NOTRE DAME UNIVERITY AND THE CATHOLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION CONTINUE TO CEASE TO BE CATHOLIC

!!!!

Cardinal Newman Society Sends Letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

Notre Dame, CHA Push Dangerous Compromise on Religious Liberty

Cardinal Newman Society Sends Letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

The Cardinal Newman Society sent letters yesterday, December 20, to the Obama Administration and leading Catholic bishops, raising serious concerns about a proposal made by the University of Notre Dame and the Catholic Health Association that could undermine the religious liberty of many Catholic colleges and universities.

At issue is the controversial Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate requiring health insurance plans to cover sterilization and contraceptives, including some that cause abortion.  The regulation gives HHS discretion to exempt churches and church-related organizations that serve and hire primarily members of the same faith, but the exemption does not appear to include most religious colleges, schools, hospitals, charities and other organizations.

In public letters to the Obama Administration, both the Catholic Health Association (CHA) and Fr. John Jenkins of the University of Notre Dame have pointed to Section 414(e) of the IRS Code, which exempts church-related pension plans from the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).  They recommend the language in 414(e) as an improvement over the strict and narrow religious exemption published by HHS.

But yesterday The Cardinal Newman Society told Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that the proposed revision:

…would mean leaving many Catholic colleges and universities unprotected, just like the flawed religious exemption it is intended to replace. …We continue to urge you to repeal the mandate altogether, or at minimum to protect the consciences of all individuals and organizations that oppose sterilization, contraception or abortion because of their religious beliefs.

The Society’s concerns were repeated in letters to Archbishop Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), and Bishop William Lori, chairman of the USCCB committee on religious liberty.

Language similar to the 414(e) rule would only marginally expand the current HHS exemption and would undermine religious liberty.  Under Section 414(e), exemption from federal law is available only to an organization that is “controlled by or associated with a church or a convention or association of churches,” meaning that the organization must at least share “common religious bonds and convictions with [its] church or convention or association of churches.”  In 2001 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit said that three factors bear primary consideration when deciding whether an organization shares “common religious bonds and convictions” with a church:

1) whether the religious institution plays any official role in the governance of the organization; 2) whether the organization receives assistance from the religious institution; and 3) whether a denominational requirement exists for any employee or patient/customer of the organization.

The Fourth Circuit set a precedent that has been followed by other federal courts, and it is not a test that most Catholic colleges and universities are likely to meet.  Many are unaffiliated with a religious order; indeed, some of the most faithfully Catholic colleges are entirely lay-controlled.  Few impose religious tests when hiring employees or accepting students.  It is even an open question as to whether Notre Dame would meet the criteria for a 414(e) exemption; on the Cardinal Newman Society blog Campus Notes, Matthew Archbold reports that Notre Dame spokesman Dennis Brown acknowledged that the university has never actually sought exemption under 414(e).

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops argued against the 414(e) option in its September 17th comment to HHS: “…[S]uch an exemption would be inadequate, because it would fail to protect many stakeholders with a moral or religious objection to contraceptives or sterilization, including individuals, insurers, and even many religiously affiliated organizations.”

Other Christian organizations that are inter-denominational or non-denominational could also have problems with language similar to the 414(e) rule, because it exempts only religious organizations with denominational affiliations.  Dr. Paul Corts, President of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities, explained to The Cardinal Newman Society:

While some of our institutions are affiliated with larger church organizational or denominational structures, many are independent religious organizations.  They are religious not because they are associated with a church or denomination but rather because of their legitimate religious beliefs and practices that are openly held out to the public as such—the critical legal characteristics of a religious entity—and yet, would not be recognized as such under an exemption requiring conformity with the requirements of IRS Code Section 414(e).

In an op-ed today in The Washington Times, Cardinal Newman Society President Patrick J. Reilly writes that the practical effect of the Notre Dame and CHA proposal “would be to slam the door on most religious organizations while providing political cover to the Obama Administration.”  But he also recalls that neither the University of Notre Dame nor CHA:

…is a stranger to controversy when it comes to President Barack Obama and his support for abortion rights. Notre Dame ignored the public pleas of 83 bishops when it honored the president at its commencement ceremony in 2009, and CHA president Sister Carol Keehan was a key supporter of the Obama health care reform law while the Catholic bishops opposed it because of abortion concerns.

The full Cardinal Newman Society letter to Secretary Sebelius is below.

——————–

December 20, 2011

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius
Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 120F
Washington, DC 20201

Dear Secretary Sebelius:

We are writing with concern about the dangerous implications of a proposal that has been presented to you by the University of Notre Dame and the Catholic Health Association, which could violate the religious liberty of the faithful Catholic colleges and universities that The Cardinal Newman Society promotes to Catholic families.

As you know, many religious organizations have sought the repeal of the Interim Final Rule on Preventive Services published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 46621), which mandates health insurance coverage for sterilization and contraceptives, including some that cause abortions.  At the least, religious organizations and individuals seek conscience protection to be exempted from this mandate.

The Cardinal Newman Society, which works to help renew and strengthen the Catholic identity of Catholic colleges and universities, is especially concerned about the impact of this mandate on Catholic higher education.  As we noted in our September 29th comment to your department, joined by 18 Catholic colleges and universities and the chairman of the U.S. bishops’ committee on Catholic education: “No federal rule has defined being “religious” as narrowly and discriminatorily as the Mandate appears to do, and no regulation has ever so directly proposed to violate plain statutory and constitutional religious freedoms.”  Of great concern is the impact on Catholic college health plans for students, which are not currently exempt from the regulation.

The religious exemption in the regulations is inadequate, but so is the replacement proposed by the University of Notre Dame and the Catholic Health Association in their own comments to your department.  They propose language similar to Internal Revenue Service Code Section 414(e), which describes organizations exempt from provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.  Embracing 414(e)-like language would mean leaving many Catholic colleges unprotected, just like the flawed religious exemption it is intended to replace.

A religious exemption similar to 414(e) would only marginally expand the current HHS exemption and would undermine religious liberty.  Under the 414(e) rule, exemption is available only to an organization that is “controlled by or associated with a church or a convention or association of churches,” meaning that the organization must at least share “common religious bonds and convictions with [its] church or convention or association of churches.”  In 2001 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit said that three factors bear primary consideration when deciding whether an organization shares “common religious bonds and convictions” with a church:

1) whether the religious institution plays any official role in the governance of the organization; 2) whether the organization receives assistance from the religious institution; and 3) whether a denominational requirement exists for any employee or patient/customer of the organization.

The Fourth Circuit set a precedent that has been followed by other federal courts, and it is not a test that most Catholic colleges and universities are likely to meet.  Many are unaffiliated with a religious order; indeed, some of the most faithfully Catholic colleges are entirely lay-controlled.  Few impose religious tests when hiring employees or accepting students.  It is even an open question as to whether Notre Dame would meet the criteria for a 414(e) exemption, which the university has never sought, according to Notre Dame spokesman Dennis Brown.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops argued against the 414(e) option in its September 17th comment to your department: “…[S]uch an exemption would be inadequate, because it would fail to protect many stakeholders with a moral or religious objection to contraceptives or sterilization, including individuals, insurers, and even many religiously affiliated organizations.”

While our mission relates to Catholic education, we also support the concerns of religious organizations that are inter-denominational or non-denominational.  As explained by Dr. Paul Corts, President of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities, in a note to The Cardinal Newman Society yesterday: “While some of our institutions… are religious not because they are associated with a church or denomination but rather because of their legitimate religious beliefs and practices that are openly held out to the public as such—the critical legal characteristics of a religious entity—and yet, would not be recognized as such under an exemption requiring conformity with the requirements of IRS Code Section 414(e).”

Secretary Sebelius, the fact is that the 414(e) language would fail to protect the religious liberty of too many religious organizations that object to sterilization, contraception or abortion, including many faithful Catholic colleges and universities.  This is unacceptable.

We continue to urge you to repeal the mandate altogether, or at minimum to protect the consciences of all individuals and organizations that oppose sterilization, contraception or abortion because of their religious beliefs.

Sincerely,

Patrick J. Reilly
President

cc:        Joshua DuBois, Executive Director, Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Enterprises

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in CATHOLIC HIGHER EDUCATION, FREEDOM OF RELIGION, LIBERALISM, LIFE ISSUES, MORAL RELATIVISM, POLITICAL LIFE IN AMERICA, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to NOTRE DAME UNIVERITY AND THE CATHOLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION CONTINUE TO CEASE TO BE CATHOLIC

  1. anselmusjmj says:

    I am reminded of the divinely inspired words from Luke 18:8 ……

    “But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?”

    Hopefully, the answer to the question will be “yes,” but maybe things aren’t panning out that way!

  2. Ignatius Martinus says:

    The Carthusian warcry, “Stat crux dum volvitur orbis”, comes to mind. “The Cross stands firm while the world moves on”. This is how we should fight our fight.

  3. Curt Stoller says:

    The Obama Administration would like nothing better than to drive all Catholics and Christians out of the medical profession. Then the dirty little work of abortionists could continue without any witnesses or protests. To anyone listening at the USCCB, I give you the words of Blessed Clemens August von Galen, Bishop of Munster during the Nazi Holocaust:

    “Become hard! Remain firm! At this moment we are the anvil rather than the hammer. Other men, strangers, renegades, are hammering us . . . The anvil cannot and need not strike back: it must only be firm, only hard! . . . However hard the hammer strikes, the anvil stands firmly and silently in place and will long continue to shape the objects forged upon it. If it is sufficiently tough and firm and hard the anvil will last longer than the hammer.”

    American Catholic Bishops: Please come out stronger and more forcefully against abortion! Don’t wait for consensus amongst yourselves. This didn’t work for the Deutsche Bischofskonferenz at the time of Hitler. And it won’t work now while millions of innocent children are being killed in this country every year by abortion. Become hard. Remain firm.

Comments are closed.