“WHAT, ME WORRY?”


Joe Biden handed something over to the Taliban that could get him impeached

Americans could not believe what Joe Biden just did.

It could be the worst betrayal by an American President in history.

And Joe Biden handed something over to the Taliban that could get him impeached.

Joe Biden so badly botched the withdrawal from Afghanistan that Biden ended up having to depend on the Taliban to evacuate American citizens from Afghanistan.

Biden gave up Bagram Air Force Base, which forced the military into a defensive posture at Kabul Airport, which the Taliban immediately surrounded with checkpoints.

By choosing the course of action, the administration abandoned the fates of thousands of Americans to the Taliban.

Biden claimed they planned for every contingency, but POLITICO exposed that to be a lie when they reported that the Biden administration turned over lists of Americans and Afghan allies to the Taliban in hopes the Taliban could get U.S. citizens and Afghan partners through the checkpoint.

POLITICO exclusively reports:

U.S. officials in Kabul gave the Taliban a list of names of American citizens, green card holders and Afghan allies to grant entry into the militant-controlled outer perimeter of the city’s airport, a choice that’s prompted outrage behind the scenes from lawmakers and military officials.

The move, detailed to POLITICO by three U.S. and congressional officials, was designed to expedite the evacuation of tens of thousands of people from Afghanistan as chaos erupted in Afghanistan’s capital city last week after the Taliban seized control of the country. It also came as the Biden administration has been relying on the Taliban for security outside the airport.

No one could believe Biden could be so stupid as to turnover what amounted to kill lists after reports that Taliban squads went door-to-door looking for Americans and Afghans who assisted the U.S. military.

“So, yes there have been occasions like that. To the best of my knowledge, in those cases, the bulk of that has occurred and they have been let through,” Biden said in response to a question about providing the Taliban with a kill list.

Biden’s dereliction of duty only led to more Republicans calling on Biden to resign or for Congress to draft articles of impeachment.

And if the GOP takes back Congress next year, many expect impeachment to happen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “WHAT, ME WORRY?”

Joseph Biden may be making decisions—decisions that are harming the world—but he’s not the leader we need. Biden ignored intelligence from his own military officials to create the disaster that is Afghanistan. His botched withdrawal led to a humanitarian crisis—and a devastating terror attack.

We The People Daily

Biden Continues To Flee From Reporters – Finally Confesses Why

August 30, 2021

For a long time, Americans had to wonder if Biden was really the president. But ever since the fall of Afghanistan, we know he isn’t.

Sure, he may be making decisions—decisions that are harming the world—but he’s not the leader we need. Biden ignored intelligence from his own military officials to create the disaster that is Afghanistan. His botched withdrawal led to a humanitarian crisis—and a devastating terror attack.

In less than a day, U.S. military will be removed entirely from the country. Yet word remains that Americans and Afghan allies will be left behind. Worse than that, the vacuum left from our absence will attract more terrorists to the Taliban-run nation.

All the while, Biden has failed to show true leadership and resolve. On top of that, Americans must still wonder if he is fully in charge at the White House. Just take a look at what happened recently.

President Joe Biden refused to answer questions on Sunday about the crisis in Afghanistan that was caused by decisions that were made under his leadership.

“Biden was at FEMA to address the response to Hurricane Ida, which strengthened to a Category 4 before making landfall in Louisiana earlier Sunday,” Fox News reported…

“I’m not supposed to take any questions, but go ahead,” Biden said at the end of his remarks.

“Mr. President, on Afghanistan–” Bloomberg News reporter Jennifer Jacobs began.

“I’m not going to answer Afghanistan now,” Biden fired back.

“–can you say if there’s still an acute risk at the airport, sir?” Jacobs finished.

Biden then turned his back on Jacobs and stopped taking questions from reporters. [Source: Daily Wire]

Once again, Biden said he was “not supposed” to take questions. This remark, and similar ones, he’s said in the past, sparking concerns that Biden is taking orders from someone else. Since when does a president say he’s “not supposed” to interact with the media? Unless, of course, this “president” does the bidding of handlers who run most of what goes on in the White House?

The moment the reporter says the word “Afghanistan,” Biden turns his back on her. Mind you, this wasn’t a Fox News reporter trying to trap Biden in one of their tricky questions, but someone from left-leading Bloomberg.

For Biden to turn his back on a liberal reporter? The man must really fear being forced to answer for his terrible decisions.

Even the liberal media has struggled to protect Joe Biden in the aftermath of Afghanistan. Reporters that once covered for him are now calling him out over his terrible decisions. And his continued stubbornness, arrogance, and lack of authority only makes him look worse.

But problems continue to brew in Afghanistan. Come August 31, there will be no more U.S. military on the ground. What about those left behind? And what will happen to a nation clearly infiltrated by terrorists?

These are legitimate questions that Biden refuses to answer.

Author: Peter Smith

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Joseph Biden may be making decisions—decisions that are harming the world—but he’s not the leader we need. Biden ignored intelligence from his own military officials to create the disaster that is Afghanistan. His botched withdrawal led to a humanitarian crisis—and a devastating terror attack.

HOW CAN YOU THINK STRAIGHT AND MAKE RATIONAL DECISIONS WHEN EACH AND EVERY DAY YOU HEAR conflicting and contradictory information from “authoritative” sources? You can’t. No one can. That’s the whole point. That’s why the powers that be are doing this. Welcome to the secular hell of a post-truth world. 

GAB

How To Survive In a Post-Truth World Of Chaos

How can you think straight and make rational decisions when each and everyday you hear conflicting and contradictory information from “authoritative” sources? You can’t. No one can. That’s the whole point. That’s why the powers that be are doing this. Welcome to the secular hell of a post-truth world. 

We don’t need to wear masks. No wait, now we do. Hold up now we need to wear two masks. We can stop wearing masks now. Surprise, we need to wear masks again. Actually it turns out masks aren’t as effective as we thought.

We just need 15 days to slow the spread. Now we need a month. Maybe a year. Never mind, we didn’t need to lockdown at all and it caused more harm than good. 

Don’t take any vaccine that Donald Trump rushed to market. You didn’t get the vaccine, are you nuts? The vaccine is highly effective. Oops it looks like highly vaccinated Israel is having a major outbreak. Get the vaccine or lose your job. 

Are you keeping up? This is the reality of living in a post-truth world.

They want us shell shocked with rapidly changing information overload which leads to option paralysis and fear. When people are in a state of fear coupled with option paralysis they are very susceptible to manipulation and easy to control.

While we are all dazed and confused they are destroying families, small businesses, and entire nations. They are rigging elections, they are botching troop withdrawals to flood western countries with refugees, the American border is being invaded by hundreds of thousands of people, they are buying up single family homes and pricing you out of the market, they are printing endless money and inflating your currency.

They are transferring trillions of dollars in wealth to themselves and shutting up each and every last voice of dissent to it all while doing it. 

All while the while you worry about a virus that statistically you have a 99% chance of surviving with the immune system God gave you.

It’s exhausting and impossible to keep up with by design. It’s meant to drain you mentally, physically, and spiritually so that you submit to their control. Don’t.

In the post-truth world anything goes. Chaos reigns. Those who create the chaos manifest their means of control. Do not comply. Do not give them one inch. Stand your ground. Hold the line.

Christians reject the post-truth world. We have absolute Truth in Jesus Christ and His Gospel as a firm foundation on which to stand. God is our authority. Not the CDC. Not the Biden administration. Not the WHO. Nor the talking heads on CNN and Fox News.

In the darkness of chaos Jesus is the Light that leads us to salvation. Jesus saves. That is the fundamental Truth of the Gospel. Now more then ever we need saving. We need Truth. We need Order.

The battle rages on, but the war has already been won and we must never forget that. We must cling to the cross and stand firm in our convictions. We must love one another, obey God, and humble ourselves enough to fully depend on Him in this time of great trial.

I know we can do it, because we serve the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords, the Creator of the universe. May you find comfort in His Truth and keep the faith.

God bless you and God bless America,

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Jesus is King

  • Tags
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on HOW CAN YOU THINK STRAIGHT AND MAKE RATIONAL DECISIONS WHEN EACH AND EVERY DAY YOU HEAR conflicting and contradictory information from “authoritative” sources? You can’t. No one can. That’s the whole point. That’s why the powers that be are doing this. Welcome to the secular hell of a post-truth world. 

Catholic League president Bill Donohue speaks to the issue of school choice: As we begin the new school year, school choice has never been more important than it is now. Coming off a year where approximately 6 in 10 public school students worked from home and did not attend class—as many as 6 percent skipped school altogether—parents need to be given the choice of sending their children to a Catholic school or a Christian school. For starters, unlike their public school competitors, most of those schools stayed open.


School Choice Never More Important
August 30, 2021
Catholic League president Bill Donohue speaks to the issue of school choice:
As we begin the new school year, school choice has never been more important than it is now. Coming off a year where approximately 6 in 10 public school students worked from home and did not attend class—as many as 6 percent skipped school altogether—parents need to be given the choice of sending their children to a Catholic school or a Christian school. For starters, unlike their public school competitors, most of those schools stayed open.
Last year was a mixed year for Catholic schools. While enrollment was down, the demand for Catholic schools was evident in states where school choice programs were operative. There are many good reasons why parents elect to send their children to a Catholic school when allotted a voucher or other school choice initiative.
The Catholic school student-teacher ratio hovers around 13:1, considerably lower than in the public schools. Almost all, 99%, of Catholic school high school students graduate; of those, almost 90% go to college. Minority students benefit the most: they are more likely to graduate from high school and attend college than their peers who go to a public school. That’s because academic achievement is greater in Catholic schools. They are also much safer, with less student misbehavior.
A recent survey by the Herzog Foundation found that in the Protestant community, parents who sent their children to Christian schools last year were much more satisfied with the results than were parents who sent their children to a public school. Like the Catholic schools, Christian schools were much more likely to stay open during the pandemic, making it easier for parents to manage their child’s assignments; their children also exhibited good morale.
Other alternatives to traditional public school education are charter schools and homeschooling. Both witnessed a spike last year. Florida led the way, with more school-choice reforms than any other state.
School choice is making headway, though 19 states still have no such program, and many of those that do need to be expanded. Survey after survey shows that parents overwhelmingly want school choice, and this is especially true in minority communities. But resistance from teachers’ unions, and their Democratic allies in government (whom they lavishly grease), continue to stand in the way of progress.
Many of those who oppose school choice like to talk about “intersectionality,” a condition where demographic variables such as race and class intersect, often with horrific consequences for those at the bottom of the socio-economic scale.
These anti-choice activists are phonies—they should instead speak about their contributions to intersectionality.  
To be exact, those who deny school choice are promoting a sick milieu where race and class merge. After all, it is black and brown people from low-income neighborhoods who are the most likely to be victimized when school choice does not exist. By consigning them to schools which white affluent parents would never choose for their own children, the proponents of intersectionality are maximizing the very phenomenon they purport to loathe.
School choice is the wave of the future. It is time to label its opponents as generators of race and class discrimination. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Catholic League president Bill Donohue speaks to the issue of school choice: As we begin the new school year, school choice has never been more important than it is now. Coming off a year where approximately 6 in 10 public school students worked from home and did not attend class—as many as 6 percent skipped school altogether—parents need to be given the choice of sending their children to a Catholic school or a Christian school. For starters, unlike their public school competitors, most of those schools stayed open.

The Church recognizes that every human person is created in the image and likeness of God, male or female (Gen. 1:26-27). And so we should help people discover their true identities as children of God, not support them in the disordered attempt to reject their undeniable biological identity.  

Print allIn new windowLetter #95, 2021, Monday, August 30: ShrierInboxDr. Robert Moynihan via icontactmail4.com 11:44 AM (52 minutes ago)to me    Above, a redacted “Gender Support Plan” in place in a New York middle school district, sent to Wall Street Journal writer Abigail Schrierby the mother of a 12-year-old girl who is asking that she be called “they/them.” The school district kept this “gender change” secret from the mother, and the mother might not have known about it at all, but for the guilty conscience of a teacher (link). Schrier writes: “For much of the daughter’s 7th grade, the school was not only referring to her daughter by a boy’s name, it was providing the daughter with ‘gender counseling’ and providing this ‘gender support’ — all a secret from the child’s parents.” Schrier believes legislation should be passed making it illegal to deceive parents about what is happening to their children in school    “Secrets between teachers and students are common signs of sexual abuse… which in my opinion is exactly what this is.” —JC Collins, a reader of the Abigail Shrier article published below    ”Schools have been inserting themselves between parents and kids for a long time. It started with the emphasis on ‘feelings’ and the push to make being a teenager a mental illness requiring medication.” —June Maulfair, a reader of the Abigail Schrier article published below    ”One additional blessing that comes from the COVID phenomenon is that many more parents have chosen to teach their children at home, or in smaller and more controlled circumstances, such as several-family schools… parents are the best teachers, no one loves or cares for a child like a parent, and no one can instill the desired virtues and values like a parent. We’re crazy to expect any level of that from public schooling, despite the teacher claims of how much they love our children. Clearly, they do not.” —Dana Jumper, a reader of the article by Abigail Shrier published below        ”Some school systems expressly prohibit schools from letting parents know that their children have preferred, different names and pronouns. Take New Jersey for example. Under the State’s Law Against Discrimination, the NJ Department of Education has issued ‘Guidelines’ that prohibit schools from informing parents. It actually states: ‘There may be instances where a parent or guardian of a minor student disagrees with the student regarding the name and pronoun to be used at school and in the student’s education records. A parent or guardian may object to the minor student’s name change request. School districts should consult their board attorney regarding the minor student’s civil rights and protections under the NJLAD. Staff should continue to refer to the student in accordance with the student’s chosen name and pronoun at school…’” —a reader named Dee, commenting on the Abigail Shrier article published below    ”The U.S. Constitution guarantees ‘the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.’ Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 US 510, 534-535 (1925). The Supreme Court has explained: ” It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.” Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 US 158, 166 (1944). The “It Takes a Village” lobby notwithstanding, the law of the United States is clear: “The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.” Pierce v. Society of Sisters, supra at 535.” —Joel Lumer, a reader, commenting on the Abigail Shrier article published below    ***    Letter #95, 2021, Monday, August 30: Author Abigail Shrier on schools deceiving parents about their children    I just now read an essay by American writer Abigail Schrier, who has written a courageous book on the “transgendering” of American children, entitled Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters (2020, Regnery Publishing). (link).     The essay seems to be based on facts, so I consider it important to share it. (Full text of the troubling essay below)    Shrier describes an increasing division between parents and childrenon the issue of gender and “transgender” — one more division, one more pressure to divide families, in a time when the family is already under enormous centrifugal strain and pressure.    Shrier gives the example of a 12-year-old girl in a New York middle school who has asked her school teachers and classmates not to be called “she” but “they/them.”     Shrier writes: “Here is a redacted ‘Gender Support Plan’ in place in a NY middle school district, sent to me by the mom of a 12-year-old girl. The school district kept this ‘gender change’ secret from mom, and mom might not have known about it at all, but for the guilty conscience of a teacher.” (link)    I publish the article by Schrier just as she published it, with the links she provided to subscribe to her website in the middle of the article.—RM    ***    Here is Abigail Shrier’s essay:        Should Public Schools be Allowed to Deceive Parents?    No, and we need legislation to stop them.    By Abigail Shrier    Never encourage a child to keep a secret from her parents. That’s what we used to say, in decades past, when we believed a sacred boundary encircled every American home.    Last week, I spoke with another mother who discovered her 12-year-old daughter’s middle school had changed the girl’s name and gender identity at school. The “Gender Support Plan” the district followed is an increasingly standard document which informs teachers of a child’s new chosen name and gender identity (“trans,” “agender,” “non-binary,” etc.) for all internal communications with the child. The school also provided the girl a year’s worth of counseling in support of her new identity, which in her case was “no gender.” Even the P.E. teachers were in on it. Left in the dark were her parents.    This duplicity is part of the “plan”: All documents sent home to mom and dad scrupulously maintained the daughter’s birth name and sex. But Mom noticed her daughter seemed to be suffering. Although far from alone in declaring a new identity – many girls in the school had adopted new names and gender pronouns – this girl’s grades fell apart. She became taciturn and moody.    When the mother failed to uncover the source of the girl’s distress, she met with teachers, hoping for insight. Instead, she slammed into a Wall of Silence: no teacher was evidently willing to let a worried mom know what the hell was going on. (Finally, one did.)Subscribe now    When I wrote Irreversible Damage, I documented that California and other public school systems had adopted a policy of creating two sets of documents around minor students’ gender. Similar policies have cropped up across the country, modeled on the one created by the activist organization Gender Spectrum.    A “gender support plan” isn’t merely a secret held between child and teacher, which might be bad enough. This is no private student confession, the silent whisperings of a troubled teenage heart. A Gender Support Plan, or any similar scheme, effects a schoolwide conspiracy to create a secret name and gender identity specifically withheld from parents. I’ve talked to a mom whose middle school daughter slept in the boys’ bunk on the school overnight before she learned her daughter’s school had, for more than a year, called her by a different name and openly referred to her as a boy.    Teachers and activists who support this policy typically make two arguments in its favor. The first is that the very fact that a teen would want to keep her new gender identity a secret from parents is proof that home is an “unsafe” place for her; that is, her parents, if they knew, would abuse her. The second is that this gender declaration is a deeply held and personal decision of the child’s. The school, in this scenario, is merely a polite bystander—at most, a kindly chaperone. It’s not the school’s job to ask mom and dad for their approval.    The first is absurd; the second, dishonest. Why would a teen agree to keep a secret from her parents, if not for the presence of abuse? Well, as one sharp Twitter user pointed out in response to the documents I posted, one can think of a few things a teen might want to keep secret from mom: an eating disorder; her decision to join a religious cult; her dabbling in drugs; a decision to send or post nudes; or have sex with a much older boy. Teens tend to keep from mom and dad a wide variety of healthy and unhealthy teenage experimentations—sometimes to avoid parental protest; sometimes, just for the pubertal frisson.    And in virtually none of these cases is the primary motivation to keep secrets from parents necessarily fear of abuse. Sometimes it’s to avoid—groan—another lecture or even a conversation. Other times, teens keep something a secret just to avoid a “No.”    Which, in fact, is what the schools seem to want to avoid as well. The non-stop sex-and-gender celebration that begins in many public-school Kindergartens is an attempt to liberate children from any traces of sexual innocence.Share The Truth Fairy    Take for example, The 57 Bus: A True Story of Two Teenagers and The Crime that Changed Their Lives – required reading in middle school English classes in the Dublin Unified school district of California. This Stonewall Book Award Winner is chock full of rather questionable educational material: [Editorial note: offensive text with graphic sexual and swear words deleted…], teen transgender epiphanies, and suicide fantasies—one might think it had been written by an eighth grader rather than pressed on them by the adults running the school.    Lest a child miss the Gender Ideology amid the sad attempt at prose, the author provides a glossary—not for words an eighth grader might not know, but for conceptual building blocks of a world it hopes to summon into existence: “asexual,” “gender fluid,” “gender questioning,” and, of course “transgender.” (Imagine thinking there was a single teenager left in America who needed that one defined.)    To take just one scene from the book, “Watching [the YouTube video], Samantha felt something chime inside her—a bell vibrating in resonance. Before puberty, her physical body didn’t seem to have that much to do with who she was. . . . But now, being a girl was like being stuffed into a heavy, constricting costume.” And then: “I think I might be . . . transgender?” Quelle surprise. [“What a surprise.”]    Very often, parents lack the time and, frankly, the dark imagination necessary to uncover what their children are being taught. When parents object to a teacher or principal, they are frequently met with, at best, polite confusion. What’s the problem? We’re a “safe space” here. Parents get nowhere.    A peculiar power imbalance has arisen between public school teachers and the parents for whom the necessity of work renders them too dependent on these schools to question them. Parents discover radical materials pushed on their children by accident, like passersby happening on a crime scene. They are treated as interlopers, trespassers; they are made to understand they have no right to be there; information on the ideology pushed on their kids is revealed on a strictly need-to-know basis. When parents do object to classroom gender ideology, they’re treated as morally obtuse or child abusers.    The contempt shown parents would be inexcusable even if teachers stuck to reading, writing and arithmetic. In a time when so many public school teachers are properly described as activists, that arrangement strips children of their families’ protection. And families must indeed protect them from an ideology that would turn students against any adult who suggests that a seventh grader suddenly jonesing for hormones and surgeries slow down. I have more than once wondered whether public schools that would openly pit students against their families, turn them against themselves and each other, aren’t doing more harm than good.    I mean no disrespect to teachers when I point out the obvious: the moment a middle-schooler whom they’ve encouraged to transition graduates to high school, they more or less wash their hands of him. Soon after the janitors have stripped the lockers clean and rolled fresh paint on the walls, teachers will mentally and emotionally prepare for the next crop of students. They may remember a few fondly—but that does little for a child they’ve set on a medically perilous path toward a dramatic identity swap. If it backfires – as it will in so many instances – it won’t be the seventh-grade music teacher who contends for years with the damage.    All of which might make you wonder, how on earth are schools getting away with this? Is there no law that bars public schools from concealing a “coming out” to parents? Actually, there really isn’t—not a good enough federal law, anyway.Subscribe now    The Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) grants parents various rights with respect to their children’s education records. But as former Department of Education lawyer, Candice Jackson, explained to me, schools easily skirt this law.    [I]f a record isn’t kept in a centralized location then it doesn’t need to be considered an ‘education record’ legally. So that’s just one example of how schools have noted, ‘Yes, FERPA could be a problem for keeping stuff from parents, so let’s make sure that documentation and forms that are filled out around gender aren’t kept in the central location where the school keeps records.’    For the past year, parents have been placed in the absurd situation of playing Whack-a-Mole with the worst excesses of Woke ideology. A book here, a curriculum there. It’s exhausting—and it’s a losing game of endless defense. Time for offense.    This is where the most critical cultural battle will be fought. Not with reckless doctors, for whom lawsuits are coming. Not even with the therapists—in many cases, a luxury, parents can walk away from. It will be fought with America’s activist teachers. Will we allow the activists among them unaccountable access to the next generation of America’s children?    If conservatives and liberals hope to save this country, this is where they will place their energies: campaigning for federal legislation to grant parents full access to all curricula. And no, granting parents’ review over sex-education materials alone wouldn’t solve this problem, since the SOGI (Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity) curriculum, for instance, is often inserted into other areas of the curriculum or disguised as “anti-bullying” education. We need legislation that grants parents a right to opt out of any instruction regarding gender and sexuality and stops schools from changing a child’s name, gender marker, or pronouns without the approval of a parent or legal guardian. This has nothing to do with “outing” students and everything to do with whether a school should be permitted to hoodwink the primary locus of love and responsibility in her life.    For Pete’s sake, the state requires that teachers ask parental consent before they offer a child Tylenol. Maybe the state should require schools ask parents before inculcating a whole new identity for their child. Indeed, federal law should insist upon it.    Funny thing about this “debate” over parental rights: it cuts clear across party lines. Republican, Democrat, gay, straight—the Mama Bears of America have a very particular idea of what sorts of identities we’ll allow other adults to push on our minor children. Those insisting that teachers must “protect” seventh graders from their parents—they are rarely parents themselves. What they demand is continued unmonitored access to your children. It’s past time we stopped giving it to them.    [End, Schrier essay]    ***    What is the Catholic position on transgenderism?    Here is an answer by Tom Nash on the Catholic Answers website:    Question:    What are Catholic views on Transgenderism/being transgender?    Answer:    Those who espouse “transgenderism” argue that a human person is assigned their gender at birth, based on their observed anatomy. Consequently, when a biological male identifies as female and then has related surgery, they speak of that medical practice as “gender confirmation” vs. “gender reassignment,” because they believe their anatomy now reflects their true identity as a human person.    The Church has a different take, one that is grounded in genuinely confirmed reality. One is born either or male or female, and this also applies to hermaphrodites who, though they manifest both male and female anatomical aspects at birth, are either biological boys or girls.    In this light, the Church recognizes that every human person is created in the image and likeness of God, male or female (Gen. 1:26-27). And so we should help people discover their true identities as children of God, not support them in the disordered attempt to reject their undeniable biological identity.    (…)    For more on this issue, see Trent Horn’s articles here and here, Karlo Broussard’s here, and Cy Kellet’s interview with Dr. Ryan Anderson here.    [End, Tom Nash answer]

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

CHICAGO’S CARDINAL CUPICH (CO-CONSPIRATOR OF JORGE BERGOLIO) IS COMPLETELY INCAPABLE OF COMPUTING THE COST TO HIS CATHOLIC CONGREGATION OF HIS CANCELLATION OF THE PRAYERS AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE CELEBRATION OF EVERY SUNDAY MASS

Print allIn new windowThe “Hail Mary” prayer will not be heard inside or outside of my Son’s ChurchInboxGlen & Renee Szablewski9:58 AM (7 minutes ago)to (Telmab7@gmail.com)  Cardinal Cupich Bans Hail Mary and St Michael Prayer after Mass Cardinal Cupich has banned the Hail Mary and St Michael Prayer after MassNo Catholic bishop would ban a prayer of protection against Satan or the Angelic Salutation.But then Cupich is no Catholic bishopWho but a devil would ban these prayers,   a friend (27) Cardinal Cupich Bans Hail Mary and St Michael Prayer after Mass – YouTube
Cardinal Cupich Bans Hail Mary and St Michael Prayer after Mass  NOW LOOK AT THIS MESSAGE GIVEN IN 2014,see below




Mother of Salvation: Soon, the “Hail Mary” prayer will not be heard inside or outside of my Son’s Church February 12 2014
MaryqueenMy child, just as my Son’s Image, His Word and His Promise to come again will be ignored and then eradicated, so also will every reference to me, your beloved Mother be. Soon, the “Hail Mary” prayer will not be heard inside or outside of my Son’s Church. Much disapproval will be shown to those who visit my holy Shrines and Marian groups will be criticised for many reasons, all without cause. Any admission regarding the authenticity of apparitions involving me, the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God, will not be heard. All references to me will soon be frowned upon by a newly revamped shell of my Son’s Church on Earth. Devotions to me will be stopped in many churches, under the newly appointed regime to be introduced in the future. I will be forgotten about and then despised, by those who will claim to represent a new modern, all-inclusive church, which will bear little resemblance to the Church created upon the Rock, by my Son’s beloved apostle Peter. When you see all devotions to me, the Holy Mother of God, dealt with in this way please be aware that these new rules will be at the behest of the evil one. The evil one despises me, just as much as he is frightened by me. He knows that devotion to me, by souls, keeps his evil ways at bay and that the recital of my Most Holy Rosary scourges him and renders him powerless. Those days ahead will have to be faced by those who love me and there will come a time when the Church’s association with my Shrines will be cut off. When that happens, you will know that this will be to separate God’s children from my influence, which in those times will be necessary, if I am to help you draw towards my Son.My role is to prepare you for the Great Day of my Son’s Second Coming. I intend to continue to call out to my children, until that Day arrives. I only desire to bring souls before my Son, so that He can give them Eternal Salvation. It is all about the salvation of souls, but every effort will be made by the evil one to prevent this from happening.Your beloved MotherMother of Salvation
 
Attachments areaPreview YouTube video Cardinal Cupich Bans Hail Mary and St Michael Prayer after MassCardinal Cupich Bans Hail Mary and St Michael Prayer after Mass
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CHICAGO’S CARDINAL CUPICH (CO-CONSPIRATOR OF JORGE BERGOLIO) IS COMPLETELY INCAPABLE OF COMPUTING THE COST TO HIS CATHOLIC CONGREGATION OF HIS CANCELLATION OF THE PRAYERS AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE CELEBRATION OF EVERY SUNDAY MASS

“But first comes the time of great destruction, when even the angels weep”


Guardian Angel

August 28, 2021

“It is the gift of angels to bring hope to the world –

To soothe a troubled brow,

To clear a treacherous path,

To calm a stormy day,

So that the face of God shines through. 

Angels mend and put back together

What man breaks.

But what a time of sorrow,

Even for angels,

When a broken world refuses to be mended,

And demons find welcome

While angels are shunned.  

It is the gift of angels to bring hope to the world –

For their wings are tinged with mercy,

And their countenance is bathed in love.

Oh, but it is a time of sorrow,

When the archangels gather,

And other angels are told to “Stand down,”

For archangels’ wings are tinged with justice,

And their countenance is bathed in fire. 

What sorrow now falls upon the world,

And even angels weep,

For angels of mercy with healing in their hands,

Have folded their wings and have been called aside,

For this is the time of the archangels,

This is the time of fire.

Oh but archangels also have healing in their wings,

But first comes the time of the great destruction,

When even angels weep.”

-S

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “But first comes the time of great destruction, when even the angels weep”

CARDINAL BLASE CUPICH WILL REGRET TAKING ON SAINT MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL, ANYONE ONE WANT TO PLACE A BET

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

SEARCH

Francis & his Top US Collaborator “Evil… Cupich” vs. Pope Leo XIII’s Exorcism “St. Michael Prayer… at the End of Mass” to Fight Satan?

Pope Leo XIII and the Prayer to St. Michael: Kevin J. Symonds, Justin  Eldracher, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Kent Garrett and Andy Schmalen:  9780984013968: Amazon.com: Books

Yesterday, we found out that Francis’s top US collaborator Cardinal Blase [“More evil from”] Cupichbanned the “St. Michael Prayer… at the end of Mass”:𝑂𝐺@OGamericana More evil from Cupich. Report is that he is forbidding the priests saying the St. Michael Prayer and the Hail Mary at the end of Mass. Illinois faithful, say it even more! [https://twitter.com/OGamericana/status/1431012259271266305]
Francis and Cupich also apparently want to eventually ban the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). Why?

Might one reason be because Pope Leo XIII ordered this exorcism prayer be said at the conclusion of Mass in 1886, but Pope Paul VI issued the Novus Ordo Mass in 1968 and suppressed the TLM and St. Michael prayer which was liberated by Pope Benedict XVI to fight against Satan until Francis’s recent attack against it.

Aleteia reported the reason Pope Leo issued the exorcism was to protect the Church from “demonic spirits, who were gathering on the Eternal City (Rome)”:

According to Kevin Symonds, author ofPope Leo XIII and the Prayer to St. Michael, the vision likely occurred between 1884 and 1886 and took place during the celebration of Mass. Several different reports relate that Pope Leo had a visible change come over his face during the vision and one claims that his face was “pale and fearful.”

A cardinal at the time who knew the pope’s private secretary explains that “Pope Leo XIII truly had a vision of demonic spirits, who were gathering on the Eternal City (Rome). From that experience … comes the prayer which he wanted the whole Church to recite.”

[… ]

Whatever happened during Pope Leo’s vision, it appears certain that he did have a vision and what he saw was not pleasant. It prompted him to quickly compose the Prayer to St. Michael, and to request its use at the end of Low Masses…. he believed prayer was needed to dispel the darkness that hung over the world. [https://aleteia.org/2017/09/25/the-demonic-vision-that-inspired-the-st-michael-prayer/]

Might Cupich’s banning the exorcism prayer point to a reason that Francis and he appear to dislike the Traditional Latin Mass?

Last century, the Catholic Herald summarized why Francis and Cupich may dislike the Pope Leo prayer against Satan which Leo believed “was needed to dispel the darkness that hung over the world”:

For the greater part of this century, the faithful recited the prayer to St. Michael at the end of the Mass. Pope Leo XIII (d. 1903) had a prophetic vision of the coming century of sorrow and war. After celebrating Mass, the Holy Father was conferring with his cardinals. Suddenly, he fell to the floor. The cardinals immediately called for a doctor. No pulse was detected, and the Holy Father was feared dead. Just as suddenly, Pope Leo awoke and said, “What a horrible picture I was permitted to see!” In this vision, God gave Satan the choice of one century in which to do his worst work against the Church. The devil chose the twentieth century. So moved was the Holy Father from this vision that he composed the prayer to St. Michael the Archangel: “St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle! Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, and do thou, O Prince of the heavenly host, by the power of God, thrust into Hell Satan and all the other evil spirits who roam about the world seeking the ruin of souls.” [http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:isO_9ADuW1QJ:www.catholicherald.com/saunders/99ws/ws990916.htm+Tridentine+Mass+exorcism+pope+leo&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&ie=UTF-8] 

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1 – A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020: 
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1 What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”: 
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1
Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it. SHARE

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

THE DISASTER THAT IS OUR EXIT FROM AFGHANISTAN IS THE CREATION OF ONE MAN: JOSEPH BIDEN

Joe Biden IS the ‘Red Flag’

The problem was not Biden’s plan,

 it was, and remains, the man.

By: Mark Alexander

The Patriot Post

August 26, 2021

“It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great Nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a People always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence.” —George Washington (1796)

On the eve of the 20th observance of the 9/11 Islamist attack on our nation, Joe Biden has re-seeded al-Qa’ida’s terrorist turf — the result of his compressed Afghanistan exit schedule. That schedule was motivated by his desire to take a political victory lap ahead of the 20th observance.

What he and his inept foreign policy team have created is a humanitarian catastrophe — there will be no victory lap. Instead, there will be years of leaked videos revealing unmitigated Taliban violence against the men, women, and children Biden and his handlers have abandoned.

All the Leftmedia “analysis” of Biden’s badly failed exfil strategy is now, and will continue to be, in the form of questions about who missed what, who knew what when, and what we coulda/shoulda done — a feast of finger-pointing and blame-shifting ad nauseam. After all, those commercial news outlets, including conservative ones, have to churn news to make their ad revenue targets.

To that end, a sample of the most recent headlines: “Miscue After Miscue, U.S. Exit Plan Unravels ” (The New York Times); “ Trump & Co. engineered the pullout from Afghanistan (The Washington Post); “Afghanistan disaster puts intelligence under scrutiny  (The Hill); “The Only Way Back To Deterrence Is Firing Biden’s Entire National Security Team” (The Federalist); “Here’s What Went Wrong In Afghanistan — And What We Should Have Done Differently” (Daily Wire); and “Afghanistan blame game intensifies as White House, Pentagon and intel point fingers” (Fox News).

All of these headlines are important to the extent that they’re attempting to answer legitimate questions honestly and accurately. Of course, that will be a heavy lift for Biden’s fawning Leftmedia propagandists, but even some of his far-left defenders like CNN have had no choice but to ask some tough questions, given the precipitous drop in Biden’s public support.

As Rich Lowry concludes: “On Afghanistan, Joe Biden in effect set out to test how much shameless incompetence and dishonesty the media would accept. The answer? Not nearly enough. The press is blatantly biased and has become even more so over time, repeatedly propagating false narratives that have shredded its credibility. Still, there are limits beyond which even it can’t be pushed.”

But in the mainstream media’s search for tactical mistakes, as they parse Biden’s every word for lies, they all miss the most critical strategic reason for the national security crisis now unfolding in Afghanistan.

What would that be?

Consider this investigative entry from a CBS analyst: “Afghanistan’s Taliban takeover was predictable. How did Biden miss the red flags?”

How did Biden miss the red flags?

The author, Jeff McCausland, a learned and respected national security analyst, details all the mistakes, miscues, overestimates, and underestimates. And he does so from a far more informed perspective than the media analysts now churning the same question.

But McCausland, like all those aforementioned media analysts and politicos endeavoring to exposit who/what failed, does not make clear the overarching reason for the meltdown of Biden’s exit plan.

The missed “red flags” are, first and foremost, not about failed strategy, or about who missed what, or about execution, or about intelligence failures. The assertion that the CIA, DIA, and NSA “missed” this surge is either absurd or mortifying.

Bottom line: Joe Biden IS “red flag.”

Allow me to reiterate: The problem was not Biden’s plan; it was, and remains, the man. The Taliban had no fear of Joe Biden, which is why they seized Afghanistan in just days after he abandoned our Afghan army allies. And the Taliban’s actions have confirmed that the world’s tyrants need have no fear of Biden.

Biden declared the crisis would have occurred, “if we’d started a month ago, or a month from now,” adding, “There is no way to evacuate this many people without pain and loss of heartbreaking images you see on television.”

There is no way if you are Joe Biden…

The consequences of animatronic Biden’s now-obvious failure as commander-in-chief have immediate and dire implications for our national security that extend far beyond the borders of Afghanistan. China, Russia, and Iran are now greatly emboldened. Power does not tolerate a vacuum.

Biden has repeatedly and boldly lied about the circumstances of his policy failures. Recall just a month ago Biden declared: “The likelihood there’s going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely…the mission hasn’t failed – yet.”

“Yet.”

And Biden has lied about the impact on our NATO partners and their direct criticism of his failed policies. And his lying senior military and foreign policy managers have devalued any trust credit they had.

As former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo observed: “The disaster unfolding in Afghanistan has shown in stark terms the incompetence and weakness of the Biden administration. In a matter of days, the Taliban was allowed to take over the entire country. This feckless, poorly executed withdrawal is already calling into question American leadership from some of our closest allies, such as Germany and the United Kingdom and worse, emboldening our enemies. … Biden’s incompetence has left Americans in harm’s way and is dishonoring those who serve and our country.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said: “I think Joe Biden deserves to be impeached because he’s abandoned thousands of Afghans who fought with us and he’s going to abandon some American citizens because he capitulated to the Taliban.” Of course, had something like this happened on Trump’s watch, Demos would have had impeachment papers drawn before breakfast.

Of course, Biden’s yes-men continue to cover for him.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken, when asked by Chris Wallace, “Does the president not know what’s going on?” responded, “This is an incredibly emotional time for many of us.” Wallace pressed Blinken, and he responded again, “This is a powerfully emotional time for a lot of allies and partners as it is for me, as it is for us.”

Who will believe him now?

Recall that last week, when Biden was asked about the chaos he’s created, he declared there was no way out without chaos.

In fact, that is true, but because there was no way out without chaos under his leadership. Again, Joe Biden IS the “red flag.” His non compos mentis ineptitude is limitless.

Are we to believe that Biden couldn’t commit sufficient forces to pull off the Afghanistan exit without a catastrophic collapse of the nation, but in January, as a theatrical prop for the “insurrection inquisition” he cooked up with Nancy Pelosi, Biden was able to muster more than 25,000 military personnel to DC for weeks and house them in garages?

Wonder what Afghanistan would look like right now if Biden had deployed 25,000 troops to strategic locations in that nation in order to ensure the safe exit of American and allied civilians, and to ensure that BILLIONS of dollars of our best military equipment did not fall into the Taliban’s arsenal?

As for the consequences of Biden’s failure within our borders: The Taliban has, and will again, provide the platform for al-Qa’ida’s terrorists to launch their assaults on the U.S. And they won’t be flying in…

Biden, defied the Rule of Law, has effectively and deliberately dissolving our southern border, which is now an open floodgate for more than 1.2 MILLION illegal entrants – that we have at least counted. Among those not surrendering to immigration agents, are dangerous gang members, sex traffickers and now terrorists — and Biden has no plan to stop the infiltration of those terrorists.

Remember when he was asked about how many immigrants we should bring in, candidate Biden insisted, “We could afford to take in a heartbeat another two million people.” He met half that in his first six months — at least those are the southern border crossers his administration counted.

Brace yourself, America.

So, what is next in Afghanistan?

In his most recent brief press conference on the crisis, Biden opened by applauding passage of Pelosi’s spending boondoggle and progress on his climate agenda. Only then did he announced that he caved to the Taliban’s demands, insisting that he won’t alter his 31 August deadline for the final flight out for American forces – whether or not American civilians can be evacuated in that time. The troop departure has now resumed. And yet days ago he declared, “If there’s American citizens left, we’re going to stay until we get them all out.” He then refused any press questions.

Of Biden’s comments, former Director of National Intelligence Ric Grenell observed: “The White House can’t feel the moment. They aren’t in reality. It’s all a white paper to them. Biden talking about infrastructure and climate change while Americans are trapped.” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) added, “Joe Biden is more dedicated to evacuating himself from his own press conferences than evacuating stranded Americans from behind enemy lines!”

Even House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) says, “Given the number of Americans who still need to be evacuated, the number of SIVs, the number of others who are members of the Afghan press, civil society leaders, women leaders, it’s hard for me to imagine all of that can be accomplished between now and the end of the month.”

As former National Security Adviser Gen. H. R. McMaster reiterated: “We’re gonna leave Americans behind. We’re creating a hostage crisis. We’re creating maybe even potential for losses greater than 9/11 on our way out. And nobody’s talking about that… Sadly, I think we lack the will to do what’s necessary to get our own citizens out.”

But the Taliban thugs put Biden on notice, declaring: “It’s a red line. President Biden announced that on August 31 they would withdraw all their military forces. So, if they extend it that means they are extending occupation. … If the U.S. or U.K. were to seek additional time to continue evacuations — the answer is no. Or there would be consequences. … If they are intent on continuing the occupation it will provoke a reaction.” And Biden tucked tail…

And just to further establish Biden’s foreign policy impotence, the Taliban say they are now going to block Afghans from reaching the safety of the airport.

Biden is still trying to “negotiate with the Taliban.” He’s endeavoring to at least look presidential by asking his military leaders for “contingency plans” to remain beyond the Taliban deadline.

Americans and expats stranded in the chaos have issued strong condemnation for Biden, one screaming, “Go to hell Biden!” Apparently, they did not get the message from Biden’s Press Secretary Jen Psaki: “I think it’s irresponsible to say Americans are stranded. They are not.”

Americans stranded in our Kabul embassy have also expressed strong condemnation of Biden’s failed exfil, one writing, “Happy to die here, but with dignity and pride,” rather than depart betraying our friends.

BTW, who gets fired for the colossal strategic error of abandoning Bagram Air Base — all our assets and all the Taliban and al-Qa’ida prisoners there — before American civilians were safely out? Or was retreat from Bagram another indication that Biden lied about how fast the Taliban would takeover, mocking Iwo Jima Marines along the way? SecDef Lloyd Austin and CJCS Mark Milley won’t take responsibility.

And on the subject of departure, a tactical question: Exactly how do those last massive transport planes full of American troops safely depart Kabul without a defended airport perimeter?

Air breaks in contact with the enemy are very difficult. Recall in Vietnam the helicopters shot down attempting final exfil from an LZ with enemy close. Recall in Afghanistan, the deadliest day in SEAL Team Six history, 06 August 2011, when the Taliban in the Tangi Valley shot down a departing Chinook transport helicopter, killing all 38 service personnel on board – and among the 30 American warriors, 15 SEALS from Team Six’s Gold Squadron.

Yes, we utilize defensive departure corridor patterns, and may deploy significant air support for cover, perhaps including A-10s for close cover, but our lumbering transport aircraft are now at significant risk from the weapons Biden left the Taliban. But positioning American resources to prevent a small-arms fire or a man-portable missile launch would mean abandoning those personnel in a zone completely overrun with the enemy.

And the Taliban has no fear that Biden would obliterate Kabul in retaliation for attacking departing transports – Biden knowing that the next week the whole world would be viewing images of dead and dying women and children as a result.

Yes, as I wrote last week, the prospects of a hostage situation or attacks on departing aircraft are reduced by the fact that the Taliban wants us gone – but the Taliban does not control all the

Veterans who have departed hostile regions by air, know that combat aircraft departures depend on a lot of runway for airspeed to achieve a very high angle of climb to get above enemy fire at the end of a runway…but that presumes a secure airfield.

I suppose this means in addition to air cover, one of the last planes into Kabul will be loaded with large denomination American currency to pay the Taliban to maintain that perimeter.

Amid this crisis, Kamala Harris, who fully backed Biden’s Afghan debacle, managed her successful Beltway evacuation for a visit to Vietnam. On arrival, she posed smiling in front of a Ho Chi Minh statue.

The irony, given Kabul’s parallels with the fall of Saigon, is just too rich for words. I suspect when originally planned, this visit was also part of Biden’s “victory lap” for pulling our military out of Kabul, errantly believing then, it would be very different than pulling our military out of Saigon.

And instead of Russian aid pouring into Vietnam, with the Afghan economy now on the edge of collapse, it’s the Red Chinese stepping into the gap with lots of cash – and they will have no resistance from Biden and his ChiCom appeasers.

Where does that leave Americans here at this moment?

The immediate concern is evacuation of as many Americans and Afghan allies as possible before Biden’s acquiescent timeline.

The intermediate concern is the consequences for tens of thousands of allied Afghan warriors and civilians, and their families, who Biden abandoned. As the Taliban firms up its organizational structure and returns to its extremist tyrannical control, the purges will be underway.

The extended concerns are that Biden has reseeded al-Qa’ida’s turf, and how Biden’s cowardly Afghan retreat will embolden far more powerful tyrants in Iran, Russia and China.

Let’s all lift up in prayer the hundreds of thousands of Afghans, and their families, who embraced our affirmation of Liberty. Many of them are now being systematically targeted for having collaborated with the nation whose inept president ordered them abandoned as evil swept over them — evil that rose because it knew it had nothing to fear from this president. We are also praying for those American service personnel, and their families, who have sacrificed so much to contain that evil prior to this disgraceful retreat.

While the focus now is on getting Americans out, the focus will soon turn to the disaster Biden left behind.

Finally, anyone — ANYONE — who believes that the rise of the Taliban would have occurred under a second Donald Trump term is so deeply deluded with Trump Derangement Syndrome that they are now in total denial. The blood of thousands of those being readied for slaughter is on the hands of every reckless Biden/Harris voter.

_____________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on THE DISASTER THAT IS OUR EXIT FROM AFGHANISTAN IS THE CREATION OF ONE MAN: JOSEPH BIDEN

INCREASLINGLY, WITH THE PASSAGE OF ANOTHER GIVE-AWAY RELIEF BILL BY THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS, THE INCENTIVE FOR AMERICAN WORKERS TO WORK IS DIMINISHED

Does America Still Work?

Until our officials can ensure a humane and sustainable standard of living, we have no business lecturing others abroad, much less conducting endless witch hunts of our own at home.

By Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

August 25, 2021

For nearly two years, Americans have engaged in a great woke experiment of cannibalizing themselves. American civilization has invested massive labor, capital, and time in an effort constantly to flagellate itself for not being perfect.  

Yet neither America’s resilience nor its resources are infinite. We are now beginning to see the consequences of what happens when premodern tribalism absorbs Americans.

There are concrete consequences when ideology governs policy or when we take for granted the basics of life to pursue its trappings.

Who cares whether the blow-dried media is woke if it cannot report the truth and keep politicians honest?

Once journalists became progressive poodles rather than the watchdogs of government, the Biden Administration had no fear of audit. It took for granted that its disasters from the southern border to the chaos in Afghanistan would be excused by toady reporters.  

Government-engineered “equity” has replaced the goal of equal opportunity. But such utopianism birthed popular anger when personal initiative, excellence, and performance do not count as much as virtue-signaling groupthink. 

The United States just suffered a terrible and shameful defeat in Afghanistan. The catastrophe reminds us that the Biden Administration weaponized its politicized military and bureaucracy mostly to fixate on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and to root out supposed internal American enemies. 

So, our top brass and functionaries talked of redirecting the military to every possible woke agenda—except ensuring military superiority and the safety of the United States. 

The result is the horrific mess of a premodern Taliban army routing the most sophisticated military in the history of civilization. We shudder when America begs premodern tribes, please not to murder our citizens whom we abandoned in full retreat.

Our airline CEOs vie to virtue signal their wokeness by damning voter ID laws—though such identification is required to board their own airplanes. As corporations preen to the media, their jet airliners lately don’t have enough fuel to reach their destinations. The new American airline normal is woke delays, woke cancellations, and woke anarchy in the skies. 

Universities now subject their admissions, their hiring, and their very research to race and gender directives. There is less concern for the collective student debt of $1.7 trillion. College students may graduate woke, but they do so with far less impressive reading and writing skills than their less politically correct predecessors a half-century ago.  

Are college administrators really so virtuous when they boast of improving diversity, equity, and inclusion? Why then do they ignore indebted and poorly educated graduates—veritable serfs who cannot afford homes, put off raising families, and prolong their adolescence rather than becoming autonomous citizens?

We know from centuries past what policies ensure public safety and which guarantee crime. All laws must be enforced equally. Yet now suicidal critical race and legal theories govern which laws are enforced and which are ignored. 

If a state attorney prosecutes crimes—or chooses not to prosecute them—on the basis of ideology and race rather than on questions of impartial law, then who would obey, much less honor any of them?  

The police must not just be monitored, but respected and supported. Today they are defamed and defunded. If those who commit crimes do not expect to be arrested, tried, convicted, and punished, then crime pays. And so, we get more of it. 

Cries to empty the jails and prisons and pull back on police might sound neat on Twitter. But lots of innocent Americans will suffer the deadly consequences of someone else’s virtue signaling. 

Before a country can conduct cancer research, explore outer space, or defeat its enemies thousands of miles away, its citizens must have access to affordable fuel, food, and shelter. 

But ideologues now restrict irrigation water, gasoline supplies, power generation, and timber production. They may seem woke and enlightened to each other. But otherwise, they are indifferent to the exorbitant cost of living, the growing shortages of necessities, and the hundreds of thousands of homeless living amid filth, excrement, and disease on the nation’s urban sidewalks and streets. 

Social media fights, the cancel culture wars between celebrities and elites, the virtue signaling of academics, actors, and activists—all of it means nothing if Americans do not have safe roads, viable travel, affordable gas, food, and housing, and safety in their homes.

Increasingly, they do not have these things. Woke leaders are losing the ability to do the hard and essential work of civilization, largely because they are obsessed with the dispensable. 

We live in a world of cell phones, Skype, and Zoom. But high tech has become a mere veneer pasted over medieval urban streets, Depression-era highways, and Third-World airways. It is more dangerous to walk the nighttime streets of Chicago than it is those of war-torn Kabul or Baghdad. 

Until our officials can ensure a humane and sustainable standard of living, we have no business lecturing others abroad, much less conducting endless witch hunts of our own at home. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on INCREASLINGLY, WITH THE PASSAGE OF ANOTHER GIVE-AWAY RELIEF BILL BY THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS, THE INCENTIVE FOR AMERICAN WORKERS TO WORK IS DIMINISHED