Thursday, June 06, 2019
5 Dubia Questions for 1P5’s Steve Skojec
Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren’t too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer.
To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no.
1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said ” The Pope… when he is explicitly a heretic… the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See.” Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no.
2. “Universal Acceptance” theologian John of St. Thomas said “This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff.” Was John of St. Thomas for saying “the supreme pontiff” must be BOTH “lawfully elected and accepted by the Church” a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no.
3. Do you think that a “supreme pontiff” if “universally accepted” is still Pope if, to quote papal validity expert Arnaldo Xavier de Silveira on “dubious election[s]”, that he is “a woman… a child… a demented person… a heretic… a apostate… [which] would [thus] be invalid[ed] by divine law”? Answer: yes or no.
4. Renowned Catholic historian Warren Carroll agreed with Bishop René Gracida on the determining factor for discerning a valid conclave for a valid papal election besides divine law. Carroll pronounced:
“But each Pope, having unlimited sovereign power as head of the Church, can prescribe any method for the election of his successor(s) that he chooses… A papal claimant not following these methods is also an Antipope.”
Are renowned historian Carroll and Bishop Gracida for saying this Sedevacantists or Benevacantists? Answer: yes or no.
5. Is Bishop Gracida really only a pawn of the legendary and notorious “Sedevacantist and Benevacantist” mastermind Ann Barnhardt for convincingly demonstrating that there is valid evidence that Pope John Paul II’s conclave constitution “Universi Dominici Gregis” which “prescribe[d].. [the] method for the election of his successor(s)” was violated and must be investigated by Cardinals? Answer: yes or no.
Please feel free to answer these dubia questions in any manner you decide, Mr. Skojec, except for the following ways:
1. Do not answer the dubia questions by posting a comment in the Catholic Monitor comment section because you are banned until you allow a free forum for debate on these dubia questions on the One Peter Five comment section.
If you attempt to post on the Catholic Monitor comment section before you allow a free forum at your website your post will be deleted.
2. Do not answer the dubia questions by emailing the publisher of the Catholic Monitor until you allow a free forum for debate on these dubia questions on the One Peter Five comment section.
If you attempt to email me before allowing a free forum at your website your email will be deleted and unread.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
ABYSSUS ABYSSUM INVOCAT / DEEP CALLS TO DEEP 
Steve has made it very clear that his position is political not rational nor principled. Arguing with him will only be an occasion for further insults. He is confusing human faith in the Cardinals with divine faith in Christ inasmuch as it extends to Canon Law as an act promulgated by Christ’s Vicar, which thus is superior in authority to all human faith, even that to all the cardinals and bishops in the Church on the question of a point of fact.
Steve Skoject and One Peter five are correct about some things. However, Steve is in error in regards to Bishop Gracida and the papacy. Bishop Gracida has already proven his position. Steve has yet to offer a solid counterargument.
Where does your Excellency stand re- the Cardinal Siri (“Pope Gregory XVII”) theory (or theories, since some say he had a successor) and/or the invalidity of John XXIII’s election, as eclipse1958.com and some other sites cover?
Skojerk should be put on permanent waivers.
Sent from my iPhone
>
Goodness. Skojec has asked for a clearer target and now he has one. Kudos to Martinez for his clarity! Any return to Scholastic standards is most welcome.