People (including bishops) are being led around like a pig with a ring in his nose by the left/liberal Trump-hating media.

13 Facts the Media ‘Pros’ Don’t Want You to Know About ‘Family Border Separation’

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 13: (L-R) U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY), Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) march to the headquarters of U.S. Customs and Border Protection during a protest June 13, 2018 in Washington, …
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Brietbart News

The fire hose of fake news from the establishment media this week on the issue of illegal immigrant families separated at the border is designed to mislead the American people — and to distract from Trump’s recent successes.

Here are the facts — 13 truths the media do not want you to know about President Trump’s legal, humane, and moral handling of adults and childrenwho enter our country illegally.

  1. Trump Is Only Enforcing the Law

The establishment media’s manufactured narrative about the necessary and moral separation of illegal alien parents from their children is designed with the specific purpose of spreading the fake news that, only as a means to be cruel,  President Trump is somehow making all of this up as he goes along.

In truth, Trump is only complying with and enforcing the law, which is his constitutional duty and responsibility.

When the media claim Trump has a “choice,” what they mean is he has a choice to ignore the law as Obama did when he illegally released untold numbers of illegals into America.

Trump’s “zero tolerance policy” is merely his administration treating all lawbreakers as lawbreakers, because the only other option is to let them loose into America with nothing but a court summons.

  1. Trump’s Only Choice Is to Separate Illegal Alien Families

When an illegal alien crosses the border into the U.S., he is a lawbreaker, and, like any lawbreaker (including American citizens), he is put into the criminal justice system.

This is the law.

Obviously, when an illegal alien is in custody, he is housed in an adult detention center. For obvious reasons, it would be illegal for Trump to “reunite” this family by allowing children to live in adult detention centers.

Keep in mind that when we are this early in the process, we do not even know if this is a real family unit. It is not uncommon for illegal aliens (including criminals) to pretend the children they are traveling with are their own. They do so in the hope this special family status will result in them being released (this madness is known as “catch and release”) into America with nothing more than a court date — a date many never show for, most especially those with criminal intent.

And so, while the illegal adult is held in an adult detention center, the migrant child is cared for in shelters run by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Generally, the adult illegal is processed quickly, sentenced to time served, and the family is quickly reunited during the deportation process.

In other words, in order to keep the family unit together, we can either put children in adult detention centers (unthinkable), put adults in child detention centers (unthinkable), or hold no one, which means “catch and release,” which means letting even more illegal immigrants loose to live in our country illegally.

The only moral and legal option here is to temporarily separate families while the criminal justice system runs its course.

  1. The Left Wants Illegal Aliens to Enjoy Privileges Denied to American Citizens

If an American citizen breaks the law and is funneled into the justice system, he is separated from his family and children. This American citizen is not allowed to keep his family with him in a detention center.

Once again, our media want illegal aliens to enjoy special rights and privileges American citizens do not enjoy.

One more point…

These migrants are guilty of walking minor children through miles and miles of desert with the intent of committing a crime (crossing a border illegally).

If you or I walked a child through miles and miles of desert with the intent of committing a crime, child protective services would take our children away (and should).

  1. Asylum Seekers Not Breaking the Law are Not Being Separated

If you cross the border illegally and claim asylum, you are still a lawbreaker. Regardless of your intent, crossing the border illegally automatically puts you in the criminal justice system, where you will obviously be separated from family.

These asylum seekers are choosing to break the law, are choosing to be separated from family.

Asylum seekers who respect our laws, by turning themselves in at legal points of entry, are not being separated. Over-crowding due to the abuse of this policy might eventually make this impossible, but it is up to Congress to allocate more funds.

  1. Trump Is Correct About the Loophole

In 1997, a consent decree called the Flores Settlement made it illegal for America to hold migrant children for longer than 20 days. Meaning, in order to keep the family together after 20 days of detention, we can either reunite the family by letting them loose to live illegally in America, or we can keep the parent in detention and place the child in a foster home or with a relative who lives in America.

Trump is wisely choosing to do the latter (for a number of moral reasons I will explain later).

A case involving an illegal border crosser not seeking asylum is usually adjudicated before the 20 days are up, which means the family unit is reunited during deportation and no foster care is needed.  This, obviously, is the best case scenario.

Those who cross the border illegally and then claim asylum status (an important distinction from asylum seekers who obey the law) are another story, because the asylum process almost always exceeds the 20 days, and this is the law the Trump administration wants changed.

By speeding up the asylum process, the family unit can be reunited faster, either in the deportation process (if asylum is not granted — and this process is frequently abused) or in the resettlement process (if asylum is granted).

Another option is to end the 20-day limit so foster care does not become necessary. Parent and child can remain in the detention centers until the asylum process is settled.

  1. “Reuniting” Families Would Be a Disaster for Countless Children

Again, the only way to “keep a family together” is to allow illegals to pour into our country.

This policy would be a total disaster, especially for the children.

If word gets out that America automatically allows illegal border crossers with small children loose into America just because they have minor children, this would only further incentivize those who engage in the child abuse of dragging children along on the unbelievably dangerous trek across the border — or, even worse, both exploiting them for catch-and-release and then trafficking them after making it into the country.

No one who truly cares about these children wants to further incentivize that kind of abuse.

  1. Obama and Democrats Incentivized This ‘Family Separation’

Until Obama came along, illegal border crossings primarily involved young, single men. Obama incentivized the idea of dragging minor children along on this dangerous journey (where many children are sexually assaulted) through his policy of  “catch and release.”

Once word got out that illegals with small children would be let loose into America, the number of children crossing the border exploded.

Again, the last thing decent people want is for the American government to further incentivize the cruel act of bringing small children along on this brutal trip across the border, which is exactly what Trump is hoping to stop with his zero tolerance policy.

  1. Barack Obama Separated Illegal Alien Families, Media Said Nothing

Under Obama, when illegal border crossers were put into the criminal justice system, families were indeed separated. Obama, of course, rarely prosecuted, even though the law calls for it.

Neither Democrats nor the media cared about family separation then, which proves this manufactured and coordinated uproar is only about politics.

The only reason the media suddenly came to care about family separation is as a means to fabricate a controversy, as a tactic to distract voters from three legitimate news stories from last week that benefit Trump: 1) our economy is booming,  2) Trump had a successful summit with North Korea, and 3) the Inspector General report exposed James Comey’s FBI as a swamp of corruption out to exonerate Hillary Clinton and frame Trump.

  1. IMPORTANT: The ONLY Way to Unite Families Is to Release Them into America

Obviously, we cannot have children living in adult detention centers. Obviously, we cannot have adults living in child detention centers. Therefore, the only way to “reunite” these families is to release these illegals into our country.

The media will not tell you this because the media do not want you to know that flooding America with non-citizens is their true agenda. The rich and powerful love to exploit and abuse these individuals, as they can leverage their immigration status for illegally low wages, and politicians are salivating at the chance to bestow voting rights on them — and thus entrench their power.

But when you hear the media call for these families to be reunited, remember that is coded language that means only one thing: releasing illegal aliens into our country with nothing more than a court summons.

  1. Incentivizing the Act of Bringing Minor Children Across the Border Is Evil

The media do not want to inform Americans of one crucial fact: the dangers inherent in crossing the border from Mexico into America, most especially the dangers faced by minor children.  Sadly, these dangers too often involve sexual abuse.

Decent people who truly care about these children, like President Trump, want to do everything in their power to end this abuse — either by building a wall, or through this zero tolerance policy that will hopefully curb this abusive practice.

Evil people want these children dragged across the border, want this abuse incentivized by “keeping the family unit together,” because  flooding the country with future indebted voters is more important to them than the safety and well-being of small children.

  1. Those Who Come to America Legally Face ‘Family Separation’

Many people who come to America legally from other countries are separated from family. A big part of America’s LEGAL immigration policy involves family separation when one or two family members come over before the rest are legally or financially able.

And so, once again, we have the media and Democrats demanding special treatment for illegal immigrants that legal immigrants do not enjoy. Once again we are incentivizing lawbreaking and treating the line-jumpers better than those who follow the rules.

  1. Family Reunification” Is an Invitation to Human Traffickers

Because of “catch and release,” because of this dumb and destructive loophole carved out for families, the number of illegal aliens using children to enter the U.S. increased by 315 percent between October 2017 and February 2018.

Trump understands what is happening and this is why he has moved to a zero tolerance policy.

Anything other than zero tolerance only serves as an incentive for human traffickers and other criminals to use these children as their free pass into America.

Incentivizing such a thing is monstrous:

  1. Media Do Not Give a Shit About American Families Separated by Criminal Illegal Aliens

Illegal alien families are choosing to be separated by voluntarily engaging in lawbreaking. These illegal alien families, if they so choose, can stay together, simply by obeying the law.

This is not hard.

Those who do not have a choice in family separation are the legions of American families permanently separated from family members when that family member is killed at the hands of an illegal alien.

As Steve Bannon accurately pointed out over the weekend, “I don’t see the mainstream media and the liberal left embracing the Angel Moms, those people who were permanently separated from their children because of illegal aliens who came over here and committed crimes and killed people. You’re being very selective.”

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to People (including bishops) are being led around like a pig with a ring in his nose by the left/liberal Trump-hating media.

  1. johnkg73 says:

    Thank you, to a real Bishop!

  2. hellenback7 says:

    I want to be perfectly clear that I have nothing but respect for Bishop Gracida. I only recently discovered his site and signed up for notifications while I am closing nearly all other “social media” accounts due to the venomous nature of so much of the content.

    In regard to your polite rebuttal; I did not make my comment lightly and prefaced my one reservation with “I doubt”. I have been proved wrong by the fact that my post was approved.
    There are a couple of times when they haven’t been but as I am new here and am posting from an iPhone 5 it could easily have been me making a mistake as I learned to navigate the forum.

    With that out of the way (and said in all sincerity) I think the link you provided makes my point rather than contradicts it. It was not in existence when I posted so it seems President Trump agrees about the exceptional nature of this issue, unless anyone here wants to accuse him of being disingenuous rather than seeing his decision today as a merciful gesture towards children, while on the way to working out better legislation.
    I am in Canada and detest many of the policies of our Prime Minister. I applaud President Trump for getting on the right side of the abortion issue which I have always felt is of utmost importance. Even while I was living a pretty hedonistic lifestyle (>20 yrs ago) I could not bring myself to approve of abortion.
    With this acknowledged, it is difficult to see the president as any kind of paragon of virtue. Regardless, he should be commended for standing firm against the radical left in a manner I could only hope more Catholuc bishops and other clergy would do.

    I apologize again for any offense to the good bishop as it was not my intent. If I’m perfectly honest, in retrospect there was likely some desperation to be heard on this important issue involving innocent children. Perhaps semi-consciously I felt if I put forth my position in a somewhat challenging manner (after believing I had been previously censored) that the conversation would begin and we could honestly debate this difficult topic. It appears we are doing that and that there is in fact room for opinions that are not perfectly in line with the articles posted.
    I regret that my frustration with past comments not being approved coloured my reply when it is, as I said, quite possible that I did not post them properly.
    I want to thank the good bishop for providing this thoughtful and truly Catholic forum.

    (Any typos/misspelling are due to the near impossibility of properly proof reading on an iPhone 5 😉

  3. Sheepdog says:

    “I could go on but I doubt you are even open to true and honest conversation, even with a Catholic who follows Church precepts”. End Quote. With all due respect not sure that is true about Bishop Gracida. Also he is 95 years old. He’s earned the right to do whatever he wants on this blog. He’s not threatening anyone nor is he breaking Church or Civil Law. I think people just need to read him the right way. He’s also not like the cult like groups that define parts of the SSPX and Sedevanctist heretics.

    Finally watch this:

  4. gellerman55 says:

    Sorry, I usually agree with you but I’m with hellenback7 on this. I don’t care who did this before, I don’t care about any of the particulars, I don’t care who is declaring moral supremacy…I don’t care. You rip a screaming toddler from the arms of its mother, father, uncle, or a paid coyote and you are WORSE than they are. It is evil, it is wrong, and it should not be happening, period.

  5. Terri Bradley says:

    Thanks for posting the facts your Excellency. The US Bishops cannot be ignorant of these facts, if they have 2 brain cells to rub together, they know the score. They are just another arm of the Democrat Party and the Deep State to their spiritual demise, and if they weren’t misleading others into the abyss they should be more pitied than censored.

  6. hellenback7 says:

    I usually agree with you but this is a special circumstance unlike most illegal actions by citizens. There is no reason that a screaming, sobbing two year old would act that way if the person they were being separated from was not their mother (or acting in that capacity). There is also no reason that “women and children” could not be afforded some preferential treatment in another facility created for that purpose. Throughput most of history it seems that women and mothers with their children are treated with preferential respect. It is a virtue that has been practiced by decent people throughout the ages…not only by Christians.
    I could go on but I doubt you are even open to true and honest conversation, even with a Catholic who follows Church precepts. Anytime I disagree by even a hair my replies are not posted.

Comments are closed.