DEMOCRATS OBJECT TO BEING CALLED “THE PARTY OF DEATH” BUT AFTER READING THIS YOU WILL KNOW THAT THE TAG FITS

!!!!

michellewilkins4

After Mom’s Baby Cut Out of Her Womb, Colorado Democrats Vote Against Unborn Victims Bill

   Steven Ertelt   Apr 28, 2015   |   12:41PM    Denver, CO LifeSiteNews
[EMPHASIS BY ABYSSUM IN BOLD FACE TYPE]

The Colorado state Senate today passed a bill that would provide justice for unborn children who are killed or injured in violent crimes against their mother. The chamber approved the bill on an 18-17 vote with every Republican supporting the bill and every single Democrat in the Colorado Senate saying that unborn children are not victims of violent crimes and do not deserve justice.

Colorado Democrats opposed the bill after prosecutors told the public they were unable to charge with a murder a woman who cut a 7-month-old unborn baby out of her mother’s womb. The baby, named Aurora, died after that violent and horrific crime but the woman who cut her out of her moth’s womb will not be held accountable in her death.

The national law and laws in more than half of the states in the nation allow prosecutors to charge criminals for two crimes when they kill and injure both a pregnant mother and her unborn child in the course of a violent crime outside the context of abortion. Without this law in place, assailants would only be held accountable for killing or injuring the mother in such an attack or assault and would face no punishment for killing the unborn child — even days before birth.

According to the National Right to Life Committee, some 37 states recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide in at least some circumstances. The federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act, enacted April 1, 2004, covers unborn victims of federal and military crimes.

Of the 37 states, 29 of them offer justice and protecting for women and unborn children throughout pregnancy while another 10 offer the protection only during the early stages.

The Colorado Senate passed SB 268, the Offenses Against Unborn Children Act.  During the debate on the measure, pro-abortion Democrats falsely claimed the bill would be used to prosecute women for miscarriages or would ban abortions, even though federal unborn victims law and the laws of dozens of states have not done so.

As LifeNews has reported, the Colorado woman who cut out a 7-month-old unborn baby from Michelle Wilkins’ (pictured above) abdomen, resulting in the death of the infant, will not be charged with murder. That’s because the state lacks an unborn victims law to hold criminals accountable when they kill or injure unborn children in such criminal attacks.

Republican Senator Ellen Roberts, a woman who is not pro-life on abortion, summed up the debate and the need for the bill: “It’s about the acknowledgment that there were two victims of a crime. “The bottom line is, admitting that a fetus could be person in certain circumstances .. does not undermine abortion rights.”

“Could we possibly take the politics out of this?” Roberts asked after abortion advocates called a unborn baby killed in such a crime “the pregnancy.” “What if we kept our minds open to a bill that could address the kind of situation we had in March? We all know it’s dead on arrival in the House … (but) what if we sent the House a bill that showed courage?”

SB268 would allow prosecutor “bring a charge that any person on the street would think would be appropriate” she added.

Colorado Citizens for Life said the law is needed to provide justice for pregnant women and their unborn children.

Sarah Zagorski, the Executive Director of Colorado Citizens for Life said, “This horrific case highlights the need for an Unborn Victims of Violence law in Colorado, which would recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide. This woman’s baby was viable and suffered a cruel and violent death. Colorado should have laws punishing perpetrators of these innocent, defenseless victims.”

She added: “SB 268 will bring justice to unborn babies who are injured or killed in violent crimes against their mother. The importance of this legislation came to light in March when Dynel Catece Lane was arrested in Longmont, Colorado after she attacked Michelle Wilkins and cut her seven-month-old unborn baby out of her womb. In this unbelievable act of violence, Wilkins’ baby, Aurora, died but she survived. However, after the incident, a spokeswoman from the Boulder Country District Attorney’s Office said Lane won’t face murder charges for the baby’s death.”

“Recent shows that 76% of American’s support Unborn Victims of Violence legislation. This should show Colorado lawmakers that it’s time for our state to catch up with the rest of Americans and implement laws that reflect what the majority of our citizens believe. It is outrageous that Colorado prosecutors were not able to bring murder charges against

“Although Planned Parenthood and the ACLU argued that Colorado’s 2013 “Crimes Against Pregnant Women” law, is sufficient for our state, it didn’t bring Michelle Wilkins or her baby Aurora the justice they deserve. Now SB 268 is headed to the Senate floor,” Zagorski said.

The bill creates a number of crimes against unborn children who are killed or injured in the process of an assault or homicide against the baby’s mother. The measure is similar to bills that have been used in the past to prosecute criminals for two crimes against both mother and child. Unborn victims laws have repeatedly been upheld as constitutional in court.

Dynel Catrece Lane was arrested after she attacked a pregnant woman and cut her 7-month-old unborn baby from her womb. In this unbelievable act of violence, the baby died but the mother, Michelle Wilkins (pictured), survived. A report shows the baby breathed a heavy last gasp before she died.

Colorado state law does not regard unborn children as human beings who deserve justice when they are killed. In 2013, Colorado Democrats killed a bill that would add the state to the list of more than 25 states that provide justice and protection for pregnant women and unborn children. Pro-abortion groups Planned Parenthood and NARAL opposed the bill – the very groups that endorsed Boulder County District Attorney Stan Garnett in his race for attorney general. Garnett is the county prosecutor who is not bringing forth murder charges against lane for killing Wilkins’ unborn baby.

Senate president Bill Cadman is the sponsor of the unborn victims bill, Senate Bill 268, that mirrors federal law and the laws of dozens of states.

“This is a sad day for the mothers of Colorado, and for the fathers of Colorado,” Cadman said in a statement after no murder charge for Baby Aurora was brought. “And for every Coloradan who was stunned to learn that no murder charges will be brought on behalf of a Longmont infant savagely cut from its mother’s body in one of the most horrific crimes in recent memory.”

michellewilkins4

“Where’s the justice for that baby?” said Cadman.

“That’s very simple,” he said. “It doesn’t call into question anybody’s rights over their own body. It absolutely protects the right of the mom and of her baby.”

“This really is a horrific situation. . .  we need equal protection for the 60,000 plus babies who are born in Colorado every year; protection that they don’t have now; protection that is afforded to them in 38 states, including some of the most liberal like California. That’s what this bill does. This is not new. This is an issue that’s come before us. Frankly, it was a discussion that I had with a house member, Representative Joshi, about two months ago, and it certainly is timely now,” Cadman said.

Current state law in these kinds of cases is governed by a 2013 law called the Unlawful Termination of a Pregnancy Act, that merely attaches a sentence enhancement for crimes against pregnant women — while ignoring the death of or injury to the unborn baby. That law provides no justice for unborn children.

About abyssum

I am a retired Roman Catholic Bishop, Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to DEMOCRATS OBJECT TO BEING CALLED “THE PARTY OF DEATH” BUT AFTER READING THIS YOU WILL KNOW THAT THE TAG FITS

  1. Democrats as Death Dealers? Well, let’s see. They are the Party of : death to children in their mothers’ wombs; death to girls because they are girls in their mothers’ wombs; death to black children because they are black in their mothers’ wombs; death to Hispanic children because they are Hispanic in their mothers’ wombs; death to the elderly because they are too old; death to the “defective” in or out of their mothers’ wombs; death to embryonic humans; death to children in their mothers’ wombs who prevent their mothers from achieving “autonomy” like men; death to children in their mothers’ wombs because they render their mothers not as free as men to engage in “no consequences” sex; death to children in their mothers’ wombs because these children render their mothers not as free as men to engage in hook up sex whenever and however they choose. Other than this, clear exercise of the Supreme Court created right to death, of course, the Democrat Death Dealers are prolife. And they have all US taxpayers pay for their exercise of their Death Right. Guy McClung , San Antonio

Comments are closed.