THE LATENT SCHISM BEGINS TO SHOW ITSELF

shipwreck

The New Oxford Review

18 November 16

[ Emphasis and {commentary} in red type by Abyssum ]

The debate over Amoris Laetitia has intensified, after Pope Francis suggested that some responses do not understand the document.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Avvenire, partially translated by La Stampa, the Pope criticised “a certain legalism.” He said that responses to Amoris Laetitia exemplified this, and that some people thought issues were “black and white, even though it is in the course of life that we are called to discern”.

The Pope added: “The Council told us this, but historians say that a century needs to pass before a Council is properly assimilated into the body of the Church… we are half way.”

It comes after four senior cardinals asked the Pope to clarify Amoris Laetitia. In a letter to the Pope, Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Caffarra, Walter Brandmüller and Joachim Meisner submitted five “dubia” – a traditional way of asking for clarification.

The cardinals asked the Pope whether certain Church teachings about Communion and the moral law, which Amoris Laetitia discusses ambiguously, are still valid.

These included the doctrine that the divorced and remarried cannot receive Communion unless living as brother and sister, and the doctrine that some acts are intrinsically wrong.

The submission of “dubia” invites a yes-or-no answer. In this case, it was a question of whether the Pope thought some teachings, especially Catholic doctrine on the moral law, should still be regarded as true.

The letter was sent in September, but the Pope has not replied. The cardinals said they took this as an invitation to publish the letter and let the debate continue in public.

In an interview with the Vatican journalist Edward Pentin, Cardinal Burke said that if the Pope remained silent, it might be necessary to issue a “formal act of correction of a serious error”.

Pentin told EWTN yesterday: “I do understand, from sources within [the Pope’s residence] Santa Marta, that the Pope is not happy at all, that he’s quite at his…boiling with rage.” Fr Antonio Spadaro, an associate of the Pope, has dismissed these reports.

This weekend, the Pope will officially appoint new cardinals at a meeting known as a consistory. However, he has cancelled the usual pre-consistory session where cardinals raise issues of concern. No reason has been given, but there is speculation that other cardinals might have wanted to ask about the dubia.

Cardinal-designate Joseph Tobin, who will be created a cardinal at the consistory, told the Tablet that he thought the four cardinals’ letter was “at best naive”.

Meanwhile, two American archbishops have clashed over implementation of Amoris Laetitia.

Archbishop Charles Chaput has issued guidelines for his own archdiocese of Philadelphia, in which he says that the divorced and remarried should be treated with mercy. He also restates the Church’s teaching that they may not receive Communion unless they endeavour to live as brother and sister.

In an interview with Catholic News Service, Cardinal-designate Kevin Farrell criticised the guidelines, saying: “I don’t share the view of what Archbishop Chaput did, no.” Cardinal-designate Farrell said: “It is better to say to the couple, ‘Let’s work together and let’s walk together’ – as Pope Francis would say – ‘through this process and see how far we arrive.’”

The Catholic Church cannot react by “closing the doors before we even listen to the circumstances and the people,” the cardinal-designate said. “That’s not the way to go.”

In response, Archbishop Chaput told Catholic News Service: “I wonder if Cardinal-designate Farrell actually read and understood the Philadelphia guidelines he seems to be questioning. The guidelines have a clear emphasis on mercy and compassion. This makes sense because individual circumstances are often complex. Life is messy. But mercy and compassion cannot be separated from truth and remain legitimate virtues.

“The Church cannot contradict or circumvent Scripture and her own magisterium without invalidating her mission. This should be obvious. The words of Jesus himself are very direct and radical on the matter of divorce.”

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to THE LATENT SCHISM BEGINS TO SHOW ITSELF

  1. Even the bishops opposing heresy have adopted the modernist language. What is this thing called “walking together”, as relating to a person’s salvation? How is encouraging a person to disobey God for the sake of his convenience (conveniently renamed “the good of the children”) an act of love?
    Jorge Bergoglio has long been an advocate of sin. He has despised and openly bashed a virtuous life as suspicious and hypocritical. One deduces that especially the saints must have been hypocrites – choosing obedience to God against the instincts of the flesh.

    But even in this Bergoglio is very deceptive. He supports sexual immorality (Anal intercourse is now a special gift of diversity to the Church; One wonders how much longer before paedophiles and zoophiles are named as God’s gift to us), while plotting with globalist to redistribute the world’s wealth, which means – steal and demoralize for the sake of a murderous ideology. He knows very well that these people are planning to take over the earth’s resources for the fulfilment of their plan to rule over humanity, and not for the benefit of the people. He seeks advise from those who impose birth control, sterilization, abortion, and sodomy as means to cut down on population growth (while simultaneously promoting the islamization of the West as an antidote against low birth-rates).
    He knows, while promoting an individual “inner forum” in decision-making on matters of excitable genitalia, that his global justice is a crackdown on the right (and God-ordained duty) to follow one’s conscience in all decision-making, including on how one spends his money. He is of the same mind as George Soros – one of the world’s most dangerous psychopaths and criminals,

    I will risk to claim that engaging in sexual immorality is more dangerous than caring for one’s own family, providing for one’s own children more than for someone far away. Yet Bergoglio preaches that “Love your neighbour as yourself” must be replaced with: “Love your neighbour more than yourself”. He officially placed himself above God. I deduce that he doesn’t believe in God. He believes that we are all co-creators in the process of the universe’s evolution toward oneness.

  2. We must all pray that the majority of Cardinals & Bishops will come out of their hiding places & stand firmly behind the ‘Fab Four’ & affirm their loyalty to Christ & His Word which was for all people & all time.

Comments are closed.