Democrat Dershowitz demolishes the Democrat assault on the Constitution by the House’s abuse of the grounds “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress” citing the Bolton story as irrelevant to the current impeachment process

Dershowitz Launches Crushing Defense Against Dems in Impeachment Trial: ‘The Wrong Criteria’

This is the argument the Senate – and the country – needed to hear.

Day 2 of President Donald Trump’s impeachment defense Monday brought famed attorney Alan Deshowitz to explain the kind of assault on the Constitution that characterizes the Democratic impeachment attempt on the grounds of “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress.”

Advertisement – story continues below

And he used some of the biggest names in American history to do it.RNC Research@RNCResearch

Dershowitz lists Presidents that would have been impeached under Democrats’ “view of the Constitution” 

Embedded video

701Twitter Ads info and privacy459 people are talking about this

Going back to the earliest days of the Republic, Dershowitz noted that presidents beginning with George Washington could have faced impeachment under the loose, patently unconstitutional standards being used by Democrats in the 21st century.

TRENDING: Sex Offender Defends His Child Porn Collection by Claiming To Identify as Girl, 8

The self-acknowledged supporter of Hillary Clinton, Trump’s Democratic rival in the 2016 election, stressed to the senators that impeachment was a remedy established by the Founders for behavior so extreme it was beyond the normal boundaries of politics in a democracy.

Advertisement – story continues below

From Washington and fellow Founders Thomas Jefferson and John Adams through Republicans like Abraham Lincoln and Democrats like Franklin Roosevelt, Dershowitz said, presidents have been accused by political opponents of abusing their power — however, the answer was not in a radical impeachment drive, but in working for their defeat in constitutional elections.

“I’m sorry, House managers, you just picked the wrong criteria. You picked the most dangerous possible criteria to serve as a precedent for how we supervise and oversee future presidents,” Dershowitz said.Do you think impeachment will hurt Democrats more than President Trump in the November election?Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Naturally, thanks to a conveniently timed leak to The New York Times (the anti-Trump “newspaper of record”), Dershowitz was forced to address the story that former National Security Adviser John Bolton has written a bookthat supports Democratic charges that Trump abused his power by withholding military aid to the country of Ukraine by demanding it investigate corruption allegations that could involve former Vice President Joe Biden.

As Dershowitz described it, the Bolton story might or might not be serious, but it’s essentially irrelevant to an impeachment trial — with the potential to overturn the results of a presidential election.

“If a president, any president, were to have done what The Times reported about the content of the Bolton manuscript, that would not constitute an impeachable offense,” Dershowitz said.

Advertisement – story continues below

“Let me repeat: Nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true, would rise to the level of an abuse of power or impeachable offense. That is clear from the history. That is clear from the language of the Constitution.”Rep Andy Biggs@RepAndyBiggsAZ

“Nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true, would rise to the level of an abuse of power or an impeachable offense.

That is clear from the history.

That is clear from the language of the Constitution.” – @AlanDersh

Embedded video

2,270Twitter Ads info and privacy1,148 people are talking about this

RELATED: Huckabee: Too Bad Romney’s Not President — Then He Could Be Impeached

And that is the heart of the matter.

Advertisement – story continues below


The Highest Paying Cash Back Card Of 2020 Has Hit The MarketBy Revcontent

What Democrats are doing now is turning their destructive, deranged dislike for Trump and the revolution he’s brought to American politics into an attempt to drive him from office that’s dressed up in constitutional finery.

But that finery can’t disguise the inherently undemocratic nature of the Democratic effort.

The place to settle political differences is in a political campaign and the November election.

Just because Democrats are clearly afraid they won’t win that campaign is no excuse to indulge in a poorly veiled assault on the Constitution that comes close to qualifying as a coup.

Advertisement – story continues below

Democrats might think the rules are different because the president is Donald Trump, but the lesson Dershowitz, a retired Harvard law professor, was teaching was that the precedent they are trying to set now would shake the constitutional system at its foundation of co-equal branches of government.

Personal political preferences are not the issue, he said.

“I stand against the application, and misapplication, of the constitutional criteria in every case and against every president without regard to whether I support his or her parties or policies,” he said.Tom Elliott@tomselliott

.@AlanDersh: “I would be making the very same constitutional argument, had Hillary Clinton, for whom I voted, had been elected, and a Republican House had voted to impeach her on these unconstitutional grounds”

Embedded video

1,316Twitter Ads info and privacy521 people are talking about this

Advertisement – story continues below

That’s the reality of it. Even a Hillary Clinton supporter like Dershowitz sees the inherent danger of an impeachment process that seeks to make Congress supreme over the presidency, regardless of whether the current president is a man most Clinton supporters despise.

The stakes of the Trump impeachment are higher than any so-called revelations from Bolton, higher than Trump himself, and considerably higher than the benighted political aspirations of swamp dwellers such as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her flying monkeys in the mainstream media.

That was the argument Dershowitz was making, and it’s just what the Senate — and the country — needed to hear.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.Submit a Correction
Share on FacebookTweetEmailPrint

Joe SaundersStory EditorSummary More Info Recent Posts ContactJoe has spent more than 30 years as a reporter, copy editor and metro desk editor in newsrooms in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Florida. He’s been with Liftable Media since 2015.

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.