!!!!
When the Law says, “You shall not covet,” these words mean that we should banish our desires for whatever does not belong to us.. Our thirst for another’s goods is immense, infinite, never quenched. Thus it is written: “He who loves money never has money enough” – Roman Catechism, III, 37
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Occupiers, Tea Partiers, and the Tenth Commandment
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
November 2, 2011
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/10624/occupy-wall-street-and-the-flouting-of-the-tenth
Protesters clash with police at the ‘Occupy Denver’ site on October 29. |
AT THE OCCUPY PHOENIX demonstrations, fliers encourage protesters to violently resist police officers, asserting that “you will usually have only two options: submit, or kill the cop.” At Zuccotti Park in Manhattan, an Occupy Wall Street protester was sexually assaulted in her tent; according to the New York Post, a woman was raped at the same site a few weeks earlier. In Denver, “Occupy” activists turned on the police, screaming obscenities and knocking a motorcycle cop to the ground. Occupy Oakland grew even more violent, as police were pelted with bottles and rocks, and had M-80 firecrackers thrown at them. And in cities from Boston to Berkeley, Occupy encampments have coincided with surges in vandalism, assault, and theft.
Some individuals have strained to compare the Occupy Wall Street protests to the Tea Party movement. “They’re not that different,” President Obama told ABC’s Jake Tapper. “Both on the left and the right, I think people feel separated from their government.” The Daily Show’s host Jon Stewart argued: “Here’s a group of Americans, disenchanted, railing against big government bailouts…. These protesters, how are they not like the Tea Party?”
But the contrast between the Occupiers and the Tea Partiers could hardly be greater. Tea Party rallies haven’t turned public squares into squalid slums or incited protesters to curse the police. What the Occupy movement descended to in less than two months — the hundreds of arrests, the vandalism, the anti-Semitic rants, the all-night drumming, the public urination — is like nothing the American public saw in more than two years of Tea Party activism.
That isn’t a fluke. When you flout the Tenth Commandment — “Thou shalt not covet” — things are apt to get ugly.
The ranks of both the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street are filled with the frustrated and the fed-up; both movements seek dramatic change in the nation’s policies. But the values that propel them are poles apart. The Tea Partiers advocate limited government, personal responsibility, lower taxes, and economic freedom, all within a framework of constitutional restraint. What the Occupiers appear to want above all is to punish the wealthy, to demonize corporations, and to wallow in their own victimhood and sense of entitlement. They claim to represent “the 99 percent.” Many would like to “Shut Down the 1 Percent.”
Such class hostility pervades the Occupy movement. It is ubiquitous among the signs and chants at the demonstrations (“Wall Street Is Our Street,” “Tax the Millionaires,” “Human Need, Not Corporate Greed”). It is echoed by media cheerleaders as well. Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson last week condemned income growth among the highest-earning Americans as “theft,” while NBC’s David Gregory observed that the Occupiers’ demands “dovetail nicely” into Obama’s “big message … of going after Wall Street and the banks, talking about unfairness.”
Democratic pollster Douglas Schoen, interviewing some 200 Zuccotti Park protesters, found that most of them share “a deep commitment to left-wing politics: opposition to free-market capitalism and support for radical redistribution of wealth.” They favor stiffer taxes on the wealthy (77 percent) and more regulation of business (70 percent), and 31 percent say they would engage in violence to advance their agenda.
The violence is not tangential to the agenda. As the mounting hooliganism at Occupy encampments suggests, where class resentment takes root, predatory lawbreaking frequently follows. When politicians rail against “millionaires and billionaires,” when social-activist campaigns scapegoat the “1 percent,” it is only a matter of time before thugs feel emboldened to steal, rape, and worse. Class envy is not benign. At its most extreme — the communist tyrannies of Lenin and Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot — it unleashed the bloodiest genocides of the 20th century.
Economic envy may cloak itself in rhetoric about “inequality” or “egalitarianism” or “redistribution of wealth,” but its oldest name is covetousness. That is the sin enjoined by the last of the Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, or his manservant, or his maidservant, or his ox, or his ass, or anything that is thy neighbor’s.”
A young couple visiting the area look on as demonstrators with ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protest at Zuccotti Park in New York. |
At first blush it may seem odd that God would ban a mere desire. After all, the other nine commandments concern behavior: idolatry, theft, perjury, and so on. But as a matter of moral and social hygiene, the Tenth Commandment is indispensable. Covetousness — particularly when it takes the form of class hatred — is the root of innumerable other evils. From the belief that you don’t have enough because others have too much, it isn’t that great a stretch to the belief that those who have too much should be forced to make do with less. It shouldn’t be surprising when a movement obsessed with what rich capitalists earn rather than with what they produce starts treating other people’s property and persons with contempt.
Occupy Wall Street preaches that the “1 percent” got rich by exploiting the “99 percent.” The Tea Party believes that with greater freedom and less government, we could all be more prosperous and productive. One is rooted in envy, the other in self-respect. What distinguishes them, you might say, is the culture of the Tenth Commandment. That distinction is showing up in many ways, not least in the latest police reports.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe. His website is www.JeffJacoby.com).
Protesters clash with police at the ‘Occupy Denver’ site on October 29.
A young couple visiting the area look on as demonstrators with ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protest at Zuccotti Park in New York.
Jesus felt close to the poor and taught: “Blessed are the poor.” But this is something that so-called Christians in the Occupy Movement cannot even fathom. Why? Because they have no sense of the supernatural. Their Christianity, where it even exists, has been filtered through 400 years of naturalistic, materialistic philosophical error. They are post-Freudian [psychology without a soul] Christians. They are post Feuerbach/Marx [no salvation but material salvation] Christians. They are post Dilthey [no truth but historical truth] Christians. They are post Sartre [Logos=nothingness] Christians. And they are post Bultmann [Christ is a myth] Christians. It takes a spiritual person to understand materialism. These protestors follow the Gospel of John Maynard Keynes and Karl Marx: religion without God, messianism without the Messiah, man without soul, eschatology without Logos. How can they criticize materialism when they themselves are materialists? It’s “blessed are the poor,” not “cursed are the poor.”
@ Anthony Emmel
I am fully in agreement with your second comment. On behalf of Jeff Jacoby I accept your apology.
You are right about the difference in the levels of compensation. The greater scandal is the current practice of awarding incredibly large bonuses to corporate executives. The greatest sandal is when those excessive bonuses are awarded to executives of failing corporations.
This is true. a group is not a monolithic block. It is organic and made of many parts. Just like there are people who say that are Tea Partiers (?) that are racists. I’ve talked with them at gun shows and some of them are in my own family. {sigh}
I’m quite sure there are plenty of Occupiers (?) who are socialists and want “the Man” to come down. But there are plenty who disgusted by the wage disparity. when I was born in 1970, the ratio of CEO to avergae worker salary was 45: 1. It is now 1733:1. that’s a little…excessive.
And mea culpa. I thought the CCC quote at the top was part of the article. My apologies to Mr. Jacoby. 🙂
@ Anthony Emmel
Good point, Anthony! However, in defense of Jeff Jacoby, he is a Jew and he was quoting scripture like a good Jew, not a Protestant. Also, it would seem that the Latin saying is applicable to the Occupy Wall Street protesters: tot homines quot setentiae, there are as many different points of the protesters as there are protesters. From what I have heard from the mouths of some of the protesters there is a lot of envy of rich people.
As long as we’re quoting Holy Scripture like the Protestants and entirely missing the point of the protesters:
Proverbs, ch. 22:
[16] He that oppresseth the poor, to increase his own riches, shall himself give to one that is richer, and shall be in need. [17] Incline thy ear, and hear the words of the wise: and apply thy heart to my doctrine: [18] Which shall be beautiful for thee, if thou keep it in thy bowels, and it shall flow in thy lips: [19] That thy trust may be in the Lord, wherefore I have also shewn it to thee this day. [20] Behold I have described it to thee three manner of ways, in thoughts and knowledge:
[21] That I might shew thee the certainty, and the words of truth, to answer out of these to them that sent thee. [22] Do no violence to the poor, because he is poor: and do not oppress the needy in the gate: [23] Because the Lord will judge his cause, and will afflict them that have afflicted his soul.