CERCA NEL SITOhttps://enricomariaradaelli.it/emr/aureadomus/barra_libri.htmlHOMEPAGE > CONVIVIUM INDICE Enrico Maria Radaelli * AT THE HEART OF RATZINGER.  HE IS THE POPE, NOT THE OTHER.The non-Renunciation of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013 it is the direct fruit of “Ratzingerism”, the taught heresy for fifty years by Pope Joseph Ratzinger in his Introduction to Christianity. Pro manuscripto illustrated, editions Aurea Domus, in-8°, Preface by H.E.R. Mgr. René Henry Gracida.  Milan 2022, pp. 469, € 60,00, at 15% discount, = € 45,00, equivalent to dollar § 50;  (You can request it with an E-MAIL to the Author, payment with Paypal) * * * ONE BOOK ALONE AGAINST  EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE,  OR ONE BOOK TO SAVE  EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE ?* * * FRONT* * *BACK* * *First: a book against Pope Ratzinger or a book to save Pope Ratzinger?  Breaking the veil with which even the most apparently faithful Pastors of the Church have blinded their eyes for nine years in order to hide the truth, the book I am proposing shows, for the first time in the world, all the very gravely erroneous and articulated doctrine Hegelian taught since 1967 at the University of Tübingen by Prof. Ratzinger, who, climbing the most important steps of the Magisterium to the highest, is revered by all as the most formidable champion of the faith.  Now, given that de internis non iudicat prætor, objective, public facts are found in the book, given which, see pp. 357-8, with great apprehension Pope Benedict is shown the only way to save himself from the grave danger that would await him if he does not disavow his terrible doctrines.* * *Second: a book against the “Ratzingerians” or to save the “Ratzingerians”? On this basis, for the first time in the world it is shown with the most irrefutable and rigorous evidence that the Renunciation made on 11 February 2013 by Benedict XVI is invalid and null and void, and only because it was elaborated on the basis of the erroneous Hegelian doctrine of which above, which all the Cardinals and Bishops of the Church have supinely accepted, except two, one of whom also wanted to draft the important Preface now placed at the end of the book. However, if these Pastors recognize that the Renunciation is invalid, as demonstrated on pp. LXXVI ff. and on pp. 366-8, the writer here is the first to point out that they too would save themselves from the terrible punishment that awaits those who adhere to erroneous doctrines, always in compliance with the above judicial principle.* * *Third: a book against “Francis” or a book to save “Francis”? From what has been said it follows that “Francis” is in reality an anti-pope, so that what has just been said also applies to him: if he too recognizes that the Conclave which (knowing he is electing an anti-pope: the facts are objective) elected him on the 13th March 2013 is invalid and null, he too will return to obey the Laws of God, as indicated throughout the book, especially on pp. 375-7, thus perhaps saving himself as his modernist accomplices from the punishment reserved for those who betray the Law of God. * * * TO SHAKE THE CHURCH FROM THE MODERNIST SPELL         OF RATZINGERISM TAKES A DIVINE INTERVENTION.   This book should have been little more than a pedantic and perhaps boring doctrinal critical investigation, and instead it immediately revealed much more than that, because somehow a kind of drama soon took to life in it, almost a Greek tragedy in which all the important doctrinal concepts have as though withdrawn into the background, as if they were just a large scenario, the severe landscape more and more tormented and anguished, in which events take place that have taken more and more life, breaking up in a jolt in a conclusion from page to page more and more pressing, unexpected, and, as will be seen, overwhelming.    And this is the point: that this metaphysical essay, wearing the increasingly evident and dramatic garments of a Greek tragedy, turns out to be even more than an invented work, which is precisely a Greek tragedy, showing itself as the crudest and ruthless photograph of a precise fact: that of the Church and the world caught today in their most hasty flight from reality. That is, better: in their most hasty flight from God: from the reality of God. And it is precisely from this detailed and documented discovery that the drama was born: from the merciless photograph of a precise, very current and global event; but, even before that, it is precisely from here that the rigorous, documented and scientific philosophical analysis of those Ratzingerian doctrines from which that drama came to life was born.    And this is where the book “exploded”. Yes: it really “exploded” into unexpected and very lively images of Angels, Archangels, Cherubs and Serafini, because its almost five hundred pages were suddenly animated by unexpected Celestial Creatures, don’t ask me how, don’t ask why, as if the thousand terrible doctrinal truths unfolded had felt the most imperative need to make everyone see clearly, from the first to the last page, the faces, eyes, mouths and lips of those who were really uttering those terrible and powerful words of indisputable truth, so that, among a hundred clouds torn here and there by darting rays of the sun or by flashes of lightning and lightning, they came to life, among those writings of high metaphysics about a more than justly much loved and universally well appreciated personality, and we are obviously talking about Pope Joseph Ratzinger, dozens of ineffable creatures who somehow made their way between the lines, the drop caps, the references, the headlines, shaking them and violating them. and with no respect for the structural order, now with the most moving, weeping and painful sweetness, now with the most unusual roughness and arrogance, in any case always without having asked anyone’s permission, certainly not me. Result? I wish the readers were to judge him. We could perhaps imagine this strange book with a somewhat four-faced look as if it were not at all shy, but determined, unstoppable and comely last Muse, also released, like all her other sweet sisters, due to the urgency of the Truth to show us that it can reach our hearts not only through the irresistible force of the most reasoned and solid logic, but because it is precisely this Truth, in itself Truth, that is attractive, that is splendid, that is beautiful, that is, that is boundlessly desirable, to be married immediately and forever.Why marry? Because the Truth that lives in Beauty is our Lord Jesus Christ himself, Verbum et Imago Dei, and he is our Spouse, it is He who awaits us from heaven, to make us live forever. Forever, do you understand? Together with him, in the Father’s arms of love. What are we waiting to be convinced?  * * *Here, in a nutshell, are the eighteen serious heretical deviations that I was able to detect in my study, published for four years under the title At the heart of Ratzinger. At the heart of the world, and which I believe to have been taught for fifty years by Professor Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, in his Introduction to Christianity, fifteen of which were struck by the Church – and once even three times –, in its long history, by due anàtemized, and which together gives rise to pluriery, never disavowed by its Author, indeed at least three times clearly reaffirmed, which gives rise to “RATZINGERISM”:1), the most springing and initial deviation: adoption of the Kierkegaard-Pascalian fideistic model, for which the metaphysical knowledge of God is impossible (see, in At the heart of Ratzinger, §§ 11-21); 2), the most incisive: subversion of the order of the Persons of the divine Monotriad, that is, not perceived but implemented and systematic inversion of the metaphysical order that will and intellect must have (the will, which proceeds, is made to precede the intellect), thus making the SS. Trinity an arbitrary and dictatorial God as in the erroneous Islamic notion, so as to lose his two most substantial qualities: the reason and the love (throughout the book, especially in §§ 65-6 and 70); anathematized; 3), the most devastating: consequent recourse to the postulates of practical reason: replacement of reasons for believing with the will to believe. Thus theory is replaced with praxis, which however, as we know, is not suitable for reasoning, but rather constitutes its stumbling block that devastates and annihilates it, that is, it is its error (see §§ 11-21) ; anathematized; 4), the most modernist: adoption of the skeptical Fideistic doubt based on knowledge, assuming as a criterion precisely what constitutes the surest vehicle of cognitive uncertainty, placing it in the first place at the basis of the knowledge taught by the Church: supernatural knowledge, or witness, or by faith (§ § 11-6);anathematized;5), the most tragedy: the conviction that God remains “essentially invisible”, even in the beatific vision of Paradise (§ 18); 6),the most antiscientific: the evident if not explicit disavowal of the divine origin of the Bible, for which it would be man who conjectures things about God, and not God who with His Word teaches man what man must know about He and must then do (§§ 64 and 69); anathematized;  7),the most atheist: to reduce the notions and prophecies of the Holy Scriptures concerning invisible realities such as Hell and devil or miraculous such as the divine and virginal sonship of Jesus Christ to imaginative and semi-pagan mythologisms (in several points, especially in §§ 64-5); anathematized; 8),the most idealistically cause initial: the evident but not explicit disregard of the reality principle, which moreover can only be found in the principle of source “innascence”, or “of in-birth” of God the Father, and, metaphysically speaking, nowhere else (§§ 10 and 25);  9), the most idealistically consequent: splitting of the Papacy into “Active Papacy” and “Passive Papacy” within a “Synodal Papacy”, in the typical, unreasonable, unrealistic and anti-Catholic idealistic Heg-elian scheme of “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” (§ 22);anathematized; 10), the most Pantheistic-Spinosian: to make thinking coincide in God with creating, with the consequent conviction that therefore the essence of God would be involved in His creation and in human history (§§ 19, 42 and 63; anathematized; 11), the most absurd (but ideologically necessary for the Ratzingerism): connote God as “God of Freedom”, charging Him with two aspects then transmitted, by analogy, to the world created by Him: elusiveness and unpredictability, as in the false notion of God elaborated later by Mohammed, and, nine hundred years later, by Luther, by Calvin and the “enlightenment” atheists of all centuries, including those of today (§§ 24-26); anathematized; 12), the most unlikely antitrinitarian: to introduce in the essence of God, in addition to the concept of Logos, that of Diá-logos, or “Colloquium”, for which the three Persons “dialogue” with each other as with man; the antipope will take the matter to the extreme, arguing that « the three Persons quarrel », because the dialogue of a “God of Freedom” cannot have boundaries (§§ 55-60 and 66); but the essence of God has no motion: in it there is only one, unique, all-en-compassing and eternal “SuperThought”: the Logos; anathematized; 13), THE MOST SERIOUS: rejection and annihilation of the divine, ineffable Redemption as the ‘Holocaust Sacrifice of God the Son, in Jesus Christ, to God the Father’, confirmed in 2016 – in an interview with Jacques Servais s.j. – as a fact « unacceptable by modern man », that is, in reality, by Pope Ratzinger himself (§§ 39-43 and 62-5); anathematized; 14), the most reductive: the belief that Redemption is “the attainment, in Christ ‘Omega’, of the perfect man” with a Teilhardian imprint (§§ 44-7); anathematized; 15), the most devastating: cancellation of original sin, of the concept of sin as an “offense to God”, of Hell, of the devil, of Purgatory, of Heaven, as well as of the final and definitive separation of the “pious people” from the “impious”, because it too is « unacceptable by modern man », that is, always by Ratzinger, also here hidden behind the periphrasis « modern man » (§§ 50-3); anathematized;       16), the most illogical and depressing: cancellation of the glorious bodies of the blessed in Paradise, including those of Christ and the Virgin (§§ 50-1);     17), the most repulsive: the conviction that « the doctrine of the divinity of Jesus would not be affected if Jesus were born of a human marriage », with all the multiple, serious and heretical consequences that this entails (§ 71); anathematized; and three times; 18), the most ecumenist: the opinion that the Church’s unconsutable tunic, due to the splits caused by the disobedience and rebellions of the heretics, is today « divided into multiple churches » (§ 72); anathematized. * * *CONTENTS. (Come back up)     Foreword of René Henry Gracida………………………………….p. I  First Part. PREQUEL: ON THE RENUNCIATION OF POPE BENEDICT XVI.    1. The reason why we call these pages “Prequel”.………..p. V    2. Today, Romano Amerio would affirm:        “Benedict XVI’s Resignation is invalid,         null and void. Ratzinger is still the Pope.         Bergoglio is an antipope.”        The reason is the following………………………………………p. VII     3.How did we arrive to the present disgraceful situation…..p. X     4. What is the good that the Church must always pursue…..p. XII     5. The terms of the problem…………………………………………..p. XV    6. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus        Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ according to       the meaning attributed to them from Magisterium       of the Church………………………………………………………..p. XVII         7. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus        Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ according to       the meaning attributed to them since fifty years        from Pope Benedict XVI’s – Joseph Ratzinger’s       in his ancient and never retracted Hegelian ideology…..p. XXII                                            8. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus        Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ in the meaning       attributed to them from Pope Benedict XVI’s in his       Declaratio of Resignation of February 11, 2013………..p. XXIV       9. Logical-semantic analysis of the Farewell Speech       held by Benedict XVI of February 27, 2013…………….p. XXVII  10. The notions of ‘Bishop emeritus’ end of ‘Pope       emeritus’ according to the Magisterium of the        Church. Do we have here a legislative vacuum       or only the will to do whatever one wants?……………p. XXX  11. First conclusions of the logic-semantic analysis        on Benedict XVI’s Declaratio and Farewell Speech…p. XXXV  12. The arguments of invalidity of Pope        Benedict XVI’s Resignation of the Papacy         with regard to a juridical-canonical validation.        First aspect: is the Resignation invalided       by external elements?………………………………………p. XXXVII  13.The arguments of invalidity of Pope        Benedict XVI’s Resignation of the Papacy        with regard to a juridical-canonical validation.        Second aspect: is the Resignation invalided       by internal elements?..……………………………………..p. XL       14. CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………..p. XLIV  15. Finally, there is a reasoning that doesn’t give alternatives: neither to the Pope, nor to anyone        else: the Pope is and remains Benedict XVI.       The reasoning that we say is called        “Disjunctive vel”. There it is.………………………………p. XLVII 15.A. First reflection, based on the premise ‘p’,   which says: You are Pope, yes, albeit ‘emeritus’.…p. LI  15.B. Second reflection, based on the premise ‘q’,         as opposed to ‘p’: No, You are not Pope,  because You has renounced it.…………………………….p. LIV  Post Scriptum. Where and how this work is inserted in the vast       panorama of the very significant studies      existing on the topic today on the subject……………..p. LVII Annotation in the margin of the II par of p. XXVII (*),   of the II par of p. XLIII (**)  end IV par of p. XLV (***)…………………………………..p. LXVIII            The Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicates         Pope Ratzinger (and with him the whole Church).       And You, Pope Ratzinger, what are You waiting       for to save Yourself from excommunication       (and save, with You, the whole Church)?…………….p. LXVIII      Is perhaps a universal self-excommunication        of the Church possible? Yes, it is possible:        isn’t that just what is happening today?……………..p. LXXVII Second Part. ON THE TEACHING OF JOSEPH RATZINGER  IN HIS STUDY INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIANITY.       Anthology of the eighteen (18!) most serious        heresies found in Introduction to Christianity,        never retracted, indeed three times, even recently,        by their Author confirmed, fifteen of which (five out        of six) already struck by precise anàthemas.…………….p. 373     1. Equalities and inequalities…………………………………………..p. 17    2. Who is the true “Master of doubt”         of the super-doubtful Cardinal Archbishop        Monsignor Carlo Maria Martini ………………………………….p. 19    3. First: what is the task of a catholic theologian       regarding the “Norma normans” of the Faith?       Second: is this task also performed        by Prof. Ratzinger?…………………………………………………..p. 22    4. The non-catholic heaven of the Professor from        Tübinghen’s book, Introduction to Christianity       – which by an ideological choice is a historicist,        anti-metaphysical and fideistic book – anticipates       the sky without dogma of today’s antipope “Francis”……..p. 26    5. Why an old book of fifty years ago is as important        is as few other books in the word……………………………….p. 31    6. How to empty the doctrine of Faith from inside.        Or from where, how, and through whom the current         devastating secularization of the West has been spread……p. 36        7. Metaphysical methodology and historical methodology:       that is catholic and anti-catholic, that is, modernist.       Which one will Prof. Mons. Ratzinger have chosen?………p. 42                                            8. The historicist, anti-metaphysical, anti-scientific,        and anti-catholic methodology of the Theologian       from Tübingen.…………………………………………………………p. 47       9. If the exclusion of the correct investigation tools,         which are moreover a duty and mandatory,         can constitute a method……………………………………………….p. 51  10. The historicist method is the theologian’s drug.        And the Protestant and Lutheran leaders are its pushers…..p. 54  11. One by one, the Professor’s main statements       of Tübingen on the problems of doubt of Faith.………….p. 59 12. The doubt. The only thing of which,        for Professor Ratzinger, one must never doubt……………….p. 62 13. You will never insist enough on certainty that God       wants to instill in us: to be knowable by us. More:       that His knowledge is by God strongly wanted……………….p. 67  14. Perfect theoreticality of the reasoning of Faith.        Total unreasonableness of any doubt about Faith…………….p. 70      15. The crossroads of Ratzingerian thought is not       Faith, but doubt. And precisely the skeptical doubt.…..p. 72 16. The Ratzingerian skeptical doubt, father of the new era of Faith: the ‘Mobilist’ Faith………….p. 74 17. What ever might conclude of good, a reason that       made it self unable to be, as it should, very certain       of the truth it knows, one reason, that is, which,         by it self, has made it self powerless and incapable        of reasoning correctly?……………………………………………….p. 78  18.Professor Ratzinger has every reason to have such        a dramatically skeptical Faith: how does a man have       a luminous Faith in a God which for him will always        be « the essentially Invisible »?…………………………………….p. 81  19. Here we are, at last it comes to light a doctrine        that dangerously approaches Professor Ratzinger       to nothing less than Baruc Spinoza. And not only………p. 87  20. Kantius genuit Kierkegaardium, Kierkegardius genuit autem Coxium, Coxius inde genuit Ratzingerium,       Ratzingerius vero genuit Martinum, Martinus denique……p. 92     21. The fideistic skepticism of the Tübingen         Professor is it perhaps subject to some         ecclesiastical censorship?…………………………………………..p. 94  22. The heretical Ratzingerian concept of the active Papacy       and the passive Papacy as a direct reflection of the        scheme idealistic Hegelian-like of  “believer and        non-believer”……………………………………………………………..p. 97   23. God said: « Look for Me in a horrid region »,        or not rather: « Do not look for Me        in a horrid region »? (Isaiah 45:19; tr. CEI 74.)……………p. 103  24. To much “relationship”, in the Professor’s theology,       and no “substance”: “But it’s the anti-metaphysics,       my dear. It is from here that the Church       has lost the principle of reality.”………………………………….p. 104  25. The most appropriate definition of the “religious   philosophy”, as Livi would call it, of the Professor  Joseph Ratzinger, is: “Ultra-Idealist Philosophy”:        “Beyond Idealism”.…………………………………………………p. 111  26. If the “God Freedom” conjectured in 1967 in       Tübingen resembles the notion of God elaborated  in 610 by Mohammed and that reworked   in the Sixteenth century by Luther and Calvin.………..p. 114  27. What binds and what unties the uncertainties  of skeptical doubt to the certainties         of the “Common sense” of Mgr. Livi and of Faith…….p. 118  28. For Professor Ratzinger and Cardinal Martini       perhaps that Faith is a perpetual wave-like motion?………p. 122  29. The one professed by Professor Ratzinger and by       Cardinal Martini is a heretic ‘voluntary doubt’, or is it       merely ‘an excessive preoccupation with believing’?…….p. 129  30. From the skeptical doubt of the Professor of Tübingen        to « synodal polyhedral » of the antipope “Francis”:        total abolition of all truthful certainty, to begin with from       that of the five certainties of the “Common sense”………..p. 133       31. If it can be said that a Christian “does not have”       the truth, who does not posses the truth,         as the antipope “Francis” says.………………………………..p. 136  32. Can’t Popes be judged and censored? In that case are        to be judged and censored a Professor and a Cardinal……p. 141  33. If the heretical palindrome conjectured in 1967 by the       Professor of Tübingen, confirmed and perfected in 1988       by a ultra-Cardinal of Milan, finally summarized in 2015       even by an antipope, it annihilates the whole Church…….p. 144  34.Thanks to the “Farmer”, we understand the “Prof”;        worse: thanks to an antipope we understand the Pope.       More: thanks to an antipope idolatrous        we understand a Pope heretical. That is, how much        ultra-extremist it is was believed moderate.……………..p. 147  35. Who is it, for the Tübingen Professor and for the man       of today, the protagonist on the world scene:        is it perhaps God, which, however, don’t be seen,        or is it the man, who instead be seen?………………………….p. 151  36. The real drama – tó dràma – is between Heaven       and earth, between God and man.        But Prof. Ratzinger does not notice it at all………………….p. 156  37. Since God, provided He exists, provided He speaks,       He didn’t speak first, who ever did then?…………………….p. 160  38. And forgiveness too, who brought it into the world?       God brought it or men brought it?………………………………p. 164  39. We enter the drama of the Heavens.          And of the Heavens of Heavens: the drama        of an indignant God the Father, and of His Son          – He too God –, to Him in His own sacrificed blood.       We enter there whereit really does not want       to enter, and never is entered, the historicist        Professor from Tübingen.………………………………………..p. 168 40. For the Church it is the central “liturgical dogma”.       For Professor Ratzinger (and future Pope)        it is « a cruel one and unacceptable mechanism ».        Who is right?…………………………………………………………..p. 171  41. I ask: the millions of Masses celebrated        according to the Novus Ordo Missæ        of Pope Paul VI, are under anàthema?…………………….p. 174  42. In full Soteriology, appears again Spinoza………………….. p. 180  43. “Lamb of God”: yea, to appease the indignation of God,       the Lamb can only be of God.        But in what sense “of God”?………………………………………p. 18344. Prolegomena to an evolutionary theology:        “Cosmic Doubt” plus “Cosmic Evolutionism”,        equal to…?…………………………………………………………….p. 188  45. Where, how and when was born the transformation         of the rocky society founded on Jesus Christ into the       liquid society dissolved in the putrescent liberal acid…….p. 194  46. The fluid and putrescent society of today is all born        from a fluid and putrescent Church, which is to say         from a Church false-pastoral, i.e. hypo-dogmatic,         born from a fluid and putrescent Council, i.e. from         a false-pastoral Council, that is hypo-dogmatic:       the very modernist Ecumenical Council Vatican II…..p. 198 47. Professor Ratzinger, in short: Evolution        or Redemption? “Mais naturellement, oui:  ‘Èvoludemption’! In English ‘Evoludemption’!That’s what they say, right?”…………………………………..p. 202                                           48. The fanciful and palpable contradictions        of an antipope, and the false and non-existent       contradictions of the Truth…………………………………………p. 207                                           49. How Ratzingerian Ultra-Idealism – surpassing himself,        as indeed was predictable –  it has become        “the Ratzinger-Teilhardian Theological System”……………p. 208                                           50. To Catholic dogma absolutely not enough that        Paradise is located « in the memory of God ».        To Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, on the contrary, instead yes. Who is right?………………………………………..p. 212  51. The « resuscitation of the bodies » according to the two       New Cathars: Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin s. j. and       the Monsignor Joseph Aloisius Professor Ratzinger………p. 216  52. No devils, for Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, nor damned.    The Hell, in fact, is not only empty, but, for him,     it isn’t even there………………………………………………………p. 228  53. So no devils, damned and Hell, for the Prof. Ratzinger,        but not even Limbo, Purgatory and Paradise. Thus       is solved at the root “the Great Problem of Evil”.……..p. 230 54. Add “Christ Omega” to “Christ Community”. This,       with the drafting of Introduction to Christianity, is the       large strategy of Professor Joseph Mgr. Ratzinger.…..p. 23955. Says “Tübingen”: « In the one and indivisible God exists       the phenomenon of dialogue ». But motion, in God, doesn’t exist. So, how can there be ‘dialogue’,  which certainly is a motion?……………………………………….p. 244                                           56.  The Professor Ratzinger is the real great theorist of the        II Vatican Council: it is he who has been able to find in the         SS. Trinity the cornerstone of the praxis there born and        brought to full maturity by the antipope Bergoglio……….p. 24857.  Trinitarian continuity and discontinuity, that are  substantial, decisive, between the Prof. of Tübingen        and the antipope today increasingly indecently        reigning.…………………………………………………………………p. 25458. The Professor of Tübingen does not even imagine       what hides the Trinitarian « diá-lógos » invented       by him.. But the non-Pope “fake simpleton”        understood this immediately.…………………………………..p. 258                                                                        59. The small Greek particle ‘diá’ is the Ratzingerian least       iota that, exploding in three powerful errors, it subverts       the essence of God and the whole earth, as it can only        the most furious spiritual cataclysm in the world…………..p. 261 60. Says the Professor from Tübingen: « The three         Persons of the SS. Trinity dialogue ». « No – says        the antipope “Francis” firmly –, the three Persons        quarrel, but they do not show it ».………………………………p. 26361. “To dialogue! To dialogue!” They shouted joyfully          the Fathers of the II Vatican Council leaving St. Peter’s        “(Thus the world will no longer grimly at us)”……………..p. 267            62. There is a problem: that “the Great Problem of Evil”       is exalted by the Redemption of Christ,        which frees man from things as sin, death and Hell,        which however are no there left. So what do we do?        Simple: you change Redemption.……………………………..p. 270  63. Analysis of what is called “medium term”, that is,        of the topics chosen by the Professor of Tübingen       to “forget” the work of Redemption of Jesus Christ………p. 274  64. But the narrator of the Holy Scriptures is it God       or is the Professor of  Tübingen?…………………………………p. 279  65. Analysis of the final conclusions reached by the Professor       Ratzinger for remove, indeed for cancel, without        being seen by none, the Redemption of Jesus Christ……..p. 288  66. ‘Diá’ and ‘relation’. Two of the many small iota        not to be included in any way in the Catholic doctrine        on the SS. Trinity.         But inserted secretly by a Professor of Tübingen……..p. 296                       67. The basic Christological error of the Theologian        of Tübingen it is to place the starting point        of the Catholic Faith in the Cross, and not, as it is,        in the glory of the Resurrection…………………………………..p. 300 68. The premise necessary and sufficient to solve all the problems       that arise from the “Great Problem of Evil”………………….p. 304  69. Here are all the problems of the “Great Problem of Evil”.       But also their holy, unique and Christ-like solution…..p. 309  70. How can serious explanatory work be transformed       of the doctrine in a dangerous ideology,        that is, in horrid idol………………………………………………….p. 321  71. Let us now speak of the Blessed Virgin.       “But why – asks Professor Ratzinger –,        must She be a virgin? There was no need”.……………….p. 326 72. Professor Ratzinger, tell us: the Church of Christ        is or is not only and uniquely the Roman Catholic        Apostolic Church?……………………………………………………p. 34273. Without Livi’s notion of  “Common sense”, there is        a big risk: even that the idol ‘community’ be born – as         Professor Ratzinger does – from the Holy Scriptures……p. 348 74. Sacrificed to the Ratzingerian idol ‘Community’       also the lively and most loving hermit spirituality…………p. 354  75. But there is any ruby, or sapphire, or perhaps        a diamond, of which the Church can treasure, adorn       itself with, clothe itself with, that is not ideologically        scratched by the philosophical slant from which        moves the distinguished Professor of Tübingen?………p. 358 76. For a start, a nice ruby: Professor Ratzinger would hate,        just like Professor Livi, “theological utilitarianism”.        Yeah, but then: why use it?…………………………………………p. 35977. Almost a diamond, the one on page 195,        where we discover that the doctrine of Jesus        is Jesus himself. Yes, very good. But… ……………………….p. 361  78. Unexpectedly a sapphire, and great, immense:       a boundless and moving sapphire like the celestial vault..p. 36379. We conclude by adorning ourselves with an amethyst,       and let’s go back to the problem from which we started:        and good “Tübingen” to make it a question of method…p. 36880. Conclusion: MENE – TEKEL – PERES.       What does it mean?……………………………………………….p. 372       MENE Dn 5:26       « God as computed Your Kingdom – Your life –        and ended it ».       At the heart of Ratzinger. By Pope Ratzinger:       “Repent, and You will save not only Your life,       but that of the whole Church!”……………………………….p. 379       TEKEL Dn 5:27      « You were weighed on the scales        and You were been found insufficient ».        At the heart of the Pastor of the Church.        Of all the Pastor of the Church:        “Choose: are You Catholics,       or are You Ratzingerians, that is Modernists?”………..p. 388       PERES Dn 5:28      « Your Kingdom will be divided       and given to the Medes and the Persians ».       At the heart of the antipope, yes:        by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio.       “Return the Throne you usurped,        and the Lord will look back at you!”……………………….p. 397(Pagina protetta dai diritti editoriali). (Torna su.) * * *  Oppure può essere richiesto – col 15% di sconto sul prezzo di copertina, dedica e copia numerata –, così come possono essere richiesti i cinque articoli integrativi sopra segnalati, con una E-MAILall’Autore.* * * https://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/emr/aureadomus/blocco_bibliografia.html * * *INIZIO PAGINAHOMEPAGE · CONVIVIUM · ACÙLEUS · HORTUS · GYMNASIUM ROMANO AMERIO · EIKÒNA · THESAURUS · CALENDARIUM

CERCA NEL SITOhttps://enricomariaradaelli.it/emr/aureadomus/barra_libri.htmlHOMEPAGE > CONVIVIUM INDICE Enrico Maria Radaelli * AT THE HEART OF RATZINGER.  HE IS THE POPE, NOT THE OTHER.The non-Renunciation of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013 it is the direct fruit of “Ratzingerism”, the taught heresy for fifty years by Pope Joseph Ratzinger in his Introduction to Christianity. Pro manuscripto illustrated, editions Aurea Domus, in-8°, Preface by H.E.R. Mgr. René Henry Gracida.  Milan 2022, pp. 469, € 60,00, at 15% discount, = € 45,00, equivalent to dollar § 50;  (You can request it with an E-MAIL to the Author, payment with Paypal) * * * ONE BOOK ALONE AGAINST  EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE,  OR ONE BOOK TO SAVE  EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE ?* * * FRONT* * *BACK* * *First: a book against Pope Ratzinger or a book to save Pope Ratzinger?  Breaking the veil with which even the most apparently faithful Pastors of the Church have blinded their eyes for nine years in order to hide the truth, the book I am proposing shows, for the first time in the world, all the very gravely erroneous and articulated doctrine Hegelian taught since 1967 at the University of Tübingen by Prof. Ratzinger, who, climbing the most important steps of the Magisterium to the highest, is revered by all as the most formidable champion of the faith.  Now, given that de internis non iudicat prætor, objective, public facts are found in the book, given which, see pp. 357-8, with great apprehension Pope Benedict is shown the only way to save himself from the grave danger that would await him if he does not disavow his terrible doctrines.* * *Second: a book against the “Ratzingerians” or to save the “Ratzingerians”? On this basis, for the first time in the world it is shown with the most irrefutable and rigorous evidence that the Renunciation made on 11 February 2013 by Benedict XVI is invalid and null and void, and only because it was elaborated on the basis of the erroneous Hegelian doctrine of which above, which all the Cardinals and Bishops of the Church have supinely accepted, except two, one of whom also wanted to draft the important Preface now placed at the end of the book. However, if these Pastors recognize that the Renunciation is invalid, as demonstrated on pp. LXXVI ff. and on pp. 366-8, the writer here is the first to point out that they too would save themselves from the terrible punishment that awaits those who adhere to erroneous doctrines, always in compliance with the above judicial principle.* * *Third: a book against “Francis” or a book to save “Francis”? From what has been said it follows that “Francis” is in reality an anti-pope, so that what has just been said also applies to him: if he too recognizes that the Conclave which (knowing he is electing an anti-pope: the facts are objective) elected him on the 13th March 2013 is invalid and null, he too will return to obey the Laws of God, as indicated throughout the book, especially on pp. 375-7, thus perhaps saving himself as his modernist accomplices from the punishment reserved for those who betray the Law of God. * * * TO SHAKE THE CHURCH FROM THE MODERNIST SPELL         OF RATZINGERISM TAKES A DIVINE INTERVENTION.   This book should have been little more than a pedantic and perhaps boring doctrinal critical investigation, and instead it immediately revealed much more than that, because somehow a kind of drama soon took to life in it, almost a Greek tragedy in which all the important doctrinal concepts have as though withdrawn into the background, as if they were just a large scenario, the severe landscape more and more tormented and anguished, in which events take place that have taken more and more life, breaking up in a jolt in a conclusion from page to page more and more pressing, unexpected, and, as will be seen, overwhelming.    And this is the point: that this metaphysical essay, wearing the increasingly evident and dramatic garments of a Greek tragedy, turns out to be even more than an invented work, which is precisely a Greek tragedy, showing itself as the crudest and ruthless photograph of a precise fact: that of the Church and the world caught today in their most hasty flight from reality. That is, better: in their most hasty flight from God: from the reality of God. And it is precisely from this detailed and documented discovery that the drama was born: from the merciless photograph of a precise, very current and global event; but, even before that, it is precisely from here that the rigorous, documented and scientific philosophical analysis of those Ratzingerian doctrines from which that drama came to life was born.    And this is where the book “exploded”. Yes: it really “exploded” into unexpected and very lively images of Angels, Archangels, Cherubs and Serafini, because its almost five hundred pages were suddenly animated by unexpected Celestial Creatures, don’t ask me how, don’t ask why, as if the thousand terrible doctrinal truths unfolded had felt the most imperative need to make everyone see clearly, from the first to the last page, the faces, eyes, mouths and lips of those who were really uttering those terrible and powerful words of indisputable truth, so that, among a hundred clouds torn here and there by darting rays of the sun or by flashes of lightning and lightning, they came to life, among those writings of high metaphysics about a more than justly much loved and universally well appreciated personality, and we are obviously talking about Pope Joseph Ratzinger, dozens of ineffable creatures who somehow made their way between the lines, the drop caps, the references, the headlines, shaking them and violating them. and with no respect for the structural order, now with the most moving, weeping and painful sweetness, now with the most unusual roughness and arrogance, in any case always without having asked anyone’s permission, certainly not me. Result? I wish the readers were to judge him. We could perhaps imagine this strange book with a somewhat four-faced look as if it were not at all shy, but determined, unstoppable and comely last Muse, also released, like all her other sweet sisters, due to the urgency of the Truth to show us that it can reach our hearts not only through the irresistible force of the most reasoned and solid logic, but because it is precisely this Truth, in itself Truth, that is attractive, that is splendid, that is beautiful, that is, that is boundlessly desirable, to be married immediately and forever.Why marry? Because the Truth that lives in Beauty is our Lord Jesus Christ himself, Verbum et Imago Dei, and he is our Spouse, it is He who awaits us from heaven, to make us live forever. Forever, do you understand? Together with him, in the Father’s arms of love. What are we waiting to be convinced?  * * *Here, in a nutshell, are the eighteen serious heretical deviations that I was able to detect in my study, published for four years under the title At the heart of Ratzinger. At the heart of the world, and which I believe to have been taught for fifty years by Professor Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, in his Introduction to Christianity, fifteen of which were struck by the Church – and once even three times –, in its long history, by due anàtemized, and which together gives rise to pluriery, never disavowed by its Author, indeed at least three times clearly reaffirmed, which gives rise to “RATZINGERISM”:1), the most springing and initial deviation: adoption of the Kierkegaard-Pascalian fideistic model, for which the metaphysical knowledge of God is impossible (see, in At the heart of Ratzinger, §§ 11-21); 2), the most incisive: subversion of the order of the Persons of the divine Monotriad, that is, not perceived but implemented and systematic inversion of the metaphysical order that will and intellect must have (the will, which proceeds, is made to precede the intellect), thus making the SS. Trinity an arbitrary and dictatorial God as in the erroneous Islamic notion, so as to lose his two most substantial qualities: the reason and the love (throughout the book, especially in §§ 65-6 and 70); anathematized; 3), the most devastating: consequent recourse to the postulates of practical reason: replacement of reasons for believing with the will to believe. Thus theory is replaced with praxis, which however, as we know, is not suitable for reasoning, but rather constitutes its stumbling block that devastates and annihilates it, that is, it is its error (see §§ 11-21) ; anathematized; 4), the most modernist: adoption of the skeptical Fideistic doubt based on knowledge, assuming as a criterion precisely what constitutes the surest vehicle of cognitive uncertainty, placing it in the first place at the basis of the knowledge taught by the Church: supernatural knowledge, or witness, or by faith (§ § 11-6);anathematized;5), the most tragedy: the conviction that God remains “essentially invisible”, even in the beatific vision of Paradise (§ 18); 6),the most antiscientific: the evident if not explicit disavowal of the divine origin of the Bible, for which it would be man who conjectures things about God, and not God who with His Word teaches man what man must know about He and must then do (§§ 64 and 69); anathematized;  7),the most atheist: to reduce the notions and prophecies of the Holy Scriptures concerning invisible realities such as Hell and devil or miraculous such as the divine and virginal sonship of Jesus Christ to imaginative and semi-pagan mythologisms (in several points, especially in §§ 64-5); anathematized; 8),the most idealistically cause initial: the evident but not explicit disregard of the reality principle, which moreover can only be found in the principle of source “innascence”, or “of in-birth” of God the Father, and, metaphysically speaking, nowhere else (§§ 10 and 25);  9), the most idealistically consequent: splitting of the Papacy into “Active Papacy” and “Passive Papacy” within a “Synodal Papacy”, in the typical, unreasonable, unrealistic and anti-Catholic idealistic Heg-elian scheme of “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” (§ 22);anathematized; 10), the most Pantheistic-Spinosian: to make thinking coincide in God with creating, with the consequent conviction that therefore the essence of God would be involved in His creation and in human history (§§ 19, 42 and 63; anathematized; 11), the most absurd (but ideologically necessary for the Ratzingerism): connote God as “God of Freedom”, charging Him with two aspects then transmitted, by analogy, to the world created by Him: elusiveness and unpredictability, as in the false notion of God elaborated later by Mohammed, and, nine hundred years later, by Luther, by Calvin and the “enlightenment” atheists of all centuries, including those of today (§§ 24-26); anathematized; 12), the most unlikely antitrinitarian: to introduce in the essence of God, in addition to the concept of Logos, that of Diá-logos, or “Colloquium”, for which the three Persons “dialogue” with each other as with man; the antipope will take the matter to the extreme, arguing that « the three Persons quarrel », because the dialogue of a “God of Freedom” cannot have boundaries (§§ 55-60 and 66); but the essence of God has no motion: in it there is only one, unique, all-en-compassing and eternal “SuperThought”: the Logos; anathematized; 13), THE MOST SERIOUS: rejection and annihilation of the divine, ineffable Redemption as the ‘Holocaust Sacrifice of God the Son, in Jesus Christ, to God the Father’, confirmed in 2016 – in an interview with Jacques Servais s.j. – as a fact « unacceptable by modern man », that is, in reality, by Pope Ratzinger himself (§§ 39-43 and 62-5); anathematized; 14), the most reductive: the belief that Redemption is “the attainment, in Christ ‘Omega’, of the perfect man” with a Teilhardian imprint (§§ 44-7); anathematized; 15), the most devastating: cancellation of original sin, of the concept of sin as an “offense to God”, of Hell, of the devil, of Purgatory, of Heaven, as well as of the final and definitive separation of the “pious people” from the “impious”, because it too is « unacceptable by modern man », that is, always by Ratzinger, also here hidden behind the periphrasis « modern man » (§§ 50-3); anathematized;       16), the most illogical and depressing: cancellation of the glorious bodies of the blessed in Paradise, including those of Christ and the Virgin (§§ 50-1);     17), the most repulsive: the conviction that « the doctrine of the divinity of Jesus would not be affected if Jesus were born of a human marriage », with all the multiple, serious and heretical consequences that this entails (§ 71); anathematized; and three times; 18), the most ecumenist: the opinion that the Church’s unconsutable tunic, due to the splits caused by the disobedience and rebellions of the heretics, is today « divided into multiple churches » (§ 72); anathematized. * * *CONTENTS. (Come back up)     Foreword of René Henry Gracida………………………………….p. I  First Part. PREQUEL: ON THE RENUNCIATION OF POPE BENEDICT XVI.    1. The reason why we call these pages “Prequel”.………..p. V    2. Today, Romano Amerio would affirm:        “Benedict XVI’s Resignation is invalid,         null and void. Ratzinger is still the Pope.         Bergoglio is an antipope.”        The reason is the following………………………………………p. VII     3.How did we arrive to the present disgraceful situation…..p. X     4. What is the good that the Church must always pursue…..p. XII     5. The terms of the problem…………………………………………..p. XV    6. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus        Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ according to       the meaning attributed to them from Magisterium       of the Church………………………………………………………..p. XVII         7. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus        Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ according to       the meaning attributed to them since fifty years        from Pope Benedict XVI’s – Joseph Ratzinger’s       in his ancient and never retracted Hegelian ideology…..p. XXII                                            8. The three notions of ‘Munus Petrinum’, ‘Munus        Episcopi’ and ‘ministerium Episcopi’ in the meaning       attributed to them from Pope Benedict XVI’s in his       Declaratio of Resignation of February 11, 2013………..p. XXIV       9. Logical-semantic analysis of the Farewell Speech       held by Benedict XVI of February 27, 2013…………….p. XXVII  10. The notions of ‘Bishop emeritus’ end of ‘Pope       emeritus’ according to the Magisterium of the        Church. Do we have here a legislative vacuum       or only the will to do whatever one wants?……………p. XXX  11. First conclusions of the logic-semantic analysis        on Benedict XVI’s Declaratio and Farewell Speech…p. XXXV  12. The arguments of invalidity of Pope        Benedict XVI’s Resignation of the Papacy         with regard to a juridical-canonical validation.        First aspect: is the Resignation invalided       by external elements?………………………………………p. XXXVII  13.The arguments of invalidity of Pope        Benedict XVI’s Resignation of the Papacy        with regard to a juridical-canonical validation.        Second aspect: is the Resignation invalided       by internal elements?..……………………………………..p. XL       14. CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………..p. XLIV  15. Finally, there is a reasoning that doesn’t give alternatives: neither to the Pope, nor to anyone        else: the Pope is and remains Benedict XVI.       The reasoning that we say is called        “Disjunctive vel”. There it is.………………………………p. XLVII 15.A. First reflection, based on the premise ‘p’,   which says: You are Pope, yes, albeit ‘emeritus’.…p. LI  15.B. Second reflection, based on the premise ‘q’,         as opposed to ‘p’: No, You are not Pope,  because You has renounced it.…………………………….p. LIV  Post Scriptum. Where and how this work is inserted in the vast       panorama of the very significant studies      existing on the topic today on the subject……………..p. LVII Annotation in the margin of the II par of p. XXVII (*),   of the II par of p. XLIII (**)  end IV par of p. XLV (***)…………………………………..p. LXVIII            The Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicates         Pope Ratzinger (and with him the whole Church).       And You, Pope Ratzinger, what are You waiting       for to save Yourself from excommunication       (and save, with You, the whole Church)?…………….p. LXVIII      Is perhaps a universal self-excommunication        of the Church possible? Yes, it is possible:        isn’t that just what is happening today?……………..p. LXXVII Second Part. ON THE TEACHING OF JOSEPH RATZINGER  IN HIS STUDY INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIANITY.       Anthology of the eighteen (18!) most serious        heresies found in Introduction to Christianity,        never retracted, indeed three times, even recently,        by their Author confirmed, fifteen of which (five out        of six) already struck by precise anàthemas.…………….p. 373     1. Equalities and inequalities…………………………………………..p. 17    2. Who is the true “Master of doubt”         of the super-doubtful Cardinal Archbishop        Monsignor Carlo Maria Martini ………………………………….p. 19    3. First: what is the task of a catholic theologian       regarding the “Norma normans” of the Faith?       Second: is this task also performed        by Prof. Ratzinger?…………………………………………………..p. 22    4. The non-catholic heaven of the Professor from        Tübinghen’s book, Introduction to Christianity       – which by an ideological choice is a historicist,        anti-metaphysical and fideistic book – anticipates       the sky without dogma of today’s antipope “Francis”……..p. 26    5. Why an old book of fifty years ago is as important        is as few other books in the word……………………………….p. 31    6. How to empty the doctrine of Faith from inside.        Or from where, how, and through whom the current         devastating secularization of the West has been spread……p. 36        7. Metaphysical methodology and historical methodology:       that is catholic and anti-catholic, that is, modernist.       Which one will Prof. Mons. Ratzinger have chosen?………p. 42                                            8. The historicist, anti-metaphysical, anti-scientific,        and anti-catholic methodology of the Theologian       from Tübingen.…………………………………………………………p. 47       9. If the exclusion of the correct investigation tools,         which are moreover a duty and mandatory,         can constitute a method……………………………………………….p. 51  10. The historicist method is the theologian’s drug.        And the Protestant and Lutheran leaders are its pushers…..p. 54  11. One by one, the Professor’s main statements       of Tübingen on the problems of doubt of Faith.………….p. 59 12. The doubt. The only thing of which,        for Professor Ratzinger, one must never doubt……………….p. 62 13. You will never insist enough on certainty that God       wants to instill in us: to be knowable by us. More:       that His knowledge is by God strongly wanted……………….p. 67  14. Perfect theoreticality of the reasoning of Faith.        Total unreasonableness of any doubt about Faith…………….p. 70      15. The crossroads of Ratzingerian thought is not       Faith, but doubt. And precisely the skeptical doubt.…..p. 72 16. The Ratzingerian skeptical doubt, father of the new era of Faith: the ‘Mobilist’ Faith………….p. 74 17. What ever might conclude of good, a reason that       made it self unable to be, as it should, very certain       of the truth it knows, one reason, that is, which,         by it self, has made it self powerless and incapable        of reasoning correctly?……………………………………………….p. 78  18.Professor Ratzinger has every reason to have such        a dramatically skeptical Faith: how does a man have       a luminous Faith in a God which for him will always        be « the essentially Invisible »?…………………………………….p. 81  19. Here we are, at last it comes to light a doctrine        that dangerously approaches Professor Ratzinger       to nothing less than Baruc Spinoza. And not only………p. 87  20. Kantius genuit Kierkegaardium, Kierkegardius genuit autem Coxium, Coxius inde genuit Ratzingerium,       Ratzingerius vero genuit Martinum, Martinus denique……p. 92     21. The fideistic skepticism of the Tübingen         Professor is it perhaps subject to some         ecclesiastical censorship?…………………………………………..p. 94  22. The heretical Ratzingerian concept of the active Papacy       and the passive Papacy as a direct reflection of the        scheme idealistic Hegelian-like of  “believer and        non-believer”……………………………………………………………..p. 97   23. God said: « Look for Me in a horrid region »,        or not rather: « Do not look for Me        in a horrid region »? (Isaiah 45:19; tr. CEI 74.)……………p. 103  24. To much “relationship”, in the Professor’s theology,       and no “substance”: “But it’s the anti-metaphysics,       my dear. It is from here that the Church       has lost the principle of reality.”………………………………….p. 104  25. The most appropriate definition of the “religious   philosophy”, as Livi would call it, of the Professor  Joseph Ratzinger, is: “Ultra-Idealist Philosophy”:        “Beyond Idealism”.…………………………………………………p. 111  26. If the “God Freedom” conjectured in 1967 in       Tübingen resembles the notion of God elaborated  in 610 by Mohammed and that reworked   in the Sixteenth century by Luther and Calvin.………..p. 114  27. What binds and what unties the uncertainties  of skeptical doubt to the certainties         of the “Common sense” of Mgr. Livi and of Faith…….p. 118  28. For Professor Ratzinger and Cardinal Martini       perhaps that Faith is a perpetual wave-like motion?………p. 122  29. The one professed by Professor Ratzinger and by       Cardinal Martini is a heretic ‘voluntary doubt’, or is it       merely ‘an excessive preoccupation with believing’?…….p. 129  30. From the skeptical doubt of the Professor of Tübingen        to « synodal polyhedral » of the antipope “Francis”:        total abolition of all truthful certainty, to begin with from       that of the five certainties of the “Common sense”………..p. 133       31. If it can be said that a Christian “does not have”       the truth, who does not posses the truth,         as the antipope “Francis” says.………………………………..p. 136  32. Can’t Popes be judged and censored? In that case are        to be judged and censored a Professor and a Cardinal……p. 141  33. If the heretical palindrome conjectured in 1967 by the       Professor of Tübingen, confirmed and perfected in 1988       by a ultra-Cardinal of Milan, finally summarized in 2015       even by an antipope, it annihilates the whole Church…….p. 144  34.Thanks to the “Farmer”, we understand the “Prof”;        worse: thanks to an antipope we understand the Pope.       More: thanks to an antipope idolatrous        we understand a Pope heretical. That is, how much        ultra-extremist it is was believed moderate.……………..p. 147  35. Who is it, for the Tübingen Professor and for the man       of today, the protagonist on the world scene:        is it perhaps God, which, however, don’t be seen,        or is it the man, who instead be seen?………………………….p. 151  36. The real drama – tó dràma – is between Heaven       and earth, between God and man.        But Prof. Ratzinger does not notice it at all………………….p. 156  37. Since God, provided He exists, provided He speaks,       He didn’t speak first, who ever did then?…………………….p. 160  38. And forgiveness too, who brought it into the world?       God brought it or men brought it?………………………………p. 164  39. We enter the drama of the Heavens.          And of the Heavens of Heavens: the drama        of an indignant God the Father, and of His Son          – He too God –, to Him in His own sacrificed blood.       We enter there whereit really does not want       to enter, and never is entered, the historicist        Professor from Tübingen.………………………………………..p. 168 40. For the Church it is the central “liturgical dogma”.       For Professor Ratzinger (and future Pope)        it is « a cruel one and unacceptable mechanism ».        Who is right?…………………………………………………………..p. 171  41. I ask: the millions of Masses celebrated        according to the Novus Ordo Missæ        of Pope Paul VI, are under anàthema?…………………….p. 174  42. In full Soteriology, appears again Spinoza………………….. p. 180  43. “Lamb of God”: yea, to appease the indignation of God,       the Lamb can only be of God.        But in what sense “of God”?………………………………………p. 18344. Prolegomena to an evolutionary theology:        “Cosmic Doubt” plus “Cosmic Evolutionism”,        equal to…?…………………………………………………………….p. 188  45. Where, how and when was born the transformation         of the rocky society founded on Jesus Christ into the       liquid society dissolved in the putrescent liberal acid…….p. 194  46. The fluid and putrescent society of today is all born        from a fluid and putrescent Church, which is to say         from a Church false-pastoral, i.e. hypo-dogmatic,         born from a fluid and putrescent Council, i.e. from         a false-pastoral Council, that is hypo-dogmatic:       the very modernist Ecumenical Council Vatican II…..p. 198 47. Professor Ratzinger, in short: Evolution        or Redemption? “Mais naturellement, oui:  ‘Èvoludemption’! In English ‘Evoludemption’!That’s what they say, right?”…………………………………..p. 202                                           48. The fanciful and palpable contradictions        of an antipope, and the false and non-existent       contradictions of the Truth…………………………………………p. 207                                           49. How Ratzingerian Ultra-Idealism – surpassing himself,        as indeed was predictable –  it has become        “the Ratzinger-Teilhardian Theological System”……………p. 208                                           50. To Catholic dogma absolutely not enough that        Paradise is located « in the memory of God ».        To Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, on the contrary, instead yes. Who is right?………………………………………..p. 212  51. The « resuscitation of the bodies » according to the two       New Cathars: Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin s. j. and       the Monsignor Joseph Aloisius Professor Ratzinger………p. 216  52. No devils, for Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, nor damned.    The Hell, in fact, is not only empty, but, for him,     it isn’t even there………………………………………………………p. 228  53. So no devils, damned and Hell, for the Prof. Ratzinger,        but not even Limbo, Purgatory and Paradise. Thus       is solved at the root “the Great Problem of Evil”.……..p. 230 54. Add “Christ Omega” to “Christ Community”. This,       with the drafting of Introduction to Christianity, is the       large strategy of Professor Joseph Mgr. Ratzinger.…..p. 23955. Says “Tübingen”: « In the one and indivisible God exists       the phenomenon of dialogue ». But motion, in God, doesn’t exist. So, how can there be ‘dialogue’,  which certainly is a motion?……………………………………….p. 244                                           56.  The Professor Ratzinger is the real great theorist of the        II Vatican Council: it is he who has been able to find in the         SS. Trinity the cornerstone of the praxis there born and        brought to full maturity by the antipope Bergoglio……….p. 24857.  Trinitarian continuity and discontinuity, that are  substantial, decisive, between the Prof. of Tübingen        and the antipope today increasingly indecently        reigning.…………………………………………………………………p. 25458. The Professor of Tübingen does not even imagine       what hides the Trinitarian « diá-lógos » invented       by him.. But the non-Pope “fake simpleton”        understood this immediately.…………………………………..p. 258                                                                        59. The small Greek particle ‘diá’ is the Ratzingerian least       iota that, exploding in three powerful errors, it subverts       the essence of God and the whole earth, as it can only        the most furious spiritual cataclysm in the world…………..p. 261 60. Says the Professor from Tübingen: « The three         Persons of the SS. Trinity dialogue ». « No – says        the antipope “Francis” firmly –, the three Persons        quarrel, but they do not show it ».………………………………p. 26361. “To dialogue! To dialogue!” They shouted joyfully          the Fathers of the II Vatican Council leaving St. Peter’s        “(Thus the world will no longer grimly at us)”……………..p. 267            62. There is a problem: that “the Great Problem of Evil”       is exalted by the Redemption of Christ,        which frees man from things as sin, death and Hell,        which however are no there left. So what do we do?        Simple: you change Redemption.……………………………..p. 270  63. Analysis of what is called “medium term”, that is,        of the topics chosen by the Professor of Tübingen       to “forget” the work of Redemption of Jesus Christ………p. 274  64. But the narrator of the Holy Scriptures is it God       or is the Professor of  Tübingen?…………………………………p. 279  65. Analysis of the final conclusions reached by the Professor       Ratzinger for remove, indeed for cancel, without        being seen by none, the Redemption of Jesus Christ……..p. 288  66. ‘Diá’ and ‘relation’. Two of the many small iota        not to be included in any way in the Catholic doctrine        on the SS. Trinity.         But inserted secretly by a Professor of Tübingen……..p. 296                       67. The basic Christological error of the Theologian        of Tübingen it is to place the starting point        of the Catholic Faith in the Cross, and not, as it is,        in the glory of the Resurrection…………………………………..p. 300 68. The premise necessary and sufficient to solve all the problems       that arise from the “Great Problem of Evil”………………….p. 304  69. Here are all the problems of the “Great Problem of Evil”.       But also their holy, unique and Christ-like solution…..p. 309  70. How can serious explanatory work be transformed       of the doctrine in a dangerous ideology,        that is, in horrid idol………………………………………………….p. 321  71. Let us now speak of the Blessed Virgin.       “But why – asks Professor Ratzinger –,        must She be a virgin? There was no need”.……………….p. 326 72. Professor Ratzinger, tell us: the Church of Christ        is or is not only and uniquely the Roman Catholic        Apostolic Church?……………………………………………………p. 34273. Without Livi’s notion of  “Common sense”, there is        a big risk: even that the idol ‘community’ be born – as         Professor Ratzinger does – from the Holy Scriptures……p. 348 74. Sacrificed to the Ratzingerian idol ‘Community’       also the lively and most loving hermit spirituality…………p. 354  75. But there is any ruby, or sapphire, or perhaps        a diamond, of which the Church can treasure, adorn       itself with, clothe itself with, that is not ideologically        scratched by the philosophical slant from which        moves the distinguished Professor of Tübingen?………p. 358 76. For a start, a nice ruby: Professor Ratzinger would hate,        just like Professor Livi, “theological utilitarianism”.        Yeah, but then: why use it?…………………………………………p. 35977. Almost a diamond, the one on page 195,        where we discover that the doctrine of Jesus        is Jesus himself. Yes, very good. But… ……………………….p. 361  78. Unexpectedly a sapphire, and great, immense:       a boundless and moving sapphire like the celestial vault..p. 36379. We conclude by adorning ourselves with an amethyst,       and let’s go back to the problem from which we started:        and good “Tübingen” to make it a question of method…p. 36880. Conclusion: MENE – TEKEL – PERES.       What does it mean?……………………………………………….p. 372       MENE Dn 5:26       « God as computed Your Kingdom – Your life –        and ended it ».       At the heart of Ratzinger. By Pope Ratzinger:       “Repent, and You will save not only Your life,       but that of the whole Church!”……………………………….p. 379       TEKEL Dn 5:27      « You were weighed on the scales        and You were been found insufficient ».        At the heart of the Pastor of the Church.        Of all the Pastor of the Church:        “Choose: are You Catholics,       or are You Ratzingerians, that is Modernists?”………..p. 388       PERES Dn 5:28      « Your Kingdom will be divided       and given to the Medes and the Persians ».       At the heart of the antipope, yes:        by Jorge Mario Cardinal Bergoglio.       “Return the Throne you usurped,        and the Lord will look back at you!”……………………….p. 397(Pagina protetta dai diritti editoriali). (Torna su.) * * *  Oppure può essere richiesto – col 15% di sconto sul prezzo di copertina, dedica e copia numerata –, così come possono essere richiesti i cinque articoli integrativi sopra segnalati, con una E-MAILall’Autore.* * * https://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/emr/aureadomus/blocco_bibliografia.html * * *INIZIO PAGINAHOMEPAGE · CONVIVIUM · ACÙLEUS · HORTUS · GYMNASIUM ROMANO AMERIO · EIKÒNA · THESAURUS · CALENDARIUM

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

“FOX News Won’t Allow Mention of “2000 Mules” on Their Channel”: Are “Ruling Class… Liars” RINO Fox and Tucker Carlson Cartoon Characters? 

May 14, 2022

 

 

 

 https://youtu.be/ocJ1GTnmO-w 

FOX News Won’t Allow Mention of “2000 Mules” on Their Channel — Publishes Fraudulent List of Joe Biden’s Accomplishments That Includes 5 Straight Lies Instead -The Gateway Pundit 

Dinesh D’Souza

@DineshDSouza

If you want to see how abusively 

@TuckerCarlson

and his 

@FoxNews

team deal with people, read this thread. It’s an exchange between me and Tucker’s executive producer 

@justinbwells [https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1525102708725796864]

“Expect instead a [liberal and “conservative”] media typhoon of propaganda insisting that the results are all legit, that any anomaly you think you see (or saw) is a “conspiracy theory,” or at any rate innocently explainable by mundane process details too boring to get into… “

“… [T]he system is rigged, the process is fake, the ruling class are liars… [the American people] themselves are subjects and not citizens—anything but a free people with a say over its own destiny. If the ruling class can get away with this, they will be able to get away with anything.” – Michael Anton [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/biden-steals-meaning-media-ruling-class.html]

Are Tucker Carlson, Fox and 95 percent of “Conservative” Media like ridiculous cartoon characters? 

In the old Warner Brothers cartoon the rooster Foghorn Leghorn’s archenemy and fall guy George P. Dog was on a leash which meant he could only go as far as the length of the rope leash and had to stop.

Foghorn even painted a line on the ground with a sign reading “Rope Limit” which George P. Dog could never go beyond.

Why are Tucker Carlson and 95 percent of “conservative” media such Fox, the New York Post and Washington Times as well as “conservative” talk radio like Leghorn’s archenemy George P. Dog not allowed to go passed the line with the sign that reads “Rope Limit”?

Why is the massive voter fraud “constitutional travesty” Biden Steal cover-up of the liberal media the “Rope Limit” for Fox and Tucker?

Why is even discussing the possibility of the massive voter fraud “constitutional travesty” Biden Steal cover-up of the liberal media and FBI beyond the “Rope Limit”?

Who and/or what has made Tucker Carlson, Fox and 95 percent of “conservative” media into George P. Dog with a rope leash and a “Rope Limit.”

Who or what controls them?

Why are they forbidden to even give reasoned arguments, instead of straw man arguments that don’t counter the stated dissertations or name calling, against Dinesh D’Souza, constitutional experts like Kenneth Starr and the sworn testimony of voter fraud by hundreds of whistleblowers as well as expert statisticians and voter machine experts?

If they really think those who present evidence on the Biden Steal such as Dinesh D’Souza, constitutional experts like Kenneth Starr and sworn testimony by voter fraud whistleblowers as well as expert statisticians and voter machine experts are lying and headed to hell for lying then out of simple charity for our souls they should counter our dissertations and arguments.

If they are Christians and really believe we are wrong and headed to hell for lying and refuse to give us real arguments then they apparently have lost the supernatural virtue of charity.

If they really believe what they say then for charity’s sake they should attempt to save us from hell for lying on such an important matter:

But, all we hear are straw man arguments that don’t counter our stated dissertations, name calling propaganda, silence or the noise of them running away as fast as they can from serious reasoned back and forth argumentation.

Just to give fair warning:

We are not going away.

We are growing.

Soon we will be to be too big to ignore and your credibility will forever be destroyed.

Here is just the iceberg tip of the mountain of evidence that there was voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– Dominion Contractor Says She Witnessed Fraudulent Actions at Detroit Ballot-Count Site [https://www.theepochtimes.com/dominion-contractor-says-she-witnessed-fra]

–  AWFUL. Tucker Carlson Doubles Down, Hits Sidney Powell and Says No Evidence of Switching Votes — HERE ARE 11 TIMES THEY GOT CAUGHT SWITCHING VOTES (Video) [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/disgusting-tucker-carlson-doubles-hits-sidney-powell-says-no-evidence-switching-votes-11-times-got-caught-switching-votes-video/]

– Mark Levin said “The Washington Post FLAT OUT LIED,” but did Francis & Tucker Carlson Lie? [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/mark-levin-said-washington-post-flat.html and https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/insulting-demanding-rude-told-never-contact-sidney-powell-goes-off-tucker-carlson-video/]

 – Fellow at Hoover Institution: “To Lose a Margin of 58 to 41 with 600 to 700 Thousand Votes with One & Half million Mail-in Ballots… how… Statistically Possible”[https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/fellow-at-hoover-institution-to-lose.html]

 – On Oct. 11, Judge “Agreed” that “Dominion… presented ‘Serious System Security Vulnerability… Issues that may place… Voters at Risk… of their… Right to Cast an Effective Vote'” [ttps://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/on-oct-11-judge-agreed-that-dominion.html]

– Exclusive: Rep. Paul Gosar Suggests Some Election Results ‘Very Skewed,’ Citing Reported Software Glitch [https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-rep-paul-gosar-suggests-some-election-results-very-skewed-citing-reported-software-glitch_3569629.html]

– “INCONCEIVABLE”: “Exact same Ratio” Hour after hour was “% Biden 54” to “% Trump 45” can “make No Logical Sense other than to Assume Fraud” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/inconceivable-exact-same-ratio-hour.html]

– “STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE”: There’s “1 Nonagintillion is equal to 1.0E+261 trillions” Chance that there was no Biden Voter Fraud in the Georgia Election [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/statistically-impossible-theres-1.html]

– Attorney Barnes: “Media Gaslighting… Now Sworn Testimony Doesn’t Count as ‘Evidence’? 90% of all Evidence… is Testimonial Evidence” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/attorney-barnes-media-gaslighting-now.html and 
[https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1326993408779575297 and Hundreds provide testimonies — but no real evidence — in Trump campaign lawsuit to stop certification of Michigan election results https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/11/12/hundreds-provide-testimonies-but-no-real-evidence-in-trump-campaign-lawsuit-to-stop-certification-of-michigan-election-results/?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar]

– Voter Fraud Is Real, Elections Expert Says [https://www.theepochtimes.com/voter-fraud-is-real-expert_3529504.html]

– 2 Charged With Voter Fraud, Allegedly Submitted 8,000 Fraudulent Registration Applications [https://www.theepochtimes.com/2-charged-with-voter-fraud-allegedly-submitted-8000-fraudulent-registration-applications_3583016.html]

– 2012 Palm Beach Post: Dominion “’Shortcoming’ led to Votes being Assigned to the Wrong Candidates… Declaring the Wrong Winners”[https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/2012-palm-beach-post-dominion.html]

– MIT Ph.D Inventor of the Email: “Our Analysis in Michigan indicates a Computer Algorithm was likely used to Transfer 69,000 Votes”[https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/mit-phd-inventor-of-email-our-analysis.html and 
Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email@va_shiva: https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326595796947656716%5D

– Blabber Buzz News: “More Proof Of Fraud: ‘Hundreds Of Boxes’ Of Ballots ‘Ditched’, Then Found ‘Uncounted’ On Friday” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/blabber-buzz-news-more-proof-of-fraud.html]

– Democracy Institute Poll: “Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton in every Major Metro area around the Country, Save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/democracy-institute-poll-biden.html]

– The Director of The Democracy Institute Poll Basham presents the Overwhelming Evidence for “Ballot Fraud”https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-director-of-democracy-institute.html and https://democracyinstitute.org/patrick-bashams-sunday-express-article-assesses-us-election-pollingtemp/]

– Mark Levin: “The Washington Post FLAT OUT LIED” about [whistleblower] Richard Hopkins recanting his sworn statement [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/mark-levin-washington-post-flat-out-lied.html and Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow: https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1326572247239290880%5D

– High-profile Attorney Marcus: “Legacy Media are Lying when they Claim that all of President Trump’s Allegations of Voter Fraud are Baseless” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/high-profile-attorney-marcus-legacy.html and https://tikvahfund.org/faculty/jerome-marcus/ and https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/10/i-was-in-philadelphia-watching-fraud-happen-heres-how-it-went-down/]

– International Cold War Expert Dr. Kengor said of the Pennsylvania Voting Curve “I don’t see how this can be Statistically Possible” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-international-cold-war-expert-dr.html and 
[https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-paul-kengor-the-pennsylvania-voting-curve-doesnt-line-up_3569060.html]

– Bishop Gracida says “FRAUD: YOUR NAME IS DEMOCRAT”: “Report… Michigan USPS Whistleblower claims Superiors Instructed Employees to Back-date Mail-in-ballots coming in after November 3rd” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/bishop-gracida-says-fraud-your-name-is.html and “FRAUD: YOUR NAME IS DEMOCRAT”: https://abyssum.org/2020/11/05/fraud-your-name-is-democrat/]

– Washington Times: “352 U.S. Counties in 29 States Managed to have 1.8 million More Registered Voters than Eligible Voting-age Citizens” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/washington-times-352-us-counties-in-29.html and https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/20/judicial-watch-finds-18-million-ghost-voters-in-29/%5D

– Geller Report: “Wisconsin[‘s]… Total number of registered voters: 3,129,000. Total number of votes cast: 3,239,920… evidence of fraud” [ttps://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/geller-report-wisconsins-total-number.html and https://gellerreport.com/2020/11/fraud-wisconsin-has-more-votes-than-people-registered-to-vote.html/%5D

– South Florida Sun Sentinel : “Attempt to Register Dead People in Florida County Discovered” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/south-florida-sun-sentinel-attempt-to.html and https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/attempt-register-dead-people-florida-county-discovered%5D

– Poll: 30 Percent of Democrats “Believe the Election was Stolen from Trump” & apparently are Complicit in a “Criminal Conspiracy… Unparalleled in our History” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/poll-30-percent-of-democrats-believe.html]

– Could the Court Ruling on Alleghany County be the First Step to Flip Pennsylvania for President Trump? [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/could-court-ruling-on-alleghany-county.html and https://triblive.com/local/valley-news-dispatch/nicole-ziccarelli-asks-court-to-throw-out-undated-mail-in-ballots-in-senate-race/]

– Media Misinformation: “Thousands of Votes found for @realDonaldTrump in Georgia… so many Discrepancies… couldn’t even Certify a Winner for a Local Office… Media Response… NOTHING TO SEE HERE” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/media-misinformation-thousands-of-votes.html and 

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1326993408779575297 and Hundreds provide testimonies — but no real evidence — in Trump campaign lawsuit to stop certification of Michigan election results https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/11/12/hundreds-provide-testimonies-but-no-real-evidence-in-trump-campaign-lawsuit-to-stop-certification-of-michigan-election-results/?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar]

– The Hill: “Two Computers… contained Names, Addresses, Birthdates and Driver’s License Information for Every Voter in the State” of Georgia Stolen[https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-hill-two-computers-contained-names.html and 
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/461872-two-computers-stolen-from-atlanta-polling-site-contain-statewide-voter%5D

– Gateway Pundit: Rudy Giuliani revealed that Dominion Whistleblowers have “Evidence of the 100,000 Votes coming in. And they have some Photographs also” [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/gateway-pundit-rudy-giuliani-revealed.html and 

– Constitution Expert Ken Starr said “To Count every [“Illegal” Pennsylvania] Vote may be a Crime” & is a False, Absurd or Distorted Representation of the Constitution [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/constitution-expert-ken-starr-said-to.html and https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/11/09/ken-starr-pennsylvania-mail-in-ballot-extension-a-constitutional-travesty/, https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/travesty and https://nonvenipacem.com/2020/11/10/ken-starr-pa-mail-in-ballot-extension-a-constitutional-travesty/%5D

– Journalist O’Keefe: “RECORDING: Federal Agents ‘Coerce’ USPS Whistleblower Hopkins to Water Down Story. Hopkins Doubles Down”  [https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/journalist-okeefe-recording-federal.html and James O’Keefe@JamesOKeefeIII: 
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326323334800437248%5D

–Pre-Election Concerns Over Dominion Voting Systems Highlighted in Georgia Lawsuit Cyber security expert raised concerns over integrity of system, including external vulnerabilities, in sworn statement [https://www.theepochtimes.com/pre-election-concerns-over-dominion-voting-systems-highlighted-in-georgia-lawsuit_3576863.html]

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1] 

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

VIGANÒ’S DECLARATION on the arrest of His Eminence Cardinal Joseph Zen

Written by  Carlo Maria Viganò

Recently it was announced that Cardinal Joseph Zen has been arrested by the authorities in Hong Kong. The investigation and arrest was made by the special police section set up by the government of Beijing to watch over Chinese national security, that is, to suppress any form of dissent or protest over the violations of human rights committed by the Chinese dictatorship.

The elderly Cardinal – who in the past has expressed strong criticism of the secret Agreement signed between the Chinese regime and the Holy See – was interrogated and then released on bail. His passport was also confiscated. 

The elderly Cardinal – who in the past has expressed strong criticism of the secret Agreement signed between the Chinese regime and the Holy See – was interrogated and then released on bail. His passport was also confiscated. What has happened is a very grave violation of the freedoms and rights enjoyed by every human person, all the more deplorable in the case of a Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church. The Vatican Press Office, with obvious embarrassment, limited itself to expressing “concern” without making any formal protest to the Beijing government. Only a few days earlier, ten other priests of the Baoding community, who belong to the clandestine Church, were abducted and sent to forced “re-education” by the Chinese Communist Party because they were unwilling to join the patriotic sect, adding to the list of abuses and oppression against Catholics who are faithful to the underground Church.

The poisoned fruits of the Sino-Vatican Agreement are now apparent.

The poisoned fruits of the Sino-Vatican Agreement are now apparent. The Bergoglian church prefers to remain silent about the persecution of Catholics who belong to the clandestine Church after having handed them over to retaliations at the hands of the patriotic sect and the Chinese Communist Party. In exchange, Beijing rewards the Holy See for its services with substantial annual funding: the mercenaries allow themselves to be bought with thirty pieces of silver that are dripping with the blood of the martyrs of the Church of silence.

In September 2020, on the eve of the renewal of that infamous Agreement, Cardinal Zen came to Rome to meet Bergoglio, who humiliated him with an indignant refusal to meet with him because of the Chinese Cardinal’s well-known position on the Agreement and its repeated violations. This affront against a Prince of the Church gave a clear signal to the Chinese dictatorship, which then felt free to act without fearing consequences or that the Vatican would take a position. The tenant of the Vatican, however, finds time to receive high-ranking representatives of the New World Order, representatives of globalism and usurious finance, dictators and war criminals, and even the wives of the soldiers fighting in the neo-Nazi Azov battalion, which in the past few days used civilians as human shields during the Russian siege of the Azovstal steel plant. Someone pointed out that the Russian-Canadian activist Pyotr Verzilov accompanied two Ukrainian wives to the papal audience: he is the founder and spokesman of the feminist group Pu**y Riot, known for carrying out profanations and sacrileges against Orthodox churches in Russia, following the model of Femen in the West. It leaves us disconcerted that the representative of an anti-Christian movement that has made blasphemy the heart of its subversive action has been admitted to an audience at the Vatican.

This attitude of unequalled duplicity, that is anything but ambiguous, shows how Bergoglio’s deep church is totally aligned not only with the psycho-pandemic narrative but also with the insane management of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis by the deep state.

This attitude of unequalled duplicity, that is anything but ambiguous, shows how Bergoglio’s deep church is totally aligned not only with the psycho-pandemic narrative but also with the insane management of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis by the deep state. Cardinal Zen is added to the dubia Cardinals in the list of those to whom Bergoglio has never responded to or received in audience, even as he has personally handwritten a letter of support to James Martin, S.J. With that umpteenth endorsement, Bergoglio confirms that he intends to normalize the pan-sexualism of the infamous LGBTQ ideology within the Catholic Church, and along with it the consequent eternal perdition of many souls.

The wisdom and prudence of Vatican diplomacy, a precious legacy of centuries of experience that was once admired by all the Chanceries of the world, is today under the guidance of Pietro Parolin but a distant memory: courtly interests, economic profits, and criminal connivances all shamelessly prevail right before the eyes of both God and men. The faithful look on scandalized at the transformation of the Holy See into a den of thieves (Lk 19:46).

I exhort my brother Bishops and Priests as well as faithful laity to support His Eminence with prayer, expressing your closeness and solidarity with him at this difficult time. May the trials to which Cardinal Zen is being subjected merit from Heaven that reward which the Lord has promised.

I exhort my brother Bishops and Priests as well as faithful laity to support His Eminence with prayer, expressing your closeness and solidarity with him at this difficult time. May the trials to which Cardinal Zen is being subjected merit from Heaven that reward which the Lord has promised to those who serve the Holy Church with fidelity and who remain steadfast in the Faith, without allowing themselves to be contaminated by the spirit of the world.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

13 May 2022

Anniversary of the apparition 

of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima

Medievalists vs. the Middle Ages

Why historians hate history.

Michael Warren DavisMay 13

Earlier this year, I reviewed a book called The Bright Ages: A New History of Medieval Europe by Matthew Gabriele and David M. Perry.  I don’t want to pile on (again) but, let it suffice to say, it was possibly the worst book I’ve ever read.  

For instance, the authors say that, for too long, medievalism has been a tool of white supremacy.  And it’s true that racists have an affinity for medieval Europe, for obvious reasons.  But here’s how Gabriele and Perry tackle the issue:

The authors say of these white supremacists, “They looked into both the medieval and classical European past and imagined they found white faces, like theirs, looking back at them.  They were wrong about all of this.”  You’ll have to take my word for it, but there’s no context for this remark.  The authors seem to be arguing that whiteness doesn’t exist because 10th century Europe was actually full of black people.  If so, that would certainly take the wind out of the alt-right’s sails, though I’d really like to see their proof.

That should tell you everything you need to know.

Well, The Bright Ages is now at the center of an online fracas, because the authors are accused of being—get this—too right-wing.  

According to a report in The New York Times, a Dr. Mary Rambaran-Olm also wrote a strongly negative review of the book. Dr. Rambaran-Olm’s review was slated to appear in The Los Angeles Review of Books.  But the LARB ended up pulling the review, because…  well, that’s what the fracas is about.

Dr. Rambaran-Olm accuses the editors of “torpedoing” her review because they’re friends with Gabriele and Perry, whom she accuses of being tools of the American Right.  The editors say they pulled it because the author refused to accept “four minor edits.”  The email exchange has not been published, but of course every self-declared medievalist on Twitter is taking sides.  The debate is getting messy, with some defenders of the LARB apparently accused Dr. Rambaran-Olm (who is Anglo-Caribbean) of lying about her race.

It’s interesting that the brouhaha isn’t actually about the book (which is bad) or even the review (which is worse).  It’s about identity politics, and how hard it is for an academic—one who happens to be black—to get her lousy review of a lousy book published in a lousy magazine.

---

Happily, you can still read Dr. Rambaran-Olm’s review, which she posted on Medium.  It’s called “Sounds About White”, which should tell you everything you need to know.  But here’s Dr. Rambaran-Olm’s thesis statement just in case:

The core theme that runs through The Bright Ages is a Christocentric (that which is focused on Jesus and Christian narratives) one that recycles the usual stories of emperors, bishops, kings, military leaders.  Gabriele and Perry try to retell narratives about these convention [sic.] figures by discussing outside influence and “otherness” that played into these central figures’ successes and failures.

This may come as a bit of a surprise to Dr. Rambaran-Olm, but there we quite a few bishops and kings in the Middle Ages.  Granted, there was only a couple dozen bishops per country, and just one king.  As for “military leaders,” she probably means the nobility.  Noblemen were also a definite minority of the population.  Yet these two institutions—the Church and the State—wielded quite a lot of power.  Nearly all of it, as a matter of fact. 

One would think this would be obvious to a professional historian like Dr. Rambaran-Olm.  But, then, I would have thought it was obvious to Perry and Gabriele that there were white people in medieval Europe.  I’m not a professional historian—only a dabbler.  I like nothing more than to stretch out on the couch with a cup of tea and a little something by John Julius Norwich.  Yet here are three observations I’ve gleamed from my unguided studies.

First: that the overwhelming majority of people living in Europe circa the Middle Ages were white.  It’s generally believed that white people are indigenous to the region.  Second: most countries in medieval Europe were ruled by a mixed system of monarchy and aristocracy.  Republics were not unheard of, but they were exceedingly rare.  Third: a huge majority of the population was Christian. 

If we’re going to discuss a history of medieval Europe, it’s very important to keep those facts in mind.  

Of course, you don’t have to like them.  You can say that whites are a supermajority because [racism], or that monarchies are the norm because [oppression], or that Christianity is dominant because [theocracy].   And there would be some truth in that.  But it doesn’t change the fact that these are facts. 

The Middle Ages were an historical event.  They’ve already come and gone.  They can’t be other than what they were. 

To write a history of Medieval Europe, but without mentioning bishops and kings and white people, would be impossible. It would also be pointless.  It would be like writing a history of Germany between 1934 and 1945, but without mentioning Hitler.  First of all, you can’t.  But even if you could, why would you want to?  What interest could that era possibly hold?  The villains are all Nazis;  the heroes are all anti-Nazis.  It has to be “Nazi-centric.”  It can’t be anything else.

Now, you may think the medieval Church is the villain of medieval history.  And let’s say you’re right, just for the sake of argument.  Even so, how can a history of the Middle Ages not be “Christo-centric”?  It may be the story of a small, non-Christian minority struggling valiantly against the tyranny of Throne and Altar.  But whether they’re heroes or villains, Throne and Altar have to be main characters.

---

But Dr. Rambaran-Olm isn’t quite done yet. Later in her review, she writes:

In another place, the Abrahamic religions are described as “Asian” while Christ himself is described as a “Jewish refugee from the eastern Mediterranean who once crossed into Africa, who had now come to this island where He sat comfortably” (p. 74).  While it is true that Western religions have origins outside of Europe, descriptions like this try to de-Christianize Christianity, making it seem “hip,” international and inclusive, while erasing its present role in western imperialism.

In other words, Gabriele and Perry point out that Christianity is ultimately an “Eastern” religion, and they’re right… but that fact is inconvenient to my political agenda, so they shouldn’t have brought it up.

It’s unbelievably sad when historians feel guilty for having any warm feelings about their chosen field.  But this is how the modern academy operates.  You can’t even mention facts like “Jesus was born in Asia” without adding a lengthy disclaimer about how Jefferson Davis was a devout Episcopalian.  

Modern historians don’t study history. They hide from it.  They suffer from a collective case of nostophobia: a debilitating fear of the past. They live in constant horror of dead white men. What a sorry fate.

As I was writing this post, the latest edition of Ed West’s newsletter “Wrong Side of History” arrived in my inbox. Mr. West is also reviewing Dr. Rambaran-Olm’s review. (Maybe he also read about it in Micah Mattix’s “Prufrock” newsletter.) As always, he says it better than I could:

If you are the sort of person who craves power over others, then there is huge satisfaction in subverting a field of history for ideological reasons. There’s a thrill in having absurd claims taken seriously, in forcing people to repeat things which are clearly not true, because they’re scared to contradict you. In this, it is quite similar to the attraction of the transgender movement for a minority of men. 

Quite right. Bear in mind, too, that wielding that kind of power makes men miserable. These historians have set fire to their own field. It’s a power move, but not a smart one. As C. S. Lewis said, we go to Hell saying, “I now see that I spent most of my life in doing neither what I ought nor what I liked.” 

In desperation, Russia’s impaired and unhinged leader Vladimir Putin now talks trash about the likelihood of nuclear war.

A 79-year-old Joe Biden bellows back that his war-losing nuclear adversary is a murderer, a war criminal, and a butcher who should be removed from power.

Imagine the Unimaginable

By: Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

May 12, 2022

Americans are now entering uncharted, revolutionary territory. They may witness things over the next five months that once would have seemed unimaginable.

Until the Ukrainian conflict, we had never witnessed a major land war inside Europe directly involving a nuclear power.

In desperation, Russia’s impaired and unhinged leader Vladimir Putin now talks trash about the likelihood of nuclear war.

A 79-year-old Joe Biden bellows back that his war-losing nuclear adversary is a murderer, a war criminal, and a butcher who should be removed from power.

After a year of politicizing the U.S. military and its self-induced catastrophe in Afghanistan, America has lost deterrence abroad. China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia are conniving on how best to exploit this rare window of global military opportunity.

The traditional bedrocks of the American system—a stable economy, energy independence, vast surpluses of food, hallowed universities, a professional judiciary, law enforcement, and a credible criminal justice system—are dissolving.

Gas and diesel prices are hitting historic levels. Inflation is at a 40-year high. New cars and homes are unaffordable. The necessary remedy of high interest and tight money will be almost as bad as the disease of hyperinflation.

There is no southern border.

Expect over 1 million foreign nationals to swarm this summer into the United States without audit, COVID testing, or vaccination. None will have any worry of consequences for breaking U.S. immigration law.

Police are underfunded and increasingly defunded. District attorneys deliberately release violent criminals without charges. (Literally, 10,000 people witnessed a deranged man with a knife attack comedian Dave Chappelle on stage at the Hollywood Bowl last week, and the Los Angeles County D.A. refused to press felony charges.) Murder and assault are spiraling. Carjacking and smash-and-grab thefts are now normal big-city events.

Crime is now mostly a political matter. Ideology, race, and politics determine whether the law is even applied.

Supermarket shelves are thinning, and meats are now beyond the budgets of millions of Americans. An American president—in a first—casually warns of food shortages. Baby formula has disappeared from many shelves.

Politics resembles the violent last days of the Roman Republic. An illegal leak of a possible impending Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade that would allow state voters to set their own abortion laws has created a national hysteria.

Never has a White House tacitly approved mobs of protesters showing up at Supreme Court justices’ homes to rant and bully them into altering their votes.

There is no free speech anymore on campuses.

Merit is disappearing. Admissions, hiring, promotion, retention, grading, and advancement are predicated increasingly on mouthing the right orthodoxies or belonging to the proper racial, gender, or ethnic category.

When the new campus commissariat finally finishes absorbing the last redoubts in science, math, engineering, medical, and professional schools, America will slide into permanent mediocrity and irreversible declining standards of living.

What happened?

Remember all these catastrophes are self-induced. They are choices, not fate. The United States has the largest combined gas, coal, and oil deposits in the world. It possesses the know-how to build the safest pipelines and ensure the cleanest energy development on the planet.

Inflation was a deliberate Biden choice. He kept printing trillions of dollars for short-term political advantage, incentivizing labor nonparticipation, and keeping interest rates at historical lows—at a time of pent-up global demand.

The administration wanted no border. Only that way can politicized, impoverished immigrants repay left-wing undermining of the entire legal immigration system with their fealty at the ballot box.

Once esoteric, crack-pot academic theories—“modern monetary theory,” critical legal theory, critical race theory—now dominate policymaking in the Biden Administration.

The common denominator in all of this is ideology overruling empiricism, common sense, and pragmatism. Ruling elites would rather be politically correct failures and unpopular than politically incorrect, successful, and popular.

Is not that the tired story of left-wing revolutionaries from 18th-century France to early 20th-century Russia to the contemporary disasters in Cuba and Venezuela?

The American people reject the calamitous policies of 2021-2022. Yet the radical cadres surrounding a cognitively inert Joe Biden still push them through by executive orders, bureaucratic directives, and deliberate cabinet nonperformance.

Why? The Left has no confidence either in constitutional government or common sense.

So as the public pushes back, expect at the ground level more doxxing, cancel culture, de-platforming, ministries of disinformation, swarming the private homes of officials they target for bullying, and likely violent demonstrations in our streets this summer.

Meanwhile, left-wing elites will do their best to ignore Supreme Court decisions, illegally cancel student debts, and likely by the fall issue more COVID lockdowns. They will still dream of packing the Court, ending the filibuster, scrapping the Electoral College, adding more states, and flooding the November balloting with hundreds of millions more dollars of dark money from Silicon Valley.

When revolutionaries undermine the system, earn the antipathy of the people, and face looming disaster at the polls, it is then they prove most dangerous—as we shall see over the next few months.

___________________________________________________

Join the Dinesh D’Souza community and access his film ‘2000 Mules’

LOCALS.COM — This is Dinesh totally uncensored, unfiltered, and unchained. Become a part of the movement. Join the inner circle to get exclusive content and live Q&A!… (more)

Latest exclusive trailer released for ‘2000 Mules’ shows how the 2020 election was rigged and stolen [VIDEO] (Gateway Pundit)

See, in addition, the trailer of David Bossie’s ‘Rigged: The Zuckerberg-funded plot to defeat Donald Trump’ [VIDEO] (Citizens United)

View full ‘2000 Mules’ documentary FREE at BitChute [VIDEO] (bitchute.com)

View full ‘2000 Mules’ documentary FREE at Telegram [VIDEO] (Telegram)

---

MAY 13, 2022

2000 Mules and the Big Truth

SEAN FITZPATRICK

I’m not really one for conspiracy theories, and that’s why I was captivated by Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules, a documentary that shows with transparency the disturbing nature and extent of highly suspicious irregularities that took place around special pandemic ballot drop boxes during the 2020 election. The film makes President Trump a prognosticator when he said, “if you count the legal votes, I easily win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us.” 

Even with the jaw-dropping evidence D’Souza presents in 2000 Mules, and the conservative applause it is receiving, it is disheartening to anticipate that nothing will come of this remarkable investigative reporting. The profound complacency and cowardice of the Right is almost to be expected, but it is never too late to level the censure that election law violations deserve. Especially since they are corroding our democratic republic together with any adherence to the truth that remains in our process of selecting government representation and leadership.

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

2000 Mules presents the findings of a Texas nonprofit organization called True the Vote, who used the location ping systems that cell phones generate—which are commonly used by apps, cell providers, and law enforcement—to observe and analyze the activity around ballot drop boxes in key counties of five swing states that determined the course of the 2020 election. (Many of these boxes were purchased with $400 million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg through the left-wing Center for Tech and Civic Life, by the way.) 

Their discoveries are shocking, showing in practically undeniable fashion that at least 2,000 people in these swing states made visits to multiple drop boxes, mostly in the dead of night and wearing surgical gloves, to deposit multiple ballots. Security camera footage was coupled to the signals recorded by the geo-location records and shows these individuals in the act and then taking a picture of the drop box before heading to the next box.

There is no conceivable reason, save a nefarious one, that would prompt such unaccountable (and in some cases blatantly illegal) actions, which, if they are what they seem to be, interfere with voting laws and the voting process. D’Souza shows how the team at True the Vote collected and combed through the data surrounding these individuals—or “mules,” the term given to operatives who traffic illegally-acquired ballots—who visited more than ten drop boxes and five nonprofit organizations that collect ballots, using geo-fencing and geo-tracking, and assigning a moderate average of ballots deposited. 

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

The results of their equations are sufficient to reverse the electoral margins between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. And that is the conclusion that pertains only to the 2,000 people who met these criteria in those selected areas, which is to say that there may well be more in other locations or who did not visit as many drop boxes but who contributed in what has every appearance of being a widespread, coordinated attack on the election. 

There are some who dismiss 2000 Mules and its use of cell phone location technology, but it is very difficult to regard it as anything short of proof that something was very awry about the vote count in these swing states. And further, that it is almost a matter of certainty that the election was stolen. D’Souza provides clear and objective evidence of organized criminal action surrounding the harvesting of ballots and an explanation for the bizarre reversal that Americans witnessed on the morning after election day—when most went to bed with Trump firmly in the lead and woke up to find Biden suddenly in the lead. The media crowed that there had never been such a comeback in history. But many found it implausible if not impossible. Even as CNN and NPR pounded away with assertions that there was definitely nothing shady going on, many felt something was definitely wrong.

Let us not beat a dead horse—because the horse should not be pronounced dead. The outrage of the 2020 election shouldn’t be abandoned as “old news” or a “lost cause.” Conservatives and Catholics should not forget that it is unbelievable that doddering Joe Biden, with his Covid-shuttered campaign and limp base, won more of the popular vote than the “messianic” Barack Obama did in 2008. Though the January 6 protests did not help the cause, lambasted as it still is as the damning stain of the cause, the outrage must not succumb to desires to disassociate or rooftop condemnations. And 2000 Mules delivers the evidence the Right has been waiting for after court dismissals and legal fizzlings, confirming with both journalistic integrity and clarity the misgivings held by so many.

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

But what will the result of Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote’s expositions be? In a nation that has lost its relation to truth, it is frustrating to expect the continued capitulation by conservatives, and Catholics, to lies. There is a spinelessness that has crept into the American character and the Catholic soul, something that is the result of the social mantra that good fences make good neighbors in a PC Marxist melting pot that is rife with the propagandist pressures of relativism.

But the Right’s conservatism shouldn’t prevent rebellion or revolution. Any fears that caution against destabilizing our democracy may destabilize our freedom. And it is certainly the case that the Left has absolutely no scruples about destabilizing democracy for its own ends. President Trump’s term was plagued by an incredible barrage of noise, wild accusations, outrageous investigations, and wasted tax-payer dollars on so-called suspicions of election interference and collusion with Russia. That happened.

But when it came to the suspicions and reports from the Right concerning voter fraud and breakdowns in election integrity, with the “shenanigans” that were observed at polls and surrounded unconstitutional Covid-19 modifications regarding mail-in ballots and drop boxes, the whole thing was quickly dubbed the “Big Lie.” It became an obvious matter of policy for the mainstream media, whenever referring to the 2020 election, to say that it was free and fair and that Donald Trump and his supporters were lying when they said the election was rigged.

ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW

So, again, what will be done with D’Souza’s documentary? Though it is receiving attention and acclaim by conservatives, there are already clear efforts to stifle it. It is tempting to chock up to coincidence the leak of the Supreme Court majority draft that would overturn Roe v. Wade immediately before the release of 2000 Mules, but the game of politics—especially in banana republics—has everything to do with seizing the spotlight through event orchestration in subtle sleights of hand that control the message of the day. Even Fox News censored reference to 2000 Mules, ostensibly to avoid bias and plunging against the assigned and largely accepted narrative. Where is the conservative courage against the audacious Left?

Irish poet William Butler Yeats wrote in “The Second Coming,”

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Not that Republicans are the best, so to speak, but Catholics should recognize that the conservative Right is closer to the truth than the liberal Left. But why is it that the affinity and attraction to truth does not encourage and inspire conviction and confidence to act authoritatively and decisively? Or at least with as much passionate intensity as we typically see on the Left? This is precisely the crisis that Catholics must respond to on the front lines because the GOP won’t; and if there is anything that we must live and die for, it is the truth, and that with every conviction of the Faith.

There was something not so subtle and almost certainly devious at work to overthrow President Trump; and 2000 Mules makes that point and makes that case loud and clear.

While there’s something deeply distressing about how all of this is playing out before our eyes, there’s something even more distressing in the bravado on the Left. But to many liberals, the ends justify the means: Even if what happened—and what may happen again—is acknowledged as cheating, anything is acceptable to keep a racist fascist out of the White House. End of story.

But we must not let it be the end of the story. 2000 Mules is a call to renew our resistance to what is truly the Big Lie—that Joe Biden won the election fairly and that there is no evidence of voter fraud. Conservatives and Catholics must fight on and fight with a will. At the same time, we mustn’t mind overly much about losing certain earthly battles because our war is already won, and we do not put our trust in princes. 

Defending the Faith includes defending the truth. And when a work of truth is released to repudiate lies in the name of the dignity of human freedom, it is the duty of Catholics to support it with vigor and the determined hope that we might earn the grace to preserve the Kingdom of God on earth for the sake of the salvation of souls. Nothing less is at stake in our political purposes, regardless of church and state separation; but without the truth, it is a purpose that will be thwarted with eternal consequences.

https://www.facebook.com/v2.10/plugins/like.php?action=like&app_id=485814248461205&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df3c066d38e7eade%26domain%3Dwww.crisismagazine.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.crisismagazine.com%252Ff1a712ef40e39a4%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=660&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.crisismagazine.com%2F2022%2F2000-mules-and-the-big-truth&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&share=false&show_faces=false

By Sean Fitzpatrick

Sean Fitzpatrick is a senior contributor to Crisis and serves on the faculty of Gregory the Great Academy, a Catholic boarding school for boys in Pennsylvania.

Biden’s Pro-Abortion Catholic Cabinet May 13, 2022 Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on President Biden’s Catholic Cabinet members: We can tell a lot about a president just by knowing something about his Cabinet picks. This takes on special significance for Catholics when we have a Catholic president. To begin with, we would expect a Catholic president to be faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church, especially on life and death matters. We would also expect that any Catholics who are chosen to be in his Cabinet would also be loyal sons and daughters of the Church. Biden fails these tests. He is the most ardent defender of abortion rights ever to become president of the United States. That obviously means that his policies are in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Catholic Church. For the most part, his Catholic Cabinet picks also reflect badly on him. He has eight Catholics in his Cabinet. Lloyd Austin is Secretary of Defense. He has no public record on the subject of abortion. Denis McDonough is Secretary of Veterans Affairs. He has an uneven record on abortion, and while he is not a rabid defender of it, he has tilted toward the pro-abortion stance. The other six are all off-the-charts supporters of abortion rights. The Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, is one of the most extreme defenders of abortion-on-demand. He is loved by NARAL, the abortion giant, and has previously earned a zero rating from National Right to Life. He has no qualms about supporting partial-birth abortion, and his passion for abortion is so strong that it inspired him to attempt to close down crisis pregnancy centers in California when he was the state’s Attorney General. He is most known for seeking to punish the Little Sisters of the Poor by relentlessly seeking to force them to pay for abortion-inducing services in their healthcare plans. Jennifer Granholm is Secretary of Energy. When she was Governor of Michigan, she twice vetoed a partial-birth abortion ban and worked with other pro-abortion politicians to loosen abortion restrictions. Biden chose Samantha Power to head the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). When she was nominated, CHANGE, an international abortion lobby group, congratulated her for her pro-abortion work. Power has not been shy about her dedication to abortion rights. Gina Raimondo is Secretary of Commerce. When she was Governor of Rhode Island, she championed a law that would allow partial-birth abortions. She also signed a bill that codified abortion protections. Tom Vilsack is Secretary of Agriculture. When he was Governor of Iowa, he vetoed legislation that would have required abortion facilities to provide women with factual information about abortion risks and alternatives to aborting their child. He opposed consent laws that offered women contemplating an abortion with pictures of fetal development. The Secretary of Labor is Marty Walsh. When he was Mayor of Boston, he supported abortion-on-demand and taxpayer-funded abortions. NARAL commended him when he sought to crush crisis pregnancy centers. These are the Catholics who serve in Biden’s Cabinet. Most of them work to reinforce each other’s animus against the Church’s pro-life heritage. Indeed, given the responsibilities that some of them have, they are currently working to ensure that their deadly ideas are infused in their policy decisions. It looks like Biden decided to double down in his support for abortion by choosing Catholics who would support him in this endeavor. He may fool some by walking around with a rosary in his pocket, but more savvy Americans—not just Catholics—are able to distinguish between posturing and fidelity to one’s religious tenets. That’s a test he cannot pass. Today is White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki’s last day on the job—she is going to work for MSNBC, which should be a smooth transition. Contact: jennifer.r.psaki@who.eop.gov

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Francis Bishops Assumptions & the Sex-Abuse Nietzschean Worldview vs. The Catholic Worldview 

May 10, 2022

Pope Francis says seeing a psychiatrist helped himIs Pope Francis Denying Sin when he says Child MolestersPope reveals he had weekly psychoanalysis sessions

Max Weber and Sigmund Freud are the two writers most responsible for Nietzschean language in America. Few know that Freud was ” profoundly influenced by Nietzsche,” according to Bloom. Freud, much more than Weber, profoundly changed America from a Christian culture to a therapeutic or self-centered culture. 

The therapeutic approaches, which started with Freud, have a basic assumption that is not Christian. The starting point is not the Catholic worldview, which is summed up in the parable of the prodigal son: a fallen and sinful world with persons needing God the Father to forgive them so they can return to be His sons and daughters. 

Unlike the Christian worldview, the therapeutic starting point is that the individual must overcome personal unconscious forces, in Freud, and in Carl Jung the person must unite to the collective unconscious, which is shared by all humans. 

In both cases, the therapist assists his client to change himself to ‘become his real self.’ Forgiveness and returning to God are not needed. What is needed are not God and His Forgiveness, but a therapist assisting a self to reach the fullness of its self…

… The failure of these Francis Catholic bishops is a failure to teach the faith and moral teachings of Jesus Christ. Getting rid of a few priests will not solve the problem if these basic assumptions stay, because more – only cleverer – sex abusers will rise up to take their place. 

I feel sorry for these Francis bishops and other Church leaders if they don’t take a look at themselves and repent of these basic assumptions in their dioceses. They must eventually come face to face with the Living God. He is the Father of these little ones who have been scandalized and abused. – The Catholic Monitor 

Fr. VF said…

Meanwhile, a million Americans have been murdered in hospitals. (The murdered are 95% of those labelled “covid deaths.”) Another million have been murdered by the bio-weapon injections. Every bishop knows that, if he utters a word about these murders, he will suffer the fate of Bishop Torres. Every bishop knows that the ongoing genocide has the full support of “the Holy Father.”- The Catholic Monitor [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2022/05/might-franciss-adulterous-persons.html]

Professor Allan Bloom, a philosopher who wrote “The Closing of the American Mind,” thought that Friedrich Nietzsche was the father of modern America. He said, “Words such as ‘charisma,’ ‘lifestyle,’ ‘commitment,’ ‘identity,’ and many others, all of which can easily be traced to Nietzsche … are now practically American slang.” 

But the most important Nietzschean slang word is “values.”

“Values” are the death of Christian morality because values simply mean opinions. If opinion is how things are decided, then might makes right. 

One must remember that whenever someone talks about values in modern America – family values or religious values or place-the-blank-in-front-of values – they are saying there is no real or objective right or wrong – only opinions of the self and its will to power. 

Nietzsche’s philosophy is summed up by Bloom as 

Commitment values the values and makes them valuable. Not love of truth but intellectual honesty characterizes the proper state of mind. Since there is no truth in the values, and what truth there is about life is not lovable, the hallmark of the authentic will is consulting one’s oracle while facing up to what one is and what one experiences. Decisions, not, deliberations, are the movers of deeds. One cannot know or plan the future. One must will it. 
As a philologist, Nietzsche believed there was no original text and transferred this belief to reality, which he thought was only pure chaos. He proposed will to power in which one imposes or “posits” one’s values on a meaningless world. 
Previous to Freud’s psychoanalysis, Nietzsche’s writings spoke of the unconscious and destructive side of the self. In fact, Freud wrote that Nietzsche “had a more penetrating knowledge of himself than any other man who ever lived or was likely to live.” 

Max Weber and Sigmund Freud are the two writers most responsible for Nietzschean language in America. Few know that Freud was ” profoundly influenced by Nietzsche,” according to Bloom. Freud, much more than Weber, profoundly changed America from a Christian culture to a therapeutic or self-centered culture. 

The therapeutic approaches, which started with Freud, have a basic assumption that is not Christian. The starting point is not the Catholic worldview, which is summed up in the parable of the prodigal son: a fallen and sinful world with persons needing God the Father to forgive them so they can return to be His sons and daughters. 

Unlike the Christian worldview, the therapeutic starting point is that the individual must overcome personal unconscious forces, in Freud, and in Carl Jung the person must unite to the collective unconscious, which is shared by all humans. 

In both cases, the therapist assists his client to change himself to ‘become his real self.’ Forgiveness and returning to God are not needed. What is needed are not God and His Forgiveness, but a therapist assisting a self to reach the fullness of its self. 

Freud, under the influence of Nietzsche, moved psychiatry away from the mechanistic and biological to the previously “unscientific” model of the “symbolic language of the unconscious.” 

Freud’s pupil Carl Jung took the symbolic language of the unconscious a step further. Unlike his mentor, Jung’s unconscious theory is not just about making conscious sexually repressed or forgotten memories. His symbolic therapy used what he called the “active imagination” to incorporate split-off parts of the unconscious (complexes) into the conscious mind. 

He believed with Freud that dreams and symbols are means to the unconscious, but for Jung the dream and symbol are not repressed lusts from stages of development. They are a way to unite with the collective unconsciousness. 

Many Christians thought this “language of the soul” was a step forward from what they considered the cramped scientific reality of modernity. What they didn’t understand was that Jung’s theory was part of a movement that led to the rejection of objective morality and truth. 

Jungian (and Freudian) psychoanalysis reduces Christian concepts such as God, free will and intelligence to blind reactions, unconscious urges and uncontrollable acts. Even more disastrous, Jung inverted Christian worship. 

Leanne Payne, a Christian therapist, considers Jung “not a scientist, but a post-modernist subjectivist. Jung’s active imagination therapy is hostile not only to the Judeo-Christian worldview, but to all systems containing objective moral and spiritual value. Within this world the unconscious urge becomes god. What the unconscious urge wants is what is finally right or moral. These psychic personae [complexes] are literally called ‘gods’ (archetypes),’ and so an overt idolatry of self follows quickly.” 

Within the modern French Nietzschean schools of thought, a type of Jungian unconscious urge is replacing the old existential conscious self who chooses. The post-modernist is moving from the idolatry of self to the idolatry of autonomous inner “beings” that, according to Payne, are similar to pagan “gods.” 

As C.S. Lewis predicted in “The Screwtape Letters,” we are moving to a “scientific” paganism. C.S. Lewis’ name for the “scientific” pagan was the Materialist Magician and the name of the autonomous inner “beings” was the “Forces.” 

In “The Screwtape Letters,” his character who is a senior evil spirit said: 

I have high hopes that we shall learn in due time how to emotionalise and mythologise their science to such an extent that what is, in effect, belief in us (though not under that name) will creep in while the human mind remains closed to the Enemy [God]. The “Life Force,” the worship of sex, and some aspects of Psychoanalysis may here prove useful. If once we can produce our prefect work – the Materialist Magician, the man, not using, but veritably worshipping, what he vaguely calls “Forces” while denying the existence of “spirits” – then the end of the war will be in sight. 

Some of the largest audiences for this “scientific” paganism with its inversion of worship and the Judeo-Christian worldview are followers of Christ. By using Christian symbols and terminology, Jungian spirituality has infiltrated to a large extent Christian publishers, seminaries, even convents and monasteries. 
Many Christians are using Jung’s active imagination as a method of prayer. Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., thinks this is dangerous “because this fantasy life has no moral underpinnings, because it helps to reinforce an experience of autonomous inner ‘beings’ accessible via the imagination, and because it is a defense against redemptive suffering, it easily allies with and quickly becomes a Gnostic form of spiritually with powerfully occult overtones.” 

If one is under the influence of the autonomous inner “beings,” uncontrollable urges can overpower the self. One can go temporarily or permanently insane. And in the Christian worldview, the autonomous inner “being” is not always just an imaginary being, but can be a personal being, which then makes possession a rare, but not impossible, occurrence. 

In fact, according to one Jungian therapist, Nietzsche himself went insane permanently when an autonomous inner “being” (archetype) overpowered him. So, unfortunately with the widespread acceptance of Jungian spirituality, mainstream Christianity seems to be moving to post-modern Nietzschean insanity and possibly, in some cases, possession. 

Jung’s autobiography is full of insane or occult experiences. He was continually hearing ‘voices.’ In his autobiography he said his home was “… crammed full of spirits … they were packed deep right up to the front door and the air was so thick it was scarcely possible to breathe.” 

During the Hitler regime, which itself was obsessed with the occult, Jung edited a Nazi psychotherapeutic journal where he said, “The ‘Aryan’ unconscious has a higher potential than the Jewish.” Keep that word “potential” in your mind. It will be used by American psychology. 

Once opinion is master, then might makes right. In “Beyond Good and Evil,” Nietzsche proclaimed a new morality, “Master morality,” which was different from Christian morality – or “slave morality,” as he called it. He thought the weak have the morality of obedience and conformity to the master. Masters have a right to do whatever they want; since there is no God, everything is permissible. 

In what Nietzsche considered his masterpiece, “Zarathustra,” he said the new masters would replace the dead God. The masters were to be called Supermen, or the superior men. 

After Freud and Jung came Alfred Adler, also a follower of Nietzsche, with “Individual psychology,” which maintains that the individual strives for what he called “superiority” but now is called “self-realization” or “self-actualization,” and which came from Nietzsche’s ideas of striving and self-creation. 

The “human potential movement” and humanistic psychology of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers are imbedded with these types of ideas. The psychologists of “potential” teach the superior man. 

Edvard Munch said: 

Alfred Adler translated Nietzsche’s philosophical idea of “will to power” into the psychological concept of self-actualization. Thus, Nietzschean thought forms the foundation for and permeates Alfred Adler’s Individual Psychology, Abraham Maslow’s Humanistic Biology, Carl Rogers’s Person-Centered Psychology, and has influenced many other psychological ideas and systems. … Alfred Adler was the first psychologist to borrow directly from Nietzsche, making numerous references to the philosopher throughout his works. Adler took Nietzsche’s idea of “will to power” and transformed it into the psychological concept of self-actualization, in which an individual strives to realize his potential. 
Mary Kearns, in an address to the Catholic Head Teachers Association of Scotland, spoke of the Nietzschean ideas now being taught in Catholic schools in the name of “scientific” psychology. Kearns said: 

The methods are based on “the group therapy technique” first developed in America in the 1970’s by two psychologists, Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. They described how emotional conditioning should be carried out by a group “facilitator”. The facilitator does not impart knowledge like the old fashioned teacher. Instead he/she initiates discussions encouraging children to reveal their personal views and feelings. The facilitator’s approach is “value free”. There is no right or wrong answer to any religious or moral question. Each person discloses what is right or wrong for them. All choices are equally valid even if they are opposites. Everything depends on feelings or emotions. Reason and conscience are discouraged. If anyone attempts objective evaluation, they are to be treated as an “outsider” and there will be a strong emotional reaction against such “judgemental intolerance”. 

If it is true that Catholic education now uses these techniques in “teaching religious and moral education,” then the Catholic education system has entered into the Nietzschean insanity. If these are the techniques being used in education and in the seminaries, then sexual misconduct charges against priests are a symptom of “scientific” paganism replacing Christianity. 

Santa Rosa priest Don Kimball, who is charged with sexual misconduct, is an example of someone whose “approach” was “value free” – that is, there was “no right or wrong answer to any religious or moral question.” 

In 1996, Karyn Wolfe and Mark Spaulding of Pacific Church News said, “THE WEDGE! You can’t do youth ministry (any ministry for that matter) without it. … Basing his theory on psychologist Abraham Maslow’s ‘Hierarchy of Needs’, the Rev. Don Kimball developed this model for the growth and maturity process of a group.” 

Another example of the value-free approach is Thomas Zanzig, a major leader in the Catholic Church for youth ministry, plus an editor and writer of Catholic textbooks. 

According to Marks S. Winward, Zanzig, in a book on youth ministry, “bases his ‘Wedge Model’ on a similar model developed by Fr. Don Kimble.” Homeschool leader Marianna Bartold said, “Sharing the Christian Message by Thomas Zanzig has students come up with as many slang or street words as possible for penis and vagina in three or four minutes.” 

Now, many might say these are only isolated cases of misuses of Maslow and Adler until one reads the original text. According to William Coulson, a former collaborator of Carl Rogers, 

Maslow was always a revolutionary. … In 1965, working a radical idea about children and adult sex into his book about management, “In Eupsychian Management: A Journal,” [Maslow said]: “I remember talking with Alfred Adler about this in a kind of joking way, but then we both got quite serious about it, and Adler thought that this sexual therapy at various ages was certainly a very fine thing. As we both played with the thought, we envisioned a kind of social worker … as a psychotherapist in giving therapy literally on the couch.” 

As one can see, the basic therapeutic assumption leads to certain results in the real world. These thinkers don’t believe in the basic Christian assumption that there is a need for forgiveness from God. Instead, they believe there is no sin, only selves needing to reach the fullness of themselves. 

It is understandable that atheists such as Nietzsche, Maslow and Adler could hold these basic assumptions, but that Christians and priests hold these assumptions is a disgrace. The denial of original sin and personal sin is, in large part, behind the headlines of the sex-abuse catastrophe and other dioceses. 

The failure of these Francis Catholic bishops is a failure to teach the faith and moral teachings of Jesus Christ. Getting rid of a few priests will not solve the problem if these basic assumptions stay, because more – only cleverer – sex abusers will rise up to take their place. 

I feel sorry for these Francis bishops and other Church leaders if they don’t take a look at themselves and repent of these basic assumptions in their dioceses. They must eventually come face to face with the Living God. He is the Father of these little ones who have been scandalized and abused.

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1] 

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.