactions for a couple of days, a problem “resolved” the day after his announced resignation.

Assuming 3 and 4 were not an issue:

5.) There was conclave-invalidating vote canvassing done by the St. Gallen Mafia beforehand.

AND, assuming 5 were not an issue:

6.) Bergoglio is a manifest heretic.(Pacha-demon worship in Vatican, Holy Communion for adulteters, etc., etc., etc. ,etc……)

‘Nuff said!

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment