THE SITUATION OF THE CHURCH IS MUCH WORSE (IF THAT CAN BE IMAGINED) NOW THAN IT WAS IN THE FOURTH CENTURY DURING THE CRISIS OVER THE Arian heresy

Catholic Monitor

Saturday, May 02, 2020

Are Bp. Gracida & Bp. Lenga the New St. Athanisuis Bishops?

Archbishop Jan Lenga was formerly the “Apostlic Administrator” of not only Kazakhstan, but of the tiny country of Turkmenistan.
(Fatima, Russia and Pope John Paul II: How Mary Intervened to Deliver Russia,” Page 202)

Interestingly, the Catholic Monitor which has given some coverage to Archbishop Lenga’s position that Francis is an antipope has begun noticing that the people of Turkmenistan are starting to read the online Monitor.

Might Lenga’s former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to declare Francis an antipope in an imperfect council as St. Bernard of Clairvaux’s imperfect council in France was the first to declared the supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an antipope?

Is Lenga in schism as some may be stating for claiming Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation was invalid thus Francis is an antipope?

It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard claimed the supposed pope in Rome was an antipope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct by an imperfect council which he headed.

Author Msgr. Leon Cristiani wrote:

“King Louis convoked a Council at Etampes, to consider the question of the double pontifical election… Bernard was received at Etampes as God’s envoy.”
(St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Pages 70-71)

Was St. Bernard in schism?

The Arian heretics were saying the same thing about St. Athanasius. That he was in schism.

The saint was resisting the Arian heretic bishops even apparently outside the valid pope’s approval.

It appears that Archbishop Lenga may force the cardinals and bishops to do an investigation and call an imperfect council into the validity of the Francis’s papacy because a bishop cannot suspend a bishop. Only a pope can suspend a bishop.

But, Lenga states Benedict is still pope because of a invalid resignation and therefore Francis isn’t pope according to the archbishop.

Cardinal John Henry Newman it appears showed that a validly appointed bishop can’t suspend another validly appointed bishop.

Newman said Athanasius ordained priests against the authority of the Arian heretical bishops who were validly appointed bishops.

In fact, scholar Joseph Bingham on page 98 in “The Antiquities of the Christian Church” said:

“Athanasius… made no scruples to ordain… [Bishop] Euesebius of Samosata… ordained bishops also in Syria and Cilicia.”

Moreover, Newman in his “The Development of Christian Doctrine” denied that Bishop Athanasius’s “interference” in the dioceses of the heretical Arian bishops was schism:

“If interference is a sin, division which is the cause of it is a greater; but where division is a duty, there can be no sin interference.”
(Gutenberg.org, “An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine,” Sixth Edition)

Was Doctor of the Church St. Athanasius a schismatic?

Moreover, serious scholars are claiming Francis is a material heretic. The 19 Scholar’s Open Letter say that Francis is a material heretic which also brings into play the Bellarmine and Francis de Sales option of declaring an explicit heretical pope self-deposed.

Bishop Gracida’s Open Letter to the Cardinals analysing and quoting Pope John Paul II’s Universi Dominici gregis questions the validity of the Francis conclave calling for an cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave.

Latin language expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo’s in-depth thesis “Munus and Ministerium: A Textual Study of their Usage in the Code of Canon Law of 1983” using exhaustive quotations from canon law showing why canon law explicitly states that ministerium and munus cannot be synonyms that mean the exact same thing or nearly the same thing thus denying the validity of Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.Posted by Fred Martinez at 1:15 PM Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to THE SITUATION OF THE CHURCH IS MUCH WORSE (IF THAT CAN BE IMAGINED) NOW THAN IT WAS IN THE FOURTH CENTURY DURING THE CRISIS OVER THE Arian heresy

  1. peritus52gmailcom says:

    Salutem in Domino, mi care pastor bonum!

    This is precisely the post that I have been waiting for! I wanted to know more about Archbishop Lenga and now I do, thanks to Your Excellency and your wonderful blog.

    I admire and am so appreciative of your and his courage and fidelity to your episcopal oaths in proclaiming Cardinal Bergolio for what he is, an antipope, an illegally elected Pope by cardinal electors who were automatically excommunicated by their actions in plotting his “election.”

    Very pleased to learn of the connection between Archbishop Lenga and Bishop Athansius Schneider.

    Deus te benedicat. Cura ut valeas.

    In Christo Rege nostro,

    John

    On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 5:56 PM ABYSSUS ABYSSUM INVOCAT / DEEP CALLS TO DEEP wrote:

    > abyssum posted: ” Catholic Monitor Saturday, May 02, 2020 Are Bp. Gracida > & Bp. Lenga the New St. Athanisuis Bishops? Archbishop Jan Lenga was > formerly the “Apostlic Administrator” of not only Kazakhstan, but of the > tiny country of Turkmenistan.(Fatima, Russi” > Respond to this post by replying above this line > New post on *ABYSSUS ABYSSUM INVOCAT / DEEP CALLS TO DEEP* > THE SITUATION OF THE CHURCH IS MUCH > WORSE (IF THAT CAN BE IMAGINED) NOW THAN IT WAS IN THE FOURTH CENTURY > DURING THE CRISIS OVER THE Arian heresy > by > abyssum > Catholic Monitor Saturday, May 02, > 2020 Are Bp. Gracida & Bp. Lenga the New St. Athanisuis Bishops? > > Archbishop Jan Lenga was formerly the “Apostlic Administrator” of not only > Kazakhstan, but of the tiny country of Turkmenistan. > (Fatima, Russia and Pope John Paul II: How Mary Intervened to Deliver > Russia,” Page 202) > > Interestingly, the Catholic Monitor which has given some coverage to > Archbishop Lenga’s position that Francis is an antipope has begun noticing > that the people of Turkmenistan are starting to read the online Monitor. > > Might Lenga’s former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to > declare Francis an antipope in an imperfect council as St. Bernard of > Clairvaux’s imperfect council in France was the first to declared the > supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an antipope? > > Is Lenga in schism as some may be stating for claiming Pope Benedict XVI’s > resignation was invalid thus Francis is an antipope? > > It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard claimed the supposed > pope in Rome was an antipope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct by > an imperfect council which he headed. > > Author Msgr. Le

  2. Ana Milan says:

    If the promised imperfect council by the Dubia Cardinals had gone ahead we would have had a resolution to this problem – either that PBXVI would have resumed the PO in its entirety or resigned properly according to Canon Law & left the confines of the Vatican. It would then have been correct to call a conclave in keeping with the rules laid down by PJPII with no electioneering or meddling with votes. As it was, PBXVI through a clever ‘misuse’ of Latin in which he wrote his resignation only stipulated the ministerium & not the munus, thereby keeping the papal titles & regalia he still uses. However, in his eagerness to be named the best chess player ever, he has debased the Papacy by bifurcating it & leaving us for the past seven years with an Antipope who has openly denied the Deity of Christ, signed the Abu Dhabi declaration which cited that God wills diversity of religions, engaged in the wicked treachery of handing over seven million Chinese Catholics to a Communist Regime & publicly blessed & honoured pagan idols in the Vatican among many other heresies, scandals, blasphemies & finally closing our Churches prohibiting Mass attendance & the reception of the Sacraments. He also introduced the title Pope Emeritus which never applied before as only Bishops used this title when they resigned from Office.

    It surely is the End Times & maybe even the end of the Papacy itself . There is absolutely no reason for NOT calling an imperfect council immediately to resolve this extraordinarily evil mess we have endured before the death of our living Pope, an exile in the Vatican, comes to pass.

Comments are closed.