If one came from Mars and examined the policies of the California legislature, courts, state-wide officials, and governor, one would conclude that it is designed to destroy the emerging Mexican-American middle class (if we can even use such a sloppy term for vastly increasing numbers of so-called mixed marriages and families). The cause ultimately is that California is overrepresented by those in Bay Area zip codes and underrepresented by those from Sacramento to Bakersfield. The former are idealists, the latter pragmatists. The consequences of the ideas of the one fall in reality on the other. In extremis, we require more a man who can put on a roof or pour cement than we do a Facebook auditor who censors what he is told by his monopoly employer. Examine the following: EnergyCalifornia, after Hawaii, has the most expensive gas and electricity prices in the country. Why? The state sits on top of billions of cubic feet of untapped natural gas. It could double its oil output. Its gas taxes are the highest in the nation; its highways among the very worst. What is the purpose behind punishing hard-working families with charging them exorbitant rates for turning on their air-conditioning (Bakersfield and Fresno do not have tolerable summer-time temperatures like San Francisco or the coast in general), or charging them an extra $1-a-gallon as they drive trucks and trailers to do landscaping, carpentry, and general construction? Who created this green mania? Mostly coastal elites whose chief experience with Hispanics is as employers of domestic help, gardening, cooking, nannying, and cleaning, mostly in the sense of hiring resident aliens, both legal and illegal. SchoolsMastery of language, spoken and oral, history, math, science, and engineering are the keys to upward mobility, and most second-and third-generation Hispanics want an opportunity for competitive schools. Most don’t have the money, generally, to spend $50,000 to put their children in Sacred Heart, the Menlo School, etc. The new work agendas and therapeutic indoctrination in public schools, in a zero-sum sense, takes precious hours per week out of the curriculum that we know can hone the skills of minority communities. Who issues these directives? White elites who have no experience with, or desire to live among, work among, and school among, the Other? ImmigrationWhen thousands from Central America and southern Mexico cross illegally into the United States, the majorities are not diverse, do not speak English, do not have capital, and are not legal. In other words, they inevitably seek public assistance in almost every aspect of their lives, thereby recalibrating those services away from poorer citizens in dire need of health, education, legal, housing, and food assistance. And, illegal immigrants naturally gravitate to Spanish-speaking communities, where the white liberal myth of ethnic solidarity does not exist. More often, gang members prey on American citizens of Mexican descent, often in the racist fashion that they no longer speak Spanish, act white, or believe they are “better” than others. The grandchildren of Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Diane Feinstein will not school with those who do not speak English, in schools that are unsafe and forced to offer remediation classes that are not pathways to college. CrimeSanctuary Cities and Biden’s de facto amnesties send the message that the newly arriving will not be audited, not for prior criminality, not for active COVID-19, not for legal efforts to apply for citizenship. And such new arrivals in Hispanic communities, should some revert to crime, or be infectious, or use false identification at the market, bank, or when pulled over, pose a greater threat to those in Selma, Sanger, and Parlier than in Atherton, Malibu, and Brentwood. TaxesCalifornians pay the steepest aggregate gas, income, and sales taxes in the nation. Does such revenue make the lives of the middle class easier—safe roads and freeways, reservoirs to store water to keep the state going during droughts, a safe power grid that does not ignite grassfires, schools that allow children to get good jobs, and a competitive college education, general safety built on the deterrence that criminals know they will be arrested, convicted if guilty, and sentenced and incarcerated for their crimes? The answers are unfortunately no. The upper coastal classes and very rich alone have the clout, money, and influence to navigate around these realities—ironic when they were chiefly responsible for creating them. HousingSixty million dead trees rotted over the last 4 years after the drought and proved to be green napalm last year when fires destroyed Sierra Nevada communities and forests. Yet plywood now goes for $80-100 a sheet. Contractors increasingly save even small but precious 2×6 remnants and leftovers. In a state with rich natural resources, we don’t mine, harvest timber, tap our natural gas and oil fully, or allow farms their contracted irrigation water. And to add insult to injury, we hyper-regulate the productive classes, demonize them, and then whine when we can’t get timely granite counters or that new deck, or that hot tub installed. We are baffled that California housing has soared 30-40 percent in the last 12 months when labor is short, and building materials scarce, while regulators are plentiful and zero-interest keeps the entire house of cards standing for maybe a year or so more. In sumThe state is waiting for a middle-class populist who runs on the issues of fairness to the middle classes, appeals to all races and ethnicities on the basis of practical rather than tribal affinities, and renounces cheap virtue signaling. The state is tired of nasal-sounding, Bay-area spoiled adult-children and privileged ethnic elites who pose as victims of “systemic racism”, and hyper-rich Silicon Valley grandees who lecture the poorer on their privileges while they build 50,000 square-foot homes on their Hawaiian Island estates. A “California Can Be Great Again” message, spread by a working-class pragmatist, one who feels comfortable with all races and ethnic backgrounds, and whom neither panders nor virtue signals, could yet save the state‚ or at least delay our fall by a generation.
Formerly conjoined twins—who underwent an unprecedented separation procedure—just celebrated five years of life since their operation.
The South Texas twins are healthy and thriving, thanks to the expertise of pediatric surgeon Dr. Haroon Patel and the team at Driscoll Children’s Hospital.
Scarlett and Ximena Torres were born conjoined, a rare and surprising story on its own.
The sisters are, in fact, triplets; their identical sister, Catalina, was born free of health complications.
“I was 3 months pregnant when I found out and I couldn’t believe it,” mother Silvia Hernandez-Ambriz told Driscoll Children’s Hospital, “because they told me there were three girls and that [two] became conjoined.”
In a pregnancy with triplets, conjoined twins are extremely rare, with a 1-in-50-million chance of occurrence, reported KSAT.
“I did get very sad because I thought they were not going to make it,” Silvia told the hospital.
Because of the nature of their conjunction, the girls had a team of 45 to 50 doctors and personnel of various specialties, including anesthesiology, plastic surgery, pediatric surgery, orthopedics, radiology, and urology.
“This had never been done at Driscoll Children’s Hospital,” said Patel in a video interview with the hospital. “So this was new to us.”
But the surgeons prepared for the procedure and employed every contingency until they were certain the operation would become second nature.
On April 12, 2016, Scarlett and Ximena underwent the 12-hour surgery, which was successful. They spent just a few weeks in the Driscoll post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and were released from the hospital months ahead of schedule.
“I knew they were going to be strong, because since the moment I saw them the first time, they always fought for their lives,” said Silvia.
She was right, and her girls have been happy and healthy ever since. Soon after the surgery, they learned to function independently of their twin.
On April 12, 2021, they celebrated the five-year anniversary of their surgery. The girls visited the hospital and the staff were overjoyed to see the young ladies, who the hospital says “light up every room they’re in.”
“Don’t they look good,” Patel said, watching them run around the clinic. “They know their way around here.”
Patel explained that, from the very start of working with the girls, he had told Silvia they were going to become like family.
“We let the parents know from the start that this was going to be a lifelong relationship. It wasn’t going to be a one-and-done surgery. The girls are going to have ongoing medical needs,” said Patel.
They are, indeed, like family, with the twins attending checkups on a regular basis.
“They’ve got free rein here,” joked Patel. “They are part of the family.”
Seasonal influenza, also known as “the flu,” visits America every year, similar to tornados, thunderstorms, heat waves, and snowstorms. As tracked by the CDC, over the past decade symptomatic flu cases ranged from 9 to 45 million cases per year in the US. Hospitalizations varied from 140 to 810 thousand, and deaths from 12 to 61 thousand, depending on the particular year, strain of influenza, and effectiveness of the vaccine. This year, “flu activity is unusually low at this time” according to CDC surveillance. Since late September 2020, they recorded only about 2000 cases, a minute fraction of the tens of millions of cases in past years. Hospitalizations this flu season are minimal with only 224 confirmed influenza hospitalizations from September 2020 to mid-April 202, nowhere near the hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations in past seasons. Deaths are harder to measure since the CDC conveniently changedhow deaths are characterized this past year. Instead of pneumonia, influenza, and COVID being in separate categories, now it’s called PIC, lumping the three entities together. For children, the CDC doesn’t use PIC as COVID hospitalization or death in children is exceedingly rare, unless the child is immunocompromised. In each of the past three years, pediatric deaths ranged from 144 to 198 per year. This current flu season has seen only one single child die from the flu. So what happened to the flu? From millions of cases to a few thousand. It would like having a winter with no snow, which despite predictions of NY Times climate experts, hasn’t come close to happening. Perhaps the flu cases are mysteriously lost, like Hillary Clinton’s emails, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or John Durham’s sealed indictments. A virologist was perplexed and honest. According to the New York Times, “We don’t really have a clue,” said Richard Webby, a virologist at the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis. “We’re in uncharted territory. We haven’t had an influenza season this low, I think as long as we’ve been measuring it. So what the potential implications are is a bit unclear.” Other than an occasional news story like the one above, the media has been rather uninterested in this fluke of science, instead, wringing their paws over an election audit in Arizona or Frank Luntz and Kevin McCarthy shacking up. As big media is too busy looking for racism hiding behind every Republican, let’s explore why the flu might have mysteriously vanished. One theory is that public health measures for COVID eradicated the flu. Did we just now discover hygiene? Was last year the first time that Americans washed their hands and used hand sanitizer? We have always done these things. And if they worked to stop the flu, why didn’t they stop COVID? We didn’t need Dr. Fauci scolding us into isolation when sick. Those ill with the flu stayed home until better. We naturally distanced when sick. Again, if these measures, far more draconian this year, stopped the flu, why didn’t they also stop COVID? Perhaps the flu vaccine last season was a home run, unlike the 40-60 percent effectiveness of past seasons, one year as low as 19 percent effective. In a normal flu season, the vaccination rate is between 50-60 percent. It was likely much lower last year during COVID as a flu shot was not a priority and many avoided going to the doctor unless necessary. Maybe it was the incessant mask use, going from none to one to two to one, according to Dr. Fauci’s whims. If masks worked so well, why weren’t we told to wear them every flu season, preventing tens of thousands of deaths and hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations? It is not like masks were just invented last year. Does size matter? The influenza virus is 80-120 nanometers. COVID is similar in size, 50-140 nm. If, as we are incessantly told, masks work to save lives from COVID, then they should work similarly for influenza. Yet COVID cases are high and influenza cases are near zero. Why is that? The pore size in standard surgical masks is 300 nm to 10,000 nm, far larger than either virus, meaning masks cannot explain the discrepancy. Masks don’t stop either virus, which is why we never masked up during past flu pandemics. Unless the masks contain a pore bouncer, letting in only COVID but telling influenza to get lost. In addition, if masks work, why the push for the vaccine? If the vaccine works, and it does far more effectively than the flu vaccine, why are we still masked up? It can’t be both ways. Except in Congress where the few Biden speech attendees, all vaccinated, were distanced and covering their faces. Do they consider the message they are sending? Apparently not. The NY Times article suggests previous public exposure to influenza with no previous exposure to COVID might explain things. But every year there is “previous public exposure” to influenza and every year plenty of flu cases. Until this year. As influenza occurs every year, there is always natural immunity to influenza yet there are always many cases the following year. What changed? Could “the mere presence of the corona virus” suppress flu cases? As in the big tough Chinese alpha male coronavirus scaring away the metrosexual beta male influenza virus? Has social justice and wokeness penetrated viral capsids? Perhaps that makes sense to CNN anchors. I’ll throw out an idea, namely testing. Perhaps COVID numbers are artificially high due to PCR cycle thresholds, as I have written about. At cycle threshold of 35-40, “up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus”according to the NY Times, meaning most positives are false positives. Deliberately attributingaccidental deaths to COVID falsely inflates the death counts. What if influenza cases were incorrectly labeled as COVID? After all, everything now is called PIC. Perhaps the influenza numbers are much higher and COVID numbers much lower based on misclassification. The CDC wouldn’t play numbers games like that would they? Sure they would. The CDC changed its cycle threshold for “vaccine breakthrough cases,” those cases occurring post vaccination, to 28, far below that for normal cases of 40 or higher, to reduce COVID cases numbers after the vaccine. Imagine if they had done that last year. COVID cases numbers would resemble that of a bad flu season. The CDC was happy to let high case numbers work against President Trump last year when he was campaigning for reelection but now want to lower case numbers to favor their heralded vaccines. This is the same CDC that allowed a national teachers union to help draft school opening guidance, just as Congress lets lobbyists write legislation. Can the CDC be trusted? The CDC director said their data, “suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus” yet vaccinated people are still distanced and masked. Is the CDC about public health or just another political arm of the ruling class, like the FBI and DOJ? Are the vanishing flu cases just a numbers game, the CDC playing three-card Monte, hiding flu cases while America bets her economy on this con game, the American people coming up short, and the Democrats always winning? Was it ever really about the virus? Brian C Joondeph, MD, is a physician and writer.
In new interview, Abp. Viganò discusses Vatican II, decline of Marian devotion, and the Novus Ordo Mass
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò credits Our Lady with the ‘gift’ of his ‘conversion.’ He says, ‘what unites heretics of all times is their intolerance of the cult reserved for the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Marian doctrine it presupposes and of which it is the liturgical expression.’Thu May 6, 2021 – 4:02 pm EST
May 6, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – In a new interview, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò has once more returned to the topic of the Second Vatican Council, the loss of Marian devotion followed by that Council, as well as the deficiencies of the Novus Ordo Mass.
Speaking with the Italian website Radio Spada – this is the second installment of two parts of an interview (here part one) – the Italian prelate sees a satanic involvement in the decline of devotions to Our Lady after the Council and explains that “the gift of my ‘conversion’ – of my becoming aware of the conciliar deception and the present apostasy – became possible thanks to my constant devotion towards the Blessed Mother, which I have never ceased to have.” Describing how Our Lady has been undermined – even denied in her role as Co-Redemptrix – Archbishop Viganò points out that “what unites heretics of all times is their intolerance of the cult reserved for the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Marian doctrine it presupposes and of which it is the liturgical expression.”
Your Excellency, we are happy to “complete” our interview with you, which we began in March on the occasion of the presentation of the new book Neo-Vatican Gallery by Marco Tosatti, along with your preface (in addition to the English translation, the book has also been published in Italian and Spanish). First of all, let’s observe that that first conversation went all over the world in just a few weeks; it was translated into many languages and opened a lively debate. There was widespread interest and attention; here and there a few minor criticisms – above all on the theme of “Benedict XVI” – but not very consistent on the theological level: the polemic mainly concerned the theme you raised in relation to a certain Hegelian influence on the thought of Ratzinger. Have you been aware of this aspect of the discussion? If you like, this interview could be an occasion for you to reply; otherwise, we can proceed with the rest.
We will divide today’s conversation into several parts, which we will outline here for the benefit of our readers, in order to assist their understanding: first, the present role of the English-speaking world in defense of the Tradition, then the Marian question, next the liturgical question, and finally a section on ecumenism.
Let’s begin then with the theme of the English-speaking world, to which Marco Tosatti’s new book is addressed. Historically, opposition to conciliar ideology “spoke a lot of French” (also because of the leadership role of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre), but today one notices a significant expansion of this front among those who speak English, in particular in the United States. Moreover, the famous “Agatha Christie Indult” should not be forgotten, even though that operation had obvious limitations, as a sign that was not insignificant for its time (the early 1970s). Because of your diplomatic postings, and in particular your role as Apostolic Nuncio to Washington, you have been familiar with the English-speaking world for decades. So, what do you think about this evolution? What could it be due to? What prospects do you see in this sense?
I imagine that the reason that the opposition to the conciliar ideology initially primarily “spoke French” – to use your expression – was due to the fact that in those years France could boast of intellectuals of a certain depth, both laymen as well as clergy, for whom the very close connection between social and ecclesial events was evident. Let’s not forget that France was faced with bitter social conflicts in 1968 and a form of ultra-progressivism that was perhaps less widespread in Italy, above all outside the larger cities. In France there was a greater perception of the revolution that was underway in a nation of deep Catholic tradition that had already experienced the persecutions and effects of anti-clerical governments.
In England, where the minority Catholic presence had always had to confront Anglicanism, the evidence that the conciliar Church was embracing the liturgical and doctrinal positions of Protestantism led to both a firm and united response by the faithful as well as many non-Catholics, who considered the surrender of the Holy See to the secularizing mentality of modern society to be incomprehensible. The so-called “Agatha Christie Indult” revealed the dismay of many intellectuals over the decision to cancel the traditional liturgy, which was the element that distinguished Catholics from Anglicans. It seemed like a repudiation of centuries of heroic resistance of Catholics in the face of religious persecution. The healthy ecumenism of the pre-conciliar era had favored a constant stream of Anglicans returning to the womb of the Catholic Church, but in the Seventies, especially after the liturgical reform, this stream dried up, and “conversions” began moving instead towards the Eastern Churches. According to the heterodox conciliar theses, it was thought that even those who wished or desired with a sincere heart to re-enter the One Fold under the One Shepherd should instead be left in schism and heresy.
In Italy, the seat of the Papacy, which was politically led by the Christian Democratic Party, there was a much more marginal response to the conciliar revolution, perhaps due to the fact that Catholicism did not seem to be at risk of extinction.
The revival in the United States is more recent and is the result of the delay with which American Catholics saw the faith and the liturgy being threatened in everyday life. In the 1950s the American Church was growing rapidly, thanks to the far-sighted action of Pius XII and the apostolate of many excellent Prelates, among whom we cannot fail to recall Archbishop Fulton Sheen. The enthusiasm of a relatively young nation, the innumerable conversions, and the “freshness” of Catholicism in the United States probably delayed the exterior manifestation of the crisis, which however had already begun in the Jesuit universities and in the progressivist circles from which Biden, Kerry, Pelosi and other “Catholic” politicians emerged (here).
Themes connected to Catholic morality like respect for life were also supported by Presidents who were not Catholic, with the applause of the Episcopate and the faithful. It is only recently that the rift between the grassroots and the highest levels has become more perceptible, both in society as well as in the Church: on the one hand with Presidents who are fervently pro-abortion – beginning with Bill Clinton – and on the other hand with Bishops who are much closer to the demands of European progressivism that is now widespread not only in France and England but also in Italy and other nations of strong Catholic tradition like Spain, Portugal, and Ireland. This rift has revealed the great distance that separates citizens from their politicians as well as the faithful from their Bishops. It is normal – and I would even say praiseworthy and providential – that in the face of betrayal by the political class and the Hierarchy there has been a re-awakening of consciences, which saw President Trump as a defender of the traditional values of the American people in whom Catholics too could place their trust. The electoral fraud of last November 3 has conversely strengthened the pactum sceleris between the deep state and the deep church, bringing a self-styled “Catholic President” to the White House who is completely subservient to globalist ideology and the plans of the New World Order, with the determined support of Bishops, intellectuals and the ultra-progressive Catholic media. The management of the pseudo-pandemic in the United States has revealed the true face of the deep church, opening the eyes of many of the faithful and making them understand the complicity that exists between the advocates of the Great Reset. When the real outcome of the Presidential election is finally revealed and new elections can be held that are not marred by interference and manipulation, Biden will also drag the American deep church along with him, giving new impetus to the social commitment of Catholics, especially among those of them who do not intend to accept adulterations of the Faith, Morals, and Liturgy of the Church.
Never before as in this period has the theme of Marian devotion been so widely talked about. The “debate” – let’s call it that – over the titles of the Blessed Virgin opened up after Bergoglio once again made comments minimizing the weight of Mary’s role as Co-Redemptrix. In order to defend the prerogatives of Mary, we recently sent to press the “Libro d’Oro di Maria Santissima [The Golden Book of Mary Most Holy].” We do not believe that Catholicism can exist without Mary; moreover, we believe that it is impossible not to identify the cause of the anti-Marian assault that we are presently experiencing in the Council and in those who managed the post-council. On the one hand using real pick-axes – both direct and indirect – through public speeches and “documents” – on the other hand allowing a neo-apparitionist sentimentality to float that appears to be the negation of the true veneration of Mary. Let’s not forget that with John Paul II on the Throne of Peter and Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, unacceptable operations in this sense were carried out – in the name of ecumenism and with the alternating plates typical of the dynamic revolution.[1] To cite just two small examples: 1. In 1996, during the 12th International Mariological Congress in Częstochowa, a group of theologians – including three Eastern “Orthodox,” an Anglican, and a Lutheran – published a declaration against the dogma of the Co-Redemption. In a perfect dialogical-indifferentist style – and this is the main point of the matter – the titles of Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate were defined as “ambiguous,” and the text was published in L’Osservatore Romano. 2. By temporarily setting aside the disastrous consequences of the “Reformation” to Marian devotion, and as if one could love Mary even as one separates her from the Mystical Body of Christ, obscuring her role as “Triumphatrix over all heresies,” John Paul II stated in the General Audience of 12 November 1997: “Luther’s writings, for example, show love and veneration for Mary, extolled as a model of every virtue: he upholds the sublime holiness of the Mother of God and at times affirms the privilege of the Immaculate Conception, sharing with other Reformers belief in Mary’s perpetual virginity.”[2] In your personal experience, how did you experience the “conciliar” decline of Marian devotion? As a prelate, what can you tell us about what you have seen in relation to this theme during your long years of service in Italy and abroad? Did the Blessed Virgin Mary play a role in your “decision of conscience” with respect to the crisis in the Church?
I agree with you on the fact that it is at least difficult to maintain that the Mystical Body can raise up liturgical prayer – which is an official, solemn, and public action – to Her Head with a double voice: this two-fold nature can signify duplicity and is repugnant to the simplicity and linearity of Catholic Truth, just as it is repugnant to God, whose Word is Eternal and is the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity. Christ cannot address the Father with a perfect voice – which the Innovators call the “Extraordinary Form” – and at the same time with an imperfect voice, winking at the enemies of God, in an “Ordinary Form.”
On the other hand, the same infelicitous expression “Ordinary Form” betrays the awareness of an “ordinariness” that in common language indicates something that is not special, something taken for granted, of little value, or of a low level: to say that a person is “ordinary” certainly does not sound like a compliment. I believe therefore that this situation must be accepted and tolerated as a transitory phase, in which certainly the traditional Liturgy has a way to return and spread itself, doing much good to souls, in view of a necessary return to the One Catholic Rite and to the indispensable abolition of its conciliar version. Let us not forget that in the Liturgy the Church addresses herself to the Majesty of God, not to men; the baptized, living members of the Church, unite together in liturgical prayer by means of the Sacred Ministers, who are “pontiffs” between them and the Most Holy Trinity. To make the liturgy into a sort of anthropocentric event is most alien to the Catholic spirit.
My reference to the Synod of Pistoia is due to the significant re-proposal of the errors condemned by the Bull Auctorem Fidei in the conciliar texts and even more so in the so-called “magisterium” of the post-council. I say significant because, just as in God the Truth is co-essential, so also lies and errors are the mark of Satan, who repeats his cry of rebellion down the centuries, always attacking the Truth that he hates with an inextinguishable hatred. From Arius to Loisy, from Luther to Fr. Martin, S.J.LGBTQ, the one who inspires it is always the same. For this reason the Church always condemns error and always affirms the same Truth, for this reason the heretics always re-propose the same errors. There is nothing new with respect to the infidelity of the people of Israel with the golden calf or the abomination of Assisi, the Pachamama, and Astana.
Almost as a final taking stock of what has been said so far, it is difficult not to enter more specifically into the theme of ecumenism that, as is noted also in the preceding questions, is closely tied with all of the aspects of the crisis we are witnessing. Present in a full-blown manner at least since the encounters of Paul VI with Athenagoras and the kiss on the foot of the “Orthodox” Melito, gradually triumphant in the various Assisi meetings in 1986 (John Paul II) and 2011 (Benedict XVI) up to the Abu Dhabi document and the pagan effigy brought into Saint Peter’s Basilica during the Amazon Synod, this indifferentist path is directly condemned – in theory and praxis – by innumerable pontifical documents (Pius XI’s Mortalium Animos, Pius X’s Pascendi and Pius IX’s Syllabus apply to everyone). Repugnant not only to the supernatural light of Faith but first of all to the natural light of reason since it is illogical, false, and perverse, it [ecumenism] has resurrected once more to flourish thanks to the open connivance of the so-called “progressives” and, unfortunately, of not a few “conservatives.” In your experience, and in particular in the different missions that you carried out on various continents, have you found – at least privately – that there is some awareness of the Episcopate on this issue? That is: behind their public “prudence” does there exist among the Clergy some who at least when the microphones are off recognize the gravity of this apostasy? If so, does this awareness seem to have grown over the years with the worsening of the acts performed?
The Bishops and priests who love Our Lord know perfectly well that there is an incurable inconsistency between the conciliar doctrine and the revealed Faith. And the mercenaries, mitered or not, who propagate error and make themselves promoters of the revolution also know it perfectly well. But while the mercenaries truly intend to change the Church in order to transform it into a sort of NGO imbued with Masonic principles, the good Pastors do not resign themselves to believing that so many failures represent, not the necessary consequence of precise errors insinuated by Vatican II, but almost an accident along the way that sooner or later will be corrected in some way. This philosophical and psychological error, even before being a theological one, leads them to hold together the matrix of the present crisis along with fidelity to the immutable Magisterium of the Church, in a titanic operation that is destined for failure because it is precisely futile and unnatural.
Allow me to make a comparison. If the doctor finds the symptoms of a specific disease, his diagnosis identifies the pathology and adopts a treatment aimed at eliminating the cause of the symptoms, not merely removing the symptoms; and least of all would he be able to cure the symptoms while refusing to connect them to the disease, because to do so would give temporary relief to his patient but would lead to his death. The same thing happens in public affairs: if a ruler finds an increase in crime due to uncontrolled immigration, he can certainly arrest the criminals, but he will not get any results if he does not stop illegal immigration. Now, if this is obvious in matters of daily life, why should it not apply further in matters that are much more grave, like those that concern the adoration due to the Majesty of God, the honor of the Church, and the salvation of souls?
I think that my Brothers ought to have the humility to recognize the deception into which they have fallen; to identify the doctrinal, moral and liturgical cause at the origin of the crisis; to turn back from the easy path that they have erroneously undertaken, in order to then resume the narrow and bristly path that they have abandoned and which over the centuries has proven to be the only viable path: the way of the Cross, of self-sacrifice, and of heroic testimony to the Truth, that is, to Jesus Christ. When this happens, the attacks of the Devil and his servants against the Church will multiply, as has always happened – “If they have persecuted me, they will persecute you also” (Jn 15:18-27) – but they shall gain Heaven and the palm of victory. Conversely, if they believe they can come to terms with the world and its prince, they will have to answer to God for the souls entrusted to them, and for their own souls as well.
This complacency towards the mentality of the age betrays perhaps a lack of courage and a certain timidity, the exact opposite of what a Catholic, and even more so a minister of God, is meant to be: “The kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent conquer it” (Mt 11:12).
Thank you so much, Your Excellency, for this conversation.
[1] It is not surprising that, following the “revolutionary” script, during this period there were also pronouncements that were “favorable” to Marian devotion, which obviously alternated with opposing practices and were inserted into a general neo-modernist context, producing the results that are now apparent.
[3] In particular one notes the passage: “Art 1. The Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI is the ordinary expression of the lex orandi (rule of prayer) of the Catholic Church of the Latin rite. The Roman Missal promulgated by Saint Pius V and revised by Blessed John XXIII is nonetheless to be considered an extraordinary expression of the same lex orandi of the Church and duly honoured for its venerable and ancient usage. These two expressions of the Church’s lex orandi will in no way lead to a division in the Church’s lex credendi (rule of faith); for they are two usages of the one Roman rite.”
Why is Francis Obsessed with Judas who is “the Embodiment of Satan” according to Doctor of the Church St. Ephrem of Syria?
The Eclectic Orthodoxy website said the Church Father and Doctor of the Church St. Ephrem the Syrian “revealed” Judas “as the embodiment of Satan: “How strong is his [Satan’s] poison, upsetting the whole world. Who can hold back the sea of that bitter one? Everyone contains drops of it that can harm you. Judas was the treasurer of his poison, And although Satan’s form is hidden, In Judas he is totally visible; Though Satan’s history is a long one, It is summed up in the Iscariot. (Hymns of Paradise XV.15)” [https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2020/04/09/judas-betrayal-and-the-despair-of-love-2/] Why is Francis obsessed with Judas?
CNN had an article titled “Why is Pope Francis so obsessed with the devil?” in which it said:
“Yet Francis refers to the devil continually. He does not believe him to be a myth, but a real person, the most insidious enemy of the church. Several of my theologian colleagues have said that he has gone a bit overboard with the devil and hell! We may be tempted to ask, why in the devil is Pope Francis so involved with the prince of demons?” [https://www.cnn.com/2015/07/20/living/pope-francis-devil/index.html]
“Why in the devil is Pope Francis so involved with the prince of demons [and Judas]?”
Maybe the famous American exorcism of “Anna Ecklund” may give us answers.
Wikipedia gives an overview of the 1928 exorcism:
The extensive exorcism resulted in deterioration of Ecklund’s body, as she refused to consume food, also vomiting foul debris and what appeared to be tobacco leaves.[10] Her head, lips, and face reportedly swelled, and she also was able to speak in multiple languages unknown to her.[11] The exorcism was reportedly so grueling, and Ecklund’s behavior so violent, that several nuns in the Franciscan order asked to be relocated to a different convent.[12][13]Ecklund was believed to be possessed by Judas Iscariot, as well as Jacob, her own father, who had cursed her with the help of his lover, her aunt Mina, for refusing his incestuous sexual advances during her adolescence.[7][11] During the exorcisms, Ecklund also spoke in a high falsetto voice, which Riesinger interpreted as the voice of her aunt Mina.[11]
On December 23, the final day of the exorcism, Father Riesinger commanded the demons in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary to depart to Hell. Ecklund collapsed on her bed and began to shriek “Beelzebub, Judas, Jacob, Mina,” followed by “Hell! Hell! Hell!” She opened her eyes, and then spoke in her own voice, saying “My Jesus, Mercy! Praised be Jesus Christ!”[14] Riesinger’s exorcism was reportedly successful, and Ecklund only exhibited “milder” and “quite manageable” possessions after it.[12] Her true identity was kept protected from the public in written accounts. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Ecklund]
A prince of the demons, Beelzebub, and Judas were involved in this most famous American case of exorcism. What information came to the exorcist and others from Beelzebub and Judas in this case and others?
The book on this exorcism, Begone Satan!, speaks of possible end time events:
“Father Th., who has had nineteen cases of possession under his care within recent years, seems convinced that present indications point to the beginning of a great battle between Christ and Antichrist. He also seems to have learned that Judas will appear as Antichrist in this manner, that a human person, soon after birth, will be controlled and completely ruled by him. Besides the Antichrist, there will be the false prophet, in reality Lucifer, who will perform wonderful deeds and false miracles. He will not be born of a woman, but will construct a body for himself out of earthly matter in order to plot as a man among men. But the faithful need not fear, for all the powers of heaven with its countless angels will be fighting on their side.” [https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/begone-satan-6067]
Demons are lairs so it is always best to take any information from them with a deep grain of salt, but it would be interesting to know if Francis has read the book Begone Satan! since he appears to be so obsessed “with the prince of demons [and Judas]?”
The Catholic website, Tradition in Action, reported that Francis’s Vatican newspaper, “L’Osservatore Romano, dedicated the first three pages of its Good Friday edition to praising Judas Iscariot” with a blasphemous semi-porn picture of “a naked Jesus bending over and tenderly ministering to a dead Judas”:
The newspaper of the Holy See, L’Osservatore Romano, dedicated the first three pages of its Good Friday edition to praising Judas Iscariot.
In a first page editorial – titled “Judas & the Scandal of Mercy” – Andrea Monda explains that the Vatican organ decided this year to honor the “most tragic and unsettling” figure of the Gospel.
The editor – probably obeying an order of Pope Francis – chose to post on its front page the reproduction of a picture, above and below first row, that presents a naked Jesus bending over and tenderly ministering to a dead Judas.
Monda explains that the author of this painting is a French Catholic who became impressed by Francis’ words praising the Traitor in his book When You Pray, Say Our Father… Morsa also reports that Francis loved this painting so much that he has placed it on the wall behind his desk along with another representing Judas…
… In the last several decades, this is the first time – as far as we know – that L’Osservatore Romano has promoted Judas Iscariot on its first three pages. It seems the inauguration of a new saint and the official launching of the “Church of Judas” on a Good Friday, the day of his betrayal…
The defense of Judas has been made in the name of the abyss of God’s mercy. So we see that now Divine Mercy, against all the Scriptural evidence, also applies to the most infamous criminal in History.
Are we far from the day when the same mercy will be applied to another Great Traitor, Satan? Does it not appear that the Vatican’s semi-official launching of the “Church of Judas” is the prelude to the coming “Church of Satan”? [https://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A930-Jud2.htm]
The Francis’s Vatican newspaper article and semi-porn picture is “a declaration that is against” Scripture and blasphemous.
The New Advent CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA explains blasphemy is “a declaration that is against faith“:
Blasphemy, by reason of the significance of the words with which it is expressed, may be of three kinds.
It is heretical when the insult to God involves a declaration that is against faith, as in the assertion: “God is cruel and unjust” or “The noblest work of man is God“.
It is imprecatory when it would cry a malediction upon the Supreme Being as when one would say: “Away with God“.
The Francis Vatican newspaper appears to be mirroring a similar non-“random” blasphemy of Joe Biden devotee Lady GaGa’s semi-porn “Judas” video where she also made “a declaration that is against” Scripture:
Lady GaGa has been criticised by a religious pressure group forher decision to retell the Bible in the video for her upcoming single ‘Judas’.
Speaking to The Sun, Bill Donohue of the Catholic League For Religious and Civil Rights branded GaGa’s use of religious icons in the video as a publicity stunt.
He said: “People have real talent, and then there is Lady GaGa. I find GaGa to be increasingly irrelevant.
“Is this the only way to jet up her performance? This isn’t random, we are getting closer to Holy Week and Easter.”
Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He want you to do next. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet
Francis Notes:
– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:
“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.” (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
– LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”
– On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”
– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
BATTY BIDENOMICS BSMake No Mistake, The “Force” is Not With Him
By E. P. Unum
Hat Tip: Rip McIntosh
The “Force” is not with Joe Biden, and probably never was. Of course, I am not talking about the “Force” of Star Wars Fame, but the U.S. work force. Yesterday we received word from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics that our economy added 266,000 jobs in April, and 40,000+ of those were federal employees. Normally, that would be a cause for some celebration, but not when we had been told by the Biden Administration that we expected to add about 1.0 million jobs in April (978,000 to be exact). The month prior, March, the economy added 770,000 jobs, short by 130,000 of the forecasted 900,000, but the media failed to mention this performance failure. So, it’s been two huge plan misses to date. But, not to fear. President Biden walked up to the microphones yesterday and announced proudly that all of this doesn’t really matter…his Great American Rescue Plan is working! I wish I had some confidence. I wish I could believe him. But he has lied so many times in the past 50 years that I cannot bring myself to do so. More importantly, I have absolutely no faith in the people with whom he has surrounded himself. Hired based on optics rather than expertise, they lie repeatedly, are not well grounded in business or economics, and lack leadership skills. Few, if any, have ever run businesses of their own or worried about making payroll. Biden emphatically stated a week ago that “the nation’s GDP grew by 6.4% in the first quarter because we were investing; that without the $4.0 trillion he wants to spend in bills he advanced we would fall way behind” This is just utter nonsense…a gross lie…and he should know better. A nation grows by virtue of expanding production of goods and services that people need, want and desire…and for which they are willing to pay. Since when is our government the catapult for such activity? Industry does this. People do this. GDP stands for Gross Domestic Product, the sum of all goods and services we produce as a nation here in the U.S. But, the sad news is what Biden and his minions believe. He even said so in his scaled-down State of the Union Speech. “It’s time everyone believed that we the people is the government” he said. He let the cat out of the bag. It’s one thing to miss the mark of adding jobs to the economy by 20,000 or 30,000. That might be understandable. But missing by almost a factor of four is grounds for getting someone axed, although that is unlikely to happen. Imagine, if you will, heading into your boss’ office carrying a report saying your division earned $266,000 in profit for the month but your own budget called for profits to be $978,000…an unfavorable profit variance of $(712,000). Kind of wrecks the company’s cash flow doesn’t it? Imagine further proudly announcing to your boss that “ he should not be concerned because your plan isworking!”. I think the reaction from your boss might be for you to start thinking about where you might be working next month. But only in the hallowed halls of government can people get away with such incompetence. Finally, it is important to remember that as of this writing, there are still 14.0 million Americans out of work and 7.4 million jobs available, and we could only add 220,000 private sector jobs in a “recovery” month! Not a good picture! Folks, the Great American Rescue Plan ain’t working. The reasons are many, but the most profound of these is the fact that the Plan, if indeed there is a plan, is built on mud. Biden’s Plan, let’s call it Bidenomics, essentially calls for growing government on the backs of business through massive increase in taxes. What Bidenomics fails to consider is that businesses will pass increased taxes along to the people who will, once again, be squeezed. Moreover, businesses will seek alternative legal ways to avoid paying taxes such as moving operations offshore, and we will find ourselves in the midst of capital flight offshore to countries offering tax incentives. To “pay” for all his spending plans and democratic give-aways, Biden has proposed a long list of burdens on business: ● Raising corporate tax rates by one-third from 21% to 28% placing us at the top of the list of countries with the highest tax rates…not an incentive for growth; ● The Bidenomics plan would provide that every American firm pay the full U.S. tax rate on overseas earnings should its management repatriate funds held abroad to say, expand domestic U.S. operations and its workforce. Another dingbat idea probably conceptualized by a Marxist. ● Bidenomics calls for a two-thirds tax hike on any capital gains made in the course of business or from investing, raising the rate from 23.8% to just a hair under 40%. What could go wrong? ● The President would disallow the common practice of real estate developers to trade properties without tax consequences and impose a capital gains tax on any such activities….even though cash does not exchange hands. Talk about disincentives, this one is baffling. ● And this one takes the cake….Biden calls for those who invest in start-ups and other forms of entrepreneurial activities…primarily hedge funds and private equity investors…to pay tax on their gains at the higher rate levied on ordinary income rather than “carried interest” at the lower capital gains rate. Entrepreneurship is the cornerstone of our success as a nation. The word comes from the French meaning “risk taking”. Care to venture a guess on what will happen to risk taking with this kind of tax disincentive? Then again, this is the very foundation of socialism…the state controls everything especially the factors of production. There is little incentive to excel or take risks in socialism. That is why socialism has never succeeded. But yet, that appears to be where we are headed. It is absurd and dangerous. Another sinkhole of Bidenomics is the $300 per week federal supplement to unemployment benefits which Biden’s “Covid Relief” package extended until September 6, 2021. A University of Chicago study found that 42% of those on unemployment are making more from the government than they did at the jobs they lost! When President Biden was asked by a reporter (a liberal reporter by the way) “whether enhanced unemployment benefits had any effect on diminishing a return to work in some categories?” he responded “No, nothing measurable.” Astounding! How many people do you think would jump at the opportunity to work a 40-hour week when they can get the same income from sitting at home watching sports on TV? The absence of common sense is puzzling. Then there is the economic concept of inflation raising its ugly head. Now, stripped of all the fancy econometric modelling and jargon, the basic definition of inflation is “too many dollars chasing too few goods”. And, thanks to all the “stimulus payments and unnecessary spending” in the Biden Plan, the U.S. future inflation gauge is on a three-decade high as consumers…you and I…are already seeing higher prices in everything from baby products to gasoline at the pump to cars. It is what happens when you pump trillions into the economy on programs that have little chance at improving production. It is also what happens when you ignore the principles of capitalism in favor of socialism. Janet Yellen, Joe Biden’s choice to head up the Federal Reserve said it very tactfully a week ago when she said “it may be that interest rates will have to rise somewhat to make sure that our economy doesn’t overheat.” Interesting comment. Got any idea what an increase of one or two percent in interest rates means to a nation with a National Debt of $30 trillion? It ain’t chump change, I can tell you that. If Biden and his acolytes really wanted to juice the economy and increase employment, he could start by getting teachers back to work…like NOW. He could and should forcefully encourage the nation’s schools to reopen five days a week immediately. Such a posture would have a giant two-fold beneficial effect. First, it would get teachers back to work and, in so doing, permit parents to get back to work as well. Not to mention the positive benefit it will have on our children. Make no mistake, we have, in my opinion, sacrificed a generation of Americans to fear of a virus whose threat to life is two tenths of one percent, and infinitesimal in terms of the health, emotional growth and education of ourchildren. If we continue down the path of Bidenomics, we will never get back to a 50 year low of 3.5% unemployment which we enjoyed under President Trump in February 2020. If we continue down the path of spending like drunken sailors on leave in Bangkok, we are, in my opinion, heading for some really tough times ahead. It occurs to me that we may not be a democracy any longer. Indeed, we may be living under a new form of government. Here it is: INEPTOCRACY – OUR NEW PRESENT FORM OF GOVERNMENTIneptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers. Yep… that’s where we are now! I have so many other things I want to share with all of you. They are, in no particular order as follows: 1. Equity versus Excellence…the Commonwealth of Virgina’s State Department of Education began a move to kill advanced math classes before the 11th grade in the name of equity. Starting in 2025-2026 the new Pathways Initiative will replace Algebra I, Algebra II and Plain Geometry with “Essential Concepts” courses where all children get taught at the same pace. Do you get it? Promote fairness by not adding opportunity, jut removing it. The legendary football coach Vince Lombardi once said “if we chase perfection, we just might catch excellence.” I guess that no longer applies anymore, or so the experts designing curriculums for our children tell us. What could possibly go wrong? 2. New York City just abolished Columbus Day and replaced it with Indigenous People Day and Italian Heritage Day. I am Italian American and proud of my heritage. No one asked me how I felt about this change; in fact, no one especially the Mayor asked anyone at all. They just did it. I will have a few things to share about this. The Mayor ain’t gonna like any of them but I will soon be writing about it. 3. If everyone is getting the Covid Vaccinations (thank you President Trump), why is it still necessary to wear masks? I haven’t heard one solid scientific explanation from the CDC, NIH, AMA, President Biden or Dr. Anthony Fauci as to why we need to continue to wear masks? I will have a few things to say about this as well. If you have a breathing disorder, like people I know, did you ever try flying commercial on a three hour flight wearing a mask every minute? How about abiding by the rules of only taking a sip of your soda or water then pulling your mask over your mouth and nose with each sip. Ridiculous just doesn’t adequately explain this nonsense. As you ponder the thoughts raised in this essay, please consider theseQuotations about lying because as sure as night follows day, the American people are being fed so many lies and falsehoods from the Great Wuhan Virus to how we are charting a course for the future. And, at the tip of the spear leading these lies and mis-directions is President Biden who is being influenced by the Great Deceiver himself, Barack Hussein Obama and his handlers Valerie Jarret and Susan Rice i.e. the Third Term of Barack Obama. ● “If you would know who controls you, see who you may not criticize.” Tacitus● “Lies are the greatest murder. They kill the truth.” Socrates● “No man has a good enough memory to become a successful liar.” Abraham Lincoln● “Breaking someone’s trust is like crumpling up a perfect piece of paper. You can smooth it over but it will never be the same again.”● “A real man will be honest no matter how painful the truth is. A coward hides behind lies and deceit.”● “Tell a lie once and all your truths become questionable.”● “If I catch you lying about a small thing, how can I trust you to tell the truth about the big things.”Thomas Jefferson As Bugs Bunny used to say…”th, th, th, that’s all folks”
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on Socrates● “No man has a good enough memory to become a successful liar.” Abraham Lincoln● “Breaking someone’s trust is like crumpling up a perfect piece of paper. You can smooth it over but it will never be the same again.”● “A real man will be honest no matter how painful the truth is. A coward hides behind lies and deceit.”● “Tell a lie once and all your truths become questionable.”● “If I catch you lying about a small thing, how can I trust you to tell the truth about the big things.”Thomas Jefferson As Bugs Bunny used to say…”th, th, th, that’s all folks”
President Biden raised more than eyebrows when he omitted any mention of God in his National Day of Prayer proclamation. What he did was unprecedented: No previous president has failed to mention God since the day it was created in 1952 by a joint resolution of Congress and signed into law by President Harry Truman. When asked about Biden’s omission, Rev. Franklin Graham was generous in his remarks. “It was probably a staff person that wrote it and maybe not even ran it by him—because I don’t think Joe Biden would have approved that one.” Maybe. Even if Graham is right, that doesn’t settle the issue. Why would a speechwriter nix God from a presidential speech about prayer? It is no secret that the Democratic Party is home to secularists. Those who have no religious affiliation, as well as agnostics and atheists, have laid anchor in the Party, many of whom are openly hostile to religion and people of faith. It is not a leap to conclude that this mentality colored Biden’s prepared remarks. Last summer, Secular Democrats of America was welcomed at the Democratic National Convention. They were given three panels to voice their concerns, and they did not hold back in lambasting Christian conservatives. At another session, held on August 18, 2020, hundreds of secular Democrats tuned in to an event hosted by this group. It featured congressmen, state lawmakers and activists: they focused on what they said were constitutional threats made by some Christians. Last fall, Humanists for Biden was established, an offshoot of Secular Democrats of America. It was headed by a professor who calls himself a chaplain, even though he is an atheist and the term chaplain refers to a clergyman. In December, Secular Democrats of America submitted a 28-page report to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris outlining their animus against religious liberty. They essentially want to secularize religious institutions, gutting most religious exemptions. Their demonization of white Christians was perhaps the most odious aspect of the report. Militant secularists have long hated the National Day of Prayer. In 2003, the American Humanist Association established a National Day of Reason; even the secular-minded media ignore it. Cribbing off the National Day of Prayer, which is celebrated on the first Thursday in May, the atheists chose the same day to mark their event. Looks like it didn’t accomplish too much this year—there were no events. “There is no specific location where this holiday is celebrated,” it said. In 2010, Freedom From Religion Foundation, a Christian-bashing atheist organization, argued in court that the National Day of Prayer was unconstitutional. It won in a district court but lost on appeal. A federal appeals court ruled that the organization lacked standing, adding that its “feeling of alienation” was not sufficient grounds to file suit. “Hurt feelings differ from legal injury,” the court said. The National Day of Prayer Task Force organizes this annual event; it is privately funded. Those who are averse to prayer are free to ignore it. But those who choose to participate are expected to pay tribute to God, which is why what President Biden did was inexplicable at best and objectionable at worst. To the extent that Biden’s remarks reflect the sentiments of those who are running the White House, this does not speak well for him or his administration. More important, it doesn’t bode well for the country. Contact White House press secretary Jen Psaki: jennifer.r.psaki@who.eop.gov Phone: 212-371-3191E-mail: pr@catholicleague.org
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on President Biden raised more than eyebrows when he omitted any mention of God in his National Day of Prayer proclamation. What he did was unprecedented: No previous president has failed to mention God since the day it was created in 1952 by a joint resolution of Congress and signed into law by President Harry Truman.
EXTERMINATION machine unmasked: Why vaccinated people are making HEALTHY people sick, Pfizer document admits vaccinated people “shed” infectious particles, the spike protein is the bioweapon
(Natural News) The vaccine is the bioweapon. Specifically, the spike protein is the bioactive weapon, and it is designed to spread from person to person, being transmissible from the vaccinated in order to infect the unvaccinated.
Never forget that Bill Gates has long wanted to use mosquitoes to carry vaccines so that people could be vaccinated against their own wishes (and completely without informed consent). Now, it turns out, they don’t need mosquitoes. They have high-obedience humans ready to carry out the same role.
People who are injected with the mRNA vaccine are having their bodies turned into bioweapons factories, churning out spike protein particles which they shed through their mouths and skin (and semen, by the way), infecting everyone around them. The spike protein is biologically active and causes blood clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, pulmonary embolism and infertility effects. Pfizer’s own documents reveal this phenomenon to be well known by vaccine developers.
This explains all the bizarre blood clotting effects now being experienced in unvaccinatedpeople who are in close proximity to vaccinated people. We will be reporting much more on this in the days ahead.
Globalists have unleashed the “final solution” self-replicating vaccine and intend to end humanity once and for all
In today’s Situation Update, I reveal how globalists have embarked on a genocidal, planet-wide extermination effort to wipe out the human race, end all nations and kill literally billions of people. The covid vaccine is the key element in this genocidal plan against humanity, and this explains why they are going to such desperate lengths to silence vaccine skeptics, censor doctors and scientists, and coerce as many people as possible into getting the vaccine injection.
Due to the transmissible nature of the spike protein and the hijacking of the body’s protein synthesis with mRNA vaccines, globalists probably only need about 50 percent of any given population to be vaccinated, and they have already achieved that goal in most nations.
They don’t even need the other half of the population to consent, because those people will be “vaccinated” with the transmission of the spike protein itself. This means nearly everyone will be infected with the spike protein, making nearly everyone susceptible to the possibility of a hyperinflammatory reaction when exposed to wild-type coronavirus strains that will be released later this year. (It’s a binary weapon system, get it?)
Hence the extreme importance of immune modulation, pursuing an anti-inflammatory diet, avoiding allergy-enhancing substances in food and medicine, etc.
The following video from Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and others explains very important concepts of how this spike protein is being transmitted by the vaccinated. Dr. Tenpenny is careful to note this isn’t the “shedding” of virus particles, but rather the “transmission” of spike protein particles based on the adenovirus that’s used to manufacture the vaccine:
Don’t miss Dr. Tenpenny’s upcoming May 8th live streaming event that reveals the 20 mechanisms of harm caused by covid vaccines. You can get details at www.DrTenpenny.com
In my Situation Update today, I go further, explaining how globalists are making a final run against humanity with planet-scale genocide based on self-replicating vaccines that are designed to spread from one person to another.
The vaccine is the pandemic. The spike protein is the bioweapon. And any person receiving the mRNA shot is having their own body transformed into a bioweapons factory that’s being exploited to infect others.
If anyone should be masked right now, it’s the people who were vaccinated. They are the super spreaders. They are the walking bio-bombs.
Effeminate Church of Francis & Cdl. Burke vs. the Fatherly Church of Bp. Gracida
A true physical or spiritual father when his children are abused or being lead on a destructive path will defend his children from the abusers or promoters of evil paths that will lead them to hell.
If he only cries because the children have been abused as Francis did with the Chilean sex abuse victims, but doesn’t defend them from the priest sex abusers and the bishops who protect them then he is not acting like a man.
Francis showed he is effeminate by not having a manly and fatherly heart that is outraged by the evil of his spiritual children being sexually abused.
Francis is not behaving like Jesus Christ who declared:
“It were better for him, that a millstone were hanged about his neck and he cast into the sea, than that he should scandalize one of these little ones.”
Former federal investigator Leon J. Podles, Ph.D., thinks that the bishops don’t behave like Jesus or even like men.
Being amazed at how bishops in the Church are effeminate, Podles wrote:
“Gilbert Kilman, a child psychiatrist, commented, ‘What amazes me is the lack of outrage the church feels when its good work is being harmed. So, if there is anything the church needs to know, it needs to know how to be outraged.'”
“Mark Serrano confronted Bishop Frank Rodimer, asking why he had let his priest-friend Peter Osinski sleep with boys at Rodimer’s beach house while Rodimer was in the next bedroom: ‘Where is your moral indignation?’”
“Rodimer’s answer was, ‘Then I don’t get it. What do you want?’ What Serrano wanted Rodimer to do was to behave like a man with a heart, a heart that is outraged by evil. But Rodimer couldn’t; his inability to feel outrage was a quality that had helped make him a bishop. He would never get into fights, never rock the boat, never ‘divide’ but only ‘unify.’” [http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-06-012-v]
Podles thinks the effeminate church began before Francis with Pope John Paul II who showed sorrow like Francis, but never behaved like a man with a heart that was outraged at the evil. He failed to remove sex abusing high ranking clerics like Fr. Marcial Maciel:
Pope Benedict XVI was the last pope to act like a man. He confronted the sex abusers and the bishops who protected them.
He had a heart of a man and true spiritual father when he showed outrage and called them “filth.” He removed the sex abuser Fr. Maciel and set up a system to remove predator priests and the bishops who protect them.
Podles shows this is how a true Catholic man and follower of Jesus Christ acts:
“Aquinas, too, says that ‘lack of the passion of anger is also a vice’ because a man who truly and forcefully rejects evil will be angry at it. The lack of anger makes the movement of the will against evil ‘lacking or weak.’ He quotes John Chrysostom: ‘He who is not angry, whereas he has cause to be, sins. For unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices, it fosters negligence, and incites not only the wicked but the good to do wrong.’” [http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-06-012-v]
Unfortunately, journalist Hilary White, on January 25, reported that Francis “has all but completely dismantled” the “effective” reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict:
“Pope Benedict installed effective procedural reforms on clerical sex abuse; Francis… has all but completely dismantled or reversed those changes… Benedict ‘had defrocked or suspended more than 800 priests for past sexual abuse between 2009 and 2012’… His reforms specifically included bishops who refused to act against priest-abusers… ‘This Pope has removed two to three bishops per month’… These reforms – and – removals – have ceased entirely under Francis.” (Remnant, “Pope Francis Accused of Inaction in Notorious Sex Abuse Cases, January 25, 2017)
Francis has acted even more effeminate than the effeminate Cardinal Bernard Law who is the media face of bishops who protect predator priests. Here is a list:
– Francis accused the victims of calumny. Law did not.
– Francis said he had not received any evidence about the sex abuse case when a member of his inner circle of nine Cardinals and chief adviser on sex abuse personally deliver a letter of evidence to the Francis. Law never did anything close to this.
– A credible victim alleged that the bishop, Francis had defended, not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which in effect is a form of sex abuse. Law never defended any priest who did such things.
– Imagine the outcry that Pope John Paul II would have had if he defended Cardinal Law if a credible victim had alleged that Law had not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which in effect is a form of sex abuse.
– Imagine the outraged that Pope John Paul II would have had if his perfect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who was Cardinal Ratzinger was Francis’s CDF perfect Archbishop Luis Ladaria Ferrer who will go to trial on April 4 in France for “complicity in alleged cover-up” of paedophile priest Fr. Bernard Preynat. (Business Standard, “French cardinal, Vatican official to stand trial for paedophile cover-up,” September 19, 2017)
– Over “1300 Catholics in Osorno [the diocese where Francis appointed Barros to be bishop], along with 30 diocesan priests, and 120 members of the Chilean Parliament sent a letter to Pope Francis urging him to rescind the appointment of Bishop Barros.”((Remnant, “Vatican Watch… So Much for Pope’s Child Protection Commission,” July 12, 2016). Francis called the Barros protesters “dumb.” Law never did anything close to this.
– Francis overturned the Pope Benedict XVI appointed CDF sex abuse ruling to bar Juan Barros from the office of bishop and then appointed him bishop of Osorno. Law never did anything close to this.
– Francis “has all but completely dismantled” the “effective” reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict. Law never did anything close to this.
Next, we get to the effeminate church both liberal and conservative.
Imagine the consensus of journalists, leftists, conservative and even abuse survivors saying that the allegations against Judge Moore were “all just about sex” and he only has a “blind spot.”
The media and leftists did this for Bill Clinton. The journalist, conservative, leftist and the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) are doing this for Francis.
National Catholic Reporter journalist and gay activist Thomas Reese as posted on the SNAP website said:
“The overwhelming consensus in the media is that Pope Francis has a blind spot when it comes to sexual abuse.” (snapnetworks.org, “Pope Francis’ blind spot on sexual abuse,” Religious News Service, January 25, 2017)
Imagine if Pope John Paul II or Pope Benedict had defended Cardinal Bernard Law, as Francis defended Barros, if a credible victim had alleged that Law had not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which is in effect a form of sex abuse.
There is no need to imagine what SNAP and the media would do. They didn’t mildly say Benedict had a “blind spot”:
In 2010, SNAP held demonstrations in front of the Vatican and the media “called for Pope Benedict’s resignation” after the New York Times made false sex abuse cover-up allegations against Pope Benedict. (PRI.org, “Italian police anticipate Vatican unrest,” March 26, 2019 & National Catholic Register, “‘The Pope Must Resign’? Bishops Respond,” March 29, 2010)
Catholic League Bill Donohue in an ad published in the New York Times in 2010 responded to the calls for the Pope to resign:
“The Times has teamed up with Jeffery Anderson, a radical lawyer who has made millions suing the Church (and greasing professional victims’ groups like SNAP), so they can weaken its moral authority. Why? Because of issues like abortion, gay marriage and women’s ordination.”
The secular media, most of the liberal and conservative Catholic media (EWTN being a exception) and SNAP are now involved in a massive covering-up for Francis.
Are the secular media, most of the Catholic media, conservatives, leftists and SNAP accomplices in Francis’s sex abuse cover-up?
If they don’t call for Francis’s resignation like they did for Benedict’s resignation then they are part of the effeminate church that doesn’t care about others.
Their “care” about the victims of sex abuse is a facade and a lie. Their hearts are centered only on their own selfishness: agenda, money or position.
Remember what Podles said about the effeminate church:
They will “never get into fights, never rock the boat, never ‘divide’ but only ‘unify.’”
Finally, we get to the effeminacy of Cardinal Raymond Burke who showed he doesn’t have a manly and fatherly heart that is outraged by the evil of his spiritual children being lead to hell.
If a father knows that his children are being taught teachings that could lead to the eternal punishment of hell, but only mildly teaches the truth without resisting those who are leading his family to hell then he is effeminate.
Cardinal Burke showed he is a member of the effeminate church when he was asked if he was “head of this ‘resistance movement'” against giving Holy Communion to the divorce and remarried (those in adulterous relationships) which Pope Francis is officially teaching. Burke said:
“We… teach the faith. We are not leading any kind of movement.” (Catholic World Report, “Cardinal Burke: It is a “source of anguish” to hear suggestions “that I would lead a schism,” January 22, 2018)
Theologian Dr. John R. T. Lamont, Ph.D., informed Burke and all the members of the effeminate church “that Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense” and what he and they need to do to be part of the masculine church:
“The AAS statement thus settles an important and much-debated question. It establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense; that is, propositions that contradict truths that are divinely revealed and that must be believed with the assent of faith. It has not only established this; it has made it a religious duty for Catholics to believe that this is the case. Pope Francis is the Pope, and as such he has the power to exercise the papal teaching authority within the limits set to that authority by divine law. In the AAS statement, he has required Catholics to give religious assent of mind and will to the assertion that Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical…”
“…It would be wrong however to think that Pope Francis is the worst scourge afflicting the Church. The election of a bad man as Pope can never be entirely ruled out. In a healthy Church the problem of a heretical Pope can and will be dealt with by the Catholic bishops, just as the immune system of a healthy body will react to disease and eradicate it. The immune system of the Church at the present is not operating. The bishops of the Catholic Church have remained silent about the heresy in Amoris laetitia, and have thereby abandoned the faithful. The heretical statements of Amoris laetitia have not been presented to the faithful as something that they can take or leave. Pope Francis has stated in official magisterial documents that they are papal teachings that they must accept. He has been supported in this by a large number of bishops. Pope Francis has thereby put pressure on all the Catholic faithful to reject divinely revealed truth. The faithful are not protected against this pressure by the bishops of Kazakhstan, or elsewhere, issuing a statement upholding the truths that Francis is denying. When encountering a difference of opinion between a papal document and a letter from a handful of Kazakh bishops, the faithful will naturally take the papal statement to be of higher authority.”
“In order to protect the faithful from the attack on their belief and salvation that is being made through Amoris laetitia, it is necessary to address the falsehoods in that document itself, and to condemn them by appealing to an authority that justifies the rejection of a non-infallible papal letter; the authority of divine revelation expressed in the Scriptures and repeated by the magisterium of the Church. This appeal does not have to be a canonical warning to Pope Francis that could serve as the first step in his deposition. Such a canonical warning would have to be addressed to the Pope himself, and warn him of the nature of his crime and the consequences of persisting in it. It would be sufficient to take the lesser step of simply addressing the faithful to condemn Amoris laetitia as heretical. Aside from Bishops Bernard Fellay and Henry Gracida, no Catholic bishops have done this.” [https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/02/important-guest-essay-meaning-of-amoris.html?m=1]
Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Rene Henry Gracida who is not a member of the effeminate church said:
“Cardinal Burke is saying… the truth. What is more important… is for people in the pew to say:
No, that is not true!”
“It’s more important for people in the pew to raise up and say in print, in letters, in phone calls, in email, in person, in interviews… for the laity to say no that is not true… than for a Burke to say this is the truth….”
“We don’t need people to say this is the truth. What we need in the present moment is for the laity to say that is not true…”
“Just like in the fourth century when those people shouted down Arius. No, you’re wrong. He is Divine… That is what we have to do today… We have to have people stand up to the homilist, priests and bishops… No, you’re wrong.”
“You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it. St Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs…”
“Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is the foundation of their faith.”
“Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse that causes them to speak out and say no:
That is not true. Don’t say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!”
“Not to sit and suffer in silence. That’s crazy. That’s weird. That’s wrong. Speak up. Resist! Object!” (Church Militant video, “Laity, Rise Up!,” April 4, 2017)
Bishop Gracida leads by example when he says: Speak up! Resist! Object!
On December 2, 2017, Gracida on his official website declared Pope Francis is teaching heresy:
“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”
My conscience is clear as I look to my Lord and my God, Jesus Christ.
I join Bishop Gracida in not a being a traitor or effeminate coward like the traitors and effeminate cowards of the fourth century Arian heresy crisis and those in our present crisis.
St. Athanasius was excommunicated by the pope for his resistance to the Arian heresy that denied Jesus was God. He never left the Church. He was not in schism.
We will not leave the Church.
We are not in schism in our resistance to the heresy and sacrilege of giving Jesus Christ who is God in the Holy Eucharist to those in adulterous relationships when they refuse to repent and stop committing adultery.
The highest rooftop I can shout from is the Catholic Monitor.
Is your conscience clear?
If your conscience is not clear then:
Speak up! Resist! Object!
Remember that there is at least one bishop in the Catholic Church who a man and a true father calling you to:
Speak up! Resist! Object!
Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He want you to do next. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet
Francis Notes:
– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:
“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.” (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
– LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”
– On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”
– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on A true physical or spiritual father when his children are abused or being lead on a destructive path will defend his children from the abusers or promoters of evil paths that will lead them to hell.
A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.
In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.
The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.
The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:
Provides immunity to the virus This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.
Protects recipients from getting the virus This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.
Reduces deaths from the virus infection This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.
Reduces circulation of the virus This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
Reduces transmission of the virus This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
The following violations of the Nuremberg Code are as follows:
Nuremberg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential
No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent. Many media, political and non-medical persons are telling people to take the shot. They offer no information as to the adverse effects or dangers of this gene-therapy. All you hear from them is – “ safe and effective” and “ benefits outweigh the risks.” Countries are using lockdowns, duress and threats to force people to take this vaccine or be prohibited to participate in free society under the mandate of a Vaccine Passport or Green Pass. During the Nuremberg trials, even the media was prosecuted and members were put to death for lying to the public, along with many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of Crimes Against Humanity.
Nuremberg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means
As listed above, the gene-therapy does not meet the criteria of a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that yield fruitful results against Covid such as Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc and boosted immune systems for flu and colds.
Nuremberg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease
This gene therapy skipped animal testing and went straight to human trials. In mRNA research that Pfizer used – a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all the monkeys developed pulmonary inflammation but the researchers considered the risk low as these were young healthy monkeys from the age of 2-4. Israel has used Pfizer and the International Court of Law has accepted a claim for 80% of the recipients having pulmonary inflammation from being injected with this gene-therapy. Despite this alarming development Pfizer proceeded to develop their mRNA for Covid without animal testing.
Nuremberg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury
Since the rollout of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in America. In the EU over 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a grievous violation of this code.
Nuremberg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur
See #4, based on fact-based medical data this gene-therapy is causing death and injury. Past research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current trial gene-experiment. A 2002 study on SARS-CoV-1 spike proteins showed they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots, and impede Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this spike-protein inheriting all these risks.
Nuremberg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit
Covid-19 has a 98-99% recovery rate. The vaccine injuries, deaths and adverse side-effects of mRNA gene-therapy far exceed this risk. The use of “leaky” vaccines was banned for agriculture use by the US and EU due to the Marek Chicken study that shows ‘hot-viruses’ and variants emerge… making the disease even more deadly. Yet, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC knowing fully the risk of new deadlier variants emerge from leaky vaccinations. The CDC is fully aware that the use of leaky vaccines facilitates the emergence of hot (deadlier)strains. Yet they’ve ignored this when it comes to human
Nuremberg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death
There were no preparations made. This gene therapy skipped animal trials. The pharmaceutical companies’ own Phase 3 human clinical trials will not conclude until 2022 /2023. These vaccines were approved under an Emergency Use only act and forced on a misinformed public. They are NOT FDA-approved.
Nuremberg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons
Politicians, media and actors claiming that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science. Many retail outlets such as Walmart & drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer experimental medical gene-therapies to the uninformed public.
Nuremberg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time
Despite the outcry of over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists and epidemiologists – the experiment is not being ended. In fact, there are currently many attempts to change laws in order to force vaccine compliance. This includes mandatory and forced vaccinations. Experimental ‘update’ shots are planned for every 6 months without any recourse to the growing number of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment. These ‘update’ shots will be administered without any clinical trials. Hopefully this new Nuremberg Trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.
Nuremberg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death
It is clear in the statistical reporting data that this experiment is resulting in death and injury yet all the politicians, drug companies and so-called experts are not making any attempt to stop this gene-therapy experiment from inflicting harm on a misinformed public.
What can you do to help put an end to this crime against humanity? Share this information. Hold your politicians, media, doctors and nurses accountable – that if they are complicit in this crime against humanity they too are subject to the laws set forth in the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Code and can be tried, found guilty and put to death. Legal proceedings are moving forward, evidence has been collected and a large growing body of experts are sounding the alarm.
Visit the Covid Committee website at: https://corona-ausschuss.de/ and if you have been affected by this crime, report the event, persons involved, and as much detail to the following website:
Crimes against humanity affect us all. They are a crime against you, your children, your parents, your grandparents, your community and your country and your future
/930_Jud-4.png)
8:47 PM (2 minutes ago)
ABYSSUS ABYSSUM INVOCAT / DEEP CALLS TO DEEP 
You must be logged in to post a comment.