ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT MAKES RIOTS, CONSPIRACIES GOOD OR BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What Makes Riots, Conspiracies,

Cabals, and Insurrections

โ€˜Goodโ€™ or โ€˜Badโ€™?

Shut up and keep quiet; 

that is all ye need to know.

By Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

January 9, 2022

โ€œIndeed, men too often take upon themselves in the prosecution of their revenge to set the example of doing away with those general laws to which alike can look for salvation in adversity, instead of allowing them to subsist against the day of danger when their aid may be required.โ€

โ€”Thucydides, on the stasis at Corcyra

 If the Republicans take the House or perhaps even the Senate, what new norms will they inherit from the Democratic majority of 2019-2021? 

Will Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on national television ritually tear up the text of Joe Bidenโ€™s State of the Union Address and grimace while he speaks? Was that Speaker Pelosiโ€™s (D-Calif.) intended vision of her new โ€œnarrativeโ€ for the 21st-century Congress?

Will the new majority, calling back to 2018, almost immediately begin impeaching an unpopular Biden? And will Republicans likewise dispense with a special counselโ€™s report, or with formal hearings with an array of witnesses with spirited cross-examinations? 

Will they establish a special committee to investigate the rioting of summer 2020? Perhaps, in the new cannibalistic spirit of the age, will they dig into which national political figuresโ€”or colleaguesโ€”communicated with the Antifa or Black Lives Matter riot leaders, or offered them bail?

Will Speaker McCarthy veto Democratic committee members and instead appoint his own Democratsโ€”on three criteria: one, that they have previously voted to impeach Biden; two, that either they cannot realistically again run for, or cannot conceivably be reelected to, the House; and three, that in advance they publicly praise and agree with McCarthy on the unwarranted virulence of the 2020 riots?

Will Republicans claim as reason to impeach Joe Biden that he failed to execute the laws as he swore to, by nullifying U.S immigration law? Was he not also guilty of an โ€œabuse of powerโ€ and โ€œobstructing Congress,โ€ as he allowed 2 million aliens unlawfully to cross the southern border, during a pandemic without either testing or vaccinations, helping to spread the disease with reckless disregard? Will the new Congress subpoena generals to investigate the surrender and flight from Afghanistan, and especially who ordered it and why?

Would the Republicans follow the new norms and thus impeach a once-impeached and acquitted Biden a second time as he leaves office, and have the Senate try Biden in 2025 as a private citizenโ€”again with neither a special counsel nor formal reportโ€”nor with the chief justice presiding over the trial, as the Constitution demands?

Will they appoint a special counsel to appoint a dream team of conservative lawyers? And would they allot a budget of $40 million and a lifespan of 22 months to get to the bottom of the Biden family pay-for-play syndicate, as federal investigators try to square Biden family expenditures and lifestyles with reported incomes? 

Would such a counsel subpoena all the records of the Biden family, especially those concerning the financial labyrinth of Hunter Biden, to determine whether the Bidens registered as lobbyists for foreign governments, declared to the IRS their entire incomes, told the truth while under oath, or contacted public officials to influence U.S. foreign policy?

As far as โ€œdomestic terroristsโ€โ€”who, according to Vice President Kamala Harris, rival the Imperial Japanese Navyโ€™s killing of 2,400 Americans at Pearl Harbor or Bin Ladenโ€™s 9/11 hit team that murdered 3,000 civiliansโ€”should a bipartisan Warren Commission of distinguished citizens, without politicians of either party, be convened and entrusted to look at both the January 6 and summer 2020 riots? 

The goal would be complete transparency: the FBI would turn over all records concerning the use of informants in both riots. Former Attorney General Merrick Garland would be called in to detail what the FBI did and did not doโ€”as the investigation also queried the agencyโ€™s other efforts monitoring parents at school board meetings or serving as the Biden family clean-up and retrieval service. 

All communications during days of riot between law enforcement and politicians, and within law enforcement, likewise would enter the public domain. 

The violent deaths of Ashli Babbitt and more than 30 victims of the 2020 riots would be fully reinvestigated: who were the parties responsible for their deaths? Were they arrested, indicted, convicted, and incarceratedโ€”or exempted? Would there be dozens of indictments, in Kyle Rittenhouse fashion?

Which social media platforms were used during both the 2020 and January 6 riots, if any, to coordinate violent activity? Did public officials or candidates contribute to the violence by encouraging exemptions, or offering to bail out offenders? 

Did demonstrators in the violent weeks before the election and in the street modulate their high profiles and calibrate violence on the prompt of โ€œpowerful peopleโ€ in politics and the media, as seemingly suggested in a recent Time magazine braggadocious article (e.g., โ€œThere was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.โ€ [emphases added])

 โ€œGoodโ€ and โ€œBadโ€ Riots?

 โ€œNow too many see the protests as the problem. No, the problem is what forced your fellow citizens to take to the streets: persistent, poisonous inequities and injustice . . . And please, show me where it says protesters are supposed to be polite and peaceful. Because I can show you that outraged citizens are what made the country what she is and led to any major milestone. To be honest, this is not a tranquil time.โ€ 

โ€”CNN anchorman Chris Cuomo

What if there had been a quite different national reaction following the shooting of military veteran Ashli Babbitt, the petite woman who was killed by an unnamed law-enforcement officer while unarmed and committing the crime of unlawfully entering the U.S. Capitol? 

What if from January to May 2021, 120 days of looting, arson, and violence had followed the killing of the unarmed Babbitt by a policeman whose identity federal police would not divulge? As a result, what if right-wing thugs and criminals for four months in late spring and summer of 2021 had engaged in rioting, arson, and looting that resulted in over 30 deaths and $2 billion in property damage, flame-seared police precincts, and torched federal courthouses, and caused 2,000 police injuries? 

What if red state governors gave the rioters and protestors a pass to violate quarantines, given the outrageous killing of an unarmed woman? What if national figures such as a Republican vice-presidential candidate bragged of contributing to bail funds for any rioters and looters and arsonists who were arrested? 

Yet what if most of those hypothetical right-wingers in 2021 reacting to the Babbitt killing and responsible for trying to burn down government buildings were either not arrested, or subsequently released after being arrested, or had their charges dropped? And imagine if such exemptions accorded to right-wing thugs and miscreants stood in contrast to the hundreds of summer 2020 rioters still sitting in jailโ€”often in solitary confinement, without recourse to bailโ€”and watched by abusive right-wing deplorable guards?

What would be the reaction if local law enforcement were ordered by red state mayors not to stop such post-January 6 violence, as governors refused to call out their National Guards? What if the top retired military echelon in 2021 had libeled a Democratic president for even suggesting that federal troops were necessary to reestablish calm? What would happen if, for days on end, zany armed right-wingers carved out a swath of downtown Phoenix, declaring it their autonomous zone, and warned police not to dare enter their domain?

Beautiful Conspiracies, Lovely Cabals?

โ€œThere was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs . . . Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers, and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears . . . Thatโ€™s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreamโ€“a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.โ€ โ€”Molly Ball, Time

So left-wing Time journalist Molly Ball wrote in obvious admiration of the supposed real โ€œheroesโ€ of the 2020 election.

But what if in the next election, copycat, private citizen, right-wing billionaires likewise in โ€œsecretโ€ and through a โ€œshadow campaignโ€ pull off a successful โ€œconspiracyโ€?

What if in this new normal a โ€œwell-funded cabal of powerful peopleโ€ on the Right managed to โ€œinfluence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of informationโ€? What would the Left say of all that after their candidate lost the 2024 election?

What if right-wing journalist hacks bragged post facto that their successful effort was the epitome of a โ€œconspiracy,โ€ and โ€œwell-fundedโ€ cabalsโ€”given their noble efforts to modulate and calm down right-wing protests in the streets before the election, and get their allies in the media โ€œto control the flow of informationโ€? 

Would leftists allege that right-wing looters and arsonists obeyed commands from colluding right-wing billionaires and politicians to clean up their act, temporarily, given the bad pre-election media optics? Would that be racketeering across state lines or a conspiracy or an insurrection turned off and on? Would right-wing freelancers be praised for trying to warp the media and channel the โ€œflow of informationโ€? Perhaps, the noble conspiracy would succeed, with the aid of the media and FBI, to squash any embarrassing story about a Trump family diary or laptop?

What if Joe Biden was not just dealing with his self-created disasters that have dropped his polls below 40 percent, but also simultaneously with such a right-wing cabal suing in the courts, after failing to persuade purple-state legislative majorities to overturn existing voting laws? What would Biden do if dozens of right-wing funded lawsuits, adjudicated by right-wing Trump-appointed judges, began systematically altering purple-state balloting procedures passed by their legislatures?

What if suddenly and mysteriously in 2024 there were no longer 102 million early and mail-in voters, but a more typical 30-40 million voters casting ballots outside of Election Day? What if the abnormal and surreal 2020 ballot disqualification rate of 0.1 to 0.4 percent in many states, returned to a more normal two to four percent? 

Would any on the Left object if a single right-wing billionaire stealthily channeled $419 million into preselected swing-state red precincts, effectively to take over public oversight of the balloting? Would Hillary Clinton then again say the Republican winner was โ€œillegitimateโ€? Would celebrities once more appear in videos urging the electors not to honor their statesโ€™ voting tallies?

All Ye Need to Know

The point of these hypotheticals is that there is no point, no consistent theme, no constant principle concerning riots, conspiracies, cabals, and insurrectionsโ€”except one. 

There is only the left-wing desire through any means necessary to obtain, increase, and use power to alter the Constitution and our long-held traditions and customs of governance, especially when the majority in a constitutional republic opposes such efforts. The lesson then is that all means are justified to obtain morally superior endsโ€”with the caveat that only leftists can be morally superior.

As a result, sometimes โ€œdark moneyโ€ cabals and โ€œunfoldingโ€ conspiracies of โ€œpowerful people,โ€ who vow to rid the world of Trump, successfully can and should โ€œchange rules and lawsโ€ and again โ€œcontrol the flow of informationโ€ and modulate โ€œprotestsโ€ and coordinate private enterprise โ€œ resistance.โ€

But what of the supposedly clueless public? What of the non-powerful people, the clingers, the dregs, and the irredeemables, the smelly in Walmart, and the toothless who have no inkling of such a smug, hip โ€œshadow campaignโ€? What of those without Mark Zuckerbergโ€™s billions, or Silicon Valleyโ€™s control of โ€œthe flow of informationโ€ or vast sums of โ€œhundreds of millions in public and private fundingโ€?

They are left with only the surreality that sometimes elected legislatures passing laws to require a voter to present an ID is โ€œracistโ€ and โ€œvoter suppression,โ€ but at other times private โ€œcabalsโ€ and conspiracies of โ€œpowerful people,โ€ who outside of government and in secret, should certainly be โ€œchanging,โ€ โ€œsteering,โ€ and โ€œcontrollingโ€ voting procedures and the media coverage of such efforts. 

In their deplorable ignorance, they are to accept that sometimes 120-day big riots are admirably not โ€œtranquil,โ€but smaller one-day ones are terrorism and insurrection. Sometimes unarmed suspects, with a long record of meritorious military service, lethally shot by a policeman deserved it, as the law enforcement shooter becomes heroic and the victim demonized and slandered, as the killing is no indictment of policing.  But then again, sometimes unarmed suspects, with lengthy arrest records, who die while in police custody are deified, as the death contextualizes ensuing riots and mayhem. 

Sometimes renegade impeachments without rules are wonderful to behold; sometimes they would be hateful, vindictive, and destructive of American democracy. 

A cynic who knew nothing of politics, nothing of the contemporary American Left or Right,  might instead conclude in Orwellian fashion that big, lengthy deadly riots, are โ€œgood,โ€ smaller, shorter, less-lethal ones โ€œbadโ€;that bigger, more secret, and more successful cabals are good; but smaller, more open, and less successful ones would be bad. 

Also good is a Congress going to unprecedented lengths to destroy an effective president with a successful record. Bad is a Congress impotently attempting to block a failed president with a catastrophic record. 

And so shut up and keep quiet, since that is all ye need to know . . .

___________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT MAKES RIOTS, CONSPIRACIES GOOD OR BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ARCHBISHOP VIGANO SPEAKS!!!

22
Sanctissimi Nominis JESUvigano crestPublished inRemnant Articles

[Comment Guidelines – Click to view]back to top Last modified on Friday, January 14, 2022 Sharehttps://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.e37c957bd3ae00473b95800b99e19cff.en-gb.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en-gb&original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fremnantnewspaper.com%2Fweb%2Findex.php%2Farticles%2Fitem%2F5800-the-latin-mass-vigano-remembers-what-francis-wants-us-to-forget%2F&size=l&text=The%20Remnant%20Newspaper%20-%20THE%20LATIN%20MASS%3A%20Vigan%C3%B2%20Remembers%20What%20Francis%20Wants%20Us%20to%20Forget&time=1642445644485&type=share&url=https%3A%2F%2Fremnantnewspaper.com%2Fweb%2Findex.php%2Farticles%2Fitem%2F5800-the-latin-mass-vigano-remembers-what-francis-wants-us-to-forgethttps://www.facebook.com/v3.3/plugins/like.php?action=like&app_id=449478478466814&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df394066c83fbc1e%26domain%3Dremnantnewspaper.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fremnantnewspaper.com%252Ffca50322f88564%26relation%3Dparent.parent&color_scheme=light&container_width=0&href=https%3A%2F%2Fremnantnewspaper.com%2Fweb%2Findex.php%2Farticles%2Fitem%2F5800-the-latin-mass-vigano-remembers-what-francis-wants-us-to-forget&layout=button_count&locale=en_GB&sdk=joey&share=true&show_faces=true&size=largehttps://disqus.com/embed/comments/?base=default&f=remnantnewspaper&t_u=https%3A%2F%2Fremnantnewspaper.com%2Fweb%2Findex.php%2Farticles%2Fitem%2F5800-the-latin-mass-vigano-remembers-what-francis-wants-us-to-forget%2F&t_d=The%20Remnant%20Newspaper%20-%20THE%20LATIN%20MASS%3A%20Vigan%C3%B2%20Remembers%20What%20Francis%20Wants%20Us%20to%20Forget&t_t=The%20Remnant%20Newspaper%20-%20THE%20LATIN%20MASS%3A%20Vigan%C3%B2%20Remembers%20What%20Francis%20Wants%20Us%20to%20Forget&s_o=default#version=4474eb952b0ac3bafd98c3224c1d140cCarlo Maria Viganรฒ

Carlo Maria Viganรฒ

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganรฒ, Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana, served as the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States from 19 October 2011 to 12 April 2016. He previously served as Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State from 16 July 2009 to 3 September 2011.

His August 2018 bombshell on clerical sex abuse cover-up within the Church exposed corruption in the Church’s human element which extends even to the highest levels of the hierarchy.

His June 2020 Open Letter to Donald Trump was tweeted out by the president along with his gratitude and with a recommendation that everyone read it. 

Archbishop Viganรฒ’s frequent writings and interviews of the last few years refelect a true pastoral concern for the faithful throughout the world, and a strong commitment to the vows he made on his ordination day. 

Latest from Carlo Maria Viganรฒ

More in this category: ยซ ON VACCINES & TYRANNY: FSSP Priest Defends the Catholic Position THE GODLESS AGENDA: From Davos to the Vatican ยปยฉ 2022 The Remnant Newspaper, A Traditional Catholic Publication since 1967. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Developed by P5WebSolutions

The Remnant Newspaper

notification icon

We would like to alert you to new articles and features posted to the Remnant Newspaper.SubscribeLater

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ARCHBISHOP VIGANO SPEAKS!!!

BIDEN’S HYPOCRISY!!!!!

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Biden’s Hypocrisy on “Anti-Semitic and Islamist Extremists” & Financial Aid to Islamic Countries with Anti-Gay Laws including some “where being Gay is Legally Punishable by Death”

Image result for taliban  anti-gay laws

The Western Journal called out Joe Biden on his “hypocrisy” for collaborating with “anti-Semitic and Islamist extremists” groups:  

No where is the leftโ€™s hypocrisy more obvious then when it comes to their condemnation of โ€œracismโ€ and โ€œbigotry.โ€

While many on the far-left (which has seemingly overtaken the mainstream Democratic party) are quick to claim Republicans are racist for not agreeing with the efficacy of equity policies, those same leftists often overlook bigotry that can be found within their own ranks.

The argument can be easily made that the most pervasive form of bigotry within the American left today is antisemitism and the leftโ€™s current figurehead, Joe Biden, has touted the endorsements he has received from many of the groupโ€™s most egregious anti-Semites.

In a July [2020] message, Joe Biden thanked the members and supports of Emgage for their endorsement.Emgage is an anti-Israel Muslim PAC, largely funded by George Soros, that has been ensconced in controversy over the past several years for defending terrorist groups and collaborating with Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations.

As an official co-host of the Islamic Society of North Americaโ€™s conferences, Emgage associated itself with various anti-Semitic and Islamist extremists.[[https://www.westernjournal.com/joe-biden-touted-endorsements-leading-anti-semites/]

Moreover, Gateway Pundit reported that Biden in 2014 “linked Russiaโ€™s invasion into Ukraine to its anti-gay laws during a speech Saturday in Los Angeles. Biden addressed the Human Rights Council at their annual gala in Los Angeles.” In 2019, Biden said “he would withhold foreign aid from countries that persecute lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.”[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/03/joe-biden-links-russias-ukrainian-invasion-to-its-anti-gay-laws// and https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-lgbt-idUSKBN1WP20A%5D

But, the hypocrite Biden now said this month that he will give financial aid to Afghanistan’s Taliban who is allied with Pakistan both of whom have anti-gay laws:

Biden Admin To Give $308 Million To Afghanistan In Aid … 

Taliban cuts gay man into pieces to โ€˜show what they do … 

Taliban will ‘weed out and exterminate’ LGBT+ people in …

Pakistan votes no as UN calls for end to anti-gay …

Finally, why doesn’t the hypocritical Biden end aid to the apparently Islamic countries with anti-gay laws and some “where being gay is legally punishable by death” according to USA Today:

To identify the countries where being gay is still legally punishable by death, 24/7 Tempo reviewed various reports on human rights and homophobia by non-profit organizations providing help and legal advice to minorities, including members of the LGBTQ community across the world.

Yemen

In Yemen, the law states that unmarried gay men will be punished with 100 whip lashes or one year in prison, but married gay men face death by stoning. Gay women are to be imprisoned for up to three years.

Iran

In January 2019 a man in Iran was hanged after being found guilty of having sex with another man. Homosexuality was made a crime punishable by the death penalty in 1979 after the Islamic Revolution. In 2007, then-President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad infamously said during a visit to Columbia University: “In Iran, we don’t have homosexuals, like in your country.”

Brunei

Brunei recently made headlines for its new strict Islamic laws. Two of the most shocking measures were punishing thieves by amputation and making homosexual acts and adultery capital crimes. After several weeks of international outrage, the sultan of Brunei announced the latter laws would be placed under a moratorium.

Mauritania

Homosexuality has always been illegal in Mauritania, the 11th largest country in Africa by area. But it was not a capital crime. Offenders were sentenced to three years in prison until 1983, when an interpretation of Sharia law became the basis of the penal code. This made homosexuality a crime punishable by death. The method of execution is stoning.

Nigeria

In 2014, the then-president of Nigeria Goodluck Jonathan signed the Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act. Not only did it ban gay marriage, but it also banned the registration of gay clubs, societies and other organizations supporting the LGBT community. Public displays of affection between gay people is also prohibited. Anyone found guilty of homosexuality can be put in prison for up to 14 years. While this law is applied across the entire country, 12 northern states have their own laws, punishing gay men and women with death by stoning.

Qatar

Same-sex relations of any kind are illegal in Qatar and punishable by up to seven years in prison. Muslims in the country may face the death penalty, based on the interpretation of Sharia, if they are engaging in extramarital sex, regardless of whether the affair is between men, women, or a man and a woman.

Saudi Arabia

Relations between people of the same sex โ€” whether men or women โ€” can be tried as capital crimes in Saudi Arabia. Terrorism crimes are also capital offenses in Saudi Arabia. The punishment can also be flogging, but that depends on the perceived seriousness of the wrongdoing. The sentence for first-time offenders is often lashing or some prison time, while those caught more than once can be executed.

Afghanistan

Same-sex relationships are not recognized in Afghanistan. Gay men and women live in fear. The subject of homosexuality is a taboo. It’s almost never talked about and it is perceived as immoral, un-Islamic, and even as a disease. Honor killings, where relatives kill the gay man or woman to restore the family’s honor, are not unheard of. They can also be executed under local Sharia law. These laws are more likely to be enforced in Taliban, rural, and/or isolated communities.

Somalia

Intercourse between people of the same sex is illegal in Somalia. Such acts can result in prison terms from three months to three years. The punishment for other gay activities, defined as “acts of lust,” is also imprisonment but between two months and two years. In 2012, a newly adopted provisional constitution made Somalia’s interpretation of Sharia law “the supreme law of the country,” making homosexuality a crime that can be punished by flogging or the death penalty.

Sudan

Relationships between men are illegal in Sudan (the law is not clear about those between women.) Sodomy is prohibited and punishable by flogging and/or five years in prison. The punishment for a third conviction is death. Acts that are not sodomy but deemed indecent by authorities are punishable by 40 lashes and possible prison time for up to a year.

United Arab Emirates

All sex outside of heterosexual marriage is illegal and those convicted can be imprisoned for up to a year. The Penal Code is not explicitly clear about homosexuality being a capital crime or not. The legal lingo can be interpreted as making all male homosexual intercourse a capital crime but it can also mean that it’s only for forced male homosexual intercourse. Consensual homosexual relations are punishable in several ways, including hanging. There is no record to date of consensual homosexual acts being punished by anything but jail terms of differing lengths and fines.

Pakistan

LGBT rights in Pakistan are a taboo topic. Homosexual acts are illegal. The country’s Penal Code states that “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” โ€” which can mean homosexuality, even though it’s not explicitly mentioned โ€” is punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment from two years to life.

24/7 Wall Street is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news and commentary. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. [https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/06/14/countries-where-being-gay-is-legally-punishable-by-death/39574685/]

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html  

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chรกvez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by โ€œOne of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1 – A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1 What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1] 
Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it. Pray an Our Father now for America. Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on BIDEN’S HYPOCRISY!!!!!

GOOD FOR YOU

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

IVERMECTIN: EARLY, OFTER AND FULL BORE

THE FRED MARTINEZ REPORT

SEARCH

“Ivermectin: Early, often, and full bore… the following is not medical advice, I am just relating what I did”

Thanks to Mark and Ann for letting me post the whole Ivermectin piece on the FM Report:

non veni pacem

The Splendor of Truth

Ivermectin: Early, often, and full bore

Posted on 

Cross-posting here a letter AB received. The points are spot on, and coincide with my own experience. I was already taking the preventive protocol, of course, but I did not start the amped up โ€œearly treatmentโ€ dosage of 0.6mg/kg of body weight until Day 3 of the coof, because I didnโ€™t think I had the coof. That was stupid of me. DONโ€™T WAIT. Amp up the dose. The following is not medical advice, I am just relating what I did: 14 straight days at the higher dose (alternating 0.4-0.6mg/kg)โ€ฆ folks, for my 250 frame, that is a full HALF TUBE of pony paste every day. Your instinct will tell you itโ€™s too much, but itโ€™s fine. Maybe a little blurry vision at worst. If you absolutely insist on getting the oral tablets and overpaying, then by all means get on alldaychemist and order the 100 tabs of 12mg each and pay $112. It will arrive from India in three weeks. But Jefferโ€™s Equine will get you the past in five days for $6 a tube. If you wait until you get sick, forget it.


Mailbag: DO NOT HESITATE with the Ivermectin.

Ann,

I want to ask you to please remind your readers not to be afraid to pull 
the trigger on actually using Ivermectin as soon as you suspect you have 
Covid.

My wife and I, and two very close friends and their wives, all got Covid
at the same time, but not from each other.  We were all prepared with
Ivermectin.  My wife is 70 years old, and Iโ€™m 63. We took ours even
before we had the test results, and both of us recovered in under 4
days.  My wife had a fever for less than a day, and the sniffles for a
few days.  I had a fever for about 3 days and then felt better, although
my cough lingered at a very low level for about 2 weeks.

On the other hand, one friend and his wife struggled through it for a
week before taking the Ivermectin.  He ended up in the hospital for 2
weeks, and has been struggling with breathing ever since.  He is very
athletic, and was in excellent physical condition, having trained
assiduously for the ski season.  Now he can barely walk across the room
without getting winded. Fortunately he is improving, but itโ€™s been very
difficult.

My other friend and his wife also hesitated to pull the trigger until it
was too late.  She has a comorbid lung condition and is still
recovering, but her husband, my close friend, was overweight and
diabetic.  He passed away a week before Christmas.  Not only did they
hesitate to take the Ivermectin, but they did not have enough.

I asked them both why they hesitated, and it was because of the cost.
The Ivermectin I got (human, not farm), is $115 per box, each box being
24 pills, 6 mg each [Price gouging โ€“ thatโ€™s $0.80 per milligram. At that price, the 500mL bottles of the 1% injectable solution that I buy and give away, which contain 5000 milligrams of Ivermectin per bottle, would have a street value of $4000. -AB]  For me, it takes about 1 1/2 boxes for a full
course of treatment.  So itโ€™s not cheap, and I understand why they
wanted to keep it โ€œuntil they really need it.โ€  What they didnโ€™t realize
is that the time โ€œthey really need itโ€ is as soon as they think theyโ€™ve
got it, even before the test results come back.

Please emphasize EARLY treatment!

Also, I work for a health system in the Mid-Atlantic area.  I see the
Covid stats in our hospitals multiple times per day.  Iโ€™ve been watching
the relative percentages of โ€œvaccinatedโ€ vs. โ€œunvaccinatedโ€ patients
with Covid in our hospitals for months.  Back in early December, the
percentage of โ€œvaccinatedโ€ patients with Covid in our hospitals was
hovering between 25% and 30%, with under 5% of them requiring ventilation.

Boy has it changed!  There has been a dramatic spike in patients
admitted WITH Covid (not FOR Covid).  We have about 500% more patients
with Covid than we did at the beginning of December.  But the real
story, as far as I am concerned, is that the relative percentages of
โ€œvaccinatedโ€ vs. โ€œunvaccinatedโ€ have dramatically shifted.

As of this morning, 50% of our Covid patients are โ€œvaccinatedโ€ and 50%
are โ€œunvaccinatedโ€.  Out of all the Covid patients in the ICU, 37% are
โ€œvaccinatedโ€.  Out of all the patients on ventilators, almost 40% are
โ€œvaccinatedโ€.  This is from a sample size of about 600 patients.  Also,
as the percentage of โ€œvaccinatedโ€ Covid patients has risen, so has the
percentage of ventilator patients who are โ€œvaccinatedโ€.  Now the
percentage of โ€œvaccinatedโ€ Covid patients on ventilators is 8%.

Practically every clinical person in this health system sees these
numbers every time they log into the Electronic Medical Record.  So they
know whatโ€™s happening.  Thereโ€™s no way they donโ€™t.

โ€œA pandemic of the unvaccinatedโ€ is a bunch of horse s***!

Thanks for all the good work you do.  If you choose to publish any of
this information, please do not use my name.

Sincerely,

X

p.s., My friend who died received Last Rites and the Apostolic Pardon.
Praised be Jesus Christ!

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chรกvez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by โ€œOne of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1 – A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1 What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1] 
Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IVERMECTIN: EARLY, OFTER AND FULL BORE

Thousands of Americans have died needlessly because of weaponized disinformation.


Politicizing COVID-19 

From the Start

Thousands of Americans have died needlessly because of weaponized disinformation.

By: VICTOR DAVIS HANSON

The Patriot Post

January 13, 2022

From the moment COVID-19 appeared, the pandemic became inseparable from politics.

Political frenzy was inevitable since the SARS-CoV-2 virus may have escaped from a level-4 security virology lab in Wuhan, China.

The rapid-fire spread soon threatened to indict the Chinese communist government for nearly destroying the world economy and killing millions.

Western elites, in response, feared that their lucrative investments in China would be jeopardized by such disclosures โ€” and so acted accordingly in defending Beijing.

Nonetheless, one scenario that remains intriguing is that the escaped virus was birthed by gain-of-function research scientists, overseen by elements of the Chinese communist military. Worse, the lab was given subsidies by U.S. health authorities, routed through third parties. Hiding all of that damaging information warped government policy and media coverage.

Belatedly, a panicked China shut down all domestic travel in and out of Wuhan โ€” but not flights abroad to Western Europe and the United States.

The rest is history.

From the outset, the World Health Organization simply spread false talking points about the outbreak from the Chinese government, delaying a robust global response.

Former President Donald Trumpโ€™s political opponents initially told Americans to shop and travel as usual โ€” only to pivot as cases mounted and they blamed the president.

The U.S. 2020 ban on travel from China was met with charges of racism and xenophobia from presidential candidates. Ironically, many were simply channeling racist and xenophobic Chinaโ€™s propaganda.

Many doctors kept hammering the need for therapeutics, including taboo off-label use of cheap generic drugs. The use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin was widely ridiculed, despite continuing studies from abroad attesting to their usefulness.

Trumpโ€™s Operation Warp Speed project to develop vaccinations was also pilloried. Candidates Kamala Harris and Joe Biden did their best to talk down the safety of the impending inoculations. But once in power, they projected their prior harmful rhetoric onto so-called โ€œanti-vaxxers.โ€

Then they claimed credit for the initial success of the Trump vaccinations.

The Pfizer corporation had promised a major pre-election announcement about its likely rollout of a vaccine in October, just days before the 2020 election.

Then, mysteriously, Pfizer claimed the vaccine, in fact, would not be ready before November 3. A few days after the election of Joe Biden, the company reversed course and announced the vaccinations would soon be available.

Then-New York Governor Andrew Cuomo obstructed most all federal help with Trumpโ€™s fingerprints on it. That way Cuomo became a media, Emmy-winning darling โ€” before resigning in disgrace.

Cuomoโ€™s policies of steering infected patients into long-term-care facilities doomed over 10,000 of the elderly. New York is now illegally using race to grant preferences in the allotments of tests and new drugs.

The rhetoric of the media-progressive nexus that mandatory, massive lockdowns were necessary all but destroyed a booming Trump economy and denied critical medical care to millions. Emphasizing therapeutics, natural herd immunity, and the resilience of the youth to the disease were all pronounced โ€œanti-scienceโ€ by the demagogues on the Left.

Various celebrities and politicos โ€” such as California Governor Gavin Newsom and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton โ€” boasted the pandemic lockdown offered the perfect crisis that must not go to waste politically. Actress Jane Fonda even crowed that COVID-19 was a โ€œgift from God to the Leftโ€ in helping to end Donald Trump.

In the waning days of the 2022 campaign, Biden went so far as to blame Trump personally for all the deaths from the virus.

Once the vaccinations had seemed to work in early 2021, an upbeat Joe Biden boasted that he would end the virus by summer 2021, by following โ€œthe science.โ€ He went so far as to claim that no one had been vaccinated before his inauguration even though 17 million, including Biden himself, had been.

Then Nemesis answered such hubris.

The unforeseen delta and omicron variants hit. A new phrase, โ€œbreakthrough case,โ€ revealed that the vaccinations often could only prevent serious illness, but not infection or infectiousness.

Suddenly the best and brightest people with three shots, who had blasted the red-state rubes as the ignorant un-vaxxed โ€” got sick. More have now died from the virus on Bidenโ€™s than on Trumpโ€™s watch.

A warped economy amid renewed COVID-19 outbreaks helped to further destroy Bidenโ€™s waning popularity.

In reaction, the Left now calls for realism, emphasis on treatments, and acknowledgment of the value of natural immunities. It is even newly curious about the origins of the virus, and the need to โ€œget back to normal.โ€

We are suddenly told that thousands had died โ€œwithโ€ rather than โ€œbecauseโ€ of COVID โ€” the exact opposite of what we heard in the Trump era.

A skeptic might suggest terror over the impending midterms finally made the Left face reality.

Politicizing the pandemic is a euphemism. In truth, thousands of Americans have died needlessly because of weaponized disinformation about Chinaโ€™s culpability, vaccines, useful drugs, lockdowns, racial preferences, and long-care facilities.

___________

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

By a vote of 6 to 3 (liberals in dissent), the Court granted the stay of the OSHA mandate.ย https://aboutblaw.com/1fHย  By a vote of 5 to 4 (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, ACB in dissent), the Court granted the Biden Administrationโ€™s request for a stay of the injunctions against the HHS mandate.ย https://aboutblaw.com/1fIย  Iโ€™ve done a quick thread on the OSHA caseย 

Print allIn new windowSCOTUS ruling on OSHA vaccine mandate; law prof Eric Claeys on Roe’s viability holding; Ed Whelanย <ewhelan@eppc.org>ย Unsubscribe2:20 PM (1 hour ago)toย meWithin the last hour or so, the Court issued its rulings on the stay requests in the OSHA and HHS vaccine mandate cases. By a vote of 6 to 3 (liberals in dissent), the Court granted the stay of the OSHA mandate.ย https://aboutblaw.com/1fHย  By a vote of 5 to 4 (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, ACB in dissent), the Court granted the Biden Administrationโ€™s request for a stay of the injunctions against the HHS mandate.ย https://aboutblaw.com/1fIย  Iโ€™ve done a quick thread on the OSHA case here.https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1481713572229042176ย Here are some recent posts from NROโ€™s Bench Memos:Law Prof Eric Claeys onย Roeโ€™s Viability HoldingByย ED WHELANJanuary 12, 2022 4:44 PMRoe v. Wadeย andย Planned Parenthood v. Caseyย have been widely understood to forbid prohibitions on abortion before viability. That is so for one very good reason: that is exactly what they say and hold.In a forthcoming law-reviewย articleย and anย ongoingย seriesย of guest blog postsย at the Volokh Conspiracy, law professor Eric Claeys systematically dismantles an alternative theory ofย Roeย andย Caseyย that Chief Justice Roberts โ€œseemed to suggestโ€ at oral argument inย Dobbs v. Jackson Womenโ€™s Health Organization: namely, thatย Roeย andย Caseyย instead entitle women only to โ€œfair opportunities to obtain abortions sometime during their pregnancies.โ€ (The quoted language is Claeysโ€™s interpretation of what he calls the Chiefโ€™s โ€œexploratory theory.โ€) If this reconception ofย Roeย andย Caseyย were sound or even plausible, the Court could vote to uphold Mississippiโ€™s ban on abortion after 15 weeks of viability without also overrulingย Roeย andย Casey.As Claeys compellingly and exhaustively demonstrates, this alternative theory badly misreadsย Roeย andย Casey. In hisย postย today, Claeys reminds readers that Roe declared a statute unconstitutional on its face. He explains how โ€œRoeโ€™s judgment relied on a rule of decision about overbreadthโ€ that โ€œmade the standard of viability necessaryโ€”in the sense of indispensableโ€”to the declaratory judgment delivered inย Roe.โ€ An excerpt:Inย Roeย the Court noted, with approval, that in abortion challenges lower federal courts had been applying the overbreadth doctrine. Later, in the part of the opinion most necessary to the Courtโ€™s judgment (Part X), the Court โ€œmeasuredโ€ the Texas prohibitions โ€œagainst the standardsโ€ it had drawn via its trimester framework. The Court found that the statute โ€œmakes no distinction between abortions performed early in pregnancy and those performed later.โ€ On that basis, the Court concluded that the key statute โ€œsweeps too broadlyโ€ and โ€œcannot survive the constitutional attack made upon it.โ€ย Although the Court could have been a lot more direct about the rules it was applying, โ€œsweeps too broadlyโ€ makes clear that the Court was conducting an overbreadth analysis. As yesterdayโ€™s post showed, the Court demonstrated that the Texas statutes under challenge threatened a constitutional right it had just announced. The Court conducted the sort of comparisonย Broadrickย [v. Oklahomaย (1973)] called for when it observed that the key Texas statute prohibitedย bothย abortions โ€œearly in pregnancyย andย those performed later.โ€ The abortions โ€œearly in pregnancyโ€ were the constitutionally-protected abortions chilled by the key statute; the ones โ€œperformed laterโ€ were the ones that the statute could prohibit constitutionally. But how did the Court know which intended abortions were protected and which ones were not? From the passages ofย Roeย specifying abortion rights via the police powers. And in particular, from the passages declaring that fetusesโ€™ and statesโ€™ interests in fetal life do not become โ€œcompellingโ€ until viability.ย And that account should make clear how deeply intertwined viability is withย Roeโ€˜s judgmentโ€ฆ. Inย Roe, it made not one difference that Roe didnโ€™t allege anything about whether her pregnancy was before or after the viability threshold. Since overbreadth doctrine applies to abortion challenges, the Court could declare a restriction on abortion unconstitutional on its face, by roving to find a substantial number of situations in which the restrictions would chill the exercise of abortion rights.ย In short, โ€ฆ [Roeโ€˜s overbreadth] proposition applies black-letter overbreadth doctrine to a state law restricting abortion rights: Such a law is unconstitutional on its face if it restricts pregnant womenโ€™s federal substantive due process abortion rights unconstitutionally, and if the number of situations in which it applies unconstitutionally seems substantial in relation to the number of situations in which the law could restrict abortion rights constitutionally. That proposition also makes viability necessaryโ€”indispensable, reallyโ€”toย Roeโ€˜s holding. Viability was the proxy the Court used to classify different possible applications of the challenged statutes as constitutional or unconstitutional. Since viability was the sorting mechanism the Court used to conduct overbreadth analysis, it is part of the reason for decision about overbreadth.Claeys soundly concludes that there is no middle ground inย Dobbsย between overrulingย Roeย andย Casey, on the one hand, and re-affirming them, on the other. If the Court is to allow the Mississippi 15-week law to operate, it must overruleย Roeย andย Casey.This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 13Byย ED WHELANJanuary 13, 2022 8:00 AM2019โ€”Federal district judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. enters an order (inย California v. HHS) blocking the Trump administration from implementing its rules creating a religious and moral exemption to the HHS contraceptive mandate.A year and a half later, inย Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court will rule by a 7-2 vote that the Trump administration had authority to promulgate the rules.This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 12Byย ED WHELANJanuary 12, 2022 8:00 AM1971โ€”Justices Douglas, Brennan and Marshall dissent from the Courtโ€™s ruling (inย Wyman v. James) that a state may condition a personโ€™s receipt of benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program on that personโ€™s permitting home visits by a caseworker. Douglas simplistically misstates the โ€œcentral questionโ€ as โ€œwhether the government by force of its largesse has the power to โ€˜buy upโ€™ rights guaranteed by the Constitution,โ€ but the real difficulty comes in sorting out in a principled fashion why the answer to that overbroad question is in some circumstances yes and in others no.Evidently oblivious to his own career of abusing power, Douglas, who clearly viewed himself as a great man, also quotes Lord Acton: โ€œPower tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.ย Great men are almost always bad men, [especially] when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority.โ€
This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 11Byย ED WHELANJanuary 11, 2022 8:00 AM1954โ€”President Eisenhower nominates former California governor Earl Warren to serve as Chief Justice. Warren is already serving as Chief Justice pursuant to a recess appointment by Eisenhower in October 1953. Years later, Eisenhower will call his appointment of Warren โ€œthe biggest damned-fool mistake I ever made.โ€ Those familiar with the legacy of Justice William Brennan, also appointed by Eisenhower, might vigorously dispute that proposition. But Eisenhowerโ€™s death in 1969 prevented him from fully comparing what he accurately labeled his two biggest mistakes.2016โ€”When is discrimination on the basis of sex just fine? When it operates against men to produce welcome results. Such is the lesson of the Fourth Circuitโ€™s ruling (inย Bauer v. Lynch) against an FBI trainee, Jay J. Bauer, who complained that the FBI discriminated against him on the basis of sex.Bauer failed the FBIโ€™s physical-fitness test (PFT) when he fell one push-up short of the minimum of 30 required for men. For women, the push-up minimum was only 14 (and the other thresholds were also easier to meet). So Bauer sued on the ground that the differential standards for men and women violated Title VIIโ€™s basic ban on discrimination on the basis of sex as well as its specific ban on the use, on the basis of sex, of โ€œdifferent cutoff scores for โ€ฆ employment related tests.โ€ The federal district court granted summary judgment in his favor.But the Fourth Circuit panel of Obama and Clinton appointees somehow sees things very differently. The Fourth Circuit accepts the Obama administrationโ€™s argument that theย โ€œPFTโ€™sย gender-normed standards actually require the same level of fitness for all Traineesโ€ because โ€œequally fit men and women possess innate physiological differences that lead to different performance outcomes.โ€ Therefore, theย PFTย standards โ€œdo not treat the sexes differently.โ€The Left seems to invoke โ€œinnate physiological differencesโ€ between the sexes only when doing so favors women. The โ€œgender-normed standards,โ€ by their very nature, โ€œtreat the sexes differently.โ€ That is their very purpose. Further, they impose a differential โ€œcutoffโ€ on the basis of sex that the text of Title VII specifically forbids.ย This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 10Byย ED WHELANJanuary 10, 2022 8:00 AM2006โ€”Less than eight years out of law school, Berkeley law professor Goodwin Liu submits his written testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee opposing the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito. Liu concludes his testimony with this demagogic rant:Judge Alitoโ€™s record envisions an America where police may shoot and kill an unarmed boy to stop him from running away with a stolen purse; where federal agents may point guns at ordinary citizens during a raid, even after no sign of resistance; where the FBI may install a camera where you sleep on the promise that they wonโ€™t turn it on unless an informant is in the room; where a black man may be sentenced to death by an all-white jury for killing a white man, absent a multiple regression analysis showing discrimination, and where police may search what a warrant permits, and then some.Nominated a mere four years later by President Obama to a Ninth Circuit seat, Liu acknowledges at his confirmation hearing only that his testimony against Alito used โ€œperhaps unnecessarily flowery language.โ€ย Pressed further in post-hearing questions, Liu evidently finally perceives it as in his interest to offer an apology of sorts, though he canโ€™t do so without trying to depict himself as a victim:[U]pon rereading and reflecting on this passage in response to this question, I believe the passage is unduly harsh and provocative and does not add to the fifteen pages of legal analysis that preceded it. What troubles me most is that the passage has an ad hominem quality that is unfair and hurtful to the nomineeโ€”a reality that, in all candor, I did not appreciate then nearly as much as I appreciate now.In May 2011, Liu will abandon his Ninth Circuit nomination after Democrat Ben Nelson joins Senate Republicans in defeating a cloture vote. But California governor Jerry Brown will then appoint Liu to the state supreme court.In 2018, aย joint projectย of Berkeley Lawโ€™s California Constitution Center and the Hastings Law Journal will rank Liu as the most liberal justice of the California supreme court, both overall and in each of five subcategories.ย This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 9Byย ED WHELANJanuary 9, 2022 8:00 AM1979โ€”Inย Colautti v. Franklin, the Supreme Court rules unconstitutional, by a vote of 6 to 3, a Pennsylvania statute that requires that if an abortionist determines that a human fetus โ€œis viableโ€ or โ€œif there is sufficient reason to believe that the fetus may be viable,โ€ the abortionist must (except where โ€œnecessary in order to preserve the life or health of the motherโ€) use the abortion technique that โ€œwould provide the best opportunity for the fetus to be aborted aliveโ€ (i.e., to survive the abortion). Justice Blackmunโ€™s majority opinion holds that the statuteโ€™s viability benchmarks โ€œdiffer in some indeterminate way from the definition of viability as set forth inย Roeโ€ and in one other precedent and are unconstitutionally vague.This being abortion litigationโ€”in which the ordinary rules somehow donโ€™t applyโ€”the majority doesnโ€™t see fit to adopt a sensible interpretation of the statute that would avoid its concerns, to limit the statute to permissible applications, or to obtain the Pennsylvania supreme courtโ€™s authoritative reading of the meaning of the statute.JFK-appointee Byron White, in dissent (joined by Chief Justice Burger and Justice Rehnquist), argues that the statuteโ€™s language is not measurably different fromย Roeโ€™s discussion of viability (โ€œpotentially able to live outside the motherโ€™s wombโ€) and complains of the majorityโ€™s โ€œunalterable determination to invalidateโ€ the statute by its โ€œincredible construction.โ€ย This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 8Byย ED WHELANJanuary 8, 2022 8:00 AM2010โ€”Solicitor General Elena Kaganย personally assignsย her deputy Neal Katyal to be part of โ€œa group to get thinking about how to defend against inevitable challenges to the health care proposals that are pending.โ€ Katyal promptly informs the Associate Attorney Generalโ€™s office that โ€œElena would definitely like OSG [the Office of the Solicitor General] to be involved in this set of issues,โ€ that he will take the lead, and that โ€œwe will bring Elena in as needed.โ€ Two months later, with litigation impending, Kagan and Katyal consult on who should attend a White House meeting on what Katyal calls โ€œlitigation of singular importance.โ€But in connection with (and presumably to facilitate) her nomination to the Supreme Court in May 2010, Kagan will nurture the notion that she had somehow (for utterly inexplicable reasons) โ€œbeen walled off from Day Oneโ€ from the litigation over Obamacare, and, after her appointment to the Court, she will decline to recuse herself from deciding cases arising from that initial round of litigation in which she took part. Instead, she will provide the decisive fifth vote inย NFIB v. Sebeliusย (2012) rejecting the constitutional challenge to Obamacareโ€™s individual mandate.2020โ€”In a video that she sends to San Franciscoโ€™s left-wing district attorney Chesa Boudin for his swearing-in, Justice Sonia Sotomayor somehow sees fit to tell Boudin โ€œhow much I admire you,โ€ to praise his โ€œstrength of character and moral composure,โ€ to call him โ€œa great beacon to many,โ€ and to say that San Francisco โ€œwill be so very well servedโ€ by him.Boudin will quickly earn a reputation for being soft on crime and for being an incompetent manager. Two of his own top prosecutors will resign from his office in October 2021 and join the campaign to remove him from office via a recall election in June 2022.ย This Day in Liberal Judicial Activismโ€”January 7Byย ED WHELANJanuary 7, 2022 8:00 AMย 2006โ€”Illustrating how deeply Democratic attacks on Republican judicial nominees have descended into farce, Senator Edward M. Kennedy fulminates in aย Washington Postย op-ed, two days before the start of Samuel Alitoโ€™s hearing on his Supreme Court nomination, that โ€œcredibilityโ€ is a โ€œmajor issueโ€ for Alito. (Seeย hereย for more.)ย ย ย M. Edward Whelan III
Distinguished Senior Fellow andAntonin Scalia Chair in Constitutional Studies
Ethics and Public Policy Center
1730 M Street N.W., Suite 910
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-682-1200
www.EPPC.orgย Sign upย for email distributions of my blog posts and other writingsย ย 
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on By a vote of 6 to 3 (liberals in dissent), the Court granted the stay of the OSHA mandate.ย https://aboutblaw.com/1fHย  By a vote of 5 to 4 (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, ACB in dissent), the Court granted the Biden Administrationโ€™s request for a stay of the injunctions against the HHS mandate.ย https://aboutblaw.com/1fIย  Iโ€™ve done a quick thread on the OSHA caseย 

TWO EMPERORS IN TROUBLE AND A MOTHER’S PRAYER FOR HER GROPING SON

Ordo Dei

A site about matters of the Catholic Church, history, philosophy, and literature

Two Emperors in Trouble and a Motherโ€™s Prayer for Her Groping Son

hicksonfamilyLiterature  January 6, 2022 13 Minutes

Dr. Robert Hickson

6 January 2022

Feast of the Epiphany of the Lord

Two Emperors in Trouble and a Motherโ€™s Prayer for Her Groping Son:

Evelyn Waughโ€™s 1950 Presentation of Saint Helenaโ€™s Deepening Faith and Eloquence

Epigraphs

***

โ€œโ€™I know I am human. In fact I often feel [says Constantine himself to his Empress Mother as the reigning Emperor; and, moreover, still โ€œan unbaptized convertโ€ (138)] that I am the only real humanโ€ฆ.And thatโ€™s not pleasant at all, I can assure you. Do you understand at all, mother?โ€˜

โ€˜Oh, yes, perfectly.โ€™

โ€˜What is it, then?โ€™

โ€˜Power without Grace,โ€™ said Helena [the future Saint Helena].

โ€˜Now you are going to start nagging about baptism again.โ€™

โ€˜Sometimes,โ€™ Helena continued, โ€˜I have a terrible dream of the future. Not now, but presently, people may forget their loyalty to their kings and emperors and take power for themselves. Instead of letting one victim bear this frightful curse [of just and sustained ruling] they will take it all on themselves each one of them. Think of the misery of a whole world possessed of Power without Grace.โ€™โ€ฆ

โ€˜We talked of it years agoโ€ฆ.I have always remembered your words [,Constantine]. You said: โ€˜If I wish to live, I must determine to rule.โ€™ โ€˜

โ€˜And that is true today.โ€™ [said her son, Emperor Constantine]

โ€˜But, not without Grace, Constantine.โ€™

โ€˜Baptism. It always comes back to that in the end. Well, Iโ€™m going to be baptized, never fear. But not yet. In my own time. Iโ€™ve got other things to do before thatโ€ฆ. [even though he was still โ€œone indeed who was not yet formally admitted as a catechumenโ€! (138)]โ€ฆ.โ€™โ€

(Evelyn Waugh, Helena (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1950), pages 185-186โ€”my bold emphasis added; italics in the original.)

***

โ€œIn the inmost cell of the foetid termitary of power, Diocletian [the Emperor Diocletian] was consumed by huge boredom and sickly turned towards his childhoodโ€™s home. He ordained a house of refuge on the [Dalmatian coast] shores of the Adriatic.โ€ (Evelyn Waugh, Helena, page 100โ€”my emphasis added)

***

โ€œEverywhere Constantine prospered until he became blandly [so presumptuously and delusively?] aware that he was invincibleโ€ฆ.There were glimpses of [his son, Crispus] a nobler figure; young Crispus, all dash and fidelity, last warrior of the high Roman tradition on whose shield the fanciful might descry the fading blazon of Hector [of Troy]. Reports of him [and his death] came to Helenaโ€ฆ.His name was remembered always at her palace Mass. For Helena had been baptized.

โ€œNone knows when or where. No record was made. Nothing was built or founded. There was no public holiday. Privately and humbly, like thousands of others, she stepped down into the font and emerged a new woman. Were there regrets for her earlier loyalty? Was she persuaded point by point? Did she merely conform to the prevailing fashion, lie open unresisting to Divine Grace and so without design become its brimming vehicle? We do not know. She was one seed in a vast germination. (Evelyn Waugh, Helena, page 132โ€”my emphasis added)

***

โ€œโ€™Iโ€™m only teasing, Lactantius [said Helena, but before she herself became a Christian]. Of course I know why you are all so excited. I confess I am a little uneasy myself. Itโ€™s this story that is going around that my boy has turned Christian. Has he?โ€™

โ€˜Not exactly, maโ€™am, as far as we can learn. But he has put himself under the protection of Christ.โ€™

โ€˜Why will no one ever talk plain sense to me? Am I too stupid? It is all I have ever asked, all my life, a straight answer to a straight question; and I never get oneโ€ฆ.All I want is the simple truth. Why donโ€™t you answer me?โ€™

After a pause Lactantius said: โ€˜Perhaps because I have read too much. Iโ€™m not the person to come to with straight and simple questions, maโ€™am. I donโ€™t know the answers [to your several questions]โ€ฆ.We all have the chance to choose the Truthโ€ฆ.As you know he [Constantine] has brought the Church into the open.โ€™

โ€˜Beside Jupiter and Isis and the Phrygian Venus.โ€™ [said Helena]

โ€˜Christianity is not that sort of religion, maโ€™am. It cannot share anything [of the sort] with anybody. Whenever it is free, it will conquer.โ€™

โ€˜Perhaps there was some point in the persecutions then.โ€™

โ€˜The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church.โ€™ [said Waughโ€™s Lactantius to an attentive and receptive Helena, though as yet unbaptized; Helena, pages 127-128]

***

In 1912, three years before World War I began, Hilare Belloc first published an essay entitled โ€œThe Decline of a State.โ€1 And this compact essay, full of fresh insights, unexpectedly concluded with a memorable and challenging sentence:

Those who have least power in the decline of a State are priests, soldiers, the mothers of many children, the lovers of one woman, and saints. (242)

After my further reflecting upon Bellocโ€™s selection of especially vulnerable persons in a time of decline and disorder, I recalled some passages from Evelyn Waughโ€™s historical novel, Helena (1950), especially two of Waughโ€™s formulations about the insufficiency of โ€œPowerโ€: Emperor Diocletianโ€™s own boring and โ€œfoetid termitary of powerโ€; and Emperor Constantineโ€™s own self-sabotaging โ€œpower without Graceโ€ as envisioned and articulated to her son by his mother, Helena, and concerning an imagined future ochlocracy or mob rule that is likewise trying to rule โ€œwithout Graceโ€.

In this context, we may even slightly expand Bellocโ€™s original phrase concerning the vulnerable: namely,โ€œthose who have least power in the decline of a state [and amidst โ€œpower without Graceโ€].โ€

With this slight amendment in mind, we now propose to examine Bellocโ€™s essay more closely. It will be conducted โ€œon the premise that sustained power without Grace is inherently selfโ€“sabotaging and is presented by a โ€˜foetid termitary.โ€™โ€ (Waughโ€™s scented termite analogy is a vivid one for sure!)

One of Bellocโ€™s main contributions is his examination of the influence and destructive consequences of โ€œtwo vicesโ€ (240)โ€”โ€œAvariceโ€ and โ€œFearโ€โ€”in the decline of a State, especially as practiced in โ€œan oligarchic State, or aristocracy as it is called.โ€ (237) For example, he says:

In the decline of a State, of whatever nature that State be [democratic, despotic, oligarchic, or aristocratic], two vices will immediately appear and grow: these are Avarice and Fear; and men will more readily accept the imputation of Avarice than of Fear, for Avarice is the less despicable of the twoโ€”yet in fact Fear will be by far the strongest passion of the time [i.e., during the time of a growing decline]. (240โ€”my bold emphasis and italics added)

By way of clarifying contrast, Belloc elsewhere in his writings often accents the perilous combination of โ€œinsecurity and insufficiencyโ€ both of which all too often tend to increase the passions and the vices of Avarice and Fear.

Let us now consider some of Bellocโ€™s framing introductory words to his analysis:

The decline of a State is not equivalent to a mortal sickness therein. States are organisms subject to diseases and to decayโ€ฆ; but they are not subject to a rhythmic rise and fallโ€ฆ. A State in decline is never a State doomed or a State dying. States perish slowly or by violence, but never without remedy and rarely without violence. (237โ€”my emphasis added)

Belloc then refers to the โ€œtextureโ€ (237) of a State and its decline, namely whether or not it is mostly democratic, despotic, oligarchic or aristocraticโ€”or some combination of them. For example, and also promptly recalling his own England as of 1911, he says:

An oligarchic State, or aristocracy as it is called, will decline principally through two agencies which are, first, illusion, and secondarily, lack of civic aptitude. For an oligarchic State tends very readily to illusion, being conducted by men who live at leisure, satisfy their passions, are immune from the laws, and prefer to shelter themselves from reality. Their capacity or appetite for illusion will rapidly pervade those below them, for in an aristocracy the rulers are subjected to a sort of worship from the rest of the community, and thus it comes about that aristocracies in their decline accept fantastic histories of their own past, conceive victory possible without armies, wealth to be an indication of ability, and national security to be a natural gift rather that a [disciplined and virtuous] product of the [informed] will.(237-238โ€”my emphasis added)

Now he passes on to the second factor (or โ€œagencyโ€) of a growing โ€œlack of civic aptitudeโ€ in the decline of a State:

Such [oligarchic-aristocratic] communities further fail from a lack of civic aptitudeโ€ฆ,which means that they deliberately elect to leave the mass of citizens incompetent and irresponsible for generations, so that, when any more strain is upon them, they look at once for some men other than themselves to relieve them, and [they] are incapable of corporate action upon their own account. (238โ€”my emphasis added)

Belloc then touches upon real differences between โ€œa great State or a small oneโ€ (238) and the factors of โ€œindifference, faction, ignorance, and private spiteโ€ (238). States are โ€œrooted originally in commerce, in arms, or in productionโ€ whether as they be artisan or be peasant-agricultural. He weighs and differentiates โ€œthe basis of the Stateโ€ (239) more specifically and more concretely. These candid observations we recommend to the attention of the reader, that he may better savor the diversities.

It is fitting that we now further consider Bellocโ€™s focused insights and his illustrations of โ€œAvariceโ€ and โ€œFearโ€ and their sabotaging influences in a growing decline of a State.

First, Avarice, as a passion and vice, thus an habitual deadly sin, under conditions of decline:

Avarice will show itself not indeed in a mere greed of gain (for this is common to all societies whether flourishing or failing), but rather in a sort of taking for granted and permeation of the mere love of money, so that history will be explained by it, wars judged by their booty or begun in order to enrich a few, love between men and women wholly subordinated to it [money], especially among the rich: wealth made a test for responsibility and great salaries invented and paid to those who serve the State [a declining State, moreover]. This vice will also be apparent in the easy acquaintance of all who are possessed of wealth and their segregation from the less fortunate, for avarice cleaves society flatways, keeping the scum of it quite clear of the middle, the middle of it [society] quite clear of the dregs, and so forth. It is a further mark of avarice in its last stages that the rich are surrounded with lies in which they themselves believe. Thus, in the last phase [of avariceโ€™s illusion], there are no parasites but only friends, no gifts but only loans, which are more esteemed favours than gifts once were. No one [is] vicious but only tedious, and no one a poltroon but only slack. (240-241โ€”my emphasis added)

Although Bellocโ€™s analysis is largely a secular analysis, Waughโ€™s Saint Helenaโ€”if not her sonโ€”would have detected new and crippling forms of Fear and of Cunning Carnal Prudence and Weakness without Grace. We may also consider the broken trust and increasing fears in our own society and decomposing civilization, at least as of 2022:

Of Fear in the decline of a State it may be said that it is so much the master passion of such decline as to eat up all others. Coming by travel from a healthy State to one diseased, Fear is the first point you take. Men dare not print or say what they feel of the judges, the public governors, the action of the police, [of] the controllers of fortunes and of newsโ€ฆ.Under the influence of Fear, to tell the least little truth about him [โ€œa powerful ministerโ€] will put a whole assembly into a sort of blankness.

This vice [of Fear] has for its most laughable effects the raising of a whole host of phantoms [subtle deceptions, or sensate โ€œfake news,โ€ perhaps?], and when a State is so far gone that civic Fear is quite normal to the citizens, then you will find them blenching with terror at a piece of print, a whispered accusation [e.g., about the immunities of International High Finance or the Money-Laundering of International Drug-Money Networks]. (241-242โ€”my emphasis added)

By way of concluding his selectively nuanced essay, Belloc gives a glimpse of those who darkly and dubiously flourish in times of a Stateโ€™s disorder and decline, as well as those who preserve some kind of independence or a deeply suffering vulnerability:

Moneylenders under this influence [of Fear] have the greatest power, next after them, blackmailers of all kinds, and next after these [two manipulative niche-operatives] eccentrics who may [โ€œbut, not without Graceโ€] blurt or break out [from under the vicious influence and atmosphere of Fear].

Those who have least power [under these secular and graceless and debilitating conditions] in the decline of a State are priests, soldiers, the mothers of many children, the [loyal] lovers of one woman, and saints. (142โ€”my emphasis added)

It was a wise man who said that โ€œthose who are themselves uprooted tend to uproot others.โ€

Hilaire Bellocโ€™s 1911-1912 essay on โ€œThe Decline of the Stateโ€ is certainly resonantly enhanced in its complemetarity and counterpoise with Evelyn Waughโ€™s 1950 vivid historical novel, Helenaโ€”a novel about the times of Emperor Diocletian and Emperor Constantine and a newly germinating and spreading Christianity that Waugh himself so deeply cherished. (It was the only one he ever read aloud to his own beloved children.) Would that we knew whether Hilaire Belloc, who died in July of 1953, read Waughโ€™s moving 1950 novel with its supernatural perspectives on the indispensability of Grace.

In the 1960s, while a military officer in Southeast Asia, I one day somehow formulated to myself a principle about the mysteriously Permissive Acts of Divine Providence that was especially then consoling to me. It was a correlative relative proposition that went like this:

โ€œThe greater the evil that God allows, the greater the good He intends to bring out of it.โ€

The faithful Practical Application of that Principle and Correlative Proposition goes like this:

โ€œTherefore, here and now, I (we) must promptly collaborate with the Divine Intention and thus resourcefully and loyally try to bring about a GREATER good out of what God, and sometimes so mysteriously, has allowed to happenโ€”also in combat and other forms of warfare!โ€

These are difficult principles and codes to live by. But โ€œwe are only as courageous as we are convinced,โ€ as Father John A. Hardon, S.J. himself once solemnly and very supportively said to me.

CODA

Now comes an unforgettably beautiful literary passage: Let us thus now closely consider and gratefully savor St. Helenaโ€™s own cultivated prayers for her son (as well as for others) as offered to the Three Magi on the Feast of the Epiphany. Evelyn Waugh presents them at the end of his penultimate Chapter XI, which is aptly entitled โ€œEpiphany,โ€ from Helena by Evelyn Waugh (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1950), pages 221-224, here, printed for the readerโ€™s sake without indentation:

Everyone in Jerusalem remarked on Helenaโ€™s vigour. The old lady was positively indefatigable, they all said. But in truth she was very weary. Winter set in. The convent was exposed, damp and chill. It was not thus, in Dalmatia, that she had planned her old age. She seemed to have come to the end of her questions. No one was helpful. No one was hopeful. At Christmas she had not the strength to ride out with the procession to Bethlehem. She went to communion in the convent chapel and that day allowed the nuns to make a fuss of her, spending the feast crouched over a wood fire which they lit for her in her room.

But by Twelfth Night she rallied and on the eve set out by litter along the five rough miles to the shrine of the Nativity. There was no throng of pilgrims. [Bishop] Macarius and his people kept Epiphany in their own church. Only the little community of Bethlehem greeted her and led her to the room they had prepared. She rested there dozing until an hour before dawn when they called her and led her out under the stars, then down onto the stable-cave, where they made a place for her on the womenโ€™s side of the small, packed congregation.

The low vault was full of lamps and the air close and still. Silver bells announced the coming of the three vested, bearded monks, who prostrated themselves before the altar. So the long liturgy began.

Helena knew little Greek and her thoughts were not in the words nor anywhere in the immediate scene. She forgot even her quest and was dead to everything except the swaddled child long ago and those three royal sages who had come from so far to adore him.

โ€œThis is my day, she thought, โ€œand these are my kind.โ€

Perhaps she apprehended that her fame, like theirs, would live in one historic act of devotion; that she too had emerged from a kind of โ€˜ฮฟฯ…ฯ„ฮฟฯ€ฮฏฮฑโ€™ [Utopia] or nameless realm and would vanish like them in the sinking nursery fire-light among the picture-books and the dayโ€™s toys.

โ€œLike me,โ€ she said to them, โ€œyou were late in coming. The shepherds were here long before; even the cattle. They had joined the chorus of angels before you were on your way. For you the primordial discipline of the heavens was relaxed and a new defiant light blazed among the disconcerted stars.

โ€œHow laboriously you came, taking sights and calculations, where the shepherds had run barefoot! How odd you looked on the road, attended by what outlandish liveries, laden with such preposterous gifts!

โ€œYou came at length to the final stage of your pilgrimage and the great star stood still above you. What did you do? You stopped to call on King Herod. Deadly exchange of compliments in which there began that unended war of mobs and magistrates against the innocent!

โ€œYet you came, and were not turned away. You too found room at the manger. Your gifts were not needed, but they were accepted and put carefully by, for they were brought with love. In that new order of charity that had just come to life there was room for you too. You were not lower in the eyes of the holy family than the ox or the ass.

โ€œYou are my especial patrons,โ€ said Helena, โ€œand patrons of all late-comers, of all who have had a tedious journey to make to the truth, of all who are confused with knowledge and speculation, of all who through politeness make themselves partners in guilt, of all who stand in danger by reason of their talents.

โ€œDear cousins, pray for me,โ€ said Helena, โ€œand for my poor overloaded son [the Emperor Constantine himself, who was still unbaptized]. May he, too, before the end find kneeling-space in the straw. Pray for the great, lest they perish utterly. And pray for Lactantius and Marcias and the young poets of Trรจves and for the souls of my wild, blind ancestors; for their sly foe Odysseus and for the great Longinus.

โ€œFor His sake who did not reject your curious gifts, pray always for the learned, the oblique, the delicate. Let them not be quite forgotten at the Throne of God when the simple come into their kingdom.โ€

โ€“Finisโ€“ 

ยฉ 2019 and 2022: Robert D. Hickson

1Hilaire Belloc, First and Last (London: Methuen & Co. LTD., 1912โ€”the second edition; 1911 was the first edition), pages 237-242. All further page references will be to the text of the Second Edition, and placed in parentheses above in the main body of this essay.

Share this:

Evelyn Waugh on Saint Edmund Campionโ€™s Life and DeathNovember 30, 2021In “Catholic Church”

The Decline of a State and Power without Grace: Reflections of Hilaire Belloc and Evelyn WaughApril 25, 2019In “Philosophy”

โ€œThat Unended Warโ€ฆAgainst the Innocentโ€: Evelyn Waugh and Father McNabb, O.P.January 8, 2019In “Catholic Church”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on TWO EMPERORS IN TROUBLE AND A MOTHER’S PRAYER FOR HER GROPING SON

THE TRUTHS WE DARE NOT SPEAK IN 2021

The Truths We Dare 

Not Speak in 2021

By: Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

January 3, 2022

As the long year of 2021 finally came to a close, there were several truths Americans on the Left found themselves privately acknowledging but unable to say in public for fear of doing damage to their political cause, their reputations, or their sense of security. But as 2022 advances, it will become even more difficult to hide these truths. 

Collusion, RIP

No one wishes to speak of the โ€œdossierโ€ anymore. Everyone knows why: it was never a dossier. It was always a mishmash concoction of half-baked fantasies and outright lies, sloppily thrown together by the grifter and has-been ex-British spy and Trump hater, Christopher Steeleโ€”all in the pay of Hillary Clinton, the original architect of the collusion hoax. 

Steele himself admitted that he had no sources or notes to substantiate his โ€œresearch.โ€ Most of those who had seeded the dossier around Washington now either agree it was fake, or โ€œpartiallyโ€ false, or remain silent in embarrassment. 

The perpetual NeverTrump revisionism is reduced to โ€œThe Russian Hoax Hoax,โ€ in a pathetic fashion suggesting Putin still colluded with Trump, and such โ€œcollusionโ€ is provable even without the dossier. 

The logic is Orwellian: in 2017-2020 we heard, โ€œBut the dossier shows that โ€ฆ.โ€ In 2020-2021 we heard, โ€œWhoever said the dossier had anything to do with Russian collusion?โ€ 

The FBIโ€”that in part used their paid informant Steeleโ€™s lies to birth FISA warrantsโ€”now disowns it. The entire 22-month, $40-million Mueller charade ended up in tragicomic style with Robert Mueller under oath denying he knew much of anything about either the purveyor of the dossier, Fusion GPS, or the dossier itself. 

James Comey when asked about it and the investigations it spawned, on 245 occasions under oath claimed he lost his memory or had no knowledge of it.

The Russian collusion hoax will go down in history as one of the most shameful examples of Washington, D.C. mass hysteria, and of a concentrated effort to destroy an elected president, in modern American political history.

In the end, we always come back to where we started: Hillary Clinton.

She used the three firewalls of the Democratic National Committee, the Perkins Coie legal firm, and Fusion GPS, to pay Steele, a foreign national, likely barred by law from providing such dirt to a U.S. presidential campaign.

Steele then grabbed Clinton and FBI money and lazily made a few calls to the now-indicted Igor Danchenko, a Russian working in Washington, D.C. at the left-wing Brookings Institution, along with a Clinton crony Charles Dolan doing business in Moscow. Presto, Steele typed up their myths, in scary intelligence white-paper fashion, and passed them off as top-secret โ€œRussian sources.โ€ The dossier became the โ€œproofโ€ needed to show that Trump, in the words of former CIA director John Brennan, was โ€œtreasonousโ€ or, as former Director of National Intelligence General (ret.) James Clapper alleged, was a โ€œRussian asset.โ€

The Russian collusion hoax is now akin to Joe Bidenโ€™s cognitive decline; everyone knows it, but few bother to state the obviousโ€”or rehash their now embarrassing earlier denials.

When the Musical Chairs Music Stops 

Everyone knows the government cannot keep running up astronomical annual deficits. It is piling up a near $30 trillion national debt, printing trillions of dollarsโ€”and hoping to keep inflation down to 7 percent per year. Everyone knows that, and no one wishes to talk, much less do anything, about it. 

Instead, we simply will go on redistributing money, inflating the economy, and hoping that the middle classes are naรฏve enough to believe that their inflated paychecks outpace their greater inflationary costs that, in truth, have more than wiped out all their wage gains. 

When the interest rate hikes invariably comeโ€”the longer we wait, the worse will be the reckoningโ€”we will again know the stagflation of the 1970s and 1980s. 

The only calculus the Democrats weigh is whether they can print their way to a semblance of normality through 2022, in hopes the helium-over-inflated economy blows up only after the elections. 

Who knows, maybe then they can blame Joe Biden in 2023 for empowering them to wreck the economy and losing Congress, as a way of arguing his clear cognitive decline suddenly warrants resignation. 

Spiraling Crimes without Criminals 

Almost every statistic related to violent crime is up. Smash-and-grab has reached tony places like Union Square in San Francisco, Walnut Creek, and Carmel by the Sea. 

Car-jackings are endemic. Gun sales are boomingโ€”among terrified upscale white liberals. 

An entire blame-the victim protocol emergesโ€”drive your oldest car, dress down, hide your jewelry, hire security guards for your person and businessโ€”because mysteriously there are no victimizers or at least none that can be mentioned.

The once-popular, but now discredited BLM has been reduced to a caricature, arguing that such violent crimes are constructs created by white people to jail black people, that Jussie Smollett was innocent and a victim of racism, and that the Waukesha massacre was the apparent start of a needed โ€œrevolution.โ€

Everyone knows that defunding the police failed and dangerously so. The public accepts that the Soros DAs are both incompetent and sinister. People of all classes and races look at crime statistics. They watch internet videos. They compare firsthand experience with robbery, assault, and theft. And they surmise that young black males are disproportionateโ€”in terms of their percentages in the populationโ€”responsible for much of the violent crime wave, from murders to car-jackings to smash-and-grab mass thefts.

The more the media fails to print descriptions of suspects in criminal assaults, the more universities cavalierly violate the federal Clery Act by failing to provide their campus communities needed information about criminal suspectsโ€™ descriptions, and the more big-city mayors and district attorneys deny an epidemic of violent assault, the more the public knows that crime is even worse than what they hear, see, feel, and experience first-hand.

The public also assumes that voicing the truth is deemed โ€œracistโ€ and thus will earn them a doxing or cancelingโ€”and so in Soviet-style keep quiet. We do not dare speak of disproportionate black perpetrators of hate crimes, rare interracial crimes, and the killing of police.

Yet such silence does not hide the truth that cannot be quite smothered. In a recent op-ed, Heather Mac Donald estimated that โ€œA police officer is about 400 times as likely to be killed by a black suspect as an unarmed black is to be killed by a police ยญofficer.โ€

So, we have a crime wave without criminals in the manner we had an SUV on autopilot without a driver that killed six and injured 62 in Waukesha.

Unofficially, the paradox plays out with the upscale blue-city suburbanite still with the BLM sign on his lawn but with a new 12-gauge under the bed, with the BLM hierarchs and their loud enablers living like Patrisse Cullors, Colin Kaepernick, or LeBron James in rich, mostly white areas, with ample walls and security fences and gates.

So, the year ended with a near-record of black-on-black homicides, and a new record of lethal shootingsโ€”of police officers on duty. 

Biden, A Robust 95? 

Everyone knows that Biden may be chronologically 78, but mentally and physically he is at best 95 or more. People sense that he is failing at a geometric rate that makes his ability to last even another year โ€œproblematic.โ€

But no one says much because the nation has never removed a president or, other than Richard Nixon, had a president resign. 

The Left knows that they were on record from 2017-2020 with incessant 25th Amendment coup talk and went so low as to wheel out a Yale psychiatrist to claim Trump was crazy and needed an intervention removal. Their constant haranguing forced Trump to take the Montreal Cognitive Assessmentโ€”which he aced and which Joe Biden most assuredly will not take, nor will be encouraged to take.

Apparently, Bidenโ€™s handlers believe in the next three years he can imitate the last few months of Woodrow Wilsonโ€™s presidency, where the inactive president was kept incommunicado in bed while the wall of his family and close associates deluded the country and lied about Wilsonโ€™s true health condition.

Kamala Harris plays a bad Spiro Agnew. True, she is so incompetent that calls to ask Biden to step down resemble the early voices who asked the same of Nixon but were met with, โ€œSo you want Agnew?โ€ 

But unlike Agnew who resigned in disgrace after pleading nolo contendere to a single charge of tax evasion, Kamala Harris is in no legal jeopardy. And so, the idea of a โ€œPresident Harrisโ€ who is not non compos mentis apparently is more frightening to the public than keeping Joe Biden who is non compos mentis. And thus, talk of Bidenโ€™s diminishing capacity always is interrupted by โ€œSo you want President Harris?โ€ 

In the end, we are left only with such ironies. The Left, which damned John McCain for selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate, is mute about the far less qualified Kamala Harris as an actual vice president. The matters of race and gender preferences that ensured the incompetent Harris her job are now transmogrified into matters of racism that supposedly explain the charges of her critics. 

The Virus is Dead, 

But the Virus Will Never Die! 

We all know the administration has little clue how to deal with COVID-19. We nod that it does and meanwhile scramble in โ€œevery man for himselfโ€ fashion. Who wishes to say or admit that his government has no idea how to stop the virus, but has a great number of ideas about how to weaponize it for political purposes?

Now there are more dead from COVID-19 in Bidenโ€™s tenure than during Trumpโ€™s, despite well over 60 percent of the population being fully vaxxed and 2-yearsโ€™ experience in treating the virus. A 2020-Biden would demand that 2021-Biden be charged with responsibility for well over 400,000 COVID-19 deaths on his watch and thus should resign. 

Everyone knew Biden had no plan, at least not any different from what Trump was doing. His autopilot agenda was simply to claim ownership of the Warp Speed inoculations and assume that by March 2021 COVID was finally burning itself out as it bumped into too many people with prior natural or vaccinated immunity. 

In Bidenโ€™s logic, nature and Trump had stopped COVID-19, but he would credit his inaction and 90-day miracle leadership from Washington. 

Now Biden is a sanctimonious, Oedipus-like figure, the deliverer who cannot stop the plague that in an eerie way exposes his existential flaws. 

So, Delta and then Omicron arrived. Breakthrough cases accompanied both. Suddenly Biden was calling for the states to step up, given โ€œthere is no federal solutionโ€ to the crisis. He meant that vaccinations do not guarantee immunity from COVID infections anymore. 

Masks and social distancing do not stop Omicronโ€™s spread. There is no federal success in supplying easy testing and an array of therapeutics and medicines to the public. 

Like the proverbial cranky โ€œget off my grassโ€ neighbor, an oblivious and irate Biden still ignores the shortage of tests, the value of therapeutics and natural immunity, and the reality of thousands of breakthrough infectionsโ€”caught in his senility warp to croak on about โ€œmasksโ€ and โ€œvaccinations.โ€

In 2020, Biden was attacking Trump as if he were acting under โ€œThe Articles of Confederationโ€ in outsourcing authority to governors to adopt and manage the crisis as they saw best. In 2021 Biden was praising such Trumpist federalism as he renounced his former much ballyhooed federal authority when blasting Trump as an anti-Federalist who followed the Articles of Confederation. 

In the end, Americans are in 2022 where they were at the beginning of the virus in March 2020: 

รผ China has successfully hidden the origins of the COVID. 

รผ The WHO cannot be trusted. 

รผ The CDC, NIH, and NIAID are incompetent and politically weaponized. 

รผ The pharmaceutical industries see relief only in more multi-billion-dollar booster rollouts and $700-a-pill remedies.

รผ Dr. โ€œI am the scienceโ€ Fauci in cyclical fashion is on TV all day.  He claims on Tuesday that what he said on Monday needed updating, intending to say on Wednesday that his correction on Tuesday was also wrong, while he awaits more bookings for Thursdayโ€™s clarificationsโ€”all the while damning the ignorant mob who disseminates supposedly false information. 

The Yearโ€™s Ironies 

At the end of this second terrible year, we are left only with ironies. 

Vaccinations are a must for soldiers and federal employees, but no barrier to entry for 2 million illegal aliens (is breaking the law a way to avoid the mandate?). 

If you are vaxxed, you are safe; but if your antibody level is even higher from natural immunity, you are not? 

If you get COVID, you are on your own, given the government has no idea what affordable pill you should swallow or what protocol you should follow. 

Social distancing and masks are vitalโ€”unless you go out on the street protesting in concert with BLM or are a California official dining at the French Laundry, or a liberal politician getting your hair done.

Those Americans in 2020 who claimed their president was all too real, know now they voted in a president who is all too false. 

Those Americans who thought up every conceivable legal and illegal way of forcing the hated Trump out of office are racking their brains in vain to use those talents to find just one way of easing out their beloved Joe Biden. 

Those Americans, who love the free cash for staying home, fear that the money they got might help to explain why it is now less valuable. 

Those Americans, who claimed moral superiority for their masks and three shotsโ€”and still got COVIDโ€”can not decide whether they were lied to by Donald Trump, lied to by Joe Bidenโ€”or simply lied to themselves. 

Those Americans who praised defunding the police and excused looting, arson, and violence are pondering whether it is better to renounce their idiocy or to stay quiet and take one more carjacking, one more assault, or one more break-inโ€”for the cause.

Those Americans who applauded the disreputable efforts of Michael Avenatti, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Robert Mueller, Adam Schiff, Christopher Steele, and Alexander Vindman to destroy Trump at all costs, got all they wantedโ€”and thereby have all but destroyed the progressive cause, and likely made Donald Trump all the more powerful, the more so they sought to ruin him.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on THE TRUTHS WE DARE NOT SPEAK IN 2021

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Jan. 6: Why have “None of the Suspicious Individuals [like Ray Epps] who Led the Charge… received any attention from Law Enforcement [FBI] Officials, the Mainstream Press, or even Pelosi”?

Jenna Ryan@dotjennaBOMBSHELL: Revolver Investigation Exposes Massive Web Of Unindicted Operatives Who Coordinated Alongside Ray Epps To Turn January 6th Into a Riot https://thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/bombshell-revolver-investigation-exposes-massive-web-unindicted-operatives-coordinated-alongside-ray-epps-turn-january-6th-riot/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttonsvia @gatewaypundit [https://twitter.com/dotjenna/status/1472396337006141443?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw]
David Eugene AndrewsIs retired Marine sergeant Ray Epps suspect number 16 on the FBIโ€™s original โ€œViolence at the United States Capitolโ€ poster? Why was the picture of #suspectnumber16 removed on July 1, 2021? Who is #fencecutterbulwark ? Who is #nwscaffoldcommander? Who is #blackskimask ? Who is #becivilguy ? And who is #towermanmale19 ? Why hasnโ€™t the person who planted the bombs at the Republican and Democrat HQ in DC been caught? A picture shows him using a cell phone. Location data can identify him, can it not? Many unanswered questions. – Linkedin {https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jameswilliamstevenparker_bombshell-revolver-investigation-exposes-activity-6878156957035958272-pzsn]

Roger L. Simon, the co-founder of PJMedia, and editor-at-large for The Epoch Times, seemed to implicitly ask if the January 6 incident might be a “false flag most likely belonge[ing] to the FBI”:

I remembered how, back in the seventies, they seemed to be involved in everything. The joke was that every lefty organization was at least half FBI agents. I didnโ€™t know if that was an exaggeration. Actually, I wasnโ€™t much for organizations, then and now, and didnโ€™t like being a member. But I suspected it was close to the truth.

So I came to a conclusion as I headed close to Nashville that was an early, mostly instinctual version of what has been alleged recently in far more detailโ€”with evidence on offerโ€”by Revolver.News.

The real false flag most likely belonged to the FBI. They were the McGuffin I was looking for.

I donโ€™t mean to brag about this. I donโ€™t think it was a particularly brilliant insight. It was, frankly, Occamโ€™s Razorโ€”the most obvious is true. Nothing else added up.

Moreover, I didnโ€™t do anything about it. It was only a hunch and I had no evidence. I probably should have gone further, but life went on, and I put it away as the fantasy of a onetime detective writer who hadnโ€™t written a mystery in years.

But when I read a few weeks ago on Revolver about these various charactersโ€”Ray Epps, FenceCutter Bulwark, the Scaffold Commander and so forthโ€”and saw the many videos and photographs offered as evidence by their lead writer Darren Beattie of FBI intervention, my mouth dropped open. The blanks in my own fantasy were being filled in.

Did I know what he had written was a hundred percent true? I had no way of knowing but it made sense and I am in no way a conspiracy theorist. (I believe Oswald acted alone from the Texas Schoolbook Depositoryโ€”at least for now.)

If what Beattie says can be proven, if those people can be found and admit their identitiesโ€”Epps may be forced toโ€”it will make a mockery of the nauseating absurdities from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris (Jan. 6 is another 9/11 or Pearl Harbor?) we all had to listen to on the anniversary of the โ€œinsurrection.โ€

What I find fascinating in all this is that our friends in the MSM have taken no interest whatsoever in this,โ€”although it would seem relatively easy for larger organizations to follow upโ€”other than branding the whole thing with their favorite wordโ€”โ€œdebunked.โ€

I canโ€™t say Iโ€™m surprised. What would they get out of it? You donโ€™t win a Pulitzer these days for telling the truth. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/occams-razor-and-my-hunch-about-jan-6_4199156.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2022-01-09&mktids=62d0a3752b4e860bb5e6984d01755221&est=ZcdJ776B91D677KiYmJPu0p42l%2B6JmLOvVRata83r6GyxFuFPggXf%2FjKUIcT]

The Gateway Pundit summed up The Epoch Times editor’s speculation in three paragraphs:

Revolverโ€™s latest investigation breaks down the timeline of events on 1/6 and highlights the network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been at work either with or in response to Ray Epps during the initial breach into Capitol grounds.

Unsurprisingly, none of the suspicious individuals who led the charge have received any attentionfrom law enforcement officials, the mainstream press, or even Pelosiโ€™s sham witch hunt committee, despite mounting video evidence of their coordinated and indispensable roles in starting the incident at the Capitol.

The new report again centers around the suspicious actions of Ray Epps, who is proving to be more involved than even originally thought, but he doesnโ€™t seem to have been acting alone. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/bombshell-revolver-investigation-exposes-massive-web-unindicted-operatives-coordinated-alongside-ray-epps-turn-january-6th-riot/]

Please read the Revolver’s investigative piece. Here is a part the important investigative piece to wet your appetite:

Out of all of the thousands of January 6โ€™s protesters, and the thousands of hours of publicly available footage from that fateful day, Ray Epps has turned out to be perhaps the only person nailed dead to rights confessing on camera to plotting a pre-planned attack on the Capitol. On both January 5 and January 6, Epps announced multiple times, at multiple locations, his upcoming plot to breach the US Capitol. He then spent hours attempting to recruit hundreds of others to join him. On top of it all, Epps was seen leading key people and managing key aspects of the initial breach of the Capitol grounds himself.

It would be one thing if Eppsโ€™s repeated calls on January 5 to โ€œgo into the Capitolโ€ had simply amounted to bluster. But Epps followed through on his stated mission to shepherd others inside. In clips 4-6 of the above compilation, we see Epps actively orchestrate elements of the very first breach of the Capitol barricades at 12:50 p.m, while Trump still had 20 minutes left in his rally speech.

It is noteworthy that this Ray Epps breach occurs just one minute after Capitol Police began responding to reports of two โ€œpipe bombsโ€ located at DNC and GOP headquarters, respectively. Rather conveniently, the already-handicapped Capitol Police thus had still-fewer resources with which to respond to the barricade breach in question.

While the โ€œpipe bombsโ€ turned out to be a dud, the Ray Epps breach proved fateful. Today, the official stories told by the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the US Justice Department all depict the apparent Ray Epps-orchestrated 12:50 p.m. initial breach of metal barricades as the โ€œBig Bangโ€ event of January 6.

In large part, this description is hardly an exaggeration. Indeed, it was the 12:50 p.m. breach of the Capitol grounds, in conjunction with a handful of suspicious individuals ripping down fencing and signage, that set in motion the conditions allowing for 1/6 to turn from a rally into a riot. 

In this report, we will blow open this network of still-unindicted key operators who appear to have been at work either with or around Ray Epps during the initial Capitol grounds breach. You, dear reader, will be scandalized โ€” though perhaps unsurprised โ€” to learn that none of the actors covered in this report have received attention in the mainstream press, despite their active and indispensable roles in the events of 1/6.

As we explained in detail in our previous report, the FBI originally put Ray Eppsโ€™s face on its Capitol Violence โ€œMost Wanted Listโ€ on January 8, 2021, just two days after 1/6. They offered a cash reward for information leading to his arrest. In fact, rank-and-file FBI agents initially deemed Eppsโ€™s role as an apparent riot organizer so important that they named him Suspect #16โ€”one of the first 20 high-profile FBI targets in a database now packed with more than 500 suspects.

Then, six months later on June 30, 2021, both Revolver News and The New York Times published inconvenient stories that encouraged a more aggressive interrogation of the โ€œRay Epps third rail,โ€ leading reasonable people to wonder why this publicly identified man on the Most Wanted List still had no charges filed against him.

The FBI responded to these important media stories the very next day. But their response was to quietly purge all online Ray Epps files from their website, then switch to a posture of โ€œWhat? Who? Ray Epps? Never heard of him.โ€

Agents of the FBI Field Office in Phoenix (where Epps lives) have gone so far as to explicitly deny knowledge that Ray Epps even exists. Instead of pursuing Epps, FBI agents have instead pursued journalists who had the temerity to ask Epps in person if he was a government operative. โ€œI understand that, but I canโ€™t say anything,โ€ is all Epps would tell them.

Hereโ€™s a quick visual synopsis of this timeline:

The sham Congressional January 6 Commission seems to be going along with the charade of Ray Epps denialism. For all of its recent gesticulations about Mark Meadowsโ€™s benign text messages, the Commission has yet to express even a basic interest in Ray Epps or his communications leading up to and on January 6.

But the specter of Ray Epps, and the ominous questions his immunity raises, loom too large to be memory-holed by poorly coordinated efforts of government denial. In light of the above, it is both amusing and symbolically appropriate that despite the FBIโ€™s attempt to purge Eppsโ€™s face from its โ€œWantedโ€ database (and public denials of his existence from authorized agents), the FBI DC Field Office still features Ray Epps as a โ€œWantedโ€ man in its current pinned Twitter image (look closely and youโ€™ll find it).If Epps turns out to have been some kind of government operative, which at present is the only clean and simple explanation for his immunity, it is game over for the official โ€œMAGA insurrectionโ€ narrative of 1/6. Epps was the dayโ€™s loudest riot recruiter, and its apparent leader of the very first breach of Capitol grounds. [https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/]

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chรกvez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by โ€œOne of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1 – A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1 What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1] 
Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on UNANSWERED QUESTIONS