FW: New from Age of Autism

New from Age of Autism

---

• AstraZeneca Vaccine On Hold After Serious Adverse Reaction
• Transhumanism In The Era of Covid

AstraZeneca Vaccine On Hold After Serious Adverse ReactionPosted: 09 Sep 2020 03:01 AM PDTNote: We hope the clinical trial participant will recover. There’s no joy in vaccine injury. Ever. We speak and write glibly about “the vaccine,” sometimes overlooking that real people, men and women, are the test subjects. Here is the Clinical Trials News Release from NIH on the Phase III trial. From DailyMail UK Oxford and AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine trial is put on HOLD for safety reasons after a British volunteer had a ‘serious’ reaction that could have been caused by injectionPhase 3 trials for the coronavirus vaccine being developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca have been placed on a hold after a ‘serious adverse event’ was reported in a participant in the UK. Serious adverse events are suspected reactions to vaccines or drugs that require hospitalization, are life-threateningly or deadly. It’s unclear what the exact nature of the reaction was, but a person familiar with the matter told Stat News that the person is expected to recover.  New York Post AstraZeneca halts COVID-19 vaccine trial after possible serious side effect (Note: In large trials illnesses will happen by chance…. Is THAT what AZ wants us to believe?)“This is a routine action which has to happen whenever there is a potentially unexplained illness in one of the trials, while it is investigated, ensuring we maintain the integrity of the trials,” AstraZeneca said in a statement.“In large trials, illnesses will happen by chance but must be independently reviewed to check this carefully.”

Transhumanism In The Era of CovidPosted: 09 Sep 2020 03:00 AM PDTNote:  Anne Dachel transcribed a YouTube video below. The channel is controversial. The information? We’ll let you decide.  The COVID vaccines are racing down the pike. ###Dr. Carrie Madej speaks out about COVlD-19 vaccine(Dr. Carrie Madej, DO is an Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA and has over 19 years of experience in the medical field. She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001. She is affiliated with Southern Regional Medical Center.)Dr. Carrie Madej, Forest Park, GA So what do you think about going from Human 1.0 to Human 2.0? And what does that mean? Well going from humans as we now know ourselves to Human 2.0 has something to do with transhumanism. If you’re not familiar with that term, it’s about taking humans as we know ourselves and melding with artificial intelligence, kind of like being in The Matrix, if you’ve ever seen that movie. And that may seem kind of cool to you. We might have some  superhuman abilities. Maybe be able to think of something and it happens, maybe have some physical abilities that would be almost superhuman like. That’s the idea, that’s what you see in sci-fi movies.For myself, thinking about this topic, I’m like well, I have some time, I think that’s many years in the future. However, this question, this idea is now right in this moment. We need to make a decision. I found out we need to make a decision about this because I investigated the proposed COVID 19 vaccine, and this is my alarm call to the world. I looked at the pros and cons and it frightens me. I want you to know about this. You need to be very well informed because this new vaccine is not like your normal flu vaccine. This is something very different. This is something brand new. This is completely experimental on the human race.It’s not just about being a different vaccine. There are technologies that are being introduced with this vaccine that can change the way we live, who we are and what we are and very quickly. Some people, that you might know these names: Elon Musk, who is the founder of SpaceX and Tesla automotive, as well as Ray Kurzweil, who is one of the big wigs of Google. These are self-proclaimed transhumanists. They believe that we should go to Human 2.0, and they are very big proponents of this. There [are] a lot of other people. You might know their names. They’re also involved with this, so you should look that up.I think the easiest way to explain this to you is to go with one of the front runners for the vaccine and go into a little bit of the history and tell you how they want to make the vaccine. I think that will speak volumes. For instance Moderna is one of the front runners for the COVID 19 vaccine. You should know that Moderna was founded by a person from Harvard, Derek Rossi, and this researcher actually was successful in taking some modified RNA and be able to reprogram a stem cell in the body and change the function of the stem cell. He actually made it genetically modified. He proved that you can genetically modify something by using modified RNA. So they founded the company Moderna on this concept. It’s kind of a new kid on the block, okay? It’s not been around that long. In fact, [Moderna] hasn’t made any vaccine for a human before. It’s made no medicine for a human before. This will be their first run. You must know that Moderna was in the news recently because it really fast tracked—like the other companies, it’s fast tracking the vaccine. It’s going from phase one to phase two very, very quickly. In fact, it’s going from phase one to phase three in its experiments from March of this year until currently. That is unbelievable. It usually takes five or six years. How are they able to do this with the safety and efficacy data that we need? I want you to know that in phase two…they’re only using between 35 and 40 humans. In Moderna’s test study they only used 45 humans, and with the high dose vaccine group,…100 percent of those people got systemic side effects. One hundred. That’s only in the short side effect profile. In the low dose vaccine [group] 80 percent got systemic side effects. We don’t even know the long side effects from that. We would need a lot longer time, right? Maybe years. But we do know, based on previous animal studies using this technology, you can expect possibly increased cancer rates, increased mutant genes, mutagenesis, also increased autoimmune reactions. For instance, in some of the ferret studies, they saw that when the ferret was introduced to the virus that they were trying to protect the ferret from, after the ferret got the vaccine, they actually had an exaggerated immune response. It actually hurt the ferret. They had more lung inflammation, more lung fluid, even some problems with their liver. It actually hurt them. They had a poorer response. Those are longer term reactions and that could be seen with this vaccine, but we don’t know the data yet. So it’s not without risk. How are they doing this?They’re actually suggesting to use a platform. Let me just explain how they would administer the vaccine. There’s an idea called microneedle platform. This was developed by MIT. They said it could be very easily produced, mass produced. This is why they’re proposing this technology and many millions of vaccines could be made quickly. They could also be administered by yourself. The idea is to get a Band-Aid, it looks like a Band-Aid you buy in the drug store. It’s shipped to you through Amazon or UPS or some other shipping service. You take it out of the package, you put it on your hand like this, and then you take the sticker off and voila, you’ve been vaccinated. How is that possible?In this Band-Aid it has little tiny spicules, little tiny needles. This was designed after a snake viper fang bite… So little snakebites. In these little tiny spicules, they claim you [won’t] feel it that much, there are little hydrogel. It’s a material called hydrogel. Inside the hydrogel would be a luciferase enzyme as well as the vaccine itself. So what is all that?First of all, you’re getting the vaccine. It’s modified RNA or modified DNA.  Let’s take Moderna, modified RNA. In that modified RNA the idea is that the microneedles would puncture into your cell membrane and this synthetic piece of an RNA, it’s a code for the part of the virus, or they could use a synthetic DNA to code for the part of the virus that would go into your[cell] nucleus. Your body would start transcribing it, it would start reading it and making more of that part of the virus. Why would we want to make more of the virus or part of the virus?The idea is your body would get used to seeing it, would know how to make antibodies and would have an improved T cell response. The idea is then when you saw it in the future, your body would already know how to fight it and it would be a better response. That’s the idea. The problem with that is they’re using something, a process called transfection. Transfection is a way that we make genetically modified organisms. I think you know about those fruits and vegetables. They’re not as healthy as the normal, wild type of fruit and vegetable. So possibly you could extrapolate that to a human. If we became genetically modified we would not be as healthy. We don’t have long term studies on this anyway. It’s unbelievable.  The vaccine manufacturers have made the statement this will not alter our DNA, our genome. I say that is not true. Because if we use this process to make a genetically modified organism, why would it not do the same thing to a human? I don’t know why they’re saying that. If you look at the definition of transfection it’ll tell you that it can be a temporary change in the cell. I think that’s what the vaccine manufacturers are banking on. It’s temporary. Or it’s a possibility for it to become stable, to be taken up into the genome. So stable that it will start replicating when the genome replicates, meaning it is now a permanent part of your genome. That’s the chance that we’re taking. So it could be temporary or it could be permanent. We would never know that for years down the road honestly.So here we go. We’ve got something that can alter our genome. It’s a possibility. And another thing on that, if they’re altering the genome, what would be the effects? I told you previously some of the side effects, but also we need to know that this is a synthetic piece of DNA or RNA, and if it [is] taken up into the genome of a human, it’s synthetic, it’s not from nature. If you look at the Supreme Court ruling on synthetic DNA or genes, it can be patented, and patents have owners. So what does that mean for us? What if this gets into our genome? Does that mean that Moderna or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation or the Department of Defense, all of these people who are involved in the patents are they somehow going to own parts of our genome?It’s a possibility. You need to know that. That’s one part of this delivery system, just one. Now let me go to the next. The next part of the delivery system is a luciferase enzyme. They named it, they patented it luciferase. I don’t like that name. Luciferase because it has bioluminescent qualities which means it can produce a light, or has a light source. All of this would be under your skin and you cannot see it. The luciferase is an idea because they want to make sure that you’re vaccinated because they don’t trust medical records, they don’t trust you saying that you got vaccinated. They want to make sure, and they want to make sure that it was successful, a successful transfection, a successful gene modification. So when you get the luciferase enzyme, if you have an iPhone or a special app on the iPhone, you can scan over that area and it will give a digital code, a digital imprint, a digital pattern, something that will identify that you were vaccinated. It holds your vaccination record. It also gives you an ID, a number, a bar code, a branding, whatever you want to call it, a tattoo. It’s all the same thing. You now become like a product. So we have that. The third thing I mentioned was hydrogel. Hydrogel is actually an invention from DARPA, the Department of Advanced Research Projects Agency. This is kind of a sci fi kind of a group from the Department of Defense, Pentagon, of the U.S. government. They make these fantastic inventions. So one of them is hydrogel. Hydrogel, you can look on You Tube. Profusa is one of the companies, DARPA as well as hydrogel and you’ll find some little two minute clips that they describe. So hydrogel is nanotechnology, microscopic little robots, and these little robots actually, I know it sounds crazy, it’s still crazy to me, but it’s possible, okay? They can disassemble, reassemble, assemble into and make different things. With this hydrogel, it’s really nanotechnology, so that’s something robotic or something that’s artificial intelligence. It has the ability to connect with artificial intelligence. This means that a human can now connect to directly and gather information from our bodies and connect with your smartphone, with the cloud, with some other smart device. Once this is done, this is 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. Think about that. Think about how immediately that could change our privacy. Immediately it could change our autonomy, immediately change our freedoms. This can gather data like your blood sugar, your oxygen, your blood pressure. Okay, those sound great. But it also can gather many other things. It can gather, they say, your emotions or your menstrual cycle, your activity, if  you’ve  fallen, your nutrients in your body, if you took medicines. It’s a potential to see if you took illicit drugs. It’s got a potential to see almost anything that goes on in your body. And all of this information is going where? That has not been addressed. Who’s protecting this information? What are they using it for? This is really serious stuff, guys. This is all being proposed to being unveiled in the next vaccine. The other thing to know is with this nanotechnology hydrogel, artificial intelligence hookup, just like your cell phone, you can send a text message, you can send an email, but also you can  receive them back. So that means we could receive information.What information would be coming back into us? Would it affect our mood, our behavior? Would it affect how we think, our memories? If you haven’t watched the movie Matrix, I think you should. I think there’s some truths in that, in that movie. I see so many wrong things with this vaccine, and I see that we are not talking about it in the major media. I feel that these companies are outright lying to us when they say they cannot affect our DNA because by all definitions that they are using this can affect our DNA. I want to make this video short because I wanted to get the point across, I wanted you to really do your own research. So know that there are many risks that we’re seeing here.We really need to know if we really want to go from Human 1.0 to Human 2.0.Let me also tell you that there’s some major names behind these vaccines. You’re always going to see like the Department of Defense from the U.S. government, sometimes DARPA, like I told you. Why is the military involved with our vaccines? You see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation everywhere with this. If you look, you’ll find that name almost always. Let’s go back to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Let’s look at the track record. Let’s look at what that man stands for. His family comes from a family of eugenics. What does eugenics mean? Population control, meaning there are too many people on the planet. That’s important to know. He’s been on video stating that he thinks with a very good new vaccine we could get the earth’s population to be decreased by 10 to 15 percent. Well, who’s going to stay and who’s going to go? And who is he to decide? He doesn’t have a medical background, no epidemiology background, no science background. He’s not a doctor. Software tech. That’s what he has. I’d also like you to realize, I always look at who has a vested interest. What are their motivations? What is his motivation, right? We already know his family background. What’s very concerning to me is that DARPA, this military agency, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is very interested in something called “Gene Drive” research or technology, or “Gene Extinction” technology. It’s exactly what it sounds like. By using genetic mutations, by use of transfection for instance, you can exterminate an entire species from the planet. They are proposing to use this for mosquitoes, for instance, in Africa. But our world is a delicate ecosystem. Who is saying one species goes? You destroy one species and you could affect an entire ecosystem. So when you exterminate an entire species, you will affect an entire ecosystem. It’s a very delicate balance. Who’s to say who’s going to stay and who’s going to go? Who’s got that knowledge and why aren’t we talking about this? And if we can do it to an insect, we can do it to an animal, we can do it to a human.  I bring this up because if these agencies that are behind the vaccine also stand for that, do you trust them with your health? Do you trust them with your family? Do you trust them with our children? The other thing is we’re rushing this to production. What is the motivation behind that? We need to really think about this. I’ve also stated in the past that we need to know, at least in the United States, there are mandates passed that make the vaccine manufacturers have no liability, zero liability for any harm done to any human. If people are killed, if they’re hurt, if they’re paralyzed, if they’re maimed for life, it doesn’t matter. You have no recourse, and they still make all their profit. So there is no incentive for them to make it safe anyway.I also want you to know [about] one of the mandates in the Emergency Preparedness Act that says they can force a vaccine on us. They cannot force a vaccine if there is a viable treatment for the COVID 19. I want you to know that doctors around the world are being censored about treatment options for COVID 19 or prevention for COVID 19. If there’s a true treatment or prevention then they can’t force this vaccine on us. I want to bring that up because what in the world is the motivation of doing this? Is it really [for] the health of all of us? As a doctor, I can’t see how this is in the true health of the entire world. I think there is another motive, another agenda going on. The more I look at this, the more that comes up….Do you really want to go to Human 2.0? I don’t think it’s the fantasy you see in the movies. We need to come together and we need to unify our voices because people in positions of power taking care of our health are not in our best interest. Together we have power. Together, united, our voice is strong. So I encourage you to do critical thinking, do your own research, join groups in your state, go to your state legislature and you tell them no, no to these experiments on humans, no to invasion of privacy, no to censorship.We are sovereign human souls. We need to take our rights back. …Thank you.  Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.

One year ago today, this was posted on a reliable website. A lot has happened in a year. A lot more will happen in short order regarding changes in the Mass and the one world false church Bergoglio is trying to create. 

What next?  We shall soon see.  Here is a message you might find interesting, in light of the new Roman Missal just published in Italian (photo at bottom).  See message below, from March 11, 2014 from our Mother or Salvation:

Mother of Salvation: They will present a new red book, with the head of a goat embedded within its cover

2014-03-11 20:39

My dear child, when I gave birth to my Son, this meant that I not only delivered the Son of man, the Saviour of the world, but also brought about a new beginning. The world was redeemed by the birth of my precious Son and mankind was given a very special Gift. This Gift was rejected, but humanity still benefits today, because so many have accepted the Truth.

The birth of my Son heralded the birth of His Church on Earth, as both were borne of me, a mere handmaid of the Lord. It will be me, the woman clothed with the sun, who will be banished by the serpent, along with my Son’s Church, into the desert. Every trace of me, the Mother of God, will be wiped out. Apparitions, which are attributed to me, will be ridiculed and people will be instructed, by the enemies in my Son’s Church, to reject all credence associated with them. Then, my Son’s Church will be discarded, along with those who are true followers of Christ. The Holy Masses will cease and while all of this is going on, the serpent will scatter his servants and they will claim their seats in every Christian church. Such will be the magnitude of this takeover that many people, true believers, will be so astonished that they will be too frightened to stand up and object to the desecration they will have to witness, for fear of their lives.

During this time, my Son’s Remnant will gather in every nation, the world over, and lead the lost and the bewildered, during this terrible period of infestation. This Army will be given great power over evil, which will be witnessed in what once were the Churches of my Son. They will, by the Power of the Holy Spirit, preach the Truth – the True Gospels – the True Word, given to the world in the Holy Bible. The Bible will be challenged openly, by imposters in Christian churches and they will question every Teaching, which warns of the danger of sin. They will twist its contents and they will present a new red book with the head of a goat embedded within its cover, hidden inside the symbol of the cross.

To the outside world of unbelievers, this will appear to be a revolution and one, which will fascinate them and appeal to those who reject the Existence of God. Great celebrations will begin in many nations. They will welcome the celebration of freedom, from all moral obligations, in the name of global unity and a celebration of human rights.

The Light of my Son’s Presence will be held high, like a beacon, by those who will lead my Son’s Remnant Army. This Light will continue to draw souls, everywhere, despite the spread of paganism across all churches, of every creed, with the exception of the two witnesses – the Christians and the Jews, who remain true to God’s Will.

Then, when the Great Day dawns and after the three terrible days of darkness are over, a great Light will appear over the Earth. This Light will surround my Son and the sun, which will be at its greatest strength, will descend over the world – both at the same time. Not one person will fail to witness this supernatural spectacle. The roar of the announcement will be heard by all through every form of communication known to man. Therefore, all will anticipate a great event, but they will not know the time, the hour or the date. And then those, whose names are listed in the Book of the Living, will be gathered.

Pray, pray, pray that the world will not reject the preparation, which is needed before humanity can see the Light of my Son’s Face.

Your beloved Mother

Mother of Salvation

THE MOST IMPORTANT PRE-ELECTION STORY YOU WILL READ By Mike Huckabee September 8, 2020  “The urge to save humanity is almost always a false face for the urge to rule it.” H. L. Mencken About a week ago, I wrote to warn about what Democrats plan to do to go around the will of the voters should Trump win, even if his win is decisive.  VOTE IN PERSON, I said, to make as sure as you possibly can that your vote will count, and be ready for anything after the votes start coming in. That’s especially true if your state is considered to be, even possibly, a “swing” state. Democrats aren’t even bothering to be secretive about their plans; Madame Defarge herself (Hillary) says that UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES should Biden concede. And the WASHINGTON POST ran an op-ed saying that only if Biden won in a landslide would there be no rioting and looting afterwards. It was like saying, “Vote for us, the looters and rioters, so your life won’t be destroyed by looting and rioting.” Since I brought you that story, the threat has been clarified even more. What the left is trying to do right now is straight out of a George Orwell novel. Recall that in “1984,” the “Ministry of Truth” is actually in charge of just the opposite: maintaining a fiction. Over the summer, Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) began laying the groundwork by suggesting Trump wouldn’t go quietly if he lost. Why, the military might have to save us from him. Pieces like Zachary Cohen’s for CNN first tried to cast doubt on Trump’s fitness for office, asking “Can military commanders refuse an order from Trump?” Cohen reassured his frightened readers that with the “layers of safeguards” we have, the President can’t unilaterally deploy a disproportionate nuclear attack. I’ll provide the link to this ridiculous commentary, but read it only if you’re absolutely sure you can keep your head from exploding. Here’s another completely crazy one, by a couple of retired Army officers wanting to further the scenario of Trump playing “dictator” and refusing to leave the White House if he loses. This is based on nothing other than Trump warning about mail-in ballots and election fraud. (News flash: Trump is absolutely right about mail-in ballots and election fraud. Why do you think Democrats are pushing so hard for mail-in voting? It’s so they can discredit the results if Trump wins, and also to set the stage for chaos.) People actually read this piece of drivel, and I’m sure some took it very seriously. Then there was the WAPO story we talked about last week: John Podesta’s George Soros-funded “war games” seminar at which about 100 Democrat leaders and some anti-Trump Republicans –- so they could use the word “bipartisan” –- looked at all the possible election scenarios. (Here’s the Orwellian part: this was called “the Transition Integrity Project.”) In the scenario of Trump clearly winning, Podesta, playing the role of Biden, refused to concede (just as Hillary has advised), pressured even states won by Trump to send a Democrat slate of electors to the Electoral College, and “trusted the military to take care of the rest.” In other words, vote for Trump and bring on the coup. What would follow a Trump win, they said, would be “a street fight, not a legal battle.” Recall that we GOT a legal battle in the aftermath of the George W. Bush/Al Gore “hanging chad” election, with Democrats using the legal dispute forever after to claim that Bush wasn’t a legitimate President. That mess will look like a picnic in the park compared to 2020 if Trump wins, they’re warning. This time, it’s gonna get rough. And, of course, it will be all Trump’s fault. So the second part of the plan is to make sure we think it IS all Trump’s fault. Why have the Democrats chosen to speak so freely for months about the likely need for an anti-Trump coup? That one’s easy: they’ve got to get the idea of a coup out there –- A COUP CAUSED BY TRUMP –- with the threat that we’ll have “a repeat of this summer, only much, much bigger.” Then, when the time comes, “crank the propaganda to eardrum-shattering decibels and fill the streets of every major city with ‘protesters.’ Shut down the country and allow only one message to be heard: ‘Trump must go.’” And you know the media will do it, blaming Trump for the whole mess. So, how does the Trump administration prepare for a clear electoral win in which Biden won’t concede, when Democrats are already busy twisting the story into the opposite of that? Maybe the Republicans need to play out their own “war game” scenario. In case there is a coup, they also need a clear idea of who is on their side. And the President needs ways to communicate with the American people that can go around most of the major media. (Tweets won’t do it; he’ll be banned, of course.) Trump had better be ready, and we need to be warning about this from now till Election Day. I believe, just as I did in 2016, that Trump will win. It’ll have to be a landslide to overcome the inevitable mail-in ballot fraud, but he will win. I just don’t believe that THAT many Americans have utterly lost their minds. Democrats will insist Biden really won and that any “coup” is Trump’s fault, but it’s a lie they’ve been setting up for months. I’ll leave you with an opinion piece about this that is guaranteed not to make your head explode, by Jonathan Tobin in the NEW YORK POST. But take heed: it is very much a warning. Email Link   https://conta.cc/3bGerDG

Democrats’ new strategy for winning the White House: Threaten riots if they lose By Jonathan S. Tobin September 7, 2020 | 7:27pm | Updated  Enlarge Image AP Photo/Patrick Semansky MORE ON: 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Joe Biden and Kamala Harris need to quit playing politics with COVID-19 vaccine Trump says restaurant rioters ‘will be in charge’ if Joe Biden wins Outspoken Biden critic Padma Lakshmi co-hosts Kamala Harris fundraiser Trump bans oil drilling off coast of Southern states, likens himself to Teddy Roosevelt Four years ago, Hillary Clinton supporters talked a lot about then-candidate ­Donald Trump refusing to concede a presidential election they were certain he would lose. As it happened, they had it ­exactly backward: Trump wound up winning, and Democrats and their media cheerleaders have spent most of their waking moments ever since then trying to invalidate that result. They used false charges about Russian “collusion” and any other conceivable means — fair or foul — to make the bad dream of 2016 go away. That’s the key fact to keep in mind amid the drumbeat of ­obsessive mainstream commentary and analysis about what Trump will do when he loses in November. The drumbeat has been getting louder. In recent weeks, multiple mainstream outlets have ­pondered the same old Trump-sore-loser scenario. They are certain the president will seek to delegitimize the ­results and use unconstitutional means to hold onto an office from which they are sure voters will evict him. As he did in 2016, Trump has cast doubt on the integrity of the process by talking about possible election fraud. Only this time, his concerns have some merit. A recent Post feature related a veteran Democratic operative’s confession about how easy it is to cheat, making it clear there is reason to worry. With so many ballots being mailed this fall ­because of the pandemic — and with so few safeguards put in place — chaos is likely as the count drags on for days, weeks and even months after Election Day. That has led a host of liberal pundits to openly speculate about how to stop Trump from stealing the election. Their formulas for saving democracy from him include having “principled” Republicans undermine Trump from within the government, military intervention a k a a coup and, most importantly, mass protests. They are sure the only way to ensure a peaceful transition of power is a landslide victory for Joe Biden by a margin that not even a real estate developer from Queens could challenge. But there is a problem with their fulminations about the evil orange man installing the ­authoritarian regime liberals have been warning us about ever since he started running for president. To wit: It’s all pure projection on their part. For all of their frightening predictions of what Trump might do if he loses, the one thing we ­already know is that it is the Democrats who will, as Clinton advised Biden, never concede defeat. Though some of Trump’s trolling of the media and the left is interpreted as ­betraying his plans to overturn the results, Democrats have already shown us outright how they react to losing. This time, Democrats won’t be relying on conspiracy theories or politicized investigations. Instead, they are counting on a strategy ­intended to scare Americans into voting for Biden — even if they have misgivings about handing over the government to a confused figurehead and his radical supporters. SEE ALSO Democrats determined to treat November’s election as illegitimate — unless they win After a summer of (ahem) “mostly peaceful” Black Lives Matter protests that unleashed violence and looting in American cities, most recently in Rochester, is there a shred of doubt in anyone’s mind that the same combination of elite liberals, criminal thugs and Antifa Marxists would be deployed to burn and destroy the moment it appears that Trump might be winning? Behind all that high-minded talk from pompous columnists about virtuous patriots stopping Trump from cheating is a brazen threat. They’re saying in effect: The same forces that have wreaked havoc in the name of a false charge that America is an irredeemably racist nation may well inflict even worse damage in order to ensure that Trump’s re-election is thwarted. That’s the subtext of the talk from Biden supporters about democracy. Their ace in the hole isn’t an accurate count of the votes but the certainty that America’s cities will burn ­unless the electorate bows to their demands. Aided by the devastation from the pandemic, Biden may yet win without any help from mobs. If he does, Trump will likely bow to the verdict of the people and go home. But in what is likely to be a close election in a deeply ­divided country — immersed in a culture war about a largely false charge of racism — the real threat to the process isn’t a presidential spoilsport. It’s a Democratic Party that is fully prepared to unleash ruin on the nation if it loses again. Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS.org.

As much as I enjoy Conrad’s writing, I’m tempted to replace the word “Hit” with”Near” in his headline. I’m certain the dems have more up their sleeves.Democrats Hit Rock BottomOn Election Tactics By CONRAD BLACK September 8, 2020 In terms of political ethics and tactics, the Democrats have hit (CLOSE TO) rock bottom. The Atlantic has worked hard to become a third-rate New Yorker in terms both of literary quality and the vitriol of its hatred for President Trump; the magazine has probably confirmed its position with the confection of the uncorroborated and totally implausible allegation that President Trump disparaged American World War I veterans who died in France as “suckers” and “losers.” It is impossible that any such statement was made by him. He is a proud graduate of the New York Military Academy, and while he was happy to invoke a minor bone-chip in his foot as reason enough not to enter the military during the Vietnam era, that does not disqualify him as an admirer and supporter of the U.S. armed forces. He did not think that the Vietnam War was an intelligent commitment of American manpower and resources, a view shared by many Americans including Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. Today that view is indeed the general historical opinion of that war. This president, though, unlike some of his predecessors, believes ardently both in the necessity and the nobility of the U.S. military, and he has done a great deal to strengthen the troops and raise their pay. It is indicative of the fact that the Democrats are much less overconfident than they were four years ago that they have unleashed their dirty tricks division a month earlier than they did in 2016 with the completely irrelevant Billy Bush “Access Hollywood” tape of locker room indiscretions by candidate Trump 11 years before. While it was completely irrelevant to whether Trump was worthy of election in 2016, and was somewhat bizarre as it emanated from the campaign of the spouse of, along with John F. Kennedy, the greatest sexual predator in the history of the White House, it was at least an uncontested recording from many years before of Mr. Trump’s opinion of a celebrity’s opportunities for sexual self-assertion. He did say it. In this latest incident, many people, including almost everyone who would have been present, have all denied that any such utterance had been made. It is inconceivable that this president would think or say anything of the kind. But the odium of the incident is magnified by the fact that it was clearly staged in a tight sequence coordinated between the Biden campaign and its most rabid press partisans. As soon as the Atlantic story appeared, an anti-Trump veterans’ organization called VoteVets produced a lengthy follow-up Internet statement that the President was not really any friend of the Armed Forces and veterans should take note of his outrageous comments in Paris and swarm the polls in favor of his opponent. The inevitable “Morning Joe” Scarborough was already thoroughly up to speed early Friday after the Atlantic “revelation,” and fired a full anti-Trump broadside on his MSNBC program. Shortly after, with obvious careful prearrangement, Joe Biden sortied from his basement like a fretful World War II German battleship commander ever-fearful (for good reason) that enemy heavy units might be about. In response to a planted question from an Atlantic reporter, and with the perfunctory condition of the remarks being true, Mr. Biden delivered a righteous denunciation of the president ending with: “Who does he think he is?” Then he scurried back indoors like the Bismarck, Scharnhorst, or Tirpitz returning at speed to their fjord. It was perhaps the slimiest smear job in American presidential politics since the McCarthy era. At least the Russian collusion fraud was somewhat ingeniously constructed — requiring, as it did, the partial corruption of the intelligence agencies and the FBI to get it into the press as fruit of a spurious counterintelligence investigation and therefore the infamous Steele dossier pastiche of lies and deformations. That required no journalistic verification. Evil as it was — as presumably even the lethargically paced Durham investigation will eventually allege — it was intricate, carefully planned by senior officials, and monstrously illegal. This latest allegation is inane and dishonest and no sane person could believe a word of it. There has been some attempt to keep it afloat by tying it to disparaging remarks Trump has made about the late Senator John McCain. The bad blood between them goes back at least to 2000, when Mr. Trump was contemplating seeking the presidency as the candidate of the Progressive Party (the default name for third parties), which was then inhabited by the imperishable Ross Perot (third party candidate in 1992 and 1996), and the governor of Minnesota, wrestler Jesse “The Body” Ventura. Mr. Trump won two primaries in 2000, but eventually recognized that third parties never win in the United States, since the rise of the Republican Party in 1856. Even Theodore Roosevelt, also running Progressive, was unable to defeat President Taft in 1912 and merely split the vote, electing the Democrat Woodrow Wilson. Before departing the race, and after a certain amount of obloquy had been thrown around on all sides, Mr. Trump referred to the two main contenders of the established parties, Republicans George W. Bush, then governor of Texas, and Senator McCain, and Democrats Vice President Al Gore, and New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley, as “a bunch of stiffs.” This was fair comment for an election campaign (and wasn’t altogether inaccurate), but only Mr. McCain seems to have been especially annoyed by it. In 2016, Mr. McCain accused Mr. Trump’s supporters in his home state of Arizona of being “crazies” and Mr. Trump replied that McCain was a “dummy.” When challenged on the point that he couldn’t say that about a war hero, Mr. Trump imprudently noted that he was a hero because of what he’d endured as a prisoner, and implied that war heroes attain their heroic status in war-making and not in captivity. It was an ungracious comment, coming from someone who did not do his best to get into action in his country’s uniform when he had the chance. But it was not an unprovoked statement and the nastiness between the two men escalated. Mr. McCain declined to support Mr. Trump’s presidential candidacy in 2016, played a role in lending credence and momentum to the Russian collusion fraud, killed the administration’s attempted reform of Obamacare despite his previous votes to repeal it, and turned his own funeral into an orgy of Trump bashing, largely by Democrats, in a ceremony that lasted for over two hours, (an hour longer than normal for a pope’s funeral). To try to keep the vicious libel of the alleged Trump disparagement of war dead alive, rodentine Jack-in-the-box Pete Buttigieg, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana and a cameo figure in this year’s Democratic presidential nomination campaign, popped up. With the motor-mouthed glibness that we still recall, he assimilated Trump’s claim that despite disagreements, he had considerable respect for John McCain, as self-evidently untruthful. Therefore, said Mayor Pete excitedly, his denial that he did not mock American war dead in Paris in 2018, though supported by everyone else who was present, was obviously a falsehood. This is the Democratic canon: malicious lies supported by stupid lies and disseminated to the world by the morally bankrupt, reflexively partisan Trump-hating media. Biden and his party retained plausible deniability, but a slime operation as egregious as this, as early as this in the campaign, is no sign of confidence by the Democrats. Email Link   https://conta.cc/3haNc5z RIP MCINTYRE

Increasingly volatile voters by Victor Davis Hanson  September 7, 2020 Joe Biden and his handlers know that he should be out and about, weighing in daily on the issues of the campaign. In impromptu interviews, Biden should be offering alternative plans for dealing with the virus, the lockdown, the economic recovery, the violence and the looting, and racial tensions. Yet Biden’s handlers seem to assume that if he were to leave his basement and fully enter the fray, he could be capable of losing the election in moments of gaffes, lapses or prolonged silences. So wisely, Team Biden relied on the fact that the commander-in-chief is always blamed for bad news–and there has been plenty of bad news worldwide this year. That reality was reflected in the spring and early summer polls that showed growing discontent with the incumbent Trump, as if he were solely responsible for one of the most depressing years in U.S. history.But news cycles, like polls, are not always static. What was true in July is not necessarily so in September and especially in November. Volatile years produce volatile voters. Now, many voters think they see a waning of the virus, a need to get their kids back in school, and a glimmer of hope that the economy is recovering. A large segment of the public is becoming irate at the nightly looting, destruction and arson that no longer seem to have much to do with the May death of George Floyd while in police custody. Where are the police, the mayors and the governors to protect the vulnerable, the law-abiding, and the small-business owners? Biden knows the mercurial polls now tell him that he must re-emerge and cease being a virtual candidate. Yet he knows that if he does, he risks losing the race. So his surrogates talk of mandatory fact-checking of the debates–or even canceling them entirely. Hillary Clinton recently said that Biden “should not concede under any circumstances,” apparently even if he loses the November election. If the rules no longer favor Biden, then it seems time to change the rules. So Biden has become a tragic prisoner of his own paradoxes. He is an old centrist who forged a Faustian bargain with socialist Bernie Sanders and his hard-core leftist supporters. That alliance was felt necessary to win the Democratic nomination and the general election. The hard left provided the urban fireworks this summer that seemed to drive down Trump’s poll numbers. Blue-state governors and mayors contextualized the violence as a “summer of love” or “largely peaceful.” Biden stayed mum–both because the polls suggested he should remain so, and because he could hardly criticize those whose often violent acts were creating a sense of national anarchy under Trump’s presidency and thus undeniably aiding the Biden candidacy. But as CNN news anchor Don Lemon recently warned his fellow leftists, the polls are changing. Lemon apparently fears that the public is sick of seeing the urban unrest. Suddenly, many members of the media want Biden to condemn the rioting and violence. But if Biden does, he might alienate his now-critical left-wing Bernie base. Yet Biden’s continued reluctance to unequivocally fault the rioters and arsonists may be alienating moderate suburban swing voters. The same paradox surrounds the debates. Should Biden, as promised, debate Trump?• Yes. But would he thereby blow up his candidacy in a moment of incoherence?• No. But would he end up ridiculed in absentia, like Clint Eastwood’s empty chair at the 2012 Republican convention? Trump never sits still. So should Biden match the president’s frenzied pace and hold town halls, impromptu interviews, tarmac rallies, photo-ops on the campaign trail and daily unscripted press conferences? But to do so could well confirm to voters that he is frail and confused. How did Biden become a prisoner of his own paradoxes? Perhaps he knew that he was not physically or cognitively up to running a real campaign. But he ran all the same. Perhaps he knew that the violence of antifa and other agitators could eventually hurt more than help him, but for months he kept silent about the violence all the same, given the perceived political damage to Trump. Perhaps he knew that he had always opposed the wacky agenda of Sanders, but Biden wrongly felt he could pose as a moderate in 2020, yet if elected, keep a promise to the socialists of the more radical wing of his party to govern as a leftist. Perhaps he knows that his new progressive allies would be happy for him to win them a presidency, but even happier for him to then disappear as soon as possible. Paradoxes happen when what seems real is not–and is known not to be real by those who act as if it is. Email Link   https://conta.cc/2GIFZx5 Rip McIntosh

Words of Our Blessed Mother

September 8, 2019

“The world is tainted with sin.

Where there should be light, there is darkness.

Where there should be holiness, there is wickedness.

Where there should be truth, there is error.

Men’s souls are tormented for they have a memory of light, of holiness, and of truth,

For they have been created in the image of God,

But the fallen tell men, “Those are false memories, for you have always been children of the dark.”

But I am sent that men might remember.

For I was born with no darkness in my soul,

And, therefore, my light is uncorrupted and pure.

Seeing me and hearing my words, man remembers that light he has known,

Though it now burns dim in his soul.

I illuminate the path for him, and the fallen flee,

And the darkness is made light.

The night I was born, the world was brighter

Because I was sent to provide a place for the Light of the World,

And He could not abide in darkness.

Therefore, I was born into light.

The Holy Trinity bathed my bed in light,

And the angels praised God in that light,

And in their praise to God, holy light fell upon me like raindrops.

The world is dark, and men’s souls have forgotten the light,

But I am here among you,

And I testify of the great light that dispels all darkness.

My birth brought light at the dawn of salvation,

For I was the foreshadowing of the light and the love of my Son,

And now in Him is the fullness of light and the fulness of love,

And now is the day of your salvation in Him.

I disperse what my Son gives.

I am the mediator of His gifts.

It is the Son who brings the gifts,

But as God shared in being human with man,

I provided a cradle for this gift by becoming the Mother of God,

And I share this gift of My Son with man.

I was called to be His Mother,

And in this calling,

I also became your Mother.

I am also the Mother of His Church.

You are baptized and united unto the Body of Christ,

And I am the Mother of all members of His Church,

So, therefore, I am the Mother of His Church.  

For in giving birth to my Son, I gave birth to each of you.

I held only my Son in my arms at His birth,

But if you have come unto my Son,

Then where He is are you also,

And, therefore, I hold you, and I am your Mother.

I was there when the Holy Spirit descended at Pentecost,

And I was witness to the birth of His Church,

And I am the spiritual Mother of the Church.

The fallen now attack the Church,

And I cry out to my children to listen to my words,

For my words dispel darkness.

For in my words the path to my Son is illuminated,

And He is the source of all light.

My children, return to me and sit at my knee,

And remember the truths you were taught as a child.

Depart not from these truths.  

For a great light has come into the world,

And in this light is all truth,

And the darkness is made light in Him.

Heed my words,

For there is much calamity to come if men continue to walk in the dark.

But look to your Mother.

For I was born into light to prepare a cradle for the Light of the World,

And I will illuminate the path to Him if you will take my hand.”

-S

The Coming Coup?Democrats are laying the groundwork for revolution right in front of our eyes.

BY: Michael Anton

September 4, 2020

As if 2020 were not insane enough already, we now have Democrats and their ruling class masters openly talking about staging a coup.

 
You might have missed it, what with the riots, lockdowns and other daily mayhem we’re forced to endure in this, the most wretched year of my lifetime. But it’s happening. 

It started with the military brass quietly indicating that the troops should not follow a presidential order. They were bolstered by many former generals—including President Trump’s own first Secretary of Defense—who stated openly what the brass would only hint at. 

Then, as nationwide riots really got rolling in early June, the sitting Secretary of Defense himself all but publicly told the president not to invoke the Insurrection Act. His implicit message was: “Mr. President, don’t tell us to do that, because we won’t, and you know what happens after that.” All this enthused Joe Biden, who threw subtlety to the winds. 

The former United States Senator (for 26 years) and Vice President (for eight) has not once, not twice, but thrice confidently asserted that the military will “escort [Trump] from the White House with great dispatch” should the president refuse to leave. Another former Vice President, Al Gore, publicly agreed. 

One might dismiss such comments as the ravings of a dementia patient and a has-been who never got over his own electoral loss. But before you do, consider also this. Over the summer a story was deliberately leaked to the press of a meeting at which 100 Democratic grandees, anti-Trump former Republicans, and other ruling class apparatchiks got together (on George Soros’s dime) to “game out” various outcomes of the 2020 election. 

One such outcome was a clear Trump win. In that eventuality, former Bill Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, playing Biden, refused to concede, pressured states that Trump won to send Democrats to the formal Electoral College vote, and trusted that the military would take care of the rest. The leaked report from the exercise darkly concluded that “technocratic solutions, courts, and reliance on elites observing norms are not the answer here,” promising that what would follow the November election would be “a street fight, not a legal battle.”

 
Two more data points (among several that could be provided). Over the summer, two former Army officers, both prominent in the Democrat-aligned “national security” think tank world, wrote an open letter to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in which they urged him to deploy the 82nd Airborne Division to drag President Trump from the Oval Office at precisely 12:01 PM, January 20, 2021. 

About a month later, Hillary Clinton declared publicly that Joe Biden should not concede the election “under any circumstances.” The old English major in me interprets the word “any” to mean “no,” “none,” “nada,” “niente,” “zero,” “zilch” “bupkis”…you get the idea.

This doesn’t sound like the rhetoric of a political party confident it will win an upcoming election. The Cover-Up in Plain Sight. These items are, to repeat, merely a short but representative list of what Byron York recently labeled “coup porn.” York seems to think this is just harmless fantasizing on the part of the ruling class and its Democratic servants. For some of them, no doubt that’s true. But for all of them? 
I’m not so sure. In his famously exhaustive discussion of conspiracies, Machiavelli goes out of his way to emphasize the indispensability of “operational security”—i.e., silence—to success. 

The first rule of conspiracy is, you do not talk about the conspiracy. The second rule of conspiracy is, you do not talk about the conspiracy. 

So why are the Democrats—publicly—talking about the conspiracy? Because they know that, for it to succeed, it must not look like a conspiracy. They need to plant the idea in the public mind, now, that their unlawful and illegitimate removal of President Trump from office will somehow be his fault. Never mind the pesky detail that the president would refuse to leave only if he were convinced he legitimately won. Remember: Biden should not concede under any circumstances. 

The second part of the plan is either to produce enough harvested ballots—lawfully or not—to tip close states, or else dispute the results in close states and insist, no matter what the tally says, that Biden won them. 

The worst-case scenario (for the country, but not for the ruling class) would be results in a handful of states that are so ambiguous and hotly disputed that no one can rightly say who won. Of course, that will not stop the Democrats from insisting that they won. 

The public preparation for that has also already begun: streams of stories and social media posts “explaining” how, while on election night it might look as if Trump won, close states will tip to Biden as all the mail-in ballots are “counted.”

 
The third piece is to get the vast and loud Dem-Left propaganda machine ready for war. That leaked report exhorted Democrats to identify “key influencers in the media and among local activists who can affect political perceptions and mobilize political action…[who could] establish pre-commitments to playing a constructive role in event of a contested election.” I.e., in blaring from every rooftop that “Trump lost.” 
At this point, it’s safe to assume that unless Trump wins in a blowout that can’t be overcome by cheating and/or denied via the ruling class’s massive propaganda operation, that’s exactly what every Democratic politician and media organ will shout. Stop the Presses What then? The Podesta assumption is that the military will side with the Dems. 

There are reasons to fear they might. The Obama administration spent a great deal of political capital purging the officer corps of anyone not down with the program and promoting only those who are. Still and all, determining the outcome of an election would be the most open political interference possible from our allegedly apolitical military, and it’s plausible that the brass won’t want to make its quiet support of the ruling class agenda that overt

. The aforementioned Chairman has already stated that the military will play “no role” in the outcome of the election. That’s probably not a feint, but one wonders if it will hold given the obvious attempt to influence military thinking by people like Jeffrey Goldberg in his recent Atlantic essay. 

Can the Dems rely on the Secret Service to drag Trump out? I have my doubts on this one. I’ve seen the Service up close; it really is (or strongly appears to be) apolitical. It has a job to do: protect the president, whoever that is. Officers take that job very seriously. If they don’t believe Trump lost, I don’t think they can be counted on to oust him. On the other hand, were they to believe he did lose and was refusing to leave—a scenario I find impossible to imagine but the Democrats insist is just around the corner—it’s possible the Service might act. 

Barring all that, what’s left? Remember that phrase from the Dem war game: “street fight.” In other words, a repeat of this summer, only much, much bigger. Crank the propaganda to ear-drum shattering decibels and fill the streets of every major city with “protesters.” Shut down the country and allow only one message to be heard: “Trump must go.” I.e., what’s come to be known as a “color revolution,” the exact same playbook the American deep state runs in other countries whose leadership they don’t like and is currently running in Belarus. 

Oust a leader—even an elected one—through agitation and call it “democracy.” The events of the last few months may be interpreted as an attempted color revolution that failed to gain enough steam, or as a trial run for the fall. Is the Trump Administration prepared? Here’s one thing they could do: play their own “war game” scenario so as to game out possibilities and minimize surprises. They should also be talking to people inside and outside of government whom they absolutely trust to get a clearer sense of who on the inside won’t go along with a coup and who might. They also need to set up or shore up—now—communication channels that don’t rely on the media or Big Tech. 

Once the ruling class gives word that the narrative is “Trump lost,” all the president’s social media accounts will be suspended. The T.V. channels, with the likely exception of Fox News, will refuse to cover anything he says. Count on it. He’s going to need a way to talk to the American people and he has to find the means, now. 

For the rest of us, the most important thing we can do is raise awareness. If there is a conspiracy to remove President Trump from office even if he wins, they’re telling you about it precisely to get you ready for it, so that when it happens you won’t think it was a conspiracy; you’ll blame the president. Don’t be fooled.

Michael Anton is a lecturer and research fellow at Hillsdale College’s Washington, D.C. campus, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute, and a former national security official in the Trump administration. He is the author of The Stakes: America at the Point of No Return.

Email Link  https://conta.cc/327DV9X

RIP MCINTOSH

The American Spectator
Melissa Mackenzie
Publisher
Mackenzie

I don’t know where we are on the arc of history. I don’t know if all is lost. I don’t know if Michael Anton is right – that there is a Coming Coup. His case is strong and bolstered by The American Spectator’s own George Parry who believes that delayed mail-in ballots, many “found” after a Trump landslide, will throw the country into a crisis and possibly civil war. You can watch my interview with George here. What I do know is that there have been many times is history where the decisions of one person stemmed the tide of evil. I know that one small person of courage can make a big difference. Vasily Archipov, Norman Borlaug, Nelson Mandela are examples of courage; the courage to question, to create, to reconcile. The Left is fond of saying that “Love Trumps Hate” and they’re not wrong. It’s just a shame that so much of their “love” includes violence, destruction, burning, rage, and murder. If they believed their own words, they would act differently, and their message could result in more of the change they’d like to see. As it is, they’re evaporating good will with every brick and punch thrown. They are bending the arc of history away from themselves. The Left is lost. Have you ever seen such a sad rabble? Confused, lonely, weird, alienated, warped, deviant, criminal. The dispossessed. Only love can heal these wounds. Only a Power greater than their vast chasm of emptiness can fill them. Three times I’ve seen a man who was eventually shot screaming into another person’s face or calmly looking into the camera taunting, begging to be killed…to have his life matter for something even a pathetic lost, in every sense of the word, cause. All three times, the death came within minutes, hours, a day. These people believed a lie: that they have nothing to lose. They believed that there is no hope of redemption for them; therefore there’s no redemption for anyone. They believe that they were beyond salvation and so, they’d take the world with them. Suicide is an evil. There is always hope. Too many in our country lay on the streets, drugged, debauched. It is shameful. Too few help them. Too many pay too much in taxes and their hearts harden at the need they see. Let the government take care of them. But the government is woefully inadequate to the task of healing a broken spirit. So what must we do? We must find our courage and keep doing. We must create, plan, build, restore, protect, defend, heal, feed, clothe, repent, reconcile, save. We must remember that all men are create equal. We must build our own lives and we must help those who do not believe in their own ability to begin again. Above all, we must have charity. And when we don’t know what to do, we must pray.2 Chronicles 7:14 if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

The Stunning Synergy Of The Atlantic’s Anonymous Attack On Trump

Real News Real PatriotsSeptember 6, 20207min

The Atlantic published a story Thursday evening that claimed President Donald Trump called the fallen American soldiers in a World War I cemetery “suckers” and “losers” in 2018. The author, Jeffrey Goldberg, cited four anonymous sources.

Nearly a dozen current and former Trump administration officials disputed the story. One, notably, was John Bolton, the former national security adviser who says he will not vote for Trump. “I was there,” he said, and “I didn’t hear that.

Other claims in The Atlantic story are refuted by documentary evidence. The article claims, for instance, that Trump refused to visit the cemetery because the rain would ruin his hair. Bolton’s tell-all book said otherwise; so do official documents.

What is more interesting than the details of the story is how it was produced, and how it was rolled out. It has the appearance of a well-coordinated, well-executed campaign of disinformation, utilizing the full toolbox available to the Democratic Party.

The article was published Thursday evening. By Friday morning, a left-wing group called Vote Vets had not only produced an ad based on the article, but had aired it on Morning Joe — MSNBC’s early-morning flagship news and opinion show.

Meanwhile, the article spread across social media like a brush fire in a derecho. It trended at the top of Twitter; it was shared widely on Facebook, all without any of the “fact checks” that typically accompany disputed news reports on such platforms.

The Biden campaign issued a statement Thursday night — “If the revelations in today’s Atlantic article are true” — and held a press call Friday morning. The call featured, among others, Khizr Khan — the Gold Star father who attacked Trump in 2016.

A short time later, Biden himself held a press briefing on the U.S. economy. Though he was expected to discuss the August jobs report — which came in better than expected, at 1.4 million jobs added — he led with an angry tirade about the article.

At the end of his presentation, Biden turned to his campaign staff, who chose which reporters would be allowed to ask questions, and in what order. The first question went to Edward-Isaac Dovere, who writes for — surprise! — The Atlantic.

Dovere asked, “When you hear these remarks — ‘suckers,’ ‘losers,’ recoiling from amputees — what does it tell you about President Trump’s soul, and the life he leads?” It was a setup for Biden to attack Trump over The Atlantic allegations again.

None of the other questions asked were challenging in any way; all appeared to be setup questions for Biden to attack Trump or to clarify some lingering problem — whether he had been tested for coronavirus (yes), where his running mate was (busy).

No one asked Biden whether it was appropriate to attack Trump based on an unconfirmed report. No one even asked Biden about his economic policies.

What we witnessed Thursday night into Friday morning was the deployment of the Death Star — the full Democrat-media complex on display, coordinating journalists, outside political organizations, tech platforms, and unnamed military sources.

It may be no coincidence that retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal — who was fired, ironically, because he had disparaged President Barack Obama and Biden — now advises a firm using military technology to help Democrats produce propaganda.

It took weapons-grade skill to produce a story that, while unprovable, had the ring of truth to those eager to believe it (it “resonates,” said NBC’s Peter Alexander, whether it was true or not) and to make it the dominant story of the news cycle — on a day when the jobs market rebounded and Trump brokered a historic deal between Israel and Muslim-majority Kosovo.

Goldberg — the unofficial stenographer of the Obama White House — was just a vehicle. The real story is much bigger.

The same machine that created and promoted The Atlantic piece will be sure to produce others.

Author : Joel B. Pollak

Source : Breitbart : Pollak: The Stunning Synergy of The Atlantic’s Anonymous Attack on Trump Post Views: 122

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

• HOME
• CONTACT

NEWS

Atlantic Owner Is Biden Megadonor, Close To Author

Published 1 day ago 

on September 6, 2020

ByConservative Freedom Network

Sixth Witness, Trump Opponent, Disputes Story

The billionaire owner of The Atlantic, a left-wing magazine, is a Democrat megadonor who has donated a substantial amount of money to Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden.

Philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs — who has donated more than $1.2 million to nearly 70 Democrat politicians since 2019 — is reportedly in close contact with the journalist who published the hit piece on President Donald Trump that claimed, based only on anonymous sources, that Trump called dead American soldiers “losers” and “suckers.”

Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) investigative reporter Andrew Kerr reported that Jobs obtained a 70% ownership stake in The Atlantic through her firm.

The DCNF reported:

In November, she further solidified her control over the magazine after its longtime chairman, David Bradley, said he was going to step away from management, according to Politico. …

Ron Paul’s Urgent New Message For Every AmericanWhat’s Really at Stake with the 2020 ElectionWatch Video 32,560

Powell Jobs contributed $2,800 to former Vice President Joe Biden’s primary campaign in October, and in June she divvied out an additional $610,600 to the Biden Victory Fund. …

Goldberg and Powell Jobs did not return requests for comment asking if Powell Jobs had any involvement in or had any advanced knowledge of Goldberg’s anonymously-sourced story.

The DCNF further noted that a hard-left political group had launched digital advertisements attacking Trump just hours after the story broke where the group included multiple remarks from gold star families and somehow managed to have all of this done in just a matter of hours.

On Friday, fierce Trump opponent John Bolton came out and strongly disputed The Atlantic’s report, saying that he was there on the trip where the remarks allegedly occurred yet he never heard anything along the lines of what they claimed happened.

“I didn’t hear either of those comments or anything even resembling them. I was there at the point in time that morning when it was decided that he would not go Aisne-Marne cemetery,” Bolton told Fox News. “He decided not to do it because of John Kelly’s recommendation. It was entirely a weather-related decision, and I thought the proper thing to do. I never heard he made that kind of comment about another country’s forces either, no.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1302133965084667906&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fconservativefreedomnetwork.com%2Fatlantic-owner-is-biden-megadonor-close-to-author%2F%3Futm_source%3DEmail_marketing%26utm_campaign%3DContent_09.07.20%26cmp%3D1%26utm_medium%3DHTMLEmail&theme=light&widgetsVersion=219d021%3A1598982042171&width=550px

Fox News correspondent John Roberts further added: “. @AmbJohnBolton told me today that if @realDonaldTrump had said he didn’t want to visit Aisne-Marne because the interred heroes were “losers” and “suckers”, he would have written an entire chapter about it in his book #TheRoomWhereItHappened.”

Roberts added, “Bolton was in the room with POTUS when the decisions were being made.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-1&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1302007074042392576&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fconservativefreedomnetwork.com%2Fatlantic-owner-is-biden-megadonor-close-to-author%2F%3Futm_source%3DEmail_marketing%26utm_campaign%3DContent_09.07.20%26cmp%3D1%26utm_medium%3DHTMLEmail&theme=light&widgetsVersion=219d021%3A1598982042171&width=550px

Bolton stated in his memoir that President Trump canceled a visit to Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris over weather, undercutting a key claim in a recent story from The Atlantic that the president scrapped the trip because of the ‘losers’ and ‘suckers’ buried there,” The Daily Wire reported on Friday.

On the canceled trip to Aisne-Marne, Bolton writes:

On Saturday, I went to the U.S. Ambassador’s residence, where Trump was staying, to brief him for his bilateral with [French President Emmanuel Macron]. The weather was bad and [former Chief of Staff John Kelly] and I spoke about whether to travel as planned to the Chateau-Thierry Belleau Woods monuments and nearby American Cemeteries, where many U.S. World War I were buried. Marine One’s crew were saying that bad visibility could make it imprudent to chopper to the cemetery. The ceiling was not too low for Marines to fly in combat, but flying POTUS was obviously something very different. If a motorcade were necessary, it could take between ninety and a hundred and twenty minutes each way, along roads that were not exactly freeways, posing an unacceptable risk that we could not get the President out of France quickly enough in case of an emergency. It was a straightforward decision to cancel the visit but very hard for a Marine like Kelly to recommend, having originally been the one to suggest Belleau Wood (an iconic battle in Marine Corps history). Trump agreed, and it was decided that others would drive to the cemetery instead.

The press turned canceling the military visit into a story that Trump was afraid of the rain and took glee in pointing out that other world leaders traveled around during the day. Of course, none of them were President of the United States, but the press didn’t understand that rules for US presidents are different from the rules for 190 other leaders who don’t command the world’s greatest military forces.

Bolton is now the sixth witness who was there that day who says that The Atlantic’s report was false.

Author : Ryan Saavedra

Source : Daily Wire : Atlantic Owner Is Biden Megadonor, Close To Story’s Author. Sixth Witness, Trump Opponent, Disputes Story.

“Demonic Influence”: “BLM Leaders Call on the Spirits of the Dead” including Porn Actor George Floyd

September 07, 2020

“We can now trace this demonic influence one step further, with the open, unapologetic statements of two key BLM leaders. I’m speaking about BLM cofounder Patrisse Cullors and professor Melina Abdullah, chair of the department of Pan-African Studies at California State University, Los Angeles, and a co-founder of the Los Angeles chapter of Black Lives Matter.”

“Their relevant video discussion on Facebook was posted on June 13. But even before that, on June 9, Heba Farrag posted an article on the Berkeley Center website titled, ‘The Fight for Black Lives is a Spiritual Movement.'”

“Farrag explained how Abdullah met with a BLM group in front of the house of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti: “She led the group in a ritual: the reciting of names of those taken by state violence before their time – ancestors now being called back to animate their own justice: “‘George Floyd. . Asé. Philandro Castille. Asé. Andrew Joseph. Asé. Michael Brown. Asé. Eric Garner. Asé. Harriet Tubman. Asé. Malcom X. Asé. Martin Luther King. Asé.’

“As each name is recited, Dr. Abdullah poured libations on the ground as the group of over 100 chanted ‘Asé,’ a Yoruba term often used by practitioners of Ifa, a faith and divination system that originated in West Africa, in return. This ritual, Dr. Abdullah explained, is a form of worship.” – World Net Daily

It appears that leaders of Black Live Matters on a video discussed “how they ‘worship.'” World Net Daily revealed that the BLM leaders use a pagan “divination.. worship” where they “call on the spirits of the dead” including porn actor George Floyd. According to the Zimbabwe news outlet iharare.com”George Floyd [was a] Porn Star!” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-fountain-of-propaganda-was-george.html?m=1]

 Here is World Net Daily’s Michael Brown’s article:

Is it true that leaders of the BLM movement, including one of the cofounders, are calling on the spirits of the dead? That they claim to receive spiritual power from the deceased? That they talk with these spirits and even give them names? The answer to all these questions is yes. This is now an open secret.

Lest you think that this type of “spirituality” is exceedingly rare, I remind you that in October 2019, the New York Times ran a story titled, “When Did Everybody Become a Witch?” The article claimed that, “We have reached peak witch,” noting, “Real witches are roaming among us, and they’re seemingly everywhere.”

Yes, “Witches are influencers who use the hashtag #witchesofinstagram to share horoscopes, spells and witchy memes, and they are anti-Trump resistance activists carrying signs that say “Hex the Patriarchy” (also the title of a new book of spells), and “We are the granddaughters of the witches you weren’t able to burn.”

I documented this phenomenon in my book, “Jezebel’s War with America,” also arguing that many of the major trends in our society could be traced back to this “Jezebelic” spirit. These include the rise of pornography; the shout your abortion movement; radical feminism; the emasculating of men; the war on gender; the rise of witchcraft and sorcery; and the silencing of the prophetic voice of the church.

With the rise of the BLM movement, we have further evidence of this Jezebelic influence, as the cofounders are all radical feminists, with two of the three identifying as queer. (Please note that I use the initials BLM to distinguish this Marxist-based movement from the important affirmation that black lives do matter.)

We can now trace this demonic influence one step further, with the open, unapologetic statements of two key BLM leaders. I’m speaking about BLM cofounder Patrisse Cullors and professor Melina Abdullah, chair of the department of Pan-African Studies at California State University, Los Angeles, and a co-founder of the Los Angeles chapter of Black Lives Matter.

Their relevant video discussion on Facebook was posted on June 13. But even before that, on June 9, Heba Farrag posted an article on the Berkeley Center website titled, “The Fight for Black Lives is a Spiritual Movement.”

Farrag explained how Abdullah met with a BLM group in front of the house of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti: “She led the group in a ritual: the reciting of names of those taken by state violence before their time – ancestors now being called back to animate their own justice:

“‘George Floyd. Asé. Philandro Castille. Asé. Andrew Joseph. Asé. Michael Brown. Asé. Eric Garner. Asé. Harriet Tubman. Asé. Malcom X. Asé. Martin Luther King. Asé.’

“As each name is recited, Dr. Abdullah poured libations on the ground as the group of over 100 chanted ‘Asé,’ a Yoruba term often used by practitioners of Ifa, a faith and divination system that originated in West Africa, in return. This ritual, Dr. Abdullah explained, is a form of worship.”

Yes, this helps fuel the fires of the BLM movement: worship of the dead; calling on the dead; asking the spirits of the dead to empower the living today.

Abdullah and Cullors discussed this openly on their Facebook video, which Abraham Hamilton III brought to national attention on his daily radio show on Aug. 13, playing relevant clips, in context.

In the video, professor Abdullah stated that “we become very intimate with the spirits that we call on regularly. Right, like, each of them seems to have a different presence and personality. You know, I laugh a lot with Wakisha, you know, and I didn’t meet her in her body. Right, I met her through this work.”

Yes, the spirits of the dead even have names, like Wakisha, with whom Abdullah exchanges some laughs.

Cullors, in response, explained how she has been empowered by these spirits and how the mantra to “say his (or, her) name” was more than a slogan. It was an appeal to the spirits of the deceased to rise up and work through her and others.

As summed up by Cullors, “The fight to save your life is a spiritual fight.”

Of course, she is entirely right. The battles we fight in our society are, ultimately, spiritual battles. But victory is found, not in calling on the spirits of the dead but in calling on the Spirit of the living God.

As we have been emphasizing for months now, one is from below; the other is from above. One brings death, the other brings life.

Let the reader be aware. Fully aware. Calling on the spirits of the dead is a practice you want to avoid at all costs – for your own soul’s sake.[https://www.wnd.com/2020/09/jezebelic-blm-leaders-call-spirits-dead/]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.SHARE

Fred Martinez