CAN WE HOPE FOR AN EARLY END TO THE RUSSIAN INVASION OF THE UKRAINE


Another Russian Mutiny Begins as Soldiers Slam Generals

By

 Paul Duke

 – 

November 8, 2022

 Facebook Twitter Pinterest

Now nine months into the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we are beginning to see a sudden and surprising maneuver from the Kremlin’s forces, and it could help to reshape the global order of things in the coming months.

After repeated failures and a drop in morale that may have never before been seen on a modern battlefield, Russian troops are again looking to mutiny, this time suggesting that their generals are so ill-prepared that they simply cannot and will not fight for them.

Russian marines have said their ‘incompetent’ generals are treating them as ‘cannon fodder’ after their unit suffered devastating losses, with 300 men reportedly killed or wounded in four days of heavy fighting in eastern Ukraine.

Marines from Russia’s 155th Naval Infantry Brigade wrote a scathing letter to their regional governor, claiming they had lost 300 servicemen in a four-day massacre in Pavlivka thanks to the catastrophic planning of Generals Rustam Muradov and Zurab Akhmedov.

The soldiers claimed Russian commanders were ‘hiding’ the mayhem in the Donetsk region and ‘playing down the number of losses for fear of being held responsible’.

And that’s not all:

Major-General Kirill Kulakov, 53, faced chants of ‘get out of here’, ‘shame on you’, and ‘down with Putin’s regime’ as thousands of mobilised men joined a protest at their training base in the city of Kazan, southwest Russia, on the night before they were due to be sent to the front line.

Soldiers who led the mutiny told superiors they could not fight because they had endured weeks of water shortages and scarce rations – and now they were going to be sent into battle with ‘rusty machine guns from the 1970s’.

This is far from the first time that Russian troops have refused to fight citing military incompetence, but it may very well be one of the most profound examples of such a revolt in recent weeks.

Popular in the Community

AdChoices

Sponsored

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CAN WE HOPE FOR AN EARLY END TO THE RUSSIAN INVASION OF THE UKRAINE

WE CAN ONLY HOPE AND PRAY

November 8, 2022
Special Edition
We Can Only Hope By: Bill SchoettlerNovember 8, 2022 The Right accused the Left, re the 2020 election, accused the Left of manipulating the votes, miscounting, not-counting, under-counting, and in many other ways presenting the people with a President whose vote was the highest ever. And Joe Biden won the election despite that Donald Trump won more votes in the 2020 election than he won in the 2016 election and more votes than any sitting President had ever won in a re-election campaign. When the Right leveled their accusations of voter fraud against the Left the Right mostly was unable to get any court to agree with them. The election was certified and the Right continued to lick its wounds with many continuing to claim the election was stolen.  Now we have the 2022 midterm elections upon us and this time, in advance of even the final day of balloting, both the Right and the Left are already accusing each other of voter manipulation, voter fraud, misinformation and, not to be forgotten…the potential end of democracy. At this point in our country’s history, the claim is being made, by the left, that if the Right wins a majority in the House and Senate “it will be the end of democracy”. “Democracy is on the ballot” we are being told.  Of course, only candidates are on the ballot and each candidate has had multiple opportunities to explain their position on whatever issues they felt needed explanation. The voters have had ample opportunity to look and listen to the candidates, to consider their own lives and how their lives have been affected by the policies of the current administration, to listen to the opinions and read the opinions of editorial writers, newscasters, commentators, and even celebrities. We are told that each voter in every State has had, or will have the opportunity to cast a ballot for candidates of their own choice. The ballots will be counted and the winners announced sometime beginning Tuesday night and into the next few days.  Already there are rumblings that illegal and fraudulent efforts will be utilized to manipulate the vote count, and that some of the candidates will win whose vote count will be false. Some of these complaints are, arguably, coming from individuals who fear their support is less than they had hoped and some complaints are coming from candidates who are trying to urge their supporters to be sure to vote. But some sitting politicians have already claimed that unethical efforts will be made by some to distort the election results and ‘harm democracy” by so doing.  The election results, completely unknown as this is being written (11/7/22), will demonstrate the public’s response to the Democratic administration that has been running the country under the leadership of Joe Biden for the past 2 years. There are pundits on both sides who are claiming the results will condemn and the results will affirm the quality of that leadership.  The election results may be close enough that neither side can claim the sizable victory they would like to see. One side may win a significant victory. One side will feel fully vindicated in their attacks. The real question is whether the American People will benefit from the results of this election.  Somehow I feel that the people have already lost. Democracy is not up for “re-election”. Candidates will be winners or losers. If a candidate wins the popular vote in any election it means the majority of voters of that State wanted that candidate to win. The process is how this country functions…and we call it “democracy”. We have witnessed, from the time of the 2016 election to the very present, a continuing attempt to impeach Donald Trump, to vilify him in every way possible, and to condemn everything he did as President (2017 to 2021). Seldom, if ever has one political party and its supporters spent so much time, money, and effort to attack one human being. And an honest and careful examination of all the published and disclosed evidence urged against this man has been found to lack sufficient evidentiary weight to convict him of any crime. This. Despite multiple “promises” from multiple politicians that “any day now a mountain of incriminating evidence will be revealed” [sufficient] to cast him (Trump) into the fires of hell for eternity.  We have also witnessed the Federal Bureau of Investigation, heretofore one of the nation’s most hallowed institutions, a stalwart force for good and perhaps this country’s greatest bulwark against the forces of evil, now clearly demonstrated to not only have feet of clay but to be riddled with management and supervisors whose duties have become the enforcement of absurd and unreasonable (and in many cases completely unfounded)  charges against some whose most significant transgression has been to disagree (publicly) with the current administration.  We have seen the Center for Disease Control, another beacon of light in the medical field, the protector of the Nation’s health, the promoter of legitimate medicine…turn into a propaganda arm of the Administration and blatantly ignore scientific methods and proclaim silly and ineffectual practices for protection against a series of viruses. And, to add insult to injury, to ignore medical evidence that contradicted their preferred treatment methodology, evidence that even proved to be harmful (to the point of death in many cases), and then attack and condemn those medical practitioners with the courage to contradict the “party line” and prescribe alternative (and genuinely efficacious) alternatives.   Based on a scientifically unsupportable conclusion that the conduct of the world’s economy, led by the United States as a principal contributor to CLIMATE CHANGE, the current and most popular bogeyman described as a genuine and “preventable” threat to the planet, our beloved president on his first day in office canceled the further construction of an oil pipeline and instituted further restrictions and limitations on the production of petroleum and natural gas in the entire country. The argument was that it was necessary to force the country to substitute wind and solar (and other “alternate”)energy sources to generate the vital electric power needed to operate this country.  The inevitable result of this has been the incredible increase in the price of gasoline, the growing realization that [despite] solar and wind-powered electricity is currently adequate to meet the country’s demands for energy. In an embarrassing move, the president turned to many foreign countries begging them to sell us oil (when we currently possess the world’s largest petroleum reserves) to replace what the President had curtailed.  Lest we forget, in a move that was contradicted by every previous President of this country, Joe Biden virtually opened the Southern border of this country to an influx of over 5,000,000 people who crossed illegally that border and entered the country. Every single president who has addressed the issue of illegal immigration has condemned the practice and urged strict border enforcement…except for Biden. There are additional issues that can be addressed, such as gender identity/confusion matters, racial characteristics being recognized as primary factors in employment, college admissions, selection of political office and judicial appointments, the overturning of classical grammatical construction, and the glorification of victimhood. Also the death of humor.  Whatever happens in this election we, the people, can only hope that we will not be forgotten as the two political parties slug it out over whatever issues they deem important. The people want to live their lives with some degree of comfort, with a feeling of security, and with the belief, they can trust the government to function in a reasonable fashion.  We can only hope  If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools.Plato
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WE CAN ONLY HOPE AND PRAY

ALMOST ANYTHING OR ANYONE THE LEFT OPPOSES IS SMEARED AS RACIST OR A RACIST WHEN THE RULES OF DIALOG ARE WRITTEN BY THE LEFT

How the Projectionist Game is Played.

“Racist!”

By: Victor Davis Hanson

November 1, 2022

Almost anything or anyone the Left opposes is smeared as racist or a racist. And the rules are made only by the Left.

The N-word is utterly racist. Yet it continues and obviously gains currency when rappers and comedians use it promiscuously on the assumption that leftists and blacks cannot be racist when using a racist word.

Cultural appropriation is said to be racist. So, blonds who have cornrows in their hair in racist fashion culturally appropriate the black experience.

But MSNBC anchor Joy Reid is not a cultural appropriator when she dies her blond as if she is a Scandinavian Valkyrie? White wannabe rappers are cultural appropriators, but not so black opera singers? Is the rule asymmetry? That those who smear others on racial grounds are exempt from their own racial smears or hypocrisies?

These rules of leftwing racism are so opaque and contradictory that almost everyone falls afoul of them.

It is not racist to demand that Asian students have 450 points higher on standardized tests than blacks to enter Harvard and other Ivy League schools. It is racist to suggest that it is racist to use skin color to so discriminate. It is racist of course to pick the race of your future dorm roommate unless you are non-white and so is he/she.

We are told that the MAGA Republicans are racists. But from whom do such charges emanate? Joe Biden?

Did Biden not fabricate the racist corn pop sagas? Was not he the one who called a senior aide “my boy”? I remember Biden half-praising Obama as the first articulate black presidential candidate. He claimed donut shops were the sole domain of Indian Americans. Did not Biden talk down to black professionals that Mitt Romney would put them back in chains as if an accomplished audience had ever been itself enslaved or would allow that to happen without Joe Biden’s help?

Why did the projectionist Biden libel two black interviewers as “junkie” and “you ain’t black?”

Why did Biden praise his segregationist Senate mentors in a fashion that once lost Trent Lott his Senate majority position for his bizarre praise of the racist and segregationist Strom Thurmond?

There is a current parlor game of simply listening to the frequent charges of racism from those in the race industry and then assuming the charges are proof that they are racists. Kelisa Wing, the Pentagon’s “Chief of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at the Department of Defense Education Activity” and Democratic candidate for Senate in South Carolina, Krystle Matthews, charge racism. But, of course, both can be easily found to have racist rants in their past. Is that why they charge others with what they themselves are guilty?

But then again, before Joy Reid became a racial arbitrator, she too had an entire corpus of past racist and homophobic slurs and smears. She escaped culpability by falsely claiming her electronic messaging was “hacked.”

Unfortunately, the charge of racist has now become synonymous with projectionism. And it falls into three loose categories.

One, there are the Jussie Smollett/Duke lacrosse/volleyball sorts in which race-obsessed figures or their enablers lodge false charges of racism to enhance their own failing race-based careers. As the failing ratings crunch CNN and MSNBC, expect the deposed or demoted to claim “racists”sandbagged them.

Or two, there are the white liberal racists, so often rich and elite, who have a history of racial slurs or discomfort with the non-white, and thus libel other non-racists as racists to ensure their own past is exonerated.

Joe Biden is the best example. But do we remember “progressive” Harry Reid’s assessment of Barack Obama (a “light-skinned” African American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one”) or Bill Clinton’s reported putdown of the same future president (“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”)?

Do we remember progressive Nancy Pelosi’s latest immigrant quip (“Why are you shipping these immigrants up north? We need them to pick the crops down here?”)?Who would dare to suggest a Biden, Reid, Clinton, or Pelosi was a racist?

Or three, we have the self-declared non-whites who are obsessed with race either out of their own apparent sense of inferiority or because, in contrast, they are proud racial chauvinists who say one thing in public as if that empowers them to say its opposite in private.

How about race-baiter Nury Martinez, the LA City Council head who for years bragged that she was a leader in the resistance to Donald Trump’s supposedly racist policies to make immigration legal only?

Do we remember her recently revealed real sentiments that might explain her leftwing frequent charges that others were racists (e.g., “F— that guy, he’s with the Blacks.”/“monkey”/“like a little white kid”/“Let me take him around the corner, I’ll bring him right back”/[of Oaxacans] “I see a lot of little, short dark people…I don’t know where these people are from. I don’t know what village they came [from], how they got here… They’re ugly.”)?

And on and on…

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ALMOST ANYTHING OR ANYONE THE LEFT OPPOSES IS SMEARED AS RACIST OR A RACIST WHEN THE RULES OF DIALOG ARE WRITTEN BY THE LEFT

 If Republicans Win On Tuesday,

Thank The Election Integrity Movement

By: Mollie Hemingway

November 4, 2022

Against a hostile propaganda press, many Americans have poured themselves into restoring election integrity — and it’s working.

If Republican candidates do as well as expected on Tuesday, they can credit the new, widespread, and coordinated effort to begin securing U.S. elections, helping give candidates the best opportunity possible to win a fair fight in the new voting environment of mail-in balloting.

The Republican National Committee, other party entities, and dozens of public interest election nonprofit groups built over the last two years a multimillion-dollar election integrity infrastructure that passed laws improving voter ID and other election security measures defended those laws from legal attacks by Democrats and sued states and localities that failed to follow the law. They also recruited, educated, trained, and placed tens of thousands of new election observers and other workers throughout the long midterm voting season.

And they did it all in one of the most hostile propaganda environments on record.

2020’s Wake-Up Call

The 2020 election was a massive wake-up call for many Americans on the right. In the months leading up to it, Democrats forced through changes to hundreds of laws and processes governing how elections are conducted. 

The rule-change scheme was run by Marc Elias, a Democrat election attorney who also ran his party’s Russia collusion hoax, which falsely claimed Donald Trump stole the 2016 election by colluding with Russia. Sometimes Democrats’ 2020 changes were instituted legally. Frequently, though, they were affected by other means, such as getting a friendly state or local official to change the rules unilaterally.

The 2020 election plan, some of which was admitted to in a flattering Time magazine story, sought to flood the zone with tens of millions of unsupervised mail-in ballots, historically understood to be riper for fraud and other election irregularities than supervised, in-person voting. The plan also involved the private takeover of government election offices to run Democrat-focused get-out-the-vote operations. Mark Zuckerberg, one of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful men, financed the project, doling out $419 million to two left-wing groups that focused grants and assistance to government offices in the Democrat areas of swing states.

This radical change — “practically a revolution in how people vote,” as Time put it — included the widespread practice of placing ballot drop boxes predominantly in Democrat areas of the country, mailing out unsolicited mail-in ballots or applications for mail-in ballots, using well-funded teams of ballot harvesters both inside and outside of government, lowering and changing the standards for mail-in ballot acceptance, and fixing or “curing” ballots that were improperly filled out. 

Corporate media and other Democrats claimed the election was the best run in history. In reality, it was a mess. Big Tech and the media ran coordinated disinformation campaigns to benefit Democrats by suppressing news that hurt the party. Big Tech also deplatformed effective conservative voices and media outlets, suppressed fundraising emails from Republicans, and elevated certain information to help Democrats. 

There were other problems. Candidate debates occurred long after mail-in and early balloting began. Poll observers were sidelined under the guise of a Covid “emergency.” The counting of ballots cast via unsupervised, mail-in voting resulted in curious and confusing results. It took days and sometimes weeks to find out how many ballots were cast, much less for whom. In the end, Americans learned that Joseph Biden, who had spent most of his campaign at home, had become the most popular American president in history, collecting an astounding 81 million votes.

Many Republican voters wondered how things were allowed to get so bad with elections.

Republicans Spent 40 Years on the Sidelines

Part of the reason Republicans hadn’t more effectively fought the election integrity battle before now is somewhat shocking. The 2020 contest was the first presidential election since Ronald Reagan’s first successful run in 1980 in which the Republican National Committee could play any role whatsoever in Election Day operations. For nearly 40 years, the Democratic National Committee had a massive systematic advantage over its Republican counterpart: The RNC had been prohibited by law from helping with poll watcher efforts or nearly any voting-related litigation.

Democrats had accused Republicans of voter intimidation in a 1981 New Jersey gubernatorial race. The case was settled, and the two parties entered into a court-ordered consent decree limiting Republican involvement in any poll-watching operation. But Dickinson Debevoise, the Jimmy Carter-appointed judge who oversaw the agreement, never let them out of it, repeatedly modifying and strengthening it at the Democrats’ request. 

Debevoise was a judge for only 15 years, but he stayed 21 years in senior status, a form of semi-retirement that enables judges to keep serving in a limited capacity. It literally took Debevoise’s dying in 2015 for Republicans to get out of the consent decree. Upon his passing, a new judge, appointed by President Obama, was assigned the case and let the agreement expire at the end of 2018.

The effect of this four-decade hindrance on GOP poll-watching cannot be overstated. Poll watchers serve many functions. They deter voter fraud, but they also help with getting out the vote. Poll watchers can see who has voted, meaning campaigns and political parties can figure out which areas and voters to call and encourage to vote. They also can observe who was forced to vote provisionally or who was turned away at the polls. 

“Without poll watchers, the RNC would have no good way to follow up with its voters to help ensure a provisional ballot is later counted, direct confused voters to their correct polling place and document irregularities, such as voting equipment malfunctions and other incidents that are important flash points in a close election or recount,” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has explained. 

For decades, Democrats built up expansive coordination efforts that the Republicans were prohibited from developing. Republican candidates and state parties could do things on their own, but not with help from the national party. In 2012, the Obama-Biden campaign bragged about recruiting 18,000 lawyers to be poll watchers, providing more than 300 training sessions to ensure the observers understood election law. The volunteers would collect more than 19,000 problematic incidents at polling locations that were resolved with or without legal intervention. 

The consent decree also meant the RNC was kept out of almost any litigation related to Election Day. In fact, one main part of the RNC’s legal efforts was training staff to stay away from Election Day operations, including recounts, and fending off litigation that arose from the consent decree. 

It paralyzed the RNC’s political operations, as the slightest misstep would result in getting sued by Democrats. For example, when former Trump Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in an interview with GQ magazine that he’d watched 2016 returns in an oversized utility room on the fifth floor of Trump Tower, Democrats deposed him to show he’d violated the order by being on the wrong floor, one tied to Election Day outreach. 

The Democrats used that trivial fact to try, unsuccessfully, to get the new judge to extend the limitation on their political rivals for another decade. Even though the decree was finally lifted after nearly 40 years, it didn’t mean Republicans were on even footing with Democrats in 2020. Democrats had spent decades perfecting their Election Day operations and litigation strategy while everyone at the RNC walked on eggshells, knowing that if they so much as looked in the direction of a polling site, there could be another crackdown. 

Thus there was no muscle memory about how to watch polls or communicate with a campaign. They had spent decades not being able to organize or talk to presidential campaigns, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, or the National Republican Congressional Committee about any of these efforts. 

What a change, then, when McDaniel announced in early 2020 her “intention to be the most litigious chair in history.”

But First, Election Reforms

Before mounting successful lawsuits, however, better laws had to be passed — a difficult task in the immediate aftermath of the 2020 election, when Democrats claimed any criticism of how that election had been run was unacceptable and possibly criminal. That campaign, designed to suppress efforts to bolster election security, continues to this day. Nevertheless, Republican lawmakers in dozens of states began pushing for election reforms. 

For example, bans on so-called Zuckbucks, the private takeover of government election offices, were passed and signed into law in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Six Democrat governors vetoed attempted bans, understanding how key Zuckerberg’s funding was to Democrat success in 2020. The governors of Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all vetoed the bans. Wisconsin’s governor, currently in a tight election, vetoed twice. The Kansas legislature overrode the veto.

The resulting contrast between election integrity in some of these battleground states could not be clearer. Take Pennsylvania, for instance, a pivotal swing state where the Democrat governor vetoed the legislature’s attempted reforms. Its partisan Supreme Court meanwhile issues conflicting guidance, resulting in disparate treatment of ballots depending on the county they’re cast in. Elections here are high in irregularities and low in voter trust. 

Not so in Georgia. Recall that despite tremendous pressure from Democrats who alleged massive GOP-led voter suppression, including Biden who smeared election integrity efforts as “Jim Crow 2.0,” Georgia passed much-needed reforms related to voter ID, mail-in voting, and drop boxes, in addition to the Zuckbucks ban. The result has been record-breaking early, in-person voter turnout, across demographics, surpassing 2 million voters this week.

Meanwhile, the Foundation for Government Accountability worked with states to make policy changes to clean voter rolls, ban ballot trafficking, secure ballot custody, roll back Covid waivers, enact penalties for election lawbreakers, require chains of custody, secure drop boxes, pre-process absentee ballots, improve absentee voter ID, and dozens of other types of reforms.

Florida has been working steadily to improve its election system since the disastrous 2000 election. Last year, that meant banning Zuckbucks. This year, those changes included “requiring voter rolls to be annually reviewed and updated, strengthening ID requirements, establishing the Office of Election Crimes and Security to investigate election law violations, and increasing penalties for violations of election laws.”

Incidentally, the Center for Renewing America filed a complaint with the IRS over the tax break that Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan received for their 2020 election meddling. 

Litigate, Litigate, Litigate

While the RNC and the Trump campaign did achieve some legal successes in the lead-up to the 2020 election, it was nowhere near sufficient against the well-funded and coordinated Democrat effort. Republican donors and grassroots demanded more. 

The RNC got involved in 73 election integrity cases in 20 states for the midterms, with plans to expand. They won a lawsuit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson for restricting the rights of poll challengers; got Maricopa County, Arizona, to share key data about its partisan breakdown of poll workers; won an open records lawsuit against Mercer County, New Jersey, for refusing to share election administration data; won a lawsuit against the North Carolina State Board of Elections for restricting the rights of poll watchers; and reached a favorable settlement against Clark County, Nevada, in which the county agreed to share information about its partisan breakdown of poll workers on a rolling basis.

“I’m so grateful the RNC is back in the system after 40 years. They’re so needed,” said Minnesota State Senator and former Minnesota Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer.

Ken Cuccinelli, the former Virginia attorney general and acting deputy DHS secretary who now runs the Election Transparency Initiative agreed. “They’ve been a game changer in the litigation arena to keep elections clean.”

The RNC wasn’t the only big change in the litigation battle. Hotelier Steve Wynn, strategist Karl Rove, former Attorney General Bill Barr, and top Republican election lawyers launched an election litigation group, Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), in July 2022, and within three months chalked up several major victories.

For instance, RITE sued over controversial Wisconsin Elections Commission guidance that conflicted with state law, telling election clerks to accept ballots that had been spoiled, and won the case. It was also part of the group that successfully sued Pennsylvania over whether ballots that failed to be dated, as required by state law, could be counted. 

“It goes to show what responsible and tireless lawyering can do for election integrity,” said Derek Lyons, the president and CEO of RITE.

Groups with lengthier histories of battling for election integrity, such as the Public Interest Legal Foundation, also had successes. A Delaware court ruled that the state’s newly passed mail-in balloting scheme violated its constitution.

Monitoring Polls

U.S. elections used to occur on one day, requiring just one day of poll observations. Now that elections can spread out over days, weeks, or even months, many more workers are needed to monitor the casting of ballots.

The RNC hired 17 in-state election integrity directors and 37 state-based election integrity counsels in key states. They conducted more than 5,000 election integrity training sessions, recruited more than 70,000 poll watchers and workers, and worked with more than 110,000 unique volunteers nationwide. They set up an issue reporting system and distributed copies of Poll Watcher Principles for states. If voters encounter election issues, they can file a report, and attorneys will be dispatched to resolve the issues. Sites were set up in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Congressional Republicans also got in on the action. Rep. Rodney Davis, the top Republican on the House Administration Committee, notified all 50 states that he would be deploying dozens of specially trained election observers to protect the integrity of the ballot box.

The move occurred after Democrats nearly seized a seat won by Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa in 2020. She won her election by just six votes, leading Democrats to attempt to unseat her using parliamentary shenanigans. The Republicans of the House Administration Committee just released a mini-doc about Democrats’ attempt at literal election denialism.

With tens of millions of voters newly concerned about election integrity, other groups also took part in massive training operations. The Election Integrity Network, which started with a podcast on election integrity issues hosted by longtime election lawyer Cleta Mitchell, grew into state summits, which then built out into coalitions in states, attracting people to weekly meetings. The network has trained 76,000 poll workers.

The network’s North Carolina Election Integrity Team covers 95 percent of that state’s priority areas with poll observers. It has more than 30 local task forces, with representatives in 75 of 100 counties. More than 2,000 North Carolinians were individually trained. The group has established a strong working relationship with the state General Assembly to overhaul legislation and built relationships with local election officials. Similar groups are operating in Georgia, Virginia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and other states. 

The Vulnerable Voters Working Group meets to develop and implement ideas to protect nursing homes from left-wing ballot harvesting. The American Constitutional Rights Union is one coalition partner working to protect seniors from illicit activities.

Part of the benefit of an aggressive legal strategy is that it incentivizes election bureaucrats and officials to follow the law, which helps restore trust in elections, Election Integrity Network Director Marshall Yates says. “These people provide transparency and accountability to the system that was previously just run by unaccountable bureaucrats. They may or may not see something but just their presence is a check on making sure there is some accountability to the system, and it should restore confidence in seeing how elections were administered.”

What Remains

While reforms were passed in more than two dozen states, key lawsuits were filed and won, and poll workers are being deployed nationwide, many problems remain. Even with the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court victory, that state remains essentially lawless when it comes to election integrity. North Carolina, Nevada, Wisconsin, and other battleground states retain problematic election processes and guidance. And, inflated voter rolls, combined with unsolicited mail-in ballots, are a recipe for disaster.

The new election integrity groups have much work to do in the years ahead. But many Americans, from establishment Republicans to grassroots conservatives, have poured themselves into restoring integrity to elections nationwide. They have begun to achieve major successes in lobbying for election security, litigating against a well-funded activist opposition, and training poll watchers. And they did it all in the face of a hostile propaganda press that maliciously disparaged them as election deniers.

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

EVEN IF YOU HAVE USUALLY VOTED FOR DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES IN PAST ELECTIONS, DO NOT DO SO TOMORROW FOR THE SAKE OF OUR NATION

 If Republicans Win On Tuesday,

Thank The 

Election Integrity Movement

By: Mollie Hemingway

November 4, 2022

Against a hostile propaganda press, many Americans have poured themselves into restoring election integrity — and it’s working.

If Republican candidates do as well as expected on Tuesday, they can credit the new, widespread, and coordinated effort to begin securing U.S. elections, helping give candidates the best opportunity possible to win a fair fight in the new voting environment of mail-in balloting.

The Republican National Committee, other party entities, and dozens of public interest election nonprofit groups built over the last two years a multimillion-dollar election integrity infrastructure that passed laws improving voter ID and other election security measures defended those laws from legal attacks by Democrats and sued states and localities that failed to follow the law. They also recruited, educated, trained, and placed tens of thousands of new election observers and other workers throughout the long midterm voting season.

And they did it all in one of the most hostile propaganda environments on record.

2020’s Wake-Up Call

The 2020 election was a massive wake-up call for many Americans on the right. In the months leading up to it, Democrats forced through changes to hundreds of laws and processes governing how elections are conducted. 

The rule-change scheme was run by Marc Elias, a Democrat election attorney who also ran his party’s Russia collusion hoax, which falsely claimed Donald Trump stole the 2016 election by colluding with Russia. Sometimes Democrats’ 2020 changes were instituted legally. Frequently, though, they were affected by other means, such as getting a friendly state or local official to change the rules unilaterally.

The 2020 election plan, some of which was admitted to in a flattering Time magazine story, sought to flood the zone with tens of millions of unsupervised mail-in ballots, historically understood to be riper for fraud and other election irregularities than supervised, in-person voting. The plan also involved the private takeover of government election offices to run Democrat-focused get-out-the-vote operations. Mark Zuckerberg, one of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful men, financed the project, doling out $419 million to two left-wing groups that focused grants and assistance to government offices in the Democrat areas of swing states.

This radical change — “practically a revolution in how people vote,” as Time put it — included the widespread practice of placing ballot drop boxes predominantly in Democrat areas of the country, mailing out unsolicited mail-in ballots or applications for mail-in ballots, using well-funded teams of ballot harvesters both inside and outside of government, lowering and changing the standards for mail-in ballot acceptance, and fixing or “curing” ballots that were improperly filled out. 

Corporate media and other Democrats claimed the election was the best run in history. In reality, it was a mess. Big Tech and the media ran coordinated disinformation campaigns to benefit Democrats by suppressing news that hurt the party. Big Tech also deplatformed effective conservative voices and media outlets, suppressed fundraising emails from Republicans, and elevated certain information to help Democrats. 

There were other problems. Candidate debates occurred long after mail-in and early balloting began. Poll observers were sidelined under the guise of a Covid “emergency.” The counting of ballots cast via unsupervised, mail-in voting resulted in curious and confusing results. It took days and sometimes weeks to find out how many ballots were cast, much less for whom. In the end, Americans learned that Joseph Biden, who had spent most of his campaign at home, had become the most popular American president in history, collecting an astounding 81 million votes.

Many Republican voters wondered how things were allowed to get so bad with elections.

Republicans Spent 40 Years on the Sidelines

Part of the reason Republicans hadn’t more effectively fought the election integrity battle before now is somewhat shocking. The 2020 contest was the first presidential election since Ronald Reagan’s first successful run in 1980 in which the Republican National Committee could play any role whatsoever in Election Day operations. For nearly 40 years, the Democratic National Committee had a massive systematic advantage over its Republican counterpart: The RNC had been prohibited by law from helping with poll watcher efforts or nearly any voting-related litigation.

Democrats had accused Republicans of voter intimidation in a 1981 New Jersey gubernatorial race. The case was settled, and the two parties entered into a court-ordered consent decree limiting Republican involvement in any poll-watching operation. But Dickinson Debevoise, the Jimmy Carter-appointed judge who oversaw the agreement, never let them out of it, repeatedly modifying and strengthening it at the Democrats’ request. 

Debevoise was a judge for only 15 years, but he stayed 21 years in senior status, a form of semi-retirement that enables judges to keep serving in a limited capacity. It literally took Debevoise’s dying in 2015 for Republicans to get out of the consent decree. Upon his passing, a new judge, appointed by President Obama, was assigned the case and let the agreement expire at the end of 2018.

The effect of this four-decade hindrance on GOP poll-watching cannot be overstated. Poll watchers serve many functions. They deter voter fraud, but they also help with getting out the vote. Poll watchers can see who has voted, meaning campaigns and political parties can figure out which areas and voters to call and encourage to vote. They also can observe who was forced to vote provisionally or who was turned away at the polls. 

“Without poll watchers, the RNC would have no good way to follow up with its voters to help ensure a provisional ballot is later counted, direct confused voters to their correct polling place and document irregularities, such as voting equipment malfunctions and other incidents that are important flash points in a close election or recount,” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has explained. 

For decades, Democrats built up expansive coordination efforts that the Republicans were prohibited from developing. Republican candidates and state parties could do things on their own, but not with help from the national party. In 2012, the Obama-Biden campaign bragged about recruiting 18,000 lawyers to be poll watchers, providing more than 300 training sessions to ensure the observers understood election law. The volunteers would collect more than 19,000 problematic incidents at polling locations that were resolved with or without legal intervention. 

The consent decree also meant the RNC was kept out of almost any litigation related to Election Day. In fact, one main part of the RNC’s legal efforts was training staff to stay away from Election Day operations, including recounts, and fending off litigation that arose from the consent decree. 

It paralyzed the RNC’s political operations, as the slightest misstep would result in getting sued by Democrats. For example, when former Trump Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in an interview with GQ magazine that he’d watched 2016 returns in an oversized utility room on the fifth floor of Trump Tower, Democrats deposed him to show he’d violated the order by being on the wrong floor, one tied to Election Day outreach. 

The Democrats used that trivial fact to try, unsuccessfully, to get the new judge to extend the limitation on their political rivals for another decade. Even though the decree was finally lifted after nearly 40 years, it didn’t mean Republicans were on even footing with Democrats in 2020. Democrats had spent decades perfecting their Election Day operations and litigation strategy while everyone at the RNC walked on eggshells, knowing that if they so much as looked in the direction of a polling site, there could be another crackdown. 

Thus there was no muscle memory about how to watch polls or communicate with a campaign. They had spent decades not being able to organize or talk to presidential campaigns, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, or the National Republican Congressional Committee about any of these efforts. 

What a change, then, when McDaniel announced in early 2020 her “intention to be the most litigious chair in history.”

But First, Election Reforms

Before mounting successful lawsuits, however, better laws had to be passed — a difficult task in the immediate aftermath of the 2020 election, when Democrats claimed any criticism of how that election had been run was unacceptable and possibly criminal. That campaign, designed to suppress efforts to bolster election security, continues to this day. Nevertheless, Republican lawmakers in dozens of states began pushing for election reforms. 

For example, bans on so-called Zuckbucks, the private takeover of government election offices, were passed and signed into law in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Six Democrat governors vetoed attempted bans, understanding how key Zuckerberg’s funding was to Democrat success in 2020. The governors of Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all vetoed the bans. Wisconsin’s governor, currently in a tight election, vetoed twice. The Kansas legislature overrode the veto.

The resulting contrast between election integrity in some of these battleground states could not be clearer. Take Pennsylvania, for instance, a pivotal swing state where the Democrat governor vetoed the legislature’s attempted reforms. Its partisan Supreme Court meanwhile issues conflicting guidance, resulting in disparate treatment of ballots depending on the county they’re cast in. Elections here are high in irregularities and low in voter trust. 

Not so in Georgia. Recall that despite tremendous pressure from Democrats who alleged massive GOP-led voter suppression, including Biden who smeared election integrity efforts as “Jim Crow 2.0,” Georgia passed much-needed reforms related to voter ID, mail-in voting, and drop boxes, in addition to the Zuckbucks ban. The result has been record-breaking early, in-person voter turnout, across demographics, surpassing 2 million voters this week.

Meanwhile, the Foundation for Government Accountability worked with states to make policy changes to clean voter rolls, ban ballot trafficking, secure ballot custody, roll back Covid waivers, enact penalties for election lawbreakers, require chains of custody, secure drop boxes, pre-process absentee ballots, improve absentee voter ID, and dozens of other types of reforms.

Florida has been working steadily to improve its election system since the disastrous 2000 election. Last year, that meant banning Zuckbucks. This year, those changes included “requiring voter rolls to be annually reviewed and updated, strengthening ID requirements, establishing the Office of Election Crimes and Security to investigate election law violations, and increasing penalties for violations of election laws.”

Incidentally, the Center for Renewing America filed a complaint with the IRS over the tax break that Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan received for their 2020 election meddling. 

Litigate, Litigate, Litigate

While the RNC and the Trump campaign did achieve some legal successes in the lead-up to the 2020 election, it was nowhere near sufficient against the well-funded and coordinated Democrat effort. Republican donors and grassroots demanded more. 

The RNC got involved in 73 election integrity cases in 20 states for the midterms, with plans to expand. They won a lawsuit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson for restricting the rights of poll challengers; got Maricopa County, Arizona, to share key data about its partisan breakdown of poll workers; won an open records lawsuit against Mercer County, New Jersey, for refusing to share election administration data; won a lawsuit against the North Carolina State Board of Elections for restricting the rights of poll watchers; and reached a favorable settlement against Clark County, Nevada, in which the county agreed to share information about its partisan breakdown of poll workers on a rolling basis.

“I’m so grateful the RNC is back in the system after 40 years. They’re so needed,” said Minnesota State Senator and former Minnesota Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer.

Ken Cuccinelli, the former Virginia attorney general and acting deputy DHS secretary who now runs the Election Transparency Initiative agreed. “They’ve been a game changer in the litigation arena to keep elections clean.”

The RNC wasn’t the only big change in the litigation battle. Hotelier Steve Wynn, strategist Karl Rove, former Attorney General Bill Barr, and top Republican election lawyers launched an election litigation group, Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), in July 2022, and within three months chalked up several major victories.

For instance, RITE sued over controversial Wisconsin Elections Commission guidance that conflicted with state law, telling election clerks to accept ballots that had been spoiled, and won the case. It was also part of the group that successfully sued Pennsylvania over whether ballots that failed to be dated, as required by state law, could be counted. 

“It goes to show what responsible and tireless lawyering can do for election integrity,” said Derek Lyons, the president and CEO of RITE.

Groups with lengthier histories of battling for election integrity, such as the Public Interest Legal Foundation, also had successes. A Delaware court ruled that the state’s newly passed mail-in balloting scheme violated its constitution.

Monitoring Polls

U.S. elections used to occur on one day, requiring just one day of poll observations. Now that elections can spread out over days, weeks, or even months, many more workers are needed to monitor the casting of ballots.

The RNC hired 17 in-state election integrity directors and 37 state-based election integrity counsels in key states. They conducted more than 5,000 election integrity training sessions, recruited more than 70,000 poll watchers and workers, and worked with more than 110,000 unique volunteers nationwide. They set up an issue reporting system and distributed copies of Poll Watcher Principles for states. If voters encounter election issues, they can file a report, and attorneys will be dispatched to resolve the issues. Sites were set up in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Congressional Republicans also got in on the action. Rep. Rodney Davis, the top Republican on the House Administration Committee, notified all 50 states that he would be deploying dozens of specially trained election observers to protect the integrity of the ballot box.

The move occurred after Democrats nearly seized a seat won by Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa in 2020. She won her election by just six votes, leading Democrats to attempt to unseat her using parliamentary shenanigans. The Republicans of the House Administration Committee just released a mini-doc about Democrats’ attempt at literal election denialism.

With tens of millions of voters newly concerned about election integrity, other groups also took part in massive training operations. The Election Integrity Network, which started with a podcast on election integrity issues hosted by longtime election lawyer Cleta Mitchell, grew into state summits, which then built out into coalitions in states, attracting people to weekly meetings. The network has trained 76,000 poll workers.

The network’s North Carolina Election Integrity Team covers 95 percent of that state’s priority areas with poll observers. It has more than 30 local task forces, with representatives in 75 of 100 counties. More than 2,000 North Carolinians were individually trained. The group has established a strong working relationship with the state General Assembly to overhaul legislation and built relationships with local election officials. Similar groups are operating in Georgia, Virginia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and other states. 

The Vulnerable Voters Working Group meets to develop and implement ideas to protect nursing homes from left-wing ballot harvesting. The American Constitutional Rights Union is one coalition partner working to protect seniors from illicit activities.

Part of the benefit of an aggressive legal strategy is that it incentivizes election bureaucrats and officials to follow the law, which helps restore trust in elections, Election Integrity Network Director Marshall Yates says. “These people provide transparency and accountability to the system that was previously just run by unaccountable bureaucrats. They may or may not see something but just their presence is a check on making sure there is some accountability to the system, and it should restore confidence in seeing how elections were administered.”

What Remains

While reforms were passed in more than two dozen states, key lawsuits were filed and won, and poll workers are being deployed nationwide, many problems remain. Even with the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court victory, that state remains essentially lawless when it comes to election integrity. North Carolina, Nevada, Wisconsin, and other battleground states retain problematic election processes and guidance. And, inflated voter rolls, combined with unsolicited mail-in ballots, are a recipe for disaster.

The new election integrity groups have much work to do in the years ahead. But many Americans, from establishment Republicans to grassroots conservatives, have poured themselves into restoring integrity to elections nationwide. They have begun to achieve major successes in lobbying for election security, litigating against a well-funded activist opposition, and training poll watchers. And they did it all in the face of a hostile propaganda press that maliciously disparaged them as election deniers.

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

WHY IS ALMOST EVERYTHING OUT OF CONTROL?


Why Things Are “Out Of Control”
November 7, 2022

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on a new poll:

A new CBS poll shows that 8-in-10 (79%) of voters say things are “out of control.” This is alarming. It is wholly out of character for the American people to register such a high degree of consternation with the current state of affairs. Historically, it is in times of dire distress—a war or economic crisis—when sentiments are this extreme.

What’s going on? We get some idea of what’s driving this condition when we consider that the survey found that Republicans are winning over those who say things are “out of control” by more than 20 points. It suggests that Americans trace our situation to decisions reached by Democrats.

It’s not hard to rattle off some contributing factors:
high rates of inflation, dwindling retirement portfolios, the energy crisis, violent crime wave, surge in fentanyl deaths, problems with the supply chain, monster groups of illegal aliens crashing our borders, a spike in the homeless population, a record number of mentally ill people walking the streets, the near universal embrace of critical race theory, a woke military, left-wing indoctrination in the classroom, high rates of anxiety, depression and suicides among youth, near total distrust of the media, parental rights under fire, children encouraged to question their sex, an emboldened and aggressive China.

We’ve had many of these problems before, or problems similar to them, but what’s different this time is that many of these outcomes are a function of will: they have been intentionally generated. They are a matter of policy.

The pandemic proved to be costly, but few now think that shutting down businesses and schools, for as long as we did, was a smart move. When billions of dollars were suddenly added to the economy, high rates of inflation were unavoidable. The war on fossil fuels and the contrived demand for electric vehicles has also taken its toll.

Never before have we witnessed such a rash of pro-criminal legislation, the result being a predictable jump in violent crimes. Our southern border problem could be drastically relieved if some very commonsensical remedies were employed, but it is obvious that this problem—like so many others—is by design. This is what the present ruling class wants.

There is no legitimate reason why children should be told to question whether they are happy being a boy or a girl. A new poll reveals that 60% of Americans now say that encouraging children to “change their gender” is child abuse. Yet no one is held accountable for promoting it. The medical profession has disgracefully endorsed this sick agenda.
Accountability is lacking across the board.

The average American works hard and cannot understand why this is happening. It is happening because our elites in government, the corporations, education, activist organizations, the entertainment industry and the media have decided to launch the “Great Reset.” In other words, they have decided the country needs a radical overhaul. This explains why they are bent on shoving their radical agenda down our throats.
 
They are the ones responsible for creating this “out of control” environment. Not until the vast majority of Americans stand up to this madness will matters change. 

Phone: 212-371-3191E-mail: pr@catholicleague.org
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WHY IS ALMOST EVERYTHING OUT OF CONTROL?

HAS JORGE BERGOLIO NO SHAME???


Jorge Bergolio defends the indefensible, the appointment by him of a pro-abortion woman to the Pontifical Academy for Life!!! Has he no shame? 

 Simon Caldwell

November 7, 2022 at 2:22 pm

Pope Francis has defended the appointment of an atheist supporter of abortion to the Pontifical Academy for Life.

During an in-flight press conference on the return to Rome from Bahrain, the Holy Father said Prof Mariana Mazzucato would bring “a little more humanity” to the workings of an institution founded in 1994 to engage in the fields of biomedicine and law as they pertain to “the promotion and defence of life”.

The Pope said: “I have seen that in the Vatican, every time a woman comes in to do work in the Vatican things get better.”

He said: “And now, I put on the family council Mazzucato, who is a great economist from the United States, to give a little more humanity to this.”

Prof Mazzucato was among seven academics appointed by the Pope in mid-October to serve five-year terms with the Pontifical Academy for Life.

Her nomination was controversial because she is a public supporter of “reproductive rights”, who has tweeted and re-tweeted pro-abortion statements made after the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the 1973 Roe vs Wade judgment which made abortion up to birth in America a constitutional right, and returned abortion law to individual states.

Another recent appointee is Sheila Dinotshe Tlou, a former health minister in Botswana and a fervent advocate of contraception.

Last month another new member of the Academy, Robert Dell’Oro, a professor of moral theology at the Jesuit-run Loyola Marymount University in the United States, said that the overturning of Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court was a violation of “personal liberty” that verged on “totalitarian”.

The Pontifical Academy for Life has defended Prof Mazzucato’s appointment on the grounds that members are chosen to contribute to “fruitful interdisciplinary, intercultural, and interreligious dialogue”.

Francis set his public defence of her appointment in the context of wider support for the involvement of women in the Vatican and for the promotion of women’s rights in general, especially in parts of the world where women face discrimination.

He said: “The fight for women’s rights is an ongoing fight because in some places women have equality with men but in other places they do not.”

Francis singled out the practice of female genital mutilation as particularly “criminal”, asking journalists: “How come, in the world today, we cannot stop the tragedy of infibulation to young girls?”

“Equality between men and women is still not universally found and there are these incidents where women are second class or less,” he added. “We have to keep fighting for that, because women are a gift.”

The Pope continued: “A society that is unable to put women in her [rightful] place does not move forward.”

Pope Francis defends appointment of pro-abortion woman to Pontifical Academy for Life 

 Simon Caldwell

November 7, 2022 at 2:22 pm

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on HAS JORGE BERGOLIO NO SHAME???

A STATEMENT FROM PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP

Great news for our Country, Freedom, and Democracy in that businessman Tom Barrack, who should have never been charged or tried, was just acquitted of all charges. Likewise, his associate, Matthew Grimes, was also acquitted of all charges. My great respect goes out to the jurors for their courage and understanding in coming to an absolutely correct decision. This could be the beginning of our breakaway from Communism, and other very deep and dark places where the United States should never be. Cuba, Venezuela, and even the old Soviet Union were looking more and more like that could be us in the not too distant future. The upcoming Election is very big, but these acquittals of two innocent men greatly set the Radical Left back—but now they should immediately release Great Patriots, Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips, from prison in Houston where they are being held for, essentially, finding millions of illegal, Election-changing ballots. True the Vote should be praised for the incredible job they did, not ridiculed by the Radical Left, with their leaders thrown into jail. Also, start treating the January 6th Protestors fairly. Let them all go now! Whether it’s a Raid on Mar-a-Lago, with the violation of Constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment, based on a fake Document investigation where every other President had no liability, or the other phony Hoaxes and Scams that have been going on for years, Impeachment Hoax #1, Impeachment Hoax #2, Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, the Mueller Investigation where they found no Collusion, or more, we can’t let it happen. Congratulations on a Great Victory for our Nation!
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

HUNTER BIDEN’S CONNECTION TO RED CHINA IS A TREMENDOUS SOURCE OF LIABILITY FOR HIS FATHER, JOSEPH BIDEN AND FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Jack Maxey reveals Hunter Biden’s connection to Ukraine biolabs and Wuhan China


‘Look at your phones right now, and type in Metabiota and corona and bats. You will find numerous scientific papers signed by George Gao, the husband of Hunter Biden’s secretary in Beijing.’

Featured Image The Eric Metaxas Radio Show / Rumble


Maike
Hickso

Sat Nov 5, 2022 – 7:37 pm EDT

Listen to this article

0:00 / 15:261X

BeyondWords

(LifeSiteNews) — Jack Maxey, former co-host of Steve Bannon’s War Room and current member of LifeSite’s Faith & Reason, has revealed a connection between Hunter Biden, the research company Metabiota – which is involved with biolabs in Ukraine – as well as the Wuhan Chinese lab that is responsible for the coronavirus outbreak.

Maxey based his findings on some of the e-mails found in Hunter Biden’s laptop, as well as further research he personally conducted. While Maxey has been talking about these connections for some time, the story has been largely overlooked.

In a September 7 interview with the Sovereign Soul Show, Maxey explained this crucial and troubling connection between Hunter Biden and the Wuhan lab as follows:

Let’s go back to COVID. Literally, Hunter Biden and his partners raised millions of dollars from Metabiota. Metabiota was a privatized company that the U.S. intelligence used to run the biolabs in Ukraine which I have uncovered, [they are] also deeply involved inside the Wuhan lab. You can find papers written by Metabiota describing them as bat and corona experts. And Hunter had a secretary in Beijing, named Xiaoyang, her last name is Zeng, spelled Z E N G, and her husband is a guy named Fu Gao, or George Gao, senior, top guy in the Chinese CDC. And Hunter hooks this guy up with Metabiota, and they essentially run the gain of function experiments inside the Wuhan lab that gave us COVID! U.S. intel and disgusting characters like Tony Fauci et al are just as responsible for the COVID outbreak as the Chinese Communists, because we off-shored their Frankenstein experiments to China because they weren’t under law allowed to engage in these experiments inside the United States. And they went completely rogue, and now millions of people around the world lost their lives; the economy of the world lost trillions and trillions of lost opportunities, family businesses destroyed: these people need to be held to account.

A little research into the connection between Metabiota and the bat and corona research can confirm Maxey’s claims. See here for a 2017 study on bats and coronaviruses with Metabiota involvement; as well as another here.

By August of this year, Maxey had already developed and presented his thesis quite extensively.

At a political rally in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania on August 27, Maxey called Metabiota “the prime contractor inside all these Ukrainian labs.” He then also referred to a specific e-mail on the Hunter Biden laptop “between Eric Schwerin, Hunter’s broker-dealer manager and Hunter [Biden], which says: ‘Hunter, we gotta get a hold of Xiaoying’s husband, because I think he and the CDC could be really helpful for Metabiota.’”

On his Gettr account, Maxey has posted that 2014 e-mail from Schwerin to Hunter Biden.

Schwerin had also written on May 29 of that year: “Now that you got me thinking that way there are obviously some real potential synergies between Xiaoying’s husband’s work at CDC and what Metabiota does. Something else to think about.”

It is worth noting that in 2014, Xiaoying’s husband and his connection with the Chinese CDC are mentioned at least twice more in e-mail correspondence with Hunter Biden, each time mentioning possible ways of collaborating with him.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic

At the rally, Maxey continued: “Xiaoying, as it turns out this woman’s name: Xiaoying Zeng – or Zung, as they pronounce it, it is spelled Z E N G – she is a daughter inside the major Shanghai – CCP crime family, called the Zungs, who runs something called the ‘Shanghai clique’, and they have a lot of overlaps in Shanghai with another group called the – surprise – ‘oil clique’. And, guess what, her husband is a guy named Fu Gao or George Gao, trained either at Oxford or Cambridge, [who] spent a bunch of years in the United States, and he is a top guy at the Chinese CDC.”

Here, Maxey invited his audience to do some quick research of their own: “Look at your phones right now, and type in Metabiota and corona and bats. You will find numerous scientific papers signed by George Gao, the husband of Hunter Biden’s secretary in Beijing, and Metabiota on, guess what, coronaviruses – dozens of them.”

The Yale graduate and political analyst then also explained the history of Metabiota and how it “was created by U.S. intelligence”:

Essentially, in 2005, there was a presidential study done on weapons of mass destruction. It is unclassified, you can find it online. And in the WMD section of it, they have a section on biological and bio agents – be they lab-created, be they weapons of mass destruction, or naturally occurring. And after H1N1, we decided we needed an early warning system to be able to monitor these viruses and biological agents around the world. The recommendation in that document was that we create Special Forces fast teams, we train them up in biological weapons and then we attach to them scientists whom we support academically and whatever else, but it’s going to be an operation completely controlled under the umbrella of U.S. intelligence. Well, like everything else under President [George W.] Bush, they realized that by privatizing it, somebody could get rich. So they created Metabiota. It is sort of like Blackwater, right? And Metabiota is the prime contractor inside all those Ukrainian labs that they now admit that there are 20 some of them.

Maxey provided the link to this above-quoted official 2005 document on his Gettr account in March of this year. In the same month, he actually published some 250 e-mails from the Hunter Biden laptop dealing with Metabiota and the firm’s investment in that U.S. government-controlled company. (The links for these e-mail troves were taken down fairly quickly, but herehere, and here are samples. LifeSiteNews also reported on these e-mails at the time).

In one of the e-mails provided by Maxey, John DeLoche, Hunter Biden’s business partner, explained on March 5, 2014, the nature of Metabiota as follows: “what Palantir [an artificial intelligence company] is to the CIA Metabiota is [to] the USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture].”

Professor George Gao, the husband of Xiaoying Zeng, is a name not unknown to LifeSite readers either. He had participated at that very suspicious October 2019 event hosted by globalists preparing for a pandemic, just a few months before the coronavirus crisis started.

As reported by LifeSite’s Paul Smeaton in an article outlining this event: “Notable among them are the comments from Professor George F. Gao. He is the director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Gao said, in the context of the simulation, that ‘we have more cases in China, those are death cases reported, and also my staff told me that there is misinformation and there are some people who believe this is man-made, some pharmaceutical company made the virus, so there are some violations and even deaths because of this misinformation.’”

Gao also insisted in his intervention that health personnel need to be clearly instructed so they have the right answers, instead of having answers that would confuse the people.

The pandemic simulation event was organized by the World Economic Forum, together with John Hopkins University and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Xiaoying’s own close connection with Hunter Biden and his business partners is very evident when looking at the Hunter Biden laptop. In numerous occasions, her crucial role in setting up business relations with Chinese and other corporations is distinctly highlighted. Her name is shown on e-mails, as Maxey also stated, as Xiaoying Zeng. However, the name of her husband is not explicitly mentioned. Here, we need to trust Maxey’s own research.

Maxey also once posted a screenshot of his own web search of the connection between the Wuhan lab in China from whence the coronavirus obviously came – in recent weeks, more evidence has come out pointing to the fact that the coronavirus was man-made in a lab, with a recent Faith & Reason episode calling for a just punishment of those in responsible – and Metabiota.

This search was before September of 2019, and found clear results proving a connection. In fact, the connection goes back to 2014, the year Hunter Biden and his business partners originally thought of connecting Gao with Metabiota. Maxey commented on this obvious connection on April 7 of this year: “Connect the dots people – add bats and coronaviruses too. This is all there for those with eyes to see.”

When one searches the internet for the words Metabiota, bats, and coronavirus, one finds, for example, a 2017 study organized and funded by the group, entitled “Bats are the major reservoir of coronaviruses worldwide.”

Interestingly, Professor Gao was involved with Metabiota in an official capacity then too, and as a representative of the CDC in Wuhan no less!

In 2017, Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance (which also was involved in the October 2019 pandemic simulation event) published a study on the “The beginning of the end of the pandemic era,” and as contributors are mentioned both Metabiota and Professor Gao (CDC Wuhan).

Gao is also connected with Metabiota by way of a 2018 conference that took place in Thailand.

But there are even more troubling and suspicious events that have happened.

Around the same time the Wuhan lab gain-of-function research began in 2016 – the same very thing Dr. Anthony Fauci denied having been involved with – there took place a symposium discussing the dangers of this sort of research.

scientific report about that symposium described the discussion as follows: “A laboratory in Wuhan is on the cusp of being cleared to work with the world’s most dangerous pathogens. The move is part of a plan to build between five and seven biosafety level-4 (BSL-4) labs across the Chinese mainland by 2025, and has generated much excitement, as well as some concerns.”

Here, the report also mentioned the dangers of such a development: “Some scientists outside China worry about pathogens escaping, and the addition of a biological dimension to geopolitical tensions between China and other nations. But Chinese microbiologists are celebrating their entrance to the elite cadre empowered to wrestle with the world’s greatest biological threats.”

Professor Gao himself, however, did not see the dangers, but only the advantages of the Wuhan lab’s new work.

The report continued by quoting Gao: “’It will offer more opportunities for Chinese researchers, and our contribution on the BSL-4-level pathogens will benefit the world,’ says George Gao, director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology in Beijing. There are already two BSL-4 labs in Taiwan, but the National Bio-safety Laboratory, Wuhan, would be the first on the Chinese mainland.”

Gao is described in the report as being happy that he would be able to work with the Wuhan lab in studying certain viruses, such as the Ebola virus, and how to treat them.

Nota bene, the U.S. molecular biologist Professor Richard Ebright was referenced, as well, saying he was “not convinced of the need for more than one BSL-4 lab in mainland China. He suspects that the expansion there is a reaction to the networks in the United States and Europe, which he says are also unwarranted. He adds that governments will assume that such excess capacity is for the potential development of bioweapons.”

“These facilities are inherently dual use,” the professor stated, also saying he did not like the idea of injecting monkeys with pathogens because these animals “can run, they can scratch, they can bite.”

Interestingly, Ebright himself had also called out Fauci in 2021 on his claims that he was not involved with that particular gain-of-function research.

Here we deal again with the above-mentioned EcoHealth Alliance and its director Dr. Peter Daszak, who conducted such research with regard to coronaviruses and bats.

LifeSite’s Michael Haynes wrote at the time that new documents have been released “detailing United States funding provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) into coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).”

The document reveals “a grant from the NIH to Peter Daszak’s now-controversial EcoHealth Alliance, which has long partnered with the WIV in conducting gain-of-function research, particularly in coronaviruses,” Haynes added. This NIH funding of the gain-of-function research was taking place from 2014 to 2019.

When further looking into this field of research into coronaviruses, it becomes clear that Professor Gao himself is an expert in this field as well.

In his official curriculum vitae, his work on coronaviruses goes back to 2004, and in 2015, he is shown to have published a paper on bats and coronaviruses: “Lu*, G., Wang, Q. and Gao*, G. F., 2015, Bat-to-human: spike features determining “host jump” of coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and beyond. Trends in Microbiology, 23 (8): 468-478.”

Another paper is listed as “Wang, Q., Qi, J., Yuan, Y., Xuan, Y., Han, P., Wan, Y., Ji, W., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, J., Iwamoto, A., Woo, P. C. Y., Yuen, K.-Y., Yan, J., Lu, G. and Gao*, G. F., 2014, Bat origins of MERS-CoV supported by bat coronavirus HKU4 usage of human receptor CD26, Cell Host and Microbe, 16 (3): 328-337.”

So what we have here, based on Maxey’s irreplaceable and courageous work, is a close connection between Hunter Biden, the wife of the (until recently) head of the Chinese CDC, Professor Gao, Ukraine-linked Metabiota, and the Wuhan lab in China.

The facts put together here could certainly be regarded as the “smoking gun.”

We trust that people with more expertise in these fields touched upon will do further research, and this report should be regarded as an invitation to do so.

Featured Image

Dr. Maike Hickson was born and raised in Germany. She holds a PhD from the University of Hannover, Germany, after having written in Switzerland her doctoral dissertation on the history of Swiss intellectuals before and during World War II. She now lives in the U.S. and is married to Dr. Robert Hickson, and they have been blessed with two beautiful children. She is a happy housewife who likes to write articles when time permits.

Dr. Hickson published in 2014 a Festschrift, a collection of some thirty essays written by thoughtful authors in honor of her husband upon his 70th birthday, which is entitled A Catholic Witness in Our Time.

Hickson has closely followed the papacy of Pope Francis and the developments in the Catholic Church in Germany, and she has been writing articles on religion and politics for U.S. and European publications and websites such as LifeSiteNews, OnePeterFive, The Wanderer, Rorate Caeli, Catholicism.org, Catholic Family News, Christian Order, Notizie Pro-Vita, Corrispondenza Romana, Katholisches.info, Der Dreizehnte,  Zeit-Fragen, and Westfalen-Blatt.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on HUNTER BIDEN’S CONNECTION TO RED CHINA IS A TREMENDOUS SOURCE OF LIABILITY FOR HIS FATHER, JOSEPH BIDEN AND FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OF COURSE, WE WOULD NEVER EXPECT JORGE BERGOLIO TO COME TO THE DEFENSE OF CARDINAL ZEN!!!

022

COUNTERREVOLUTION: Pope Francis, Joe Biden Losing Control

Written by  Michael J. Matt | Editor

COUNTERREVOLUTION: Pope Francis, Joe Biden Losing Control

New from Remnant TV… (YouTube Premiere with Michael Matt Sunday night at 7CST)

QUESTION: With 90-year-old Joseph Cardinal Zen on trial this week for defying the Chinese Communist Government, where’s the Vatican? Why is pope Francis not speaking out in Zen’s defense?

In this episode of The Remnant Underground, Michael takes a look at this question, as well as the ramifications of two recent developments:

1) Elon Musk takes control of Twitter and the revival of free speech is underway

2) New York Supreme Court rules that the jab does not stop the spread of Covid

Both of these developments come as a threat to the globalists, including Team Francis inside the Vatican, especially where Number 2 is concerned.  If Tony Fauci needs to be help responsible for crimes against humanity, certainly so too should Pope Francis. 

And now the woke pope’s alliance with Globalism and the radical Left is throwing the Catholic Church into civil war. In his bid to become chaplain of the New World Order, Francis has alienated powerful members of the hierarchy, including the former head of the Holy Office.

Let’s review: Archbishop Charles Chaput blasted any priest who would dare give communion to Joe Biden – a “Catholic” who, according to Chaput, is not in communion with the Catholic Church.

Cardinal Zen, who  is now in prison, for standing up to Communist China — a government with which Francis has signed a secret deal — called the Vatican Secretary of State a “betrayer”. 

Bishop Schneider didn’t pull any punches where the Vatican is concerned when he appeared in person on Steve Bannon’s War Room.

Cardinal Muller on EWTN accused Team Francis of engaging in a “hostile takeover of the Catholic Church.”

Archbishop Vigano, in a recent interview, levelled the Vatican’s sellout to Davos.

And there’re much more. Whether you’re Catholic or not, this is big!  Pope Francis — who provided the moral authority for the global lockdown and climate change revolution — is facing massive pushback from within his own Church, which is why the Vatican Secretary of State said THIS to the top brass at EWTN in Rome last week. 

Finally, the civil war is on. Which side are you on?

Plus! Introducing Flores Cardinal Crayola, Prefect of the Congregation for Whole Body Listening…

https://remnant-tv.com/videoEmbed/728/counterrevolution-pope-francis-joe-biden-losing-control?channelName=RemnantTV

Bishop Schneider Interview: https://remnant-tv.com/video/717/loyal-opposition-michael-matt-interviews-bishop-schneider?channelName=RemnantTV

Archbishop Viganò Interview: https://remnant-tv.com/video/726/michael-matt-interviews-archbishop-vigano-at-cic

Please support RTV: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/donate-today

Listen to Michael Matt’s podcasts:

SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/1AdkCDFfR736CqcGw2Uvd0

APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-michael-j-matt-show/id1563298989

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OF COURSE, WE WOULD NEVER EXPECT JORGE BERGOLIO TO COME TO THE DEFENSE OF CARDINAL ZEN!!!