STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES

80e26-molkvan
the Vortex

Play Video

PRO-LIFERS BATTLING BISHOPS

Reporting from the Texas State Capitol.

March 5, 201846 Comments

TRANSCRIPT

This special edition is reporting from Austin, Texas, the state capitol, on the eve of the mid-term primaries where the Catholic bishops have gotten themselves into quite a controversy that is now going to threaten the tax exempt status of every diocese in the state and potentially the whole country. More on that most important point after a little background.

There is a great polarization going on, not just in America in general, but within each of the political parties. Liberals want the Democratic party to be even more liberal as evidenced by liberal matriarch Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the oldest serving U.S. senator, not even getting her party’s support last week because she isn’t liberal enough. Within the Republican party, the same thing is happening. Solid conservatives are fed up with the pussy-footing of what they call RINOs, Republican in Name Only, who vote more moderate on causes near and dear to conservatives, largely social issues like abortion.

Here in Texas, the RINO Establishment has held power for a long time, and this establishment has been largely backed by the Catholic bishops of the state, casting their votes in ways generally approved of by the bishops and their agenda, particularly in regards to illegal immigration issues. Texas is of course greatly impacted by the question of illegals since it shares the longest border of any state with Mexico where most illegals come from.

For many years, the establishment RINOs have voted in a somewhat guarded measure on issues of abortion and end of life concerns, causing Texas to experience a continued slow drop in pro-life status compared to other states. Texas used to be counted as one of the leading pro-life states but has seen that status erode under the RINO influence. While voting “somewhat” pro-life, it hasn’t been nearly enough for solid pro-life organizations like Texas Right To Life, which represents hundreds of thousands of Texas’ true conservatives and is gaining considerable clout in voting booths. Yet even on some occasions, the so-called pro-life RINOs have actually cast their votes in favor of abortion, for example, when state lawmaker Byron Cook, trumpeted as being pro-life, actually took to the floor and argued in favor of allowing babies diagnosed with deformities to be aborted.

It is precisely this kind of pro-life doublespeak and weak-kneed approach to the life issues that Texas Right to Life and its massive following in Texas want to bring to an end. So the group has become majorly aggressive in seeking to replace the establishment RINOs — the same RINOs who have the backing and support of the Texas Bishops’ Conference — and this dynamic has put Texas Right to Life and the bishops on a collision course.

Last week, in what many are viewing as an attempt to directly influence the outcome of tomorrow’s midterm elections, the bishops issued an unheard-of, unprecedented rebuke of Texas Right to Life, essentially claiming teaching authority over the group in matters political. The statement consisted of three major points, but the most troublesome point is the third point where they publicly decry the Texas Right To Life Voter Guide, which supports the young and upcoming anti-Establishment Republican candidates primed to upset the old-time GOP Establishment politicians favored by the bishops.

And here is where the bishops may have actually have run afoul of IRS regulations forbidding Church involvement in politics, a rule known as the Johnson Rule, which actually originated under the administration of Texan President Lyndon B. Johnson back in the 1960s. To have injected themselves into statewide political races just a week before the elections and essentially condemned a political activist group by name, a group that publicly backs certain candidates over others, crosses the line and puts the bishops’ conference in a position where it could thereby lose its tax-exempt status.

Church Militant has learned exclusively that plans are being drawn up and formulated to file a petition with the IRS to have the tax-exempt status of the Church in Texas completely stripped. It that were to happen, the dollar cost to the dioceses of Texas would run into the hundreds of millions of dollars and bankrupt many dioceses. Additionally, experts observe that since the head of the Texas Catholic Conference, Galveston-Houston Cdl. Daniel DiNardo, is also president of the U.S. bishops’ national conference, this could actually extend beyond Texas and impact the tax-exempt status of the entire Church across the country.

If that scenario were to play out which observers tell Church Militant is certainly a possibility, the Church across America would become financially insolvent as the 194 dioceses across the country would have to scramble to sell tens of billions of dollars of assets to pay the exorbitant tax bill that would surely come their way in the absence of their tax-exempt status — billions and billions of dollars presently and moving forward that the federal government would dearly love to get its hands on.

How did this happen? How is it that the bishops of Texas would collectively sign on to an agreement that could potentially bankrupt the Church in the United States? The answer, insiders say, lies with one woman, Jennifer Carr Allmon, the executive director of the Texas Bishops’ Conference, the first woman to ever hold that position.

A little background is in order here. The most vocal bishop in support of the attacks against Texas Right to Life has been Fort Worth Bp. Michael Olson who launched a blistering accusatory social media campaign on his Twitter feed, actually telling parishioners to let him know if his orders to his diocesan priests to read the statement of condemnation out loud at Masses from the pulpit were being followed. Olson is the same bishop who ordered Catholic pro-life groups in his diocese not to protest in front of abortion chambers with banners of Our Lady of Guadalupe because the image of Our Lady was offensive to Protestants who might also be protesting.

The behind the scenes of this is that very wealthy supporters of the Church in Fort Worth, who also support the status-quo RINOs, became very concerned that the young Republicans backed by Texas Right to Life were close to capturing the state legislature, according to internal polls. So they reached out to Olson and Jennifer Carr Allmon and said something needed to be done and done quickly before the elections.

One such establishment figure in the Texas legislature the rich want to protect because he is seen as “their man” is Charlie Geren, who barely hung on to his seat in the last election, almost losing to a Texas Right to Life challenger Bo French. That same race is again coming down to the wire and a loss in that race for the GOP-RINO establishment would signal a massive defeat for the status quo, including the bishops who are wedded to that same status quo.

The bishops are interested in maintaining the current political environment because the up and comer Republicans backed by Texas Right to Life are not friendly to the cause of illegal immigration which is the cause fueling the engine of the bishops’ political agenda in Texas. If the state of Texas suddenly turns anti-illegal immigration, the Texas bishops stand to lose a great deal, so they are willing to settle for weak pro-life support from RINOs in order to hold on to large sums of money going to what they see as the most important issue — illegal immigration.

If the up and comers score big tomorrow night, it will have devastating consequences for the bishops, so they have gone all in trying to trash those candidates, however indirectly, using a poorly thought-out, as well as, abysmally executed plan put together by Carr Allmon. But the upshot is, in trying to hold on to their favored position of money and influence in Texas, they may have inadvertently set in motion a series of events that could cost them their tax-exempt status and relegate them to political poverty.

Reports are that some of the Texas bishops are now backpedaling from the statement, some even privately denying any advance knowledge of it. Some of this backpedaling appeared to be the case in a Friday afternoon interview on EWTN where San Angelo Bp. Michael Sis downplayed the statement and offered that everyone just needs to find common ground and work together — a radical departure from the aggressive tone of the earlier condemnation.

That the entire tax-exempt status of the Church, certainly in Texas and possibly in the entire country, owing to the connection between both Cdl. Daniel DiNardo, could come down to a hastily compiled statement by one woman, Carr Allmon, in charge of the Texas Bishops’ Conference and backed by one hot-tempered bishop wanting to do the bidding of some rich donors with political interests, it’s simply mind-boggling. But given the current temperature of the culture with regard to Catholic matters, a financial tsunami could certainly be in the cards for the nation’s bishops.

Insiders tell Church Militant the petition to have the tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS is underway and should be completed sometime after the election. Texas now looms as a kind of Alamo for the Church in the United States — a last-stand effort to align themselves with the power brokers and help them hold on to power for their own selfish reasons.

Tomorrow’s election results and a future IRS ruling loom very large indeed for the social justice warriors who have had control in the Church for decades. In the ever-widening polarization of the culture, visible in the political division within the parties, the bishops may have just backed the wrong horse in siding with the old guard.

Stay tuned this week to Church Militant for more analysis and the results of these pivotal midterm elections.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Avatar

Join the discussion…

LOG IN WITH
OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS

    Avatar

    What’s sad is that the services that the church provides, will virtually disappear. The government will have to pick up the slack and can they afford it? Strangely enough, this may be a blessing because what it will show, if it happens, is that the church will survive and not be beholding to government. We will no longer have to walk on egg shells. a “voters guide” which is no more then a list of where the candidates stand on certain issues, is far less then what I’ve seen by other denominations. That’s a Baptist bible belt and if this should happen to the Catholic church, it will not be foo far behind for other denominations. Just look at what the Obama preacher said … Other denominations should be paying attention because the government will be coming their way soon as well.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    The Johnson Amendment was actually implemented in 1954 when LBJ was Senate Majority Leader

  • Reply
    Avatar

    First, I support Texas Right to Life (TRL) and plan to use their voter’s guide. However, there are two points in this article I take strong exception to.

    First, many pro-life legislators voted against the dismemberment ban because they believed it would be overturned in the courts and then once again the state of Texas would be giving millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood’s lawyers. It is fine to debate whether or not that would happen, but please be honest regarding their position. It is bearing false witness to claim they think it is okay to abort children with disabilities.

    Why doesn’t TRL try to pass a ban on all abortions from the point of conception? Because they know it would be overturned in the courts and we’d just be having the state of Texas giving millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood’s lawyers. It would be dishonest for people to report that TRL is for abortions the first 20 weeks in the same way it is dishonest to claim the pro-life legislators were for aborting people with disabilities.

    Second, the reason our bishops support people who immigrate here illegally is because they are pastorally invested in that community, which is admirable. Personally, I want our border enforced and for us to do a better job vetting who is allowed into our country, and I will vote for people who will support that type of legislation. I am not for deporting everyone who came here illegally. We were not enforcing our borders and we were providing incentives for people to come here illegally.

    If the reason the bishops support people who immigrated here illegally is for financial gain, then it is fine you reported this. If it is not the reason, then this is bearing false witness. (We were given only ten commandments, and this breaks one of them!) So please be very careful that you know their motivations if you are going to claim to know them.

    see more

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Republican used to mean something respectable. The last Presidential election was an example of how the Establishment Republican Party Elites were the same as the Democrats. For years, the GOP has been selling out conservatives. All the Moderate Republicans have been helping to push the GOP agenda to the center and now to the Left. The GOP establishment always threw conservatives “a bone” by nominating a candidate that would say something to appeal the conservative base. But, in the end, they always betrayed Conservatives by preventing or blocking the conservative candidate and nominating a Moderate. One only has to look at the last 30 years of Presidential Elections to see the proof of this. NOT ONE of the Presidential Candidates nominated in the last 30 years has been a true conservative – even the one from Texas!!!
    The conclusion many of us drew during the 2015-2016 campaign season was that the Republican Party and the Democrat Party were ONE BIG Party! It became an issue of elites vs. grassroots because the RINOs controlling the GOP were busily engaged in moving the party to the Left, making it more “progressive,” more “moderate” to appeal to some “invisible” voting block that was on the fence or undecided (what % *really* were the undecided). They always felt that the conservative agenda would never “appeal” to moderates or independents or the undecided voting block. So, they preferred appeasing moderates/independents/undecided and selling out the conservatives.
    Well, many conservatives had just about enough in 2016. Many conservatives finally left the party and became independent. And the beauty has been watching the RINOs squirm in their seats and be at such unrest when Trump actually one. Trump was the payback for all the years that they sold out conservatives. Trump helped “flush out” some of the RINOs (i.e. Kasich in Ohio). The GOP truly has a new face now.
    Lastly, it’s pretty clear that RINOs and CINOs have a lot in common. It used to be that almost all CINOs were exclusively Democrats – with some Republican exceptions, of course – because the Democrats held the larger Catholic voting block. However, the fact that more RINOs are being labeled CINOs is proof positive that the tide has definitely shifted.
    The question remains: Which party do faithful Catholics support? We KNOW that the Democrat Party is off the table, which leaves only the GOP. Although there has been some draining of the swamp in DC, the GOP is still riddled with Democrats operating under the cover of Republican (and some of them as Catholics, too). Until a great majority of these RINOs are flushed out, the GOP is still not safe to return back to. Faithful Catholics are on the fringe, not really having a home to go to.

    see more

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Let us pray our rosaries for the right outcome of this election.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Does anyone have any knowledge of any dissenting Bishops’ votes, by name? I’m 100% certain my bishop was not among them. My bishop voiced words of consolation to a congregation shortly after the 2016 election.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    I KNEW this was ultimately about immigration. These FOOLISH liberal prelates! Immigration is a PRUDENTIAL decision. It’s not an INTRINSIC EVIL like abortion. These Democrats in vestments have elevated immigration over abortion because it lines their pockets with millions of dollars every year from the federal government to resettle these people. These WOLVES put Judas to shame, trying to use Christ and His teachings to further their personal political agenda. Shame on them! I doubt they will lose their tax exempt status because of this, even though they deserve it. They will, however, incur costly legal expenses, which ultimately, comes from the pockets of the faithful. They’ve also further damaged the already blugeoned reputation of the Catholic Church with their prideful political hacking.

    Pray for Cardinal Sarah, the next pope, to clean house!

  • Reply
  • One other person is typing…
      Avatar

      Cardinal Sarah, the next Pope! Amen!

    • Reply
      Avatar

      I’ve come to the conclusion that most bishops have no faith in God. Many times Michael will ask at the end of a Vortex something like, “Do these bishops really believe they will not have to give an account of their actions to almighty God on the day or their judgments?

      The answer, Michael, is Yes, the bishops really believe they will not have to give an account. There is no blinking at this fact any longer. There can be no more “charitable interpretations” of their actions.

      These bishops have no faith. The Catholic church is, for them, an institution whose (diminishing) status they can use to bring about the social change they desire. That’s all it is to them. They are the cancer within.

    • Reply
      Avatar

      I like the tone! I agree with what you are saying. And I, too, feel that it will be costly for them and that they will not lose their tax exempt status. There may even be some Churches closing. We’ll see if after this, these prelates will be willing to meet faithful Catholics “where we’re at.” Lord knows they’ve been more concerned about meeting dissident Catholics where they are at, yet, neglecting the ones who will be left after the church buildings begin to close.

    • Reply
    Avatar

    As harsh as this may sound, my first reaction to the Church losing it’s IRS tax exempt status and possibly bankrupting it… Good. It’s about time. As long as the current model continues, nothing will ever change. This reminds me of 2008 when all of DC was going nuts over the housing bubble stock market crash. At the time my reaction was the same. They need to let the whole house of cards collapse. Yeah it would be painful, for about 3-5 years. But on the other side of that, is a much more stable beginning. But, we know they didn’t, and 10 years later, things are worse. The sooner the rug is yanked out from under their feet the better.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Thank you Michael for flying to Texas and give us the front line report. It is indeed valuable to have such an outstanding journalist who reports true news. Let us pray for the victory of true conservatives for the election result tomorrow.

    I am not sure I understand about the IRS ruling issue and how it affects the church’s tax exempt status. Can anyone shed a light?

  • Reply
  • One other person is typing…
    Avatar

    Jennifer Carr Allmon and Bishop Michael Olson look strangely similar.
    I thought there wasn’t nepotism in the Church.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Well done Michael Voris. You have my prayers. Looking forward to hearing you this coming weekend in Cleveland. May God bless you.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    I did some research on Texas Right to Life. Kyleen Wright is the director and as sincere as she can be. She gave a statement on the issue which was gracious in tone. It was obvious that she was hurt by the betrayal.—An iceberg is 90% below water. You have to look at Jennifer Carr Allmon and Bishop Michael Olson for their true agenda. This has the odor of Blase Cupich all over it.— The “toning down” of anti abortion and the lightening of gay criticism along with the diagnosis of the Republicans being the party of evil capitalism is the prime motivator. Our Lady of Guadalupe, the true protector of the immigrant and the innocent, pray for us. — The radicals in the Catholic progressive movement believe that they can secretly side with the Democrats as the party of “social justice”. The statement by P. Francis that “capitalism is the ‘dung’ of the devil” will come back to haunt the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops as it continues to march to the left. The question now remains of whether the true plan of the “moles within” is to show mercy for those aborting or for its true acceptance.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    The Texas Bishops problem with the Right to Life organization?
    Their Advisory and Critique-
    The Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops’ advisory listed three conflicts with the pro-life organization:

    • Pro-life reform: “Texas Right to Life often opposes the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops and has implied that the bishops do not faithfully represent Church teaching. Part of the dispute is rooted in Texas Right to Life’s rejection of incremental pro-life reforms …”

    • End-of-life reform: “The bishops have been compelled to publicly correct Texas Right to Life’s misstatements on end-of-life care and advance directives, in which Texas Right to Life implied that the legislation the bishops were supporting allowed euthanasia and death panels rather than the reality that the legislation reflected the long-standing church teaching requiring a balance of patient autonomy and the physician conscience protection.”

    • Texas Right to Life’s voter guide: “Finally, Texas Right to Life publishes a scorecard that purports to show which Texas legislators are pro-life. We believe this publication is not based on a fair analysis of a legislator’s work, but rather upon whether the legislator has followed voting recommendations of Texas Right to Life.”

    So now we should have “incremental pro-life reforms”–gradualism–at what–a snails pace?
    Note-Texas prolife reforms have been microscopic/ dismal vs other states.
    Texas Bishops-
    By what moral basis or overt evil done do you Banish a Pro Life organization from parishes in Texas?
    Why? If there is no moral or Catholic dogma violated–is not your action purely political?

    see more

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Wow. Gotta watch this one again. Not certain I understood or followed it fully.
    Thanks for keeping up with things, Michael. We definitely need your work.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    The modernist bishops have been in bed with progressives for decades. Look at the fools who were arrested on Capitol Hill last week for the “Catholic Day of Action for Dreamers.” Sisters and priests were “standing in solidarity” with the illegal aliens. Thomas Reese, SJ (pal of James Martin, SJ) looked like a complete tool getting dragged out by security. What an embarrassment they are.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    I thought there was a move (Trump Administration) to end the Johnson Amendent so that Churches could participate in the public square without losing their tax exempt status?

  • Reply
    Avatar

    The Lucifarian objective to control then destroy THE CHURCH is in It’s final stages.
    “You cannot serve both God and Mamon,” and the church leadership appears to serve “Mamon” rather than God.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    So two-faced: so that they were not compelled to say you must vote for the prolife Repubican over the prodeath prohomosexual pro abortion Demoncrat, the bishops hid behind the Johnson Amendment. What they have now done shows how desperate they are. They have also just lit a fire under many of the anti-catholic prolife folks in Texas who will now vote for whoever is running against a bishop’s anti-life RINO candidate. By their actions they have doomed their RINOs to extinction; and may Texas Right To Life hasten that extinction.

    Of course in many areas, these bishops in democrat clothing were silent, but their silence was a loud and pointed implicit endorsement of democrats, candidates of the Party Of Death. From pulpits around Texas, the faithful heard from their alleged shepherds “We are not single issue voters,” that unsaid single issue being the murders daily, weekly yearly in Texas of hundreds of thousands of Texas babies, the murders being the overt policy of the democrats of the Party Of Death.

    In many places on any given day, all the murdered babies, ten, twenty, thirty, 100%, were Hispanic-American babies. For years, the Texas Conference of bishops have been silent about this brown genocide. Since Roe, 60,000,000 murdered babies in the US, and astoundingly, half, 30,000,000, were the children of minority mamas. Half. The democrat Party of Death RETA policy was demonically successful in getting rid of Sanger’s brown and black “human weeds.” (RETA: racial eugenic targeted abortion).

    Still the Catholic bishops of Texas have remained silent. Hand-in-glove with the democrats and profeath RINOs in their Texas alliance for death, they have not said from pulpits to vote for a prolife candidate instead of a party-of-death candidate, because the prolife candidate was – horror of horrors – a republican candidate. Never mind that the democrat candidate supported the murder of babies, and the RETA policy.

    But last week, mirabile dictu, wonder of wonders, the bishops speak! What could have spurred them to finally speak out – since they have never had the moral courage to say, as Peter did to the leaders of the time, “We can obey you, or we can obey God” ? Why speak out now when Hispanic-Americans are beginning to see the light and are beginning to vote for prolilfe folks to help save babies in Texas?

    The bishops have become painfully aware that their Texas alliance for death with the democrats and profeath RINOs is in danger. They saw what happened in 2016 in the Texas Rio Grande Valley when the Hispanic-American Catholics were shown how the Democrat RETA policy had decimated their numbers right here in Texas. And then the final horror – these enlightened voters, who love their children and live and die for family, they voted for Republicans. You could hear the weeping and the gnashing of prelates’ teeth from Brownsville to McAllen to Austin to Fort Worth to Houston – and even in El Paso.

    So the previously silent bishops, fearing that their Texas alliance for death partnership with the democrats would fail to deliver the once- rock-solid monolith of the Hispanic-American vote, in their desperation, loudly again proclaiming they must keep silent, have come out and condemned the quintessential Texas prolife organization, Texas Right To Life, because of its efforts – wildly successful efforts – to speak the truth about the brown genocide of Texas babies promoted by the Party Of Death democrats and Texas Right To Life’s support of non-democrat non-RETA-policy candidates; and Yes, most of them, hated non-RINO republicans.

    Lastly gasping, the bishops speak now days before the upcoming elections. Coincidence? No way, Jose. If Texas Right To Life and others like minded are to be stopped, if the Texas alliance for death is to succeed as it has in the past to elect democrats and RINO prodeath GOP candidates, the bishops had to speak out now – and it will be no surprise when they forsake these little ones in Fall 2018 again silently proclaiming we cannot endorse anyone.

    Didn’t Jesus say something about “woe” to those who hurt His children? Millstones, necks and drowning? And about hirelings, masquerading as shepherds, who run away, leaving the innocent sheep to the wolves?
    Guy McClung, Texas

    see more

  • Reply
      Avatar

      Didn’t President Trump say as a candidate that he wanted to have the Johnson Amendment repealed? Is that in the works? Would it be too late for this mishap?

    • Reply
      Avatar

      I here I was thinking Texas was a conservative state. This is also proof how the “seamless garment” has covered Texas as well – being that it started in Chicago. Like any garment, the USCCB appears to have kept adding to the garment by “weaving in” more issues “social justice” issues. Now, it looks like the garment has “blanketed” the WHOLE state of Texas. Now that’s ONE BIG seamless garment – even by Texas standards!

    • Reply
        Avatar

        This is why Texans need to protect their state from liberals moving here and bringing their blue demographics to make our state purple. Keep fighting conservative pro-life Texans and take nothing for granted!

      • Reply
    Avatar

    What really burns my buttons here is that the Texas bishops CLEARLY believe that the laity is so poorly formed as to believe that we owe our bishops absolute obedience.

    Well, Bishop Olsen, Saint Thomas Aquinas…says otherwise.

    And you know what? I think I’ll go with him – rather than a man who uses TWITTER to get parishioners to RAT OUT THEIR OWN PRIESTS! 😡

    Saint Thomas Aquinas: There being an imminent danger for the Faith, prelates must be questioned, even publicly, by their subjects.

    ALSO…pray, pray, PRAY for our good and holy priests in Texas, on the receiving end of yet more “blue on blue” fire from their superiors.

    They DO take a vow of obedience to the bishop – and he can (and often does) make their lives a misery. 😢

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Well, if you want sensible immigration, the end to abortion, and parental rights to guide the raising and educating of your children to remain with the parents– you probably won’t vote for ANYONE that the Bishops in Texas want in office. Oh and if you are seriously in favor of the 1st and 2nd amendments of the US Constitution, well, anyone BUT those chosen by the Bishops.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Pray for the challengers to win their elections.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Did these bishops support Abortion Barbie, Wendy Davis?

  • Reply
    Avatar

    If i say what i want to say some people would have a heart attack.So i will pray.

  • Reply
      Avatar

      many of us know exactly what you mean. Have deleted way more comments than I post because I didn’t want to have to go to confession for a stupid internet posting.

    • Reply
    Avatar

    These modernist bishops are forgetting whose Church it truly is. I would like to think that Our Lord is offering a correction to the bishops with this chain of events. I remember being taught that in order to be a good Catholic, one follows the laws of the land in which he or she resides. To my recollection, “illegal” was not a part of that.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Fort Worth is home to a very strong and vital conservative movement among Episcopalians who are, as it turns out, more Catholic than the Catholics.

    “Some of you will grab hold of a relative and say, ‘You still have a coat. Be our leader and rule this heap of ruins.'”

  • Reply
    Avatar

    Forgive me if this is foolishness that I haven’t thought through well enough, but if the Church lost its tax-exempt status and essentially was bankrupted wouldn’t that actually be more a positive thing for the faithful? To lose it’s temporal power in this way would make all the money and power hungry people in the Church “give up the ghost” so to speak and it would leave the faithful behind which would in turn be far more powerful and outspoken.

  • Reply
      Avatar

      The Johnson Amendment needs to be repealed so that the Church can have exempt status AND speak up for Life and Morals…..

    • Reply
      Avatar

      Except that suddenly the power of government to control the Church via taxation would be let loose to the delight of the devil. No, the Faithful need to get over the clericalism and BE Catholic in spite of the hierarchy being off the tracks. If the Faithful ignore the bishops unless they speak correctly on some aspect of the Faith, well, that will help greatly– the Faithful thinking for themselves and applying Church teaching.

    • Reply
    Avatar

    A very clear explanation of what is going on in Texas politics. Thank you, Michael! Maybe this is the end of the money grab by the bishops who support illegal immigration for the government funds. They have abandoned our unborn for those who break the law.

  • Reply
    Avatar

    “And friends, our seventh collection this morning is for the [fill in name of bogus charity] fund. Please remember those less fortunate than us. Er, I mean, you.”

  • Reply
    • Avatar

      I’ve come to the conclusion that most bishops have no faith in God. Many times Michael will ask at the end of a Vortex something like, “Do these bishops really believe they will not have to give an account of their actions to almighty God on the day or their judgments?

      The answer, Michael, is Yes, the bishops really believe they will not have to give an account. There is no blinking at this fact any longer. There can be no more “charitable interpretations” of their actions.

      These bishops have no faith. The Catholic church is, for them, an institution whose (diminishing) status they can use to bring about the social change they desire. That’s all it is to them. They are the cancer within.

      Avatar

      I like the tone! I agree with what you are saying. And I, too, feel that it will be costly for them and that they will not lose their tax exempt status. There may even be some Churches closing. We’ll see if after this, these prelates will be willing to meet faithful Catholics “where we’re at.” Lord knows they’ve been more concerned about meeting dissident Catholics where they are at, yet, neglecting the ones who will be left after the church buildings begin to close.

    Avatar

    As harsh as this may sound, my first reaction to the Church losing it’s IRS tax exempt status and possibly bankrupting it… Good. It’s about time. As long as the current model continues, nothing will ever change. This reminds me of 2008 when all of DC was going nuts over the housing bubble stock market crash. At the time my reaction was the same. They need to let the whole house of cards collapse. Yeah it would be painful, for about 3-5 years. But on the other side of that, is a much more stable beginning. But, we know they didn’t, and 10 years later, things are worse. The sooner the rug is yanked out from under their feet the better.

    Avatar

    Thank you Michael for flying to Texas and give us the front line report. It is indeed valuable to have such an outstanding journalist who reports true news. Let us pray for the victory of true conservatives for the election result tomorrow.

    I am not sure I understand about the IRS ruling issue and how it affects the church’s tax exempt status. Can anyone shed a light?

    Avatar

    Jennifer Carr Allmon and Bishop Michael Olson look strangely similar.
    I thought there wasn’t nepotism in the Church.

    Avatar

    Well done Michael Voris. You have my prayers. Looking forward to hearing you this coming weekend in Cleveland. May God bless you.

    Avatar

    I did some research on Texas Right to Life. Kyleen Wright is the director and as sincere as she can be. She gave a statement on the issue which was gracious in tone. It was obvious that she was hurt by the betrayal.—An iceberg is 90% below water. You have to look at Jennifer Carr Allmon and Bishop Michael Olson for their true agenda. This has the odor of Blase Cupich all over it.— The “toning down” of anti abortion and the lightening of gay criticism along with the diagnosis of the Republicans being the party of evil capitalism is the prime motivator. Our Lady of Guadalupe, the true protector of the immigrant and the innocent, pray for us. — The radicals in the Catholic progressive movement believe that they can secretly side with the Democrats as the party of “social justice”. The statement by P. Francis that “capitalism is the ‘dung’ of the devil” will come back to haunt the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops as it continues to march to the left. The question now remains of whether the true plan of the “moles within” is to show mercy for those aborting or for its true acceptance.

    Avatar

    The Texas Bishops problem with the Right to Life organization?
    Their Advisory and Critique-
    The Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops’ advisory listed three conflicts with the pro-life organization:

    • Pro-life reform: “Texas Right to Life often opposes the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops and has implied that the bishops do not faithfully represent Church teaching. Part of the dispute is rooted in Texas Right to Life’s rejection of incremental pro-life reforms …”

    • End-of-life reform: “The bishops have been compelled to publicly correct Texas Right to Life’s misstatements on end-of-life care and advance directives, in which Texas Right to Life implied that the legislation the bishops were supporting allowed euthanasia and death panels rather than the reality that the legislation reflected the long-standing church teaching requiring a balance of patient autonomy and the physician conscience protection.”

    • Texas Right to Life’s voter guide: “Finally, Texas Right to Life publishes a scorecard that purports to show which Texas legislators are pro-life. We believe this publication is not based on a fair analysis of a legislator’s work, but rather upon whether the legislator has followed voting recommendations of Texas Right to Life.”

    So now we should have “incremental pro-life reforms”–gradualism–at what–a snails pace?
    Note-Texas prolife reforms have been microscopic/ dismal vs other states.
    Texas Bishops-
    By what moral basis or overt evil done do you Banish a Pro Life organization from parishes in Texas?
    Why? If there is no moral or Catholic dogma violated–is not your action purely political?

    see more

    Avatar

    Wow. Gotta watch this one again. Not certain I understood or followed it fully.
    Thanks for keeping up with things, Michael. We definitely need your work.

    Avatar

    The modernist bishops have been in bed with progressives for decades. Look at the fools who were arrested on Capitol Hill last week for the “Catholic Day of Action for Dreamers.” Sisters and priests were “standing in solidarity” with the illegal aliens. Thomas Reese, SJ (pal of James Martin, SJ) looked like a complete tool getting dragged out by security. What an embarrassment they are.

    Avatar

    I thought there was a move (Trump Administration) to end the Johnson Amendent so that Churches could participate in the public square without losing their tax exempt status?

    Avatar

    The Lucifarian objective to control then destroy THE CHURCH is in It’s final stages.
    “You cannot serve both God and Mamon,” and the church leadership appears to serve “Mamon” rather than God.

    Avatar

    So two-faced: so that they were not compelled to say you must vote for the prolife Repubican over the prodeath prohomosexual pro abortion Demoncrat, the bishops hid behind the Johnson Amendment. What they have now done shows how desperate they are. They have also just lit a fire under many of the anti-catholic prolife folks in Texas who will now vote for whoever is running against a bishop’s anti-life RINO candidate. By their actions they have doomed their RINOs to extinction; and may Texas Right To Life hasten that extinction.

    Of course in many areas, these bishops in democrat clothing were silent, but their silence was a loud and pointed implicit endorsement of democrats, candidates of the Party Of Death. From pulpits around Texas, the faithful heard from their alleged shepherds “We are not single issue voters,” that unsaid single issue being the murders daily, weekly yearly in Texas of hundreds of thousands of Texas babies, the murders being the overt policy of the democrats of the Party Of Death.

    In many places on any given day, all the murdered babies, ten, twenty, thirty, 100%, were Hispanic-American babies. For years, the Texas Conference of bishops have been silent about this brown genocide. Since Roe, 60,000,000 murdered babies in the US, and astoundingly, half, 30,000,000, were the children of minority mamas. Half. The democrat Party of Death RETA policy was demonically successful in getting rid of Sanger’s brown and black “human weeds.” (RETA: racial eugenic targeted abortion).

    Still the Catholic bishops of Texas have remained silent. Hand-in-glove with the democrats and profeath RINOs in their Texas alliance for death, they have not said from pulpits to vote for a prolife candidate instead of a party-of-death candidate, because the prolife candidate was – horror of horrors – a republican candidate. Never mind that the democrat candidate supported the murder of babies, and the RETA policy.

    But last week, mirabile dictu, wonder of wonders, the bishops speak! What could have spurred them to finally speak out – since they have never had the moral courage to say, as Peter did to the leaders of the time, “We can obey you, or we can obey God” ? Why speak out now when Hispanic-Americans are beginning to see the light and are beginning to vote for prolilfe folks to help save babies in Texas?

    The bishops have become painfully aware that their Texas alliance for death with the democrats and profeath RINOs is in danger. They saw what happened in 2016 in the Texas Rio Grande Valley when the Hispanic-American Catholics were shown how the Democrat RETA policy had decimated their numbers right here in Texas. And then the final horror – these enlightened voters, who love their children and live and die for family, they voted for Republicans. You could hear the weeping and the gnashing of prelates’ teeth from Brownsville to McAllen to Austin to Fort Worth to Houston – and even in El Paso.

    So the previously silent bishops, fearing that their Texas alliance for death partnership with the democrats would fail to deliver the once- rock-solid monolith of the Hispanic-American vote, in their desperation, loudly again proclaiming they must keep silent, have come out and condemned the quintessential Texas prolife organization, Texas Right To Life, because of its efforts – wildly successful efforts – to speak the truth about the brown genocide of Texas babies promoted by the Party Of Death democrats and Texas Right To Life’s support of non-democrat non-RETA-policy candidates; and Yes, most of them, hated non-RINO republicans.

    Lastly gasping, the bishops speak now days before the upcoming elections. Coincidence? No way, Jose. If Texas Right To Life and others like minded are to be stopped, if the Texas alliance for death is to succeed as it has in the past to elect democrats and RINO prodeath GOP candidates, the bishops had to speak out now – and it will be no surprise when they forsake these little ones in Fall 2018 again silently proclaiming we cannot endorse anyone.

    Didn’t Jesus say something about “woe” to those who hurt His children? Millstones, necks and drowning? And about hirelings, masquerading as shepherds, who run away, leaving the innocent sheep to the wolves?
    Guy McClung, Texas

    see more

      Avatar

      Didn’t President Trump say as a candidate that he wanted to have the Johnson Amendment repealed? Is that in the works? Would it be too late for this mishap?

      Avatar

      I here I was thinking Texas was a conservative state. This is also proof how the “seamless garment” has covered Texas as well – being that it started in Chicago. Like any garment, the USCCB appears to have kept adding to the garment by “weaving in” more issues “social justice” issues. Now, it looks like the garment has “blanketed” the WHOLE state of Texas. Now that’s ONE BIG seamless garment – even by Texas standards!

        Avatar

        This is why Texans need to protect their state from liberals moving here and bringing their blue demographics to make our state purple. Keep fighting conservative pro-life Texans and take nothing for granted!

    Avatar

    What really burns my buttons here is that the Texas bishops CLEARLY believe that the laity is so poorly formed as to believe that we owe our bishops absolute obedience.

    Well, Bishop Olsen, Saint Thomas Aquinas…says otherwise.

    And you know what? I think I’ll go with him – rather than a man who uses TWITTER to get parishioners to RAT OUT THEIR OWN PRIESTS! 😡

    Saint Thomas Aquinas: There being an imminent danger for the Faith, prelates must be questioned, even publicly, by their subjects.

    ALSO…pray, pray, PRAY for our good and holy priests in Texas, on the receiving end of yet more “blue on blue” fire from their superiors.

    They DO take a vow of obedience to the bishop – and he can (and often does) make their lives a misery. 😢

    Avatar

    Well, if you want sensible immigration, the end to abortion, and parental rights to guide the raising and educating of your children to remain with the parents– you probably won’t vote for ANYONE that the Bishops in Texas want in office. Oh and if you are seriously in favor of the 1st and 2nd amendments of the US Constitution, well, anyone BUT those chosen by the Bishops.

    Avatar

    Pray for the challengers to win their elections.

    Avatar

    Did these bishops support Abortion Barbie, Wendy Davis?

    Avatar

    If i say what i want to say some people would have a heart attack.So i will pray.

      Avatar

      many of us know exactly what you mean. Have deleted way more comments than I post because I didn’t want to have to go to confession for a stupid internet posting.

    Avatar

    These modernist bishops are forgetting whose Church it truly is. I would like to think that Our Lord is offering a correction to the bishops with this chain of events. I remember being taught that in order to be a good Catholic, one follows the laws of the land in which he or she resides. To my recollection, “illegal” was not a part of that.

    Avatar

    Fort Worth is home to a very strong and vital conservative movement among Episcopalians who are, as it turns out, more Catholic than the Catholics.

    “Some of you will grab hold of a relative and say, ‘You still have a coat. Be our leader and rule this heap of ruins.'”

    Avatar

    Forgive me if this is foolishness that I haven’t thought through well enough, but if the Church lost its tax-exempt status and essentially was bankrupted wouldn’t that actually be more a positive thing for the faithful? To lose it’s temporal power in this way would make all the money and power hungry people in the Church “give up the ghost” so to speak and it would leave the faithful behind which would in turn be far more powerful and outspoken.

      Avatar

      The Johnson Amendment needs to be repealed so that the Church can have exempt status AND speak up for Life and Morals…..

      Avatar

      Except that suddenly the power of government to control the Church via taxation would be let loose to the delight of the devil. No, the Faithful need to get over the clericalism and BE Catholic in spite of the hierarchy being off the tracks. If the Faithful ignore the bishops unless they speak correctly on some aspect of the Faith, well, that will help greatly– the Faithful thinking for themselves and applying Church teaching.

    Avatar

    A very clear explanation of what is going on in Texas politics. Thank you, Michael! Maybe this is the end of the money grab by the bishops who support illegal immigration for the government funds. They have abandoned our unborn for those who break the law.

    Avatar

    “And friends, our seventh collection this morning is for the [fill in name of bogus charity] fund. Please remember those less fortunate than us. Er, I mean, you.”

    Avatar

    If the Bishops would stay the course and teach the True Authentic Faith, the church wouldnt be in this mess. Watch what comes next, the Vatican will send experts from Germany with all the answers about paying taxes, as they did to Chile. The only difference is the trip to Texas would be about money and not sex with Children as in Chile.

      Avatar

      “It all depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is”. P. Francis is maneuvering to create a world socialist Church based on the writings of Teilhard de Chardin. Capitalism needs to be removed in the U.S. in order to prepare the way for that utopian ideal.– Francis has stated that abortion is caused by the greed of Western capitalist influences. By rejecting original sin, he believes that if you remove capitalism, then there will be no need for abortion.

    Avatar

    Bishops all over the world have betrayed their office due to wealth and riches. It would probably do the Church some good to shed itself of money and modernisation and get back to teaching the Faith.

    Avatar

    “For the desire of money is the root of all evils; which some coveting have erred from the faith, and have entangled themselves in many sorrows.” 1 Timothy 6:10

    Avatar

    Maybe the Church should lose its tax-exempt status. That free the shackles and permit good priests and bishops to speak the truth more openly.

    Avatar

    The monkeys have bullet holes in their feet.

    Avatar

    Very Informative..

 

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES

  1. vasheepdog94 says:

    So Once again Texas Bishops go off somewhere else. What the heck Texas Bishops? Do you even give a damn about the Church? What? You say you want to know more? There’s this blog, Called Abyssum. The Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi is very wise, and should be learned from by many. He will even submit to instruction by Cardinal Burke. Hey Texas Bishops this Bishop just had eye surgery and you are rambling about how anti Catholic you are? Wow.

    Um, hello Bishops, what the heck are you doing??? Doesn’t seem to humble to do this!!!! Don’t let Francis fool you. We have a Pope who taught us clear!!!! He goes by “Emeritus”, although maybe the Emeritus Title means he’s still the Pope!!!! Hmmm. Maybe Francis is administrator, but is administrating very badly. Kind of, but not exactly like Bishop Gracida is Bishop Emeritus but is still a Bishop. Although in this case, he has fullness of Bishop, and legitimately retired from administration, but not the office and he keeps the entire office. The Texas Bishops, well, I won’t say because they are Bishops, but they could be heretics. I will leave that to a trained Theologian/cleric. It is interesting, that some of those who are “Emeritus” have the Faith, some who have the administration are not administrating properly!!!! (If I am wrong this comment will be edited by Bishop Gracida in a follow up comment)

    Looks like you picked up the comment section in the repost from the Original article, so nice to see that you included that. I didn’t have time to go through it right now, but I will.

    Who are those Bishops to judge us? Haha. Use their own words against them without being violent or inciting violence. That is why we here on this Blog have the Truth with kindness.

    LONG LIVE THE SHEEPDOG!!! LONG LIVE THE GRACIDA!!! LONG LIVE EVERYONE!!!

  2. Mary Deliduka says:

    You are right; stupid is as stupid does!!! This is so hard to believe that the Texas bishops would be this stupid! We need to be on our knees praying for Texas…and our Church… God help us!!!
    Dear Lady of Guadalupe , pray for us !

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: