Texas Rejects Biden’s Sexual Politics September 21, 2021 Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on the Biden administration’s latest example of sexual politics: On September 20, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration in an attempt to stop a June 15 guidance, or legal notice, by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on the rights of transgender persons. The EEOC says it is authorized to make a wide-ranging decision on the rights of transgender persons, leaning on the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County for legitimacy. Texas disagrees saying that the EEOC is guilty of overreach, assuming powers it was never granted by this high court ruling. According to the EEOC, relying on Bostock, it is empowered to force employers to allow biological persons to dress as a member of the opposite sex. However, as the Texas brief points out, there are state agencies that have a dress code, and if an employee were to dress as a member of the opposite sex, it would violate its standards. Texas also objects to the EEOC directive that says employers must respect the right of biological persons to use the bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers of the opposite sex, meaning that males could use the facilities reserved for women. The EEOC also seeks to force employers and employees to call persons of the opposite sex by the pronouns of their choice, so that it would be a violation not to call a woman who identifies as a man “he/him,” or even “they/them,” despite the fact that such nomenclature is biologically and grammatically illiterate. Texas not only refuses to discipline workers for these alleged infractions, it insists that the guidance violates the free speech rights of employees. Does Bostock give the EEOC the powers it claims it has? No one disagrees that Bostock concluded that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bars discrimination on the basis of race and sex, applies to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. This clearly means that no one can be fired from the workplace for simply being a homosexual or a transgender person. But what about dress codes, males showering with females, and transgender speech codes? They are not even hinted at in Title VII. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who wrote the majority decision in Bostock, anticipated the first two concerns, and sought to alleviate fears that they could be justified on the basis of this ruling. “The employers worry that our decision will sweep beyond Title VII to other federal or state laws that prohibit sex discrimination. And, under Title VII itself, they say sex-segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes will prove unsustainable after our decision today. But none of these other laws are before us; we have not had the benefit of adversarial testing about the meaning of their terms, and we do not prejudge any such questions today. Under Title VII, too, we do not purport to address bathrooms, locker rooms, or anything else of the kind.” In other words, the EEOC is deliberately ignoring the plain language of Bostock by granting itself the authority that is nowhere sanctioned in this Supreme Court ruling. As for forcing employees to yield their First Amendment right to free speech, the word “pronouns” is nowhere mentioned by Gorsuch; he is agnostic on this issue. The Texas lawsuit also contends that the Fourteenth Amendment does not permit the federal government to “substantively redefine a State’s constitutional obligations.” It argues that this is exactly what the EEOC power grab does. Very few Americans want to see people discriminated against on the basis of any conventional demographic characteristic, but when it comes to matters involving privacy and modesty—to say nothing of looming sexual assault issues—that is a different story. Moreover, telling people what linguistic terms they must use in addressing coworkers is draconian. The contempt that President Biden has for respecting elemental standards of decency, as well as his dismissal of our First Amendment right to free speech, did not begin with his administration’s twisted interpretation of Bostock. It began on his first day in office. On January 20, 2021, our “devout Catholic” president signed an executive order saying that biological persons can use the bathroom and locker room of their choice. On the same day, the White House website was updated to allow visitors to use whatever pronouns they want, thus setting the table for transgender-pronoun mandates in the workplace. Never before has there been a presidential administration so determined to promote sexual engineering, complete with a wholesale disregard for freedom of speech. It is becoming increasingly clear that Biden is an abolitionist of the worst kind: he is bent on abolishing the nature-based differences between men and women. Moreover, he will punish those who do not adopt his sexually correct lexicon. At a minimum, we need to know more about who is advising him on these issues. This is especially urgent given that it is becoming more obvious by the day that he is not in full command of his faculties. |
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
-
Recent Posts
- FIRST IMPRESSIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS VALID, HOWEVER THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT NOW THAT MY FIRST IMPRESSION OF JORGE BERGOLIO WAS VALID AND EVERYTHING SINCE THEN HAS SERVED TO CONFIRM THE VALIDITY OF MY FIRST IMPRESSION OF HIM
- WHEN JORGE BERGOLIO WALKED OUT ON THE BALCONY OF SAINT PETER BASILICA IMMEDIATELY AFTER OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE CONCLAVE IMPROPERLY DRESSED AND FLANKED BY TWO MEN WHO WERE KNOWN OR SUSPECTED TO BE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE GROWING SCANDAL OF HOMOSEXUAL PERVERSION IN THE CHURCH AND THEY WERE ASSISTED BY ONE OF THE PONTIFICAL MASTERS OF CEREMONIES WHO WAS ASSISTNG ME TO BE VESTED TO CELEBRATE THE PILGRIMS MASS IN SAINT PETERS BASILICA THE PREVIOUS HOLY YEAR WHO LEFT ME STANDING WAITING TO PUT ON THE CHASUBLE WHILE HE KISSED A NEW SERVER ON THE LIPS. I WAS NOT ALONE IN IMMEDIATELY QUESTIONING THE VALIDITY OF THE ELECTION OF BERGOLIO TO THE CHAIR OF SAINT PETER
- SAN FRANCISCO ARCHBISHOP SALVATORE CORDILEONE IS ENFORCING THE CANON 915 PENALTY OF NOT PRESENTING HERSELF FOR THE RECEPTION OF HOLY COMMUNION
- THE DEVIL MAKES AN APPEARANCE CANADA
- THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!
Top Posts & Pages
- WHEN JORGE BERGOLIO WALKED OUT ON THE BALCONY OF SAINT PETER BASILICA IMMEDIATELY AFTER OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE CONCLAVE IMPROPERLY DRESSED AND FLANKED BY TWO MEN WHO WERE KNOWN OR SUSPECTED TO BE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE GROWING SCANDAL OF HOMOSEXUAL PERVERSION IN THE CHURCH AND THEY WERE ASSISTED BY ONE OF THE PONTIFICAL MASTERS OF CEREMONIES WHO WAS ASSISTNG ME TO BE VESTED TO CELEBRATE THE PILGRIMS MASS IN SAINT PETERS BASILICA THE PREVIOUS HOLY YEAR WHO LEFT ME STANDING WAITING TO PUT ON THE CHASUBLE WHILE HE KISSED A NEW SERVER ON THE LIPS. I WAS NOT ALONE IN IMMEDIATELY QUESTIONING THE VALIDITY OF THE ELECTION OF BERGOLIO TO THE CHAIR OF SAINT PETER
- FIRST IMPRESSIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS VALID, HOWEVER THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT NOW THAT MY FIRST IMPRESSION OF JORGE BERGOLIO WAS VALID AND EVERYTHING SINCE THEN HAS SERVED TO CONFIRM THE VALIDITY OF MY FIRST IMPRESSION OF HIM
- SAN FRANCISCO ARCHBISHOP SALVATORE CORDILEONE IS ENFORCING THE CANON 915 PENALTY OF NOT PRESENTING HERSELF FOR THE RECEPTION OF HOLY COMMUNION
- THE DEVIL MAKES AN APPEARANCE CANADA
- WHY DO INTELLIGENT MEN PURSUE THE APPLICATION OF AN OBSOLETE CONCEPT "UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE" TO THE PROBLEM OF THE INVALIDITY OF THE PAPACY OF FRANCIS THE MERCIFUL IN THIS DAY AND AGE OF INSTANT ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AROUND THE WORLD
- THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!
- AN OVERVIEW OF WHERE WE HAVE BEEN, WHERE WE ARE AT NOW, AND WHERE WE ARE GOING IN THE NEAR FUTURE
- STOP THE WORLD; LORD HAVE MERCY!
- THE AWAKENING OF MISS PRIM
- 2 ABOUT ME
Top Clicks