The LGBT Political Campaign Behind Pope Francis’ ElectionInboxxRichard StokesSat, May 11, 10:59 PM (17 hours ago)to Richard

The LGBT Political Campaign Behind Pope Francis’ Election

Saturday, May 11, 2019
The LGBT Political Campaign Behind Pope Francis’ Election

By David Martin 
With theologians and bishops aghast over what some are calling ‘the most terrible schism the world has ever seen,’ it behooves the Catholic hierarchy to take a closer look at the 2013 papal election since it appears to have raised to the Chair of Peter “a man, not canonically elected.” 

To recap, on the eve of the 2013 conclave, Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez Maradiaga who was one of the key kingmakers for the papal election was busily on the phone with cardinal electors from the Honduran embassy in Rome. His frenzied phone effort was the tail end of an intense lobbying campaign to secure votes for the election of Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio as pope. 

That same day, Maradiaga attended a private meeting of Bergoglio supporters, which included key players in the “St. Gallen Mafia,” and together they garnered pledges for up to twenty-five votes for Bergoglio. Not surprisingly, Bergoglio opened with twenty-six votes on the first day of the conclave, though that number would rise to 77 on the second day indicating that this campaign effort was gaining ground. Three days later the newly elected Pope Francis asked Maradiaga to head his powerful new Council of Cardinals, known as the “Council of Nine.”

Six years later, the pope and his “vice pope” are accused of perpetuating “one of the worst crises in the history of the Catholic Church.” A recent open letteraddressed to the bishops of the Church accuses Pope Francis of being “guilty of the crime of heresy” and alleges that “Pope Francis has protected and promoted homosexually active clerics and clerical apologists for homosexual activity” indicating “he believes that homosexual activity is not gravely sinful.”

The letter cites the papal favour enjoyed by Maradiaga, a revolutionary accused of covering up for homosexual bishop Juan José Pineda Fasquelle. Pineda was forced to resign amidst allegations that he sexually abused seminarians and embezzled over $1.3 million to “pay for sexual favours” and “maintain a network” of gay-lovers. Reports have it that Maradiaga has brutally ruined the careers of at least six priests who spoke out against Pineda.
Fruits of Vote Canvassing

Hence Franciswho has abetted anti-life forces, betrayed the underground Church in China, sacked loyal priests, empowered homosexuals, rewarded abortionists, praised Luther, blessed adultery, denied the miracle of the loaves, and professed manifold heresy — occupies the Papal Chair today because of this LGBT canvassing campaign that made the difference in determining the outcome of the 2013 papal election. On August 27, 2018, Vatican correspondent Edward Pentin tweeted concerning this political campaign.

“Cdls Danneels & Ex-Cdl McCarrick campaigned for Bergoglio to be Pope, as did ++Maradiaga on eve of Conclave, phoning up various cardinals from the Honduran embassy in Rome. Despite their pasts, all 3 prelates have since been special advisors of Francis or rehabilitated by him.”
As we know, the late Cardinal Danneels was a public advocate of “gay marriage” and McCarrick was defrocked of his bishopric last February after being indicted for homosexual predation of seminarians and for covering up the sexual-abuse of numerous seminarians perpetrated by some 300 priests under his jurisdiction. 

San Gallen’s Mafia

Danneels confessed on video in September 2015 that he and several cardinals were part of the notorious St. Gallen’s Mafia that had conspired for the ouster of Benedict XVI and the election of Cardinal Bergoglio, and it was this very group that culminated its campaign effort just before 2013 conclave, showing clearly that conspiracy played a key role in the outcome of the election. Danneel’s confession alone stands as irrefutable evidence.  

Austen Ivereigh’s book, The Great Reformer, brings to light how Cardinal Murphy O’Connor (a homosexual) along with several key cardinals had spearheaded this intense lobbying campaign, through which they secured pledges from nearly 30 cardinals to get Cardinal Bergoglio elected as pope.

According to Ivereigh, “they first secured Bergoglio’s assent” and then “they got to work, touring the cardinals’ dinners to promote their man.” This was confirmed, in the case of Cardinals Murphy-O’Connor and Cardinal O’Malley, in the Wall Street Journal report from August 6, 2013. As the conclave neared, they held a series of closed meetings, known as congregations, one of which featured Cardinal Bergoglio as the keynote speaker, thereby proving that Bergoglio was colluding in this plan. 

Ecclesiastical Law Violated

The foregoing warrants episcopal inquisition into Pope Francis’ election since it contained multi-violations against Pope John Paul II’s Apostolic Constitution Unversi Dominici Gregis, whichgoverns papal elections. 
The Constitution makes it clear that political vote canvassing on the part of cardinal electors is forbidden and incurs automatic excommunication upon those involved. Consider the following. 

“The Cardinal electors shall further abstain from any form of pact, agreement, promise or other commitment of any kind which could oblige them to give or deny their vote to a person or persons. If this were in fact done, even under oath, I decree that such a commitment shall be null and void and that no one shall be bound to observe it; and I hereby impose the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae upon those who violate this prohibition. (81)

Unwritten Rule

While the pope here speaks of the election itself, we should not rule out that this prohibition also applies to that time before the election when preparations are underway, since it is during this time that illicit political activity would exert its greatest influence on the vote. “Any form of pact” obliging electors “to give or deny their vote to a person” would be secured before the election. 

We should also consider that violations not mentioned in the Constitution could also criminalize the election. Crimes like extortion or LGBT bribery committed before the election would certainly render the election illicit if their influence carried into the election. 

The pope also says in his Constitution:

“Confirming the prescriptions of my Predecessors, I likewise forbid anyone, even if he is a Cardinal, during the Pope’s lifetime and without having consulted him, to make plans concerning the election of his successor, or to promise votes, or to make decisions in this regard in private gatherings.” (79)

A clique of cardinals did “make plans” to force Benedict XVI’s resignation and to campaign for “the election of his successor,” with up to 25 cardinals “promising votes” the day before the election, this having come about through “private gatherings,” thus revealing the illicit conduct of those cardinal electors to be.

Under the pain of excommunication latae sententiae, the pope forbids “each and every Cardinal elector, present and future, as also the Secretary of the College of Cardinals and all other persons taking part in the preparation and carrying out of everything necessary for the election” to allow “all possible forms of interference, opposition and suggestion whereby secular authorities of whatever order and degree, or any individual or group, might attempt to exercise influence on the election of the Pope.” (80)

It was through Judas cardinals that are allied with the infamous LGBT network and who were “taking part in the preparation” of the election that the secular powers were enabled to “exercise influence on the election of the pope.”

Section 76 of John Paul II’s Constitution states 

“Should the election take place in a way other than that prescribed in the present Constitution, or should the conditions laid down here not be observed, the election is for this very reason null and void, without any need for a declaration on the matter; consequently, it confers no right on the one elected.” (76)

There is much being said at this time concerning Francis’ errors and heterodoxy but little is said concerning the election that launched his revolution. Has it not occurred to Catholics that his election could have been null?

It indeed behooves the Church’s episcopal body to take a closer look at the 2013 papal election, since we may very well be witnessing the fulfillment of the prophecy of St. Francis of Assisi concerning a false shepherd. 

“At the time of this tribulation, a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavour to draw many into error…. Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true pastor, but a destroyer.” (1226) 

(Taken from Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis of Assisi, R. Washbourne Publishing House, 1882, pp. 248-250, with imprimatur by His Excellency William Bernard, Bishop of Birmingham) 5 comments:<img src=”//” width=”35″ height=”35″ class=”photo” alt=””>Tancred said… AnonymousMay 10, 2019 at 2:32 PM
Under the pain of excommunication latae sententiae, the pope forbids “each and every Cardinal elector, present and future, as also the Secretary of the College of Cardinals and all other persons taking part in the preparation and carrying out of everything necessary for the election” to allow “all possible forms of interference, opposition and suggestion whereby secular authorities of whatever order and degree, or any individual or group, might attempt to exercise influence on the election of the Pope.” (80)

Oh, Mr. Martin, don’t you know? JP2 just put that in there in case a non-VC2 conforming pope (like Trump) somehow got elected. The law doesn’t apply to the Obamas, Clintons, Podestas, opus devil FBI/CIA/Bannon perjurers etc. If you don’t believe me, just look at the bishops Francis has removed for covering up pedophilia or sodomy–most have been conservative.


David MartinMay 10, 2019 at 3:07 PM
Not so, it’s the other way around. He was setting up road blocks to prevent the very harassment he received from Cdl Martini’s “Mafia” gang–the same harassment that forced Benedict’s abdication and opened the way for Bergoglio, who Martini loved.


AnonymousMay 11, 2019 at 4:13 AM
It is true that Martini was against JPII, even though it was that Pope who raised him from obscurity as a Jesuit professor to be Archbishop of Milan, and a Cardinal.
And it was definitely true that Martini and company were 100% against Benedict XVI. Were he not ill with Parkinson’s himself n 2005, Martini wanted to be Pope, but knew that he was declining rapidly. So he supported a man even more radical than himself, and gathered other like minded Cardinals to support that man ….Bergoglio (who finished 2nd in 2005 conclave behind the hated Benedict XVI).

Unfortunatly, Benedict XVI was too much of a jellyfish to clamp down hard on them during his seven year reign. He should have sacked the lot of them. Martini died in 2012, after telling Benedict XVI it was time for him(Benedict) to go. But the radicals were now ready to put their man into the Throne of Saint Peter…Bergoglio. And we have suffered ever since.

Pope Francis was not canonically elected. This story, as well as the recent letter about his heresies, should be investigated by Cardinals and Bishops, and bring Francis and his people down and out.
Is it possible? Yes. Will it happen? Most people say no…..but there comes a point when “enough is enough”…..and I think that time is here. Don’t be surprised if behind the scenes, there is a growing movement of even important Cardinals, to do to Francis what his supporters did to Benedict XVI….a “coup” to force him 

May 11, 2019 at 6:22 PM <img src=”//” width=”35″ height=”35″ class=”photo” alt=””>Tancred said… AnonymousMay 11, 2019 at 6:37 AM
You have swallowed hook, line and sinker the dialectic the two VC2 camps, “communio” and “concilium,” have created for you. Unfortunately, they are both going in the same direction to the same destination–you and all you influence along w/them. 

You willfully ignore all the evidence that contradicts your position. So go: kiss the koran! Get the Hindu dot! Hide the crucifix and tell Jews they have a separate covenant w/God. Tell the Lutherans Luther was right you don’t have to love God (the first & greatest commandment): have faith and sin boldly! Never convert anyone nor even mention conversion to your closest Jewish friend. Promote the U.N. of man rather than the Gospel message of Jesus Christ. Preside over masses in which naked women present gifts & serve as lectors and invent the Theology of the Body (the corrupt, condemned to death by original sin body destined for dust–not the Theology of Christ). Promote sodomites and pedophiles,sex ed of children and equality for women (altar girls and all the jobs in the parish, Jesus Christ as a woman at World Youth Day Denver 1993) all the while saying you are against abortion like “Mother” Teresa who never spoke against abortion in Calcutta the abortion capital of the world. Then corrupt the inside of the Vatican w/your drink and by ‘escaping’ in secular dress and winking together to hide your secret life from all those “conservatives” who do the same as you do. 

Name yourself after John 23 and Paul 6 who started a new church–the counter syllabus.

Ignore that if you are not possessed by the Holy Ghost and don’t possess your vessel in sanctity then you are possessed by and in communio w/the Devil: “One overt signal of occult infiltration in the Catholic Church came through a painting. In 1970 a German Lutheran received permission from Pope Paul VI to observe him during papal audiences in order to paint his portrait. Ernst Günter Hansing presented the Pope with the finished portrait in 1972. It was published in full color in the April 1972 edition of the Smithsonian, together with Paul VI’s cryptic commentary: the Pope stated that the portrait is “a mirror of the situation in the Church today,” and furthermore that “one almost needs a new philosophy to grasp the meaning of it’s context.””

But know you risk your own soul and all you come in contact with. You cannot judge the hearts of these popes. They have gone to their eternal reward and are in the hands of God. What a mission (?) to look at the destruction they have wrought (see paul 6 w/his upside down bloody knife and then look at the destruction of souls around you; of Notre Dame–after destruction intent to rebuild w/a minaret)) and attempt to defend them by saying that’s not what they intended (when none of us can know that)! 

When a secular building is unsafe, it is condemned and eventually demolished so that no-one will get hurt. Why do you not look at the unsafe VC2 Church and condemn it so that you will lead no-one (especially yourself) to hell? I can tell you what God will do to the VC2 church because He did the same to the Jewish Temple. God sent the Catholic Church to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to baptize every nation in the name of the Trinity, to bring God to man in the sacraments and thereby serve as a vehicle to save souls and glorify God. The intent of JP2 was expressed at Assisi–it is no different than Francis’ intent. It is VC2’s intent.

“And whosoever shall fall on this stone, shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder.” May 11, 2019 at 6:24 PM <img src=”//” width=”35″ height=”35″ class=”photo” alt=””>Tancred said… 

ConstantineMay 11, 2019 at 7:46 AM
The teaching of the CATHOLIC Church is that the body is a sacred creation of God, that it was made perfect, but that Original Sin marred the beauty of that Creation. The same body will rise again in a glorified state on Judgement Day. God loves the bidies He chose for us, and we should live it and take care of it, so that it reflects God’s intentions. The same goes for His Church. Our work is to resanctify His Creation, not tear it down.


A voice that cries in the desert…May 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM
The conclave that “elected” Bergoglio should have never convened to begin with. Why? Because Benedict XVI’s resignation to the papacy was invalid according to the canon that regulates the act of resignation from a Pope. Therefore, if Benedict XVI’s resignation is null, and there cannot be two popes, then Bergoglio could havve never been a legitimate Pope.


Michael DowdMay 11, 2019 at 11:02 AM
There is ample evidence now that Pope (?) Francis is both a heretic and a usurper. A formal inquiry should be opened. Unfortunately, this highly unlikely given the lack of faith and courage by the hierarchy. Accordingly, it might be in the best interests of the Church to encourage and strongly support a schism.

Doing this would help the worldly backers of Pope F. realize there were relatively few Catholics in the world who supported him and that those who were most serious about their faith were trying to get rid of him or break away, they (Soros, Obama, Democrats, UN, EU, etc) would withdraw their financial support from him.


David MartinMay 11, 2019 at 1:06 PM
Re: “Voice that cries in the desert.” Good point. Every indication is that Pope Benedict, while having consented to step down, never renounced his papal office (munus). 

On the eve of his resignation, he said: “Anyone who accepts the Petrine ministry no longer has any privacy. He belongs always and completely to everyone, to the whole Church… “The ‘always’ is also a “forever” – there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this.” (General Audience, February 27, 2013)

From these words it appears that there has been no revocation of Benedict XVI’s office. According to Church law, a pope must give up “his office” for his resignation to be valid. (Canon 332) The text indicates that Benedict XVI chose to retain his office “forever,” which means he is still pope, which means that Francis cannot be pope, since there cannot be two popes. If Francis is the pope, then Benedict’s office is revoked, but Benedict insists it was not revoked.

ReplyDelete May 11, 2019 at 6:24 PM <img src=”//” width=”35″ height=”35″ class=”photo” alt=””>Tancred said… 
Rescued by MaryMay 11, 2019 at 2:09 PM
Homos Coming Out of Your Noses

Dear Catholics,

You have a pep rally for the Ten Commandments, but yet you have forsaken the law of the Lord.

You have turned your ear away from hearing the very law you now claim to profess. Your prayers are an abomination.

I, Myself have mingled this perverse spirit among you, saith the Lord.

As the children of Moses grumbled and longed for the fresh meat of Egypt, as they wandered in the desert; not satisfied with the mana from heaven. So I sent them quail for meat, till it came out from their noses.

So you, not being fulfilled with My Heavenly Bread.

You would rather have adultery instead…!!!

This scourge of sodomy that has befallen your land is itself the judgement of God against you, ‘oh harlot Church…!!!

And now you have homos coming out of your noses…

“The LORD hath mingled a perverse spirit in the midst thereof: and they have caused Egypt to err in every work thereof, as a drunken man staggereth in his vomit.”

You march people up the aisle and pronounce them man and wife, while they have a living spouse.

And then come and stand in My house, which is called by My Name and say:

We are delivered to do our abominations…!!!

The Hand of the Lord is against you.!

You want Me to remove the sodomites from among you…?

Ha.!! I mock you.! I ridicule you.!

I will have you in derision…

Why, you cry…!??

Because you have hardened your heart against the wife of your youth.

That’s why..!

The sluts and faggots will enter the kingdom of God before you.!!


Knights of the White Washed Sepulcher…!!

Rend your hearts and not your garments.
Turn to Me with your whole hearts with Godly penance for YOUR sins against My Indissolubility.

Then I will heal your Church…


May 11, 2019 at 6:25 PM <img src=”//” width=”35″ height=”35″ class=”photo” alt=””>Tancred said… 

David MartinMay 11, 2019 at 3:12 PM
Simplicity of speech is much preferred, but feigning prophecy is not of God.

There hasn’t been any “pep rally” for the ten commandments, since they openly defy them even, saying, “Conscience now recognizes that we can break the commandments.” (Amoris Laetitia, 303)

And don’t forget, “the sluts and faggots” are the very perpetrators of this abomination, which means they will be slung from the Kingdom and not entered in, though yes, they have an easier time entering before the clergy who mislead them.

And don’t forget too, that there are worse things than adultery, like heresy, and the infamous “Charismatic Movement” — a Satanic deception that is perverting the Church. They call upon the “spirit” but they are calling down demons. 

God’s spirit is with the humble and simple.


Peter WatsonMay 11, 2019 at 4:30 PM
This lot would keep Sigmund and collaborators years to process.


AnonymousMay 11, 2019 at 6:09 PM
Aren’t they all sodomites according to Vigano–just of different factions? So wouldn’t whomever was elected be a sodomite elected by sodomites? You can’t dig yourself out of a pit w/lies. You opus devils just follow Francis’ example–shouting sodomy to try to rid yourselves of your earthly enemies, while saying nothing regarding their (or your own) apostasy. Like I said at the get go: it is not those who cry for the new order mass exclusively that are the enemy. It’s you lukewarm who willingly pinch incense to every God in the pantheon and don’t mind coexistence as long as you have your little corners where you pretend to worship Jesus Christ (who wants to save souls; now watch you all worships yourselves).
May 11, 2019 at 6:26 PM 
Attachments areaPreview YouTube video The Crucifixion of the Catholic ChurchThe Crucifixion of the Catholic Church

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.