THE HORROR !!! THE HORROR !!! LIFE AS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT A JESUIT UNIVERSITY

!!!!

St. Ignatius Gate entrance at Boston College (Photo: Boston_Starbucks_Rebel / Wikipedia)

Once, I was a theologian.

 

 
The brain-blowing combination of asserting that what is not Catholic teaching is somehow Catholic teaching and then shrieking like a frightened schoolgirl when the word “heresy” is uttered is what the American Catholic/Jesuit theological academy is all about
Dorothy Cummings McLean

October 31, 2015

THE CATHOLIC WORLD REPORT

But, to tell you the truth, as a believing Catholic who seeks to understand what it is she believes, I am still a theologian. I was taught this on the first day of my “Method in Theology” class in Toronto, and it wrote itself permanently on my heart. All believing Catholics who seek to understand what it is they believe are Catholic theologians, which means that Ross Douthat is a Catholic theologian. His academic critics are … academics. Some of them may be Catholic theologians, but I wouldn’t assume that—especially not if they got their training at Boston College.

“Own your heresy” tweeted Douthat, and Father James Martin, SJ seemed to throw up his hands in holy horror. Oh, how irresponsible! Oh, how potentially damaging to a career! Oh, how the CDF will swoop down like a wolf upon the fold. Except it won’t, and it almost never does—and they’re too busy packing up Monsignor Charamsa’s office right now anyway.

The brain-blowing combination of asserting that what is not Catholic teaching is somehow Catholic teaching and then shrieking like a frightened schoolgirl when the word “heresy” is uttered is what the American Catholic/Jesuit theological academy is all about, and I should know. I was in it for two of the most miserable years of my life.

As the Affair Douthat unfolds, I keep attaching faces to the names I hadn’t heard or seen for many years. One of them belongs to an active homosexual who brought his boyfriend along on the departmental retreat and shared a room with him. Another belongs to an active unmarried heterosexual who brought his girlfriend along on the departmental retreat and shared a room with her. They were both very pleasant and cheerful men. I liked them very much—which does not erase the facts that they did not believe the teaching of the Catholic Church concerning sexual morality and that today they are professional Catholic theologians.

Boston College. It’s been ten years since I first turned up for “Accepted Students Day”, and eight years since I left with my professional hopes in tatters, but the very name still plunges me into depression. The contrast between the loving, thoughtful environment of my Canadian theologate and the neurotic, boastful, overrated, double-faced snake pit that was the Boston College theology department transformed me from one of the “rock stars” of my Canadian college—successfully juggling coursework and three jobs, graduating magna cum laude—into a hysterical wreck, unable to read print.

Saint Ignatius of Loyola composed a prayer that begins, “Take, Lord, my liberty, my understanding, my entire will”. In the post-Vatican II era it was set to a jolly tune, and I had sung it blithely in Toronto without the slightest clue what losing one’s understanding might mean. In my case it meant forcing myself, in agony, to make the little black marks on the page make sense and then exploding in fury when the document before me was merely some speculative nonsense about a “Markian” community that may or may not have existed. “Might”, “should”, “it could be”: the weasel words of academia.

I had worked enormously hard to get to Boston College—three years of busting my brain and non-stop reading, writing, volunteering, ministry placements, jobs—and I had loved it. When I got the phone call on February 24, 2005 telling me I had been accepted for the Boston College PhD program in theology, my heart ached with joy. My life—I was still a single woman then—was finally on track: I would finish my PhD, get a job in a Jesuit college, walk forever in the groves of academe, well paid, serving God doing what I loved best.

Reality slapped me in the face when I arrived for “Accepted Students Day”—April 1, I believe. April Fool’s Day. The Holy Father, John Paul II, was dying. This was uppermost on my mind, and when, at a meet-and-greet, I found myself face-to-face with a celebrated (in the USA and Canada, that is) professor, I said something like “Isn’t it sad about the Holy Father?” and he said—to me, whom he had just met—”I think he’s dead already and they’re just covering it up.”

I was staggered. I don’t know what I replied, but no doubt it was Canadian-polite. At one point I was mysteriously whisked away by a plainclothes nun-professor who had a conspiratorial air. She chatted about her own time in my hometown, and I had the impression I had been singled out stealthily. But why?

That was what it was like for the next two years. Outrageous gossip about professors and theologians I respected as heroes. (“So, Dorothy, does X have AIDS?” “Y was a drunk, of course.” “I hope it’s true Z had a mistress.”) Conspiracy. (“Tell me, Dorothy, what does Professor Q say in his classes about….”) Outrageous remarks. (“Bishops are thugs!”) Boasting. (“And I said, ‘Senator…’”) And paranoia. Insane paranoia. (“Dorothy, don’t write that down!“)

To my amazement, I discovered that a professor I admired was nervous of me because he thought I was “conservative”—not a good thing to be in the Boston College theology department, let me tell you. (“But I thought I was center-left”, I wailed to a friend from home.) And after a visiting priest-professor had a neurotic hissy fit aimed at me before all my classmates—because I questioned his view that the ordained priesthood and Sunday Mass attendance were ultimately doomed—and I complained to the priest-professor in charge of this class, he suggested that this man, too, was afraid of me.

Me: a small 35-year-old graduate student from Canada, a PhD student far from home, completely dependent on my stipend, my future career dependent on the goodwill of my professors. Him: a tall, 50-odd year old American Jesuit priest with tenure at an insanely wealthy American Jesuit university. But somehow I was the scary one, as if I spent my evenings on the phone denouncing all my professors to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. As if the CDF really had the time to chase every random American professor in Catholic academia. As if these professors were actually that important or influential. Of course, Benedict XVI was the pope then, and my stars, how the hissy-fit throwing professor hated him.

What I did not know, when I blithely applied to study with them, was that the Boston College professors whose books I had admired did not publish what they really thought. I had no idea, for example, that one woman professor was all in favour of women’s ordination until I turned up in Boston and saw a Charles Dana Gibson cartoon of an elegant Gibson Girl wearing preaching bands stuck to her office door. The delicate balance I had admired, the appeal to both liberals and conservatives while sticking to the bounds of orthodoxy, was just a clever trick.  The profs would say what they liked in class to their students; tape recorders were, of course, banned.

There was also a lot of theological arm-twisting. In one scarring incident, a pastoral theology professor showed up to my PhD seminar class with two large female henchmen-students and photocopies of an article about Archbishop Sean O’Malley’s obedience to the Roman directive not to allow Catholic adoption agencies to give children to same-sex couples. The topic of the seminar turned out to be, “How do we convince the Archbishop to disobey Rome?” As I tearfully (stupid tears!) defended a child’s right to a mother and a father, priest-colleagues stared silently at the table.

U.S. Senators—particularly Catholic Senators—consulted the moral theologians of Boston College on a regular basis. One of my Jesuit professors, to the dismay of another Jesuit professor who ranted to me about it, testified that opposing gay marriage was not in keeping with Catholic tradition. This, I imagine, was technically true, since there had never been gay marriage to oppose before. But, naturally, that was another clever trick.

My theologate in Canada was run for the students; the theology department of Boston College was run for the professors. Students were pawns to be collected and either groomed to continue the professors’ intellectual legacy at other Jesuit colleges, pumped for information about other professors, or bored senseless by Big Names sitting firmly on their laurels.

The emotional damage wreaked on students was certainly not confined to me. One M.A. student from the American South, a Protestant fan of Flannery O’Connor, had come to Boston College to learn about Catholicism. Within weeks she was terribly confused. She asked different students what Catholicism was and cried a lot. She told me she had been told, by a “liberal”, it was better to be a Protestant than a “conservative” Catholic at Boston College. I wonder if she ever did become a Catholic.

You will have noticed that I have not named names. I do not name names because I will not honor my professors’ paranoid fears about me, the “conservative” who came to Boston College thinking she belonged there. I thought I belonged there because I thought it was a Catholic college with a Catholic theology department.

“We don’t like to call it a ‘Catholic’ theology department,” said a professor to me while I was there. But, yes, they do. They do when it’s convenient.

I was very cross with God, naturally. I couldn’t understand why He had allowed me to go to Boston College but not equipped me with the mental strength to survive the PhD. I was furious and frightened when He took away my ability to read print. (I could always read the internet, I discovered.) I couldn’t find Him anywhere on campus, save—occasionally—during the Benediction organized by the undergrad Saint Thomas More Society. I used to visit the (uber-modernist, ragged metal) statue of Saint Ignatius of Loyola to ask Saint Ignatius what was going on, but I couldn’t find Saint Ignatius either.

What would Saint Ignatius have thought, I always wondered, of the one million dollar building named after him? What would he have thought of the $40,000-a-year undergrad tuition-and-board? What would he, who told his Jesuits not to take money for their teaching, have thought about the millions made off the bodies of the football players? Boston College was founded for the poor Irish Catholics of South Boston, but the only Southie accents I heard came from the lips of one ancient retired Jesuit, a secretary and the groundsmen toiling over the landscape so beautiful, manicured and dead.

Today I believe God sent me to Boston College not to become a professor at a Jesuit university, as I then believed, but to meet my housemate Ted, who was a traditionalist Catholic and a blogger. Thanks to Ted’s influence, I too became a blogger, and that has shaped my whole post-academic life. It has also made me more relevant to contemporary Catholic discourse, which is no longer confined to the privileged few who are courted and developed by their professors, but—thanks to the internet—is open to all Catholics who can—and will—read and write.

About the Author
author image

Dorothy Cummings McLean

Dorothy Cummings McLean is a Canadian writer living abroad. Her first novel with Ignatius Press is Ceremony of Innocence. She has been a regular contributor to The Catholic Register (Toronto). Her first book, Seraphic Singles: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Single Life, is a popular work of nonfiction.

 COMMENTS:
  • I am sorry Dorothy for what you went through. When persecution is levied inside the Church, it is hard to bear. It is the best of times and the worst of times. I am grateful to be able to connect with so many committed Catholics who love the Faith and don’t want to suppress its hope and beauty. Please God we can all carry on for as long as God wills it.

  • Thank you, Ms. McLean, for sharing your harrowing experience of life in a Jesuit college. I thought being raised by American nuns post-Vatican II was bad. I guess my brothers had it worse. I may have just dodged a bullet!

    I come from a family of Jesuit men. I was spared because I am a woman and the Jesuit College (Ateneo de Manila in the Philippines) was not co-ed at the time.

    Of course, I was an atheist for most of my life. My undergraduate degrees in engineering and my graduate degree in Mathematics are all from an non-sectarian private college in Upstate NY, a mere five hour drive to the Canadian border.

    My brother, who died last year, told my niece (who was 11 years-old at the time) that she was excused from attending Ateneo de Manila if she did not want to. And she does not want to because she does not care for their Volleyball team.

    My nephews, however, are not excused. My 5 year-old nephew started school last year (being 1 of only four boys who were accepted into Ateneo from his pre-school class of 40 boys and girls). They start them off very young here. My nephew is expected to stay in Ateneo for the next 20-25 years of his life until he finishes college. His physician-mother expects him to become a doctor also. She herself was not accepted into Ateneo medical school.

    I will pray for him, of course.

    But I must admit, my brothers never lost faith in GOD; however p***ed off they may have been with the Jesuits. I, on the other hand, required a “nervous breakdown” in my middle-age before I could surmount the obstacle of my atheism.

    Hmmm…

    Perhaps the Jesuits may have come out with the better product, after all.

    see more

  • Richard John Neuhaus, writing in First Things in April, 2003:

    It was at a conference in the mid eighties that I listened to Hans Küng hold forth in triumphalist tones on the victory of the progressives. “We” control, he announced, the seminaries, the academic departments of theology, the catechetical and liturgical institutions, the publishing houses, the magazines that matter, and the chanceries. Most of the bishops, he said, are now on “our” side, and those who aren’t have been neutralized. Anyone who wants a future in the hierarchy or the Catholic academy has no choice but to cooperate, he observed. It was a clean sweep; all that was left were a few details; the disgruntled band of risibly reactionary dissidents from the new order didn’t understand what had happened and couldn’t do much about it.”

    Slowly this sick situation was turned around by JP II and Benedict. Things were just starting to return to sanity.

    Now, our latest Pope seems to be returning us to the eighties. I hope I am wrong. But the bold attempt to shrilly “take care of” Russ Douthat by these faux academics, and by Father James Martin, (who tweeted out that he “agreed” with the letter of the academics), indicates at least THEY think they are back in the saddle again under this Pope, and a brave new era of dissident control of the church is back.

    After all, their control of the German church worked out so well.

    • Your quote from Hans Kung says it all. I’m hoping and praying Pope Francis’s papacy serves as a wake up call to the faithful cardinals and bishops around the world to be much more vigilant in who they appoint into the episcopate and as seminary instructors. Frankly, the next pope needs to be more than orthodox. He needs to break with the papal tradition of the past 50 years or so of essentially ignoring dissent theologians and bishops. The next pope will have a real mess on his hands. He is going to have to be assertive and actually remove dissident bishops and theologians. While I am cautiously optimistic we can get an orthodox pope at the next conclave, I’m somewhat pessimistic, given the precedent of the past 50 yeas, he will take the assertive steps necessary to clean up the mess. This past failure to take the assertive steps to weed these people out of the episcopacy and seminaries is the reason why the likes of Hans Kung has been able to spread like a virus through the ranks of the Church.

      • Yes. I loved JPII and will be eternally grateful to him for his condemnation of abortion as an “unspeakable crime” when he visited the U.S. — back in the early days of the Pro-Life movement when such an authoritative vindication of our efforts was sorely needed. I am also very grateful to him for Evangelium Vitae. I am grateful to Benedict XVI for addressing the huge problems with modern Scripture scholarship. Yet neither did as you have described, which, I wholeheartedly agree, was needed. We are now seeing the disastrous results of the failure to deal with many heretical bishops and theologians on the part of JPII and Benedict XVI, who were both very saintly men, yet it appears they failed in this regard.

        There was a reason that the Church used to clearly, bluntly and forcefully condemn certain notions with “If anyone says that … [ insert heretical notion here ] … let him be anathema.” It was to prevent the confusion and heresy to which the faithful are now being subjected.

        • I agree. St. JPII and Benedict XVI were good and holy men. Indeed, they were great theologians. But they did not, on a large scale, go after heretical bishops. The Church, in Her collective wisdom, has a lot of experience in dealing with heresy. But, after VATII, it seems the traditional method of rooting out heretical bishops (essentially, search and replace) was abandoned in favor of ignoring them. It reminds of a gardener who does not weed his garden. Ignoring the weeds is only a recipe for a failed garden. You have to ask yourself, had the likes of Kung, Kasper, Cupich, Marx, Wuerl, and Bonny been expelled from the episcopate, would we be in the jam we are in now? This failure to root out heretical bishops is now haunting the Church.

        • Yes, I hear you but I must point out that when the enemies/jackals are surrounding you, mostly hidden and protected in secret networks of power, it is not so easy to root them out. Jesus said in His Messages that JPII was surrounded and that his very life was in danger. But He is rooting them out! Yes! See the fall-out – I can’t hide my pleasure!

      • I have no doubt that Pope Francis has what it takes to take out these dissidents. Watch and see.

        • No evidence for this view? I hope you are right, but why should I think so?

          • What is the source of your information?

            Mine is scripture.

            • I posted only a hope of mine.

              Were you replying to Gallibus?

              • I was replying to you.

                Hope can only be found in the scripture:

                18 And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.

                Matthew 16:18

        • But how can he possibly do that when he is on their side?

          • The correct side would be the side Pope Francis is on.

            Therefore, if I were you, I would not spend any time watching ‘their side’. I would only spend time watching Pope Francis.

      • As long as these dunces are more concerned with ‘social justice’ nonsense and reforming healthcare and ingratiating themselves to anti-Catholic liberal elites, nothing is going to happen in the U.S. or in the Vatican.

        The rot will continue to fester.

        • “Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied.” -Matthew 5:6

          “For whatever you do unto the least of these My brothers and sisters, you do unto Me.” -Matthew 25:40

          Social Justice “nonsense,” hmm? If we do not care for our fellow man, especially the downtrodden, we do not care for the Gospel nor for our Lord.

    • What Hans Küng and the Kasperite bishops can’t control, however, is the demographics of the Catholic Church in 2015. In the areas and orders where the Liberal Project has advanced the most, it’s dying the most rapidly, in one way or another – in most of Western Europe, Quebec, the American Northeast, say, there’s little left but secularized ex-Catholics, whereas in much of Latin America, defections to Pentecostals and Evangelicals (and even secularism) are accelerating everywhere. Africa, however (for all of its problems), is booming with laity and vocations. If liberals still hold serve in theology departments, it’s because they have tenure to protect them. But their project increasingly has little contact or relevance for what survives of the institutional Church.

      Things will still get worse in many ways before they start to get better. But these basic realities can’t be reversed, short of the use of external force.

  • This article has been an eye-opener to me. Thank you.

    I was brought up in the Church of England, lost my faith and for many years did the Chestertonian thing of, ‘having stopped believing in God, believed in anything’.

    After some years of reflection and prayer I was received into the Catholic Church a year ago and have since become increasingly confused, especially under this pontificate. One of the reasons for my conversion was the certainty, inherent in Catholic belief as I understood it, the adherence to the continuity of the Faith as preached by Jesus and the belief that, however difficult to accept and live, certain fixed points existed in the Doctrine of the Church.

    The more I read the more I feel that the changes that occurred after Varican ll were wrong and detrimental. I do not think, from my necessarily limited knowledge that the intentions of the Council were at fault but what has happened since does seem so to me.

    I live in rural France where there are numerous village churches, often of great beauty, but hardly any priests, indeed my enormous parish seems to have lost two out of three because of petty disagreements amongst the clergy themselves. One of those who departed instructed me and I could have taken my concerns to him, but no longer.

    The order of the Mass appears to differ in each church that I attend and, although I speak French well, that is of little help. I have no adult experience of the Latin Mass but am conscious of the fact that it would be so much better if the Universal Church had a Universal liturgy.

    In short, I like Evelyn Waugh, am profoundly unhappy with Saturday evening Mass, even when it is available, and make strenuous efforts to seek out Sunday morning Mass wherever it is in within my range, something now limited by age and a degree of infirmity.

    I was delighted by the election of Pope Benedict XVl and profoundly saddened by his abdication. I have been cautious about the present Holy Father from the outset and am now frankly disenchanted and wonder where the Church is heading.

    As a newcomer and neophyte I am probably raising points and stating opinions to which I have no real right but those are my feeings. My faith in God remains intact but I am profoundly unhappy about the direction apparently being taken by the Church. Perhaps someone with more and better founded knowledge might offer me advice and encouragement?

    see more

    • There is hope–and the Latin Mass–in France. Please see informaition about the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter in France here: http://www.fssp.fr/ See also “Institut du Christ Roi Souverain Pretre” (i.e. The Institute of Christ the King in France.) These two orders celebrate the 1962 Mass in Latin with permission of the local ordinaries. There are also orthodox Catholics in the “Manif Pour Tous” movement, although this is not itself a Catholic movement.

    • Richard: it is very very hard to understand the Church as such without a good grounding in her history. This is what none of those who are her enemies, even those within the Church, do, so it sets one apart immediately. It can be a trek, but if you read the Fathers, the Doctors and the saints, and pay attention with a faithful and submissive heart, you will learn much and often surpass the nonsense of those currently “in the know” in Catholicism. Measure everything against St Thomas Aquinas, against the authoritative teachings of the Councils, and against Augustine and the Fathers, and you cannot go wrong.

      As for France, look up some of the communities like Les Beatitudes: they exist in some of the smaller towns. Also, you can find Benedictines — men and women, quite strong in France — with legitimate, wonderful liturgies. Pay a visit to Fontgambault and Le Barroux, both wonderful, orthodox monasteries.

    • Since you know French, I recommend to you the writings of Fr. Bryan Houghton, which are more easily available in French than in English.

    • Please, Richard, continue to express your sincere struggles, and to hang in there with the Catholic Church. Consider reading Chesterton’s masterpiece, “The Everlasting Man,” or at least the chapter where he writes about the five apparent deaths of the Church, and how the sons were devout even after the fathers were disinterested. Watch the great movie, “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” and hold fast to lost causes as the ones most worth fighting for because of one simple rule, “Love thy neighbor.” Jesus is the ultimate lost cause of Good Friday who yet triumphs on Easter, conquering sin and death forever.
      I think the good, great work done by popes John Paul II and Benedict XVi will continue to bear wonderful fruit in the future, even as the old heretics fade away into irrelevance. Perhaps this latest nonsense surrounding the synod of the family is the last gasp of those peevish and perverse dissenters who distorted the good work of Vatican II to their own twisted designs. The great popes just mentioned have showed us the true meaning and authentic goodness of Vatican II in their prolific writings and profound lives, and the cream of the council will continue to rise above the soured milk of the hypocrites who have tried to taint it with their egos and libidos.
      Also, realize that this seems to be a golden era of Catholic publishing in the United States, with the likes of Ignatius and Sophia and Our Sunday Visitor and TAN and Catholic Answers publishing both excellent new works along with bringing back old classics. Then there’s EWTN, as well, and Fr. Barron’s splendid video ministry. Those who seek goodness and beauty and truth will indeed find, but our efforts are being made easier by these remarkable resources.
      Yes, it can indeed get discouraging at times, even exasperating, and very lonely — that has largely been my experience as I progress through my fifties and scuffle to live authentic Catholicism as best I can. There is no guarantee that the revival initiated by Pope John Paul II with such vibrancy will continue to flourish into full bloom — and not be stomped upon by forces of darkness outside and inside the Church — but there is reason for good hope.
      Let’s not lose our nerve, but rather support each other in the traditional and timeless doctrines of the Catholic Church, the ways of love and life given to us by Jesus and handed down by the apostles. If the Catholic Church disarmed the Roman Empire without raising the sword, if it overcame the colossal evils of the ancient world through prayer and sacrifice and good works, then we can win over our society with the same weapons of spirituality. Even in our frailty and faultiness, we can channel the love of Jesus for the restoration of the world; from the allegory of “It’s a Wonderful Life,” we can reject Pottersville and embrace Bedford Falls, by taking the monotony and frustrations of daily life and transforming them into acts of love for God and neighbor.
      As St. Therese wrote, the keys to the salvation of ourselves and society are surrender and gratitude, a growing trust in the goodness and mercy of Jesus, who loves us now and always, unto eternal life. On this All Saints Day, may all of our holy brothers and sisters in heaven help us to fight the good fight of everlasting love.

      see more

    • Richard, I am old enough to be retired, but also a convert late in life. I had found that the huge game of “catch-up” with doctrine and Church history is daunting, at best. Along with reading, I have found that EWTN (online–streaming and YouTube–, globally on TV, and other venues) has the most valuable and enjoyable sources of learning with many programs and series. Just go online to: http://www.ewtn.com and look around. They even have an online library with encyclicals that you can download and print at home without cost. Their (global)TV guide is also online with helpful information on programs and series. Fear not, even many cradle Catholics find it a great learning source. Enjoy the adventure!

    • You should investigate your nearest Anglican Ordinariate parish — so many people like you have found a happy, holy home there, even if they have to drive 50 miles each week to attend Mass. The Liturgy is gorgeous and contemplative. If you are thirsting to love God and your neighbor and improve our morally corrupt culture, go there. Many believe that the Anglican Ordinariate in the UK, the USA and Australia is the way the Holy Spirit is fulfilling Blessed John Henry Newman’s “Second Spring” prophecy about the reconversion of England — and by extension, the English speaking peoples — to the Catholic faith.

  • Thank you Dorothy. It has been a bit painful to remember my experience in another public college managed by Jesuits here in Spain. It was also funded for economically poor but smart youth, and is was also a mess in terms of spirituality and Doctrine. God bless you.

  • You need to do what the Church requires you to do in such a case, and frankly I’m surprised that it hasn’t occurred to you. You need to compose a libellus and send it to the Holy See. Have a look at the Code of Canon Law. John Paul II simplified the process explicitly so that Americans can clean house. But the Holy See can do nothing without a canonical suit, and a canonical suit begins with a libellus. Get to it!

    • Do lay people have standing to bring such canonical suits? Do we need a canon lawyer to bring the initial pleadings, etc.? This is a very important topic. I am a secular lawyer and want to go to town on these people but I haven’t dug into canon law far enough to find out.

  • Oh go ahead, Mrs. McLean, vindicate their fears. Name names. Give the names of men & women who openly proclaim their hatred of the Catholic Faith, & demonically pretend to speak in Her name, the better thereby to win souls for their real master.
    *
    And with the who, detail the how, as well as the upper honchos careful to sustain their hatred & its fruit.

  • Thank you for sharing this account of your painful experiences at BC. When I read the line “…but I couldn’t find St. Ignatius either”, it reminded me of column I wrote earlier this year — http://catholicvoiceomaha.com/….

  • I was a Protestant at BC, and then (wonder of wonders, many years hence) associated with the nearby Catholic seminary. Once in a BC theology colloquium I mentioned that when one comes to saving faith, one passes from death to life, from the world to the kingdom of God. Horrors, I didn’t even mention the “Christ Event.” A priest at the nearby seminary had trouble with my framing people’s problems with God as “sin.” The final straw was on the Maundy Thursday when I was overcome with grief toward sin, crying in public–Jesus being led away by betrayal, when my Christian friends online posting the marriage equality symbol on Facebook, my Christian daughter fighting with God (very sad), and Leonard Cohen was prophesying The Future. And I thought it was just that I hadn’t taken my meds. No, I was probably seeing more clearly than I ever have, before or since. But a man can’t live on the edge of disaster for more than a moment or two. I somehow thought that they would have been used to the tears of grief after the pedophilia repentance.

    Here’s the good part of the song:

    Things are going to slide, slide in all directions Won’t be nothing
    Nothing you can measure anymore
    The blizzard, the blizzard of the world
    has crossed the threshold
    and it has overturned
    the order of the soul
    When they said REPENT REPENT
    I wonder what they meant
    When they said REPENT REPENT
    I wonder what they meant
    When they said REPENT REPENT
    I wonder what they meant

    You don’t know me from the wind
    you never will, you never did
    I’m the little jew
    who wrote the Bible
    I’ve seen the nations rise and fall
    I’ve heard their stories, heard them all
    but love’s the only engine of survival
    Your servant here, he has been told
    to say it clear, to say it cold:
    It’s over, it ain’t going
    any further
    And now the wheels of heaven stop
    you feel the devil’s riding crop
    Get ready for the future:
    it is murder

    Things are going to slide …

    There’ll be the breaking of the ancient
    western code
    Your private life will suddenly explode
    There’ll be phantoms
    There’ll be fires on the road
    and the white man dancing
    You’ll see a woman
    hanging upside down
    her features covered by her fallen gown
    and all the lousy little poets
    coming round
    tryin’ to sound like Charlie Manson
    and the white man dancin’

    Give me back the Berlin wall
    Give me Stalin and St Paul
    Give me Christ
    or give me Hiroshima
    Destroy another fetus now
    We don’t like children anyhow
    I’ve seen the future, baby:
    it is murder

    see more

    • Ring the bells that still can ring,
      Forget your perfect offering,
      There is a crack in everything,
      That’s how the light gets in.

      Leonard Cohen – Anthem

      • I’ve taken comfort…strange how that works…from that verse of Anthem. There’s a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in. I wonder sometimes how tidy lives ever get insight!

  • I have sympathy for what the author went through, but how could anyone be so naive as to think one could study the true Catholic faith at Boston College?

  • I often wonder what would happen if the real St. Ignatius suddenly turned up at many of these Jesuit schools’ front door?

  • Kudos Dorothy! I feel your pain. I was a department head for a diocese for almost twenty years. Those who promote this vitriolic dissent are in fact fighting to justify their own lives. Thank you for this piece.

  • Bravo Dorothy!
    It is hard to escape the snake pit unscathed. Wear the battle scars like a badge.

  • I think the Church in the US should exercise the Nuclear Option and strip any Catholic University that refuses to adhere to orthodoxy of it’s right to be called a “Catholic” University and teach Catholic Theology. The Catholic Church did exactly that with the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru after they refused to stop defying Church orders to stop teaching heterodox views (the same University is where Gustavo Guiterrrez, the founder of Liberation Theology, once taught as a professor for those who want to get an idea what that University taught).

    • Liberation Theology is nothing compared to what is taught at some of these Catholic schools. LT was a perversion and distortion of Catholicism and an attempt to justify Marxism/Socialism.

      These schools are WORSE because they are indoctrinating below-the-radar in stuff that is directly contrary to Church teachings.

  • A comment, if I may, from this side of the Pond, specifically about heresy.

    I passed my Religious Knowledge exam aged 16. Together with the Penny Catechism and of course now, the CCC, and the Catholic Encyclopedia, that gets me along.

    The term heresy should be used as appropriate for the simple reason that the Church, dare I say it, the post-Vat II Church, is rife with it. It was there in
    all its ugliness at the Synod as Kasperism, (wearing a nice paper face mask). The time for being nice has come and gone. Personally I use the word heresy as and when appropriate, and that is becoming increasingly and depressingly frequent!

    • I’m beginning to wonder if the entire Jesuit Order needs to be re-thought under a future orthodox pope. Dare I say it, heresy seems to be rampant among the Jesuits. At a minimum, the Jesuits need to be screened, priest by priest, for orthodoxy. Perhaps, a more appropriate move would be to suppress it.

      • If the Legionnaries did not get suppressed, no order is getting suppressed.

        • No need to formally suppress. Just crush. Consider what our pope of mercy (a Jesuit) has done to the Franciscans of the Immaculate. An utter papal disgrace.

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to THE HORROR !!! THE HORROR !!! LIFE AS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT A JESUIT UNIVERSITY

  1. Petra says:

    Wow. Never would I have believed that a pastor of a parish had not the power to stop those abuses. I imagine it must have been h#ll listening to disgruntled parishioners, or watching as your congregation diminished and the fiasco of what went on in the church. I know myself I just never come back to a parish where this kind of high-jinks is happening. In fact, I recently left a parish I had attended for over 12 years because a new heterodox priest arrived and said all the English masses. I tried to stay, but no. I just couldn’t.
    I attended Loyola University’s Pastoral Studies Program in the late 1980’s. My experience was much like that of Dorothy McClean’s. It was everything and anything but Catholicism. Lots of new age. Lots of feminism. Lots of liberation theology. Lots and lots of heresy. Sickening and a waste of time and money. My problem was that I actually AM a conservative, and they hated me. I parroting their teachings back at them in class and in my papers, even while they knew I did not buy a word of it. They would sneer at me. But what could they do? I was not saying anything but what they had said.
    God bless you Father. I know your pain, and I ask God to reward you with all the blessings in the world for all your have suffered watching those abuse your Lord.

  2. glmcreations says:

    Kung left one thing off the list that he and his ilk controlled: the Church. Perhaps he was wiser than we know, wiser than he himself knew – in NOT asserting that he and they controlled God’s Church. Yes, they controlled/control some institutions, some entities; but he apparently had not re-read Job before he spoke: “Then the Lord addressed Job: Who is this that obscures divine plans with words of ignorance . . . Where were you when I founded the earth? . . . Have you ever in your lifetime commanded the morning and shown the dawn its place . . .? . . .from the wicked the light is withheld and the arm of pride is shattered . . .Can you send forth the lightning on its way . . .?” I learned a lesson some decades ago in a parish staffed by dissident Jesuits – they violated canon law willy nilly, they preached heresy publicly, and did their own liturgy almost to the point of having not only illicit, but invalid masses. My numerous letters and complaints, with reporting of the facts that were never denied, up the chain of command, all the way to Rome, changed nothing. I learned that I was not the pastor. Some years later, after I was asked to leave that parish, the Jesuits left, and all the abuses were abolished by the new pastor. (I was never invited to return). So it is with the Church. We are not the pastors, we are not the shepherds. Until these folks change and/or die, – and they will unless Kung and his ilk resurrect – we do not have the power; but as God says in Job, He has the power. He will “control” His Church – and we must remain faithful and true through it all. Dorothy, you keep on keepin’ on. God bless you and always keep you safe in the palm of His hand. Guy McClung, San Antonio, Texas

Comments are closed.