TRY TO IMAGINE A JESUIT POPE SELLING OUT THE FAITHFUL CHINESE CATHOLICS TO THE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT THAT HAS PERSECUTED THEM. IT IS BEYOND IMAGINING, IT IS HAPPENING

Settimo Cielodi Sandro Magister

Danger of Schism in China. Cardinal Zen: “The Pope Told Me…”

Zen

> Italiano
> English

> All the articles of Settimo Cielo in English

*

The open letter reproduced in its entirety below was published today, Monday, January 29, by Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun, bishop emeritus of Hong Kong, on his blog, and was immediately republished by the agency Asia News of the Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions.

In it, the cardinal reveals the essential contents of a conversation he had with Pope Francis, to whom he revealed his grave fears over the steps taken recently in China by Vatican representatives.

These steps consisted in asking two “underground” bishops who are recognized by the Holy See, those of Shantou and Mindong, to make way for two bishops appointed by the government, both illicit and, the first one, excommunicated.

For more details on these steps:

> The Vatican asks legitimate bishops to step aside in favour of illegitimate ones

Cardinale Zen now reveals that Pope Francis replied to him that he had given the order “not to create another Mindszenty case,” alluding to the heroic cardinal and primate of Hungary who was required by the Vatican authorities to leave his country in 1971, was removed from his position in 1973, and in 1975 was replaced with a new primate favored by the communist regime.

But now it’s the cardinal’s turn.

*
Dear Friends in the Media,

Since AsiaNews has revealed some recent facts in the Church in mainland China, of legitimate bishops being asked by the “Holy See” to resign and make place for illegitimate, even explicitly excommunicated, “bishops”, many different versions of the facts and interpretations are creating confusion among the people. Many, knowing of my recent trip to Rome, are asking me for some clarification.

Back in October, when Bishop Zhuang received the first communication from the Holy See and asked me for help, I send someone to bring his letter to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, with, enclosed, a copy for the Holy Father. I don’t know if that enclosed copy reached the desk of the Holy Father.

Fortunately, Archbishop Savio Hon Tai Fai was still in Rome and could meet the Pope in a fare-well visit. In that occasion, he brought the two cases of Shantou and Mindong to the knowledge of the Holy Father. The Holy Father was surprised and promised to look into the matter.

Given the words of the Holy Father to Archbishop Savio Hon, the new facts in December were all the more a shocking surprise to me. When the old distressed Bishop Zhuang asked me to bring to the Holy Father his answer to the message conveyed to him by the “Vatican Delegation” in Beijing, I simply could not say “No”. But what could I do to make sure that his letter reach the Holy Father, while not even I can be sure that my own many letters did reach him.

To make sure that our voice reached the Holy Father, I took the sudden decision of going to Rome. I left Hong Kong the night of 9th January, arriving in Rome the early morning of 10th January, just in time (actually, a bit late) to join the Wednesday Public Audience. At the end of the audience, we Cardinals and Bishops are admitted to the “bacia mano” and I had the chance to put into the hands of the Holy Father the envelop, saying that I was coming to Rome for the only purpose of bringing to him a letter of Bishop Zhuang, hoping he can find time to read it (in the envelop there was the original letter of the Bishop in Chinese with my translation into Italian and a letter of mine).

For obvious reasons, I hoped my appearance at the audience would not be too much noticed, but my late arrival in the hall made it particularly noticeable. Anyway, now everybody can see the whole proceeding from the Vatican TV (by the way, the audience was held in Paul VI Hall, not in St. Peter’s Square and I was a little late to the audience, but did not have to “wait in a queue, in a cold weather”, as some media erroneously reported).

When in Rome, I met Fr. Bernard Cervellera of AsiaNews. We exchanged our information, but I told him not to write anything. He complied. Now that someone else broke the news, I can agree to confirm it. Yes, as far as I know, things happened just as they are related in AsiaNews (the AsiaNews report “believes” that the Bishop leading the Vatican Delegation was Msgr. Celli. I do not know in what official capacity he was there, but it is most likely that he was the one there in Beijing).

In this crucial moment and given the confusion in the media, I, knowing directly the situation of Shantou and indirectly that of Mindong, feel duty-bound to share my knowledge of the facts, so that the people sincerely concerned with the good of the Church may know the truth to which they are entitled. I am well aware that in doing so I may talk about things which, technically, are qualified as “confidential”. But my conscience tells me that in this case the “right to truth” should override any such “duty of confidentiality”.

With such conviction, I am going to share with you also the following:
In the afternoon of that day, 10th January, I received a phone-call from Santa Marta telling me that the Holy Father would receive me in private audience in the evening of Friday 12th January (though the report appeared only on 14th January in the Holy See bulletin). That was the last day of my 85 years of life, what a gift from Heaven! (Note that it was the vigil of the Holy Father’s departure for Chile and Peru, so the Holy Father must have been very busy).

On that evening the conversation lasted about half an hour. I was rather disorderly in my talking, but I think I succeeded to convey to the Holy Father the worries of his faithful children in China.

The most important question I put to the Holy Father (which was also in the letter) was whether he had had time “to look into the matter” (as he promised Archbishop Savio Hon). In spite of the danger of being accused of breach of confidentiality, I decide to tell you what His Holiness said: “Yes, I told them (his collaborators in the Holy See) not to create another Mindszenty case”! I was there in the presence of the Holy Father representing my suffering brothers in China. His words should be rightly understood as of consolation and encouragement more for them than for me.

I think it was most meaningful and appropriate for the Holy Father to make this historical reference to Card. Josef Mindszenty, one of the heroes of our faith. (Card. Josef Mindszenty was the Archbishop of Budapest, Cardinal Primate of Hungary under Communist persecution. He suffered much in several years in prison. During the short-lived revolution of 1956, he was freed from prison by the insurgents and, before the Red Army crashed the revolution, took refuge in the American Embassy. Under the pressure of the Government he was ordered by the Holy See to leave his country and immediately a successor was named to the likings of the Communist Government).

With this revelation, I hope I have satisfied the legitimate “right to know” of the media and of my brothers in China.

The important thing for us now is to pray for the Holy Father, very fittingly by singing the traditional song “Oremus”: “Oremus pro Pontifice nostro Francisco, Dominus conservet eum et vivificet eum et beatum faciat eum in terra et non tradat eum in animam inimicorum eius.”

Some explanations may still be in order.

1. Please, notice that the problem is not the resignation of the legitimate Bishops, but the request to make place for the illegitimate and even excommunicated ones. Many old underground Bishops, though the retirement age law has never been enforced in China, have insistently asked for a successor, but have never received any answer from the Holy See. Some others, who have a successor already named, may be even already in possession of the Bulla signed by the Holy Father, were ordered not to proceed with the ordination for fear of offending the Government.

2. I have talked mainly of the two cases of Shantou and Mindong. I do not have any other information except the copy of a letter written by an outstanding Catholic lady, a retired University professor well-acquainted with affairs of the Church in China, in which she warns Msgr. Celli against pushing for the legitimization of “bishop” Lei Shi Ying in Sichuan.

3. I acknowledge myself as a pessimist regarding the present situation of the Church in China, but my pessimism has a foundation in my long direct experience of the Church in China. From 1989 to 1996 I used to spend six months a year teaching in the various Seminaries of the official Catholic community. I had direct experience of the slavery and humiliation to which those our brother Bishops are subjected. And from the recent information, there is no reason to change that pessimistic view. The Communist Government is making new harsher regulations limiting religious freedom. They are now strictly enforcing regulations which up to now were practically only on paper (from the 1st of February 2018 attendance to Mass in the underground will no longer be tolerated).

4. Some say that all the efforts to reach an agreement is to avoid the ecclesial schism. How ridiculous! The schism is there, in the Independent Church! The Popes avoided using the word “schism” because they knew that many in the official Catholic community were there not by their own free will, but under heavy pressure. The proposed “unification” would force everybody into that community. The Vatican would be giving the blessing on the new strengthened schismatic Church, taking away the bad conscience from all those who are already willing renegades and those others who would readily join them.

5. Is it not good to try to find mutual ground to bridge the decades-long divide between the Vatican and China? But can there be anything really “mutual” with a totalitarian regime? Either you surrender or you accept persecution, but remaining faithful to yourself (can you imagine an agreement between St. Joseph and King Herod?)

6. So, do I think that the Vatican is selling out the Catholic Church in China? Yes, definitely, if they go in the direction which is obvious from all what they are doing in recent years and months.

7. Some expert on the Catholic Church in China is saying that it is not logical to suppose a harsher religious policy from Xi Jinping. However, we are not talking about logical thinking, but the obvious and crude reality.

8. Am I the major obstacle in the process of reaching a deal between the Vatican and China? If that is a bad deal, I would be more than happy to be the obstacle.

Hong Kong, January 29, 2018

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

HERE IS YOUR LITTLE DOSE OF SATIRE TO HELP YOU COPE WITH THE LEFT’S PROMOTION OF FATHER JAMES MARTIN, S.J. TO SUCCEED FRANCIS LATER THIS YEAR.

Eccles and Bosco is saved


I stand by Fr James Martin SJ!

Posted: 28 Jan 2018 07:32 AM PST

Today’s big question is the following: if someone is demonically possessed, should we stop them from speaking in church? Fr James Martin SJ has received another ban, this time from Our Lady of Lourdes Church, in the Diocese of Metuchen, NJ, and it all seems dreadfully unfair. Luckily the talk will still go ahead, probably at the sewage farm in French Town, NJ, the most appropriate venue they could find.Justice for Jimmy

Standing by our most famous alt-Jesuit.

Contrast that cruelty with today’s Gospel, where Our Lord met a man possessed by an unclean spirit. Actually, the man’s teaching was less controversial than Fr Jim’s stuff: for example, he said, “I know who You are: the Holy One of God!” Not something you’d expect Fr Jim to say. Of course, St Mark may have missed out some details: perhaps the possessed man was also telling anyone who would listen that the Holy Spirit was female, or that Jesus should go and chat to a Canaanite woman to find out what His real mission was. You can’t mention every detail.

The point is that Jesus didn’t try to shut him up, or move him to another venue, he simply used dialogue, and built bridges with the man. “Be quiet! Come out of him!” was the formula. The demon left the man, and went into a herd of Jesuits grazing nearby, who rushed down the hill and – I’m sorry, I seem to have turned over two pages at once.

Martin awaiting exorcism

Be quiet! Come out of him!

So, being known for our mercy, we stand by Fr Jim. Probably with a megaphone, so that we can shout COME OUT OF HIM!whenever the great man starts to speak.

We should note that Fr Jim blames his downfall on a far-right website named “Tradition, Family and Property.” You have to watch out for these far-right fascists, in their black shirts (or shorts), shouting “What do we want? Tradition! Family! Property!” when what they should have asked for was “Modernism! LGBT relations! Ruin!” Yes, again Martin hits the nail on the head.

Spode and Wooster

Fr Spode of the Black Shorts tells off Fr James Martin.

We are also told that “another far-right online site that traffics in hate and is similarly obsessed with homosexuality” is Church Militant. Obsessed with homosexuality, unlike Fr James Martin SJ, you notice. The picture below, of its leading light, Michael Voris, shows the depths of shame and degradation to which Church Militant has sunk.

Voris and Eccles cake

In a shameless act of right-wing hatred, Voris eats an Eccles cake.

Remember that Fr James Martin SJ is an adviser to Pope Francis, and so, by association, is mostly infallible. Of course he is.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

THIS BIT OF SATIRE MAY HELP YOU COPE WITH THE VATICAN’S MORAL LEXICON BUT IT MAY ALSO GIVE YOU INDIGESTION

Eccles and Bosco is saved


The Pope Francis book of vegetables

Posted: 26 Jan 2018 06:34 AM PST

Everyone should explore the Pope Francis Lexicon, in which a bunch of oddballs, alt-Catholics, freaks, heretics, Protestants, loonies and “insightful contributors” each write on one-word themes favoured by the Pope. Readers may expect articles on Alzheimer’s, Coprophagy, and neo-Pelagianism (all terms favoured by the Holy Father), but instead they will find Curia, Dignity, and Gossip, to pick three at random.Pope Francis lexicon

I’m still cracking up over “Insightful contributors”.

However there is now a new book out, which promises to be both bodily and spiritually nourishing. It’s the Pope Francis book of vegetables, in which insightful contributors write about the vegetables that have influenced the Pope’s thought.

We only have space for three excerpts.

ASPARAGUS, by Tina Beattie.

Asparagus to most of us is a phallic symbol, which typifies the misogynistic hegemony of the Vatican. The Mass is an act of homosexual intercourse, and who can eat asparagus without being reminded of this? Although Pope Francis has done a lot to modernize the Catholic Church, his gynophobia will be seen as a blot on his rule. “Tina, can you do the flower arranging next Sunday?” they say to me, when what they should be saying is “Tina, can you celebrate Mass for us, drop the bit about God, and explain to us why the whole point of Catholicism is women’s rights?” Asparagus!! I hate it!!

asparagus

Human nourishing, human flourishing, … whatever.

BEANS, by Massimo Faggioli.

Although my main diet is “gelato”, or ice-cream, eminent professors of theology cannot live by ice-cream alone, and so my incredibly large brain is often fuelled by a plate of beans. Runner beans, broad beans, baked beans, kidney beans… all these help me understand the way that the Catholic Church has been moving, ever since it was founded in 1965. You will observe that the right-wing fundamentalist extremists who disagree with me hardly ever eat platefuls of beans, and it may be this that explains their spiritual blindness. Pope Francis is a man who looks to the future, and realises that the past never happened. The future is beans, not has-beans (an intellectual’s little joke there!)

baked beans

The 57 varieties, replacing the 10 commandments.

POTATOES, by James Martin.

The word “potato” is often used as a homophobic slur against the LGBT movement, because all words are. Still, many modern theologians tell me that Jesus was very fond of potatoes, and that the “bread” of the Last Supper is a mistranslation for “fries”. But back to more important things, namely, the need for all of us to embrace homosexuals, especially in church. Pope Francis has appointed me as his special adviser on potatoes, gay issues, and building bridges – and I have been asked to keep an eye open for new interpretations we can put on the Bible – and it will not be long before we have a gay pope!

potatoes

Three potatoes of the same sex in a loving relationship.

For more in-depth articles, including Cupich on Spinach, Radcliffe on Radishes, and Ivereigh on Turnips, see the book.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

THE SAN ANTONIO SAGA SHOCKS THE SENSIBILITIES OF SERIOUS CATHOLICS AND SERVES TO SEVERELY SABOTAGE THE SUPPORT OF THE FAITHFUL FOR THEIR SHEPHERD

Second shoe drops: San Antonio archbishop boots out EWTN nuns

Second shoe drops: San Antonio archbishop boots out EWTN nuns
Catholic Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller exacts payback for Our Lady of the Atonement entering the Ordinariate

By Mary Ann Mueller
VOL Special Correspondent
www.virtueonline.org
January 11, 2018

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS — As I returned from church on Sunday this notice was in my VOL e-mail from a friend in San Antonio.

“The local archbishop has forced the Poor Clares out of his diocese,” the e-mail said. “An announcement was made at the end of Mass. They were living in the parish house at OLA and left this morning to return to Alabama.”

I was floored! I didn’t believe what I was reading. I thought it was a hoax or fake news. I personally know the good Sisters from having attended various Anglican Use events and Becoming One gatherings with them at Our Lady of the Atonement (OLA) Catholic Church. The last time I saw the Sisters was in mid- August when I went to San Antonio to cover the installation of OLA’s new rector, Fr. Mark Lewis, following Fr. Christopher Phillips’ contentious removal as rector to pave the way for the founding Pastoral Provision parish of the Anglican Use to be shepherded into the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter, home-based in Houston, Texas.

Our Lady of the Atonement was founded by Fr. Phillips, a former Episcopal priest who could no longer stomach the liberal drift of The Episcopal Church. In the early 1980s he resigned his Episcopal priesthood and entered into the fullness of the Roman Catholic Church. Eventually he recovered his priesthood as a Catholic and went on to found Our Lady of the Atonement.

On August 15, 1983, Our Lady of the Atonement Catholic Church was erected by papal authority, specifically as an Anglican Use parish and with the full encouragement and cooperation of Archbishop Patrick Flores (IV San Antonio).

From those humble beginnings, Our Lady of the Atonement became a thriving Anglican Use Catholic parish with a dynamic K-12 parochial school. OLA is the mother church of the Pastoral Provision and Anglican Use in the United States which has eventually lead to the erection of the Anglican ordinariate by the Vatican offering a gracious way to provide disenfranchised Anglicans and Episcopalians a path to enter into the fullness of the Catholic Church yet retain beloved elements of their unique Anglican patrimony and liturgy.

ENTER THE POOR CLARES

As Our Lady of the Atonement grew and flourished, Fr. Phillips realized the need to have his growing parish and expanding school undergirded in prayer in a way that only contemplative nuns can do. So he reached out to Mother Angelica, the Alabama foundress of Our Lady of the Angels Monastery and the Eternal Word Television Network (EWTN) for cloistered nuns.

Because one of Mother Angelica’s nuns was an Anglican convert, the San Antonio Anglican Use parish was a natural fit for this group of Poor Clares of Perpetual Adoration. But it was Archbishop Jose Gómez (V San Antonio) who issued the official invitation for the Sisters to come to Texas and pray, allowing them to cluster around Our Lady of the Atonement and become a part of the “extended Atonement Family.”

Ten years ago (2008) when the Clarian call was sounded, five professed nuns, Sr. Marie St. Clare, Sr. Rose Marie, Sr. Grace Marie, Sr. Mary Peter and Sr. Elizabeth Marie, responded with the blessing of Mother Angelica. The Alabama nuns ventured to the Texas Hill County to establish a Poor Clare monastery becoming Mother Angelica’s second foundation of Poor Clares in the Southwest. Our Lady of Solitude Monastery was founded in 2005 in Arizona. Both the Arizona “Desert Nuns” and San Antonio’s “Texas Nuns” are daughter foundations of Our Lady of the Angels Monastery in Alabama. At the time, Mother Angelica’s community was bursting at the seams and the Hanceville, Alabama monastery was quickly becoming too small to accommodate new vocations.

Not only did the “Texas Nuns” have the blessing of Mother Angelica to make a second daughter foundation, they also had the permission of Franc Cardinal Rode, the Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life in Rome, to “establish a monastery for the Poor Clares of Perpetual Adoration in San Antonio.”

Fr. Phillips welcomed the Sisters with open arms and provided them a place to live, work and pray until they could build their own monastery — the Monastery of St. Michael the Archangel — which plans are still on the drawing board.

“We can now prepare in earnest for the arrival of five nuns from Our Lady of the Angels Monastery in Hanceville, Alabama. They will be taking up residence in our St. Joseph Parish House,” Fr. Phillips wrote in 2008. “There is, of course, a chapel there with the Blessed Sacrament, although they will be attending Mass ordinarily here at the parish. We’re looking forward to welcoming the Sisters as part of our extended “Atonement Family,” and we need to pray for them as they get ready to leave their present beloved monastery to begin this new work.”

For nearly a decade the brown-habited and black-veiled Sisters were a familiar sight at Our Lady of the Atonement. Many times they attended the various OLA Sunday and daily Masses and could be seen motionlessly kneeling in the empty church before the Tabernacle, silently offering up their prayers on behalf of the parish, the clergy, the parishioners and the students. The Poor Clares, which are a part of the Franciscan religious family, were a powerhouse of dedicated, consecrated, concentrated prayer which radiated forth from OLA touching all parts of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, the State of Texas, the United States and even the uttermost most parts of the earth. Much of what Fr. Phillip achieved was due to the prayers offered up on his behalf by the “Texas Nuns” and the graces they brought down through their hidden life of prayer and sacrifice.

The nuns not only busied themselves with adoration and prayer, they also supported themselves by making sterling silver scapulars and selling Nonnavita organic soap. They also evangelized through their blog Quidnunc and through their live radio show The Good Habit, broadcast on the Guadalupe Radio Network. Having come from Mother Angelica’s Alabama monastery, they understood the way radio worked and how to use it to evangelize effectively. Mother Angelica founded WEWN shortwave radio network and the EWTN satellite television network.

ENTER ARCHBISHOP GARCÍA-SILLER

Fr. Phillips and Our Lady of the Atonement had a warm pastoral relationship with Archbishop Flores (1979-2004) and his successor Archbishop Gómez (2004-2010). Then in 2010, came Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller and the warm relationship with OLA and Fr. Phillips cooled and eventually became combative and hostile.

Archbishop García-Siller is a member of the Missionaries of the Holy Spirit, a religious order based in Mexico City. First, he travelled to California to minister to the migrant workers, but was transferred to San Antonio after being an auxiliary bishop in the Archdiocese of Chicago.

Born in Mexico, Archbishop García-Siller’s passion is ministering to Hispanics. Initially he envisioned Our Lady of the Atonement adding Spanish Masses to its crowded liturgical schedule. But he quickly found out he could not do that because OLA was erected by papal decree, issued by Pope John Paul II, as solely an Anglican Use parish where Elizabethan English has pride of place, not Spanish, even Castilian Spanish.

Last year Archbishop García-Siller’s first shoe dropped. On January 19, 2017, just 10 days after the death of Archbishop Flores, he swooped in and unceremoniously forcibly removed Fr. Phillips as OLA’s rector and banished him from the property, sending him into exile to “reflect.” Fr. Phillips was immediately “replaced” by a Polish priest, Fr. Martin Leopold, the moderator of the curia for the Archdiocese of San Antonio, who “assured” the shell-shocked congregation that Fr. Phillips was still their pastor.

“… I have asked your pastor Father Christopher Phillips, effective today, January 19, 2017, to dedicate some time to reflect on certain specific concerns that I have shared with him,” Archbishop García-Siller wrote to the OLA membership. “These specific concerns relate to expressions in the life of the parish that indicate an identity separate from, rather than simply unique, among the parishes of the archdiocese. During this time of reflection and prayer, Father Phillips will not have the responsibility of pastoral care or authority in the parish.”

As with most Latin Rite Roman Catholic bishops, Archbishop García-Siller did not understand nor appreciate the Anglican Use patrimony. All he saw was a thriving Catholic congregation with an attached school that he could change to accommodate his own vision of ministry to the growing Hispanic population in his archdiocese. He then became alarmed when Fr. Phillips proposed to bring OLA into the Ordinariate after Bishop Steven Lopes (II Ordinariate) was enthroned.

The Anglican ordinariates were erected as a result of the Anglicanorum Coetibus issued by Pope Benedict XVI in 2009. Since then, three ordinariates have been established: Our Lady of Walsingham in England and Wales; the Chair of St. Peter in the United States and Canada; and Our Lady of the Southern Cross in Australia.

Former Episcopal Bishop Jeffrey Steenson (VIII Rio Grande) was tapped as the first ordinary. However, since he is a married man, he was made a mitered monsignor and not a bishop. The first bishop-ordinary of the American ordinariate is Bishop Lopes, who was enthroned in November 2016.

During Monsignor Steenson’s tenure as Ordinary, the other established Anglican Use parishes in Texas — Our Lady of Walsingham (Houston) and St. Mary the Virgin (Arlington) — came into the Ordinariate. But for the time being Our Lady of the Atonement (San Antonio) was content to humbly remain a Pastoral Provision parish as the North American ordinariate was erected and got its initial footing.

But once Our Lady of the Atonement made a move to join the Ordinariate at that moment, the San Antonio archbishop took a page from the Episcopal playbook. Fr. Phillips and his parishioners could enter the Ordinariate individually, but they would have to leave behind their property which they sacrificed and labored, scrimped and saved for more than 30 years to build. Archbishop García-Siller wanted the multimillion dollar OLA plant, which included the ornate English-style church and the newly-built expanded school.

The conflict between Our Lady of the Atonement and the San Antonio archdiocese found its way to Rome and the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith which oversees the world’s Anglican ordinariates. A solution was hammered out and Pope Francis decreed that Our Lady of the Atonement would enter the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter and that Fr. Phillips be incardinated as a priest of the Ordinariate. However, he would never return to OLA as the rector. Rather he would become the pastor emeritus during his forced retirement.

During Fr. Phillips’ two-month exile (Jan. 19-Mar. 21, 2017), the Poor Clare nuns reached out to the beleaguered priest. They offered him their altar to celebrate daily Mass since the Archbishop of San Antonio forbade the priest from entering Our Lady of the Atonement. The good Sisters also offered Fr. Phillips their friendship, concern and, most importantly, their heart-felt prayers born out of deep sisterly love.

For religious sisters or nuns to live, work and pray within a diocese or archdiocese, the local ordinary — bishop, archbishop or cardinal — must give his permission for the religious order to set up shop in his territory. Initially the Poor Clares received that permission from Archbishop Flores in 2008. And when Archbishop Gómez came on the scene, he was pleased to have Poor Clares in his archdiocese. But now Archbishop García-Siller has rescinded that permission and the nuns have been sent packing back to their motherhouse in Alabama.

Obediently the three remaining nuns — Sr. Grace Marie, Sr. Elizabeth Marie and Sr. Mary Peter — packed and quietly left San Antonio, leaving behind them a void of prayer, questions with few answers as well as surprise, sadness and frustration.

Church Militant reports that the Sisters left so quickly that the “parishioners weren’t even given the chance to say goodbye.”

On Sunday (Jan. 7), a letter was read from Mother Abbess Dolores Marie –Mother Angelica died on Easter Sunday 2016 — partially explaining the unfolding situation: “Honoring the request of Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller the Sisters are returning to our monastery in Hanceville, Alabama this week. Like the Magi, they will follow the Light of Christ in discerning their next steps, confident in God’s providential care.”

Parishioners feel that the Sisters’ forced removal from OLA is payback for the parish entering into the Ordinariate, intact with all its property — church and school — as well as creating a noticeable drop in archdiocesan income.

Church Militant reports that the heart-broken members of Our Lady of the Atonement feel Archbishop García-Siller ‘s expelling the nuns is “punitive, vindictive and godless.”

Archbishop García-Siller may have run his Poor Clares out of town, but there are still Poor Clares praying in Texas at monasteries located in Brenham (Diocese of Austin); Amarillo (Diocese of Amarillo); and Alamo (Diocese of Brownsville). None are left in the Archdiocese of San Antonio.

NO PROTECTION FOR POOR CLARES

For-the-most-part, since the San Antonio Poor Clare nuns are cradle Catholics and are not Episcopal or Anglican converts and they come from a Roman Catholic religious order, they do not come under the immediate protection of either the Ordinariate nor the Pastoral Provision. Therefore, they are subject to the whims of the local Roman Catholic bishop. In this case Archbishop García-Siller of San Antonio. He has spoken and they humbly obeyed.

This sort of thing would not happen to the All Saints Sisters of the Poor in Catonville, Maryland, which was founded in 1872. Fast forward to 2009 and the Episcopal order of religious sisters became Roman Catholic and were received into the Catholic Church by Archbishop Edwin O’Brien (XV Baltimore). Even though they have not entered into the Ordinariate, they are protected by guidelines of the Pastoral Provision from local episcopal overreach.

In 2013, eleven members of the Community of St. Mary the Virgin, a Church of England Anglo-Catholic religious order, swam the Tiber and became Roman Catholic. The Sisters, including their Mother Superior, were welcomed into the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham and therefore are secure under the English Ordinariate’s protection.

Canonically there are no Religious Sisters currently a part of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter, although there are a few who are individual members of the Ordinariate. However, several Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist, an active Dominican order, have started a Texas foundation in Houston and Sr. Thomas Aquinas has signed on as Director of Education at Our Lady of Walsingham, which is now the cathedral church for the Houston-based ordinariate.

The Dominican Sisters of Mary-Eucharist are safe at Our Lady of Walsingham. Daniel Cardinal DiNardo is welcoming and there are also two other Dominican orders living, working and praying in the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston including the Dominican Sisters of Houston and the Vietnamese Dominican Sisters.

VOL reached out to the Archdiocese of San Antonio and the Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter for comment and was met with silence by both.

Mary Ann Mueller is a journalist living in Texas. She is a regular contributor to VirtueOnline

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on THE SAN ANTONIO SAGA SHOCKS THE SENSIBILITIES OF SERIOUS CATHOLICS AND SERVES TO SEVERELY SABOTAGE THE SUPPORT OF THE FAITHFUL FOR THEIR SHEPHERD

GOD LOVE AND BLESS THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

image001-6

Hoorah!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Got to love the Marines, language and all. 

God Bless Colonel Jack Fessender.                                                                

    Marines have a wonderful way with words – clear, concise and to the point.

 

      THIS NEEDS TO GO AROUND THE USA MANY TIMES SO KEEP IT GOING! 

If you look closely at the picture above, you will note that all the Marines pictured are bowing their heads. That’s because they’re praying. This incident took place at a recent ceremony honoring the birthday of the corps, and it has the ACLU up in arms. “These are federal employees,” says Lucius Traveler, a spokesman for the ACLU, “on federal property and on federal time… For them to pray is clearly an establishment of religion, and we must nip this in the bud immediately.”

When asked about the ACLU’s charges, Colonel Jack Fessender, speaking for the Commandant of the Corps said, 

 

“To hell with ACLU!  GOD Bless Our Warriors.  Send the ACLU to Afghanistan! Then watch those SONS OF BITCHES pray.”

 

Please send this to people you know so everyone will know how stupid the ACLU is getting in trying to remove GOD from everything and every place in America.

 

May God Bless America ,

One Nation Under GOD!

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

DO NOT TRUST TWITTER, IT IS ALLIED WITH THE LEFT AGAINST CONSERVATIVES

notre_dame_paris

In their latest undercover exposé, Project Veritas and James O’Keefe published a bombshell report this week showing Twitter employees actively engaging in “shadow banning” and other covert techniques in an attempt to silence conservative voices on social media.

The explosive video demonstrates how former and current engineers at Twitter utilize shady policies and backdoor tricks to quash “political opponents” and reduce the number of users able to view their posts.

“One strategy is to shadow ban so you have ultimate control. The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone but they don’t know they’ve been banned, because they keep posting and no one sees their content. So, they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it,” said a former engineer at the social media giant.

“There was, I would say… Twitter was probably about 90% Anti-Trump, maybe 99% Anti-Trump,” added a former Content Review Agent.

More disturbing, employees detailed how they routinely share personal information and even deleted tweets with the Department of Justice, particularly regarding President Donald Trump; saying that Twitter is “more than happy to help the Department of Justice with their little [Trump] investigation.”

Watch the bombshell exposé above.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DO NOT TRUST TWITTER, IT IS ALLIED WITH THE LEFT AGAINST CONSERVATIVES

TODAY’S LITTLE DOSE OF SATIRE TO HELP YOU SOLVE THE CHINESE PUZZLE FRANCIS HAS GIVEN THE CHURCH

Eccles and Bosco is saved


Pope appoints a new leader for China

Posted: 24 Jan 2018 09:01 AM PST

In return for Pope Francis’s generous gesture in allowing the Chinese government to sack validly ordained Catholic bishops and appoint its own rather dodgy nominees (the “Henry VIII” option), Xi Jinping has agreed to step down as General Secretary of the Communist Party of China, President of the People’s Republic of China, and Chairman of the Central Military Commission (also, Lord High Everything Else), to allow the Holy Father to appoint his own nominee.Faggioli

Fa-go Li*, tipped as the new President.

*Chinese for “bean shoots”, number 47 on the menu.

It has been agreed that nobody in holy orders will be allowed to take up the post, and so those eminent Chinese Par-o Lin, Ro-si Ca, Spa-da Ro, and Ji-ma Tin (among others) are excluded from this prestigious post. Among the Chinese laymen available, it seems that Fa-go Li and I-va Ree will fit in best with the Communist ethos required.

Meanwhile Cardinal Zen has admitted that he is in fact a Buddhist and not a Catholic at all. The faithful were becoming suspicious when in Masses he always began with “If the Lord is with thee, it is Zen. But if the Lord is not with thee, that is Zen too,” and moved on to the “One hand clap” of peace. Since many leading members of the Catholic Church are in fact Lutherans, and Vincent Nichols is a Hindu, this has not come as any great shock.

Last Supper

It began as a “set meal for 13” but then…

The power struggle between those sinister Chinese, Fa-go Li and I-va Ree, for the supreme leadership is likely to be furious, and we may expect to see bloodshed before a decision is taken. Little Bo-Bi Mik was also expected to throw his hat in the ring, but since he is currently very very cross with Pope Francis about what happened in Chile, it is unlikely that Pope Francis will back him.

Ivereigh

Support I-va Ree, he’s got a proper Chinese suit!

Meanwhile, Tee-na Bee, Catholicism’s leading laywoman (well, after that Plou-men woman), is furious that she is not being considered for high office. But let’s face it, Tee-na, women just don’t get the jobs they deserve!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

A LITTLE DOSE OF SATIRE TO HELP YOU COPE WITH THE IDEA OF CANNONIZING QUEEN ELIZABLETH I.

Eccles and Bosco is saved


A guest post from Peter Hitchens (age 11)

Posted: 25 Jan 2018 04:50 AM PST

In skool we have been studdying the CATHLIC MATERS under Queen Elizzabeth, who was CHURCH OF ENGGLAND cheers cheers, and not a nasty Cathlic like her sister BLODDY MARRY. Mr CRANNMER our histry teecher told us to go and read the “orthoritative text” on the refformation, which is 1066 and all that. This tells us that queen elizzabeth was a GOOD THING and was known as GOOD QUEEN BESS, especially by all the people she had executted.hitchens tweet

The book is jolly exciting, as it hav lots of bludshed in it, and people being hung, drawn and quatered cheers. I asked mr crannmer if we could do a skool play with fotherington-tomas in the roll of edmund campoin, but he said no, hitchens, fotherington-tomas may be a cathlic but you must show MERCY. This is wot he calls being ECUMENICKLE chiz chiz. I discard him.

We hav also been reeding fox’s book of maters, which explanes that all the angliccans that died were HEROES and all the cathlics were traitors. Who would have thort that religoin could do that my dere?

molesworth man trap

The hitchens-peason anti-cathlic trapp.

Anyway, in brief the story is that all cathlics were giulty of TREESON, because POP PUIS V in ROM said that GOOD QUEEN BESS was a HERETTIC and not SAVED and shuold not be the QUEEN. So it was ILLEGAL to be a cathlic preist, and also to go to MASS. In fact it was probabbly ILLEGAL to beleive in God, becuase I asked MR WELLBY the skool chaplin, and he says that the traditoin of ATHIESM in the church of enggland is very strong even to this day.

Margaret Clitherow

This is MAGARET CLITHEROE who was a secret agent for POP PUIS chiz.

We also studdied the MATERDOM of magaret clitheroe, who was a sort of MARTYR HARI spy for the POP and spent her time sheltering cathlic preists rather than doing the PATROITIC THING and handing them over to be hung, drawn and quatered. She was killed by having HEAVY WIEGHTS squashing her, which was a GOOD THING and made everyone VERY HAPPY.

Well thats all ive got time for now, but you can lern more about the GOLDEN AGE of RELIGOIN on my twitter account or the MALE ON SUNDAY.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

GOOD NEWS ON THE ABORTION FRONT IN THE WAR TO PROTECT THE SACREDNESS OF HUMAN LIFE

BREAKING: ALL Comments on Reports of Cecile Richards Stepping Down as President of Planned Parenthood
Washington, DC — Cecile Richards is planning to step down as president of Planned Parenthood according to BuzzFeed and reported by the Daily Caller, Huffington Post, and Cosmopolitan. Jim Sedlak, executive director of American Life League and founder of Stop Planned Parenthood International (STOPP), released the following comment:

While we have no independent knowledge at this time on Cecile’s plans, it would not be a surprise to us if she decided to step down. In November 2016, it was obvious that Richards was devastated by the results of the presidential election. In communications with the Planned Parenthood organization the next day, she seemed distraught.

Since then, things have not gotten any better. Two congressional committees have recommended to the Justice Department that the federal government initiate a criminal investigation of Planned Parenthood. The Justice Department appears to be doing just that.

In addition, Planned Parenthood continues to close dozens of facilities each year, even while the organization receives record income and high profits. Since Richards assumed the presidency in February 2006, Planned Parenthood has gone from 872 facilities to 597 – a 32-percent loss of its presence in communities across the United States. Its client base has gone from 3.1 million to 2.4 million.

As the nation’s primary monitor of Planned Parenthood activities, we are watching this situation closely and will have further comments as things develop.

{ Much of this progress is due to President Trump’s strong pro-life statements and actions.  The Justice Department is investigating the extent of Planned Parenthood’s involvement in the sale and use of aborted children in the shady medical profession.  Cecille’s compensation as President of Planned Parenthood of America is reputed to be in excess of $1,000,000.  Like the transplantation of human organs ( $34,729,776,300.00 ) abortion is big business which pays its practitioners very well. }

 

Media inquiries, please contact Rob Gasper at 540.659.4171 or at rgasper@ALL.org

 

###

American Life League was co-founded in 1979 by Judie Brown, a three-time appointee to the Pontifical Academy for Life. ALL is the oldest national Catholic pro-life education and advocacy organization in the United States. For more information, please visit www.ALL.org or call 540-659-4171.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on GOOD NEWS ON THE ABORTION FRONT IN THE WAR TO PROTECT THE SACREDNESS OF HUMAN LIFE

LET ME EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE WRONG IN SOME OF THEIR PRONOUNCEMENTS

28be5-let-me-explain-to-you-why-youre-wrong-shirt-black1

Of Popes, Bishops, Priests – and the Bridge Too Far

The calling of the Twelve in the Gospel should lead us to ponder the priorities of every priest and bishop. After the Ascension of Jesus and Descent of the Holy Spirit, the newly ordained bishops were called to proclaim Jesus the Redeemer, to celebrate the Sacraments in memory of Him, and to govern their respective churches.

Every priest, bishop, and pope would henceforth be “priest, prophet, and king,” in imitation of Christ, holding these offices in order of priority. A priest offers and administers the Sacraments on behalf of the people. As a prophet, a priest proclaims the Word of God and exercises his legitimate teaching authority. As a king, a priest governs the Church with Christ as the foundation, according to his lawful jurisdiction.

Today, however, there seems to be an inversion of these priorities, resulting in significant distortions: The sequence is not priest, prophet, and kingwith the accent on service, but king, prophet, and priest with the accent on ecclesial authority, Christ being largely absent.

The long history of papal triumphalism in the name of Christ came to a symbolic end with Paul VI’s retirement of the papal tiara (now on display at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington D.C.). Papal leadership in defense of Christendom also symbolically ended with Pope Paul’s return of the Turkish battle flag captured by Christians at Lepanto.

The papal foray into world affairs in the name of Christ made a comeback in St. Pope John Paul’s confrontation with Communism. Christ was always at the forefront, however, from JPII’s reference to the Church’s “living stones” as Poland’s foundation, to his fearless confrontation with the Communist Sandinistas, cross in hand, as he celebrated Mass in Nicaragua.

Under the current pontificate, that bold Christian triumphalism has given way to a kind of stealth secular triumphalism – with calls for dialogue, open immigration, and environmentalism – rarely an invocation of Jesus.

During his recent “Address to Authorities, La Moneda Palace” in Chile, Pope Francis complimented the Chileans on their beautiful country and advances in democracy. He urged them to avoid consumerism and to address environmental problems. But the Holy Father continued a pattern he established in America during his speeches to civil authorities. He carefully avoided mentioning “Jesus,” “Lord,” and “God.” As a result and perhaps by intention, he appeared primarily as a visiting head of state, with a mostly secular policy agenda.

As a body, the American bishops have followed the Holy Father in pushing the boundaries of their prophetic and kingly charisms into the secular arena. The distinctions between magisterial Catholic principles and prudential judgments are, at times, clear.  Dealing with abortion laws, for example, or Nazi practices having to do with the extermination of Jews are clear-cut cases.

*

At other times, careful distinctions need to be made – for example, whether it is morally acceptable for Catholic politicians to support incrementally better (but not perfect) legislation with hopes to reduce the number of abortions. But the USCCB’s support for specific immigration policies – where there can very well be reasonable disagreements – is clearly a bridge too far.

The bishops simply lack jurisdiction in such matters. Formulating a just immigration policy, like the application of just war principles, rightly belongs to the laity according to Vatican II (“Decree on the Apostolate of Laity”).  Hence, the Catholic faithful need not look upon the opinions of the USCCB as magisterial and binding, but as the opinions of fellow citizens.

By claiming more than their proper authority, the bishops are unwittingly ushering in a new form of ecclesial egalitarianism, in which episcopal statements will have no more weight than a position paper of a Washington think tank.

The trickle-down effect on priests has been corrosive. Over the decades, it has become almost irresistible for ordinary priests to engage in various forms of political posturing, effectively encroaching on the rights of the faithful. But even apart from politics, this attitude encourages the mistaken assumption that the homily (part of the priest’s prophetic office) is central to the Mass. It is not. (Although it would be a great service to the faithful for all priests to take homily preparation more seriously.)

The greatest service of a priest is the reverent celebration and administration of the Sacraments, with the distribution and reception of Holy Communion as the perfect culmination of the priestly ministry. The homily flows from Jesus and the Scriptures and should be taken seriously on those grounds alone.

When I was a young man and not yet ordained, I assisted at several private Masses celebrated by an elderly priest suffering with dementia. He was truly reverent, revealing a lifetime’s habitual devotion. His homilies were always religious and occasionally very amusing. One day he solemnly “excommunicated” the archbishop and “installed” the pastor as the replacement. The pastor offered no objection.

Despite dementia, that priest demonstrated the correct priorities. In imitation of Christ, he was first a priest, then a prophet, and finally a king. He may have lost the ability to be prophet and king, but his priesthood remained intact. And he distributed Holy Communion for the sanctification of those present.

There are countless faithful Catholics, I suspect, who would prefer this priest and his dementia to politically activist – and liturgically destructive – pastors.

When the beloved Pope Benedict resigned, his friend Cardinal Francis Arinze sorrowfully remarked that the resignation would “help many to get more mature in our faith . . . help all of us to be deeper in our faith, to be also, let us say, less sentimental.” He added, “Our faith is not on the pope, it is on Christ who is the foundation of the church.”

 

*Image: Fire from heaven, The Sacrifice of Elijah Before the Priests of Baal by Domenico Fetti, c. 1631 [Hampton Court Palace, London]

Rev. Jerry J. Pokorsky

Rev. Jerry J. Pokorsky

Father Jerry J. Pokorsky is a priest of the Diocese of Arlington. He is pastor of St. Catherine of Siena parish in Great Falls, Virginia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LET ME EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE WRONG IN SOME OF THEIR PRONOUNCEMENTS