the DAILY KNIGHT

Holy Week Reflection on the Cross of Christ

David Martin | The Daily KnightChrist at Calvary, Bartolomé Esteban Murillo

Holy Week is a time to renew our baptismal calling to fast from the world and to draw closer to Christ. It’s a time to put aside the fools-gold of this world and embrace the true gold of Heaven so we can be eternally enriched.

Unfortunately, many today are running head-long into sin, seeking wealth, pleasures, and worldly plaudits, forgetting that all worldly gain, be it wealth, acclaim, popularity, or honorary titles, will avail them nothing in the end. Christ came to deliver us from these vices that we might walk at liberty in him, so it is vain for Christians to put stock in worldly pursuits.

St. John the evangelist tells us, “Love not the world, nor the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” (1 John 2:15) The Apostle James reminds us that “the friendship of this world is the enemy of God” (James 4:4), yet people forfeit the friendship of God just to gain the friendship of the world.

Christ’s Doctrine

The essence of Christ’s doctrine is that we die to the world and join with Him on the cross. This teaching is beautifully expressed by the Apostle Paul where he says, “I am nailed to the cross with Christ.” (Gal. 2:19) To not participate in the cross is to not reap eternal life. To endure the suffering of the cross is necessary for salvation, as taught by the Savior Himself: “Whosoever does not carry his cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple.” (Matthew 14:27)

Christ came to deliver us from the world and to call us home to His Everlasting Kingdom, but this will be done through the cross. He went before us to open the way, but His Sacrifice avails us nothing if we don’t follow Him. The way to Heaven is to strip oneself of worldly interest and to press after Christ with our cross, in keeping with the words of St. Paul: “I suffer the loss of all things, and count them as dung, that I may gain Christ.” (Philippians 3:8)

The Cross of Persecution

The Apostle assures us that “all that will live godly in Christ Jesus, shall suffer persecution“ (2 Timothy 3:12), but it is the cross of persecution that procures the greatest blessings. “Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for My sake: Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in Heaven.” (Matt. 5: 11,12) We are called to join with Christ and to endure the rejection of the world, remembering the words of the Savior, “If the world hate you, know that it has hated Me before you.” (John 15:18)

The world will reject this truth, as it has for 2000 years, though this rejection has reached unparalleled heights at this last hour. If we have apostasy today it’s because of the present-day revolt against the cross. And what is the cross but the Sacrifice of Calvary planted in our midst—the Mass.

The Mass is Calvary Planted in our Midst

Christ underwent His Sacrifice on Good Friday, but at the Last Supper He instituted this Sacrifice as an ongoing Sacrifice that would continue in perpetuity. The Mass is not a symbol or mere commemoration of Calvary, but is the actual Sacrifice of Calvary reenacted on the altar, though it be mystical and unbloody. Each Mass is one and the same Sacrifice, not many. The priest is merely the instrument used (Alter Christus) through whom Christ daily perpetuates His Sacrifice among us.

Hence Christ has planted His death in our midst, which is why the Crucifix is above the main altar in the churches, since it reminds us of what we are attending. St. Paul says that each time the priest follows the commemorative formula of Christ to elevate the bread and chalice, he shows forth “the death of the Lord.” (1 Cor. 11:26)

Some will say, “Why does Christ want to come and die among us?” The answer is because He loves us and He wants us to die with Him. In our baptism we are baptized into Christ’s death (Romans 6:3). Through our baptism we take on the robes of the Passion and walk the path of mortification, because we are members of His Body and are called to be one with Him. That is, we die with Him—we die to self and sin, we die to the elements of the world.

Jesus foretold His Passion and death when He said, “The hour is come, that the Son of Man should be glorified.” He went on to say that those who follow Him into death will keep their life eternally. “Unless the grain of wheat falling into the ground die, it remains alone. But if it die, it brings forth much fruit. He that loves his life shall lose it; and he that hates his life in this world, keeps it unto eternal life.” (John 12:24,25)

The Mass summons us to participate in Christ’s Sacrifice and to meditate on His death. Through the Mass Christ draws us into union with His own sufferings, that through these sufferings we might be purified of our defects and be united more closely with Him.

True Active Participation of the Faithful

In this manner we have our “active participation” in Christ. All the busy-body activity since Vatican II is but a farce and a trick of the devil to pump people up with pride so they can feel important. This robs them of their true participation in Christ. Active Participation means picking up our cross and suffering with Christ. It means contrition for sin and amendment of life. It means shunning human encounter and remaining dead to the world.

The Mass then is Christ’s way of sanctifying His people that they may learn to die to the world and walk with Him in the way of the cross. This will explain why the devil unleashes so much fury against the cross, because the cross is our salvation. Satan’s work is to turn the world against the cross, evidenced by the ungodly changes we have seen since Vatican II. What we have witnessed since the Council is a conspiracy to discredit the Mass with change so that people will leave the Church and not be associated with Christ on the Cross.

Turning Modernism on Satan’s Head

Making the Church ugly with change was part of Satan’s plan to drive the good Catholics from the Church, but today’s sacrilege nonetheless provides an excellent meditation for the spiritual man who meditates frequently on the Passion. For while it was never deemed that Jesus Christ be re-crucified in His Church, today’s sacrilegious scenario can be turned on the devil’s head and used to deepen our meditation on the Passion, and thus advance our union with Christ.

For the ostentatious body exposure of lewd women in Church are the insulting scourges that violently beat and lacerate Our Lord’s pure body. The denials and false protestations coming forth from the pulpit are the sharp thorns that modernists are driving into Our Lord’s Sacred Head with the mallet of their intellectual pride. The excessive talking and celebrating in Church is a replay of the jeering crowd that danced around the cross, as they too celebrated that the suffering Jesus was finally done away with.

And as in Jesus’ time, so it is today that the high priests are the ones stirring up the people against the cross of Christ. The Mystical Body is truly passing through its Passion, but the followers of Christ needn’t despair because Christ has given them the remedy to triumph in this battle, namely, the cross. The standard of the cross has been the victory of the saints and martyrs down through the ages.

Christ is Invincible

If there is one lesson we learn from The Passion of the Christ, it is that Jesus Christ can take a punch. When they stripped Him of His garments and cloaked Him with a dirty purple rag, He didn’t drop dead with the first blow but endured many hours of abuse.

Likewise, when modernist innovators stripped Christ of His royal, liturgical garments (TLM) and cloaked him with a dirty Novus Ordo rag, he didn’t automatically expire but has continued with us, fulfilling His promise that He would remain with His Church “even to the consummation of the world.” (Matt. 28:20)

The faithful of the last times are called to join with Christ at His tabernacle, in imitation of the Blessed Virgin and St. John who remained at the foot of the cross amidst the turmoil and sacrilege. Their example sets the stage for the true apostles of the last days who are laboring to remain faithful under siege. Fleeing the cross and hiding underground accomplishes nothing! Loyal Catholics are called to defend Christ in their parish churches and not leave Him hanging before His enemies. We are called to share in his cross, so that we can one day share in His resurrection. “If we suffer, we shall also reign with him.” (2 Tim. 2:12)

Let us resolve to do just that, being confident that this royal way of the cross is the holy path marked out by the Savior that will lead us directly to the Kingdom of Heaven.

“My Kingdom is not of this world” — John 18:36

Tags:

• Jesus Christ
• cross
• holy week
• catholic
• catholicism
• catechism

the DAILY KNIGHT

Was the New Mass Really from Pope Paul VI?

David Martin | The Daily KnightNovus Ordo Missae (OnePeterFive)

Pope Paul VI was perhaps the most exploited pope of history who was blamed for the problems that were advanced in his name. As with the French Revolution, the liturgical revolution of Vatican II was generated by infiltrated Freemasons, but like Queen Antoinette, Pope Paul was the scapegoat that bore the blame for the revolution. For while he made some mistakes, they were minor and made with good intent.

While Pope Paul VI is generally seen as the architect of the New Mass of Vatican II, it’s important to point out that the outline for the Novus Ordo was in the works long before he became pope, i.e. since 1960. The infamous new draft was principally the work of Msgr. Annibale Bugnini who had long been suspected of Freemasonry, and unfortunately his draft was approved by the Preparatory Commission on the Liturgy even before Pope John XXIII had a chance to learn of it. (Fr. Ralph Wiltgen, the Rhine Flows into the Tiber)

The outline, known also as the “Bugnini Draft,” would dominate the discussions in the opening session of Vatican II (1962-1965), after which it would formally be adopted as the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy on December 7, 1962. The Constitution would serve as the blueprint for the New Mass to be implemented after the Council, which would be dubbed the Mass of Pope Paul VI.

Hence the blueprint for the “Mass of Pope Paul VI” was finalized and adopted six months before Paul VI was even elected. The pope authored none of it. (Michael Davies, How the Liturgy Fell Apart: The Enigma of Archbishop Bugnini)

Pope Paul Never Abrogated the Old Mass

It should also be pointed out that while Paul VI is often accused of imposing the New Mass, he never forbade the Old Mass. In 1986, a panel of nine Vatican cardinals concluded that Pope Paul VI never abrogated the Mass of Pius V, nor did he mandate the New Mass, nor did he grant bishops the right to forbid or restrict priests from saying the Tridentine Latin Mass. Pope John Paul II had commissioned the cardinals to look into the legal status of the old Mass, as it was his intention to bring its legality to light.

If Pope Paul had truly mandated the New Mass, he would have specified this, but this was never done. Pius V, on the contrary, laid down the law with his subjects, saying, “We order them in virtue of holy obedience to chant or to read the [Tridentine] Mass according to the rite and manner and norm herewith laid down by Us.” He said: “Let Masses not be sung or read according to any other formula than that of this Missal published by Us” mandating that “This new rite alone is to be used.” (Quo Primum, July 14, 1570)

Nowhere in the 1969 Missale Romanum does it mandate that the New Mass must be said. The document merely mandates the publication of the new missal, ordering that “the prescriptions of this Constitution go into effect [are validated] November 30th of this year” and that it “be firm and effective now and in the future.” But there is no mention of its use.

The decree then validates and makes available the new missal for those who want it, i.e. it is an indult. A Traditionalist priest of the Society of St. Pius X, Father Francois Laisney, points out that “Pope Paul VI did not oblige the use of his [new] Mass, but only permitted it…. There is no clear order, command, or precept imposing it on any priest!” According to Fr. Laisney, the same applies to subsequent decrees on the New Mass, including the 1971 Notification from the Congregation of Divine Worship, of which he says: “One cannot find in this text any clear prohibition for any priest to use the traditional Mass nor an obligation to celebrate only the New Mass.”

Father Laisney speaks a pure sentence. In order for a mandate to exist it must be stated what the mandate is. If a revision is going to be imposed on the universal Church that will alter the worship of millions, it needs to be spelled out in clear, juridical terms. Without this there is no mandate.

Be that as it may, Pope Paul VI did sign for the New Mass in April 1969, which was a mistake on his part. Though the Novus Ordo was not his design, he unfortunately gave in and yielded to the wishes of those who had proposed and designed it, namely, Monsignor Bugnini and his clique.

Perfidious Murmurings

Even so, the pope grew increasingly disturbed at discussions circulating about new formulas for the Mass that were surfacing more and more at Vatican II. Though he had initially reposed hope in the “reform,” even contributing somewhat, he was never attempting to breach tradition or invent a new Mass, nor did he agree with the new formulas being proposed.

On September 3, 1965, Pope Paul said:

“There are some who with reference either to Masses which are celebrated in private, or to the Dogma of Transubstantiation, or to devotion to the Eucharist, spread abroad opinions which disturb the faithful and fill their minds with no little confusion about matters of faith. It is as if everyone were permitted to consign to oblivion doctrine already defined by the Church.”

The pope was refuting Vatican infidels who mocked the Mystery of Faith as superstition and who were opposed to the idea of private Masses. According to these secular humanists, Mass was not Mass unless it was an occasion of festive human encounter, to which Pope Paul sharply disagreed, saying, “It is not allowable to emphasize what is called the ‘communal’ Mass to the disparagement of Masses celebrated in private.… Nor is it allowable to discuss the Mystery of Transubstantiation without mentioning what the Council of Trent stated about the marvelous conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the Body and of the whole substance of the wine into the Blood of Christ.”

The pope also refuted those who spoke of “transignification” and “transfinalization” and who proposed “the opinion according to which, in the Consecrated Hosts which remain after the celebration of the Sacrifice of the Mass, Christ Our Lord is no longer present.” He warned that “the spread of these and similar opinions does great harm to the faith and devotion to the Divine Eucharist,” stating that “we cannot approve the opinions which they express, and we have the duty to warn you about the grave danger which these opinions involve for correct faith.”

It was in his encyclical “Mysterium Fidei” that these concerns were addressed. Therein he opposed the liturgical reform as it was being proposed and upheld the Tridentine formula of the Mass, arguing that it alone should be used in the Roman Rite for proposing the Mystery of Faith.

The point of the encyclical was to bring into focus the sublime mystery of the Holy Eucharist as the center-piece of our Faith and how the Church may never resort to flippant or careless wording in proposing such mysteries, lest we give rise to irreverent and scandalous notions about the Holy Sacrifice (e.g. the Eucharist is holy bread, the Mass is a meal, the Mass is a community gathering, the Mass is a celebration, etc.) With this premise being established, he goes on to say:

“The Church, therefore, with the long labor of centuries and the help from the Holy Ghost has established a rule of language [Tridentine Liturgy], confirming it with the authority of the Councils. This rule which has often been the watchword and banner of orthodox Faith must be religiously preserved …. Let no one presume to change it at his own pleasure or under the pretext of new knowledge. Who would ever tolerate that the dogmatic formulas used by the ecumenical councils for the mysteries of the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation be judged as no longer appropriate for men of our times and therefore that other formulas be rashly substituted for them? In the same way, it cannot be tolerated that any individual should on his own authority modify the formulas used by the Council of Trent to propose the Eucharistic Mystery for our belief …. These formulas are adapted to all men of all times and all places.” (Pope Paul VI, Mysterium Fidei, September 3, 1965)

Clearly, the pope was against the changes in the Mass, but there was little he could do about it since the plan to change the Mass was in full swing and trying to halt it was almost like trying to halt a run-away locomotive going downhill. And whereas the pope did sign for the New Mass, he did so under constraint.

Pope Paul Buckled Under

The pope’s performance during this time was certainly not perfect, but by being pressured by innovators who were trying to exact reforms and signatures out of him, he eventually buckled, but in his heart he knew the changes were wrong and that they would rob the Church of its participation in the Mystery of Faith that it had enjoyed through the ages. Consider his lamentation over the coming promulgation of the New Mass which he delivered at the General Audience of November 26, 1969:

“Newness is going to be noticed, the newness of language. No longer Latin, but the spoken language will be the principal language of the Mass. The introduction of the vernacular will certainly be a great sacrifice for those who know the beauty, the power, and the expressive sacrality of Latin. We are parting with the speech of the Christian centuries; we are becoming like profane intruders in the literary preserve of sacred utterance. We will lose a great part of that stupendous and incomparable artistic and spiritual thing, the Gregorian chant. We have reason for regret, reason almost for bewilderment. What can we put in the place of that language of the Angels? We are giving up something of priceless worth. But why? What is more precious than these loftiest of our Church’s values?”

Clearly Pope Paul did not like the direction the Church was moving in, as we also see expressed in his lamentation at the close of Vatican II:

“Profane and secular humanism has revealed itself in its terrible, anticlerical stature, and in one sense has defied the Council. The religion of God made man has met the religion of man who makes himself God.” (December 7, 1965)

The Holy Father also said in 1970, “In many areas the Council has not so far given us peace but rather stirred up troubles and problems that in no way serve to strengthen the Kingdom of God within the Church or within its souls.” (Abp. Lefebvre, Open Letter to Confused Catholics)

It was on June 29, 1972, that Pope Paul let out with his historic S.O.S. as to why Vatican II failed, when he declared: “From some fissure the smoke of Satan entered into the temple of God.”

Five years later, on the 60th Anniversary of the Virgin Mary’s last apparition at Fatima, the pope enlarged on this when he said:

The tail of the devil is functioning in the disintegration of the Catholic world. The darkness of Satan has entered and spread throughout the Catholic Church even to its summit. Apostasy, the loss of the Faith, is spreading throughout the world and into the highest levels within the highest levels within the Church. (October 13, 1977)

What the pope was giving us was the gist of the Third Secret of Fatima, namely, that Satan would subvert the Church’s ruling body and use it to execute this latter-day misguidance of the Church.

Let it suffice to say that Paul VI was not the flaming modernist that many see him as but was rather a very Marian pope, which is the truest mark of Catholicity. In rebuttal to progressivists that had attacked him at Vatican II over his position on Mary’s Divine Motherhood and Mediatrixship, the pope on November 21, 1964 solemnly declared Mary the Mother of the Church and issued a historic statement on Mariology to the great consternation of his foes. We conclude with this excerpt that it might place his integrity into focus and provide a wholesome meditation for readers as they contemplate the papal mystery of Paul VI.

“Predestined from eternity by that decree of divine providence which determined the incarnation of the Word to be the Mother of God, the Blessed Virgin was on this earth the Virgin Mother of the Redeemer, and above all others and in a singular way the generous associate and humble handmaid of the Lord. She conceived, brought forth and nourished Christ. She presented Him to the Father in the temple, and was united with Him by compassion as He died on the Cross. In this singular way she cooperated by her obedience, faith, hope and burning charity in the work of the Saviour in giving back supernatural life to souls. Wherefore she is our mother in the order of grace.” (Lumen Gentium)

UPDATE:

h[edit]

Bugnini died of natural causes at the Pope Pius XI Clinic in Rome on 3 July 1982.^[12]

His detailed account of the work to which he devoted most of his career, The Reform of the Liturgy 1948-1975, appeared posthumously. An English translation appeared in 1990.

Allegation[edit]

The oft-repeated allegation of Bugnini’s being a Freemason was first made in print by Italian essayist Tito Casini in his book Nel Fumo di Satana. Verso l’ultimo scontro (Florence: Il carro di San Giovanni, 1976). Casini claimed that according to an anonymous source, Bugnini left a briefcase in a conference room. When someone found it and attempted to identify the owner, incriminating documents were within. English writer Michael Davies claimed that Pope Paul VI’s sending of Bugnini to Iran as nuncio was due to this alleged revelation of Bugnini’s Masonic affiliation,^[13] though the task of his post-Vatican II congregation had just been completed (supra). Davies further claimed that an unnamed, conservative Cardinal had told him in the summer of 1975 that he’d “seen (or placed) on the pope’s desk” a “dossier” containing evidence of Bugnini’s Freemason connection.^[2]

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

McCarrick Protected “Gravely Sinful” Joe Biden

April 01, 2021

Sexual predator ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick protected Joe Biden when then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later to be Pope Benedict XVI) wrote that bishops were not to admit to Communion politicians like “gravely sinful” Biden who supports the killing of unborn babies.

McCarrick lied for politicians like Biden by ignoring the important parts of the Ratzinger letter and told bishops not to obey or ignore the Catholic Church law.

Last year, Fr. Robert Morey denied Holy Communion to the “gravely sinful” Biden following a “2004 decree signed jointly by the bishops of Atlanta, Charleston, and Charlotte”:

“In denying Biden communion, [Fr.] Morey was following a diocesan policy set forth in a 2004 decreesigned jointly by the bishops of Atlanta, Charleston, and Charlotte. The decree states that supporting pro-abortion legislation is ‘gravely sinful’ and that public figures who do so must be denied communion until they repent.”
[https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/10/31/cardinal-dolan-on-biden-communion-denial-i-wouldnt-do-it/]

 Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1 – A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1 What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1] 
Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it. Pray an Our Father now for America. Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

While America Sleeps

 By Theodore Wilson

April 1, 2021 

Hat Tip: Rip McIntosh

Have you ever had the feeling of impending doom? Information that falls through the cracks of censorship that stimulates a little anxiety. While we watched our cities burn during the summer of 2020, the arsonists were consoled. When the November election results appeared to be rigged, suddenly we felt very insecure. Joe Biden abolished border restrictions and immigration began to resemble the Woodstock Concert. Foreign countries have laughed at us.  While most of America sleeps, we have a vigorous contest going on to determine the fate of the United States.  Many people seem to think that “things will work themselves out.” The reality of today’s political scene is two groups fighting for supremacy to determine whether America will become a communist country or remain a free republican form of government. The seeds of this war were ignited in elite American universities, in books and teachings of agnostic professors who laid out the concepts of the critical race theory, systemic prejudice, stem culture, affinity groups, socialism, and identity politic doctrines creating sparks that ignited a revolutionary fire.  We now have a coalition of marginalized groups such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the Climate Change Coalition, the American Communist Party, and they have partnered with a handful of billionaires who are members of the Global Elite that we refer to as the Deep State.  The marginalized believe only they understand justice and know who deserves “what.” They believe they are intellectually superior because they understand the white superstructure, the nature of privilege, and they view the system that America was founded on as racist, unjust, and evil. All whites who define the oppressive group can only sympathize, and will never understand their needs. This coalition mirrors the army formed in China when Mao, the communist. and Chaing Kai-Shek, traditional Chinese, that united to fight the Japanese. After WWII ended, they split and fought for control of the Chinese Government.  The marginalized are Black and the Deep State White. They bonded over the same objective, a new world order under a one-party system, and have accomplished their first goal, control of the Chafing Democratic Party and the Federal government. Those two groups will split after they defeat the advocates of freedom, and fight to determine the permanent champion. To defeat the advocates of freedom, the coalition must achieve the next two goals simultaneously: total control over the people and dissolution of the U.S. Constitution. They are succeeding, but it must be accomplished before the midterm elections of 2022, or they will lose the revolution at the voting polls. In the end, the marginalized and the deep state will separate and go to war to determine the final winner of the United States. This new government will have to face off against the Chinese Communist Party, although the American Communist Party has already pledged their allegiance to them. Control over the people consists of forbidding freedom of speech and destruction of open elections. H.R.-1 will give the Democratic Party permanent control over election results and this bill breezed through the Democratic House of Representatives and edges toward reality. What will censorship accomplish? In dictatorship allow only one truth and one law, no discussion, because dictators suppress thoughts and speech. Your mind belongs to the government, and it constitutes what is good. To accomplish this, culture must be canceled along with traditional values, and the history of the past.  Since the Deep State has the ability to control everything you see and hear, they can do what the constitution does not allow Congress: censorship, restricted access to information, and the elimination of rational opposition through misinformation, as well as cancel culture.  We watched the media chastise, humiliate, mock, and ridicule Donald Trump from the moment he took the oath of office. They suppressed discussion of the election fraud, labeled Trump supporters as terrorists, and have carefully avoided any positive information supportive of conservative politicians.  My dear friend, Andrew Jennings, once told me that nearly half of all the international investigative reporters were assassinated. That was 1996, just four years after he published The New Lords of the Rings that exposed the corruption of the International Olympic Committee. It was an era when journalists believed that they could dramatically improve the world by exposing evil and corruption through the craft of writing. He dedicated that book to Dimitri Krikoriants, a writer who was gunned down on his mother’s doorstep. A long list of famous writers in the United States have similar records. They exposed in clear graphic terms the evils they found in politics and the business world. Thomas Nast exposed the Democratic Political Machine of New York, Ida M. Tarbell revealed the monopoly of Standard Oil, Upton Sinclair described the unsanitary practices of meatpacking plants, just a few of a long list of writers who were dedicated to making the world better.  A multitude of journalists labored tirelessly to publish articles in magazines, newspapers, and periodicals based on truth, honesty, and integrity. Their work provided credibility and respect to the craft of journalism.   Gradually the media grew, first radio, then television, now the Internet. They entertained the world, expanded our knowledge, and brought people closer together. But then, the accumulation of massive wealth gradually ate away the good character of the media. A handful of people bought everything, from the small businesses to the major companies, and this small elite group became a powerful force. The Deep State destroyed the craft of journalism. They now control what you are exposed to, what you will see, how you will understand it, and what you will not be allowed to know. Truth, honesty, and integrity have now become forbidden because your mind belongs to them.  Most journalists no longer practice the crafts of their professional. The controlling stockholders and CEOs, the dark forces underground, manipulate journalists and commentators that have become intellectual whores who sold their talents to meet the needs of a handful of billionaires in control mainstream media.  Rachel Maddow, award-winning MSNBC nightly news television host, currently campaigns for signatures on a petition, and requests donations to the Committee to Stop Republicans that want Donald Trump imprisoned for his crimes. The Democrats in Congress, led by Rep. Mike Doyle, are pushing for Facebook, Google, and Twitter to increase their censorship. They need Trump gone, and conservatives permanently silenced. Democratic leaders in Congress formally launched a war against the majority of the middle class when they submitted a 28-page document to the Biden-Harris Administration demanding a crackdown of Conservative Christians. It included the removal of all Christians from public office and the re-education of Trump voters. At the Democratic National Convention, they omitted “God” from the pledge of allegiance. Christianity, as they see it, must be abolished. Black Lives Matter leader, Shaun King, called for the destruction of churches and all artwork of Jesus, and he shouted, “They are the symbol of ‘White Supremacy’.” Catholic Churches have been burnt, many have been vandalized across the country, and church services disrupted by leftist mobs. The mayor of Huston, TX, launched a campaign against Christians and issued subpoenas to every Catholic priest demanding copies of their sermons. In a United States Marine manual, the military has classified Catholics and Evangelical Christians as religious extremists along with the KKK, Al-Qaeda, and Hamas who use or advocate violence to accomplish their objectives. They are in good company. The Department of Defense included veterans of the Armed Forces because of their involvement in the January 6 Insurrection. The Democratic Party’s war on Christians has been suppressed by the Deep State Media. Why? How many Christians would vote for a Democratic candidate if they knew this, and how many White voters would advocate for Black Lives Matter by putting signs in their yard? Surprised that the media has ignored the Uyghur Holocaust in China? Thousands of Chines Islamic followers were rounded up and stuffed into 280 concentration camps. Why? The Koran contains the Old Testament, identical to Jews and Christians. Once you dehumanize the enemy, it makes it easier to kill them. It happened in Nazi Germany, and now in China. While these people suffer in labor camps and are subjected to beatings and rape, our media has turned its back, it does not want to disrupt the purchase of Chinese products in American stores. In other words, the mainstream media no longer reports the truth.  They establish the narrative and what you are allowed to read and discuss. If you are outside the box, you are a heretic and can be punished for your point of view or opinion on the matter.  The fate of our country depends on the ability to discuss. If we are going to be part of a world that rules, then we must have freedom of speech to work things out. Freedom of the mind allows us to search for the truth, provides openness to the soul, gives us the ability to rationalize, and talk about it.  While America sleeps, the marginalists are educating your children, gaslighting them to despise themselves and renounce their oppressive identity. They are transforming White culture by altering society’s images in movies, commercials, sitcoms, advertisements, everywhere. They are the heroes; the Whites are the oppressors. Either the Constitution survives, or tyranny prevails.  This struggle has already become violent. Kamala Harris praised the riots, arsons, and looting. “They are essential for the evolution of our country,” she said. The marginals have proven they are ready for a full-scale oppressive war. Sleeping Americans need to awaken. Tyranny is when you are dehumanized and control of your thinking process has been taken away. Numbers determine power. Today we are losing, tomorrow we can defeat the Democratic Party Left. We fought to free the slaves, won civil rights, and almost every one of our laws protects us from discrimination. Every ethnic group and religion has been elected to local, state, and federal governments as members of both political parties. They intermarry and live in a vast number of neighborhoods in every state. They establish deep friendships and working relationships. We call this group the melting pot. Asiatic, Blacks, and Whites who espouse the values of faith, family, and freedom, elements that made America the greatest nation on earth, must join hands and stand up against communism if we want to live in a free country. Those are the stakes. Together as a nation of one people, we can chart a course of optimism and hope.  How this country ends up will be decided by the decision to unite. We have at hand, non-violent alternatives that will defeat the Democratic Party Leftist.  Christian Democrats in Congress like Rep. Emanual Cleaver, the Pastor of a Methodist Church in Kansas City, Mo, need to wake up and take a stand against communists who oppose religion. They need to take the lead in opposition against the Chinese holocaust of Islamic and Christian faith. Americans who support freedom have the ability to boycott Chinese products and any company that relies on Chinese factories for profit.  We must abandon institutions that practice censorship and support freedom of speech, like Facebook and Twitter, and withdraw from colleges and school districts that seek to cancel culture.

While America Sleeps

 By Theodore Wilson

April 1, 202

 Have you ever had the feeling of impending doom? Information that falls through the cracks of censorship that stimulates a little anxiety. While we watched our cities burn during the summer of 2020, the arsonists were consoled. When the November election results appeared to be rigged, suddenly we felt very insecure. Joe Biden abolished border restrictions and immigration began to resemble the Woodstock Concert. Foreign countries have laughed at us.  While most of America sleeps, we have a vigorous contest going on to determine the fate of the United States.  Many people seem to think that “things will work themselves out.” The reality of today’s political scene is two groups fighting for supremacy to determine whether America will become a communist country or remain a free republican form of government. The seeds of this war were ignited in elite American universities, in books and teachings of agnostic professors who laid out the concepts of the critical race theory, systemic prejudice, stem culture, affinity groups, socialism, and identity politic doctrines creating sparks that ignited a revolutionary fire.  We now have a coalition of marginalized groups such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the Climate Change Coalition, the American Communist Party, and they have partnered with a handful of billionaires who are members of the Global Elite that we refer to as the Deep State.  The marginalized believe only they understand justice and know who deserves “what.” They believe they are intellectually superior because they understand the white superstructure, the nature of privilege, and they view the system that America was founded on as racist, unjust, and evil. All whites who define the oppressive group can only sympathize, and will never understand their needs. This coalition mirrors the army formed in China when Mao, the communist. and Chaing Kai-Shek, traditional Chinese, that united to fight the Japanese. After WWII ended, they split and fought for control of the Chinese Government.  The marginalized are Black and the Deep State White. They bonded over the same objective, a new world order under a one-party system, and have accomplished their first goal, control of the Chafing Democratic Party and the Federal government. Those two groups will split after they defeat the advocates of freedom, and fight to determine the permanent champion. To defeat the advocates of freedom, the coalition must achieve the next two goals simultaneously: total control over the people and dissolution of the U.S. Constitution. They are succeeding, but it must be accomplished before the midterm elections of 2022, or they will lose the revolution at the voting polls. In the end, the marginalized and the deep state will separate and go to war to determine the final winner of the United States. This new government will have to face off against the Chinese Communist Party, although the American Communist Party has already pledged their allegiance to them. Control over the people consists of forbidding freedom of speech and destruction of open elections. H.R.-1 will give the Democratic Party permanent control over election results and this bill breezed through the Democratic House of Representatives and edges toward reality. What will censorship accomplish? In dictatorship allow only one truth and one law, no discussion, because dictators suppress thoughts and speech. Your mind belongs to the government, and it constitutes what is good. To accomplish this, culture must be canceled along with traditional values, and the history of the past.  Since the Deep State has the ability to control everything you see and hear, they can do what the constitution does not allow Congress: censorship, restricted access to information, and the elimination of rational opposition through misinformation, as well as cancel culture.  We watched the media chastise, humiliate, mock, and ridicule Donald Trump from the moment he took the oath of office. They suppressed discussion of the election fraud, labeled Trump supporters as terrorists, and have carefully avoided any positive information supportive of conservative politicians.  My dear friend, Andrew Jennings, once told me that nearly half of all the international investigative reporters were assassinated. That was 1996, just four years after he published The New Lords of the Rings that exposed the corruption of the International Olympic Committee. It was an era when journalists believed that they could dramatically improve the world by exposing evil and corruption through the craft of writing. He dedicated that book to Dimitri Krikoriants, a writer who was gunned down on his mother’s doorstep. A long list of famous writers in the United States have similar records. They exposed in clear graphic terms the evils they found in politics and the business world. Thomas Nast exposed the Democratic Political Machine of New York, Ida M. Tarbell revealed the monopoly of Standard Oil, Upton Sinclair described the unsanitary practices of meatpacking plants, just a few of a long list of writers who were dedicated to making the world better.  A multitude of journalists labored tirelessly to publish articles in magazines, newspapers, and periodicals based on truth, honesty, and integrity. Their work provided credibility and respect to the craft of journalism.   Gradually the media grew, first radio, then television, now the Internet. They entertained the world, expanded our knowledge, and brought people closer together. But then, the accumulation of massive wealth gradually ate away the good character of the media. A handful of people bought everything, from the small businesses to the major companies, and this small elite group became a powerful force. The Deep State destroyed the craft of journalism. They now control what you are exposed to, what you will see, how you will understand it, and what you will not be allowed to know. Truth, honesty, and integrity have now become forbidden because your mind belongs to them.  Most journalists no longer practice the crafts of their professional. The controlling stockholders and CEOs, the dark forces underground, manipulate journalists and commentators that have become intellectual whores who sold their talents to meet the needs of a handful of billionaires in control mainstream media.  Rachel Maddow, award-winning MSNBC nightly news television host, currently campaigns for signatures on a petition, and requests donations to the Committee to Stop Republicans that want Donald Trump imprisoned for his crimes. The Democrats in Congress, led by Rep. Mike Doyle, are pushing for Facebook, Google, and Twitter to increase their censorship. They need Trump gone, and conservatives permanently silenced. Democratic leaders in Congress formally launched a war against the majority of the middle class when they submitted a 28-page document to the Biden-Harris Administration demanding a crackdown of Conservative Christians. It included the removal of all Christians from public office and the re-education of Trump voters. At the Democratic National Convention, they omitted “God” from the pledge of allegiance. Christianity, as they see it, must be abolished. Black Lives Matter leader, Shaun King, called for the destruction of churches and all artwork of Jesus, and he shouted, “They are the symbol of ‘White Supremacy’.” Catholic Churches have been burnt, many have been vandalized across the country, and church services disrupted by leftist mobs. The mayor of Huston, TX, launched a campaign against Christians and issued subpoenas to every Catholic priest demanding copies of their sermons. In a United States Marine manual, the military has classified Catholics and Evangelical Christians as religious extremists along with the KKK, Al-Qaeda, and Hamas who use or advocate violence to accomplish their objectives. They are in good company. The Department of Defense included veterans of the Armed Forces because of their involvement in the January 6 Insurrection. The Democratic Party’s war on Christians has been suppressed by the Deep State Media. Why? How many Christians would vote for a Democratic candidate if they knew this, and how many White voters would advocate for Black Lives Matter by putting signs in their yard? Surprised that the media has ignored the Uyghur Holocaust in China? Thousands of Chines Islamic followers were rounded up and stuffed into 280 concentration camps. Why? The Koran contains the Old Testament, identical to Jews and Christians. Once you dehumanize the enemy, it makes it easier to kill them. It happened in Nazi Germany, and now in China. While these people suffer in labor camps and are subjected to beatings and rape, our media has turned its back, it does not want to disrupt the purchase of Chinese products in American stores. In other words, the mainstream media no longer reports the truth.  They establish the narrative and what you are allowed to read and discuss. If you are outside the box, you are a heretic and can be punished for your point of view or opinion on the matter.  The fate of our country depends on the ability to discuss. If we are going to be part of a world that rules, then we must have freedom of speech to work things out. Freedom of the mind allows us to search for the truth, provides openness to the soul, gives us the ability to rationalize, and talk about it.  While America sleeps, the marginalists are educating your children, gaslighting them to despise themselves and renounce their oppressive identity. They are transforming White culture by altering society’s images in movies, commercials, sitcoms, advertisements, everywhere. They are the heroes; the Whites are the oppressors. Either the Constitution survives, or tyranny prevails.  This struggle has already become violent. Kamala Harris praised the riots, arsons, and looting. “They are essential for the evolution of our country,” she said. The marginals have proven they are ready for a full-scale oppressive war. Sleeping Americans need to awaken. Tyranny is when you are dehumanized and control of your thinking process has been taken away. Numbers determine power. Today we are losing, tomorrow we can defeat the Democratic Party Left. We fought to free the slaves, won civil rights, and almost every one of our laws protects us from discrimination. Every ethnic group and religion has been elected to local, state, and federal governments as members of both political parties. They intermarry and live in a vast number of neighborhoods in every state. They establish deep friendships and working relationships. We call this group the melting pot. Asiatic, Blacks, and Whites who espouse the values of faith, family, and freedom, elements that made America the greatest nation on earth, must join hands and stand up against communism if we want to live in a free country. Those are the stakes. Together as a nation of one people, we can chart a course of optimism and hope.  How this country ends up will be decided by the decision to unite. We have at hand, non-violent alternatives that will defeat the Democratic Party Leftist.  Christian Democrats in Congress like Rep. Emanual Cleaver, the Pastor of a Methodist Church in Kansas City, Mo, need to wake up and take a stand against communists who oppose religion. They need to take the lead in opposition against the Chinese holocaust of Islamic and Christian faith. Americans who support freedom have the ability to boycott Chinese products and any company that relies on Chinese factories for profit.  We must abandon institutions that practice censorship and support freedom of speech, like Facebook and Twitter, and withdraw from colleges and school districts that seek to cancel culture.

Biden’s Plan to Fleece the Nationand Call It ‘Infrastructure’He boasts that it will be “the momentthat America won the future.”

\ By: NATE JACKSON

The Patriot Post 

 April 1, 2021

The nation is quickly approaching $30 trillion in debt. The government has spent something in the order of $10 trillion over the last 18 months, including $2 trillion less than a month ago. So what’s the Democrat plan? Spending another $2 trillion on “infrastructure” — the first of two big proposals totaling $4 trillion — and slapping a bunch of taxes on all Americans to “pay for it.”
“No one making under $400,000 will see their federal taxes go up. Period,” President Joe Biden lied on Wednesday. “This is not about penalizing anyone.”
About that… Biden’s so-called “American Jobs Plan” features massive tax hikes that are the biggest since Bill Clinton in 1993. He disguises this, of course, as merely rolling back some of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts for the “wealthy” and big corporations, but the reality is small business owners are going to be clobbered, as will all consumers. Businesses don’t pay taxes; people who buy their more expensive products do.
That means you.
As the Wall Street Journal editorial board aptly puts it, “Mr. Biden’s corporate tax increases will hit the middle class hard — in the value of their 401(k)s, the size of their pay packets, and what they pay for goods and services. This damage won’t show up immediately, especially as the economy booms as Covid eases this year, but the corrosive impact will compound in the coming years.”
Biden aims to fleece corporations for $1.5 trillion over 10 years by raising the corporate income tax rate to 28% from 21%. But he doesn’t account for just how much the 2017 Republican tax cuts fueled economic growth and how much jacking up taxes will hurt that growth, thus reducing the tax revenue he says it will bring in. On the contrary, Biden and his party insist that government is the primary driver of economic growth.
And Biden’s solution for pushing the U.S. back toward the world’s highest corporate tax rate? Get other countries to hurt themselves by agreeing to a global minimum.
Unity?
Speaking of unity, the American people are generally in favor of fixing roads and bridges so that we have a smoother driving experience. So, despite the cost, $2.25 trillion for infrastructure should make everyone happy in the end, right? Well, the total amount spent on actual roads and bridges is a mere $115 billion — just 5% of the total. Outside of a few billion for airports and waterways, the rest is more of the same old leftist agenda: Bailout unions and subsidize green energy.
Mass transit will get $85 billion, and Amtrak gets another $80 billion — even despite $70 billion for these things just last month. Another $174 billion goes to subsidize electric cars, which, ironically, means more drivers won’t pay the very gas tax that’s supposed to fund infrastructure. Still, another $100 billion goes to retrofitting schools (again, after massive education spending in the NOT COVID Relief bill), and $213 billion pays for “affordable” housing. And on and on it goes.
Yet, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said what many Democrats are thinking: “This is not nearly enough.” It never is.
“President Trump talked about draining the swamp,” said former White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow. 
By the way, this may be called the “American Jobs Act,” but that’s quite a stretch. As the GOP’s rebuttal noted, “A National Bureau of Economic Research study found that for every $1 million spent on green jobs as part of the 2009 Obama-Biden stimulus, only 15 jobs were created.” Biden killed a few hundred times that many jobs with his Keystone Pipeline edict.
Trump hammered Biden’s plan as well: “Joe Biden’s radical plan to implement the largest tax hike in American history is a massive giveaway to China, and many other countries, that will send thousands of factories, millions of jobs, and trillions of dollars to these competitive nations. The Biden plan will crush American workers and decimate U.S. manufacturing while giving special tax privileges to outsourcers, foreign and giant multinational corporations.”
Still, Biden promises bipartisanship. “I’m going to bring Republicans into the Oval Office, listen to them, what they have to say, and be open to other ideas. We’ll have a good-faith negotiation.” But we all know where that will lead — the same place it did with “COVID relief,” which was to totally ignore and outvote Republicans. After all, Biden says, “We have to get it done.”
And hey, Unity™!

 

18 Year-Old Wakes Up as Doctors Prepare to Harvest His Organs

British teen Lewis Roberts narrowly escaped death twice this spring.

The first time occurred on March 13 when Roberts was hit by a van, The Sun reports. Then, the second happened four days later when, after doctors declared him brain dead and his family agreed to donate his organs, the teenager began to breathe on his own, according to the report.

“A miracle any family could wish for after being told he had zero chance of pulling through,” his family said in a statement.

Roberts, 18, of Staffordshire, suffered brain damage when he was hit by a van in Leek, England, on March 13. His family said the teen immediately was flown to the Royal Stoke University Hospital for treatment.

Not long afterward, the family said doctors gave the 18-year-old “zero chance” of survival. The doctors officially certified him as dead and reported his death to the coroner, his sister, Jade Roberts, 28, said.

Jade Roberts said the family agreed to donate his organs to help other patients in need, but they also continued to hope for a miracle.

“We were waiting for a brown line to show for many days, to show he had taken a breath for himself but we had nothing,” she remembered.

Then at midnight, just hours before the organ operation was scheduled, Jade Roberts said she saw her brother breathe and recorded it on video.

Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.

“Midnight, when I said, ‘1-2-3 breath, Lewis,’ a brown line showed,” she said. “The middle line of the video shows the brown line which is Lewis taking a breath for himself.”

His sister told the doctors, but they did not believe her at first, according to the report.

“We were told no, it must be an error, impossible,” she remembered. “Got back home to a phone call … ‘Lewis is breathing now.’”

Since then, Jade Roberts said her brother has shown even more signs of improvement, and she believes his life is a “miracle.”

“He has started to react to pain tests, moving his limbs on his own, and also moving his head from side to side, blinking and also moving his mouth,” his family said in a statement. “Every day, this boy is getting stronger.”

Radical New Rules forPost-AmericaAmericans privately fear these rules, while publicly appearing to accept them.

By: Victor Davis Hanson

March 31, 2021(emphasis added)

Hat Tip: Rip McIntosh

There are 10 new ideas that are changing America, maybe permanently.  
1) Money is a construct. It can be created from thin air. Annual deficits and aggregate national debt no longer matter much. 
Prior presidents ran up huge annual deficits. But at least there were some concessions that the money was real and had to be paid back. Not now. As we near $30 trillion in national debt and 110 percent of annual GDP, our elites either believe permanent zero interest rates make the cascading obligation irrelevant or the larger the debt, the more likely we will be forced to address needed income redistribution. 
2) Laws are not necessarily binding anymore. Joe Biden took an oath to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” But he has willfully rendered federal immigration laws null and void. Some rioters are prosecuted for violating federal laws, others not so much. Arrests, prosecutions, and trials are all fluid. Ideology governs when a law is still considered a law. 
Crime rates do not necessarily matter. If someone is carjacked, assaulted, or shot, it can be understood to be as much his fault as the perpetrator’s. Either the victim was too lax, uncaring, and insensitive, or he provoked his attacker. How useful the crime is to the larger agendas of the Left determines whether a victim is really a victim, and the victimizer really a victimized. 
3) Racialism is now acceptable. We are defined first by our particular ethnic or religious tribe, only secondarily—if at all—by an American commonality. The unapologetic and explicit exclusion of whites from dorms, graduations, safe spaces, welfare, and federal aid programs is now noncontroversial. It is unspoken payback for perceived past sins, or a type of “good” racism. Falsely being called a racist makes one more guilty than falsely calling someone else a racist. 
4) The immigrant is mostly preferable to the citizen. The newcomer, unlike the host, is not stained by the sins of America’s founding and history. Most citizens currently must follow quarantine rules, social distancing, stay out of school, and obey all the laws. Yet those entering the United States en masse and illegally need not follow such apparently superfluous COVID-19 rules. Their children should be immediately schooled without worry of quarantine. Immigrants need not worry about their illegal entry or residence in America. Our elites believe illegal entrants more resemble the “founders” than do legal citizens, about half of whom they consider irredeemable.
5) Most Americans should be treated as we would treat little children. They cannot be asked to provide an ID to vote. “Noble lies” by our elites about COVID-19 rules are necessary to protect “Neanderthals” from themselves. 
Americans deserve relief from the stress of grades, standardized testing, and normative rules of school behavior. They still are clueless about why it is good for them to pay far more for their gasoline, heating, and air conditioning. 
6) Hypocrisy is passé. Virtue-signaling is alive. Climate change activists fly on private jets. Social justice warriors live in gated communities. Multibillionaire elitists pose as victims of sexism, racism, and homophobia. The elite need these exemptions to help the helpless. It is what you say to lesser others about how to live, not how you yourself live, that matters. 
7) Ignoring or perpetuating homelessness is preferable to ending it. It is more humane for both the homeless and the public that thousands live, eat, defecate, and use drugs on public streets and sidewalks than it is to green-light affordable housing, mandate hospitalization for the mentally ill, and create sufficient public shelter areas. 
8) McCarthyism is good. Destroying lives and careers for incorrect thoughts saves more lives and careers. Cancel culture and the Twitter Reign of Terror provide needed deterrence. 
Now that Americans know they are one wrong word, act, or look away from losing their jobs or livelihoods, they are more careful and will behave in a more enlightened fashion. The social media guillotine is the humane, scientific tool of the woke. 
9) Ignorance is preferable to knowledge. Neither statue-toppling, name-changing, nor the “1619 Project” require any evidence or historical knowledge. Heroes of the past were simple constructs. Undergraduate, graduate and professional degrees reflect credentials, not knowledge. The brand, not what created it, is all that matters. 
10) Wokeness is the new religion, growing faster and larger than Christianity itself. Its priesthood outnumbers the clergy, and exercises far more power. Silicon Valley is the new Vatican, and Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Twitter the new Gospels.
Americans privately fear these rules, while publicly appearing to accept them.
They still could be transitory and invite a reaction. Or they are already near-permanent and institutionalized.
The answer determines whether a constitutional republic continues as once envisioned, or warps into something never imagined by those who created it.

Biden And The Bishops At Easter April 1, 2021 Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on the relationship of President Biden and the U.S. bishops at Easter: During the presidential campaign season last year, it was obvious that candidate Joe Biden was not having an easy time with some U.S. bishops. After he won the election, that observation was validated. Now that we are at Easter, it is undeniably true that the president’s relationship with many bishops is rocky, if not seriously strained. Last summer, Providence Bishop Thomas J. Tobin issued a tweet that was both sarcastic and pointed. “Biden-Harris. First time in awhile that the Democratic ticket hasn’t had a Catholic on it. Sad.” The dismissal of Biden’s professed Catholic status was lost on no one. A month before the election, Cardinal Raymond Burke said that Biden should not receive Communion, adding that he was not a Catholic “in good standing.” A few weeks after the election, Archbishop José Gomez, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, opined that President-elect Biden supported policies that “attack some fundamental values we hold dear.” Noting that it could be confusing to Catholics to see a Catholic in the White House who rejected the Church’s teachings on abortion and other matters, Gomez appointed a Working Group, chaired by Detroit Archbishop Allen Vigneron, to help the bishops “navigate” this “difficult and complex situation.” In December, the recently retired archbishop of Philadelphia, Charles Chaput, said that Biden’s support for gay marriage and abortion rights meant that he “should stop defining himself as a devout Catholic.” On the day he was inaugurated, Biden’s press secretary, Jen Psaki, called the president a “devout Catholic.” Archbishop Gomez, speaking for the bishops’ conference, also weighed in on inauguration day. “I must point out that the new President has pledged to pursue certain policies that would advance moral evils and threaten human life and dignity, most seriously in the areas of abortion, contraception, marriage, and gender. Of deep concern is the liberty of the Church and the freedom of believers to live according to their consciences.” A week later, Archbishop Joseph Naumann, chairman of the bishops’ Pro-Life Committee, teamed up with Bishop David Malloy, the head of the bishops’ International Justice and Peace Committee, to take Biden to task for promoting abortion overseas. “It is grievous that one of President Biden’s first official acts actively promotes the destruction of human lives in developing nations.” They said his executive order “is antithetical to reason, violates human dignity, and is incompatible with Catholic teaching.” In February, Naumann, the archbishop of Kansas City, Kansas, said that Biden “should stop defining himself as a devout Catholic,” noting that he is “100% pro-choice on abortion.” He accused Biden of “usurping the role of the bishops and confusing people.” What should be done? “The bishops need to correct him, as the president is acting contrary to the Catholic faith.” Within days of Naumann’s remarks, Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas declared that “Biden is not a real Catholic.” In March, Bishop Richard Stika, who heads the Diocese of Knoxville, tweeted that Biden “likes to brag on his Catholic background when convenient. So very dishonest!” At the end of March, Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki, who leads the Diocese of Springfield, Illinois, said that Biden “should not present himself” for Communion. He cited Biden’s long history of supporting abortion rights, saying that if politicians are “living in a way or holding positions that are contrary to church teaching, then the Minister of Communion has to deny them the sacrament.” Paprocki’s comments were followed by Cardinal Burke’s. Speaking of Biden, he said that “a person who claims to be Catholic and yet promotes in such an open, obdurate, and aggressive way a crime like procured abortion is in the state, at least, of apostasy.” He concluded that the penalty for the “crime of apostasy” is “excommunication.” As we approach Easter, the bishops, as well as millions of practicing Catholics, are not going to have their concerns about Biden allayed by photos of him clinging to his rosary beads. He cannot at once declare himself to be a “devout Catholic” while at the same time supporting abortion-on-demand, gay marriage, sex transitioning for minors, and the war on religious liberty. It’s time for President Biden to stop living a lie.

• About Us

Exclusive: Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’ 

March 25, 2021 | Comments Offon Exclusive: Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’

by Mordechai Sones

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the worlds population.

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else.
Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

AFLDS: The Israel Supreme Court decision last week cancelling COVID flight restrictions said: “In the future, any new restrictions on travel into or out of Israel need, in legal terms, a comprehensive, factual, data-based foundation.”

In a talk you gave four months ago, you said

“The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.

“The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; it’s cross immunity.

“So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.”

In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

Yeadon: “What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2.
The study is from one of the best labs in their field.

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not “high throughput” and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K.

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune.

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus.

For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death. So how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated.

Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die.

Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who haven’t already had COVID-19? 

Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case? 

And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity”, would that then not protect from any super-variant?

“I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.

“As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous.

“No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.

“It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to “escape immunity”.

“Not only is it intrinsically unlikely – because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant – but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research.

“The research I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants.

“This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant.

“I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE. I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural experiments’, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines.

“The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right).

“The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.”

Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection?

“Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA.
Always good quality interactions.

“Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.

“So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest.

“The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine.

“You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmich’s “Corona Committee” online.

“So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless.

“Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us.

“Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots.

“I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator.

“I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us.

“PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.

“As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes.

“For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the worlds population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.

“It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”Posted in Frontline News and tagged COVID-19, depopulation, FDA, hydroxychloroquine, immunity, Ivermectin, Mike Yeadon, SARS, SARS CoV-2, vaccine injury